Welcome!
Hello, Cimmerian praetor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
strdst_grl
(call me Stardust)
12:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Jestli jště jednou přídáš letadla Antonov do výzbroje české armady, tak tě začnu nahlašovat.... Žadná letadla české armády to nebudou, nehledně na to že nebyl podepsán jediný dokument. Je to pouze spekulace nějaká spekulace, nikde v česku to nebylo oficialně potvrzeno. Stejně tak mi vysvětli proč dávaš pistole Phantom a pušky BREN do rezervy, když tam ještě nejsou? Neskutečně prasíš tu stránku podle obrazu svému + dáváš fake news a takhle to tady nefunguje... prober se ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I don't see why you're so obsessed with editing out any mentions in the "LGBT rights in the Czech Republic" article that the Czech Republic is a country in Central-Eastern (as opposed to just Central) Europe. They're both correct geographical designations. And I do think the liberalism vis-a-vis gay rights in the Czech Republic is particularly remarkable because it's unique among ex-Communist-bloc countries. It wouldn't be very surprising compared to Western Europe, would it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.215.252.239 ( talk) 23:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the Tatra articles and even more thanks for the photos you have uploaded in Commons!
Someone has questioned the licencing of [1], could you mark there the licence so that the photo will not be deleted. -- Gwafton ( talk) 14:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Tatra 77 drag coeficiet of 0.212 is definetely made on 1:5 model, Mackerle gives 0.24 for T87 1:5 model, when the real car was tested the figure was 0.36-7, T77 is very similar, this figure of 0.212 is a great misconception! --
Tatraplan ( talk
I assume Czech is your native language. Could you help me to understand the description at the bottom of this page: [2]
How to make the difference between T54, T52 and T30? I couldn't figure it out by using Google Translator. -- Gwafton ( talk) 20:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
21:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
I have modified this template so that it works, although it is still a little buggy, as I am not an expert on this kind of template. The problem was that infoboxes require the correct use of a meta-template, {{ Infobox}}, which you had not transcluded. If you need any more help with this, I suggest you try the help desk, where you will be able to find users more experienced with infobox templates. However, if you have any other problems, feel free to contact me at any time. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 16:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I modified the sandbox page for the template, and would like to know what do you think about it ( Template:Infobox tram/sandbox). I modified (style, some of the naming, order), added () and removed (facelift, comparable models) a few things. If you think this could be used from now on, I'll update all the pages and the documentation accordingly and move this over the old template. Also, I think there could be at least two more things added (borrowing from the Polish Wikipedia): spacing of bogies and spacing of the axles in bogies. What do you think? Soeb talk| contribs 17:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Ahoj. Hezký kus práce na článku o Universitě Palackého. Přemýšlel jsi o nominaci na T:TDYK? - Darwinek ( talk) 16:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I'll happily copy-edit that for you. I'd recommend you check my edits at the University article as you may disagree with the changes in some places. I only actually removed one bit of text, I think, which to me seemed irrelevant to a largly non-Czech audience. Si Trew ( talk) 13:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I presume you meant Josef Šnejdárek? (your link didn't work for me.) Yep, I'll do that some time today for you. Glad to see the other ones have had a bit more attention too, from yourself and others. Si Trew ( talk) 14:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
Infobox military person}}
and split the article into sections, which I admit are rather short so I can see why you didn't do so. Apart from that the changes were quite minor ("fortificated" -> "fortified", "fight" -> "battle", and a few changes in putting dates earlier in the sentence, I think that's about it).{{
Translated page}}
template on its talk page?I'm copy editing this for you now; can you please (in the opening para) explain the difference between a public university and a state one? In the UK the two are the same thing. Si Trew ( talk) 08:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Reviewing the other sections now. I don't really know that there's much to add. Si Trew ( talk) 07:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Si Trew ( talk) 07:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
etymology}}
template?!).{{
anchor}}
to help guard against future breaking changes).
Si Trew (
talk)
09:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)I've changed the section titles a bit; in particular I've changed "pre-education" to "before the university" or some such, so as not to suggest we are dealing with kindergartens or whatever.
Nothing major here. I note that you tend to write the thousands separator as a dot instead of a comma. Normally I would just replace them straight in the article, but in this article I've used the {{formatnum:}}
pseudo-template to do so, since I guessed it might be easier for you kinda to force yourself to use that for all numbers, instead of remembering which way round you had to write them. (Sadism eh?) Perhaps this also works better for those using text-to-speech readers and so on, I don't know.
Si Trew (
talk)
20:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
(Re WP:ENGVAR). Sure, just use Mid-Atlantic English!
I have a similar problem with working for a company that is split half-and-half between the UK and the US. We in the UK are supposed to write in US English, but we can't really do it: while we can alter our spelling (especially with the aid of a spelling checker), we don't tend to alter the grammar or use different words (for example I changed your "rooting" [for a team] to "supporting"; I doubt it would ever even occur to me to change "support" to "root"). Most articles don't suffer much trouble with this, one does get the occasional editor – often an anonymous IP editor who is just starting out and notices an "error" – who will change a perfectly good use. As I say, it becomes more problematic with articles that have vastly different vocabularies, and transportation seems to be one of them; on geography articles, for example, I've rarely had to worry about it, beyond making sure the spelling is consistent.
I have a bit of an interest in linguistics generally, and speak a couple of languages, but no Slavic or Germanic ones, only Latinate plus a bit of Japanese and Arabic. My partner is Hungarian, so I am learning that, but slowly because I haven't anyone else to practice with. It means that although I maybe don't know much if anything of the language (as is the case with Czech, for example), I tend to be able to make educated guesses about why something might have been written a particular way, i.e. what has got lost in translation.I notice, for example, you sometimes use "the" when it is not needed, or omit it when it is, which I imagine comes from how its use differs between Czech and English. It's for the same reason that while I could use Google Translate to translate most of those road signs, and of course most of them I would know the English for them anyway, I wanted a native speaker to look over them to make sure consistent terminology or for signs we don't have (snow chains, for example).
On the whole I think your writing is very clear, though, and although suitably formal is a pleasure to read. I don't understand the school of thought that thinks big words equals big thoughts, so it is a joy to read something that's understandable, and considering that we are trying to appeal to a very wide audience, I see no problem in using "easy" words, providing of course they cover the meaning.
I hope also you don't mind if I refer you to this or that template or policy, I hope that doesn't sound like preaching. I know from my own experience, learning Wikipedia is often hard because one kinda thinks "there must be a policy to help me decide this, or someone must have written a template to do this already, but I can't find it". Personally I find searching Wikipedia very difficult. But please feel free to ignore anything I say, I won't be offended! Si Trew ( talk) 11:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
You might be able to help with one thing: at Road signs in the Czech Republic, the definitions of the signs are in Czech and need translating. While of course most of them are obvious, there will no doubt be a few that I wouldn't be able to guess at accurately. Perhaps if I attempted to translate the ones I can (i.e. just substitute what we call them in the United Kingdom), you could check it over and fill in the rest? (This came to my attention via WP:PNT) Si Trew ( talk) 08:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks with the road signs. I am trying to use the words used by the British Highway Code so I will look at those two and see what I make of it. I am sure that will not suit everyone (our American audience especially) but we can't really have both American and British English words for everything so I've taken the view one standard is better than none.
I've left the direction signs to last as the most wordy and also that I am not sure how best to translate each kind of road: Motorway, highway, and so on.
There are still a few untranslated in the other sections (marked with {{lang|cs}}
) just when I was not sure the best translation. To my surprise, Google Translate seemed to give quite a good translation most of the time.
Si Trew (
talk)
11:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks very much. I'll do any tidying from the English side, please take no offence! Nice work! Si Trew ( talk) 12:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
I wonder if the article Subsidiarity is anywhere close to what you want with self-governance. This word got the British media rather raising its eyebrows when John Major used it to describe how he wished to see the UK Parliament in relation to the European Union – I think most suspected the word was made up by eurocrats.
I do remember vaguely changing the quango article or link or something, I can't remember which way round now. I think at the time that article did more accurately cover simply non-governmental organisations, but it may have changed somewhat now and need moving again to a better title ("Self-governing body" or some such). Si Trew ( talk) 12:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm subbing Josef Šnejdárek. Is Czech: rotmistr by any chance Sergeant major? Si Trew ( talk) 14:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Czech: zástupce velitele roty: Second lieutenant? Si Trew ( talk) 14:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I've copy-edited Legal clinic as you asked. Nothing major, just the usual bits of rewording and I added a few links in. Please of course do revert/change if I have mistakenly changed any meaning.
Best wishes Si Trew ( talk) 02:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
Infobox tram}}
. As you may know, I've recently got
Old Rouen tramway to GA and have been fiddling with
Montmartre funicular amongst other things. I suggest you might have a look at those to see whether comments about what should and should not be included are valid. I didn't use {{Infobox tram}}
because I didn't think it was suitable: that may be a valid decision, or maybe indicate that it needs a few more fields or fewer. In particular, I think it should be clearer whether a tram refers to the whole network (as for
Old Rouen tramway), a particular line, or a particular model of tram no matter what line it is used on. I'd appreciate your views.
Si Trew (
talk)
18:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Ahoj. Velmi rád. Zde posílám odkaz. - Darwinek ( talk) 09:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Have you noticed that there are marked requests for sources on the old NW/Tatra photos you have uploaded in Commons? Would you fill the needed information so that they will not be deleted. I have used the same photos on the Finnish NW/Tatra articles as well and wouldn't be happy if someone deleted them.
Another matter. I found this article about T77 (in Polish). It says that the first serial produced streamliner car was Rumpler Tropfenwagen, not T77. To me it looks like the writer knows what he is talking about. Does the other information match with the sources you have used?
Moreover, the source claims that Hans Ledwinka was not the one who brought streamlining to Tatra, but it was Erich Übelacker. Übelacker joined in Tatra in 1927 and when he tried to convince Ledwinka about the benefits of the design, he had doubts about it, but told about the idea to the company board. As you know, then they started a new project called V570. Based on the experience about the second prototype, Ledwinka got convinced about the benefits of the design.
However, the story gets more interesting the deeper you go into it. This source says that the Austrian automotive pioneer Béla Barényi created a concept of a stremalined people's car with a central load carrying tube and air cooled boxer engine with a rear engine layout between 1925-1931. He went to show it to several companies including Tatra, Steyr and Porsche's newly opened engineering company. But due to the recession of early 1930's, the companies were not interested in such revolutionary ideas but put all their efforts on survival.
I read somewhere (don't remember where) that Barényi wrote about his ideas on Motor-Kritik magazine, where the main director was Josef Ganz. He made later a concept car Standard Superior. It is unclear to me, if Ganz got his ideas from Barényi or Barényi from Ganz. There are some websites in the net which claim that the honour about VW Beetle belongs to Ganz. But still I don't think the truth is that simple. I should also search for Edmund Rumpler's role in the development.
I hope these links are useful to you if you still want to improve the articles. Could you please tell me if you happen to find interesting and believable sources about the matter. -- Gwafton ( talk) 13:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Ahoj, as I know, that you are interested in modern history. There is article German occupation of Czechoslovakia, but this article looks not so good and can be improved. Can you help me? Děkuji-- Yopie ( talk) 01:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Cimmerian, sorry I have been extremely busy lately as we have just moved house a few weeks ago and have been fixing up the decor and so on. I did not expect to be moved so quickly otherwise I would have said. I will try to get around to y our requests, but please my apologies for my neglect and a very happy christmas to you if I don't catch you before.
Si Trew ( talk) 00:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
I do not know if this question is for you or for the talk page of the university entry. But the sources are in Czech so it's not one I can answer. (Also the sources are books and I do not have them.)
According to the entry on Vilém Prusinovský z Víckova "a year after his death, in 1573, his plan of promotion of the Olomouc school to Jesuit Academy was realized"
The implication of the earlier statement is that the institution was passed over to the Jesuits in 1566. Does that mean the Jesuits got it in 1566, but it only became a Jesuit academy in 1573. (In my limited understanding, the Jesuits would surely not have waited seven years...) Or does it mean that one of those dates is incorrect?
Sorry it's not more obvious to me. But it's not...
Best wishes
Charles01 ( talk) 20:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
It's not clear to the reader (at least to this reader) whether we are discussing Olomouc or the whole empire. (I didn't fancy struggling to master the source, I'm afraid!) If it's across the entire empire, then that would become clear by writing (for instance) "In 1752 the Office of Faculty Directors was established in Vienna (or Prague?)" If we're just discussing Olomouc, then of course "....at Olomouc" would do the job. Any views?
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 21:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
I do not understand if this means that a medical school was set up (separately) in Olomouc. If it wasn't, I'm not necessarily sure why this sentence belongs in the entry at all. Also, if it became a separate field around 1782, that begs the question of how was it taught before? Part of the Law or Theology syllabus? I hope not, but I am pretty ignorant on the history of medicine.
