![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
like the answer :) what i've wrote is write on the APA's page too! how can i directly attribute it? thanks Psico pp ( talk) 01:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Dr.K., Regarding your deletion of the edit, if you say so then fine. I do feel the way they identified themselves is major fundamental point to make, additional to what the kingdom's name was (some readers like it spelled out), but I take your point. In light of our lengthy discussions to arrive at a conclusion and the subsequent conduct of that editor, I was just about finished pinning something on the Administrator Noticeboards. Subsequent to your edit, I will pause. I am aware that editor is an administrator, but between accusing someone of being a sock, the manner in which they delete, and the wholesale references that are taken out in the process, I feel their conduct is inappropriate. Sincerely and best regards, Romaioi ( talk) 02:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi again, Dr.K., Thanks for not deleting the references in your last edit, but they pertain to all that was stated not just the portions that remain. It isn't obvious that Roman state traditions were followed based on the remaining text. Sure it can be inferred but the modern nomenclature can confuse the issue. Regarding the oriental influence, I thought we discussed this - it is mentioned in the cited materials. Sincerely, Romaioi ( talk) 02:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
(I'm not sure if this is correct place to post this) Dr.K I would appreciate you taking another look at the links that I added. These reviews complimented the pages I added. I understand there the links here are "no follow", I have writers who write articles relating to photography equipment and educational in value. If I placed in wrong spot... it wasn't intentional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Schult ( talk • contribs) 08:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
If my knowledge is based off articles from Photographytalk... and I'm adding content to an article on wikipedia... if I'm not mistaken it clearly says I'm suppose to reference the work. So how is this considered spam? I'm adding value to your board, and I'm following your instructions posted indicating to give reference to work?
Am I missing something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Schult ( talk • contribs) 04:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
What for was the revert when in fact the edit is more detailed than the previous one? ГоранМирчевски ( talk) 05:13, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Discussion has apparently opened up again from ground zero, if you'd like to return to it. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 17:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
That was nice of you. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey Dr.K,
Noticed you reverted my edit in the ]]Competition between Airbus and Boeing]] section. I Added Airbus as "See also" read material. And deleted the Airbus Executive and Private Aviation section. Isnt it so that the main Airbus article is better fitted in this article? Is it maby an idea to put both the articles in the "See also" chapter? Njirk ( talk) 12:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
...but since your and AndyTheGrump's names have come up in the latest posts at Talk:Demi Moore#A specific proposal, I thought you might want to be alerted in case you wanted to comment. I truly apologize for any inconvenience, and wish you a Happy New Year, with all the promise that holds.
Also, what a beautiful, exotic locale on your user page.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 17:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
You are aware that all mention of the fact that Jesssica Amanda Salmonson is a transsexual has been edited out of the article, right? The link I gave was to a site that mentioned this fact, which was never particularly a secret in the science fiction community (well, not a secret until recently, I guess.)
I would have thought a reference to this would have some importance. Of course, anybody who was serious in researching JAS would refer to reference materials available in print, but it did seem that at least a link to this information would be useful if anybody wants an understanding of the author. 108.81.78.48 ( talk) 15:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
|
I've seen an editing war between us and, i would like not to war but to reach an understanding, if u would like to talk, message me. :) Ric5575 ( talk) 21:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
so thirsty XD, i understand and appreciate your kindness, i really do, so hope your not mad. i hope not to sound ridiculous by saying, how about if put he was a french born Corsican and you put that he was born in France, to make it more accurate, message me if u have any more ideas. Ps... if i were u, i also would have reported me : ) Ric5575 ( talk) 22:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
and thanx Ric5575 ( talk) 00:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC) |
The information I added from his website I wrote from an interview with him and research. Can you explain how I can add these changes and not have them reverted?
Ok. I conversed with moonriddengirl and she said the easiest thing to do is for Dominic to put "The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)". He has now done this.
She also wrote "Either way, we'd need to provide proper attribution to his site, which we do with a "template" at the bottom of the page: Template:Dual, for instance. If he decides to go this route, Dr. K or I should be able to help you".
Please instruct.
