This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | → | Archive 60 |
Crisco, sebagai penyunting pada versi en.wiki-nya, tolong donk Anda koreksi hasil terjemahan ini: id:Kampoeng Rawa What a joke ( talk) 04:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Bang, karena hari ini adalah tanggal 1 Oktober, jadi saya mengucapkan selamat Hari Kesaktian Nasional kepada abang. Saya menyampaikan hal yang unik karena artikel yang sama telah dipajang di dua Wikipedia yang berbeda pada hari yang sama pula. Kemarin, di HU Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, artikel pilihan saat itu adalah Penumpasan Pengkhianatan G 30 S PKI ( id:Wikipedia:Artikel pilihan/27 2014), sementara itu HU Wikipedia bahasa Inggris menayangkan Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI ( Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 30, 2014). Hal yang sama juga pernah terjadi sebelumnya di Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia dan Wikipedia bahasa Melayu di mana artikel id:Amir Hamzah dan ms:Amir Hamzah tayang bersama selama 6 hari, yaitu 1 September - 6 September (Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia - id:Wikipedia:Artikel pilihan/24 2014, Wikipedia bahasa Melayu - ms:Wikipedia:Calon rencana pilihan/September). Terima kasih. Hanamanteo ( talk) 07:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you're well. I was wondering what the rules are for how many nominations you can have at DYK concurrently, do you have to wait for your previous nom to be reviewed before submitting a new one? Cowlibob ( talk) 16:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Do you know Tsuguharu Foujita? Japaneses painter who lived in Paris, but nobody cares for him, it looks like to me, no pictures uploaded at all. Well, 1. Hafspajen ( talk) 16:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC) http://www.wikiart.org/en/tsuguharu-foujita/self-portrait-1 http://www.wikiart.org/en/tsuguharu-foujita http://www.departures.com/articles/lost-art https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8WbJ-zMOKg
Hi Crisco, I've got an FAC underway at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Carl Hans Lody/archive1 - I'm hoping to have the article ready for the Main Page by November 6, the centenary of Lody's death. I'd value your input on any issues that might exist with the article; would you be able to have a look at it? Prioryman ( talk) 21:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
On 2 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article September Morn, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that September Morn survived the October Revolution, caused widespread controversy in the United States, and was featured on bottle openers, calendars, and candy boxes, but is now in a warehouse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/September Morn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
This annoys me on many levels...-- Godot13 ( talk) 23:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Not going to edit war with on this but this is not what WP:As of is for. I would appreciate if you would not revert when we were still discussing that. You just blew of what I was saying and simply changed it as if what I am saying had no merit.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 07:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco, please accept my apologies for my ill-thought by well-meaning edit and my thanks for reverting to the latest correct version. I should have done exactly as you did but without thinking just deleted the spurious vandalism without replacing the Errors stuff. Sorry again. Careful With That Axe, Eugene Hello... 08:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
What's the etiquette on resubmitting pictures that weren't featured the first time (probably only due to lack of comments)? I was just looking at the Inupiat pic that's scheduled for October 12 and I saw there is another great portrait in the Inuit article, but you'd already nominated it once (the nomination got bogged down in discussing who she was and where she came from and what her ethnicity was and nobody but you ever voted definitively). Why don't you nominate her again if that is allowed (her lovely parka alone should qualify her for FP). Belle ( talk) 09:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Holy smoke, he really did painted bathing women. Anyone of those? (You can of course remove them - if you think they are offending) Hafspajen ( talk) 16:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Surely one of these could be (literally) brushed up to FP status...? - SchroCat ( talk) 14:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Manjuvajramandala con 43 divinità - Unknown - Google Cultural Institute.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Crisco, I was wondering if you would please take a look at this DYK nomination, which is now one of our oldest. If it isn't adequately cited for DYK, which seems to be Miyagawa's view, then it's unlikely to get any further. If there are other serious issues, likewise. If the citations are sufficient, then we should probably call for a new reviewer. Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Still interested in the McKinsey & Company article? Getting so close to GAN-ready I can taste it. I'm probably pestering you way too much, but you seem to tolerate me so well ;-)
If you have a few minutes to spare, I've also been trying to find someone to trim some poorly-sourced contentious material from the Realplayer page ( see here) since the 17th. The top half of the "Controversies" section looks like it has legit content, but the bottom half is mostly garbage and there's a huge plug for "Real alternative" in its own section just using junk sources. I won't be bringing this up to GA or anything. I am just doing some much more basic stuff for them, getting high-quality logos in place and correcting infobox data sort of stuff, and a couple more substantial things like this. CorporateM ( Talk) 19:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Would mind terrible clarifying a statement I made here Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Presidents of the United States (1789–1909). The comment could have been made by any newbie. It's the person making the comment that threw me for a bit of a loop...-- Godot13 ( talk) 08:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
He's gone, this? Hafspajen ( talk) 09:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco-
I just wanted to clarify that in one of the FP debate threads you mentioned that the limit for simultaneous nominations is 11? - Godot13 ( talk) 19:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Has a huge absurd white space at bottom of article - and I a clueless oz strylian cannot work out why, any ideas? satusuro 13:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
On 5 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beauty Revealed, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1828 self-portrait Beauty Revealed, by Sarah Goodridge (pictured), has been considered to "erase" her body by drawing attention to her breasts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beauty Revealed. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beauty Revealed you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn ( talk) 15:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic. Alsee ( talk) 16:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
We ignore Paul Gauguin? .. Tahitian Women on the Beach. Hafspajen ( talk) 16:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
I seem to recall there's a Gauguin scan on, of all places, the Library of Congress. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 20:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco, could you have a look at Bulldog if you get the chance, please? Earlier this morning I asked for Pending Changes to be considered for it as there has been a lot of too-ing and fro-ing. Lengthy discussion on the talk page but it seems IPs are changing it (twice this morning). I have just reverted ... SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) PS: Bulldogs aren't even a breed I have a vast interest in!
I'm not entirely sure what you are fishing after, having said that, where have I stated "Me and a friend of mine are reverting the article back to its state prior to these mass edits"? It is not something I recognize. Furthermore, you say you are UK based, well, in my experience most people have referred to the dog as "English bulldog", both in England and abroad, not to suggest that personal experience should have the final say. Vallonen ( talk) 11:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco-
Regarding this, what are your thoughts since no one offered an opinion there...-- Godot13 ( talk) 00:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Jean-François Millet - Gleaners - Google Art Project 2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
16:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
|
My eyes are revolting, going on strike. I will send you a message tomorrow to help me understand what others can and can not claim points for... confused, but mainly tired.... Godot13 ( talk) 06:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jacobus Anthonie Meessen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson ( talk) 02:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Jacobus Anthonie Meessen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jacobus Anthonie Meessen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson ( talk) 05:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
I was actually thinking about that joke earlier and decided to look up the airline food article. Was impressed with the main image it had. GamerPro64 20:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Rubens Peale with his geranium, is your fault. Hafspajen ( talk) 18:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid none of us are quie sure what you mean here. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 21:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
This will be tricky. I'm trying to approach this holistically - creating clear guidelines on what can be in these categories. However, there are some editors who don't really care about that - they just don't want any concession that men were victims from a gendered (ie, it was because they were men) view. To me, it's a narrow, somewhat academic view, considering what categories should be used for (cross referencing articles that are topical). Any suggestions? Mattnad ( talk) 14:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
There has been an ongoing debate about the appropriate use of Against Men category with Wikipedia articles. The locus of the conflict has been 2014 Isla Vista killings, but it has spread to other articles as well.