Anyway, a source is shown. If you have access to that source, maybe it is clearer to you?
I'm rather enjoying this: I hope I will not be "treading on toes". I am maybe making more changes than I had intended. Now I must go to my (English) dictionary to find out how we are meant to spell obst... obstetricians. Regards Charles01 ( talk) 17:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
This is a very picky point, but if they close the Theology Faculty repeatedly in a single year, then it must reopen almost as frequently. The comment begs more questions than (for me) it answers. If the communists did not like people learning about theology, why did they not close the faculty permanently? Or was it more a question of a succession of government sponsored raids, in which case why only during 1950? I think I would expect the same behaviour to continue for several years, "during the early 1950s". The understanding here is that things remained particularly repressive in Czechoslovakia at least until 1953 when Gottwald and Stalin died. But of course I know nothing about what was actually happening. Any insights? Charles01 ( talk) 15:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I've finally got round to copy editing this. There were not too many fa ults in English grammar, but I have changed a few piped links i.e. what the wording of the pipe is because what no doubt is common knowledge in the Czech Republic is not so in the UK (and vice versa of course); but please feel free to revert any or all of it, and no doubt I have probably introduced slips myself even though I have tried to check carefully; sometimes one can't see the meat for the potatoes.
I am sorry this has taken me so long to get around to, the missus and I have been very busy decorating our new home. My sincere best wishes. Prost! Si Trew ( talk) 07:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, read the WP:MOSFLAG or million of threads (old discussions) in the WP:CARS rgds --> Typ932 T· C 03:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
I would suggest, in a friendly way, that contributions on law faculties should be careful about using the word "Juristic" too much. The problem is that Jurist means very different things in the anglo-american tradition from what it means in the continental European tradition. I think the wikipedia entry on Jurist explains it quite well. A law expert in any country will be aware of the challenge and understand the word well enough, but there will be other readers who think they know what you mean - so they won't bother to look it up in the dictionary - but who may infer a meaning that the writer did not intend.
Just sharing the thought while I had it. Hope you don't mind. I have to switch tasks, now, and print my son's homework. I seem to be in possession of the household's only working printer. Eat your heart out, HP.
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 20:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
My eye is caught by this phrase. In 1570, surely most books were in Latin or maybe Greek. But it was generous, because either the books were mostly pretty new because newly printed or else they were hand copied. Either way they would have been horribly expensive. I wonder if there is a source that comments on the language of the books or ... what. Anyhow, it seems that when the Swedes did what they did two generations later, the library would have represented a great treasure store. Hmmm. Regards Charles01 ( talk) 15:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I think this means that the library obtained and retained a copy of every book, journal, (?newspaper), (?pamphlet) printed in Moravia between 1860 and 1946. (And from areas of Silesia during the Austro-Hungarian emp[ire period). Is that your understanding? I'm only about 90% confident that I've understood this correctly.
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 18:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I just finished with libraries section. I may come back to it if I notice anything I got very wrong, but my intention is to leave he University entry alone, at least for a bit.
There was a reference to the Eurocentre in the library section. I can guess what that is, but I don't know if I'd guess right. It maybe needs a sentence of explanation in the library section or even, if there is anything interesting to be written about it, a little section of its own. Or maybe it is very dull and the reference to it should be removed? Either way, I tried clicking on the source page indicated, but wasn't smart enough to find Eurocentre on it....
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 19:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
It's interesting going through this one in a bit of detail. It was actually reported, if only briefly, in England, possibly because it plays to some of the preconceptions the English media have about "Abroad", and / or possibly because it was a shocking and eye-catching event. Also, they always like to report anything with Hitler in the title, because the 1939-45 war (our dates for it) is one period in history where the English come out pretty unambiguously as the good guys (though I appreciate that from the heart of Joe Stalin's middle European empire that may not have looked quite as obvious as it did from London).
Actually, as far as I remember, the reporting on the BBC of the Vitkov attrocity was pretty much in line with the Czech reports. Maybe that's where they copied it from. Twenty years ago the BBC used to send correspondents to find out what was going on and report on it, but these days they increasingly depend on feeds from other agencies (at best) and otherwise devote large chunks of the news reports to pumping out half digested rehashes of press releases issued on behalf of "clients" (mostly politicians and celebrities) by "public relations professionals". But I think the BBC news reports probably still contain a higher proportion of truth than many of the English newspapers. Today there is a story all over the news about a politician's wife being photographed dressed in a sheet. That's the story. There's another one about Malawi (hang on while we find it on the map) where someone has allegedly suggested that farting in public should be made illegal. Sorry ... you didn't ask for this. But (to revert to my intended scope with this request) it would help the entry to become more complete if we were able to fill in a bit more on these appeals in the Vitkov case.
Best wishes 20:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
This reads to me as though no political party has ever, at any time, been banned in the Czech republic, except for this one.
That may be strictly speaking correct, but I would imagine that under the communists, many parties (the ones not communist) were banned in Czechoslovakia. English-language readers may not be instantly aware that the Czech republic is a new country.
I'm assuming a lot here. If I'm wrong, please tell me. But if I'm right, how about
"....which, in 2011, remains the only political party to have been banned since the creation of the Czech republic in 1993"
?
Many thanks if you have any insights to share on this. Best wishes Charles01 ( talk) 12:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
They were between them also ordered to pay damages in excess of 17 million Does this mean, that each one of them is fully responsible for the whole sum? I mean, if one of them wins a lottery of 17M, he has to pay it all, and then he can try to collect the shares from the other ones. I was not able to translate that and I am not sure if I understand it from this wording. Thank you for answer. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 12:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Best wishes Charles01 ( talk) 13:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Having mentioned that he married Marie Anna in Vienna, I can't help thinking we ought to say something about her. Eg ...was she the daughter of a Viennese lawyer called (zum Beispiel) Johann Mueller. Would she (sorry if it's there and I didn't get to it yet) be the mother of his five children? Irgendwas waere notwendig, meine Meinuing nach. Or?
Out of interest, does the fact that he married at all imply protestant tendencies despite re-Catholicization of Moravia since 1620? I wonder how that would have gone down with the folks in Vienna. In the medieval period (at least in England: as you see, I known nothing about that period in the Czech lands) university scholars were all priests and therefore officially celibate.
Charles01 ( talk) 21:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
proposing some changes: "Monse was key to the establishment of the academic history tradition in Moravia." Maybe the word historiography would be better? Or does simply "history" mean also "history science" in English? a determined reflection of his "motto": "Return the Old Glory to the Homeland!" -> that is my own translation, if there would be a better way to put it, please do so.
Hello! Your submission of
Bohdan Pomahač at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Snek01 (
talk)
22:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bohdan Pomahač, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that doctor Bohdan Pomahač performed the first full face transplant in the United States? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
(btw, I like the user name).
Any source that bank account in swiss bank was under Klaus' name? section corruption scandals. I only found sources it was ods account. otherwise Ill put it back 88.101.175.204 ( talk) 16:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Czech is the only official language of the Czech Republic, and it is spoken by about 96% of the population. SOURCE. Czech.cz is a site of MZV!
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
CIreland (
talk)
15:43, 3 May 2011 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Cimmerian praetor ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please review the reasons for my block. I brought it forward to the notice board, as the other user was just deleting what he didn't like at the Czech Republic wikipage. I tried to resolve it with him at the talk page, to no avail. I understand that I breached the 3RR. I just saw no other way to prevent the deleting attack. I did it in good faith, please instruct me how to prevent deleting of essential info without being blocked in future. Thank you.
Decline reason:
"Essential info" is in the eyes of WP:CONSENSUS. If someone else is edit-warring, you can take them to WP:AN/3RR. If you want the page protected, go to WP:RFPP. Otherwise, use WP:DR ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello! Your submission of
Lumír Ondřej Hanuš at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
![]() | On 14 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lumír Ondřej Hanuš, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that leading cannabinoid neurotransmitters researcher Lumír Ondřej Hanuš was growing cannabis on two large fields in Olomouc in the 1970s for medical purposes? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't feel 100% confident that all is well. Did I make the move you requested? Should there be an existing talk page somewhere?-- SPhilbrick T 12:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
The nomination was speedy failed. You may use the suggestions in improving the article. Moray An Par ( talk) 15:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Drop me an email and I'll send you the list along so that you can look for yourself. There are also listed "other important centres of higher learning" such as "Brno: (German) Polytechnic 1849". As for true universities my list is exhaustive, that is at least as my reference is concerned. I did not leave out a single entry. Regards Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 11:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Johann Karl Nestler, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Johann Karl Nestler was teaching scientific animal and plant breeding at the University of Olomouc in what is now the Czech Republic at the time when Gregor Mendel studied there? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cimmerian praetor. As for this edit summary, please don't forget that the article in Reflex was a prank, not a serious claim. Btw, I don't think this incident deserves a stand alone article, however that's a topic of another discussion. -- Vejvančický ( talk | contribs) 11:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Cimmerian praetor, your explanation is not valid according to the rules of Wikipedia. You can´t make a bad article better through inserting pranks like this one about "cleptomania". You yourself admitted that it was only a prank, so in fact a vulgar lie and nothing else. Not even on the wiki:cz (which is of bad quality in respect to reporting about Mr. Klaus) this lie has been published in any way. I strongly disagree with you and your "tactics". Maybe you are of the same origin like myself, but I am sure to know much more about international politics and implications of such published "pranks" than you. The alleged incident in Chile, invented in this intensity by the Czech public television (really and very badly so), is possibly not to be directly connected with Mr. Havel, but certainly with some of his misled supporters. By the way, in our present times with all current political and economic problems, not many people outside the Czech Republic really remember Mr. Havel as a person of present-day interest and a significant political figure. And he was never an economist, or if having been a politician he sometimes was involved in economic matters, so he was a very bad economist, contrary to President Klaus. So please stop inserting this unbelievable prank into the article concerned, which certainly will be deleted as a whole in the near future, as it is completely irrelevant and totally incomprehensible with the rules of Wikipedia and conduct between civilized nations. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 10:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Oh dear, the Czech television has definitely manipulated the sequences shown. I don´t know how to explain to you that you are simply wrong. It would be much better to delete the whole article about alleged Chilean incident or to write there something in a decent way, and not to add further pranks to it, especially in a way which can be totally misinterpreted. You personally probably don´t like Mr. Klaus, but this is no reason to make him worse than he is. We are no children anymore, neither you nor me, because we are sitting at Wikipedia on Monday noon. Please stop telling people that "Klaus took the pen in a very dishonest way". Again, neither you nor me can undo the damage done to the international reputation of the Czech Republic by the dishonest reporting of the Czech TV from Chile. It is simply a mess, and only really clever tactics could solve the problem. I must fear that you will be no companion in this effort. But at least, please think of the further development in our native country. There should be a good successor in 2013 to Mr. Klaus, who on the whole has been a good president up to now. Who has predicted (yes, he has in a certain sense a good qualification for predicting) the current euro crisis already at least 10 years ago? It was Mr. Klaus, and he did much more for the well-being of the country and of a majority of its inhabitants. There are, of course, many different aspects for a final judgment on him, as things are getting more and more complicated. Further discussion of this topic might be too much for this column, but be sure that there is already a fight behind the scenes for the succession. For today, just one reply please, and no more. And I should also stop this up to now fruitless discussion with you for the rest of this day, because there are some other tasks for me. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 11:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Cimmerian praetor, you can´t exactly know either, if Klaus´ entourage did or did not claim, whether the sequence was changed or not. The point is that everything about this issue has been extremely exaggerated by personal enemies of Klaus, if you believe it or not. We should be a little bit more diplomatic in our information policy. I don´t agree that diplomacy means to exaggerate rude exaggerations by citations about alleged kleptomania or things like this. Sometimes there are other means, my friend in exile, and so in fact I can´t help you. Besides this, you are not quite well informed about the standings of Klaus abroad and how positively he is perceived among Czech compatriots e.g. in the USA and Australia. He is without any doubt a firm friend of NATO, the US and of free enterprise and trade. If you prefer Havel´s dreams of a nebulous third way between "capitalism" and communism, so there are of course no limits to you to express your opinion, but please let Klaus´ privacy untouched. Up to now you did exactly the contrary. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 10:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
My dear friend Cimmerian praetor, of course I remain polite, as I am used to it. You are the same, so we can discuss openly and freely. I am very sorry not to have enough time now to explain to you my political standings and opinions at least briefly. There are much more complicated than you probably think. Later on, if ever. What you forget in my eyes all the time is that Klaus has been a dominating figure in "Czechia" for the last 22 years. Yes, he was this figure up to very recent days, more than Havel. And now he is beseiged by his foes. There will be a successor in 2013, and I hope he (or she???) won´t come from that part of the Czech political spectrum which really doesn´t have any idea about economic matters. I am very sorry to say that unfortunately President Havel had never any suitable idea about economic matters. Klaus is appreciated by the Friedrich-von Hayek-Society in Germany. They are possibly better witnesses than your friends in Switzerland. Have a nice day -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 11:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the update. I've seen the deletion. I don't agree with it, but I will respect the majority consensus. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 12:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Actually I thought, that this debate was already closed. As far as I remember, there was no tag anymore. My bad.
