![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi, C.Fred - Not sure if you are in charge re burntout1234, but is there any chance that you (or somebody else) kindly release burntout1234 as the legitimate and fully disclosed doppelgänger of butntout123 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Burntout123)? If you are not in charge or if there is CoI, then kindly refer me to whoever is in charge. I left 2 similar messages for Joe and Crit I think. Thanks. -- -- S.Buntout123 ( talk) 20:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you dropped into Talk:A. Nesamony recently. I am struggling to get my point across to the major contributor, and it is perhaps not helped that I know a little of that person's history here. Some genuinely neutral guidance would, I think, be useful. I am trying to remain focussed and certainly have no vested interest in the subject matter, but I am beginning to query my own understanding of WP policies etc. This is one of those messy situations where a calm, uninvolved message might assist enormously.
I do recognise that since I first got involved there have been other sources introduced, which is A Good Thing & entirely down to the work of the major contributor because here at my end I have been able to find next to nothing. I have tried to acknowledge this but, perhaps, inadequately. I really do think that the subject is notable; the issue is more in relation to how it is depicted as such. Perhaps I am being pedantic? - Sitush ( talk) 00:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
by her record label and herself,so the facts remains. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinlovemusic ( talk • contribs) 09:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
I have recieved permission from the author of the sterling website that you have looked over to use this information in the Sterling Office Moving Wikipedia article. If need be you may contact them at [redacted].
Thank You
June 13th — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Chelmsford4 (
talk •
contribs)
16:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, why was my edit on Happy Feet Two reverted? I had sources provided with the information. Please reply on my talk page if you get a chance.-- BarrettM82 Contact 00:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Fred,
We do have original feedback with us, some of them have been posted on our website.
You can talk to any of our clients if your wish we would provide their contact details.
We are new to wikipedia and and wish to create our presence here since through wikipedia we can reach and help a large number of students.
All the information mentioned is original and we are accountable for it.
regards Nitesh Gawade (please don't post phone #s here. removed) Edify Labs — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDIFYLABS ( talk • contribs) 05:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Could you monitor the article, there is some disruptive IP again. Id appreciate if such IPs get blocked from the article per WP:BLP, it has stopped from being funny already a while ago. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 20:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
What were the reasons for contesting Mysto & Pizzi's page and retracting it from the wikipedia community? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarquetti ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Mysto & Pizzi should be recognized, and there are various evidence stating their accomplishments and career, even from the wikipedia community. This deletion should be retracted, here are some sources in regards to mysto & pizzi.
from wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special%3ASearch&search=mysto+pizzi
mysto & pizzi -w- geico -> http://www.geico.com/about/commercials/music/ mysto & pizzi -w- ultra records -> http://ultrarecords.com/artists/mysto--pizzi/# mysto & pizzi -w- youtube -> http://youtube.com/mystoandpizzi mysto & pizzi -w- itunes -> http://ax.search.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSearch.woa/wa/search?entity=song&media=all&page=1&restrict=true&startIndex=0&term=mysto+pizzi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarquetti ( talk • contribs) 23:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this Mysto & pizzi just recreated yet again a few minutes ago. It's not quite the same as the previously deleted version (although it's an utter mess). I 've gone through all the refs and there do appear to be claims of notability this time, so I'm erring on the side of caution rather than deleting it and I'm a quandry as to what to do. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 06:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred,
I have been attempting to sign on my user account for the last 10 minutes.
I've been using the right password and for some reason it's saying it's not valid; however, it is.
It might be possible that someone hacked my account recently and changed my password.
Can you please help me?
Thanks.
User:ATC
108.41.105.93 (
talk)
22:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, me again. I have just removed one of the two entries on the Kambar disambig page. Much as I enjoyed my time studying at Cambridge, the entry there for a nightclub type of thing had existed since April 2008 without an article being created. Or, if an article was created then it has been deleted.
So, we now have a single-entry disambig page and this is daft. I could redirect it but have the feeling that this might not be the correct course. Do you have any advice? Is it an XfD situation? - Sitush ( talk) 01:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
A week ago you contributed a brief note at Talk:A._Nesamony. There was some response, in a new section erroneously suggesting vandalism, on the following day. I dealt with that as best I could. There has been no further action on the talk page until the last few hours, at which point Kumaripriya continued the thread. I have just replied to that. If you have the time then I would appreciate you casting your eye over it. I am not asking you to get involved but if I have acted inappropriately in my response then please let me know & I will amend accordingly. Obviously, if you want to get involved on the page itself then that is no problem but my primary purpose here is really to have someone judge if I am communicating in a reasonable manner or if, for example, I am being bite-y.
As an aside, I am missing something obvious here. Why can I not link directly to the relevant TP section? There should be a TOC that enables me to do that. Does this feature have to be enabled on talk pages? - Sitush ( talk) 01:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
At your request, I've rewritten the page to be neutral. I'd appreciate your feedback in helping the page to stay on wikipedia. I am involved with the organization, but I would like to keep the article neutral. I'm also new user to Wikipedia and I've been studying up on what makes a page appropriate for the site. I do have a question about notability. We are a national program in hundreds of schools across the US. As far as references, I've included articles written about the company in the external links; what else would you like to see on the page? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkirktx ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Is "Krazysexy music" is sock of "Robinlovemusic"?
Similar editing and uncivil manner. Please see
Trina discography.—
Iknow23 (
talk)
02:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
I saw you speedy deleted the redirect from Problem Sleuth to MS Paint Adventures under WP:R3. As there's a redirect from Homestuck to MS Paint Adventures, I think it's notable enough to warrant the redirect be brought back. Zig ( talk) 00:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
If you think the image was the same, then go to commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spread-Of-The-Black-Death.gif. You'll see it also spreads in Asia too. Then look where it says, "File:Spread-Of-The-Black-Death.gif". I could be right or wrong. If you disagree, then someone might have uploaded the file from Google Images or any other source of images.
Eric567 ( talk) 14:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Well, when I looked at it, I could have made a typing error. Follow these steps below. This might solve it.
1. Go to "The Black Death" on Wikimedia Commons
2. The first image on the top is the image I am talking about.
Eric567 ( talk) 08:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you or someone that can take care of my request just delete my page? I thought genealogy is something you can learn from, but apparently not. So, please delete it because I tried to look for that option, but couldn't find it. NeilsErikson ( talk) 18:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
i don't why you changing the right information i put that came from billboard magazine,the link was provided.
lil kim - hard core 1,400,000
eve first album - 2,000,000 74.176.66.36 ( talk) 20:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Will you check that for sources and stuff? Special:Contributions/67.185.251.75 ( User talk:67.185.251.75)
The I.P that got recently blocked seems to be back under the 31 hours. He seems to have a registered account and continues to do the same vandalism to my articles. Can you please block him again? I also think he is now acting as a sockpuppet since he is using his IP to prevent getting his registered user blocked. He also seems to the the author of the fan article Total Drama Destination. Giggett ( talk) 20:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The socking seems to be continuing (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Backlook). Semi-protection may be necessary if possible. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles ( pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.
To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie ( talk) 22:25, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
I would like to thank you for taking care of User:Dantherocker1 last February by revoking his talk page access while indef blocked. He has been bothering me on YouTube lately and admitted that he has been on Wikipedia before. Due to harassing me on YouTube and the fact that he was on Wikipedia, it has come to my attention that if he wasn't blocked, he would be vandalizing my userpage. NHRHS2010 the student pilot ✈ 15:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for your interest in the Morley Academy entry. We have tried to improve its accuracy by linking to well recognised information on our website. The previous section on Headteacher controversy was fairly malicious and had no reference other than to anonymous posts in a discussion thread. Not very credible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSATPolicy ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring the Jack Hoban page. Mtpublicaffairs ( talk) 20:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I already added an example of how the episodes should look like in the main total drama article. But the biggest and most controversial change that needs to happen is removing the elimination table as it makes the articles incredibly in-universe. So i was wondering if we can decide that. Bread Ninja ( talk) 20:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, possible request. Is it possible to develop an article Corbin Bleu and become a good article See the article Arabic Wikipedia good article, can you?-- 77.31.36.7 ( talk) 15:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Look at this version will help you to become a good article look-- 77.31.36.7 ( talk) 15:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm wondering if this comment should be deleted. It's an attempt (albeit circuitous) to out the editor who made the preceding comment. Voceditenore ( talk) 15:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
trina red bottoms number 100 on the r&b/hip-hop chart,and i don't see why you keep reverting the page.
http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/trina/252957
98.88.209.190 ( talk) 04:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes I have new information about trina,and i would love for you to add it.
http://hiphopwired.com/2011/07/14/trina-joins-%E2%80%9Cno-h8%E2%80%9D-campaign-photos/
http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/94340/ 74.190.22.214 ( talk) 20:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Adam (AJ) Devine, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Thou shalt not tag for A3 within minutes of creation. . Thank you. Danger ( talk) 05:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Bampublore is Vermapriya1986 all over again. Same odd typos in punctuation, same signature style, same whining, same articles, same sources, same attack mode. The SPI has been open for a while but Tnxman said the old a/cs are stale. S/he has thrown several unnecessary 3RR warnings at my page in the last hour, although I removed them. - Sitush ( talk) 20:49, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
hey C.Fred i was just wondering why you took my Shake It Up cast list off. I know you think it is to similar to Shake It Up (TV series) but I thought it was a cool idea because then someone who was wondering what the cast was or someones name or something they could just go there. And thanks for reminding me to sign my talk page posts.
sorry to bother, -- Sami0829 ( talk) 23:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm having trouble with certain edits in articles 'PPACA' and 'Health Insurance Mandate' by a user (TVC 15) that you appear to have deleted. He is blatantly non-NPOV but keeps reverting to his old text despite this (seemingly on the justification that simply if he has news links to it he can't be expressing PoV/non-NPOV. This seems to be vanadalism in favor of his PoV; but if he is deleted, how can he still do this? Help? Thanks 24/07/11 - from user: still needs to sign up to an account (will do so eventually, but only just started editting - I follow policy and the health care policy edits that TVC is vandalising are a problem to me, and I think any sincere wikipedian). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.188.221.123 ( talk) 21:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Hiyah, thanks for your help on my page, Im clearly new to this. I have seen some pages that dont have much info on the actors but the page has still been able to stay up. Hopefully this will stay. Again thanks for the help x ( Lola-razz ( talk) 20:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC))
Hi C. - yep, understood, point taken - -- Shirt58 ( talk) 16:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Can you bring that up on ANI? That was clearly retaliatory, and I've got a thread open there already on Yoseph in an attempt to get him on the right track. MSJapan ( talk) 01:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Response to MP Those notability and others were not retaliatory and you failed you let them go through the process of allowing other editors to check them for their merit. Your actions were arbitrary, assuming, and game playing. I looked at every person in that catagory for persons known for their contribution to Freemasonry and marked the ones that needed help and the ones that were canditates for deletion based upon the Wiki Rules for notability. You had no right not to allow them through the process.-- Yosesphdaviyd ( talk) 05:04, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Response to Fred - Even though the community rules are clear on that part, I could have sworn the tags said don't remove until the issue has been resolved. So guess one person can resolve it. Thanks. But a number of those articles clearly need help and he didn't even improve them before he removed the tag. He's a wikibully. :) -- Yosesphdaviyd ( talk) 06:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Moreover, wasn't there suppose to be a Deletion Discussion? No, he's a wikibully and a harrasser. I feel it. -- Yosesphdaviyd ( talk) 06:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
SwisterTwister has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Have a cookie as a friendly greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
I just requested a new name. Thx for letting me know, I hadn't thought of that. NZparliament ( talk) 18:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry I changed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futbol vic ( talk • contribs) 05:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm Ralph's grandson. My mom (his elder daughter, Ellen Berkowitz Carlin) told me the news two hours ago. No obits have been published yet (I don't think), but I imagine the Albuqurque, NM newspaper will run something tomorrow.