After extended discussions, there are two camps.
We are looking for feedback on the following:
--What do you think?
Mattnad (
talk)
19:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
The violence against men category, and its use in Wikipedia articles, has been subject to debate and edit warring. The locus of the conflict has been 2014 Isla Vista killings, but it has spread to other articles as well (including Domestic violence against men, Prison rape in the United States, Srebrenica massacre, and Jeffrey Dahmer).
Two main arguments have been put forth:
A further complication is the concern that the correlative category, violence against women, and its subcategories are sometimes included when the terms "misogyny" are not used in reliable sources, or that the violence is not explicitly stated to be "gendered" (in that the women were harmed because of their female gender). This concern has been noted at such articles as Kendall Francois and the Death of Jennifer Ann Crecente.
This RFC is to determine the following:
Also, do you think we should note that there are general sanctions in the area? Something like "Please note that similar questions have been controversial before, and that general sanctions apply to all pages related to the men's rights movement."? — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
*Thanks for the suggestion. I'll be sure we leave a notification there (and at Category talk:Violence against women) — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 01:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Nicolaas Pieneman - The Submission of Prince Dipo Negoro to General De Kock.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
|
I'm using a New York Times ProQuest database and need to cite articles over the last century. Each article is copyrighted (problem archiving mass numbers of them) and the url is membership access. The standard newspaper citation template does not come with a page number option. Can I add one? It seems there is some degree of AGF involved with this...-- Godot13 ( talk) 00:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |subscription=
ignored (|url-access=
suggested) (
help) (i.e. {{cite news |title=253 FPs in a Year? Yes! |work=The New York Times |last=Smith |first=Jane |page=2 | date=9 October 2014|url=/info/en/?search=Special:Watchlist|via=[[ProQuest]] |subscription=yes}}. {{
Cite news}} has a lot of parameters that aren't often used, and some that are but only for offline sources.. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk)
00:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, I don't feel I can do anything more trying to move this nomination along: I tried pinging Andy on his talk page and ran into a brick wall (see User talk:Pigsonthewing#DYK nomination of Heath Town for the details). RTG says there are copyvios and close paraphrasing, and I can confirm that the first two paragraphs of History are indeed copyvios, and introduced during the expansion. While I can't get FN1 to work myself (I get a 404 error), it does show up with the identical phrases on Google, and the requisite phrases also show up at other sites including this one, and an archive dates April 30 of this year, well before the expansion started. I'll let you decide what the next step is here. Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 03:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco 1492. I'm currently working on the Jimly Asshiddiqie article, and I noticed that he and an number of other eminent Indonesian people have the post-nominal "S.H." and variants like "SH" and so on. I don't have a clue what this stands for, but I've looked it up in Wikipedia, that so-called "online encyclopedia about the sum of human knowledge", and it has nothing at all that helps me about what " S.H." might mean in this context. Your thoughts? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Chris—the downcasers normally have it, but here, Dicklyon is suggesting disambiguation too, presumably with an analogue to the Dutch WP (fotografie). Would that be your take, too?
The adoration of the Empty Cross is a rather unusual topic. Don't think we have it - is it free? from MET. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
..Ahem .. well, yes. Is a rather unusual. Category Nicolas Froment or so. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Guerin Jeune fille en buste.jpg Hafspajen ( talk) 22:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
File:François Barraud - La Toilette.jpg Could you please help me move Dr Hill into mainspace as Jonathan Hill (theologian)? Don't know how ... We have now picture and it is fairly OK - refs and everyrthing. User:Hafspajen/Jonathan Hill (theologian) - Don't know if he is prepared for a DYK - that nasty place... though. What do you think? Hafspajen ( talk) 12:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
After a long absence, he's back begging. Jhall1 and I have been working for what seems like years on Jack Crawford (cricketer). All I can say is that Crawford isn't a Yorkshireman, I'd appreciate any comments on the talk page (no formal PR here) and favours gratefully returned if wanted. It feels choppy to me, so feel free to tear into it. (And as you probably aren't aware, the above section title refers to this) Sarastro1 ( talk) 19:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
http://www.loc.gov/search/?fa=contributor%3Awhistler%2C+james+mcneill
Lots of good stuff there. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 20:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Went out with my wife today to hunt bugs. Haven't uploaded any of those yet, but they're on the way. Here's some food and a temple to wait. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
‑‑ Mandruss ( talk) 07:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco,
I have nominated one more photograph related to Indian classical dance, I hope you will notice it soon. Expecting your ususal help, if needed to the photograph, because, am a bit worried about the sharpness of the photograph.
Hope you will help me out.
Regards Bellus Delphina talk 10:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
A Basket of Berries by Sarah Miriam Peale Award | |
A Basket of Berries by Sarah Miriam Peale for you as a thank you. Hafspajen ( talk) 16:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC) |
Work it , it's yours. Hafspajen ( talk) 13:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hafspajen ( talk) 16:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! If you have a moment, would you mind looking in at Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop#Pierre Bernac photograph and giving us your expert opinion one way or the other? Tim riley talk 20:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
On 11 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Submission of Prince Dipo Negoro to General De Kock, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, in their depictions of the capture of Diponegoro, Nicolaas Pieneman portrayed him as submissive (pictured), while Raden Saleh represented him as defiant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Submission of Prince Dipo Negoro to General De Kock. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
On 11 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Arrest of Pangeran Diponegoro, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, in their depictions of the capture of Diponegoro, Nicolaas Pieneman portrayed him as submissive (pictured), while Raden Saleh represented him as defiant? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey Crisco. I just thought I would check-in and see if you wanted to keep working on this with me over the weekend. It still has the obviously POV (and now redundant) "Criticisms of Management Advice" section. I think the information is all on the page and I'm just culling through it to get it GA ready. I also need to write a Lede eventually. If I'm being a bother and you're not interested, just let me know! I feel like this one has been hard to find editors that will engage long-term, because it is not the kind of topic that appeals to a lot of people. North8000 would probably have taken an interest if he wasn't banned for a year. CorporateM ( Talk) 16:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Posthumous Portrait of Herman Willem Daendels, Governor-General of the Dutch East Indies - Rd Saleh.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
06:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
|
hi, can you remove the small watermark on it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Silver certificate (Cuba) -- Godot13 ( talk) 04:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Crisco. I don't suppose you could help with the five paintings? Trying to get this done ASAP, so I can start ignoring it until next weekend. =) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 03:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Beauty Revealed you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beauty Revealed for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn ( talk) 15:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you have a category on your userpage stating that you are willing to userfy certain deleted Wikipedia articles. If that's the case, can you please userfy Manky Kong and the latest deleted 2005 revision of Tiny Kong? 2005-Fan ( talk) 16:29, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, for the first time in a long time, none of the queues are filled, but for perhaps the first time ever, all six preps are filled. If you're around in the next few hours, it would be great if you could promote a queue or two, and even better if you can do so before the bot posts that a queue is desperately needed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, I was wondering if I could ask you to please check the appropriateness of the sourcing for the hook fact in this seven-article hook. Specifically, it's the list of names here of "Gator Greats"—just names and sport(s), with nothing indicating year of induction. At the moment, Tony's awaiting a verdict on whether the source is reliable before continuing with the review, and I've never run into anything like this before, so I don't feel I can say yea or nay. (Is this kind of award often given not by the University, but by an external group? Does it matter who gives it?) BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Some results from my trip to Bandungan. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
That butterfly is some sort of grass yellow (look at me, the butterfly expert; I can also identify about five other types, including a white one and a brown one). Belle ( talk) 10:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Bonshō finally made it to FA - wouldn't have done so if your image review hadn't gotten things started. Thank you tremendously for your help. Yunshui 雲 水 09:19, 13 October 2014 (UTC) |
...In short this happy country has been Anglicized completely.