Great thanks. How do I help get rid of the "This article has multiple issues"?
these guys copy contents from wiki and paste it on their website and claim that it belongs to them... they have no sense and shame... how to keep them away from here, thats the reason I made such harsh statements. If that has hurt you by some means, I regret for the same BrownyCat ( talk) 16:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey there stranger. Didn't realize this was one of yours until after I AfDed. Sorry You know I love museums, but I'm not even sure this one exists. QUick question on
this comment. Is that actually the name of the the museum? If so, it should be in the article so those of us who don't know Georgian can try to find results. Although, now I see you've removed your comment so maybe I'm confused ETA: whoops you weren't creator. Sorry for confusion. Misread AfD
StarM 22:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello DrK, in response to your note on my talk page I've posted my response and explanation at the talk of the page in question. As I've indicated there, I'm not going to involved further with editing this entry until some additional discussion of the points I've raised. Thanks. Malljaja ( talk) 21:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Dr.K., I've just peer reviewed the Cracker Barrel article and we'd like to get some more input from interested editors. If you're interested, please weigh in. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 22:09, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Someone we know is at it again at Jessica Lange, which is rapidly becoming just a list of awards and nominations. Any ideas on how to proceed, other than just a rollback (which, I'm sure will not be well received...) Blake Burba ( talk) 04:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
![]()
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For kind assistance and lending a hand. -- Djathink imacowboy 03:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
As directed, please see.... [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mt6617 ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Im new here and im just editing, what do you mean by this message, who is ric5575 and other accusitions??? Headshot789 —Preceding undated comment added 23:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC).
Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero ( talk) 16:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to bug you about this--our pal MarkAlexisGabriel is at it again. He seems rather fired up, and I'm not exactly sure how, policy-wise, to dissuade him from continuing to pick away at this article. Your guidance would be welcome. Blake Burba ( talk) 19:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
If you could keep an additional eye on this dude, he's been pulling these stunts for some time now. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
in 7aum arivu article if u think that cnn ibn is copyright violations then remove only that reference and keep times of india reference . there is no need to remove the whole paragraph its important. we guyz find an authenticated site for boxoffice and u have removed the paragraph easily its not fair .pls dont do it again if u think cnn ibn is copyright violations atleast keep that times of india reference dont remove the boxoffice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bothiman ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
My edits here are confirmed by tornado expert Tom Grazulis and his book Significant Tornadoes. Please do not delete them again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.26.140 ( talk) 05:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
90% of the old tornado articles with listings are unsourced anyway, just leave it alone. The information IS credible. Sharkguy05 ( talk) 05:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Sharkguy05
why did YOU support the notion of the germans being Germanic , how are the germans any diffrent from any other germanic speaking peoples , for example the swedes , norweigians and dutch austrians , those articles does not mention "Germanic ethnic group" in the lead so goes the same for germans so am asking you as a request to removing "Germanic ethnic group" from the germans , i mean wikipedia should not contradict itself , as said why arent the people above count as germanic if the germans do 95.199.28.127 ( talk) 18:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Campbell Hausfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Generator ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated Byzantine Empire for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
--DGaw ( talk) 22:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
With regards to the Armenian Genocide denial and ( recent reverts). Please see User talk:Realityvstruth. Realityvstruth has now been warned about 3RR. However it is time to take the dispute to the talk article talk page. -- PBS ( talk) 23:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
For being willing to mentor people. BTW: the title was not bad, but the link was a bit of a shock! Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 07:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
So why treat a Ukrainian President different? — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 23:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Above reply struck as message by Yulia was supposed to be in jest. :) Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 00:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Dear Dr.K.,
I've seen you have been interested in Ukrainian public persons. You are welcome to have a look at the article about Rinat Akhmetov and your comments will be highly appreciated, as though I'm relatively young Wiki user, to my mind Львівське has been pushing the coverage of Rinat Akhmetov bio as a criminal, breaking relevant Wiki rules. Thank you, -- Orekhova ( talk) 11:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
hello he is vandalising, edit warring, violating 3rr and generally being a nuisence on the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Mark_Duggan
I noticed that you have an interest in HAL 9000, when I was working on a userpage for PALZ 9000, a wiki bot, I noticed that the article says HAL got his orders from the National Council on Astronautics, but in the movie, it's from the National Security Council. Is the book different to the movie do you think ? I don't have the book, all I have is the movie, and I took time to be precise with the " NSC directive 342/23 top secret January 30, 2001 " which I wrote down while running a loop over that part of the movie. The article is like this :
Dr. Chandra discovers that HAL's crisis was caused by a programming contradiction: he was constructed for "the accurate processing of information without distortion or concealment", yet his orders, directly from Dr. Heywood Floyd at the National Council on Astronautics, required him to keep the discovery of the Monolith TMA-1 a secret for reasons of national security.