thanks, Peter Ames Carlin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteramescarlin ( talk • contribs) 00:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, but it was not a simple 'disagreement about an article'. Please read this. Moriori deleted all the links I added instead of only the one problem link (which I believe was caused by the Parliament site being in flux at that point due to Carter's resignation, as cut and paste is usually straightforward). He made no attempt to simply fix the error. He made no attempt to contact me so I could fix the error. He then implied he did NOT delete everything, when he should have at least apologized for that error. He blamed me for everything, and in an insulting, condescending, arrogant way. Finally, he selectively edited our disagreement on his Talk page to make himself appear to be in the right. As a supposedly experienced Administrator (I note he started editing in 2003), all that is very wrong. I refuse to waste my time with a project which puts destructive people in leadership positions. If those are the sort of people you want to be in charge, then you need to look for contributors far different from me. I suggest you try the local playground. Kiwigov ( talk) 15:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
At User talk:Kiwigov you said -- "And for the record, I support your edit to the John Carter (New Zealand) article; the link looks fine to me." Which link do you mean? Moriori ( talk) 21:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
TRLIJC18 ( talk) 04:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
Those can all be blocked as socks. We had this problem about a year ago, I don't remember the checkuser name exactly but I can try to find it if you want. -- Rs chen 7754 04:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred, I added more information of File:St. Anne's Church.jpg. I Originally took the photo in the 1950's, when I was younger, and made it into a drawing on Paint.net a cuple days ago. From there I added words to make it look more authentic, as if it was a postcard from the 50's. I hope this helped. -- Kenlukus ( talk) 02:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kenlukus (
talk •
contribs)
02:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying me about that edit. The Mark of the Beast ( talk) 01:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
How do I change my birthdate to the correct date or 10/05/1982 instead of the written 10/05/1981 without having it reverted back to the wrong date? IsaiahEk ( talk) 02:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Image copyright violations by User:Kenlukus. Thank you. ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/ CN 06:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
I only disagree with the term cult leader as Meher Baba never declared, himself to be a cult leader in any publication. ( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
in his interviews to charles purdom / meredith starr - Meher baba (see meher baba references) declared himself that he is Non dogmatic and his mission to west is not to establish any Cult or religion - He never classified himself as a cult leader
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:27, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
Sociologists can make several claims based on their personal research - That doeant mean u classify him as cult leader ( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
Info about Meher baba whethe he is a cult leader or not is not required in Don E Stevens article.
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
I note your comments above about including content from independent reliable sources. Many of the cited additions I have made regarding Baba have been reverted by other editors. I'm going to step away from the articles for now, as it is clear there are some editors who are quite passionate about defending them, and it is not a good use of energy on my part to engage if other editors are just reverting without discussing the merits of bringing an alternative view. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 19:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
As an avid fan of the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets, an extremely involved campus contributor, and a caretaker for the Ramblin' Reck, you are wrong in MANY areas of the "Ramblin' Wreck" article. You obviously are not a true fan of Georgia Tech as you do not know the proper name of our mascot. The Ramblin' Reck is properly spelled with an "R" and not a "W". I don't know where you got your information, but it is wrong. The media and Athletic Association have been wrong for a while in their spelling, but the true history is correct and credible. The original archives of the Georgia Institute of Technology mention the "Ramblin' Reck".
I was only changing your article for the misspelled name of the beloved name of my most cherished school. I'm glad that for at least an hour, the Wikipedia article was correct in its spelling. You can undo changes from true, knowledgeable Georgia Tech fans, but you will never be correct. Your sources and reasonings will always be flawed if you continue misname the Ramblin' Reck. You are incredibly disrespectful, and I was only trying to correct your article as many Wikipedia users do on a regular basis.
Before you try to oppress Wikipedia users and undermine the free speech of Wikipedia, you should get your facts straight. People are only trying to help before more people are misinformed about the topics of your articles.
Embaker823 ( talk) 17:27, 10 August 2011 (UTC) THE RAMBLIN' RECK
HIII
Glad to speak to you again. Actually, The indications I gave about the Cult leader statement in Meher Baba's article is apparently vandalism, as you could notice.
The sources the user indicated may be reliable but the interpretation of those sources form the user may not be true. This is what I tried to explain it to the other editor.
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 13:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)).
== Okay ==
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 14:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)).
Hi
An IP has today edited User:Kumaripriya with this.
In itself, no big deal - the edit is merely formatting etc and it is safe to assume that this is the registered user doing things while logged out.
However, also today, a fairly dormant account has edited an article on which Kumaripriya was warring & that has had no action for a while - see here. The images are already tagged by Fut. Perf but could this possibly be a sock? It seems to be quite a coincidence, especially since Kumaripriya has a history of working in Christianity-based articles and the alternate account has also made these edits. - Sitush ( talk) 23:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I tried to follow link but was told in edit mode that this is not the place to post requests, where is the right place? Thank you 04:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Could you also block User:Textenwikisearcher? I would also like to know whether these edits: [4] & [5] could be hid (so that their edit summaries are not shown in history). Thanks again! -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 21:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, C.Fred … You did a WP:CSD of J.C. Moreau ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) which has been recreated by the subject and author, Jcmoreau ( talk · contribs) … perhaps they need a stronger warning, and perhaps WP:SALT the article? Happy Editing! — 70.21.24.28 ( talk · contribs) 17:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
You may wish to comment at Template talk:UK year nav. Moonraker ( talk) 03:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
If I took a picture of Resop with my cell phone from the TV would that be alright? Thanks for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustangrrf ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello - I was made aware of your deletion of the Mary Ellen Mazey wikipedia page. I am in the Office of Marketing and Communications at BGSU - the owner of the page where the biographical information was taken. This is not a copyright violation - I was instructed to create the page by the University. I would like to see the page reinstated in full.
Please contact me with any further questions.
Jennifer Sobolewski Office of Marketing and Communications Bowling Green State University [redacted]@bgsu.edu
Jsobole ( talk) 20:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I found thru searching in Wikipedia that you deal with article merge issues. On 19 August I attempted to move an article I created in my workspace named User:Wpollard/NBRC. The title was to be National Board for Respiratory Care. I was unable to do this and was uncertain as to why. One possibility was an article by that name had just been created, so I looked for it. I did not find it and moved my article to NBRC, reasoning that I could look into this matter more fully later.
When I looked into this, I found someone had created such an article, although it contained much less info than the one I created. I created a discussion page in NBRC proposing the two articles be merged.
Someone merged them, but lost the unique info in the article I created. I could manually put the info back, as I printed a copy once my article was finished. I make hard copies of some new articles, because I have run into a somewhat similar situation before. Is there a way to retreive the info from the NBRC article, thus making it easier to truly merge the two articles?
Thanks for your time. Bill Pollard ( talk) 22:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
vedette is the latin(spanish) version of showgirl which are stage female performers that act,sing or dance. You can also know what they are by searching for eather vedette or showgirl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santiagokdasilva1 ( talk • contribs) 00:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Disruptive single-purpose account who is again on his monthly campaign against the article. Could you block him? Just to make sure he understands WP is not a place where you can continuously get away with this. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 20:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Disruptive single-purpose account who is again on his monthly campaign against the article. Could you block him? Just to make sure he understands WP is not a place where you can continuously get away with this. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 20:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
I seem to have attracted even more attention than is usual. It would not surprise me if this is another off-wiki concert party. Thanks for your help so far. - Sitush ( talk) 06:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Since you just blocked Truefact1979 for crossing 3RR after warning on Yadav, could you do the same for User:Nishukumar on James Tod; it's pretty clear (you issued the 3RR warning), and would save me having to fill out the whole 3RRNB report. Thanks. Qwyrxian ( talk) 06:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
On WP:ANI, you asked if there was a way to mass delete pages. Did you know about Special:Nuke? It it exactly what you were looking for. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 08:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
This database is crucial for anyone researching Australian theatre history - it's got records of performances by Peter Finch, etc - like an IMDB for Australian theatre. I've done a bunch of entries on Australian actors, writers and directors for wikipedia and always use it. Dutchy85 ( talk) 06:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
C.Fed, I don't know why it's not turning up for you - maybe it's because information about Australia's theatre history is so unrepresented on the web. (Something Ausstage is trying to fix up) It also might be because researches use Ausstage as a database to access primary sources of information - you look up, say, Peter Finch and get the dates of performances he's been in, then access newspapers from those dates to get reviews, etc. This is what I've done when I've used it for academic articles I've written on Frank Harvey and Alec Coppel. If you google "ausstage" you will see it has quite a presence eg http://www.adsa.edu.au/news/call-for-proposals-ausstage-symposium, http://www.nla.gov.au/pub/gateways/archive/57/p07a01.html. The reason I gave it it's own page was I was constantly using Ausstage as an external link for biographical entries, same as IMDB or IBDB and felt it deserved a page to explain to anyone who was looking to click on it what they were getting. It's a terrific resource for theatre historians and ask that wikipedia allow it to stay up there. Thanks Dutchy85 ( talk) 06:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I notice that you have warned this editor about edit warring, some of his edits since then (esp. this one) would indicate a bit of time in the cooler might help him. Mt king (edits) 05:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
C.Fred, So if someone outside my company posted the same thing it would be okay because it is coming from an independent source? In relation to encouraging deletion of a competitor posting I request that purely because it is now untrue. I wouldn't care if you have 1000 independent consultants in that section as long as they are truly independent and Newfield IT (who I personally have nothing against) are not independent, they are clearly owned by Xerox so that should be the end of the discussion on that and they should be moved or deleted if your real interest is accuracy and honest representation. I should note that I only copied the format that Newfield IT, Print Operations Group etc. used so if mine was so wrong then they must be too? First it was that I was trying to advertise Fulton Francis which was not the case because I followed same format as everyone else and did not make any statements about our market position or capabilities, then it was adding inappropriate external links which again was the same as everyone else and now it is the conflict of interest...I'm confused: Getting back to the question, have we overcome the first two issues and is it now a matter of having this uploaded by someone independent of Fulton Francis? Bfrancis73 ( talk) 21:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the "junior" college on the Rose State College page. I've been invited to upload the correct logo, however, I have no link through which to upload it. Can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rose State College ( talk • contribs) 21:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
This is your pro forma notification of a thread involving you, and also including you, since you're too fast for me. Drmies ( talk) 03:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Goodafternoon I am receiving emails from you saying I can not edit my page.. I am Sal Abbatiello and all the edits I am making are about me.. My User name on here is fevermusic... P Lease let me know how I can edit MY OWN PERSONAL info and how to stop you from changing it back— Preceding unsigned comment added by fevermusic ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I am writing to inquire after the deletion of the article "The National Theatre of the World." This deletion was, apparently, established on the basis "G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.thenationaltheatreoftheworld.com/The_World.html." I interpret this to mean that the inclusion of the URL here specified infringed upon Wikipedia guidelines. I apologize if this indeed is the situation and am willing to remove any flagged material/urls in conflict. Montroseworld78 ( talk) 18:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi C. Fred,
I've completely reworked the Farmhouse Foods page and simply given basic information about the brand. I understand now what the problem was with the previous post.
( Foodman11 ( talk) 23:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)).
