|
A tag has been placed on Category:2021 US Open Series indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Murray. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (2004–2021) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Firestar464 (
talk)
03:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:October 2021 events in Thailand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
-- 17:21, Sunday, August 29, 2021 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paraconsistent logic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page If.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
1.) In case you haven't seen it, I only mentioned northern cyprus twice in the section in the article Muslim romani people, so I deleted one mention.
2.) Rom is not called man in romanes language, it means Husband. Man means Djeno. Roma in Coptic means human, you can read about it, on wikipedia coptic language and everywhere.
3.) Ottoman or Turkish culture is the same for the Muslim roma at the Balkans.
4.) That there was once a separate sandjak for muslim roma at the Ottoman empire, is actually a general knowledge, why do you need to source? ???
5.) The Romanlar in Turkey are Sunni Muslims of Hanafi Madhab, there are no christian roma group in Turkey. So why you always wrote today and mostly in the Article ??? today and mostly in which case? What you want to say with this phrases ? It is also known that the majority of Turkish-speaking roma, especially in bulgaria, describe themselves as turks and deny their roma origins. Please read the article of the roma in bulgaria on wikipedia.
Your non-roma makes no distinction between the various roma groups. You throw them all in one pot, the only example you non roma people use are the vlax roma from romania. However, the majority of the roma are not vlax roma from romania. There is no single origin theory that all diverse roma groups accept, almost every group has its own myth of origin. Especially based on the country where the roma live in since centurys and which religion they belong to.
I hope you are satisfied when I get banned. Anyway, it's no longer fun on wikipedia, there are so many self-proclaimed historians who just refuse to allow other opinions. As for sources, if self-proclaimed non-Roma historians are used as a source because they publish books, articles, etc., should that be considered the truth? Also the fabricated word romani in english, what is that supposed to be? The word Romani or Romanes, actually refers to the language, not the people. However, many Roma groups do not refer to themselves as Roma, but by other names.
-- Nalanidil ( talk) 13:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
As I already mentioned, the knowledge of these sources is based on only one group, namely the Vlax Roma from Romania, their culture, religion, way of life, myths etc., are unfortunately transferred to all other non-Vlax Roma by self-appointed non-Roma historians. And that makes me angry.
Nalanidil (
talk)
19:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
There are 18 reliable sources for the subject of Bahara alavi which are independent and have significant coverage for that. why are not Wikipedia's users able to see those sources? it is so confusing. Khabat4545 ( talk) 13:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
You reviewed and rejected my submitted article. One thing you asked was to prove the name "Airport Road" was named due to the presence of an airport. Will this do (2nd link at end)?
"Airport Road is designated as Peel Road 7 and named for Toronto Pearson International Airport in Mississauga, near where it begins."
I have more to ask, but this for now. Transportfan70 ( talk) 19:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia has a policy regarding the obvious: Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue. Transportfan70 ( talk) 03:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Me again. I corrected two of the issues. But what do you mean that Google Maps is not reliable and uses copyright traps? Transportfan70 ( talk) 04:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
But these link to satellite photos of major cities. How can they be fake? For one thing, they can't be fake "ghost areas" as I wouldn't even have a basis to write an article if they were, as I wouldn't even think of looking for them.
That's some tough review criteria! Transportfan70 ( talk) 18:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't really think there is anything else, as municipalities don't tend to put detailed maps online, and if they do you can't link to the zoomed-in area specifically. Transportfan70 ( talk) 01:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Have you made a decision yet? Transportfan70 ( talk)
Is the article good to go? If so, when will you move it to the article space? Transportfan70 ( talk) 03:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
I took care of those. Transportfan70 ( talk) 01:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Transportfan70 ( talk) 02:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
North Kosovo crisis (2021) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Eviolite --
Eviolite (
talk)
03:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
North Kosovo crisis (2021) you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:North Kosovo crisis (2021) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Eviolite --
Eviolite (
talk)
08:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
2021 North Kosovo crisis you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:2021 North Kosovo crisis for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Eviolite --
Eviolite (
talk)
21:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
2021 North Kosovo crisis you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:2021 North Kosovo crisis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.