Dishwashing great. Klaus greater. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 13:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to ask you what do you consider to be an accurate English equivalent of Czech terms "městská část" and "městský obvod"? Because I really don't know, in my opinion term "city district" is bit confusing because we already have Brno-City District, Ostrava-City District and Plzeň-City District which are something significantly different. -- Millenium187 ( talk) 15:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I reverted your backed only by your OR summary. czech Republic is considered as an Eastern European country by UN, just like Slovakia. Please note that Wikipedia is not a place for biased arguments but instead reliable sources are accepted only. ItsAlwaysLupus ( talk) 17:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
In my opinion, it is geographically not correct to say Czech Republic would be an Eastern European country. Prague is located much more to the West then Vienna. Czech Republic is located between Germany and Austria, etc. For some statistical purposes, European Statistical Office in Luxembourg counts the Czech Republic to Western Europe, whereas Slovakia belongs there to Eastern Europe. This might be more or less artificial, but Central Europe is definitely correct. Czech Republic, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and Austria are certainly located in the middle of the continent. They do not possess any maritime coast. Slovakia and Hungary can be also counted to this category, but with somewhat lesser justification to Central Europe. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 15:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Tatra 77 coeficient is given 0.212 (Not for T77a) - the actual source I cannot find, can you let me know in which book this is stated as a fact. I give the comparison with T87 as an example, which for the 1:5 model was 0.24 as given by Mackerle. Real car is 0.36. Ir is logical that similar reading was for T77 which is very similar. It is nonsense to quote the figure of 0.212 for the real car, they did not test full size cars in tunnels before SWW... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatraplan ( talk • contribs) 09:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes but does Janiga claim the figure is for a real car?? Surely you see the logic if T87 is 0.24 for 1:5 model and real car 0.36, it is impossible for T77a to have such a large difference in the reading for a real car! This misinformation has been on the internet and in some misinformed publications and it needs to be put right (we are hoping to arrange a tunnel test soon to put this to bed for good) in the meantime the figure 0.212 should be used with great caution and not given as a fact just because Janiga used it, Mackerle is much better informed source on this subject matter and this should be stated in the T77 article... ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC).
We are looking for a sponsor for the tunnel testing, will let you know when that happens. Tatra only tested models. Kieselbach in 'Stromlinienautos in Europa und USA' book (1982) also clearly states for T87 1:5 model in 1941 0.244, real car tested in VW tunnel in 1979 0.36, he does not give any figures (quite rightly for T77 or T77a) see page 19. I am still looking where the figure of 0.212 originally came from and it must have been long before Janiga who must be simply repeating it without questioning it, is there a source where he is quoting from? Where did he get it from if you give him such confidence? There is nothing in Rosencranz as far as I know, as I say caution is necessary if Janiga cannot give a proper source... ( Tatraplan ( talk) 11:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC) )
Exactly my point, how can you put that information as a given fact in the wiki? That is not a properly sourced scientific fact if Janiga cannot confirm it - hence I ask you please to qualify this in the text of the T77 article as this has done enough damage already. Thanks for understanding. Tatraplan ( talk) 12:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I didn't say that he canno qualify it. I don't have the book on me. The fact is that it is a specialist in the field who claims this figure. What is the basis of his claim, I don't know. But in line with WP:Original research we cannot just say, that it is unprobable, unless there are sources for such a claim. All you provide are sources for T 87 Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 13:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
If a specialist/academic gives a figure it has to have a scientific back up and be properly sourced as is required by the wiki, if it is not sourced, it is worthless and cannot be quoted. I provide the T87 figures for comparison only and because they are the only ones available which are properly quoted and sourced, none such figures exist for T77. Hence the figure 0.212 cannot be taken as a fact... Tatraplan ( talk) 13:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Last night I have been in touch with a colleague Tatra researcher and writer, he confirmed that years ago he copied the drag coefficient figures from the Tatra archives and all the figures up to T87 were given for 1:5 models only. I have asked him to obtain a copy of these documents (this may take some time) and will let you know once I have them. This mess needs to be put right as soon as possible. Tatraplan ( talk) 10:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Will do, but SURELY Tatra Works archive documents are the best and most reliable info, from 'the lion's den', than for example Janiga's who probably picked the information from many unreliable, un-sourced or unsupported internet sites??? Tatraplan ( talk) 08:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
What is the reason? Archive data is published in the archive. By coping it into a book (and sometimes badly) it only gets distorted as the case above indicates - does not make sense, when someone submits a PhD which is original research is that all bunk according to Wiki? Tatraplan ( talk) 13:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, understand but still bit of a grey area here, any book published data should always have a source, citation, otherwise there is no proof that they are an invention by the writer, so it works really both ways, not everything published in books or articles is 'God' given, that is the problem... Tatraplan ( talk) 08:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, what do you mean unnecessary?? its facts that formed our country, if my language is poor why dont you correct it instead of deleting everything? thanks for reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jirka.h23 ( talk • contribs) 12:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks I have made a clarification
During April and May 1945 an estimated 1.6 million Germans from Polish Silesia fled the advancing Soviet forces and became refugees in Bohemia-Moravia. Thus according to German estimates there were 4.5 million German civilians present in Bohemia-Moravia in May 1945. [http://z-g-v.de/doku/archiv/frameset04_1.htm Die Vertreibung der deutschen Bevölkerung aus der Tschechoslowakei Band 1 (in German) Page 18 -- Woogie10w ( talk) 18:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
This is the German text
Zu den etwa 100 000 unterzubringenden Slowakeideutschen kamen annähernd 1,6 Millionen Reichsdeutsche, fast ausschließlich aus den schlesischen Provinzen, deren Fluchtweg in die Sudetenländer führte7. Da seit Ende März/Anfang April auch das Ostsudetenland und Mähren Kampfgebiet wurden, ballte sich zur Zeit der Kapitulation die Masse der Flüchtlinge auf dem Weg nach Westen auf böhmischem Gebiet zusammen. Nur einem kleinen Teil war es damals schon gelungen, Bayern zu erreichen oder ins westliche Sachsen auszuweichen; etwa eine Million
18 erlebte den deutschen Zusammenbruch mit seinen bitteren Begleiterscheinungen im Sudetenland und Protektorat. Die zu diesem Zeitpunkt in Böhmen und Mähren-Schlesien anwesenden deutschen Zivilpersonen lassen sich mit mindestens 4,5 Millionen beziffern.
-- Woogie10w ( talk) 18:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Dobrý den,jsem toho názoru, že Česká republika vznikla v roce 1969, například Československo, vzniklo v roce 1918, ale VZNIKLO, né se osamostanilo, jelikož předtím žádné nebylo, tedy i Česká (byť socialistická) republika vznikla 1.1.1969, předtím žádná neexistovala, byl zde unitární stát, já chápu, že může mít někdo k tomu výhrady z hlediska systému a událostí té doby, ale přeci proto nebudeme přepisovat dějiny. Poté byl pouze změněn název a přijata státní vlajka a státní znak. Po zániku ČSFR se tato existující republika osamostatnila. Zpochybňovat kontinuitu dnešní republiky s ČSR, by bylo trochu divné, copak někdo zpochybňoval kontinuitu Československa v roce 1991 ? Kolikrát tu byl změněn název ? ...Republika Československá, Česko-Slovenská republika, Československá republika, Československá socialistická republika, Československá federativní republika, Česká a Slovenská Federativní Republika, nemluvě o státním zřízení...ne, bylo to stále jedno Československo... Takže tedy i dnešní Česká republika má své počátky. Základy našeho státu, byly položeny v roce 1969, přesně tak, jak uvádí česká verze o ČR. Mělo by zde být uvedeno: vznik 1.1.1969 (v rámci federace), změna názvu 6.3.1990, 1.1.1993 (plná samostatnost).
Dobrý den, provedl jsem změny na stránce 'Doktor práv'. Právo udělovat tento titul má stále Fakulta právnická Západočeské univerzity. Fakulta právnická ZČU je oprávněna uskutečňovat studium v doktorském studijním programu "Teoretické právní vědě", v oborech:
Občanské právo (s akreditací do 5. května 2013), Obchodní právo (s akreditací do 30. dubna 2013), Trestní právo (s akreditací do 5. května 2013).
http://fpr.zcu.cz/study/doktorske_studium/
S pozdravem 147.228.209.182 ( talk) 08:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Rovněž jsem na stránce 'Právnická fakulta' opravil nepravdivé tvrzení o Fakultě právnické ZČU, neboť tato fakulta má magisterský studijní obor akreditována až do 31. 7. 2016 a na fakultě tento obor dosud studuje na 1500 studentů. Rovněž Ministerstvo školství dosud nevydalo žádné rozhodnutí, aby plzeňská právnická fakulta letos nepřijímala nové studenty.
S pozdravem 147.228.209.182 ( talk) 08:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
The details you mention are definitely relevant, just not in the LEAD. The LEAD summarizes the topic of the article, and the topic of the article is the 15 T. The text in question is certainly valid, but should be moved to a section on the development process. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 00:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
The reference you used was outdated and frankly questionable. It has since come out that he has not been charged with anything. Please refrain from adding unreliable information to wikipedia. -- Williamsburgland ( talk) 22:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Directly from your article:
Podle jednoho z účastníků tehdejšího koncertu došlo k napadení fanouška poté, co vylezl mezi skladbami na pódium. "Byl vržen po zádech směrem do davu, letěl obloukem a dopadl pozadu přímo na hlavu," popsal svědek pro Aktuálně.cz.
Does it not say that Blythe was attacked?-- Williamsburgland ( talk) 22:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Pankrác Prison at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
09:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've looked at the article and while it's very interesting it's not a 5x expansion [3]. It needs a bit more. I know it's difficult to expand already-sizeable articles five times but that's the DYK rules. VolunteerMarek 16:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
How do you define the area of liberated Poland? Should you also count in the Polish area east from Curzon line which Soviet Union liberated for themselves? How about the German territory which was only later annexed to Poland? I think it is impossible to give an objective figure. -- Gwafton ( talk) 08:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Chamberlain's quote at the top of the article is a good addition. Pelarmian ( talk) 12:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Freedom of speech by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Institute of technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collegium Nobilium ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 26 January 2013, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Czech presidential election, 2013, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Jayron 32 17:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kunovice ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Dear Cimmerian praetor, you know the stage quite well. I just deleted something which was not necessary, not really enriching the article - which is quite problematic anyway. What is the impact of some "world records" to the situation in the Czech Republic after the amnesty? And be sure, any moves against Klaus in this case will be juridically turned down. He had a constitutional right to release an amnesty. So petitions are really only typical Czech activism. There is too much of it, since 1990. The situation is not good, and will not get better. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 10:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Randy Blythe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encore ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Dear Cimmerian praetor,
It's not the lack of sourcing that is the problem with the sentence in "Bail". It's that the sentence (i) is nothing to do with England and Wales, (ii) appears to have nothing to do with bail at all (are you thinking it's something to do with the etymology?) (iii) is as far as I can see quite wrong (the authoritative Latin dictionary by Lewis and Short mentions bajulus meaning a porter, a day-labourer, a bearer at a funeral and a letter-carrier, with no meaning in a legal context at all; A H M Jones' magisterial History of the Later Roman Empire, very strong on administrative history, does not mention the term). I really don't think it should stay.