Hi, C.Fred. Heyjudejang and Osakafreid you blocked are sockpuppet of User:Philip126. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philip126. Thank you. ―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 11:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on User_talk:Pierceybrian23. I cannot tell if this guy is just being arrogant or plain ignorant. He did this previously as User:Pierceybrian22 as well under numerous IPs. It's not blantant vandalism, but now that he is ignoring warnings and bordering 3RR, maybe he'll learn something. But I've said that before. -- Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ( talk) 23:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Is it normal to permutate redirects of articles to quite the extent that was done here between 17:14 & 17:21 today? The contributor has done this sort of thing a few times, IIRC, but it seems a little extreme to me. - Sitush ( talk) 20:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I wonder if you would be interested in helping me with my research on Wikipedia. I am writing a dissertation on Wikipedia as part of my undergraduate course at the University of Cambridge. What I am asking is for you to complete a questionnaire with a number of general, subjective questions about your experiences working on Wikipedia, for example concerning Wikipedia's culture, your motivation in participating and so on. It should take 10-20 minutes. Participants will be anonymous if requested. More information is available if you are interested. Thanks! I really appreciate any time you can give! Thedarkfourth ( talk) 07:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
why do you keep deleting the ROBC page? — Preceding chuch8736 comment added by Chuch8736 ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE HELP ME EDIT THE PAGE FOR J M!!!! (iamawesome100) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamawesome100 ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Thank you!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamawesome100 ( talk • contribs) 03:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Is there any chance that you could take a look at the contributions of User:Kunwaryogendrasinghlodhikheriyarafatpur to Lodhi, since you reverted some edits fairly recently. Thanks. - Sitush ( talk) 06:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey C.Fred. I notice you've been processing some speedies. I am looking at History of Animal Rights, an article that has existed since early July. It duplicates the history part of Animal rights, a much longer and more mature article. i.e. it's the same topic. There exists a speedy tag which seems to address this, Wikipedia:CSD#A10, for a 'Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic', a tag which I've never used. The creator of History of Animal Rights, User:Mozzyepic24 is not around to be consulted, since he is indefinitely blocked as a sock. The article has no substantive contributions besides those of the creator. I don't notice any interesting material in the article that's worth preserving. Is this an A10 candidate? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 05:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the intervention, just saw it . Have no idea who that is. I'll look through it in the morning and see if anything looks familiar. Again thanx.
Mlpearc If you reply here, please leave a {{
Talkback}} on
my talk.
05:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Why has this page been deleted, I was told to give a reason why it was important but two people thought it would be funny to vandalise my page (you can check if you want)then Wikipedia hadn't taken the original page on the history so I had to write it all out again! Then as soon as I finished you had removed it for not changing what I had been told to so well thats hours of my life wasted thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stotto1119 ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Better now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawarene ( talk • contribs) 15:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
9/21/11 The edit to Naturopathy is better, though it ends on a note that is untrue. There have been many research studies indicating the efficacy of Naturopathic medicine. I will edit the page again at a later time with links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitton14 ( talk • contribs) 05:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
My band has released a song, has a Facebook page, has played atleast 80 shows, and gets paid. I published the page to show my other member the link so he could say if it was official so I could add the links to the page and videos. It does have significance too since nearly 2000 people would wanna read the article. Restore it dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LondonBell ( talk • contribs) 05:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred,
Please delete the David Herskovitz post. The name is misspelled, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
C. Fred the last name should end in a Z not S. Can you please amend this or instruct me of how to do so?
Thank you
Sources for Correction of Spelling. In addition to ending in a Z, there should also be an 'H' before the letter K.
In the New York Times article Second Paragraph The spelling is -
'If Kim Hastreiter is most familiar as one of the two editors of Paper (the other is David Hershkovitz)' http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/08/fashion/08Gimlet.html?pagewanted=all
Another NY Times Article Spells the Last name as Hershkovitz, Eleven Lines you can find the correct spelling. "With the encouragement of the magazine’s other founder, David Hershkovits, she agreed. “The idea of influencers is like C.E.O. magazine,” Ms. Hastreiter said. “If you have 100 C.E.O.s read your magazine, it’s valuable. Small is big.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/fashion/extra-extra-papers-event-planning-affiliate-ny-fashion-week.html?ref=fashion
Also, the books he published are spelled David Hershkovits http://books.google.com/books?id=Srt_GwAACAAJ&dq=david+hershkovits&hl=en&ei=yUF7TpaTOsjl0QH2gvC5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
C.Fred Can this page please edited correctly ASAP. With the correct spelling as Hershkovitz Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
C. Fred,
The name should be spelled as Hershkovitz. The sources I provided spell the name as Hershkovitz, not Hershkovits, please can you amend this soon. Other spellings are incorrect, as my previous sources show.
Thank you, Ncacia ( talk) 14:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
My mistake, Thank you C. FRed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I have edited out what seems to be the conflict of interest issues,may you please review as i would like to at least put it up so others may help... Thank you C.Fred for all of your help! URL is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Michaelparks/Bert_Oliva -- Michaelparks ( talk) 17:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Okay then question, someone from the old article posted pictures from different newspapers and magazines(now I'm glad i copied everything from the original article). I was wondering if I can use those? Newspapers like the Miami Herald and business magazines are all reliable sources, so i went to each link that was posted and downloaded each picture... what can i do with this? How do i show this as evidence? Also one wikipedia mediator or something a said that it would be okay if i just had the name of the media(Miami Herlad/Biz Bash/etc.) and date that that would be an exception to not having the actual article accessible on the internet. Also! I checked out some of his videos and you can see him on NBC, CBS, CNN and other big names. I understand if someone just told me this stuff but i saw in the videos facts that he has been on these shows and tv channels. Basically i have 2 mediums of facts that I'm not sure how to get them right for you to exept them, but there are existent and van be found! :) Thanks for all the help! -- Michaelparks ( talk) 18:04, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
I added spam to the reason for deletion and deleted it. There's been some spamming at the magazine's page, and this looked to me to be a continuation of it undercover. Peridon ( talk) 20:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I had created an artile under Bioteknika. It was deleted. Is there any updates that are required?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuber.ksp ( talk • contribs) 06:06, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, If you deleted my article, could you please remove it completely, I do not won it like this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Shapira on the Google search Thank you VERY VERY much Regards Svetlana Ivanova. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.215.223 ( talk) 12:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you for removing the obnoxious racist edits to the Holly Springs page! Allthingstoallpeople ( talk) 03:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
I accidentally reverted your edit. Your change was promptly adopted. Thank you. -- Fayerman ( talk) 05:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Although obviously this unsourced article would not stand as it is , it clearly asserted importance. Please restore, and perhaps there will be sources available, though even then it might not pass AfD. (I know I have the ability to do so myself, but I want to ask you first.) Incidentally, the ed. who placed the tag has placed a good many incorrect speedies, as judged by a number of admins, and I'd suggest checking his tagging quite carefully DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Fred, Prior to making 'undos' it is requested that you visit the polarized, biased information formerly on this article and question your ethics as a CPA if the article was not, in fact, biased before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pharmameatsdorkies ( talk • contribs) 02:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Their wedding was verified by Associated Press, that was the "AP" reports. Just google it and you will see. Their people verified as India Times and others were just putting something to sell papers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamajoe777 ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
[Copy of warning I left on IP's page removed.]
Why should I be blocked for Adding Information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drugsarebad89 ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Why do people keep reverting information i add what is the problem with what I put. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drugsarebad89 ( talk • contribs) 01:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to post facts on wikipedia I have no Idea why people would be reverting everything I post — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drugsarebad89 ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Fred. the editor is just playing a game, and has consistently done the same type of things over and over. I don't know exactly how far this vandal goes, but I can see the sequence of edits that have lead us to this particular point. The Billy Jean article(from Hungryforfun9000 1, 2, 3, 4)(from blocked Masterknowledgelol 1) from anon ip 96.246.254.161 1, 2, 3 plus about 4 more of the same edits) and then Drugsarebad89 makes the same edits to the article 1 and then moves to other articles playing the same games and has already been blocked twice with this account. This needs Admin action and a CU over at SPI. I'll do it, but I don't have the time right now. Evidently, per edit summaries, the user has had interactions with the Admin Tide Rolls too. It's all in the contribution history and edit summaries. Thanks. Dave Dial ( talk) 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fred,
I will add more information on the Society soon. The Society's work is notable and worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia because the various other projects/pages it is connected to (Studies in Medievalism, Medievally Speaking, etc.) all happen under the umbrella of the organization. If it is the list of names that is problematic, I can certainly take those off and simply put a link to the Society pages soon to go up on the Studies in Medievalism website. Thanks for any help you can give me. Best, r — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utziputz ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Sure, Fred, go ahead and delete it. I don't have all the materials on the society's history at hand to make appropriate changes. It's existed since the 1980s, with members far and wide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utziputz ( talk • contribs) 15:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you for the help you gave my students working on the Weardrobe page - all of the class members, including me, their instructor, are newbies in the Wikipedia world. Efforts like yours are what makes Wikipedia a welcoming community where we can delve in and learn more about the backstage working of it. Thanks! LeshedInstructor ( talk) 14:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of that Rat Pack page! (I'm a newbie here) Skweezy ( talk) 01:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Show me one part of the paragraphed that I typed that didn't "improve" the article. My scriptures that I supported there support the post tribulation viewpoint. Last time I checked the discussion page, people were doing the same thing as I was doing. Putting scriptures to support THEIR VIEWPOINT.
If my statement didn't improve the article, i'm about to erase the whole discussion board.
You trying to censor what i'm saying cause you don't agree with it? That's not going to happen.
Please, stay the heck away from my post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HolyandClean ( talk • contribs) 01:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
The second revision was on a {{for}} hatnote template, which contains no such restriction. See Wikipedia:Hatnote#"For …, see …". Please feel free to weigh in at Talk:Goat Island, Trinidad and Tobago or Wikipedia:RM. Jokestress ( talk) 04:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
[Deleted article "Guitar Resonator"]
Unfortunately I missed the prior discussion about deleting this page. Discussion is closed and I'm wondering how it could be re-initiated. The article "Guitar Resonator" has been translated from de.wikipedia. As a long time guitar player I know most of the international publications in this field. International references show definitely a relevance in this group of guitar effects. The discussion showed some errors to me but I don't know how to re-initiate. What procedure do you recommend ? Xstring ( talk) 09:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, hope everything is well! I need your help; the page i helped create: "Bert Oliva" was deleted because they said it was a recreation of an older version. I worked with other people including yourself on creating new material, verbiage and references. How can I get this turned around? I think this wasn't a valid deletion.
Thank you very much for your time and help! -- Michaelparks ( talk) 17:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Ubuntu (operating system): you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
14:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
"Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Seattle SuperSonics, you may be blocked from editing. This appears to be the third account you've used today to vandalize the article. You may not abuse multiple accounts in this manner. —C.Fred (talk) 22:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)"
I apologize. I wasn't trying to vandalize the article. I simply didn't like the wording at the top of the page. Please explain to me how my edit can be considered disruptive, let alone vandalism? I promise you that this is my only account. Furthermore, let me explain to you why I edited the article, and how I did so without any intent of vandalism:
You see, I recently watched Sonicsgate, so I decided to look at the Sonics wiki page. When I read "This article is about the defunct Seattle basketball team. For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder." and then noticed that that part of the article changed when I refreshed the page a few minutes later, I decided to look at the page's edit history. And when I also noticed that that section of the article had been edited by several people, multiple times in the past couple of hours, I thought I should create an account, and try to make the friendliest edit possible, according to which statement I agreed with most at the top of the page. Thus, I changed "This article is about the defunct Seattle basketball team. For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder." to "This article is about the beloved Seattle basketball team, regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city."
Instead of defunct, I thought it should be noted how beloved the team was. I realize that this is the same word used in previous edits today, but it was just something I appreciated, and therefore wanted to keep in my edit. And then I added "regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city," in place of "For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder" because I feel it is disrespectful to call the Thunder the Sonics' reincarnation; especially after the way the Sonics were relocated to Oklahoma City.
So if these changes are considered vandalism, then once again I apologize, and I guess Wikipedia is not the place for me.
Thank you for your time, and sorry for any inconvenience.