eviolite
(talk)
06:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)On 14 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 North Kosovo crisis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the series of protests that led to the 2021 North Kosovo crisis was caused by a ban on Serbian license plates from the Kosovan Government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 North Kosovo crisis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, 2021 North Kosovo crisis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Influenza A virus subtype H5N6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDC.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in the Take the Lead contest. You are one of the winners and to sort out the prize could you email me at karla.marte@wikimedia.org.uk to coordinate. Karla Marte(WMUK) ( talk) 11:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I hope I'm not bothering you, I saw that you approved my AfC submission for Favorite (Vampire but the title of the page in the mainspace doesn't have the final bracket and I can't move it to its actual name. I'm new to Wikipedia, so I wanted to ask if there was a reason for it or if it's just an error. Thank you! Poirot09 ( talk) 17:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ Dege31:. I don't get why you onesidedly accepted the draft for Tajine Zitoun as it is, when several comments highlighted the flaws with the article, namely the improper use of sources. I also think you didn't properly follow the guidelines for Publishing drafts. The article as it is, while certainly notable, has poor quality and significant bias. I recommend putting it back into the draft namespace for further improvement. -- Ideophagous ( talk) 13:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Good day! Thank you reviewing Draft:Vict0ny earlier. I saw your comment and went to work to sourcing the part you mentioned. I did that already, if you have some time, I'd appreciate if you can check it out again. Super grateful as this is an important learning opportunity for me. Thanks again -- Olakunle Rufai ( talk) 16:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Slywriter ( talk) 17:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Hello, Dege31
Thank you for creating Krvavac II.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 14:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Dege31
Thank you for creating Krvavac.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 14:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Actually the previous mentions were addressed. The article has now more than Nokia sources. It absolutely shows notability (one of the biggest batteries).
I really wonder why all the shitty Samsung budget smartphone articles become approved, which are way worse than the article I've written.
Wikipedia clearly measures with double standards. 46.114.104.141 ( talk) 13:27, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Dege31!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
06:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
|
On 31 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Angolan general election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 06:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, with refer to your deletion of the subjected article on 25 July 2022, could please review its re-submission? It was deleted due to lack of references and now adequate references (nine in number) are added. Thank you. Nir007H ( talk) 04:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Heyyy!!! I wanted to see if you can help take a look at this draft I submitted for review Draft:Dotts Media House. I'm still looking at ways to make it better. However, I really believe it is ready to be published. Kindly help take a look if you can as this will also improve my editing as well. Thank you very much. Olakunle Rufai ( talk) 22:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of spurious inventions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Boleyn (
talk)
08:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Category:People of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 20:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of spurious inventions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Dan arndt (
talk)
09:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Dege31:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Afghan people by period has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 16:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Branimir Nestorović. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm| (tαlk) 05:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm discussing with another wiki person about how many POC and its allies pages are being systematically deleted by other wikipedians. We were discussing it off wiki on reddit. If you'd be interested in joining our team to help Wikipedia properly maintain articles that are linked to diverse voices and stories, message me on reddit here: https://www.reddit.com/user/Jujucabana25/ Juju ( talk) 18:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Here's a brownie for your efforts | |
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 6 reviews, for a total of 8.5 points. – robertsky ( talk) 06:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC) |
– robertsky (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
– robertsky ( talk) 06:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Dege31, recently you've reviewed my articles and left a message how to fix it. I'm not sure if I did it correctly, so can you please look at the articles and say if the problems are fixed.
Draft:Dora (Russian singer) (Here I deleted references to interview and added the link to last.fm website)
Draft:All - Russian Olympiad of schoolchildren (here I added English sourses that I can find and that are relevant to the topic) Кокушев Сергей ( talk) 06:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Dege31. Thank you for your work on List of spurious inventions. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I had wondered whether 'spurious inventions' was quite the right term, as most of these seems to be hoaxes. However, the less pejorative 'spurious' is slightly broader and less contentious - an appropriate choice. It's likely that this list could be significantly expanded. When referencing, consider a formatting style that reduces the duplication you had in the reference list (I've done this using template:rp
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
|
A tag has been placed on Category:2021 US Open Series indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Murray. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (2004–2021) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Firestar464 (
talk)
03:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:October 2021 events in Thailand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
-- 17:21, Sunday, August 29, 2021 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paraconsistent logic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page If.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
1.) In case you haven't seen it, I only mentioned northern cyprus twice in the section in the article Muslim romani people, so I deleted one mention.