Deipnosophista
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Škoda Popular, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cc ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
16:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Looking at this, I think you're pretty well okay. Just a few points. One, was the backbone chassis used for the entire Škoda size range? If so, I'd add that (rather than the displacements, which seem more apt for the individual pages). Two, what was the source of the issue over lack of tortional stiffness? What model/model range/year? I'd add it. "Škoda's second highest type" Is that in price or size? Both? (My understanding is, bigger meant costlier at that time, but I'm not completely sure.) Clarifying would be helpful. "similar to its contemporary pricing policy" Contemporary to what? Then, or now? Strictly speaking, contemporary would be at that time, so this is a bit unclear. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 27 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a shortage of firearms caused the World War II 1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka to have to turn away new recruits? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 08:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vietnamese ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Cimmerian praetor, I'm contacting you because we need some Czech translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on cs.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Czech Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
please let me know what you need translated and I will be glad to help. As regards the message, I should be able to get to that during the weekend, as regards the Editor, I will see what I can do. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 05:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Názvy zrušených dekretú jsem zkopíroval přímo ze Sbírky zákonů, každý si může správnost ověřit, ve sbírce je pochopitelně uvedeno zda zákon platí nebo ne, vytvoření takového seznamu je čistě mechanická záležitost. Výjimkou je 245/1946 Sb. u kterého je vyznačeno, že není platný, ale není uvedeno datum ukončení platnosti. PB0305 ( talk) 09:56, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
{ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Gregor_Mendel&diff=566955504&oldid=566936911 that's what the book says]. Have you read it? 512bits ( talk) 11:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm Brambleberry of RiverClan, GOCE copyeditor for this article. When I added the clarification tag, that was because I didn't understand what "taking a third one" meant. ö Brambleberry of RiverClan 15:12, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
| Hello, Cimmerian praetor. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Randy Blythe manslaughter case at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! ö Brambleberry of RiverClan 23:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Harok family murder. Since you contributed to the Harok family murder article, [4] I though that I would let you know about the BLPN discussion. Your efforts to develop the article are good, but I think there may be room for revision. -- Jreferee ( talk) 05:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 02:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Randy Blythe manslaughter case you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
North8000 --
North8000 (
talk)
03:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
Randy Blythe manslaughter case you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Randy Blythe manslaughter case for comments about the article. Well done!
Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 ( talk) 02:17, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
You might have an opinion on this: Talk:Ford Taunus P1
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 09:17, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
The first time I read this I thought it was telling me that gun/weapon production accounts for a higher proportion of the manufacturing sector in Czechia than it does of the manufacturing sector in any other EU country. I was about to resequence the sentence accordingly. But then I looked more closely. I'm not sure it tells us anything - except by way of innuendo - about the relative weighting/importance of gun making / weapon making within the Czech manufacturing sector. I understand that gun manufacturing is or may be more important to the Czech economy than to other EU economies. And that might be true. But I don't think that is what the source says. And unless a source can be found that DOES say that, I'm not sure this point belongs here. Though yes, it COULD be a powerful point if (1) true and (2) sourced.
Or is the point simply that manufacturing is very important to the Czech economy? In which case, yes indeed. But is that sufficiently relevant to Gun politics to belong in the introduction/summary here?
Or am I being tiresomely picky? Charles01 ( talk) 09:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Here it is. Hopefully we can reach an agreement. -- RevivesDarks ( talk) 15:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gun politics in the Czech Republic you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tezero --
Tezero (
talk)
02:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The article
Gun politics in the Czech Republic you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Gun politics in the Czech Republic for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tezero --
Tezero (
talk)
00:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The article
Gun politics in the Czech Republic you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Gun politics in the Czech Republic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tezero --
Tezero (
talk)
20:04, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Overview of gun laws by nation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FMJ. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 4 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gun politics in the Czech Republic, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that firearms laws in the Czech Republic allow people to carry concealed firearms for self defense? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gun politics in the Czech Republic. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Overview of gun laws by nation may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Overview of gun laws by nation may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on the Uherský Brod shooting. I have nominated it as an In the News item, crediting you as its best contributor. You can go there to add to the debate about whether it should be on the front page under In the News. '''tAD''' ( talk) 02:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Velika Ivanča shooting — when I first heard of the Uhersky shooting I was reminded of this and I used it as justification for the In The News nomination. There are some similarities, as it was the worst in the country's peacetime history. According to the article, this Serbian shooter was not known to be mentally ill (despite a family history) so I'm not sure if it's as justified as a see also. '''tAD''' ( talk) 15:54, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to the above-referenced article. However, I was forced to remove sections of text in violation of speculation and synthesis. Yours, Quis separabit? 12:10, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation, but I can not take part as I have limited proficiency and expertise in the subject matter. I believe that a good and fair judgement can be reached without my involvement. Thank you '''tAD''' ( talk) 21:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Template:Infobox tram has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
20:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Legal clinic, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Clinical Legal Education-Third Wave from Clinical Law review Vol 7:1, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Legal clinic saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 203.45.10.187 ( talk) 23:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. After closing out the listing for Legal clinic, I glanced quickly at a few of your other contributions and found another edit that concerns me, at Academic degree, with content copied directly from [5]. This article is now blanked and listed at today's copyright problem board listing to allow time for this concern to be addressed.
Based on these two articles, I am worried that you may not realize or at least may not have realized that content cannot be taken directly from most sources and added to Wikipedia, but must be properly summarized to avoid copyright infringement. The only content we may copy from most sources are brief and clearly marked quotations. Only if content is verifiably public domain or compatibly licensed can we copy it, and then we must acknowledge the copying in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism.
This is a concern in particular because many of your articles seem to rely on non-English sources for information, and I need to be sure that you are aware that translating sources and placing that translated content here is also a copyright problem. Translations, like close paraphrases, must be authorized by the copyright holder.
If you have translated and used content in this way (or followed the translations quite closely) or if you are aware of other articles into which you've copy-pasted or closely paraphrased content from English sources - even if it was a long time ago - please help to identify those so that they can be properly modified. Wikipedia's policy is that content that violates copyright must be deleted; it's much better to rewrite it as soon as we become aware a problem exists than for it to be inadvertently left to sit and develop, only to be rolled back years later. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Uherský Brod shooting you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BenLinus1214 --
BenLinus1214 (
talk)
23:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sudetendeutsches Freikorps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petrovice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
The article
Uherský Brod shooting you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Uherský Brod shooting for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BenLinus1214 --
BenLinus1214 (
talk)
22:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
You make some really good edits. Keep it up! 206.82.167.3 ( talk) 20:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
I write you with regard to the chapter "Criminal activities". It's OK if you don't agree my point of view, but I don't really like the fact that you used the term "vandalism" to describe the changes that I made, because there's a specific talk on the argument, and I participated to such talk. This voice is kind of unique and weird on Wikipedia and it shows an improper use of the encyclopedia as as a means for a political propaganda. You can search Sicilians in US, but you won't find such chapter. Well.... why don't you join the talk instead of doing such deliberate action without even consulting with the people who participated the talk? Bear in mind that there are also few nonsense statements that might need some amendment. cheers -- Amurdad ( talk) 21:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
>These drugs are often made for export to Germany, Poland, Austria and Italy, [1] as the domestic market especially for marijuana is limited due to the possibility of Czechs to grow cannabis for their own purposes legally. In 2011, 192 Czech Vietnamese were arrested for industrial hemp cultivation and production of methamphetamine. [1]
> These drugs are often made for export to
Germany,
Poland,
Austria and
Italy,
[1] as the domestic market especially for marijuana is limited due to the possibility of Czechs to
grow cannabis for their own purposes legally. In 2011, 192 Czech Vietnamese were arrested for industrial hemp cultivation and production of methamphetamine.
[1]
Regards Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 21:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
-- Amurdad ( talk) 22:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi CP, The wording is slightly off on your edit there; the core tests for the Irish firearms licence date from 1925 (and can be tracked back to the 1800s in English law before that) and are orthogonal to the European firearms directive, which doesn't speak to the requirements for a firearms licence in terms of what the applicant has to have done to qualify for one; they mostly deal with how firearms should be classified for licencing, how firearms should be marked and so forth. Most of the Irish firearms act is unaffected by the directive, having been far stricter than the directive since 1925 (the EU directive does technically take precedence, it's just that the Irish act doesn't have any portion that needed modification to comply with it with the exception of the introduction of the europass). MarkDennehy ( talk) 15:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Cheers, Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 17:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, do you think you can make the article about gun laws GA status? Your work on the Czech gun laws was excellent.
Here's a good infograph that summarizes Swiss gun laws: https://i.imgur.com/Fz3kGIJ.jpg
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Škoda Transportation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilsen ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
I agree, the dedicated article is far better than the brief overview in the Overview page, nice job. MarkDennehy ( talk) 12:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean with "opposite side". That it is a subjective view by some doesn't mean there is an equally subjective view by others. I know we live in a post-truth society, but as far as I know there is no longstanding tradition worldwide that claims that this is really some unalienable right, which is what your edit was doing in Wikipedia's voice. Drmies ( talk) 00:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I just want to let you know that I started a WP:SOCK investigation here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/2607:FEA8:88A0:184C:AD1B:4ED0:344A:B7EA. Just in case you wanted to give comments. CommanderOzEvolved ( talk) ( contribs) 10:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Prat. - Roxy, the dog. wooF 17:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Chomutov incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DGU ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:29, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyundai ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Bohumín arson attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lenora.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of massacres in the Czech Republic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Macedonia and Petřvald.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Moravian University. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 6#Moravian University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
ElKevbo (
talk)
18:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Ahoj, mohli by jste odsouhlasit tento nový článek, prosim?
Střední ž-Ž Střední ž-Ž je specifický znak, který byl navržen jako 85. písmeno moderní české abecedy, čítající dosud 42 malých a 42 velkých písmen (znak ž-Ž zastupuje font pro toto písmeno, který zatím v české Wikipedii schází). Písmeno bylo zavedeno v r. 2021 jako řešení jednoho problematického aspektu českého pravopisu – rozdíl mezi velkým a malým písmenem je totiž závazně používán k signalizaci toho, zda pisatel má na mysli skupinovou identitu náboženskou (žid) nebo národní, resp. národnostní (Žid). S poukazem na to, že tato dichotomizace nevystihuje komplexnost židovských identit, a v konkrétních textech je tedy často nepoužitelná nebo zavádějící, vznikla pravopisná podoba slova ž-Žid, zahrnující jak náboženskou, tak národní identitu v jednom slově.
Problém správného psaní slova ž-Žid v češtině je zmiňován už v roce 1887. [2] Ve smyslu národním měl být tento výraz stejně jako dnes psán s velkým Ž, zatímco žid jako příslušník náboženské skupiny se měl psát s malým ž. Aplikace tohoto pravidla však působí problémy při přepisu mluvené řeči, překládání z jiných jazyků nebo snaze vyjádřit souběžně oba významy. Židé samotní obvykle vnímají obě identity jako neoddělitelné, neboť moderní koncepty národa a náboženství se zformovaly až dlouho po vzniku židovstva. V návaznosti na tento spor upřednostňovali českoslovenští sionisté ve 20. století ve svých novinách, tiskovinách a interních dokumentech psaní s velkým písmenem, zatímco českožidovští asimilacionisté nebo židé vymezující se striktně nábožensky (charedim) často volili psaní s písmenem malým.
Osobitě byl tento problém vyřešen v českém vydání publikace Martina J. Weina [3] History of the Jews in the Bohemian Lands / Dějiny ž-Židů v českých zemích, které připravilo Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci. [4] Uplatněním klasického postupu teze, antiteze a syntézy ve vizuální a grafické rovině byl vytvořen nový glyf, kombinující horní část malého písmene ž s dolní částí velkého písmene Ž, čímž vzniklo „střední“ písmeno coby vizuální kompromis. Autorkou znaku je typografka Veronika Burianová a výslednou podobu knihy s využitím uzpůsobeného fontu Edita UPO navrhla grafička Markéta Cole. [5]
Nové písmeno podnítilo akademickou i veřejnou diskusi. Hebraista a odborník na blízkovýchodní studia Zbyněk Tarant ze Západočeské univerzity v Plzni se problematice psaní slova ž-Žid v češtině podrobně věnoval už v roce 2020. [6] Jazykovědec Jiří Nekvapil z Univerzity Karlovy v Praze považuje zavedení středního ž-Ž ve Weinově knize za další doklad toho, že česká jazyková situace se stala příznivou pro utváření variantního pravopisu češtiny, specifického pro různé funkční oblasti spisovného jazyka. [7]
Yarmuk ( talk) 10:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. You just delete other information, like the edits with France, and you are destroying the list with your edits, (see Czech section), it does no one any good to just delete everything, so please stop.
Also not providing numbers is not a valid source, the +20 are machines that have already been seen, so confirmed.
If you absolutely want to include "Undisclosed number", we can talk about it, but just slapping a big text in the list is not conducive either, again, if it is necessary, please put it at the top of the list.
Uwdwadafsainainawinfi! (
talk)
12:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Uwdwadafsainainawinfi (
talk •
contribs)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
This person can't verify data and keeps changing and adding nonsense... even if he doesn't understand the subject he is able to change a good thing to a bad thing... this user is on immediate ban (Tatra T815 is really not Tatra T815-7 as you keep editing the wrong picture, unsigned orders for weapons do not really belong in the arsenal of the Czech army and many others). Zabdas message delivery ( talk) 23:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Military Barnstar | |
Thank you for your contribution to the list of military aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War. OhanaUnited Talk page 21:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kill house, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czechoslovak Army in the West.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Cimmerian praetor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Dominik Feri that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Nat Gertler (
talk)
13:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Cimmerian praetor!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
thetechie@enwiki:
~/talk/ $
03:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
|
tyden
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Welcome!