So, Luke Fildes, friend of W. S. Gilbert - hence the reference to him being a nobleman in the song about the idealized England being claimed as real to foreigners - was actually quite a good painter. We don't have a lot on him of quality. one portraits of him by Philip Alexius de László:
And two portraits by him:
I note Paul Fildes was unillustrated, so I've added the painting in. I say that'd be a good nomination, no? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 23:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC) Like Frederick. Hafspajen ( talk) 23:53, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Decided to make a new thread about this. Since we were discussing sourcing for the page, good man JimmyBlackwing put some sources in the articles talk page. The mans a saint in that department. GamerPro64 19:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Sarah Goodridge Beauty Revealed The Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Hey, Crisco! I see you undid my revision of the blurb for the HAM— fair enough, the revision was very late in the game, but it is not on the main page yet (not for another few hours still!). I don't know if you will be up and checking things there in Indonesia before it DOES hit the main page— will I be in trouble if I undo your undoing and put the revised text back in before that happens? I had been reading over the blurbs for other PotDs and felt like the one for the mollusc sounded less friendly than them and wanted it to read more as part of the set. So I am going to switch the blurb back quick before the image hits the main page, and hope that this doesn't get me in any trouble— please, please switch it back (again) if I am violating any kind of protocol (social or organizational) by doing so. And thank you again for your support and help and ability to pay attention to all this stuff (how do you DO it??). KDS4444 Talk 18:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Wish we could find something like this - but this is too small. Hafspajen ( talk) 11:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC) PS Did you crop Butters pup? Where is it? At Phils.
Ah. That explains it. Hafspajen ( talk) 11:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Any good? You can have them.
And you? Hafspajen ( talk) 23:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC) Not happy? these are very fine elephants, almost FP... Hafspajen ( talk) 19:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hear the news about the cave paintings in Sulawesi? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 00:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok. Crisco, somebody made a mistake on sheeps, it is mm not cm. Hafspajen ( talk) 00:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, Fram just pulled two hooks from Queue 5, but did not replace them—worse, he left the entries there with just an ellipsis, so there are effectively two blank lines. I'm way past my bedtime, so I'm going to hope that you log on before noon UTC, or that someone else finds and fixes the queue. Thanks if you see this and can fix it before it's too late. BlueMoonset ( talk) 07:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
If I scanned yesterday in 48-bit color, would that be the reason a file I've been trying to upload won't go through? Should the number be dialed down in photoshop? Thanks.-- Godot13 ( talk) 13:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
This is to inform you that Ruma Maida, which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Wikipedia Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 28 October 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:PORTRAIT OF CHARLES HODGE, Rembrandt Peale.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
12:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Hey Crisco, just wanted a second opinion on a nomination. I wanted to nominate either a single image or a set from a church during my trip to Lithuania. It was either going to be the 'lead interior image', or all four interior images as a set. I haven't had much luck with sets recently though, and I think they're probably a bit polarising for voters. People don't necessarily want to support all the images (particularly if there are some weaker images in the set) but can't justify an oppose vote either, so it ends up with less than the required 5 votes instead. So it seems that generally speaking, single images are more successful. But in the case of this subject, I feel all four images are pretty high quality and work fairly well as a set, so it's difficult to say any one is better or worse than another. However, the article just barely has enough content to support the images (took a bit of expansion and creative placements to make them fit) in the main body, and it's proven difficult to find more info in English on the church, so I could see an argument that four images is excessive. Your thoughts? Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:32, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco! I don't know if you remember me (I was Jagadhatri when I first met you) but I need a help (a big help) from you. Actually I'm working on Bade Achhe Lagte Hain so that it becomes a GA. And there are also some non-free media issues. Could you please help me?? Please don't say no! By the way I love (I literally love it) your page notice...aaha! It made my day..it touched my heart. Love you Crisco...thank you for making my day..I have similar quotes and pictures on my userpage. I love such images and quotes. Thank you for making my day! Love you Crisco! -- Tamravidhir ( talk!) 14:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Crisco, after some soul-searching I have replaced the lead image in Otto I. I am fairly sure, I can get used to the pillar :) (atleast the statue is neatly centered). If you have any additional ideas for tweaking, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks for your help with this image. GermanJoe ( talk) 22:19, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
What do you think of this? (If you want to make changes, please do them from the PNG) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 06:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, I posted to your talk page earlier in the week, hoping I could ask you to please check the appropriateness of the sourcing for the hook fact in this seven-article hook. Specifically, it's the list of names here of "Gator Greats"—just names and sport(s), with nothing indicating year of induction. Reviewer TonyTheTiger is awaiting a verdict from me on whether the source is reliable before continuing with the review, and I've never run into anything like this before, so I don't feel I can say yea or nay. (Is this kind of award often given not by the University, but by an external/alumni group? Does it matter who gives it?) Is this something you can handle, or should I try Nikkimaria? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
on the Japanese invasion currency (may have filled up Burma and Malaya, still nothing on Indonesia). Found guilder card money on St. Martin and a few other things that aren't in the standard reference books...-- Godot13 ( talk) 02:03, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
I think George Hamilton (South Australian police) might be in the picture - but who is the painter? Hafspajen ( talk) 14:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
A staple of diners and fast-food restaurants, cheeseburgers were first popularized in the United States during the 1920s and 30s, but they existed long before. |
.find File:1917 Modigliani Reclining nude anagoria.JPG - big and bad Hafspajen ( talk) 15:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Eh, maybe THIS or this. Hafspajen ( talk) 15:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Oedipus and the Sphinx 1864.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
|
P.S. I found the Japanese invasion money for the Netherlands Indies...-- Godot13 ( talk) 03:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
What great work at Japanese occupation of the Dutch East Indies. Thanks. Drmies ( talk) 03:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
Jack Crawford is now at FAC here. Any further comments more than welcome! Sarastro1 ( talk) 12:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, we're almost three hours past the time the next queue should have been promoted, and while there are two preps ready, the queues are empty. Can you please promote one? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 14:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco! I just wanted to ask that how many sets of DYK are selected for each day? Is it like this that set one will be featured on the main page from "so and so" time to "so and so" time and then set two and set three during another time period? I mean that how many sets are there? And who decides and how do they decide that when which one will show up? Could you please tell me? Tamravidhir ( talk!) 15:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Is your ping not working or something? Have you seen Black Sunday (1960 film)? Perhaps Giano has seen it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
We still have over nine hours before the next DYK promotion is scheduled, but there aren't any filled queues, though plenty of filled preps. If you have the time, it would be great to have a queue or two ready to go. Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:16, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, thanks for your previous help for me to promote the Chinese version of the article The Jakarta Post as a good article. This time I have to counter with another problem concerning the article Ouw Peh Tjoa. I have translate the article into Chinese, and now it is a candidate of good article in zhwp. A specialist in literature, history and philosophy has reviewed the article, and one of his comment is like that:
...the content is insubstantial and a expansion is needed; what is the difference between the film's plot and the original Chinese folklore? Who are the actors? Are they Chinese? How successful the film is (in terms of profit) (in Indonesia and Singapore)? How do the critics comment on it? What is the feature of its action scene? ...
