This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Cassianto. You seem to have forgotten to add an edit summary for that revert? Just two questions immediately sprang to mind: 1. "Ann West, the mother of Lesley Ann Downey, was at the centre of a campaign to ensure that Hindley was never released from prison, and until West's death in February 1999, she regularly gave television and newspaper interviews whenever Hindley's release was rumoured." Do you think that sentence is adequately supported by the existing source? The ip edits seemed an improvement. 2. "Then Home Secretary David Waddington imposed a whole life tariff on Hindley in 1989, after she confessed to having been more involved in the murders than she had admitted." The source for that, again not a very good one, suggests it was 1990, as the ip had put. When was it? Not too sure why you reverted after only 16 minutes, with no explanation. Martinevans123 ( talk) 22:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld's next FAC of which I'm a co-nominator. Feel free to leave comments at the FAC page. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 02:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I've decided not to remove the star from my userpage in contrast to your polite request. If you wish to make a complaint against me, feel free to do so, if not, this matter is officially settled. Cheers, Jonas Vinther • ( Click here to collect your price!) 20:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
OK, I think enough has been said on this. Jonas, Bede did request a great deal of input over Cooper. I reviewed it extensively for GA and then a number of us further reviewed it before the FAC after my concern with it were met. I was honestly under the impression that it was largely a solo effort by Bede and I don't believe he co-nommed the article with anybody else. I don't remember seeing your name once during any of the reviews, I may be mistaken. It does look like you're claiming to have written the entire article when you didn't, though perhaps you made enough of the copyediting to add it to your user page with (some additions and copyedits) in brackets. Can you please do that and we can move on? If not then I can see other editors complaining about it in future. Ultimately it doesn't matter, we are a collaborative project, but a lot of work does go into promoting articles and if you didn't actually fully write an article and take an article to FAC but simply edited it then you should say so IMO.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Cassianto, the right way to make indented comments in numbered lists is to begin with a hash and follow with colons, like this:
giving:
When you just use colons, as you've been doing at the last two or three RfAs, you break the numbering. -- Stfg ( talk) 08:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Did you notice that I added two WP:RS to an article, and then two editors(including an Admin) blanked that section, because they didn't like what the RS actually said? Surely that is not proper Wikipedia procedure? Nicholas Griggs ( talk) 05:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The "I'm not an odious twat, I'm a true British gent" Award of Excellence | |
'Bout time you deserved a barnstar for your outstanding civility displayed towards Chillum and Rationalobserver of late, two editors whom the "Cult of Corbett" may raise eyebrows at. Here's to your health sir and for being one of the least odious chaps around here at the moment and telling it how it is. At least you're honest and know a real odious twat when you see one! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC) |
More to the point, I think you need this one:
Pony!
Congratulations! For creative use of very bad language and fierce defense of what is right and just, regardless of personal cost, you have received a
pony! Ponies are cute, intelligent, cuddly, friendly (most of the time, though with notable exceptions), promote good will, encourage patience, and enjoy carrots. Treat your pony with respect and he will be your faithful friend!
Montanabw
(talk)
21:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
To send a pony or a treat to other wonderful and responsible editors,
click here.