Hello, Cimmerian praetor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
strdst_grl
(call me Stardust)
12:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Jestli jště jednou přídáš letadla Antonov do výzbroje české armady, tak tě začnu nahlašovat.... Žadná letadla české armády to nebudou, nehledně na to že nebyl podepsán jediný dokument. Je to pouze spekulace nějaká spekulace, nikde v česku to nebylo oficialně potvrzeno. Stejně tak mi vysvětli proč dávaš pistole Phantom a pušky BREN do rezervy, když tam ještě nejsou? Neskutečně prasíš tu stránku podle obrazu svému + dáváš fake news a takhle to tady nefunguje... prober se ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I don't see why you're so obsessed with editing out any mentions in the "LGBT rights in the Czech Republic" article that the Czech Republic is a country in Central-Eastern (as opposed to just Central) Europe. They're both correct geographical designations. And I do think the liberalism vis-a-vis gay rights in the Czech Republic is particularly remarkable because it's unique among ex-Communist-bloc countries. It wouldn't be very surprising compared to Western Europe, would it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.215.252.239 ( talk) 23:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the Tatra articles and even more thanks for the photos you have uploaded in Commons!
Someone has questioned the licencing of [1], could you mark there the licence so that the photo will not be deleted. -- Gwafton ( talk) 14:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Tatra 77 drag coeficiet of 0.212 is definetely made on 1:5 model, Mackerle gives 0.24 for T87 1:5 model, when the real car was tested the figure was 0.36-7, T77 is very similar, this figure of 0.212 is a great misconception! --
Tatraplan ( talk
I assume Czech is your native language. Could you help me to understand the description at the bottom of this page: [2]
How to make the difference between T54, T52 and T30? I couldn't figure it out by using Google Translator. -- Gwafton ( talk) 20:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
21:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
I have modified this template so that it works, although it is still a little buggy, as I am not an expert on this kind of template. The problem was that infoboxes require the correct use of a meta-template, {{ Infobox}}, which you had not transcluded. If you need any more help with this, I suggest you try the help desk, where you will be able to find users more experienced with infobox templates. However, if you have any other problems, feel free to contact me at any time. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 16:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I modified the sandbox page for the template, and would like to know what do you think about it ( Template:Infobox tram/sandbox). I modified (style, some of the naming, order), added () and removed (facelift, comparable models) a few things. If you think this could be used from now on, I'll update all the pages and the documentation accordingly and move this over the old template. Also, I think there could be at least two more things added (borrowing from the Polish Wikipedia): spacing of bogies and spacing of the axles in bogies. What do you think? Soeb talk| contribs 17:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Ahoj. Hezký kus práce na článku o Universitě Palackého. Přemýšlel jsi o nominaci na T:TDYK? - Darwinek ( talk) 16:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I'll happily copy-edit that for you. I'd recommend you check my edits at the University article as you may disagree with the changes in some places. I only actually removed one bit of text, I think, which to me seemed irrelevant to a largly non-Czech audience. Si Trew ( talk) 13:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I presume you meant Josef Šnejdárek? (your link didn't work for me.) Yep, I'll do that some time today for you. Glad to see the other ones have had a bit more attention too, from yourself and others. Si Trew ( talk) 14:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
Infobox military person}}
and split the article into sections, which I admit are rather short so I can see why you didn't do so. Apart from that the changes were quite minor ("fortificated" -> "fortified", "fight" -> "battle", and a few changes in putting dates earlier in the sentence, I think that's about it).{{
Translated page}}
template on its talk page?I'm copy editing this for you now; can you please (in the opening para) explain the difference between a public university and a state one? In the UK the two are the same thing. Si Trew ( talk) 08:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Reviewing the other sections now. I don't really know that there's much to add. Si Trew ( talk) 07:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Si Trew ( talk) 07:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
etymology}}
template?!).{{
anchor}}
to help guard against future breaking changes).
Si Trew (
talk)
09:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)I've changed the section titles a bit; in particular I've changed "pre-education" to "before the university" or some such, so as not to suggest we are dealing with kindergartens or whatever.
Nothing major here. I note that you tend to write the thousands separator as a dot instead of a comma. Normally I would just replace them straight in the article, but in this article I've used the {{formatnum:}}
pseudo-template to do so, since I guessed it might be easier for you kinda to force yourself to use that for all numbers, instead of remembering which way round you had to write them. (Sadism eh?) Perhaps this also works better for those using text-to-speech readers and so on, I don't know.
Si Trew (
talk)
20:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
(Re WP:ENGVAR). Sure, just use Mid-Atlantic English!
I have a similar problem with working for a company that is split half-and-half between the UK and the US. We in the UK are supposed to write in US English, but we can't really do it: while we can alter our spelling (especially with the aid of a spelling checker), we don't tend to alter the grammar or use different words (for example I changed your "rooting" [for a team] to "supporting"; I doubt it would ever even occur to me to change "support" to "root"). Most articles don't suffer much trouble with this, one does get the occasional editor – often an anonymous IP editor who is just starting out and notices an "error" – who will change a perfectly good use. As I say, it becomes more problematic with articles that have vastly different vocabularies, and transportation seems to be one of them; on geography articles, for example, I've rarely had to worry about it, beyond making sure the spelling is consistent.
I have a bit of an interest in linguistics generally, and speak a couple of languages, but no Slavic or Germanic ones, only Latinate plus a bit of Japanese and Arabic. My partner is Hungarian, so I am learning that, but slowly because I haven't anyone else to practice with. It means that although I maybe don't know much if anything of the language (as is the case with Czech, for example), I tend to be able to make educated guesses about why something might have been written a particular way, i.e. what has got lost in translation.I notice, for example, you sometimes use "the" when it is not needed, or omit it when it is, which I imagine comes from how its use differs between Czech and English. It's for the same reason that while I could use Google Translate to translate most of those road signs, and of course most of them I would know the English for them anyway, I wanted a native speaker to look over them to make sure consistent terminology or for signs we don't have (snow chains, for example).
On the whole I think your writing is very clear, though, and although suitably formal is a pleasure to read. I don't understand the school of thought that thinks big words equals big thoughts, so it is a joy to read something that's understandable, and considering that we are trying to appeal to a very wide audience, I see no problem in using "easy" words, providing of course they cover the meaning.
I hope also you don't mind if I refer you to this or that template or policy, I hope that doesn't sound like preaching. I know from my own experience, learning Wikipedia is often hard because one kinda thinks "there must be a policy to help me decide this, or someone must have written a template to do this already, but I can't find it". Personally I find searching Wikipedia very difficult. But please feel free to ignore anything I say, I won't be offended! Si Trew ( talk) 11:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
You might be able to help with one thing: at Road signs in the Czech Republic, the definitions of the signs are in Czech and need translating. While of course most of them are obvious, there will no doubt be a few that I wouldn't be able to guess at accurately. Perhaps if I attempted to translate the ones I can (i.e. just substitute what we call them in the United Kingdom), you could check it over and fill in the rest? (This came to my attention via WP:PNT) Si Trew ( talk) 08:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks with the road signs. I am trying to use the words used by the British Highway Code so I will look at those two and see what I make of it. I am sure that will not suit everyone (our American audience especially) but we can't really have both American and British English words for everything so I've taken the view one standard is better than none.
I've left the direction signs to last as the most wordy and also that I am not sure how best to translate each kind of road: Motorway, highway, and so on.
There are still a few untranslated in the other sections (marked with {{lang|cs}}
) just when I was not sure the best translation. To my surprise, Google Translate seemed to give quite a good translation most of the time.
Si Trew (
talk)
11:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks very much. I'll do any tidying from the English side, please take no offence! Nice work! Si Trew ( talk) 12:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
I wonder if the article Subsidiarity is anywhere close to what you want with self-governance. This word got the British media rather raising its eyebrows when John Major used it to describe how he wished to see the UK Parliament in relation to the European Union – I think most suspected the word was made up by eurocrats.
I do remember vaguely changing the quango article or link or something, I can't remember which way round now. I think at the time that article did more accurately cover simply non-governmental organisations, but it may have changed somewhat now and need moving again to a better title ("Self-governing body" or some such). Si Trew ( talk) 12:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm subbing Josef Šnejdárek. Is Czech: rotmistr by any chance Sergeant major? Si Trew ( talk) 14:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Czech: zástupce velitele roty: Second lieutenant? Si Trew ( talk) 14:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I've copy-edited Legal clinic as you asked. Nothing major, just the usual bits of rewording and I added a few links in. Please of course do revert/change if I have mistakenly changed any meaning.
Best wishes Si Trew ( talk) 02:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
Infobox tram}}
. As you may know, I've recently got
Old Rouen tramway to GA and have been fiddling with
Montmartre funicular amongst other things. I suggest you might have a look at those to see whether comments about what should and should not be included are valid. I didn't use {{Infobox tram}}
because I didn't think it was suitable: that may be a valid decision, or maybe indicate that it needs a few more fields or fewer. In particular, I think it should be clearer whether a tram refers to the whole network (as for
Old Rouen tramway), a particular line, or a particular model of tram no matter what line it is used on. I'd appreciate your views.
Si Trew (
talk)
18:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Ahoj. Velmi rád. Zde posílám odkaz. - Darwinek ( talk) 09:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Have you noticed that there are marked requests for sources on the old NW/Tatra photos you have uploaded in Commons? Would you fill the needed information so that they will not be deleted. I have used the same photos on the Finnish NW/Tatra articles as well and wouldn't be happy if someone deleted them.
Another matter. I found this article about T77 (in Polish). It says that the first serial produced streamliner car was Rumpler Tropfenwagen, not T77. To me it looks like the writer knows what he is talking about. Does the other information match with the sources you have used?
Moreover, the source claims that Hans Ledwinka was not the one who brought streamlining to Tatra, but it was Erich Übelacker. Übelacker joined in Tatra in 1927 and when he tried to convince Ledwinka about the benefits of the design, he had doubts about it, but told about the idea to the company board. As you know, then they started a new project called V570. Based on the experience about the second prototype, Ledwinka got convinced about the benefits of the design.
However, the story gets more interesting the deeper you go into it. This source says that the Austrian automotive pioneer Béla Barényi created a concept of a stremalined people's car with a central load carrying tube and air cooled boxer engine with a rear engine layout between 1925-1931. He went to show it to several companies including Tatra, Steyr and Porsche's newly opened engineering company. But due to the recession of early 1930's, the companies were not interested in such revolutionary ideas but put all their efforts on survival.
I read somewhere (don't remember where) that Barényi wrote about his ideas on Motor-Kritik magazine, where the main director was Josef Ganz. He made later a concept car Standard Superior. It is unclear to me, if Ganz got his ideas from Barényi or Barényi from Ganz. There are some websites in the net which claim that the honour about VW Beetle belongs to Ganz. But still I don't think the truth is that simple. I should also search for Edmund Rumpler's role in the development.
I hope these links are useful to you if you still want to improve the articles. Could you please tell me if you happen to find interesting and believable sources about the matter. -- Gwafton ( talk) 13:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Ahoj, as I know, that you are interested in modern history. There is article German occupation of Czechoslovakia, but this article looks not so good and can be improved. Can you help me? Děkuji-- Yopie ( talk) 01:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Cimmerian, sorry I have been extremely busy lately as we have just moved house a few weeks ago and have been fixing up the decor and so on. I did not expect to be moved so quickly otherwise I would have said. I will try to get around to y our requests, but please my apologies for my neglect and a very happy christmas to you if I don't catch you before.
Si Trew ( talk) 00:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
I do not know if this question is for you or for the talk page of the university entry. But the sources are in Czech so it's not one I can answer. (Also the sources are books and I do not have them.)
According to the entry on Vilém Prusinovský z Víckova "a year after his death, in 1573, his plan of promotion of the Olomouc school to Jesuit Academy was realized"
The implication of the earlier statement is that the institution was passed over to the Jesuits in 1566. Does that mean the Jesuits got it in 1566, but it only became a Jesuit academy in 1573. (In my limited understanding, the Jesuits would surely not have waited seven years...) Or does it mean that one of those dates is incorrect?
Sorry it's not more obvious to me. But it's not...
Best wishes
Charles01 ( talk) 20:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
It's not clear to the reader (at least to this reader) whether we are discussing Olomouc or the whole empire. (I didn't fancy struggling to master the source, I'm afraid!) If it's across the entire empire, then that would become clear by writing (for instance) "In 1752 the Office of Faculty Directors was established in Vienna (or Prague?)" If we're just discussing Olomouc, then of course "....at Olomouc" would do the job. Any views?
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 21:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
I do not understand if this means that a medical school was set up (separately) in Olomouc. If it wasn't, I'm not necessarily sure why this sentence belongs in the entry at all. Also, if it became a separate field around 1782, that begs the question of how was it taught before? Part of the Law or Theology syllabus? I hope not, but I am pretty ignorant on the history of medicine.