2.) Rom is not called man in romanes language, it means Husband. Man means Djeno. Roma in Coptic means human, you can read about it, on wikipedia coptic language and everywhere.
3.) Ottoman or Turkish culture is the same for the Muslim roma at the Balkans.
4.) That there was once a separate sandjak for muslim roma at the Ottoman empire, is actually a general knowledge, why do you need to source? ???
5.) The Romanlar in Turkey are Sunni Muslims of Hanafi Madhab, there are no christian roma group in Turkey. So why you always wrote today and mostly in the Article ??? today and mostly in which case? What you want to say with this phrases ? It is also known that the majority of Turkish-speaking roma, especially in bulgaria, describe themselves as turks and deny their roma origins. Please read the article of the roma in bulgaria on wikipedia.
Your non-roma makes no distinction between the various roma groups. You throw them all in one pot, the only example you non roma people use are the vlax roma from romania. However, the majority of the roma are not vlax roma from romania. There is no single origin theory that all diverse roma groups accept, almost every group has its own myth of origin. Especially based on the country where the roma live in since centurys and which religion they belong to.
I hope you are satisfied when I get banned. Anyway, it's no longer fun on wikipedia, there are so many self-proclaimed historians who just refuse to allow other opinions. As for sources, if self-proclaimed non-Roma historians are used as a source because they publish books, articles, etc., should that be considered the truth? Also the fabricated word romani in english, what is that supposed to be? The word Romani or Romanes, actually refers to the language, not the people. However, many Roma groups do not refer to themselves as Roma, but by other names.
-- Nalanidil ( talk) 13:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
As I already mentioned, the knowledge of these sources is based on only one group, namely the Vlax Roma from Romania, their culture, religion, way of life, myths etc., are unfortunately transferred to all other non-Vlax Roma by self-appointed non-Roma historians. And that makes me angry.
Nalanidil (
talk)
19:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
There are 18 reliable sources for the subject of Bahara alavi which are independent and have significant coverage for that. why are not Wikipedia's users able to see those sources? it is so confusing. Khabat4545 ( talk) 13:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
You reviewed and rejected my submitted article. One thing you asked was to prove the name "Airport Road" was named due to the presence of an airport. Will this do (2nd link at end)?
"Airport Road is designated as Peel Road 7 and named for Toronto Pearson International Airport in Mississauga, near where it begins."
I have more to ask, but this for now. Transportfan70 ( talk) 19:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia has a policy regarding the obvious: Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue. Transportfan70 ( talk) 03:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Me again. I corrected two of the issues. But what do you mean that Google Maps is not reliable and uses copyright traps? Transportfan70 ( talk) 04:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
But these link to satellite photos of major cities. How can they be fake? For one thing, they can't be fake "ghost areas" as I wouldn't even have a basis to write an article if they were, as I wouldn't even think of looking for them.
That's some tough review criteria! Transportfan70 ( talk) 18:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't really think there is anything else, as municipalities don't tend to put detailed maps online, and if they do you can't link to the zoomed-in area specifically. Transportfan70 ( talk) 01:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Have you made a decision yet? Transportfan70 ( talk)
Is the article good to go? If so, when will you move it to the article space? Transportfan70 ( talk) 03:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
I took care of those. Transportfan70 ( talk) 01:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Transportfan70 ( talk) 02:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
North Kosovo crisis (2021) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Eviolite --
Eviolite (
talk)
03:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
North Kosovo crisis (2021) you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:North Kosovo crisis (2021) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Eviolite --
Eviolite (
talk)
08:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
2021 North Kosovo crisis you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:2021 North Kosovo crisis for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Eviolite --
Eviolite (
talk)
21:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
2021 North Kosovo crisis you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:2021 North Kosovo crisis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.