That had nothing to do with whether I liked it or not, I'm merley enforcing WP:POLEMIC . KoshVorlon 17:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hiya Cass, replying to this here. "lovely to see you back for another season" - haha well put, that's exactly what I do isn't it? Appear for a season and then go off again. I like to keep a low [as possible] profile these days which is why I'm not announcing a return or anything (plus I have no idea how long it will last, I'm sure I'll need a break again!) But yes, HELLO! Things are good with me, hope they are with you and the family too. -- Loeba (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
(and inclination, of course). Can I interest you in Streatham's leading non-Irish Irish composer, who is now at PR? All comments gladly received if you're disposed to look in. (Quite understand if you're not, naturally. I know how busy you are.) – Tim riley talk 18:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello there! I hope you're not busy as I would like to ask you for a favor. When/if you have some time, please have a look at Sonam Kapoor and see if you can give it a copy-edit. Thanks for your time and sorry for bothering you. -- Frankie talk 21:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Frankie talk 21:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
For now, It's time to go. Real life is pretty hectic for me at the moment; work is going completely mental and a family move is scheduled for the new year (albeit only 20 or so miles up the road). I'm sure all this shit will be here when I return, which I shall, at some point, but I'm certainly not in a hurry. Cassianto Talk 17:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I have blocked you for two weeks for violating out sockpuppetry policy to avoid scrutiny. Admins, this is a Checkuser block. Please contact me if you have any questions. -- Guerillero | Parlez Moi 17:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I was the one who oversighted the edits in question. -- Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
You have been unblocked per AGF that you edited logged out by mistake. IMO you had no reason to hide, as the edits weren't disruptive: compare the highly respected users protesting against the block above. @ Guerillero: The user has said the IP was his, so CU gives no special authority here. It's purely a question of whether or not to assume good faith. About oversighting the edits in question: you must have done that after I hid the IP, because at the time I did, it was all hanging out in the page histories. Bishonen | talk 20:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC).
I didn't want to needlessly embarrass you, but you've posted the wrong SPI. You can find the right one here. The one you posted concerned the possibility of additional sockpuppets, which is an entirely separate matter. Viriditas ( talk) 06:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
...seems to be unpopular...hopefully not because prose is boring :P ...can you take a layperson's look and let me know if unappealing? Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Kailash29792 has nominated the article for FAC. Feel free to leave comments at its FAC page. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
I know that I've disagreed with you in the past. If I've said anything that was offensive to you, I do apologize. I do truly and honestly appreciate all the hard work you do to provide good content to this project. I haven't said it before, so I say it now: Thank you. — Ched : ? 21:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
I've seen this coming. In November 2014, I advised & pleaded with Arbcom, to not ban anybody at the end of the GGTF case. My advice shouldn't have been overlooked. :( GoodDay ( talk) 22:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Suggest no longer interacting with Lynn or KG except in regards to RO's behaviour. No point in indulging their activism. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 11:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Glad you saw it; blink of an eye and you miss it these days. Giano (talk) 20:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Jesus loves you!
Elizium23 (
talk)
02:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Enough of
this behavior. Your comments are incendiary and baiting. Too combative, right now.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
18:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I wish you'd reconsider, Cassianto. GoodDay ( talk) 14:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Have a decent break completely away from the site and come back when you're ready to contribute again. We still remember your many fine contributions!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
The Resilient Barnstar | |
I hope this is only a temporary absence, and that you'll be back with us, hopefully early next year, all refreshed and ready to put together another superb article for us.
I'll miss your help and friendship while you're away and I'll float a couple of possible ideas your way in a couple of months to see if any of them can tempt you back. Pip pip! – SchroCat ( talk) 10:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC) |
Indeed, seconded. Hopefully we can look forward to further articles like Joseph Grimaldi at some point. Look after yourself amigo.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 16:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! | ||
A very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and all your loved ones, and a joyous and prosperous 2016.