By the way, what do you think of my very crude homage to HAL on the bot page ? Penyulap talk 07:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm afraid I've just thrown a rotten egg in Enosis_is... meaning or political movement, or disrespect?. It was reading the article Corfu that got me to look at Enosis, which then got me rather upset. That you edited the Corfu article and inserting those usages of 'Enosis' leads me to risk leaving this note. I won't risk asking a couple Greek friends how they would feel about this, as it would hurt their feelings to know their history has been forgotten. Can you think of some editors who could comment usefully on the talk page? I'm afraid I could only contribute being upset. 24.28.17.231 ( talk) 21:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I will not. Lol. 2.120.88.30 ( talk) 16:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/cartoon/1722311-sad-figures
http://www.presseurop.eu/files/burki-merkel.jpg
~
Iloveandrea (
talk) 13:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
'When Horst Reichenbach arrived in Athens towards the end of 2011 to head a new European Union task force, the Greek media instantly dubbed him "Third Reichenbach".' Ha ha ha! =D ~ Iloveandrea ( talk) 21:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
It's Good Friday. I ate
hot crosses today. This evening, I'm drinking beer. Solidarity beer. If I drink enough, your economy will recover nicely.
~
Iloveandrea (
talk) 19:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
User:Dr.K., a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dr.K. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dr.K. during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Calabe 1992 04:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help in preserving the article General Joseph Colton from vandalism by several sockpuppets of JHerbertMunster. Unfortunately, I don't think that he has given up yet, because now that the article is semi-protected, BanaBong has taken to the talk page of that article to have some of that content re-added. BanaBong's edit history shows that he is probably another sockpuppet, but the SPI has already been archived, so I just though that I'd give you a heads up, in case you wanted to reopen the investigation. Fortdj33 ( talk) 18:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Made this revert [2] and then noticed the recent history. Gzoghaib has receieved a final warning but when I checked Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring it wants 4 revert diffs made by the offender. Gzoghaib has, at the moment, made 4 additions of unsourced OR. I don't know enough about all this to really pursue it properly and its late here Im getting tired and I have a busy day tomorrow, so just letting you know and you can take it from here if you want. Thanks. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 07:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Dr.K.. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 12:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | On 10 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marie Aspioti, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1955 Marie Aspioti returned her MBE to Queen Elizabeth II in protest against the British policies on Cyprus regarding enosis with Greece? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marie Aspioti.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Help. I don't know what to do with IP editor. He called my questions "stupid", insists that I or another editor was wrong and one definition of supercouple was right, and I don't know whose side you are on. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Why are you removing properly referenced inclusion on the list? The Repubblica article says: ...al suo fianco, Fiori ha voluto anche Gioacchino Albanese, già suo "confratello" nella loggia P2 di Licio Gelli... which translates as ...at his side, Fiori also wanted Gioacchino Albanese, who had been his "brother" in the P2 lodge of Licio Gelli ... And why are you removing a link to the Anselmi report which I restored because it was dead? - DonCalo ( talk) 20:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Aspioti-ELKA at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
LauraHale (
talk) 02:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry - yes. That revert was a mistake - "you are fast" is so often a vandal's comment. Philip Trueman ( talk) 02:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia is Roman Catholic fundamentalist propaganda - its editors are Roman Catholic believers in nonsense - the articles about Christianity are all biased and tendencious in nature. Propaganda bullshit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnygothere ( talk • contribs) 16:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