Also, he stated that this two sentence is irrelevant to the topic:
... a year after Albert Balink's Pareh changed domestic perceptions of profitable film storylines. The's later films adapted stories closer to the native populace of the Indies and focussing on events that could happen in day-to-day life.[5] Through 1940 and 1941 Java Industrial Films was the most productive studio in the Indies, until it was shut down during the Japanese occupation which began in March 1942.[10]
... Biran writes that several Japanese propaganda films have survived at the Netherlands Government Information Service.[14]
I initially cited from the article that the cast is not recorded, but not sure that is it a concrete statement. Also, I promised him to seek advice from you, as you are an expert on Indonesian films. Could you please help for dealing these issues? Much thanks and sorry for inconvenience, -- Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 15:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco! Scallops in November? Can you make it so?? KDS4444 Talk 07:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco- When you have a chance, could you take a look at this. Probably my last nom for the Cup...-- Godot13 ( talk) 00:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Value | Art/progress proofs | Certified proofs | Portrait |
---|---|---|---|
1 peso |
José Martí | ||
Also, if we're focusing on the banknote, why not a hard crop? — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 01:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Isn't this a lovely copy? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 03:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
On 20 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pah Wongso, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the social worker Pah Wongso turned an extortion charge into a 25-cent fine and a school for impoverished youth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pah Wongso. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 14:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Maybe this? [2]... Looks like a good picture. Hafspajen ( talk) 17:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco,
How will I be able to upload a file that big? Do you know the procedure? Étienne Dolet ( talk) 06:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
I have a bad cold. Is there any chance I could beg some help this week? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 18:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, we're again in a position where we have five preps filled (minus one quirky spot), but no queues. In about four hours, the bot will go looking for something to promote; if you're around before then and no one else has done any promoting, can you please take care of one? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Chris, you (and your talk page stalkers) may be interested in a thread I've started about Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests#Gough_Whitlam, where possibilities for marking the death (aged 98) of this former prime minister of Australia include re-running a TFA. I'm interested in getting lots of views so I'll be leaving this note on various pages (and apologies, TPS-ers, if your talk page is not one of them!) Thanks, Bencherlite Talk 08:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
This would be a good picture for the Doctors new article, but we don't have it.. http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.154233.html ?is it snachable? Hafspajen ( talk) 13:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Edits | ||
...now that’s a lot of edits... |
But don't worry, with this series of BEP proofs I've got your milestones covered through 500,000,000...-- Godot13 ( talk) 18:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, congratulations on 100,000 errors edits! ‑‑
Mandruss (
t)
20:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
``` Buster Seven Talk 17:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Lots and lots of photos, many of them really quite terribly reproduced. Feel like talking things through and figuring out what to keep and what to lose/put into a gallery? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 06:35, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
It is unfortunate if an image is deleted from the front page. I know images in POTDs are protected earlier; but no idea how images in FA are handled. Any suggestion for improvement? J e e 03:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
BTW, could you confirm whether there was an active DR notice on the top of the file page when you deleted it? Or there was no such notice after first DR was closed? It will help as to find whether it was a negligence from the TFA team at EN– isn't exactly friendly. Bencherlite Talk 09:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
[Edit conflict, leaving this in, but it's partially irrelevant now] If you mean my comment (not Jkadevor's) "I think TFA has started checking new images, but not things that were there when it passed FAC. But I don't think the TFA people know image copyright that well, they depend on others to some extent." - this was a particularly finicky copyright issue. I work with image copyright all the time, and it's a situation I hadn't seen; I was perfectly happy to have it proven in copyright, but I also knew the documentation hadn't yet proven the status claimed for it, and had a couple funny issues (1949 date given for an award that, while backdated to 1949, was only announced and awarded in 1950, for instance). Wikipedia depends, to some extent, on trust. Unfortunately, the trust in this case was being hinged on a long accumulation of precedent, with no firm proof it was wrong, but a lot of reasons to doubt if you dug into it a lot. Does anyone seriously think you should spend hours on every TFA checking copyright minutiæ? Now, TFA's checks aren't perfect - you may remember the mislicenced image a bit ago that (while out of copyright) used a US-only tag for a European work, or vice-versa? It came up because ERRORS dropped the ball on it a bit when I reported the minor issue. [It got deleted from ERRORS without the problem being fixed.] But I don't see how they could be perfect, given the constant, never-ending TFA cycle. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 09:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC) [Close edit conflict] I think that it was useful to find out where the checks that would have identified the problem should have been: Should Commons have been more careful about the DR notice, or should we see about getting TFA better checks for DRs on Commons? Or both? "Negligence", however, was a very poor choice of words. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 09:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:George Peter Alexander Healy - John C. Calhoun - Google Art Project.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
12:37, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Crisco, the Talk:ExactTarget/GA1 page had gotten stranded when the ExactTarget article and talk pages were moved to Salesforce Marketing Cloud the other day, so I've just moved the GA review page to the new article name as well. BlueMoonset ( talk) 21:30, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Ii want your help regarding Krimuk90 and I know he is far more experienced, intelligent, respected and supported here. But, his main problem is favouritism. He had revereted all my edits from the article, whom I am one of the main contributor. I want to challenge all his articles as all his articles show favouritism and I can't say more. Please help.— Prashant 14:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)K
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article September Morn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 18:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
After water, tea is the most widely consumed beverage in the world. It can be enjoyed hot or cold, with milk or sugar. Hafspajen ( talk) 17:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
Better? Hafspajen ( talk) 23:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, this nomination is stalled, and I was hoping you could get it moving again. Thanks for anything you can do. Also, if you'd like to take a look at Template:Did you know nominations/Assassination of Gabriel Narutowicz to see whether the neutrality issue I found in the original hook is also a problem in the article (I don't have faith that the original reviewer would have found it given the failure in the hook), that would be great. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
No snachin, she's Crisco's. Hafspajen ( talk) 07:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nymphe_surprise - article in French. Hafspajen ( talk) 07:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
If you were going to replace File:Theodore_Rooseveltnewtry.jpg, would you go with the identical (but higher-resolution and quality) http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.36054/ or the slightly different angle, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.36051/ ? Or would you go for a more radical departure, such as http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2013651052/resource/ or http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/92520593/resource/ ?