P.S. Because of this experience, I will no longer make edits on Wikipedia. But if you are kind enough to take into account my point of view, I humbly ask that you make an edit that uses kinder words in the Seattle SuperSonics page than "defunct" and "incarnation" — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlfredoMontoya ( talk • contribs) 23:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I agree that those other two accounts look connected, but I promise you that my account is independent from those two. Therefore, can you explain to me why my edit was considered vandalism? I made such edit in good faith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlfredoMontoya ( talk • contribs) 23:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I thought I explained my edit to the introduction as such: Instead of defunct, I thought it should be noted how beloved the team was. I realize that this is the same word used in previous edits today, but it was just something I appreciated, and therefore wanted to keep in my edit. And then I added "regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city," in place of "For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder" because I feel it is disrespectful to call the Thunder the Sonics' reincarnation; especially after the way the Sonics were relocated to Oklahoma City.
I mistakenly undid your edit instead of just making the edit I made anyway, first. But I still don't appreciate you saying that I vandalized the page. I don't know what else I can do to prove to you that I'm not connected to Mistah Perfekshun nor DerpDderp, besides the assurances that I have already given. Yet that doesn't seem to be enough.
And I've already apologized for the similarities between my edit and the edits of the two aforementioned accounts , but you still refuse to explain to me why the edit I made was vandalism. What is so disruptive about me editing the introduction to the Seattle SuperSonics page, to state that "This article is about the beloved Seattle basketball team, regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlfredoMontoya ( talk • contribs) 23:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Orangemike for the simple, straightforward explanation. I hereby apologize for my biased statement. But your explanation is also hypocritical, because how is calling the Thunder the "incarnation" of the Seattle SuperSonics, NOT biased or opinionated???
Whatever, I've wasted enough time on this topic. I guess being a life-long Sonics fan is not nearly enough to qualify me to edit a page about the Seattle SuperSonics, but having degrees from North Carolina State Univerisity is... Once again, thank you Orangemike for the simple, straightforward explanation. But most of all, thank you to the self-righteous prick, C.Fred, for ruining my Wikipedia experience. AlfredoMontoya ( talk) 01:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Hellow, regarding to the Article GPM Antivirus, can the developers/other editors edit the content of this article just only to remove the issues. I am not advertising or any other violations. and to stop deleting this article. I am gonna let the developers/other editors to edit the contents of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gian20 ( talk • contribs) 14:05, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Time to disable talk page access for this user? Clearly not getting with the program, and now with a large dump of copyvio. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
You give the very good response, which is civil response. I stating to JetBlast to follow your role models example. Thanks. -- B767-500 ( talk) 05:12, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
I've been having some difficulties with User:65.88.88.202, who is apparently contributing via a library/hotspot in New York. It took me a while to catch on to the fact that it is a static address but I did try to advise them a few hours ago.
Subsequent to that they yet again pushed exactly the same POV as they had previously been pushing on Kashmiri Pandit. The article is very poor (although I've actually increased the number of RS etc in it) but there is no need to replace one reasonable but unsourced statement with another that is both unsourced and unreasonable. Furthermore, they keep meddling with the mention of "Mongol", which was discussed on the article talk page here.
What should I do next? The idea of reporting this to WP:3RRNB for edit warring is a bit awkward if that IP address really is used by the location stated on the IP talk page. We could end up briefly blocking contributions from a major library, albeit at present the sole contributor from the address is clearly a the same person (edits are confined to Kashmiri subjects). - Sitush ( talk) 00:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
They've done it again, so I have reported at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:65.88.88.202_reported_by_User:Sitush_.28Result:_.29. This thread and your name are mentioned. - Sitush ( talk) 00:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Dear Sir:
I am willing to learn to share words that are listed as DICTIONARY terms. I am also willing to learn to share TALK pages.
Therefore, I request you unblock me and share the words which are now words in etymology.
Those that I share in cosmology which you believe on TALK pages are rambling are important to many of us who are creators, authors, science fiction writers, script writers, special effects creators, editors, publishers, and webhosts.
Please refer to all the articles, pages, photos, and references made with the words which I have requested to be included such as the Alphaverse and Omegaverse.
I have a strong suggestion that those who are of the interest in making Wikipedia the free encyclopedia that is the best in the world shall agree that it is best to include all words and not just those chosen by yourself.
It would be best if one who deletes information know that it is better to take one's creative words and (Ramblings) as you define them and create them into more of what one of your stature in life expects.
This is a formal humanitarian apology to one named C. Fred who has seen fit to delete me and block me. One having such POWER on EARTH must also define opulent control.
Those of us who are desiring to include words in our genre in social networking and futurists creations such as cosmology would appreciate your contributions to our cause in etymology on the free wikipedia.
Please know that much of what I read on Wikipedia appears as explanation in TALK form and articles.
Thank you for assisting me as a new contributor. Your help would be most appreciated in the editing the words and fields instead of simply deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.170.25 ( talk) 02:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Do you think that Kulin Brahmin and Kulin Brahmins can be merged boldly? Neither are great articles but they are also not duplicated content, just both about the same subject. The singular form is more commonly used for India caste articles, so Kulin Brahmin would contain the content.
I am almost tempted to cut them back to a short single para due to the poor sourcing, but one does have a few listed if they are not cited inline. - Sitush ( talk) 20:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Volume 4, Issue 3 • Fall 2011 • About the Newsletter | |||||
|
|
Project reports for
| |||
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Hello C Fred, I see you have both commented on the records for cue cat. I have made suggestions on the cuecat record for improvement and would welcome your comments and suggestions. Will you please join this and add your comments? Thank you (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
Thank each of you, wiki editors and such, for giving me such great pointers and also for the direct emails of encouragement in learning this process. Shabbat Shalom - and since it's Friday I plan to make my additions and updates to the record on Monday. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC) (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
Just letting you know I've speedily tagged it as G3. → Σ τ c. 00:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
WWE does let fans use and show off photos to websites for informational reasons and to show people that points of intrest in the shows. Tiffany Nicole Herrington ( talk) 02:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I've done the fair use reduction for this image. Can you please delete the original? Beyond My Ken ( talk) 03:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Also, I've been following the rather strange conversation on User talk:BruceWHain, but haven't commented there because (a) I have nothing to apologize for, and (b) I have no desire to stir things up. I am concerned, however, about what he plans to do when he comes off his block. I'm sure you were probably planning to anyway, but would you mind keeping Luchow's on your watchlist, and keeping a weather eye on it? It would be appreciated. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 23:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sowy for dowing that . I'm just jealous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jibberjabbermouth ( talk • contribs) 03:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank for the move and the note how to do it properly. MaroonGray213 ( talk) 03:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
C. Fred can you help?
I posted to Cue cat as I said I would. Once again Bbb23 undid my work as he has done to all other. But in the process of dismantleing my work he left out the Codie Ward for cue cat. Would you look over my links for the award and consider improving the file of cue cat on my behalf for the codie award? Seems, me being new and female is hurting me. Can you help improve the cue cat file? I have left the links and info in the discussion page. Thanks ProofPlus Professional Researcher 16:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
GUYS thank you so much for your help and guidance. I am trying to learn and will get better I promise. Now will start on some facts that are incorrect in the record. Thanks for your kind help. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 18:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC) I will get better I promise guys. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 18:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
I began over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisa Gabrielli and had a hard time believing that someone who has done so much over such a long time [6] could not be sourced. With a bit of research, I learned that this woman has a fist full of AKA, and under her many different psseudonyms her rather hefty career is imminently sourcable. [7] [8] [9] [10] The article's author was apparently too lazy, but the well has only just been tapped. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I mean this in the nicest of ways, but you need to stop bothering everyone and their personal edits. Most are constructive, however you are opinionated and feel they are not constructive. Do not forget that the idea of Wikipedia is a group effort, not your private project. You had better stop or I will need to report you to the board. 71.132.196.34 ( talk) 23:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey C. Fred, can you look at the Cue cat discussion and see the topic where Kbb23 and Cullen make the same edist to any and all records for digital convergence? Look up net talk live and cue cat. Seems weird to me that two different users make the same edits to different records totally but interconnect to the history of this company???/ ANy suggestions??? ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
This person, Marco Safwat always tries to delete facts from this page, Qnet ltd, as he is trying advertise this company, as one of its IRs who tries to advertise his company, by just Copying its Profile information from its Website. I don't know how to report him, I'm just asking for an action as he's keeping deleting facts and posting his company's profile. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterjmikhail ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I have tagged Qnet ltd because it has multiple problems and is a mess. I described some of the problems on the talk page. Hopefully some discussion will take place there. My opinion is that most of it should be deleted and should not be on wikipedia.
KennethSides ( talk) 15:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. I only have a question, Can I know which source you found that is not considered a "reliable source"?? Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterjmikhail ( talk • contribs) 01:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Fred I know I am stumbling, and yes I say Kbb23 Cullens accusations, but I just warned them of liable with the words they attributed to an author, but was with that said.
I cannot for the life of me, figure out the links process. Can you help me?
I addded a statement by Ebay ceo, who licenses the scan commerce patents, and how ebay now has 56 million scan app users. Can you link it for me? I will send you a virtual coffee LOL
Any way here are the links:
Users confirmation: http://www.4-traders.com/EBAY-INC-4869/news/EBAY-INC-At-Industry-Conferences-eBay-Inc-s-CEO-John-Donahoe-Points-to-Major-Consumer-Shifts-13876819/ Second ceo ebay reference http://www.internetretailer.com/2011/11/03/smartphones-blur-line-between-stores-and-e-commerce
Link to ebay as licensee of patent portfolio http://www.rpxcorp.com/index.cfm?pageid=11
Sorry but I am learning and boy kbb23 is not playing nice ProofPlus Professional Researcher 20:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
Fred, thank you for your reply. RPX is the owner of the DigitalConvergence patents, see the uspto and the patents for inventor and digitalconvergence and you see they are owend by RPX and that is what RPX licenses to the 103 companies it list. SNIP>> Philyaw; Jeffry Jovan (Dallas, TX) Assignee: RPX-LV Acquisition LLC (Wilmington, DE)
Appl. No.: 09/614,937
SHORT LINK: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22Philyaw,+Jeffry+Jovan%22&OS="Philyaw,+Jeffry+Jovan"&RS="Philyaw,+Jeffry+Jovan"
Short version: Philyaw Inventor - DigitalConvergence 1st assignee, sold to LV, LV bought by RPX. PPXCORP.COM, they now license this portfolio and was there largest aquisition. Ebay, Micorsoft and other. RPX is also the citation needed for above in the article but I do not know how to do links yet. Thats why I turned to a mentor like you. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
ALL the records reflect: Assignee: RPX-LV Acquisition LLC (Wilmington, DE)
This is the LONG link for them all, but you have to click one by one: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=Philyaw%2C+Jeffry+Jovan&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs) 21:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
fred ALL of the wiki record on Cue cat mentions CRQ, the codes, the scanning and digital convergence AND YOU GUYS merged the record. So, one cannot be selective and say CUE CAT and thats software. They are one in the same. CRQ was the software and CUecat was ONE of 8 devices digital had. So, how can you NOW isolate CueCat. CUECAT CRQ DIGITALCONVERGENCE bar code reading ARE ALL IN THE RECORD and thus it is important and they ALL use the CRQ scan system. How can you pick it apart and and not see that? Will you please post up- the reference and help on this matter? we are all trying to improve the real record. please help ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
Please be fair on this Fred and help someone trying to make this one record better. Be fair. New people need help and heros not walls and judgements. I am really trying, but there is so much hate and bias in this record its unbearable. I am trying to be a great contributor and I am not glossing over the record, I am just putting the facts as they are. Please help and be a hero to a mom with frazzeled nerves already. I could really use a WIKI friend right about now. Please ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
FRED, bb23 adn Cullen CLEARLY posted that "jovan" was "conartstry" and "Psycho" and those statements are BOTH NOT ALLOWED and INFLAMATORY ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
A few years ago, we told you about Dallas' own Music Man, J. Jovan Philyaw ("Goodbye Kitty," June 6, 2001), the man behind the CueCat, Net Talk Live!, Tripledge Wipers and other testaments to his con-artistry. Now, Jovan has reinvented himself again--and this time, Buzz must say, he's really outdone himself, in the same entertainingly psycho way that Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf outdoes himself with each new press conference. ("There are no tanks. Oh, those tanks, the ones behind me? We have those tanks surrounded.")