Anyway, a source is shown. If you have access to that source, maybe it is clearer to you?
I'm rather enjoying this: I hope I will not be "treading on toes". I am maybe making more changes than I had intended. Now I must go to my (English) dictionary to find out how we are meant to spell obst... obstetricians. Regards Charles01 ( talk) 17:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
This is a very picky point, but if they close the Theology Faculty repeatedly in a single year, then it must reopen almost as frequently. The comment begs more questions than (for me) it answers. If the communists did not like people learning about theology, why did they not close the faculty permanently? Or was it more a question of a succession of government sponsored raids, in which case why only during 1950? I think I would expect the same behaviour to continue for several years, "during the early 1950s". The understanding here is that things remained particularly repressive in Czechoslovakia at least until 1953 when Gottwald and Stalin died. But of course I know nothing about what was actually happening. Any insights? Charles01 ( talk) 15:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I've finally got round to copy editing this. There were not too many fa ults in English grammar, but I have changed a few piped links i.e. what the wording of the pipe is because what no doubt is common knowledge in the Czech Republic is not so in the UK (and vice versa of course); but please feel free to revert any or all of it, and no doubt I have probably introduced slips myself even though I have tried to check carefully; sometimes one can't see the meat for the potatoes.
I am sorry this has taken me so long to get around to, the missus and I have been very busy decorating our new home. My sincere best wishes. Prost! Si Trew ( talk) 07:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, read the WP:MOSFLAG or million of threads (old discussions) in the WP:CARS rgds --> Typ932 T· C 03:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
I would suggest, in a friendly way, that contributions on law faculties should be careful about using the word "Juristic" too much. The problem is that Jurist means very different things in the anglo-american tradition from what it means in the continental European tradition. I think the wikipedia entry on Jurist explains it quite well. A law expert in any country will be aware of the challenge and understand the word well enough, but there will be other readers who think they know what you mean - so they won't bother to look it up in the dictionary - but who may infer a meaning that the writer did not intend.
Just sharing the thought while I had it. Hope you don't mind. I have to switch tasks, now, and print my son's homework. I seem to be in possession of the household's only working printer. Eat your heart out, HP.
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 20:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
My eye is caught by this phrase. In 1570, surely most books were in Latin or maybe Greek. But it was generous, because either the books were mostly pretty new because newly printed or else they were hand copied. Either way they would have been horribly expensive. I wonder if there is a source that comments on the language of the books or ... what. Anyhow, it seems that when the Swedes did what they did two generations later, the library would have represented a great treasure store. Hmmm. Regards Charles01 ( talk) 15:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I think this means that the library obtained and retained a copy of every book, journal, (?newspaper), (?pamphlet) printed in Moravia between 1860 and 1946. (And from areas of Silesia during the Austro-Hungarian emp[ire period). Is that your understanding? I'm only about 90% confident that I've understood this correctly.
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 18:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I just finished with libraries section. I may come back to it if I notice anything I got very wrong, but my intention is to leave he University entry alone, at least for a bit.
There was a reference to the Eurocentre in the library section. I can guess what that is, but I don't know if I'd guess right. It maybe needs a sentence of explanation in the library section or even, if there is anything interesting to be written about it, a little section of its own. Or maybe it is very dull and the reference to it should be removed? Either way, I tried clicking on the source page indicated, but wasn't smart enough to find Eurocentre on it....
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 19:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
It's interesting going through this one in a bit of detail. It was actually reported, if only briefly, in England, possibly because it plays to some of the preconceptions the English media have about "Abroad", and / or possibly because it was a shocking and eye-catching event. Also, they always like to report anything with Hitler in the title, because the 1939-45 war (our dates for it) is one period in history where the English come out pretty unambiguously as the good guys (though I appreciate that from the heart of Joe Stalin's middle European empire that may not have looked quite as obvious as it did from London).
Actually, as far as I remember, the reporting on the BBC of the Vitkov attrocity was pretty much in line with the Czech reports. Maybe that's where they copied it from. Twenty years ago the BBC used to send correspondents to find out what was going on and report on it, but these days they increasingly depend on feeds from other agencies (at best) and otherwise devote large chunks of the news reports to pumping out half digested rehashes of press releases issued on behalf of "clients" (mostly politicians and celebrities) by "public relations professionals". But I think the BBC news reports probably still contain a higher proportion of truth than many of the English newspapers. Today there is a story all over the news about a politician's wife being photographed dressed in a sheet. That's the story. There's another one about Malawi (hang on while we find it on the map) where someone has allegedly suggested that farting in public should be made illegal. Sorry ... you didn't ask for this. But (to revert to my intended scope with this request) it would help the entry to become more complete if we were able to fill in a bit more on these appeals in the Vitkov case.
Best wishes 20:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
This reads to me as though no political party has ever, at any time, been banned in the Czech republic, except for this one.
That may be strictly speaking correct, but I would imagine that under the communists, many parties (the ones not communist) were banned in Czechoslovakia. English-language readers may not be instantly aware that the Czech republic is a new country.
I'm assuming a lot here. If I'm wrong, please tell me. But if I'm right, how about
"....which, in 2011, remains the only political party to have been banned since the creation of the Czech republic in 1993"
?
Many thanks if you have any insights to share on this. Best wishes Charles01 ( talk) 12:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
They were between them also ordered to pay damages in excess of 17 million Does this mean, that each one of them is fully responsible for the whole sum? I mean, if one of them wins a lottery of 17M, he has to pay it all, and then he can try to collect the shares from the other ones. I was not able to translate that and I am not sure if I understand it from this wording. Thank you for answer. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 12:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Best wishes Charles01 ( talk) 13:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Having mentioned that he married Marie Anna in Vienna, I can't help thinking we ought to say something about her. Eg ...was she the daughter of a Viennese lawyer called (zum Beispiel) Johann Mueller. Would she (sorry if it's there and I didn't get to it yet) be the mother of his five children? Irgendwas waere notwendig, meine Meinuing nach. Or?
Out of interest, does the fact that he married at all imply protestant tendencies despite re-Catholicization of Moravia since 1620? I wonder how that would have gone down with the folks in Vienna. In the medieval period (at least in England: as you see, I known nothing about that period in the Czech lands) university scholars were all priests and therefore officially celibate.
Charles01 ( talk) 21:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
proposing some changes: "Monse was key to the establishment of the academic history tradition in Moravia." Maybe the word historiography would be better? Or does simply "history" mean also "history science" in English? a determined reflection of his "motto": "Return the Old Glory to the Homeland!" -> that is my own translation, if there would be a better way to put it, please do so.
Hello! Your submission of
Bohdan Pomahač at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Snek01 (
talk)
22:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bohdan Pomahač, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that doctor Bohdan Pomahač performed the first full face transplant in the United States? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
(btw, I like the user name).
Any source that bank account in swiss bank was under Klaus' name? section corruption scandals. I only found sources it was ods account. otherwise Ill put it back 88.101.175.204 ( talk) 16:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Czech is the only official language of the Czech Republic, and it is spoken by about 96% of the population. SOURCE. Czech.cz is a site of MZV!
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
CIreland (
talk)
15:43, 3 May 2011 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Cimmerian praetor ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please review the reasons for my block. I brought it forward to the notice board, as the other user was just deleting what he didn't like at the Czech Republic wikipage. I tried to resolve it with him at the talk page, to no avail. I understand that I breached the 3RR. I just saw no other way to prevent the deleting attack. I did it in good faith, please instruct me how to prevent deleting of essential info without being blocked in future. Thank you.
Decline reason:
"Essential info" is in the eyes of WP:CONSENSUS. If someone else is edit-warring, you can take them to WP:AN/3RR. If you want the page protected, go to WP:RFPP. Otherwise, use WP:DR ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello! Your submission of
Lumír Ondřej Hanuš at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
![]() | On 14 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lumír Ondřej Hanuš, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that leading cannabinoid neurotransmitters researcher Lumír Ondřej Hanuš was growing cannabis on two large fields in Olomouc in the 1970s for medical purposes? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't feel 100% confident that all is well. Did I make the move you requested? Should there be an existing talk page somewhere?-- SPhilbrick T 12:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
The nomination was speedy failed. You may use the suggestions in improving the article. Moray An Par ( talk) 15:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Drop me an email and I'll send you the list along so that you can look for yourself. There are also listed "other important centres of higher learning" such as "Brno: (German) Polytechnic 1849". As for true universities my list is exhaustive, that is at least as my reference is concerned. I did not leave out a single entry. Regards Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 11:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Johann Karl Nestler, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Johann Karl Nestler was teaching scientific animal and plant breeding at the University of Olomouc in what is now the Czech Republic at the time when Gregor Mendel studied there? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Cimmerian praetor. As for this edit summary, please don't forget that the article in Reflex was a prank, not a serious claim. Btw, I don't think this incident deserves a stand alone article, however that's a topic of another discussion. -- Vejvančický ( talk | contribs) 11:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Cimmerian praetor, your explanation is not valid according to the rules of Wikipedia. You can´t make a bad article better through inserting pranks like this one about "cleptomania". You yourself admitted that it was only a prank, so in fact a vulgar lie and nothing else. Not even on the wiki:cz (which is of bad quality in respect to reporting about Mr. Klaus) this lie has been published in any way. I strongly disagree with you and your "tactics". Maybe you are of the same origin like myself, but I am sure to know much more about international politics and implications of such published "pranks" than you. The alleged incident in Chile, invented in this intensity by the Czech public television (really and very badly so), is possibly not to be directly connected with Mr. Havel, but certainly with some of his misled supporters. By the way, in our present times with all current political and economic problems, not many people outside the Czech Republic really remember Mr. Havel as a person of present-day interest and a significant political figure. And he was never an economist, or if having been a politician he sometimes was involved in economic matters, so he was a very bad economist, contrary to President Klaus. So please stop inserting this unbelievable prank into the article concerned, which certainly will be deleted as a whole in the near future, as it is completely irrelevant and totally incomprehensible with the rules of Wikipedia and conduct between civilized nations. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 10:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Oh dear, the Czech television has definitely manipulated the sequences shown. I don´t know how to explain to you that you are simply wrong. It would be much better to delete the whole article about alleged Chilean incident or to write there something in a decent way, and not to add further pranks to it, especially in a way which can be totally misinterpreted. You personally probably don´t like Mr. Klaus, but this is no reason to make him worse than he is. We are no children anymore, neither you nor me, because we are sitting at Wikipedia on Monday noon. Please stop telling people that "Klaus took the pen in a very dishonest way". Again, neither you nor me can undo the damage done to the international reputation of the Czech Republic by the dishonest reporting of the Czech TV from Chile. It is simply a mess, and only really clever tactics could solve the problem. I must fear that you will be no companion in this effort. But at least, please think of the further development in our native country. There should be a good successor in 2013 to Mr. Klaus, who on the whole has been a good president up to now. Who has predicted (yes, he has in a certain sense a good qualification for predicting) the current euro crisis already at least 10 years ago? It was Mr. Klaus, and he did much more for the well-being of the country and of a majority of its inhabitants. There are, of course, many different aspects for a final judgment on him, as things are getting more and more complicated. Further discussion of this topic might be too much for this column, but be sure that there is already a fight behind the scenes for the succession. For today, just one reply please, and no more. And I should also stop this up to now fruitless discussion with you for the rest of this day, because there are some other tasks for me. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 11:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Cimmerian praetor, you can´t exactly know either, if Klaus´ entourage did or did not claim, whether the sequence was changed or not. The point is that everything about this issue has been extremely exaggerated by personal enemies of Klaus, if you believe it or not. We should be a little bit more diplomatic in our information policy. I don´t agree that diplomacy means to exaggerate rude exaggerations by citations about alleged kleptomania or things like this. Sometimes there are other means, my friend in exile, and so in fact I can´t help you. Besides this, you are not quite well informed about the standings of Klaus abroad and how positively he is perceived among Czech compatriots e.g. in the USA and Australia. He is without any doubt a firm friend of NATO, the US and of free enterprise and trade. If you prefer Havel´s dreams of a nebulous third way between "capitalism" and communism, so there are of course no limits to you to express your opinion, but please let Klaus´ privacy untouched. Up to now you did exactly the contrary. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 10:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
My dear friend Cimmerian praetor, of course I remain polite, as I am used to it. You are the same, so we can discuss openly and freely. I am very sorry not to have enough time now to explain to you my political standings and opinions at least briefly. There are much more complicated than you probably think. Later on, if ever. What you forget in my eyes all the time is that Klaus has been a dominating figure in "Czechia" for the last 22 years. Yes, he was this figure up to very recent days, more than Havel. And now he is beseiged by his foes. There will be a successor in 2013, and I hope he (or she???) won´t come from that part of the Czech political spectrum which really doesn´t have any idea about economic matters. I am very sorry to say that unfortunately President Havel had never any suitable idea about economic matters. Klaus is appreciated by the Friedrich-von Hayek-Society in Germany. They are possibly better witnesses than your friends in Switzerland. Have a nice day -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 11:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the update. I've seen the deletion. I don't agree with it, but I will respect the majority consensus. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 12:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Actually I thought, that this debate was already closed. As far as I remember, there was no tag anymore. My bad.