Since you have participated in at least one Requested Move or Move Review discussion, either as participant or closer, regarding the title of the article currently at Sarah Jane Brown, you are being notified that there is another discussion about that going on now, at Talk:Sarah Jane Brown#Requested move #10. We hope we can finally achieve consensus among all participating about which title best meets policy and guidelines, and is not too objectionable. -- В²C ☎ 17:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Think I've found one last, really good copy of a Luke Fildes work. As it's probably the best of the three, I think that, once it's been in the article a week, we should nominate? Unless you want to join me in trying to make an article for it? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 02:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
CU confirmed. Drmies ( talk) 23:28, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Should have known. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 02:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | → | Archive 60 |
Crisco, sebagai penyunting pada versi en.wiki-nya, tolong donk Anda koreksi hasil terjemahan ini: id:Kampoeng Rawa What a joke ( talk) 04:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Bang, karena hari ini adalah tanggal 1 Oktober, jadi saya mengucapkan selamat Hari Kesaktian Nasional kepada abang. Saya menyampaikan hal yang unik karena artikel yang sama telah dipajang di dua Wikipedia yang berbeda pada hari yang sama pula. Kemarin, di HU Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, artikel pilihan saat itu adalah Penumpasan Pengkhianatan G 30 S PKI ( id:Wikipedia:Artikel pilihan/27 2014), sementara itu HU Wikipedia bahasa Inggris menayangkan Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI ( Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 30, 2014). Hal yang sama juga pernah terjadi sebelumnya di Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia dan Wikipedia bahasa Melayu di mana artikel id:Amir Hamzah dan ms:Amir Hamzah tayang bersama selama 6 hari, yaitu 1 September - 6 September (Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia - id:Wikipedia:Artikel pilihan/24 2014, Wikipedia bahasa Melayu - ms:Wikipedia:Calon rencana pilihan/September). Terima kasih. Hanamanteo ( talk) 07:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you're well. I was wondering what the rules are for how many nominations you can have at DYK concurrently, do you have to wait for your previous nom to be reviewed before submitting a new one? Cowlibob ( talk) 16:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Do you know Tsuguharu Foujita? Japaneses painter who lived in Paris, but nobody cares for him, it looks like to me, no pictures uploaded at all. Well, 1. Hafspajen ( talk) 16:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC) http://www.wikiart.org/en/tsuguharu-foujita/self-portrait-1 http://www.wikiart.org/en/tsuguharu-foujita http://www.departures.com/articles/lost-art https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8WbJ-zMOKg
Hi Crisco, I've got an FAC underway at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Carl Hans Lody/archive1 - I'm hoping to have the article ready for the Main Page by November 6, the centenary of Lody's death. I'd value your input on any issues that might exist with the article; would you be able to have a look at it? Prioryman ( talk) 21:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
On 2 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article September Morn, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that September Morn survived the October Revolution, caused widespread controversy in the United States, and was featured on bottle openers, calendars, and candy boxes, but is now in a warehouse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/September Morn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
This annoys me on many levels...-- Godot13 ( talk) 23:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Not going to edit war with on this but this is not what WP:As of is for. I would appreciate if you would not revert when we were still discussing that. You just blew of what I was saying and simply changed it as if what I am saying had no merit.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 07:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco, please accept my apologies for my ill-thought by well-meaning edit and my thanks for reverting to the latest correct version. I should have done exactly as you did but without thinking just deleted the spurious vandalism without replacing the Errors stuff. Sorry again. Careful With That Axe, Eugene Hello... 08:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
What's the etiquette on resubmitting pictures that weren't featured the first time (probably only due to lack of comments)? I was just looking at the Inupiat pic that's scheduled for October 12 and I saw there is another great portrait in the Inuit article, but you'd already nominated it once (the nomination got bogged down in discussing who she was and where she came from and what her ethnicity was and nobody but you ever voted definitively). Why don't you nominate her again if that is allowed (her lovely parka alone should qualify her for FP). Belle ( talk) 09:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Holy smoke, he really did painted bathing women. Anyone of those? (You can of course remove them - if you think they are offending) Hafspajen ( talk) 16:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Surely one of these could be (literally) brushed up to FP status...? - SchroCat ( talk) 14:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Manjuvajramandala con 43 divinità - Unknown - Google Cultural Institute.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Crisco, I was wondering if you would please take a look at this DYK nomination, which is now one of our oldest. If it isn't adequately cited for DYK, which seems to be Miyagawa's view, then it's unlikely to get any further. If there are other serious issues, likewise. If the citations are sufficient, then we should probably call for a new reviewer. Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Still interested in the McKinsey & Company article? Getting so close to GAN-ready I can taste it. I'm probably pestering you way too much, but you seem to tolerate me so well ;-)
If you have a few minutes to spare, I've also been trying to find someone to trim some poorly-sourced contentious material from the Realplayer page ( see here) since the 17th. The top half of the "Controversies" section looks like it has legit content, but the bottom half is mostly garbage and there's a huge plug for "Real alternative" in its own section just using junk sources. I won't be bringing this up to GA or anything. I am just doing some much more basic stuff for them, getting high-quality logos in place and correcting infobox data sort of stuff, and a couple more substantial things like this. CorporateM ( Talk) 19:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Would mind terrible clarifying a statement I made here Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Presidents of the United States (1789–1909). The comment could have been made by any newbie. It's the person making the comment that threw me for a bit of a loop...-- Godot13 ( talk) 08:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
He's gone, this? Hafspajen ( talk) 09:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco-
I just wanted to clarify that in one of the FP debate threads you mentioned that the limit for simultaneous nominations is 11? - Godot13 ( talk) 19:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Has a huge absurd white space at bottom of article - and I a clueless oz strylian cannot work out why, any ideas? satusuro 13:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
On 5 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beauty Revealed, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1828 self-portrait Beauty Revealed, by Sarah Goodridge (pictured), has been considered to "erase" her body by drawing attention to her breasts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beauty Revealed. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beauty Revealed you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn ( talk) 15:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic. Alsee ( talk) 16:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
We ignore Paul Gauguin? .. Tahitian Women on the Beach. Hafspajen ( talk) 16:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
I seem to recall there's a Gauguin scan on, of all places, the Library of Congress. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 20:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco, could you have a look at Bulldog if you get the chance, please? Earlier this morning I asked for Pending Changes to be considered for it as there has been a lot of too-ing and fro-ing. Lengthy discussion on the talk page but it seems IPs are changing it (twice this morning). I have just reverted ... SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) PS: Bulldogs aren't even a breed I have a vast interest in!
I'm not entirely sure what you are fishing after, having said that, where have I stated "Me and a friend of mine are reverting the article back to its state prior to these mass edits"? It is not something I recognize. Furthermore, you say you are UK based, well, in my experience most people have referred to the dog as "English bulldog", both in England and abroad, not to suggest that personal experience should have the final say. Vallonen ( talk) 11:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco-
Regarding this, what are your thoughts since no one offered an opinion there...-- Godot13 ( talk) 00:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Jean-François Millet - Gleaners - Google Art Project 2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
16:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
|
My eyes are revolting, going on strike. I will send you a message tomorrow to help me understand what others can and can not claim points for... confused, but mainly tired.... Godot13 ( talk) 06:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jacobus Anthonie Meessen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson ( talk) 02:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Jacobus Anthonie Meessen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jacobus Anthonie Meessen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson ( talk) 05:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
I was actually thinking about that joke earlier and decided to look up the airline food article. Was impressed with the main image it had. GamerPro64 20:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Rubens Peale with his geranium, is your fault. Hafspajen ( talk) 18:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid none of us are quie sure what you mean here. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 21:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
This will be tricky. I'm trying to approach this holistically - creating clear guidelines on what can be in these categories. However, there are some editors who don't really care about that - they just don't want any concession that men were victims from a gendered (ie, it was because they were men) view. To me, it's a narrow, somewhat academic view, considering what categories should be used for (cross referencing articles that are topical). Any suggestions? Mattnad ( talk) 14:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
There has been an ongoing debate about the appropriate use of Against Men category with Wikipedia articles. The locus of the conflict has been 2014 Isla Vista killings, but it has spread to other articles as well.