like the answer :) what i've wrote is write on the APA's page too! how can i directly attribute it? thanks Psico pp ( talk) 01:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Dr.K., Regarding your deletion of the edit, if you say so then fine. I do feel the way they identified themselves is major fundamental point to make, additional to what the kingdom's name was (some readers like it spelled out), but I take your point. In light of our lengthy discussions to arrive at a conclusion and the subsequent conduct of that editor, I was just about finished pinning something on the Administrator Noticeboards. Subsequent to your edit, I will pause. I am aware that editor is an administrator, but between accusing someone of being a sock, the manner in which they delete, and the wholesale references that are taken out in the process, I feel their conduct is inappropriate. Sincerely and best regards, Romaioi ( talk) 02:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi again, Dr.K., Thanks for not deleting the references in your last edit, but they pertain to all that was stated not just the portions that remain. It isn't obvious that Roman state traditions were followed based on the remaining text. Sure it can be inferred but the modern nomenclature can confuse the issue. Regarding the oriental influence, I thought we discussed this - it is mentioned in the cited materials. Sincerely, Romaioi ( talk) 02:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
(I'm not sure if this is correct place to post this) Dr.K I would appreciate you taking another look at the links that I added. These reviews complimented the pages I added. I understand there the links here are "no follow", I have writers who write articles relating to photography equipment and educational in value. If I placed in wrong spot... it wasn't intentional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Schult ( talk • contribs) 08:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
If my knowledge is based off articles from Photographytalk... and I'm adding content to an article on wikipedia... if I'm not mistaken it clearly says I'm suppose to reference the work. So how is this considered spam? I'm adding value to your board, and I'm following your instructions posted indicating to give reference to work?
Am I missing something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Schult ( talk • contribs) 04:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
What for was the revert when in fact the edit is more detailed than the previous one? ГоранМирчевски ( talk) 05:13, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Discussion has apparently opened up again from ground zero, if you'd like to return to it. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 17:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
That was nice of you. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey Dr.K,
Noticed you reverted my edit in the ]]Competition between Airbus and Boeing]] section. I Added Airbus as "See also" read material. And deleted the Airbus Executive and Private Aviation section. Isnt it so that the main Airbus article is better fitted in this article? Is it maby an idea to put both the articles in the "See also" chapter? Njirk ( talk) 12:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
...but since your and AndyTheGrump's names have come up in the latest posts at Talk:Demi Moore#A specific proposal, I thought you might want to be alerted in case you wanted to comment. I truly apologize for any inconvenience, and wish you a Happy New Year, with all the promise that holds.
Also, what a beautiful, exotic locale on your user page.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 17:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
You are aware that all mention of the fact that Jesssica Amanda Salmonson is a transsexual has been edited out of the article, right? The link I gave was to a site that mentioned this fact, which was never particularly a secret in the science fiction community (well, not a secret until recently, I guess.)
I would have thought a reference to this would have some importance. Of course, anybody who was serious in researching JAS would refer to reference materials available in print, but it did seem that at least a link to this information would be useful if anybody wants an understanding of the author. 108.81.78.48 ( talk) 15:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
|
I've seen an editing war between us and, i would like not to war but to reach an understanding, if u would like to talk, message me. :) Ric5575 ( talk) 21:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
so thirsty XD, i understand and appreciate your kindness, i really do, so hope your not mad. i hope not to sound ridiculous by saying, how about if put he was a french born Corsican and you put that he was born in France, to make it more accurate, message me if u have any more ideas. Ps... if i were u, i also would have reported me : ) Ric5575 ( talk) 22:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
and thanx Ric5575 ( talk) 00:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC) |
The information I added from his website I wrote from an interview with him and research. Can you explain how I can add these changes and not have them reverted?
Ok. I conversed with moonriddengirl and she said the easiest thing to do is for Dominic to put "The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)". He has now done this.
She also wrote "Either way, we'd need to provide proper attribution to his site, which we do with a "template" at the bottom of the page: Template:Dual, for instance. If he decides to go this route, Dr. K or I should be able to help you".
Please instruct.