|
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | ||
|
Indeed SchroCat. Cass, should you ever feel like returning I'd love to see you get David Garrick, a vital article, to FA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
I would welcome your input on a suggestion I've just made on their 'presumably' being lovers in the William Terriss article Talk section. Robocon1 ( talk) 11:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto, I just sent you an e-mail. :-) Greetings from German Wikipedia, -- Paulae ( talk) 18:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The tributes to David Bowie has lasted all day today on 24 Hours News and put everything else on hold (except the weather forecast) and well worth viewing. Sorry that you missed it. Dickie birdie ( talk) 19:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Future Perfect at Sunrise and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, -- QEDK ( T 📖 C) 11:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
but I'm afraid I've mentioned you here. Sorry. -- Dweller ( talk) 11:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Well, the article referred to the other film as his "last film", when it clearly wasn't; Sky Captain was, so I thought I'd mention it. No need to get upset and start making threats. DetroitWheels74 ( talk) 20:03, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Cassianto, We corresponded once about your valuable work on Marie Lloyd. It's a bit out of your line, but I think you know a lot of good people, and the article on Ethel M. Dell, George Orwell's bete noire, and Wodehouse's, could use strengthening. She was, according to Orwell, English womanhood's favorite novelist from 1911 to 1939, broadly popular, he was surprised to note, among all classes and types. Ruskin said, "Tell me what you like and I'll tell you who you are." She could tell us something about who those women were. If you happen to know anyone who does the English popular novel, would you pass this request along? Profhum ( talk) 01:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
...to see you back, mister. Kafka Liz ( talk) 20:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for your comments at the recent PR for Isabella Beeton. I have dropped the good lady into FAC for comments and thoughts. If you have time for any, I'd be delighted to hear with them. Cheers – SchroCat ( talk) 15:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You left me a message previously about Bowie (and me being a keyboard warrior). From the work you have done on the article you have greater knowledge of Bowie than myself, so I'm asking you to take a look at the new addition to Bowie's religion and spirituality. Does it accurately represent him? That first quote (if legit) about his belief in God seems conclusive. Thoughts? WisconsinPat. ( talk) 18:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for helping with that article. I really appreciate it. It is one of a number that came out of an editathon at Goldsmith's Uni where I trained several new editors, some with disabilities themselves, to make a start on editing Wikipedia. They have planned two more sessions and are looking for trainers (hint, if you're interested). I am also looking at ways that they can network and have regular editing sessions, so anybody in the London area (note for talk page stalkers) who would like to get involved with a very worthy endeavour could just drop a note on User talk:JTdisabilityartsonline or let Richard Neville know at the WMUK office. Cheers -- RexxS ( talk) 00:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Vandal! ;) SchroCat ( talk) 20:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
There are two motions proposed ( here and here) regarding an arbitration case request where you are a named party. For the arbitration committee, Liz Read! Talk! 13:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
My apologies for the problems I may had caused in welcoming new editors. I just wanted to welcome the new editors who signed up and provide them with information about the project. Thank you- RFD ( talk) 18:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Will take a look. I remember that fondly, though it came out later in the States. Kafka Liz ( talk) 16:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, not sure you remember me and how active you are these days but I would appreciate it if you make constructive criticism in my ongoing FAC. Thank you. -- Frankie talk 21:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Cassianto. James Murray (physician), an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 00:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC) |
Hello C. The good - The two one act plays by John Mortimer that featured Hordern have been released on DVD. The bad - I could not find where they are available in a region 2 release. I have the DVD and they are an enjoyable watch so maybe you will be able to find them streaming on the web somewhere if you are interested. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 23:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
On 7 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Murray (physician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irish doctor James Murray, who discovered what would become Milk of Magnesia, is an ancestor of the actor Michael Hordern? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Murray (physician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cass, I've been working on the Siege of Sidney Street recently, and I've just taken it to PR. If you have time, and if the topic is of interest, would you be able to take a look? Cheers – SchroCat ( talk) 22:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto. Can I ask for a review on Ride the Lightning, which I recently nominated for an FA? The nomination is here. All the best.-- Retrohead ( talk) 13:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
I honestly wasn't having a dig at you Cass (in US: "taking a shot at you")- if it reads like that, then I apologize. As far as continuing the discussion, I'm content either way. (continuing, or dropping it). — Ched : ? 02:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
With pleasure. Well done. Ceoil ( talk) 19:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