After extended discussions, there are two camps.
We are looking for feedback on the following:
--What do you think?
Mattnad (
talk)
19:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
The violence against men category, and its use in Wikipedia articles, has been subject to debate and edit warring. The locus of the conflict has been 2014 Isla Vista killings, but it has spread to other articles as well (including Domestic violence against men, Prison rape in the United States, Srebrenica massacre, and Jeffrey Dahmer).
Two main arguments have been put forth:
A further complication is the concern that the correlative category, violence against women, and its subcategories are sometimes included when the terms "misogyny" are not used in reliable sources, or that the violence is not explicitly stated to be "gendered" (in that the women were harmed because of their female gender). This concern has been noted at such articles as Kendall Francois and the Death of Jennifer Ann Crecente.
This RFC is to determine the following:
Also, do you think we should note that there are general sanctions in the area? Something like "Please note that similar questions have been controversial before, and that general sanctions apply to all pages related to the men's rights movement."? — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
*Thanks for the suggestion. I'll be sure we leave a notification there (and at Category talk:Violence against women) — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 01:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Nicolaas Pieneman - The Submission of Prince Dipo Negoro to General De Kock.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
|
I'm using a New York Times ProQuest database and need to cite articles over the last century. Each article is copyrighted (problem archiving mass numbers of them) and the url is membership access. The standard newspaper citation template does not come with a page number option. Can I add one? It seems there is some degree of AGF involved with this...-- Godot13 ( talk) 00:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |subscription=
ignored (|url-access=
suggested) (
help) (i.e. {{cite news |title=253 FPs in a Year? Yes! |work=The New York Times |last=Smith |first=Jane |page=2 | date=9 October 2014|url=/info/en/?search=Special:Watchlist|via=[[ProQuest]] |subscription=yes}}. {{
Cite news}} has a lot of parameters that aren't often used, and some that are but only for offline sources.. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk)
00:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, I don't feel I can do anything more trying to move this nomination along: I tried pinging Andy on his talk page and ran into a brick wall (see User talk:Pigsonthewing#DYK nomination of Heath Town for the details). RTG says there are copyvios and close paraphrasing, and I can confirm that the first two paragraphs of History are indeed copyvios, and introduced during the expansion. While I can't get FN1 to work myself (I get a 404 error), it does show up with the identical phrases on Google, and the requisite phrases also show up at other sites including this one, and an archive dates April 30 of this year, well before the expansion started. I'll let you decide what the next step is here. Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 03:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco 1492. I'm currently working on the Jimly Asshiddiqie article, and I noticed that he and an number of other eminent Indonesian people have the post-nominal "S.H." and variants like "SH" and so on. I don't have a clue what this stands for, but I've looked it up in Wikipedia, that so-called "online encyclopedia about the sum of human knowledge", and it has nothing at all that helps me about what " S.H." might mean in this context. Your thoughts? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Chris—the downcasers normally have it, but here, Dicklyon is suggesting disambiguation too, presumably with an analogue to the Dutch WP (fotografie). Would that be your take, too?
The adoration of the Empty Cross is a rather unusual topic. Don't think we have it - is it free? from MET. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
..Ahem .. well, yes. Is a rather unusual. Category Nicolas Froment or so. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Guerin Jeune fille en buste.jpg Hafspajen ( talk) 22:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
File:François Barraud - La Toilette.jpg Could you please help me move Dr Hill into mainspace as Jonathan Hill (theologian)? Don't know how ... We have now picture and it is fairly OK - refs and everyrthing. User:Hafspajen/Jonathan Hill (theologian) - Don't know if he is prepared for a DYK - that nasty place... though. What do you think? Hafspajen ( talk) 12:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
After a long absence, he's back begging. Jhall1 and I have been working for what seems like years on Jack Crawford (cricketer). All I can say is that Crawford isn't a Yorkshireman, I'd appreciate any comments on the talk page (no formal PR here) and favours gratefully returned if wanted. It feels choppy to me, so feel free to tear into it. (And as you probably aren't aware, the above section title refers to this) Sarastro1 ( talk) 19:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
http://www.loc.gov/search/?fa=contributor%3Awhistler%2C+james+mcneill
Lots of good stuff there. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 20:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Went out with my wife today to hunt bugs. Haven't uploaded any of those yet, but they're on the way. Here's some food and a temple to wait. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
‑‑ Mandruss ( talk) 07:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco,
I have nominated one more photograph related to Indian classical dance, I hope you will notice it soon. Expecting your ususal help, if needed to the photograph, because, am a bit worried about the sharpness of the photograph.
Hope you will help me out.
Regards Bellus Delphina talk 10:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
A Basket of Berries by Sarah Miriam Peale Award | |
A Basket of Berries by Sarah Miriam Peale for you as a thank you. Hafspajen ( talk) 16:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC) |
Work it , it's yours. Hafspajen ( talk) 13:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hafspajen ( talk) 16:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! If you have a moment, would you mind looking in at Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop#Pierre Bernac photograph and giving us your expert opinion one way or the other? Tim riley talk 20:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
On 11 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Submission of Prince Dipo Negoro to General De Kock, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, in their depictions of the capture of Diponegoro, Nicolaas Pieneman portrayed him as submissive (pictured), while Raden Saleh represented him as defiant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Submission of Prince Dipo Negoro to General De Kock. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
On 11 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Arrest of Pangeran Diponegoro, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, in their depictions of the capture of Diponegoro, Nicolaas Pieneman portrayed him as submissive (pictured), while Raden Saleh represented him as defiant? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey Crisco. I just thought I would check-in and see if you wanted to keep working on this with me over the weekend. It still has the obviously POV (and now redundant) "Criticisms of Management Advice" section. I think the information is all on the page and I'm just culling through it to get it GA ready. I also need to write a Lede eventually. If I'm being a bother and you're not interested, just let me know! I feel like this one has been hard to find editors that will engage long-term, because it is not the kind of topic that appeals to a lot of people. North8000 would probably have taken an interest if he wasn't banned for a year. CorporateM ( Talk) 16:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Posthumous Portrait of Herman Willem Daendels, Governor-General of the Dutch East Indies - Rd Saleh.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
06:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
|
hi, can you remove the small watermark on it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Silver certificate (Cuba) -- Godot13 ( talk) 04:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Crisco. I don't suppose you could help with the five paintings? Trying to get this done ASAP, so I can start ignoring it until next weekend. =) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 03:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Beauty Revealed you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beauty Revealed for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn ( talk) 15:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you have a category on your userpage stating that you are willing to userfy certain deleted Wikipedia articles. If that's the case, can you please userfy Manky Kong and the latest deleted 2005 revision of Tiny Kong? 2005-Fan ( talk) 16:29, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, for the first time in a long time, none of the queues are filled, but for perhaps the first time ever, all six preps are filled. If you're around in the next few hours, it would be great if you could promote a queue or two, and even better if you can do so before the bot posts that a queue is desperately needed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, I was wondering if I could ask you to please check the appropriateness of the sourcing for the hook fact in this seven-article hook. Specifically, it's the list of names here of "Gator Greats"—just names and sport(s), with nothing indicating year of induction. At the moment, Tony's awaiting a verdict on whether the source is reliable before continuing with the review, and I've never run into anything like this before, so I don't feel I can say yea or nay. (Is this kind of award often given not by the University, but by an external group? Does it matter who gives it?) BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Some results from my trip to Bandungan. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
That butterfly is some sort of grass yellow (look at me, the butterfly expert; I can also identify about five other types, including a white one and a brown one). Belle ( talk) 10:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Bonshō finally made it to FA - wouldn't have done so if your image review hadn't gotten things started. Thank you tremendously for your help. Yunshui 雲 水 09:19, 13 October 2014 (UTC) |
...In short this happy country has been Anglicized completely.