Dishwashing great. Klaus greater. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 13:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to ask you what do you consider to be an accurate English equivalent of Czech terms "městská část" and "městský obvod"? Because I really don't know, in my opinion term "city district" is bit confusing because we already have Brno-City District, Ostrava-City District and Plzeň-City District which are something significantly different. -- Millenium187 ( talk) 15:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I reverted your backed only by your OR summary. czech Republic is considered as an Eastern European country by UN, just like Slovakia. Please note that Wikipedia is not a place for biased arguments but instead reliable sources are accepted only. ItsAlwaysLupus ( talk) 17:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
In my opinion, it is geographically not correct to say Czech Republic would be an Eastern European country. Prague is located much more to the West then Vienna. Czech Republic is located between Germany and Austria, etc. For some statistical purposes, European Statistical Office in Luxembourg counts the Czech Republic to Western Europe, whereas Slovakia belongs there to Eastern Europe. This might be more or less artificial, but Central Europe is definitely correct. Czech Republic, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and Austria are certainly located in the middle of the continent. They do not possess any maritime coast. Slovakia and Hungary can be also counted to this category, but with somewhat lesser justification to Central Europe. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 15:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Tatra 77 coeficient is given 0.212 (Not for T77a) - the actual source I cannot find, can you let me know in which book this is stated as a fact. I give the comparison with T87 as an example, which for the 1:5 model was 0.24 as given by Mackerle. Real car is 0.36. Ir is logical that similar reading was for T77 which is very similar. It is nonsense to quote the figure of 0.212 for the real car, they did not test full size cars in tunnels before SWW... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatraplan ( talk • contribs) 09:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes but does Janiga claim the figure is for a real car?? Surely you see the logic if T87 is 0.24 for 1:5 model and real car 0.36, it is impossible for T77a to have such a large difference in the reading for a real car! This misinformation has been on the internet and in some misinformed publications and it needs to be put right (we are hoping to arrange a tunnel test soon to put this to bed for good) in the meantime the figure 0.212 should be used with great caution and not given as a fact just because Janiga used it, Mackerle is much better informed source on this subject matter and this should be stated in the T77 article... ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC).
We are looking for a sponsor for the tunnel testing, will let you know when that happens. Tatra only tested models. Kieselbach in 'Stromlinienautos in Europa und USA' book (1982) also clearly states for T87 1:5 model in 1941 0.244, real car tested in VW tunnel in 1979 0.36, he does not give any figures (quite rightly for T77 or T77a) see page 19. I am still looking where the figure of 0.212 originally came from and it must have been long before Janiga who must be simply repeating it without questioning it, is there a source where he is quoting from? Where did he get it from if you give him such confidence? There is nothing in Rosencranz as far as I know, as I say caution is necessary if Janiga cannot give a proper source... ( Tatraplan ( talk) 11:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC) )
Exactly my point, how can you put that information as a given fact in the wiki? That is not a properly sourced scientific fact if Janiga cannot confirm it - hence I ask you please to qualify this in the text of the T77 article as this has done enough damage already. Thanks for understanding. Tatraplan ( talk) 12:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I didn't say that he canno qualify it. I don't have the book on me. The fact is that it is a specialist in the field who claims this figure. What is the basis of his claim, I don't know. But in line with WP:Original research we cannot just say, that it is unprobable, unless there are sources for such a claim. All you provide are sources for T 87 Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 13:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
If a specialist/academic gives a figure it has to have a scientific back up and be properly sourced as is required by the wiki, if it is not sourced, it is worthless and cannot be quoted. I provide the T87 figures for comparison only and because they are the only ones available which are properly quoted and sourced, none such figures exist for T77. Hence the figure 0.212 cannot be taken as a fact... Tatraplan ( talk) 13:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Last night I have been in touch with a colleague Tatra researcher and writer, he confirmed that years ago he copied the drag coefficient figures from the Tatra archives and all the figures up to T87 were given for 1:5 models only. I have asked him to obtain a copy of these documents (this may take some time) and will let you know once I have them. This mess needs to be put right as soon as possible. Tatraplan ( talk) 10:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Will do, but SURELY Tatra Works archive documents are the best and most reliable info, from 'the lion's den', than for example Janiga's who probably picked the information from many unreliable, un-sourced or unsupported internet sites??? Tatraplan ( talk) 08:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
What is the reason? Archive data is published in the archive. By coping it into a book (and sometimes badly) it only gets distorted as the case above indicates - does not make sense, when someone submits a PhD which is original research is that all bunk according to Wiki? Tatraplan ( talk) 13:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, understand but still bit of a grey area here, any book published data should always have a source, citation, otherwise there is no proof that they are an invention by the writer, so it works really both ways, not everything published in books or articles is 'God' given, that is the problem... Tatraplan ( talk) 08:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, what do you mean unnecessary?? its facts that formed our country, if my language is poor why dont you correct it instead of deleting everything? thanks for reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jirka.h23 ( talk • contribs) 12:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks I have made a clarification
During April and May 1945 an estimated 1.6 million Germans from Polish Silesia fled the advancing Soviet forces and became refugees in Bohemia-Moravia. Thus according to German estimates there were 4.5 million German civilians present in Bohemia-Moravia in May 1945. [http://z-g-v.de/doku/archiv/frameset04_1.htm Die Vertreibung der deutschen Bevölkerung aus der Tschechoslowakei Band 1 (in German) Page 18 -- Woogie10w ( talk) 18:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
This is the German text
Zu den etwa 100 000 unterzubringenden Slowakeideutschen kamen annähernd 1,6 Millionen Reichsdeutsche, fast ausschließlich aus den schlesischen Provinzen, deren Fluchtweg in die Sudetenländer führte7. Da seit Ende März/Anfang April auch das Ostsudetenland und Mähren Kampfgebiet wurden, ballte sich zur Zeit der Kapitulation die Masse der Flüchtlinge auf dem Weg nach Westen auf böhmischem Gebiet zusammen. Nur einem kleinen Teil war es damals schon gelungen, Bayern zu erreichen oder ins westliche Sachsen auszuweichen; etwa eine Million
18 erlebte den deutschen Zusammenbruch mit seinen bitteren Begleiterscheinungen im Sudetenland und Protektorat. Die zu diesem Zeitpunkt in Böhmen und Mähren-Schlesien anwesenden deutschen Zivilpersonen lassen sich mit mindestens 4,5 Millionen beziffern.
-- Woogie10w ( talk) 18:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Dobrý den,jsem toho názoru, že Česká republika vznikla v roce 1969, například Československo, vzniklo v roce 1918, ale VZNIKLO, né se osamostanilo, jelikož předtím žádné nebylo, tedy i Česká (byť socialistická) republika vznikla 1.1.1969, předtím žádná neexistovala, byl zde unitární stát, já chápu, že může mít někdo k tomu výhrady z hlediska systému a událostí té doby, ale přeci proto nebudeme přepisovat dějiny. Poté byl pouze změněn název a přijata státní vlajka a státní znak. Po zániku ČSFR se tato existující republika osamostatnila. Zpochybňovat kontinuitu dnešní republiky s ČSR, by bylo trochu divné, copak někdo zpochybňoval kontinuitu Československa v roce 1991 ? Kolikrát tu byl změněn název ? ...Republika Československá, Česko-Slovenská republika, Československá republika, Československá socialistická republika, Československá federativní republika, Česká a Slovenská Federativní Republika, nemluvě o státním zřízení...ne, bylo to stále jedno Československo... Takže tedy i dnešní Česká republika má své počátky. Základy našeho státu, byly položeny v roce 1969, přesně tak, jak uvádí česká verze o ČR. Mělo by zde být uvedeno: vznik 1.1.1969 (v rámci federace), změna názvu 6.3.1990, 1.1.1993 (plná samostatnost).
Dobrý den, provedl jsem změny na stránce 'Doktor práv'. Právo udělovat tento titul má stále Fakulta právnická Západočeské univerzity. Fakulta právnická ZČU je oprávněna uskutečňovat studium v doktorském studijním programu "Teoretické právní vědě", v oborech:
Občanské právo (s akreditací do 5. května 2013), Obchodní právo (s akreditací do 30. dubna 2013), Trestní právo (s akreditací do 5. května 2013).
http://fpr.zcu.cz/study/doktorske_studium/
S pozdravem 147.228.209.182 ( talk) 08:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Rovněž jsem na stránce 'Právnická fakulta' opravil nepravdivé tvrzení o Fakultě právnické ZČU, neboť tato fakulta má magisterský studijní obor akreditována až do 31. 7. 2016 a na fakultě tento obor dosud studuje na 1500 studentů. Rovněž Ministerstvo školství dosud nevydalo žádné rozhodnutí, aby plzeňská právnická fakulta letos nepřijímala nové studenty.
S pozdravem 147.228.209.182 ( talk) 08:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
The details you mention are definitely relevant, just not in the LEAD. The LEAD summarizes the topic of the article, and the topic of the article is the 15 T. The text in question is certainly valid, but should be moved to a section on the development process. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 00:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
The reference you used was outdated and frankly questionable. It has since come out that he has not been charged with anything. Please refrain from adding unreliable information to wikipedia. -- Williamsburgland ( talk) 22:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Directly from your article:
Podle jednoho z účastníků tehdejšího koncertu došlo k napadení fanouška poté, co vylezl mezi skladbami na pódium. "Byl vržen po zádech směrem do davu, letěl obloukem a dopadl pozadu přímo na hlavu," popsal svědek pro Aktuálně.cz.
Does it not say that Blythe was attacked?-- Williamsburgland ( talk) 22:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Pankrác Prison at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
09:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've looked at the article and while it's very interesting it's not a 5x expansion [3]. It needs a bit more. I know it's difficult to expand already-sizeable articles five times but that's the DYK rules. VolunteerMarek 16:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
How do you define the area of liberated Poland? Should you also count in the Polish area east from Curzon line which Soviet Union liberated for themselves? How about the German territory which was only later annexed to Poland? I think it is impossible to give an objective figure. -- Gwafton ( talk) 08:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Chamberlain's quote at the top of the article is a good addition. Pelarmian ( talk) 12:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Freedom of speech by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Institute of technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collegium Nobilium ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 26 January 2013, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Czech presidential election, 2013, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Jayron 32 17:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kunovice ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Dear Cimmerian praetor, you know the stage quite well. I just deleted something which was not necessary, not really enriching the article - which is quite problematic anyway. What is the impact of some "world records" to the situation in the Czech Republic after the amnesty? And be sure, any moves against Klaus in this case will be juridically turned down. He had a constitutional right to release an amnesty. So petitions are really only typical Czech activism. There is too much of it, since 1990. The situation is not good, and will not get better. -- Zbrnajsem ( talk) 10:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Randy Blythe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encore ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Dear Cimmerian praetor,
It's not the lack of sourcing that is the problem with the sentence in "Bail". It's that the sentence (i) is nothing to do with England and Wales, (ii) appears to have nothing to do with bail at all (are you thinking it's something to do with the etymology?) (iii) is as far as I can see quite wrong (the authoritative Latin dictionary by Lewis and Short mentions bajulus meaning a porter, a day-labourer, a bearer at a funeral and a letter-carrier, with no meaning in a legal context at all; A H M Jones' magisterial History of the Later Roman Empire, very strong on administrative history, does not mention the term). I really don't think it should stay.