You asked ;) - "Information removed". Did you know that I was against infoboxes because they are redundant? It's still on the talk of Samuel Barber. (Quote: "Gerda is, of course, absolutely right that an infobox doesn't contain any info that isn't already present in the article, but it isn't meant to: its purpose is to summarize the info in an "at a glance" way.") I learned in half a year what I repeated recently: some date in prose is not the same information as something declared as a date of birth, with distinct year/month/day. An arrangement of birth name/date/place and death date/place is helpful to readers searching for just one bit of that information, compared to having to look at various spots in a sometimes long lead. - Even if that was redundant - which it isn't for me: it isn't harmful. No? But potentially helpful even if not to you personally? Then why remove? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 17:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
If you can be spared from improving the next one, could you look at this peer review? Many thanks.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 15:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Just to make it a quicker job, which part of the guideline specifically covered that? I should probably read it all anyway but still... dannymusiceditor ~talk to me!~ 02:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello there Cassianto, I hope you're doing well. If you have a few minutes I have Mortara case up at FAC here. Any comments would be gratefully received. Cheers, — Cliftonian (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cass, Many thanks for your recent comments at the Siege of Sidney Street PR. I've now moved this on to FAC, should you have the time and inclination. Many thanks once again. – SchroCat ( talk) 16:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Greetings! Can Brian B. and I interest you in the peer review of GBS's article? All comments gratefully received if you have time and inclination. Tim riley talk 15:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Many many congratulations C for this. Usually the time zone I am in means that I miss all the fun so I am happy to be the first to say Well done. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 23:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dagenham Civic Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Precious again, your detailed constructive comments which helped to improve Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 to FA!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:58, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Reply for "No reason to hide rogue ip's. Or do you you have something to hide?" Meaning http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue, better put as independent otherwise its misrepresentation. Above that the word IP-hopper and even adding the IP I used by a certain editor Jim1138 shows rogue nature and it seems to be intended for Wikipedia:Harassment. Moreover that same editor seems to add IP's as it goes under the heading, when IP's are already shown. It would be more accurate if the editors attempts are read along with http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35787730 If such activities are validated for some certain sakes. This sort of anti-social attempts will continue to mask under policies and so on. 59.98.249.148 ( talk) 17:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Cassianto. You seem to have forgotten to add an edit summary for that revert? Just two questions immediately sprang to mind: 1. "Ann West, the mother of Lesley Ann Downey, was at the centre of a campaign to ensure that Hindley was never released from prison, and until West's death in February 1999, she regularly gave television and newspaper interviews whenever Hindley's release was rumoured." Do you think that sentence is adequately supported by the existing source? The ip edits seemed an improvement. 2. "Then Home Secretary David Waddington imposed a whole life tariff on Hindley in 1989, after she confessed to having been more involved in the murders than she had admitted." The source for that, again not a very good one, suggests it was 1990, as the ip had put. When was it? Not too sure why you reverted after only 16 minutes, with no explanation. Martinevans123 ( talk) 22:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld's next FAC of which I'm a co-nominator. Feel free to leave comments at the FAC page. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 02:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I've decided not to remove the star from my userpage in contrast to your polite request. If you wish to make a complaint against me, feel free to do so, if not, this matter is officially settled. Cheers, Jonas Vinther • ( Click here to collect your price!) 20:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
OK, I think enough has been said on this. Jonas, Bede did request a great deal of input over Cooper. I reviewed it extensively for GA and then a number of us further reviewed it before the FAC after my concern with it were met. I was honestly under the impression that it was largely a solo effort by Bede and I don't believe he co-nommed the article with anybody else. I don't remember seeing your name once during any of the reviews, I may be mistaken. It does look like you're claiming to have written the entire article when you didn't, though perhaps you made enough of the copyediting to add it to your user page with (some additions and copyedits) in brackets. Can you please do that and we can move on? If not then I can see other editors complaining about it in future. Ultimately it doesn't matter, we are a collaborative project, but a lot of work does go into promoting articles and if you didn't actually fully write an article and take an article to FAC but simply edited it then you should say so IMO.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Cassianto, the right way to make indented comments in numbered lists is to begin with a hash and follow with colons, like this:
giving:
When you just use colons, as you've been doing at the last two or three RfAs, you break the numbering. -- Stfg ( talk) 08:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Did you notice that I added two WP:RS to an article, and then two editors(including an Admin) blanked that section, because they didn't like what the RS actually said? Surely that is not proper Wikipedia procedure? Nicholas Griggs ( talk) 05:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The "I'm not an odious twat, I'm a true British gent" Award of Excellence | |
'Bout time you deserved a barnstar for your outstanding civility displayed towards Chillum and Rationalobserver of late, two editors whom the "Cult of Corbett" may raise eyebrows at. Here's to your health sir and for being one of the least odious chaps around here at the moment and telling it how it is. At least you're honest and know a real odious twat when you see one! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC) |
More to the point, I think you need this one:
Pony!