Celeste, Eric. " Crystal Clear". Dallas Observer. 10 April 2003. Accessed 11 November 2011.
FRED STATS as to WHY the RPX issue and license is REAL VALID AND IMPORTANT:
On the article for cuecat the reference count are as follows:
13 references to cue cat as device
8 references to DigitalConvergence as company
22 references to the actual software and backend
12 references to the database actions
so, out of 55 references, 94% are about the software, company and database and YOU ASK WHY IS THE LICENSE IMPORTANT?
117 Patents and ONE is for CueCat the Device and 99.8% are about the software, backend and databsse functions and YOU ASK WHY THE LICENSE AND SUCH IS IMPORTANT TO THE RECORD?
Come on FRED. This is an encylopedia, you can just pick and choose what are facts!!!!
Please help me! ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
PLEASE UNDO YOUR UNDO ON THE REFERENCE TO LICENSE OF THE IP. I have proven my point beyond a shadow of a doubt and I need you to be fair and not make this an undo redo. Come on Fred, I have proven my case. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
21:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
I keep seeing notes I did not sign right. IS it just ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC) of (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)) inside Parens??? I am confused so I have been doinw both
A. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC) B (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC))
which is right? Thanks my kind friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Fred and Jeff, I am doing the four tildes, but seems it keeps posting wrong. Got the tildes down but seems not to be showing right. Do I need to update something on my side to make it work right? Point me where to? ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
—'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]])
; that makes sure that my user and user talk pages are linked in my signature, as I have the treat-as-markup box checked. —
C.Fred (
talk)
21:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Edward Maclagan was the original title, to which umpteen articles were linked or redirected. However, that name was wrong. I could live with the article omitting the middle name - "Douglas" - but the capitalisation was also incorrect. It should have been "MacLagan", per the various books/official reports that he published. So, I moved Edward Maclagan to Edward Douglas MacLagan, fixed one obvious link problem related to Horace Arthur Rose ... and seem to have gotten myself in a right pickle.
I recall from something that you told me in the past (re: merging Patna University articles, IIRC) that a bot comes round and straightens out a lot of this stuff. But if you have the time then could you please check that I've done this correctly? There are so many permutations of the name, including "E. Maclagan", "E. D. Maclagan", "E. MacLagan", "E. D. MacLagan", "Edward Maclagan", "Edward MacLagan" ... you get my drift. I am not convinced that I have got this right, although I am convinced that the correct full name is Edward Douglas MacLagan & can point people to various published sources for verification thereof. - Sitush ( talk) 02:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello C Fred, I'm inquiring to discuss the deletion of The M Machine's page. You listed G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.madeevent.com/ElectricZoo/artists.php?REFID=madeweb. I was using that reference to cite The M Machine's presence at the Electric Zoo Festival, and double posted the same reference because I thought I hadn't saved the edit the first time. Can you help? Thanks! Dustinslush ( talk) 05:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustinslush ( talk • contribs) 04:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
That's the group's official bio, why can't that be in the wikipedia page? Sorry if I don't understand. Dustinslush ( talk) 23:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
I was wondering this: It appears that you have had to deal with some rogue IP's lately, and that temporary blocking was involved. If I ever come across a Wikipedian who is continually vandalizing articles, how do I warn them and eventually create a temporary block? I hope I never have to do this, but I should know. Mallen22 ( talk) 01:21, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
You might have had a simpler decision-making process on those Trina articles if you had looked here.— Kww( talk) 13:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
NoseyFruitcake3 ( talk) 19:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC) I am trying to upload an image but its freaking not working!
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(
talk)
19:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC) OK!
I am in the process of a draft article, and it is almost complete except the filmography and references section are not formatting correctly on screen even though they are on the edit page. Could you please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Fay_Wolf and see if you can fix that error? Thanks! Also, this is my first article, so please give some feedback. - Mallen22 ( talk) 01:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
|}
on it: that marked the table as ended and made it display in the filmography section.<ref>
tags in the article, so there's nothing to pull down into references. Because of this, if the article went live, it would be subject to an immediate proposed deletion: all biographies of living people must have references. —
C.Fred (
talk)
02:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Hello,
Regarding your comments on the school anthem, I shall work on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRSM_Terendak
Shahrulazwad ( talk) 06:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Your contribution is encouraged. Mangoe ( talk) 18:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Vinnie is back, claiming UFO researcher help.... Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 20:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Please would you ask your fellow editors to stop writing nonsense about "vandalism" on my page. I added a verified helpful comment to an article. It was meant to warn the public of the risks of using a particular "cashback" site. In return I am called a vandal. These editors obviously have some strong emotional (or financial) link to the subject matter and regard other's contributions as NPOV.
I would like to remind you and other editors that Vandalism is: The conduct or spirit characteristic of, or attributed to, the Vandals in respect of culture; ruthless destruction or spoiling of anything beautiful or venerable; in weakened sense, barbarous, ignorant, or inartistic treatment. OED These editors are the culprits: Favonian, Barek, Bwilkins, Calabe1992
Their actions are authoritarian and only serve to alienate normal users of Wikipedia. Even more so than that picture of Jimmy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fghgfhgfhgfh ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the first comment. Neologism and Brown Thursday. When is it considered non neologism? How many pages must be populated, how many newscasters must use the word before it is not neologism?
Regarding the second comment.. who... That is why I included the link to the google search, there are several people (mostly common citizens), myself included.
Please work with me, in improving my article as it is my first, instead of deleating it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pesnider ( talk • contribs) 22:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
I see your comments and will edit the article and add references, but it is going to be later tonight. I see that I have approximately 7 days to get the article where it needs to be or else it will be deleted. Thank you for working with me, and offering suggestions. Regarding the who, can I just use a source online, or can I say friends of user:pesnider. I can post a poll through survery monkey and get results over the next few days. What qualifies as the who? Can I simply say me? Thank you for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pesnider ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#MangoWong Block review - Sitush ( talk) 03:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
This is for adding an edit summary to Seventh-Day Adventist Church, so I understand the purpose of the removal of the category. "Oh, that makes perfect sense!" 78.26 ( talk) 01:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
Your note was very timely and correct and is much appreciated. Thanks - Youreallycan ( talk) 01:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred,
Why are you always undoing my edits on transfer factors? How can the source of Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR.net) be considered a vague source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.10.11 ( talk) 02:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C. Fred,
Thanks for sending me the message on links. I was unsure where I could contribute the information on the SAE initiation ritual. I'm unsure if my other most recent edits were ok, but I included the ritual as a reference to what I had. I have other references if that's ok as well. I'm just trying to make the article content more comprehensive. Thanks! SAEAlum ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC).
Could you have a quick look editor just reverted on UKIP thanks, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/08aviee Mo ainm ~Talk 18:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
It was right to begin with. I knew it was not the first toll road in the state when I created the article, and don't know how that got changed. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, I do not want to cause any kind of trouble but...how come my page was deleted? Every single part of it was true you know...Me and my mate we do a web show and we thought people might want to see information about it. We beg of you to let it back up. Thanks.
Robbie 5001 ( talk) 08:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, could you have a look at Zang-Hee Cho? Having spent some time this morning doing a bit of fixing of the unreferenced biography of Ryong Ryoo created by the same user, the style of the Zang-Hee Cho article set my antennae twiching. Particularly given your comment on the User talk page re the copyright infringement of two other articles (which I didn't register until after I'd done the work on the Roo article). I have tried to check both the Roo article and Zang-Hee Cho for evidence of copyright infringement but I'm coming up blank. They both look like copy and paste to me but I can't spot the source. Doesn't appear to be the same as the others (unless I'm being dense). Subject appears notable enough, so the article could be stubbed. Don't want to do any more on this before someone with rather more experience has a look. -- CharlieDelta ( talk) 10:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
re this [11] I think you meant Big Brother 01 (UK). Leaky Caldron 20:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
why did you delete that page? it meant alot and now its gone... thanks alot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.119.113.60 ( talk) 04:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if France airs it first. Canada is still the country of originality, and since the show is Canadian, only the Canadian airdates will be shown. Even though Australia aired TDWT first, the Australian airdates are not in the infobox. So yeah, time is not a manner, it's originality. Yes, we might get all the episode information right before the show even airs on Canada, but note that the infobox says "Original Run" which means that we are still going to put everything as it is airing in Canada. :) Giggett ( talk) 01:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Quicklinks to WikiProjects(Wiktionary, WikiNews etc) are needed on Wikipedia and vice-versa, in the header or on the left-margin column. Please consider including these to the existing links for the convenience of users navigation from one project to another. Rockin291 ( talk) 15:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice regarding the article on Qnet ltd, I will try my best to edit the article to make it more informative and written from a more neutral point of view and maybe include some of the supporting points of view. But I believe this will be better done by other members as I am currently opposed to the way the company operates in my country Mohehab ( talk) 16:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. Rubinkumar ( talk) 23:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Asking if You Like Selena Gomez |
Do you like Selena Gomez? I know I do! =P ★♛iluvselenagomez1234♛★ ( talk) 17:12, 17 December 2011 (UTC) |
With these edits, an editor has done a good thing, namely, adding a free use photo of the subject of an article where there had been none before. However, in the article itself, there is a lot of wiki markup showing around the picture (not in the editing window, in the article itself). This is not my area; is this something you can easily fix, or at least, direct someone to Bart Starr who does know how to fix it? 74.178.230.234 ( talk) 20:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey! I have almost got my first article down, except I cannot get references right! I read the article on how to do them, how to use ref tags, etc. I formatted it correctly, too, but it only shows 1, 2, and 3 instead of the name of the reference. Please help! I really need it. Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Fay_Wolf and please fix this! Thanks. - Mallen22 ( talk) 04:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
on my talk page. 74.178.230.234 ( talk) 04:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, saw that my article regarding The Alternates was deleted. I checked the band guidelines for Wikipedia and The Alternates fit the criteria to submit the article, they have notablitity. How can I not have the article deleted if I resubmit? Any suggestions? -- DavidSCastro ( talk) 21:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
I notice that you have recently edited Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 and would like to make you aware that I'm seeking consensus on the article on the talk page . -- Mrmatiko ( talk) 09:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Please Stop Adding Speedy Deletion Notices As You Did With Whimsical Ponies. Just Because You Don't Know About It Doesn't Mean It Is False. You Want Me To Add References? Fine. Also, Why Don't YOU Do Some Research. Google Is A Thing Of A Breakthrough.
Love,
GenghisKhan12 ( talk) 03:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
C.Fred, I Thank You Kindly For Branding My Page With A Speedy Deletion Tag, Resulting In The Deletion Of My Page. Now That I Think Of It, Thank You For At Least Giving Me A Chance To Present References And Demonstrate The Importance Of The Page. It's Not As If The Page Was Speedily Deleted Before I Could Add A Section About The Importance Of The Article. I Think What You Are Doing Is A Good Deed To Humanity, For I Believe That You Do Know Everything About Everything, And If You Have Never Heard About It Before, Then It Musn't Be True! I Especially Love The Fact That You Threaten People On Their Talk Pages With "Just So You Know" Information. It's Not As If The Whimsical Ponies Page Was Of Any Importance. It Was Probably All A Joke. Once Again, Thank You For Recognizing The Insignificance Of A Small Business That Has Grown To Something Beautiful.