So, Luke Fildes, friend of W. S. Gilbert - hence the reference to him being a nobleman in the song about the idealized England being claimed as real to foreigners - was actually quite a good painter. We don't have a lot on him of quality. one portraits of him by Philip Alexius de László:
And two portraits by him:
I note Paul Fildes was unillustrated, so I've added the painting in. I say that'd be a good nomination, no? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 23:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC) Like Frederick. Hafspajen ( talk) 23:53, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Decided to make a new thread about this. Since we were discussing sourcing for the page, good man JimmyBlackwing put some sources in the articles talk page. The mans a saint in that department. GamerPro64 19:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Sarah Goodridge Beauty Revealed The Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Hey, Crisco! I see you undid my revision of the blurb for the HAM— fair enough, the revision was very late in the game, but it is not on the main page yet (not for another few hours still!). I don't know if you will be up and checking things there in Indonesia before it DOES hit the main page— will I be in trouble if I undo your undoing and put the revised text back in before that happens? I had been reading over the blurbs for other PotDs and felt like the one for the mollusc sounded less friendly than them and wanted it to read more as part of the set. So I am going to switch the blurb back quick before the image hits the main page, and hope that this doesn't get me in any trouble— please, please switch it back (again) if I am violating any kind of protocol (social or organizational) by doing so. And thank you again for your support and help and ability to pay attention to all this stuff (how do you DO it??). KDS4444 Talk 18:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Wish we could find something like this - but this is too small. Hafspajen ( talk) 11:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC) PS Did you crop Butters pup? Where is it? At Phils.
Ah. That explains it. Hafspajen ( talk) 11:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Any good? You can have them.
And you? Hafspajen ( talk) 23:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC) Not happy? these are very fine elephants, almost FP... Hafspajen ( talk) 19:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hear the news about the cave paintings in Sulawesi? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 00:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok. Crisco, somebody made a mistake on sheeps, it is mm not cm. Hafspajen ( talk) 00:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, Fram just pulled two hooks from Queue 5, but did not replace them—worse, he left the entries there with just an ellipsis, so there are effectively two blank lines. I'm way past my bedtime, so I'm going to hope that you log on before noon UTC, or that someone else finds and fixes the queue. Thanks if you see this and can fix it before it's too late. BlueMoonset ( talk) 07:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
If I scanned yesterday in 48-bit color, would that be the reason a file I've been trying to upload won't go through? Should the number be dialed down in photoshop? Thanks.-- Godot13 ( talk) 13:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
This is to inform you that Ruma Maida, which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Wikipedia Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 28 October 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:PORTRAIT OF CHARLES HODGE, Rembrandt Peale.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
12:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Hey Crisco, just wanted a second opinion on a nomination. I wanted to nominate either a single image or a set from a church during my trip to Lithuania. It was either going to be the 'lead interior image', or all four interior images as a set. I haven't had much luck with sets recently though, and I think they're probably a bit polarising for voters. People don't necessarily want to support all the images (particularly if there are some weaker images in the set) but can't justify an oppose vote either, so it ends up with less than the required 5 votes instead. So it seems that generally speaking, single images are more successful. But in the case of this subject, I feel all four images are pretty high quality and work fairly well as a set, so it's difficult to say any one is better or worse than another. However, the article just barely has enough content to support the images (took a bit of expansion and creative placements to make them fit) in the main body, and it's proven difficult to find more info in English on the church, so I could see an argument that four images is excessive. Your thoughts? Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:32, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco! I don't know if you remember me (I was Jagadhatri when I first met you) but I need a help (a big help) from you. Actually I'm working on Bade Achhe Lagte Hain so that it becomes a GA. And there are also some non-free media issues. Could you please help me?? Please don't say no! By the way I love (I literally love it) your page notice...aaha! It made my day..it touched my heart. Love you Crisco...thank you for making my day..I have similar quotes and pictures on my userpage. I love such images and quotes. Thank you for making my day! Love you Crisco! -- Tamravidhir ( talk!) 14:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Crisco, after some soul-searching I have replaced the lead image in Otto I. I am fairly sure, I can get used to the pillar :) (atleast the statue is neatly centered). If you have any additional ideas for tweaking, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks for your help with this image. GermanJoe ( talk) 22:19, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
What do you think of this? (If you want to make changes, please do them from the PNG) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 06:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, I posted to your talk page earlier in the week, hoping I could ask you to please check the appropriateness of the sourcing for the hook fact in this seven-article hook. Specifically, it's the list of names here of "Gator Greats"—just names and sport(s), with nothing indicating year of induction. Reviewer TonyTheTiger is awaiting a verdict from me on whether the source is reliable before continuing with the review, and I've never run into anything like this before, so I don't feel I can say yea or nay. (Is this kind of award often given not by the University, but by an external/alumni group? Does it matter who gives it?) Is this something you can handle, or should I try Nikkimaria? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
on the Japanese invasion currency (may have filled up Burma and Malaya, still nothing on Indonesia). Found guilder card money on St. Martin and a few other things that aren't in the standard reference books...-- Godot13 ( talk) 02:03, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
I think George Hamilton (South Australian police) might be in the picture - but who is the painter? Hafspajen ( talk) 14:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
A staple of diners and fast-food restaurants, cheeseburgers were first popularized in the United States during the 1920s and 30s, but they existed long before. |
.find File:1917 Modigliani Reclining nude anagoria.JPG - big and bad Hafspajen ( talk) 15:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Eh, maybe THIS or this. Hafspajen ( talk) 15:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Oedipus and the Sphinx 1864.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
02:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
|
P.S. I found the Japanese invasion money for the Netherlands Indies...-- Godot13 ( talk) 03:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
What great work at Japanese occupation of the Dutch East Indies. Thanks. Drmies ( talk) 03:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
Jack Crawford is now at FAC here. Any further comments more than welcome! Sarastro1 ( talk) 12:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, we're almost three hours past the time the next queue should have been promoted, and while there are two preps ready, the queues are empty. Can you please promote one? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 14:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco! I just wanted to ask that how many sets of DYK are selected for each day? Is it like this that set one will be featured on the main page from "so and so" time to "so and so" time and then set two and set three during another time period? I mean that how many sets are there? And who decides and how do they decide that when which one will show up? Could you please tell me? Tamravidhir ( talk!) 15:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Is your ping not working or something? Have you seen Black Sunday (1960 film)? Perhaps Giano has seen it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
We still have over nine hours before the next DYK promotion is scheduled, but there aren't any filled queues, though plenty of filled preps. If you have the time, it would be great to have a queue or two ready to go. Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:16, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, thanks for your previous help for me to promote the Chinese version of the article The Jakarta Post as a good article. This time I have to counter with another problem concerning the article Ouw Peh Tjoa. I have translate the article into Chinese, and now it is a candidate of good article in zhwp. A specialist in literature, history and philosophy has reviewed the article, and one of his comment is like that:
...the content is insubstantial and a expansion is needed; what is the difference between the film's plot and the original Chinese folklore? Who are the actors? Are they Chinese? How successful the film is (in terms of profit) (in Indonesia and Singapore)? How do the critics comment on it? What is the feature of its action scene? ...