Congratulations! For creative use of very bad language and fierce defense of what is right and just, regardless of personal cost, you have received a
pony! Ponies are cute, intelligent, cuddly, friendly (most of the time, though with notable exceptions), promote good will, encourage patience, and enjoy carrots. Treat your pony with respect and he will be your faithful friend!
Montanabw
(talk)
21:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
To send a pony or a treat to other wonderful and responsible editors,
click here.
That had nothing to do with whether I liked it or not, I'm merley enforcing WP:POLEMIC . KoshVorlon 17:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hiya Cass, replying to this here. "lovely to see you back for another season" - haha well put, that's exactly what I do isn't it? Appear for a season and then go off again. I like to keep a low [as possible] profile these days which is why I'm not announcing a return or anything (plus I have no idea how long it will last, I'm sure I'll need a break again!) But yes, HELLO! Things are good with me, hope they are with you and the family too. -- Loeba (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
(and inclination, of course). Can I interest you in Streatham's leading non-Irish Irish composer, who is now at PR? All comments gladly received if you're disposed to look in. (Quite understand if you're not, naturally. I know how busy you are.) – Tim riley talk 18:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello there! I hope you're not busy as I would like to ask you for a favor. When/if you have some time, please have a look at Sonam Kapoor and see if you can give it a copy-edit. Thanks for your time and sorry for bothering you. -- Frankie talk 21:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Frankie talk 21:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
For now, It's time to go. Real life is pretty hectic for me at the moment; work is going completely mental and a family move is scheduled for the new year (albeit only 20 or so miles up the road). I'm sure all this shit will be here when I return, which I shall, at some point, but I'm certainly not in a hurry. Cassianto Talk 17:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I have blocked you for two weeks for violating out sockpuppetry policy to avoid scrutiny. Admins, this is a Checkuser block. Please contact me if you have any questions. -- Guerillero | Parlez Moi 17:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I was the one who oversighted the edits in question. -- Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
You have been unblocked per AGF that you edited logged out by mistake. IMO you had no reason to hide, as the edits weren't disruptive: compare the highly respected users protesting against the block above. @ Guerillero: The user has said the IP was his, so CU gives no special authority here. It's purely a question of whether or not to assume good faith. About oversighting the edits in question: you must have done that after I hid the IP, because at the time I did, it was all hanging out in the page histories. Bishonen | talk 20:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC).
I didn't want to needlessly embarrass you, but you've posted the wrong SPI. You can find the right one here. The one you posted concerned the possibility of additional sockpuppets, which is an entirely separate matter. Viriditas ( talk) 06:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
...seems to be unpopular...hopefully not because prose is boring :P ...can you take a layperson's look and let me know if unappealing? Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Kailash29792 has nominated the article for FAC. Feel free to leave comments at its FAC page. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
I know that I've disagreed with you in the past. If I've said anything that was offensive to you, I do apologize. I do truly and honestly appreciate all the hard work you do to provide good content to this project. I haven't said it before, so I say it now: Thank you. — Ched : ? 21:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
I've seen this coming. In November 2014, I advised & pleaded with Arbcom, to not ban anybody at the end of the GGTF case. My advice shouldn't have been overlooked. :( GoodDay ( talk) 22:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Suggest no longer interacting with Lynn or KG except in regards to RO's behaviour. No point in indulging their activism. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 11:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Glad you saw it; blink of an eye and you miss it these days. Giano (talk) 20:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Jesus loves you!