Great thanks. How do I help get rid of the "This article has multiple issues"?
these guys copy contents from wiki and paste it on their website and claim that it belongs to them... they have no sense and shame... how to keep them away from here, thats the reason I made such harsh statements. If that has hurt you by some means, I regret for the same BrownyCat ( talk) 16:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey there stranger. Didn't realize this was one of yours until after I AfDed. Sorry You know I love museums, but I'm not even sure this one exists. QUick question on
this comment. Is that actually the name of the the museum? If so, it should be in the article so those of us who don't know Georgian can try to find results. Although, now I see you've removed your comment so maybe I'm confused ETA: whoops you weren't creator. Sorry for confusion. Misread AfD
StarM 22:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello DrK, in response to your note on my talk page I've posted my response and explanation at the talk of the page in question. As I've indicated there, I'm not going to involved further with editing this entry until some additional discussion of the points I've raised. Thanks. Malljaja ( talk) 21:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Dr.K., I've just peer reviewed the Cracker Barrel article and we'd like to get some more input from interested editors. If you're interested, please weigh in. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 22:09, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Someone we know is at it again at Jessica Lange, which is rapidly becoming just a list of awards and nominations. Any ideas on how to proceed, other than just a rollback (which, I'm sure will not be well received...) Blake Burba ( talk) 04:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
![]()
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For kind assistance and lending a hand. -- Djathink imacowboy 03:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
As directed, please see.... [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mt6617 ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Im new here and im just editing, what do you mean by this message, who is ric5575 and other accusitions??? Headshot789 —Preceding undated comment added 23:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC).
Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero ( talk) 16:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to bug you about this--our pal MarkAlexisGabriel is at it again. He seems rather fired up, and I'm not exactly sure how, policy-wise, to dissuade him from continuing to pick away at this article. Your guidance would be welcome. Blake Burba ( talk) 19:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
If you could keep an additional eye on this dude, he's been pulling these stunts for some time now. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
in 7aum arivu article if u think that cnn ibn is copyright violations then remove only that reference and keep times of india reference . there is no need to remove the whole paragraph its important. we guyz find an authenticated site for boxoffice and u have removed the paragraph easily its not fair .pls dont do it again if u think cnn ibn is copyright violations atleast keep that times of india reference dont remove the boxoffice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bothiman ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
My edits here are confirmed by tornado expert Tom Grazulis and his book Significant Tornadoes. Please do not delete them again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.26.140 ( talk) 05:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
90% of the old tornado articles with listings are unsourced anyway, just leave it alone. The information IS credible. Sharkguy05 ( talk) 05:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Sharkguy05
why did YOU support the notion of the germans being Germanic , how are the germans any diffrent from any other germanic speaking peoples , for example the swedes , norweigians and dutch austrians , those articles does not mention "Germanic ethnic group" in the lead so goes the same for germans so am asking you as a request to removing "Germanic ethnic group" from the germans , i mean wikipedia should not contradict itself , as said why arent the people above count as germanic if the germans do 95.199.28.127 ( talk) 18:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Campbell Hausfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Generator ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated Byzantine Empire for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
--DGaw ( talk) 22:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
With regards to the Armenian Genocide denial and ( recent reverts). Please see User talk:Realityvstruth. Realityvstruth has now been warned about 3RR. However it is time to take the dispute to the talk article talk page. -- PBS ( talk) 23:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
For being willing to mentor people. BTW: the title was not bad, but the link was a bit of a shock! Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 07:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
So why treat a Ukrainian President different? — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 23:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Above reply struck as message by Yulia was supposed to be in jest. :) Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 00:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Dear Dr.K.,
I've seen you have been interested in Ukrainian public persons. You are welcome to have a look at the article about Rinat Akhmetov and your comments will be highly appreciated, as though I'm relatively young Wiki user, to my mind Львівське has been pushing the coverage of Rinat Akhmetov bio as a criminal, breaking relevant Wiki rules. Thank you, -- Orekhova ( talk) 11:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
hello he is vandalising, edit warring, violating 3rr and generally being a nuisence on the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Mark_Duggan
I noticed that you have an interest in HAL 9000, when I was working on a userpage for PALZ 9000, a wiki bot, I noticed that the article says HAL got his orders from the National Council on Astronautics, but in the movie, it's from the National Security Council. Is the book different to the movie do you think ? I don't have the book, all I have is the movie, and I took time to be precise with the " NSC directive 342/23 top secret January 30, 2001 " which I wrote down while running a loop over that part of the movie. The article is like this :
Dr. Chandra discovers that HAL's crisis was caused by a programming contradiction: he was constructed for "the accurate processing of information without distortion or concealment", yet his orders, directly from Dr. Heywood Floyd at the National Council on Astronautics, required him to keep the discovery of the Monolith TMA-1 a secret for reasons of national security.