Also, he stated that this two sentence is irrelevant to the topic:
... a year after Albert Balink's Pareh changed domestic perceptions of profitable film storylines. The's later films adapted stories closer to the native populace of the Indies and focussing on events that could happen in day-to-day life.[5] Through 1940 and 1941 Java Industrial Films was the most productive studio in the Indies, until it was shut down during the Japanese occupation which began in March 1942.[10]
... Biran writes that several Japanese propaganda films have survived at the Netherlands Government Information Service.[14]
I initially cited from the article that the cast is not recorded, but not sure that is it a concrete statement. Also, I promised him to seek advice from you, as you are an expert on Indonesian films. Could you please help for dealing these issues? Much thanks and sorry for inconvenience, -- Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 15:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco! Scallops in November? Can you make it so?? KDS4444 Talk 07:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco- When you have a chance, could you take a look at this. Probably my last nom for the Cup...-- Godot13 ( talk) 00:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Value | Art/progress proofs | Certified proofs | Portrait |
---|---|---|---|
1 peso |
José Martí | ||
Also, if we're focusing on the banknote, why not a hard crop? — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 01:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Isn't this a lovely copy? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 03:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
On 20 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pah Wongso, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the social worker Pah Wongso turned an extortion charge into a 25-cent fine and a school for impoverished youth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pah Wongso. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 14:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Maybe this? [2]... Looks like a good picture. Hafspajen ( talk) 17:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Crisco,
How will I be able to upload a file that big? Do you know the procedure? Étienne Dolet ( talk) 06:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
I have a bad cold. Is there any chance I could beg some help this week? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 18:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, we're again in a position where we have five preps filled (minus one quirky spot), but no queues. In about four hours, the bot will go looking for something to promote; if you're around before then and no one else has done any promoting, can you please take care of one? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Chris, you (and your talk page stalkers) may be interested in a thread I've started about Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests#Gough_Whitlam, where possibilities for marking the death (aged 98) of this former prime minister of Australia include re-running a TFA. I'm interested in getting lots of views so I'll be leaving this note on various pages (and apologies, TPS-ers, if your talk page is not one of them!) Thanks, Bencherlite Talk 08:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
This would be a good picture for the Doctors new article, but we don't have it.. http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.154233.html ?is it snachable? Hafspajen ( talk) 13:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Edits | ||
...now that’s a lot of edits... |
But don't worry, with this series of BEP proofs I've got your milestones covered through 500,000,000...-- Godot13 ( talk) 18:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, congratulations on 100,000 errors edits! ‑‑
Mandruss (
t)
20:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
``` Buster Seven Talk 17:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Lots and lots of photos, many of them really quite terribly reproduced. Feel like talking things through and figuring out what to keep and what to lose/put into a gallery? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 06:35, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
It is unfortunate if an image is deleted from the front page. I know images in POTDs are protected earlier; but no idea how images in FA are handled. Any suggestion for improvement? J e e 03:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
BTW, could you confirm whether there was an active DR notice on the top of the file page when you deleted it? Or there was no such notice after first DR was closed? It will help as to find whether it was a negligence from the TFA team at EN– isn't exactly friendly. Bencherlite Talk 09:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
[Edit conflict, leaving this in, but it's partially irrelevant now] If you mean my comment (not Jkadevor's) "I think TFA has started checking new images, but not things that were there when it passed FAC. But I don't think the TFA people know image copyright that well, they depend on others to some extent." - this was a particularly finicky copyright issue. I work with image copyright all the time, and it's a situation I hadn't seen; I was perfectly happy to have it proven in copyright, but I also knew the documentation hadn't yet proven the status claimed for it, and had a couple funny issues (1949 date given for an award that, while backdated to 1949, was only announced and awarded in 1950, for instance). Wikipedia depends, to some extent, on trust. Unfortunately, the trust in this case was being hinged on a long accumulation of precedent, with no firm proof it was wrong, but a lot of reasons to doubt if you dug into it a lot. Does anyone seriously think you should spend hours on every TFA checking copyright minutiæ? Now, TFA's checks aren't perfect - you may remember the mislicenced image a bit ago that (while out of copyright) used a US-only tag for a European work, or vice-versa? It came up because ERRORS dropped the ball on it a bit when I reported the minor issue. [It got deleted from ERRORS without the problem being fixed.] But I don't see how they could be perfect, given the constant, never-ending TFA cycle. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 09:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC) [Close edit conflict] I think that it was useful to find out where the checks that would have identified the problem should have been: Should Commons have been more careful about the DR notice, or should we see about getting TFA better checks for DRs on Commons? Or both? "Negligence", however, was a very poor choice of words. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 09:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:George Peter Alexander Healy - John C. Calhoun - Google Art Project.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
12:37, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Crisco, the Talk:ExactTarget/GA1 page had gotten stranded when the ExactTarget article and talk pages were moved to Salesforce Marketing Cloud the other day, so I've just moved the GA review page to the new article name as well. BlueMoonset ( talk) 21:30, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Ii want your help regarding Krimuk90 and I know he is far more experienced, intelligent, respected and supported here. But, his main problem is favouritism. He had revereted all my edits from the article, whom I am one of the main contributor. I want to challenge all his articles as all his articles show favouritism and I can't say more. Please help.— Prashant 14:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)K
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article September Morn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 18:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
After water, tea is the most widely consumed beverage in the world. It can be enjoyed hot or cold, with milk or sugar. Hafspajen ( talk) 17:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
Better? Hafspajen ( talk) 23:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Crisco, this nomination is stalled, and I was hoping you could get it moving again. Thanks for anything you can do. Also, if you'd like to take a look at Template:Did you know nominations/Assassination of Gabriel Narutowicz to see whether the neutrality issue I found in the original hook is also a problem in the article (I don't have faith that the original reviewer would have found it given the failure in the hook), that would be great. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
No snachin, she's Crisco's. Hafspajen ( talk) 07:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nymphe_surprise - article in French. Hafspajen ( talk) 07:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
If you were going to replace File:Theodore_Rooseveltnewtry.jpg, would you go with the identical (but higher-resolution and quality) http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.36054/ or the slightly different angle, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.36051/ ? Or would you go for a more radical departure, such as http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2013651052/resource/ or http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/92520593/resource/ ?
Since you have participated in at least one Requested Move or Move Review discussion, either as participant or closer, regarding the title of the article currently at Sarah Jane Brown, you are being notified that there is another discussion about that going on now, at Talk:Sarah Jane Brown#Requested move #10. We hope we can finally achieve consensus among all participating about which title best meets policy and guidelines, and is not too objectionable. -- В²C ☎ 17:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Think I've found one last, really good copy of a Luke Fildes work. As it's probably the best of the three, I think that, once it's been in the article a week, we should nominate? Unless you want to join me in trying to make an article for it? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 02:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
CU confirmed. Drmies ( talk) 23:28, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Should have known. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 02:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)