Elizium23 (
talk)
02:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Enough of
this behavior. Your comments are incendiary and baiting. Too combative, right now.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
18:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I wish you'd reconsider, Cassianto. GoodDay ( talk) 14:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Have a decent break completely away from the site and come back when you're ready to contribute again. We still remember your many fine contributions!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
The Resilient Barnstar | |
I hope this is only a temporary absence, and that you'll be back with us, hopefully early next year, all refreshed and ready to put together another superb article for us.
I'll miss your help and friendship while you're away and I'll float a couple of possible ideas your way in a couple of months to see if any of them can tempt you back. Pip pip! – SchroCat ( talk) 10:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC) |
Indeed, seconded. Hopefully we can look forward to further articles like Joseph Grimaldi at some point. Look after yourself amigo.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 16:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! | ||
A very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and all your loved ones, and a joyous and prosperous 2016.
|
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | ||
|
Indeed SchroCat. Cass, should you ever feel like returning I'd love to see you get David Garrick, a vital article, to FA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
I would welcome your input on a suggestion I've just made on their 'presumably' being lovers in the William Terriss article Talk section. Robocon1 ( talk) 11:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto, I just sent you an e-mail. :-) Greetings from German Wikipedia, -- Paulae ( talk) 18:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The tributes to David Bowie has lasted all day today on 24 Hours News and put everything else on hold (except the weather forecast) and well worth viewing. Sorry that you missed it. Dickie birdie ( talk) 19:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Future Perfect at Sunrise and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, -- QEDK ( T 📖 C) 11:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
but I'm afraid I've mentioned you here. Sorry. -- Dweller ( talk) 11:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Well, the article referred to the other film as his "last film", when it clearly wasn't; Sky Captain was, so I thought I'd mention it. No need to get upset and start making threats. DetroitWheels74 ( talk) 20:03, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Cassianto, We corresponded once about your valuable work on Marie Lloyd. It's a bit out of your line, but I think you know a lot of good people, and the article on Ethel M. Dell, George Orwell's bete noire, and Wodehouse's, could use strengthening. She was, according to Orwell, English womanhood's favorite novelist from 1911 to 1939, broadly popular, he was surprised to note, among all classes and types. Ruskin said, "Tell me what you like and I'll tell you who you are." She could tell us something about who those women were. If you happen to know anyone who does the English popular novel, would you pass this request along? Profhum ( talk) 01:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
...to see you back, mister. Kafka Liz ( talk) 20:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for your comments at the recent PR for Isabella Beeton. I have dropped the good lady into FAC for comments and thoughts. If you have time for any, I'd be delighted to hear with them. Cheers – SchroCat ( talk) 15:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You left me a message previously about Bowie (and me being a keyboard warrior). From the work you have done on the article you have greater knowledge of Bowie than myself, so I'm asking you to take a look at the new addition to Bowie's religion and spirituality. Does it accurately represent him? That first quote (if legit) about his belief in God seems conclusive. Thoughts? WisconsinPat. ( talk) 18:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for helping with that article. I really appreciate it. It is one of a number that came out of an editathon at Goldsmith's Uni where I trained several new editors, some with disabilities themselves, to make a start on editing Wikipedia. They have planned two more sessions and are looking for trainers (hint, if you're interested). I am also looking at ways that they can network and have regular editing sessions, so anybody in the London area (note for talk page stalkers) who would like to get involved with a very worthy endeavour could just drop a note on User talk:JTdisabilityartsonline or let Richard Neville know at the WMUK office. Cheers -- RexxS ( talk) 00:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Vandal! ;) SchroCat ( talk) 20:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
There are two motions proposed ( here and here) regarding an arbitration case request where you are a named party. For the arbitration committee, Liz Read! Talk! 13:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