Deipnosophista
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Škoda Popular, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cc ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
16:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Looking at this, I think you're pretty well okay. Just a few points. One, was the backbone chassis used for the entire Škoda size range? If so, I'd add that (rather than the displacements, which seem more apt for the individual pages). Two, what was the source of the issue over lack of tortional stiffness? What model/model range/year? I'd add it. "Škoda's second highest type" Is that in price or size? Both? (My understanding is, bigger meant costlier at that time, but I'm not completely sure.) Clarifying would be helpful. "similar to its contemporary pricing policy" Contemporary to what? Then, or now? Strictly speaking, contemporary would be at that time, so this is a bit unclear. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 27 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a shortage of firearms caused the World War II 1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka to have to turn away new recruits? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1st Czechoslovak Partisan Brigade of Jan Žižka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 08:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vietnamese ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Cimmerian praetor, I'm contacting you because we need some Czech translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on cs.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Czech Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
please let me know what you need translated and I will be glad to help. As regards the message, I should be able to get to that during the weekend, as regards the Editor, I will see what I can do. Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 05:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Názvy zrušených dekretú jsem zkopíroval přímo ze Sbírky zákonů, každý si může správnost ověřit, ve sbírce je pochopitelně uvedeno zda zákon platí nebo ne, vytvoření takového seznamu je čistě mechanická záležitost. Výjimkou je 245/1946 Sb. u kterého je vyznačeno, že není platný, ale není uvedeno datum ukončení platnosti. PB0305 ( talk) 09:56, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
{ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Gregor_Mendel&diff=566955504&oldid=566936911 that's what the book says]. Have you read it? 512bits ( talk) 11:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm Brambleberry of RiverClan, GOCE copyeditor for this article. When I added the clarification tag, that was because I didn't understand what "taking a third one" meant. ö Brambleberry of RiverClan 15:12, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
| Hello, Cimmerian praetor. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Randy Blythe manslaughter case at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! ö Brambleberry of RiverClan 23:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Harok family murder. Since you contributed to the Harok family murder article, [4] I though that I would let you know about the BLPN discussion. Your efforts to develop the article are good, but I think there may be room for revision. -- Jreferee ( talk) 05:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 02:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Randy Blythe manslaughter case you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
North8000 --
North8000 (
talk)
03:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
Randy Blythe manslaughter case you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Randy Blythe manslaughter case for comments about the article. Well done!
Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 ( talk) 02:17, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
You might have an opinion on this: Talk:Ford Taunus P1
Regards Charles01 ( talk) 09:17, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
The first time I read this I thought it was telling me that gun/weapon production accounts for a higher proportion of the manufacturing sector in Czechia than it does of the manufacturing sector in any other EU country. I was about to resequence the sentence accordingly. But then I looked more closely. I'm not sure it tells us anything - except by way of innuendo - about the relative weighting/importance of gun making / weapon making within the Czech manufacturing sector. I understand that gun manufacturing is or may be more important to the Czech economy than to other EU economies. And that might be true. But I don't think that is what the source says. And unless a source can be found that DOES say that, I'm not sure this point belongs here. Though yes, it COULD be a powerful point if (1) true and (2) sourced.
Or is the point simply that manufacturing is very important to the Czech economy? In which case, yes indeed. But is that sufficiently relevant to Gun politics to belong in the introduction/summary here?
Or am I being tiresomely picky? Charles01 ( talk) 09:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Here it is. Hopefully we can reach an agreement. -- RevivesDarks ( talk) 15:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gun politics in the Czech Republic you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tezero --
Tezero (
talk)
02:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The article
Gun politics in the Czech Republic you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Gun politics in the Czech Republic for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tezero --
Tezero (
talk)
00:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The article
Gun politics in the Czech Republic you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Gun politics in the Czech Republic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tezero --
Tezero (
talk)
20:04, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Overview of gun laws by nation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FMJ. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 4 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gun politics in the Czech Republic, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that firearms laws in the Czech Republic allow people to carry concealed firearms for self defense? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gun politics in the Czech Republic. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Overview of gun laws by nation may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Overview of gun laws by nation may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on the Uherský Brod shooting. I have nominated it as an In the News item, crediting you as its best contributor. You can go there to add to the debate about whether it should be on the front page under In the News. '''tAD''' ( talk) 02:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Velika Ivanča shooting — when I first heard of the Uhersky shooting I was reminded of this and I used it as justification for the In The News nomination. There are some similarities, as it was the worst in the country's peacetime history. According to the article, this Serbian shooter was not known to be mentally ill (despite a family history) so I'm not sure if it's as justified as a see also. '''tAD''' ( talk) 15:54, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to the above-referenced article. However, I was forced to remove sections of text in violation of speculation and synthesis. Yours, Quis separabit? 12:10, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation, but I can not take part as I have limited proficiency and expertise in the subject matter. I believe that a good and fair judgement can be reached without my involvement. Thank you '''tAD''' ( talk) 21:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Template:Infobox tram has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
20:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Legal clinic, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Clinical Legal Education-Third Wave from Clinical Law review Vol 7:1, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Legal clinic saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 203.45.10.187 ( talk) 23:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. After closing out the listing for Legal clinic, I glanced quickly at a few of your other contributions and found another edit that concerns me, at Academic degree, with content copied directly from [5]. This article is now blanked and listed at today's copyright problem board listing to allow time for this concern to be addressed.
Based on these two articles, I am worried that you may not realize or at least may not have realized that content cannot be taken directly from most sources and added to Wikipedia, but must be properly summarized to avoid copyright infringement. The only content we may copy from most sources are brief and clearly marked quotations. Only if content is verifiably public domain or compatibly licensed can we copy it, and then we must acknowledge the copying in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism.
This is a concern in particular because many of your articles seem to rely on non-English sources for information, and I need to be sure that you are aware that translating sources and placing that translated content here is also a copyright problem. Translations, like close paraphrases, must be authorized by the copyright holder.
If you have translated and used content in this way (or followed the translations quite closely) or if you are aware of other articles into which you've copy-pasted or closely paraphrased content from English sources - even if it was a long time ago - please help to identify those so that they can be properly modified. Wikipedia's policy is that content that violates copyright must be deleted; it's much better to rewrite it as soon as we become aware a problem exists than for it to be inadvertently left to sit and develop, only to be rolled back years later. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Uherský Brod shooting you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BenLinus1214 --
BenLinus1214 (
talk)
23:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sudetendeutsches Freikorps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petrovice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
The article
Uherský Brod shooting you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Uherský Brod shooting for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BenLinus1214 --
BenLinus1214 (
talk)
22:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
You make some really good edits. Keep it up! 206.82.167.3 ( talk) 20:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
I write you with regard to the chapter "Criminal activities". It's OK if you don't agree my point of view, but I don't really like the fact that you used the term "vandalism" to describe the changes that I made, because there's a specific talk on the argument, and I participated to such talk. This voice is kind of unique and weird on Wikipedia and it shows an improper use of the encyclopedia as as a means for a political propaganda. You can search Sicilians in US, but you won't find such chapter. Well.... why don't you join the talk instead of doing such deliberate action without even consulting with the people who participated the talk? Bear in mind that there are also few nonsense statements that might need some amendment. cheers -- Amurdad ( talk) 21:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
>These drugs are often made for export to Germany, Poland, Austria and Italy, [1] as the domestic market especially for marijuana is limited due to the possibility of Czechs to grow cannabis for their own purposes legally. In 2011, 192 Czech Vietnamese were arrested for industrial hemp cultivation and production of methamphetamine. [1]
> These drugs are often made for export to
Germany,
Poland,
Austria and
Italy,
[1] as the domestic market especially for marijuana is limited due to the possibility of Czechs to
grow cannabis for their own purposes legally. In 2011, 192 Czech Vietnamese were arrested for industrial hemp cultivation and production of methamphetamine.
[1]
Regards Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 21:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
-- Amurdad ( talk) 22:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi CP, The wording is slightly off on your edit there; the core tests for the Irish firearms licence date from 1925 (and can be tracked back to the 1800s in English law before that) and are orthogonal to the European firearms directive, which doesn't speak to the requirements for a firearms licence in terms of what the applicant has to have done to qualify for one; they mostly deal with how firearms should be classified for licencing, how firearms should be marked and so forth. Most of the Irish firearms act is unaffected by the directive, having been far stricter than the directive since 1925 (the EU directive does technically take precedence, it's just that the Irish act doesn't have any portion that needed modification to comply with it with the exception of the introduction of the europass). MarkDennehy ( talk) 15:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Cheers, Cimmerian praetor ( talk) 17:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, do you think you can make the article about gun laws GA status? Your work on the Czech gun laws was excellent.
Here's a good infograph that summarizes Swiss gun laws: https://i.imgur.com/Fz3kGIJ.jpg
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Škoda Transportation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilsen ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
I agree, the dedicated article is far better than the brief overview in the Overview page, nice job. MarkDennehy ( talk) 12:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean with "opposite side". That it is a subjective view by some doesn't mean there is an equally subjective view by others. I know we live in a post-truth society, but as far as I know there is no longstanding tradition worldwide that claims that this is really some unalienable right, which is what your edit was doing in Wikipedia's voice. Drmies ( talk) 00:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I just want to let you know that I started a WP:SOCK investigation here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/2607:FEA8:88A0:184C:AD1B:4ED0:344A:B7EA. Just in case you wanted to give comments. CommanderOzEvolved ( talk) ( contribs) 10:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Prat. - Roxy, the dog. wooF 17:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Chomutov incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DGU ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:29, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Cimmerian praetor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyundai ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Bohumín arson attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lenora.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of massacres in the Czech Republic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Macedonia and Petřvald.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Moravian University. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 6#Moravian University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
ElKevbo (
talk)
18:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Ahoj, mohli by jste odsouhlasit tento nový článek, prosim?
Střední ž-Ž Střední ž-Ž je specifický znak, který byl navržen jako 85. písmeno moderní české abecedy, čítající dosud 42 malých a 42 velkých písmen (znak ž-Ž zastupuje font pro toto písmeno, který zatím v české Wikipedii schází). Písmeno bylo zavedeno v r. 2021 jako řešení jednoho problematického aspektu českého pravopisu – rozdíl mezi velkým a malým písmenem je totiž závazně používán k signalizaci toho, zda pisatel má na mysli skupinovou identitu náboženskou (žid) nebo národní, resp. národnostní (Žid). S poukazem na to, že tato dichotomizace nevystihuje komplexnost židovských identit, a v konkrétních textech je tedy často nepoužitelná nebo zavádějící, vznikla pravopisná podoba slova ž-Žid, zahrnující jak náboženskou, tak národní identitu v jednom slově.
Problém správného psaní slova ž-Žid v češtině je zmiňován už v roce 1887. [2] Ve smyslu národním měl být tento výraz stejně jako dnes psán s velkým Ž, zatímco žid jako příslušník náboženské skupiny se měl psát s malým ž. Aplikace tohoto pravidla však působí problémy při přepisu mluvené řeči, překládání z jiných jazyků nebo snaze vyjádřit souběžně oba významy. Židé samotní obvykle vnímají obě identity jako neoddělitelné, neboť moderní koncepty národa a náboženství se zformovaly až dlouho po vzniku židovstva. V návaznosti na tento spor upřednostňovali českoslovenští sionisté ve 20. století ve svých novinách, tiskovinách a interních dokumentech psaní s velkým písmenem, zatímco českožidovští asimilacionisté nebo židé vymezující se striktně nábožensky (charedim) často volili psaní s písmenem malým.
Osobitě byl tento problém vyřešen v českém vydání publikace Martina J. Weina [3] History of the Jews in the Bohemian Lands / Dějiny ž-Židů v českých zemích, které připravilo Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci. [4] Uplatněním klasického postupu teze, antiteze a syntézy ve vizuální a grafické rovině byl vytvořen nový glyf, kombinující horní část malého písmene ž s dolní částí velkého písmene Ž, čímž vzniklo „střední“ písmeno coby vizuální kompromis. Autorkou znaku je typografka Veronika Burianová a výslednou podobu knihy s využitím uzpůsobeného fontu Edita UPO navrhla grafička Markéta Cole. [5]
Nové písmeno podnítilo akademickou i veřejnou diskusi. Hebraista a odborník na blízkovýchodní studia Zbyněk Tarant ze Západočeské univerzity v Plzni se problematice psaní slova ž-Žid v češtině podrobně věnoval už v roce 2020. [6] Jazykovědec Jiří Nekvapil z Univerzity Karlovy v Praze považuje zavedení středního ž-Ž ve Weinově knize za další doklad toho, že česká jazyková situace se stala příznivou pro utváření variantního pravopisu češtiny, specifického pro různé funkční oblasti spisovného jazyka. [7]
Yarmuk ( talk) 10:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. You just delete other information, like the edits with France, and you are destroying the list with your edits, (see Czech section), it does no one any good to just delete everything, so please stop.
Also not providing numbers is not a valid source, the +20 are machines that have already been seen, so confirmed.
If you absolutely want to include "Undisclosed number", we can talk about it, but just slapping a big text in the list is not conducive either, again, if it is necessary, please put it at the top of the list.
Uwdwadafsainainawinfi! (
talk)
12:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Uwdwadafsainainawinfi (
talk •
contribs)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
This person can't verify data and keeps changing and adding nonsense... even if he doesn't understand the subject he is able to change a good thing to a bad thing... this user is on immediate ban (Tatra T815 is really not Tatra T815-7 as you keep editing the wrong picture, unsigned orders for weapons do not really belong in the arsenal of the Czech army and many others). Zabdas message delivery ( talk) 23:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Military Barnstar | |
Thank you for your contribution to the list of military aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War. OhanaUnited Talk page 21:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kill house, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czechoslovak Army in the West.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Cimmerian praetor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Dominik Feri that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Nat Gertler (
talk)
13:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Cimmerian praetor!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
thetechie@enwiki:
~/talk/ $
03:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
|
tyden
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).