By the way, what do you think of my very crude homage to HAL on the bot page ? Penyulap talk 07:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm afraid I've just thrown a rotten egg in Enosis_is... meaning or political movement, or disrespect?. It was reading the article Corfu that got me to look at Enosis, which then got me rather upset. That you edited the Corfu article and inserting those usages of 'Enosis' leads me to risk leaving this note. I won't risk asking a couple Greek friends how they would feel about this, as it would hurt their feelings to know their history has been forgotten. Can you think of some editors who could comment usefully on the talk page? I'm afraid I could only contribute being upset. 24.28.17.231 ( talk) 21:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I will not. Lol. 2.120.88.30 ( talk) 16:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/cartoon/1722311-sad-figures
http://www.presseurop.eu/files/burki-merkel.jpg
~
Iloveandrea (
talk) 13:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
'When Horst Reichenbach arrived in Athens towards the end of 2011 to head a new European Union task force, the Greek media instantly dubbed him "Third Reichenbach".' Ha ha ha! =D ~ Iloveandrea ( talk) 21:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
It's Good Friday. I ate
hot crosses today. This evening, I'm drinking beer. Solidarity beer. If I drink enough, your economy will recover nicely.
~
Iloveandrea (
talk) 19:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
User:Dr.K., a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dr.K. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dr.K. during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Calabe 1992 04:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help in preserving the article General Joseph Colton from vandalism by several sockpuppets of JHerbertMunster. Unfortunately, I don't think that he has given up yet, because now that the article is semi-protected, BanaBong has taken to the talk page of that article to have some of that content re-added. BanaBong's edit history shows that he is probably another sockpuppet, but the SPI has already been archived, so I just though that I'd give you a heads up, in case you wanted to reopen the investigation. Fortdj33 ( talk) 18:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Made this revert [2] and then noticed the recent history. Gzoghaib has receieved a final warning but when I checked Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring it wants 4 revert diffs made by the offender. Gzoghaib has, at the moment, made 4 additions of unsourced OR. I don't know enough about all this to really pursue it properly and its late here Im getting tired and I have a busy day tomorrow, so just letting you know and you can take it from here if you want. Thanks. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 07:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Dr.K.. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 12:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | On 10 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marie Aspioti, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1955 Marie Aspioti returned her MBE to Queen Elizabeth II in protest against the British policies on Cyprus regarding enosis with Greece? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marie Aspioti.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Help. I don't know what to do with IP editor. He called my questions "stupid", insists that I or another editor was wrong and one definition of supercouple was right, and I don't know whose side you are on. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Why are you removing properly referenced inclusion on the list? The Repubblica article says: ...al suo fianco, Fiori ha voluto anche Gioacchino Albanese, già suo "confratello" nella loggia P2 di Licio Gelli... which translates as ...at his side, Fiori also wanted Gioacchino Albanese, who had been his "brother" in the P2 lodge of Licio Gelli ... And why are you removing a link to the Anselmi report which I restored because it was dead? - DonCalo ( talk) 20:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Aspioti-ELKA at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
LauraHale (
talk) 02:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry - yes. That revert was a mistake - "you are fast" is so often a vandal's comment. Philip Trueman ( talk) 02:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia is Roman Catholic fundamentalist propaganda - its editors are Roman Catholic believers in nonsense - the articles about Christianity are all biased and tendencious in nature. Propaganda bullshit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnygothere ( talk • contribs) 16:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)