My apologies for the problems I may had caused in welcoming new editors. I just wanted to welcome the new editors who signed up and provide them with information about the project. Thank you- RFD ( talk) 18:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Will take a look. I remember that fondly, though it came out later in the States. Kafka Liz ( talk) 16:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, not sure you remember me and how active you are these days but I would appreciate it if you make constructive criticism in my ongoing FAC. Thank you. -- Frankie talk 21:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Cassianto. James Murray (physician), an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 00:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC) |
Hello C. The good - The two one act plays by John Mortimer that featured Hordern have been released on DVD. The bad - I could not find where they are available in a region 2 release. I have the DVD and they are an enjoyable watch so maybe you will be able to find them streaming on the web somewhere if you are interested. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 23:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
On 7 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Murray (physician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irish doctor James Murray, who discovered what would become Milk of Magnesia, is an ancestor of the actor Michael Hordern? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Murray (physician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cass, I've been working on the Siege of Sidney Street recently, and I've just taken it to PR. If you have time, and if the topic is of interest, would you be able to take a look? Cheers – SchroCat ( talk) 22:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto. Can I ask for a review on Ride the Lightning, which I recently nominated for an FA? The nomination is here. All the best.-- Retrohead ( talk) 13:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
I honestly wasn't having a dig at you Cass (in US: "taking a shot at you")- if it reads like that, then I apologize. As far as continuing the discussion, I'm content either way. (continuing, or dropping it). — Ched : ? 02:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
With pleasure. Well done. Ceoil ( talk) 19:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
You asked ;) - "Information removed". Did you know that I was against infoboxes because they are redundant? It's still on the talk of Samuel Barber. (Quote: "Gerda is, of course, absolutely right that an infobox doesn't contain any info that isn't already present in the article, but it isn't meant to: its purpose is to summarize the info in an "at a glance" way.") I learned in half a year what I repeated recently: some date in prose is not the same information as something declared as a date of birth, with distinct year/month/day. An arrangement of birth name/date/place and death date/place is helpful to readers searching for just one bit of that information, compared to having to look at various spots in a sometimes long lead. - Even if that was redundant - which it isn't for me: it isn't harmful. No? But potentially helpful even if not to you personally? Then why remove? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 17:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
If you can be spared from improving the next one, could you look at this peer review? Many thanks.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 15:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Just to make it a quicker job, which part of the guideline specifically covered that? I should probably read it all anyway but still... dannymusiceditor ~talk to me!~ 02:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello there Cassianto, I hope you're doing well. If you have a few minutes I have Mortara case up at FAC here. Any comments would be gratefully received. Cheers, — Cliftonian (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cass, Many thanks for your recent comments at the Siege of Sidney Street PR. I've now moved this on to FAC, should you have the time and inclination. Many thanks once again. – SchroCat ( talk) 16:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Greetings! Can Brian B. and I interest you in the peer review of GBS's article? All comments gratefully received if you have time and inclination. Tim riley talk 15:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Many many congratulations C for this. Usually the time zone I am in means that I miss all the fun so I am happy to be the first to say Well done. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 23:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dagenham Civic Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Precious again, your detailed constructive comments which helped to improve Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 to FA!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:58, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Reply for "No reason to hide rogue ip's. Or do you you have something to hide?" Meaning http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue, better put as independent otherwise its misrepresentation. Above that the word IP-hopper and even adding the IP I used by a certain editor Jim1138 shows rogue nature and it seems to be intended for Wikipedia:Harassment. Moreover that same editor seems to add IP's as it goes under the heading, when IP's are already shown. It would be more accurate if the editors attempts are read along with http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35787730 If such activities are validated for some certain sakes. This sort of anti-social attempts will continue to mask under policies and so on. 59.98.249.148 ( talk) 17:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)