Love, GenghisKhan12 ( talk) 03:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Please have a look on iTunes, which is exactly the season-order in which Nick airs the show, and there you can see that "Blooptorious" is S02E13 & "A Christmas Tori" is S03E01! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dupewrest ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fred,
This is regarding Somavanshi Kshytriya page in Wiki, There are many articles in Wikipedia which have large portions of text un-cited, unverifiable. Still these articles exist.
This page existed in wiki since a long time as long as 2008, until recently when it was deleted. I have cited notable people. The map showing where people exist. The mention of the community in religious text and books. What more is needed? why are you so persistent on deleting this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninadraut123 ( talk • contribs) 03:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi, C.Fred - Not sure if you are in charge re burntout1234, but is there any chance that you (or somebody else) kindly release burntout1234 as the legitimate and fully disclosed doppelgänger of butntout123 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Burntout123)? If you are not in charge or if there is CoI, then kindly refer me to whoever is in charge. I left 2 similar messages for Joe and Crit I think. Thanks. -- -- S.Buntout123 ( talk) 20:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you dropped into Talk:A. Nesamony recently. I am struggling to get my point across to the major contributor, and it is perhaps not helped that I know a little of that person's history here. Some genuinely neutral guidance would, I think, be useful. I am trying to remain focussed and certainly have no vested interest in the subject matter, but I am beginning to query my own understanding of WP policies etc. This is one of those messy situations where a calm, uninvolved message might assist enormously.
I do recognise that since I first got involved there have been other sources introduced, which is A Good Thing & entirely down to the work of the major contributor because here at my end I have been able to find next to nothing. I have tried to acknowledge this but, perhaps, inadequately. I really do think that the subject is notable; the issue is more in relation to how it is depicted as such. Perhaps I am being pedantic? - Sitush ( talk) 00:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
by her record label and herself,so the facts remains. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinlovemusic ( talk • contribs) 09:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
I have recieved permission from the author of the sterling website that you have looked over to use this information in the Sterling Office Moving Wikipedia article. If need be you may contact them at [redacted].
Thank You
June 13th — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Chelmsford4 (
talk •
contribs)
16:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, why was my edit on Happy Feet Two reverted? I had sources provided with the information. Please reply on my talk page if you get a chance.-- BarrettM82 Contact 00:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Fred,
We do have original feedback with us, some of them have been posted on our website.
You can talk to any of our clients if your wish we would provide their contact details.
We are new to wikipedia and and wish to create our presence here since through wikipedia we can reach and help a large number of students.
All the information mentioned is original and we are accountable for it.
regards Nitesh Gawade (please don't post phone #s here. removed) Edify Labs — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDIFYLABS ( talk • contribs) 05:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Could you monitor the article, there is some disruptive IP again. Id appreciate if such IPs get blocked from the article per WP:BLP, it has stopped from being funny already a while ago. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 20:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
What were the reasons for contesting Mysto & Pizzi's page and retracting it from the wikipedia community? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarquetti ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Mysto & Pizzi should be recognized, and there are various evidence stating their accomplishments and career, even from the wikipedia community. This deletion should be retracted, here are some sources in regards to mysto & pizzi.
from wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special%3ASearch&search=mysto+pizzi
mysto & pizzi -w- geico -> http://www.geico.com/about/commercials/music/ mysto & pizzi -w- ultra records -> http://ultrarecords.com/artists/mysto--pizzi/# mysto & pizzi -w- youtube -> http://youtube.com/mystoandpizzi mysto & pizzi -w- itunes -> http://ax.search.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSearch.woa/wa/search?entity=song&media=all&page=1&restrict=true&startIndex=0&term=mysto+pizzi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarquetti ( talk • contribs) 23:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this Mysto & pizzi just recreated yet again a few minutes ago. It's not quite the same as the previously deleted version (although it's an utter mess). I 've gone through all the refs and there do appear to be claims of notability this time, so I'm erring on the side of caution rather than deleting it and I'm a quandry as to what to do. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 06:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred,
I have been attempting to sign on my user account for the last 10 minutes.
I've been using the right password and for some reason it's saying it's not valid; however, it is.
It might be possible that someone hacked my account recently and changed my password.
Can you please help me?
Thanks.
User:ATC
108.41.105.93 (
talk)
22:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, me again. I have just removed one of the two entries on the Kambar disambig page. Much as I enjoyed my time studying at Cambridge, the entry there for a nightclub type of thing had existed since April 2008 without an article being created. Or, if an article was created then it has been deleted.
So, we now have a single-entry disambig page and this is daft. I could redirect it but have the feeling that this might not be the correct course. Do you have any advice? Is it an XfD situation? - Sitush ( talk) 01:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
A week ago you contributed a brief note at Talk:A._Nesamony. There was some response, in a new section erroneously suggesting vandalism, on the following day. I dealt with that as best I could. There has been no further action on the talk page until the last few hours, at which point Kumaripriya continued the thread. I have just replied to that. If you have the time then I would appreciate you casting your eye over it. I am not asking you to get involved but if I have acted inappropriately in my response then please let me know & I will amend accordingly. Obviously, if you want to get involved on the page itself then that is no problem but my primary purpose here is really to have someone judge if I am communicating in a reasonable manner or if, for example, I am being bite-y.
As an aside, I am missing something obvious here. Why can I not link directly to the relevant TP section? There should be a TOC that enables me to do that. Does this feature have to be enabled on talk pages? - Sitush ( talk) 01:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
At your request, I've rewritten the page to be neutral. I'd appreciate your feedback in helping the page to stay on wikipedia. I am involved with the organization, but I would like to keep the article neutral. I'm also new user to Wikipedia and I've been studying up on what makes a page appropriate for the site. I do have a question about notability. We are a national program in hundreds of schools across the US. As far as references, I've included articles written about the company in the external links; what else would you like to see on the page? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkirktx ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Is "Krazysexy music" is sock of "Robinlovemusic"?
Similar editing and uncivil manner. Please see
Trina discography.—
Iknow23 (
talk)
02:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
I saw you speedy deleted the redirect from Problem Sleuth to MS Paint Adventures under WP:R3. As there's a redirect from Homestuck to MS Paint Adventures, I think it's notable enough to warrant the redirect be brought back. Zig ( talk) 00:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
If you think the image was the same, then go to commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spread-Of-The-Black-Death.gif. You'll see it also spreads in Asia too. Then look where it says, "File:Spread-Of-The-Black-Death.gif". I could be right or wrong. If you disagree, then someone might have uploaded the file from Google Images or any other source of images.
Eric567 ( talk) 14:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Well, when I looked at it, I could have made a typing error. Follow these steps below. This might solve it.
1. Go to "The Black Death" on Wikimedia Commons
2. The first image on the top is the image I am talking about.
Eric567 ( talk) 08:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you or someone that can take care of my request just delete my page? I thought genealogy is something you can learn from, but apparently not. So, please delete it because I tried to look for that option, but couldn't find it. NeilsErikson ( talk) 18:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
i don't why you changing the right information i put that came from billboard magazine,the link was provided.
lil kim - hard core 1,400,000
eve first album - 2,000,000 74.176.66.36 ( talk) 20:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Will you check that for sources and stuff? Special:Contributions/67.185.251.75 ( User talk:67.185.251.75)
The I.P that got recently blocked seems to be back under the 31 hours. He seems to have a registered account and continues to do the same vandalism to my articles. Can you please block him again? I also think he is now acting as a sockpuppet since he is using his IP to prevent getting his registered user blocked. He also seems to the the author of the fan article Total Drama Destination. Giggett ( talk) 20:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The socking seems to be continuing (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Backlook). Semi-protection may be necessary if possible. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles ( pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.
To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie ( talk) 22:25, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
I would like to thank you for taking care of User:Dantherocker1 last February by revoking his talk page access while indef blocked. He has been bothering me on YouTube lately and admitted that he has been on Wikipedia before. Due to harassing me on YouTube and the fact that he was on Wikipedia, it has come to my attention that if he wasn't blocked, he would be vandalizing my userpage. NHRHS2010 the student pilot ✈ 15:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for your interest in the Morley Academy entry. We have tried to improve its accuracy by linking to well recognised information on our website. The previous section on Headteacher controversy was fairly malicious and had no reference other than to anonymous posts in a discussion thread. Not very credible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSATPolicy ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring the Jack Hoban page. Mtpublicaffairs ( talk) 20:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I already added an example of how the episodes should look like in the main total drama article. But the biggest and most controversial change that needs to happen is removing the elimination table as it makes the articles incredibly in-universe. So i was wondering if we can decide that. Bread Ninja ( talk) 20:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, possible request. Is it possible to develop an article Corbin Bleu and become a good article See the article Arabic Wikipedia good article, can you?-- 77.31.36.7 ( talk) 15:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Look at this version will help you to become a good article look-- 77.31.36.7 ( talk) 15:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm wondering if this comment should be deleted. It's an attempt (albeit circuitous) to out the editor who made the preceding comment. Voceditenore ( talk) 15:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
trina red bottoms number 100 on the r&b/hip-hop chart,and i don't see why you keep reverting the page.
http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/trina/252957
98.88.209.190 ( talk) 04:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes I have new information about trina,and i would love for you to add it.
http://hiphopwired.com/2011/07/14/trina-joins-%E2%80%9Cno-h8%E2%80%9D-campaign-photos/
http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/94340/ 74.190.22.214 ( talk) 20:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Adam (AJ) Devine, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Thou shalt not tag for A3 within minutes of creation. . Thank you. Danger ( talk) 05:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Bampublore is Vermapriya1986 all over again. Same odd typos in punctuation, same signature style, same whining, same articles, same sources, same attack mode. The SPI has been open for a while but Tnxman said the old a/cs are stale. S/he has thrown several unnecessary 3RR warnings at my page in the last hour, although I removed them. - Sitush ( talk) 20:49, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
hey C.Fred i was just wondering why you took my Shake It Up cast list off. I know you think it is to similar to Shake It Up (TV series) but I thought it was a cool idea because then someone who was wondering what the cast was or someones name or something they could just go there. And thanks for reminding me to sign my talk page posts.
sorry to bother, -- Sami0829 ( talk) 23:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm having trouble with certain edits in articles 'PPACA' and 'Health Insurance Mandate' by a user (TVC 15) that you appear to have deleted. He is blatantly non-NPOV but keeps reverting to his old text despite this (seemingly on the justification that simply if he has news links to it he can't be expressing PoV/non-NPOV. This seems to be vanadalism in favor of his PoV; but if he is deleted, how can he still do this? Help? Thanks 24/07/11 - from user: still needs to sign up to an account (will do so eventually, but only just started editting - I follow policy and the health care policy edits that TVC is vandalising are a problem to me, and I think any sincere wikipedian). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.188.221.123 ( talk) 21:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Hiyah, thanks for your help on my page, Im clearly new to this. I have seen some pages that dont have much info on the actors but the page has still been able to stay up. Hopefully this will stay. Again thanks for the help x ( Lola-razz ( talk) 20:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC))
Hi C. - yep, understood, point taken - -- Shirt58 ( talk) 16:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Can you bring that up on ANI? That was clearly retaliatory, and I've got a thread open there already on Yoseph in an attempt to get him on the right track. MSJapan ( talk) 01:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Response to MP Those notability and others were not retaliatory and you failed you let them go through the process of allowing other editors to check them for their merit. Your actions were arbitrary, assuming, and game playing. I looked at every person in that catagory for persons known for their contribution to Freemasonry and marked the ones that needed help and the ones that were canditates for deletion based upon the Wiki Rules for notability. You had no right not to allow them through the process.-- Yosesphdaviyd ( talk) 05:04, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Response to Fred - Even though the community rules are clear on that part, I could have sworn the tags said don't remove until the issue has been resolved. So guess one person can resolve it. Thanks. But a number of those articles clearly need help and he didn't even improve them before he removed the tag. He's a wikibully. :) -- Yosesphdaviyd ( talk) 06:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Moreover, wasn't there suppose to be a Deletion Discussion? No, he's a wikibully and a harrasser. I feel it. -- Yosesphdaviyd ( talk) 06:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
SwisterTwister has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Have a cookie as a friendly greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
I just requested a new name. Thx for letting me know, I hadn't thought of that. NZparliament ( talk) 18:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry I changed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futbol vic ( talk • contribs) 05:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm Ralph's grandson. My mom (his elder daughter, Ellen Berkowitz Carlin) told me the news two hours ago. No obits have been published yet (I don't think), but I imagine the Albuqurque, NM newspaper will run something tomorrow.