eviolite
(talk)
06:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)On 14 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 North Kosovo crisis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the series of protests that led to the 2021 North Kosovo crisis was caused by a ban on Serbian license plates from the Kosovan Government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 North Kosovo crisis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, 2021 North Kosovo crisis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Influenza A virus subtype H5N6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDC.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in the Take the Lead contest. You are one of the winners and to sort out the prize could you email me at karla.marte@wikimedia.org.uk to coordinate. Karla Marte(WMUK) ( talk) 11:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I hope I'm not bothering you, I saw that you approved my AfC submission for Favorite (Vampire but the title of the page in the mainspace doesn't have the final bracket and I can't move it to its actual name. I'm new to Wikipedia, so I wanted to ask if there was a reason for it or if it's just an error. Thank you! Poirot09 ( talk) 17:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ Dege31:. I don't get why you onesidedly accepted the draft for Tajine Zitoun as it is, when several comments highlighted the flaws with the article, namely the improper use of sources. I also think you didn't properly follow the guidelines for Publishing drafts. The article as it is, while certainly notable, has poor quality and significant bias. I recommend putting it back into the draft namespace for further improvement. -- Ideophagous ( talk) 13:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Good day! Thank you reviewing Draft:Vict0ny earlier. I saw your comment and went to work to sourcing the part you mentioned. I did that already, if you have some time, I'd appreciate if you can check it out again. Super grateful as this is an important learning opportunity for me. Thanks again -- Olakunle Rufai ( talk) 16:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Slywriter ( talk) 17:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Hello, Dege31
Thank you for creating Krvavac II.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 14:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Dege31
Thank you for creating Krvavac.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 14:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Actually the previous mentions were addressed. The article has now more than Nokia sources. It absolutely shows notability (one of the biggest batteries).
I really wonder why all the shitty Samsung budget smartphone articles become approved, which are way worse than the article I've written.
Wikipedia clearly measures with double standards. 46.114.104.141 ( talk) 13:27, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Dege31!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
06:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
|
On 31 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Angolan general election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 06:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, with refer to your deletion of the subjected article on 25 July 2022, could please review its re-submission? It was deleted due to lack of references and now adequate references (nine in number) are added. Thank you. Nir007H ( talk) 04:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Heyyy!!! I wanted to see if you can help take a look at this draft I submitted for review Draft:Dotts Media House. I'm still looking at ways to make it better. However, I really believe it is ready to be published. Kindly help take a look if you can as this will also improve my editing as well. Thank you very much. Olakunle Rufai ( talk) 22:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of spurious inventions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Boleyn (
talk)
08:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Category:People of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 20:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of spurious inventions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Dan arndt (
talk)
09:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Dege31:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Afghan people by period has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 16:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Branimir Nestorović. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm| (tαlk) 05:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm discussing with another wiki person about how many POC and its allies pages are being systematically deleted by other wikipedians. We were discussing it off wiki on reddit. If you'd be interested in joining our team to help Wikipedia properly maintain articles that are linked to diverse voices and stories, message me on reddit here: https://www.reddit.com/user/Jujucabana25/ Juju ( talk) 18:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Here's a brownie for your efforts | |
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 6 reviews, for a total of 8.5 points. – robertsky ( talk) 06:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC) |
– robertsky (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
– robertsky ( talk) 06:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Dege31, recently you've reviewed my articles and left a message how to fix it. I'm not sure if I did it correctly, so can you please look at the articles and say if the problems are fixed.
Draft:Dora (Russian singer) (Here I deleted references to interview and added the link to last.fm website)
Draft:All - Russian Olympiad of schoolchildren (here I added English sourses that I can find and that are relevant to the topic) Кокушев Сергей ( talk) 06:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Dege31. Thank you for your work on List of spurious inventions. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I had wondered whether 'spurious inventions' was quite the right term, as most of these seems to be hoaxes. However, the less pejorative 'spurious' is slightly broader and less contentious - an appropriate choice. It's likely that this list could be significantly expanded. When referencing, consider a formatting style that reduces the duplication you had in the reference list (I've done this using template:rp
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)