thanks, Peter Ames Carlin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteramescarlin ( talk • contribs) 00:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, but it was not a simple 'disagreement about an article'. Please read this. Moriori deleted all the links I added instead of only the one problem link (which I believe was caused by the Parliament site being in flux at that point due to Carter's resignation, as cut and paste is usually straightforward). He made no attempt to simply fix the error. He made no attempt to contact me so I could fix the error. He then implied he did NOT delete everything, when he should have at least apologized for that error. He blamed me for everything, and in an insulting, condescending, arrogant way. Finally, he selectively edited our disagreement on his Talk page to make himself appear to be in the right. As a supposedly experienced Administrator (I note he started editing in 2003), all that is very wrong. I refuse to waste my time with a project which puts destructive people in leadership positions. If those are the sort of people you want to be in charge, then you need to look for contributors far different from me. I suggest you try the local playground. Kiwigov ( talk) 15:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
At User talk:Kiwigov you said -- "And for the record, I support your edit to the John Carter (New Zealand) article; the link looks fine to me." Which link do you mean? Moriori ( talk) 21:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
TRLIJC18 ( talk) 04:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
Those can all be blocked as socks. We had this problem about a year ago, I don't remember the checkuser name exactly but I can try to find it if you want. -- Rs chen 7754 04:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred, I added more information of File:St. Anne's Church.jpg. I Originally took the photo in the 1950's, when I was younger, and made it into a drawing on Paint.net a cuple days ago. From there I added words to make it look more authentic, as if it was a postcard from the 50's. I hope this helped. -- Kenlukus ( talk) 02:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kenlukus (
talk •
contribs)
02:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying me about that edit. The Mark of the Beast ( talk) 01:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
How do I change my birthdate to the correct date or 10/05/1982 instead of the written 10/05/1981 without having it reverted back to the wrong date? IsaiahEk ( talk) 02:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Image copyright violations by User:Kenlukus. Thank you. ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/ CN 06:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
I only disagree with the term cult leader as Meher Baba never declared, himself to be a cult leader in any publication. ( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
in his interviews to charles purdom / meredith starr - Meher baba (see meher baba references) declared himself that he is Non dogmatic and his mission to west is not to establish any Cult or religion - He never classified himself as a cult leader
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:27, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
Sociologists can make several claims based on their personal research - That doeant mean u classify him as cult leader ( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
Info about Meher baba whethe he is a cult leader or not is not required in Don E Stevens article.
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 18:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)).
I note your comments above about including content from independent reliable sources. Many of the cited additions I have made regarding Baba have been reverted by other editors. I'm going to step away from the articles for now, as it is clear there are some editors who are quite passionate about defending them, and it is not a good use of energy on my part to engage if other editors are just reverting without discussing the merits of bringing an alternative view. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 19:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
As an avid fan of the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets, an extremely involved campus contributor, and a caretaker for the Ramblin' Reck, you are wrong in MANY areas of the "Ramblin' Wreck" article. You obviously are not a true fan of Georgia Tech as you do not know the proper name of our mascot. The Ramblin' Reck is properly spelled with an "R" and not a "W". I don't know where you got your information, but it is wrong. The media and Athletic Association have been wrong for a while in their spelling, but the true history is correct and credible. The original archives of the Georgia Institute of Technology mention the "Ramblin' Reck".
I was only changing your article for the misspelled name of the beloved name of my most cherished school. I'm glad that for at least an hour, the Wikipedia article was correct in its spelling. You can undo changes from true, knowledgeable Georgia Tech fans, but you will never be correct. Your sources and reasonings will always be flawed if you continue misname the Ramblin' Reck. You are incredibly disrespectful, and I was only trying to correct your article as many Wikipedia users do on a regular basis.
Before you try to oppress Wikipedia users and undermine the free speech of Wikipedia, you should get your facts straight. People are only trying to help before more people are misinformed about the topics of your articles.
Embaker823 ( talk) 17:27, 10 August 2011 (UTC) THE RAMBLIN' RECK
HIII
Glad to speak to you again. Actually, The indications I gave about the Cult leader statement in Meher Baba's article is apparently vandalism, as you could notice.
The sources the user indicated may be reliable but the interpretation of those sources form the user may not be true. This is what I tried to explain it to the other editor.
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 13:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)).
== Okay ==
( Dragonbooster4 ( talk) 14:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)).
Hi
An IP has today edited User:Kumaripriya with this.
In itself, no big deal - the edit is merely formatting etc and it is safe to assume that this is the registered user doing things while logged out.
However, also today, a fairly dormant account has edited an article on which Kumaripriya was warring & that has had no action for a while - see here. The images are already tagged by Fut. Perf but could this possibly be a sock? It seems to be quite a coincidence, especially since Kumaripriya has a history of working in Christianity-based articles and the alternate account has also made these edits. - Sitush ( talk) 23:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I tried to follow link but was told in edit mode that this is not the place to post requests, where is the right place? Thank you 04:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Could you also block User:Textenwikisearcher? I would also like to know whether these edits: [4] & [5] could be hid (so that their edit summaries are not shown in history). Thanks again! -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 21:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, C.Fred … You did a WP:CSD of J.C. Moreau ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) which has been recreated by the subject and author, Jcmoreau ( talk · contribs) … perhaps they need a stronger warning, and perhaps WP:SALT the article? Happy Editing! — 70.21.24.28 ( talk · contribs) 17:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
You may wish to comment at Template talk:UK year nav. Moonraker ( talk) 03:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
If I took a picture of Resop with my cell phone from the TV would that be alright? Thanks for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustangrrf ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello - I was made aware of your deletion of the Mary Ellen Mazey wikipedia page. I am in the Office of Marketing and Communications at BGSU - the owner of the page where the biographical information was taken. This is not a copyright violation - I was instructed to create the page by the University. I would like to see the page reinstated in full.
Please contact me with any further questions.
Jennifer Sobolewski Office of Marketing and Communications Bowling Green State University [redacted]@bgsu.edu
Jsobole ( talk) 20:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I found thru searching in Wikipedia that you deal with article merge issues. On 19 August I attempted to move an article I created in my workspace named User:Wpollard/NBRC. The title was to be National Board for Respiratory Care. I was unable to do this and was uncertain as to why. One possibility was an article by that name had just been created, so I looked for it. I did not find it and moved my article to NBRC, reasoning that I could look into this matter more fully later.
When I looked into this, I found someone had created such an article, although it contained much less info than the one I created. I created a discussion page in NBRC proposing the two articles be merged.
Someone merged them, but lost the unique info in the article I created. I could manually put the info back, as I printed a copy once my article was finished. I make hard copies of some new articles, because I have run into a somewhat similar situation before. Is there a way to retreive the info from the NBRC article, thus making it easier to truly merge the two articles?
Thanks for your time. Bill Pollard ( talk) 22:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
vedette is the latin(spanish) version of showgirl which are stage female performers that act,sing or dance. You can also know what they are by searching for eather vedette or showgirl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santiagokdasilva1 ( talk • contribs) 00:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Disruptive single-purpose account who is again on his monthly campaign against the article. Could you block him? Just to make sure he understands WP is not a place where you can continuously get away with this. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 20:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Disruptive single-purpose account who is again on his monthly campaign against the article. Could you block him? Just to make sure he understands WP is not a place where you can continuously get away with this. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 20:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
I seem to have attracted even more attention than is usual. It would not surprise me if this is another off-wiki concert party. Thanks for your help so far. - Sitush ( talk) 06:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Since you just blocked Truefact1979 for crossing 3RR after warning on Yadav, could you do the same for User:Nishukumar on James Tod; it's pretty clear (you issued the 3RR warning), and would save me having to fill out the whole 3RRNB report. Thanks. Qwyrxian ( talk) 06:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
On WP:ANI, you asked if there was a way to mass delete pages. Did you know about Special:Nuke? It it exactly what you were looking for. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 08:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
This database is crucial for anyone researching Australian theatre history - it's got records of performances by Peter Finch, etc - like an IMDB for Australian theatre. I've done a bunch of entries on Australian actors, writers and directors for wikipedia and always use it. Dutchy85 ( talk) 06:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
C.Fed, I don't know why it's not turning up for you - maybe it's because information about Australia's theatre history is so unrepresented on the web. (Something Ausstage is trying to fix up) It also might be because researches use Ausstage as a database to access primary sources of information - you look up, say, Peter Finch and get the dates of performances he's been in, then access newspapers from those dates to get reviews, etc. This is what I've done when I've used it for academic articles I've written on Frank Harvey and Alec Coppel. If you google "ausstage" you will see it has quite a presence eg http://www.adsa.edu.au/news/call-for-proposals-ausstage-symposium, http://www.nla.gov.au/pub/gateways/archive/57/p07a01.html. The reason I gave it it's own page was I was constantly using Ausstage as an external link for biographical entries, same as IMDB or IBDB and felt it deserved a page to explain to anyone who was looking to click on it what they were getting. It's a terrific resource for theatre historians and ask that wikipedia allow it to stay up there. Thanks Dutchy85 ( talk) 06:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I notice that you have warned this editor about edit warring, some of his edits since then (esp. this one) would indicate a bit of time in the cooler might help him. Mt king (edits) 05:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
C.Fred, So if someone outside my company posted the same thing it would be okay because it is coming from an independent source? In relation to encouraging deletion of a competitor posting I request that purely because it is now untrue. I wouldn't care if you have 1000 independent consultants in that section as long as they are truly independent and Newfield IT (who I personally have nothing against) are not independent, they are clearly owned by Xerox so that should be the end of the discussion on that and they should be moved or deleted if your real interest is accuracy and honest representation. I should note that I only copied the format that Newfield IT, Print Operations Group etc. used so if mine was so wrong then they must be too? First it was that I was trying to advertise Fulton Francis which was not the case because I followed same format as everyone else and did not make any statements about our market position or capabilities, then it was adding inappropriate external links which again was the same as everyone else and now it is the conflict of interest...I'm confused: Getting back to the question, have we overcome the first two issues and is it now a matter of having this uploaded by someone independent of Fulton Francis? Bfrancis73 ( talk) 21:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the "junior" college on the Rose State College page. I've been invited to upload the correct logo, however, I have no link through which to upload it. Can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rose State College ( talk • contribs) 21:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
This is your pro forma notification of a thread involving you, and also including you, since you're too fast for me. Drmies ( talk) 03:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Goodafternoon I am receiving emails from you saying I can not edit my page.. I am Sal Abbatiello and all the edits I am making are about me.. My User name on here is fevermusic... P Lease let me know how I can edit MY OWN PERSONAL info and how to stop you from changing it back— Preceding unsigned comment added by fevermusic ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I am writing to inquire after the deletion of the article "The National Theatre of the World." This deletion was, apparently, established on the basis "G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.thenationaltheatreoftheworld.com/The_World.html." I interpret this to mean that the inclusion of the URL here specified infringed upon Wikipedia guidelines. I apologize if this indeed is the situation and am willing to remove any flagged material/urls in conflict. Montroseworld78 ( talk) 18:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi C. Fred,
I've completely reworked the Farmhouse Foods page and simply given basic information about the brand. I understand now what the problem was with the previous post.
( Foodman11 ( talk) 23:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)).
Hi, C.Fred. Heyjudejang and Osakafreid you blocked are sockpuppet of User:Philip126. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philip126. Thank you. ―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 11:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on User_talk:Pierceybrian23. I cannot tell if this guy is just being arrogant or plain ignorant. He did this previously as User:Pierceybrian22 as well under numerous IPs. It's not blantant vandalism, but now that he is ignoring warnings and bordering 3RR, maybe he'll learn something. But I've said that before. -- Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ( talk) 23:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Is it normal to permutate redirects of articles to quite the extent that was done here between 17:14 & 17:21 today? The contributor has done this sort of thing a few times, IIRC, but it seems a little extreme to me. - Sitush ( talk) 20:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I wonder if you would be interested in helping me with my research on Wikipedia. I am writing a dissertation on Wikipedia as part of my undergraduate course at the University of Cambridge. What I am asking is for you to complete a questionnaire with a number of general, subjective questions about your experiences working on Wikipedia, for example concerning Wikipedia's culture, your motivation in participating and so on. It should take 10-20 minutes. Participants will be anonymous if requested. More information is available if you are interested. Thanks! I really appreciate any time you can give! Thedarkfourth ( talk) 07:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
why do you keep deleting the ROBC page? — Preceding chuch8736 comment added by Chuch8736 ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE HELP ME EDIT THE PAGE FOR J M!!!! (iamawesome100) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamawesome100 ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Thank you!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamawesome100 ( talk • contribs) 03:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Is there any chance that you could take a look at the contributions of User:Kunwaryogendrasinghlodhikheriyarafatpur to Lodhi, since you reverted some edits fairly recently. Thanks. - Sitush ( talk) 06:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey C.Fred. I notice you've been processing some speedies. I am looking at History of Animal Rights, an article that has existed since early July. It duplicates the history part of Animal rights, a much longer and more mature article. i.e. it's the same topic. There exists a speedy tag which seems to address this, Wikipedia:CSD#A10, for a 'Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic', a tag which I've never used. The creator of History of Animal Rights, User:Mozzyepic24 is not around to be consulted, since he is indefinitely blocked as a sock. The article has no substantive contributions besides those of the creator. I don't notice any interesting material in the article that's worth preserving. Is this an A10 candidate? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 05:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the intervention, just saw it . Have no idea who that is. I'll look through it in the morning and see if anything looks familiar. Again thanx.
Mlpearc If you reply here, please leave a {{
Talkback}} on
my talk.
05:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Why has this page been deleted, I was told to give a reason why it was important but two people thought it would be funny to vandalise my page (you can check if you want)then Wikipedia hadn't taken the original page on the history so I had to write it all out again! Then as soon as I finished you had removed it for not changing what I had been told to so well thats hours of my life wasted thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stotto1119 ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Better now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawarene ( talk • contribs) 15:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
9/21/11 The edit to Naturopathy is better, though it ends on a note that is untrue. There have been many research studies indicating the efficacy of Naturopathic medicine. I will edit the page again at a later time with links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitton14 ( talk • contribs) 05:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
My band has released a song, has a Facebook page, has played atleast 80 shows, and gets paid. I published the page to show my other member the link so he could say if it was official so I could add the links to the page and videos. It does have significance too since nearly 2000 people would wanna read the article. Restore it dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LondonBell ( talk • contribs) 05:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred,
Please delete the David Herskovitz post. The name is misspelled, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
C. Fred the last name should end in a Z not S. Can you please amend this or instruct me of how to do so?
Thank you
Sources for Correction of Spelling. In addition to ending in a Z, there should also be an 'H' before the letter K.
In the New York Times article Second Paragraph The spelling is -
'If Kim Hastreiter is most familiar as one of the two editors of Paper (the other is David Hershkovitz)' http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/08/fashion/08Gimlet.html?pagewanted=all
Another NY Times Article Spells the Last name as Hershkovitz, Eleven Lines you can find the correct spelling. "With the encouragement of the magazine’s other founder, David Hershkovits, she agreed. “The idea of influencers is like C.E.O. magazine,” Ms. Hastreiter said. “If you have 100 C.E.O.s read your magazine, it’s valuable. Small is big.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/fashion/extra-extra-papers-event-planning-affiliate-ny-fashion-week.html?ref=fashion
Also, the books he published are spelled David Hershkovits http://books.google.com/books?id=Srt_GwAACAAJ&dq=david+hershkovits&hl=en&ei=yUF7TpaTOsjl0QH2gvC5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
C.Fred Can this page please edited correctly ASAP. With the correct spelling as Hershkovitz Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
C. Fred,
The name should be spelled as Hershkovitz. The sources I provided spell the name as Hershkovitz, not Hershkovits, please can you amend this soon. Other spellings are incorrect, as my previous sources show.
Thank you, Ncacia ( talk) 14:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
My mistake, Thank you C. FRed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncacia ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I have edited out what seems to be the conflict of interest issues,may you please review as i would like to at least put it up so others may help... Thank you C.Fred for all of your help! URL is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Michaelparks/Bert_Oliva -- Michaelparks ( talk) 17:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Okay then question, someone from the old article posted pictures from different newspapers and magazines(now I'm glad i copied everything from the original article). I was wondering if I can use those? Newspapers like the Miami Herald and business magazines are all reliable sources, so i went to each link that was posted and downloaded each picture... what can i do with this? How do i show this as evidence? Also one wikipedia mediator or something a said that it would be okay if i just had the name of the media(Miami Herlad/Biz Bash/etc.) and date that that would be an exception to not having the actual article accessible on the internet. Also! I checked out some of his videos and you can see him on NBC, CBS, CNN and other big names. I understand if someone just told me this stuff but i saw in the videos facts that he has been on these shows and tv channels. Basically i have 2 mediums of facts that I'm not sure how to get them right for you to exept them, but there are existent and van be found! :) Thanks for all the help! -- Michaelparks ( talk) 18:04, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
I added spam to the reason for deletion and deleted it. There's been some spamming at the magazine's page, and this looked to me to be a continuation of it undercover. Peridon ( talk) 20:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I had created an artile under Bioteknika. It was deleted. Is there any updates that are required?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuber.ksp ( talk • contribs) 06:06, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, If you deleted my article, could you please remove it completely, I do not won it like this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Shapira on the Google search Thank you VERY VERY much Regards Svetlana Ivanova. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.215.223 ( talk) 12:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you for removing the obnoxious racist edits to the Holly Springs page! Allthingstoallpeople ( talk) 03:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
I accidentally reverted your edit. Your change was promptly adopted. Thank you. -- Fayerman ( talk) 05:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Although obviously this unsourced article would not stand as it is , it clearly asserted importance. Please restore, and perhaps there will be sources available, though even then it might not pass AfD. (I know I have the ability to do so myself, but I want to ask you first.) Incidentally, the ed. who placed the tag has placed a good many incorrect speedies, as judged by a number of admins, and I'd suggest checking his tagging quite carefully DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Fred, Prior to making 'undos' it is requested that you visit the polarized, biased information formerly on this article and question your ethics as a CPA if the article was not, in fact, biased before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pharmameatsdorkies ( talk • contribs) 02:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Their wedding was verified by Associated Press, that was the "AP" reports. Just google it and you will see. Their people verified as India Times and others were just putting something to sell papers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamajoe777 ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
[Copy of warning I left on IP's page removed.]
Why should I be blocked for Adding Information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drugsarebad89 ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Why do people keep reverting information i add what is the problem with what I put. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drugsarebad89 ( talk • contribs) 01:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to post facts on wikipedia I have no Idea why people would be reverting everything I post — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drugsarebad89 ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Fred. the editor is just playing a game, and has consistently done the same type of things over and over. I don't know exactly how far this vandal goes, but I can see the sequence of edits that have lead us to this particular point. The Billy Jean article(from Hungryforfun9000 1, 2, 3, 4)(from blocked Masterknowledgelol 1) from anon ip 96.246.254.161 1, 2, 3 plus about 4 more of the same edits) and then Drugsarebad89 makes the same edits to the article 1 and then moves to other articles playing the same games and has already been blocked twice with this account. This needs Admin action and a CU over at SPI. I'll do it, but I don't have the time right now. Evidently, per edit summaries, the user has had interactions with the Admin Tide Rolls too. It's all in the contribution history and edit summaries. Thanks. Dave Dial ( talk) 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fred,
I will add more information on the Society soon. The Society's work is notable and worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia because the various other projects/pages it is connected to (Studies in Medievalism, Medievally Speaking, etc.) all happen under the umbrella of the organization. If it is the list of names that is problematic, I can certainly take those off and simply put a link to the Society pages soon to go up on the Studies in Medievalism website. Thanks for any help you can give me. Best, r — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utziputz ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Sure, Fred, go ahead and delete it. I don't have all the materials on the society's history at hand to make appropriate changes. It's existed since the 1980s, with members far and wide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utziputz ( talk • contribs) 15:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you for the help you gave my students working on the Weardrobe page - all of the class members, including me, their instructor, are newbies in the Wikipedia world. Efforts like yours are what makes Wikipedia a welcoming community where we can delve in and learn more about the backstage working of it. Thanks! LeshedInstructor ( talk) 14:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of that Rat Pack page! (I'm a newbie here) Skweezy ( talk) 01:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Show me one part of the paragraphed that I typed that didn't "improve" the article. My scriptures that I supported there support the post tribulation viewpoint. Last time I checked the discussion page, people were doing the same thing as I was doing. Putting scriptures to support THEIR VIEWPOINT.
If my statement didn't improve the article, i'm about to erase the whole discussion board.
You trying to censor what i'm saying cause you don't agree with it? That's not going to happen.
Please, stay the heck away from my post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HolyandClean ( talk • contribs) 01:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
The second revision was on a {{for}} hatnote template, which contains no such restriction. See Wikipedia:Hatnote#"For …, see …". Please feel free to weigh in at Talk:Goat Island, Trinidad and Tobago or Wikipedia:RM. Jokestress ( talk) 04:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
[Deleted article "Guitar Resonator"]
Unfortunately I missed the prior discussion about deleting this page. Discussion is closed and I'm wondering how it could be re-initiated. The article "Guitar Resonator" has been translated from de.wikipedia. As a long time guitar player I know most of the international publications in this field. International references show definitely a relevance in this group of guitar effects. The discussion showed some errors to me but I don't know how to re-initiate. What procedure do you recommend ? Xstring ( talk) 09:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, hope everything is well! I need your help; the page i helped create: "Bert Oliva" was deleted because they said it was a recreation of an older version. I worked with other people including yourself on creating new material, verbiage and references. How can I get this turned around? I think this wasn't a valid deletion.
Thank you very much for your time and help! -- Michaelparks ( talk) 17:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Ubuntu (operating system): you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
14:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
"Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Seattle SuperSonics, you may be blocked from editing. This appears to be the third account you've used today to vandalize the article. You may not abuse multiple accounts in this manner. —C.Fred (talk) 22:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)"
I apologize. I wasn't trying to vandalize the article. I simply didn't like the wording at the top of the page. Please explain to me how my edit can be considered disruptive, let alone vandalism? I promise you that this is my only account. Furthermore, let me explain to you why I edited the article, and how I did so without any intent of vandalism:
You see, I recently watched Sonicsgate, so I decided to look at the Sonics wiki page. When I read "This article is about the defunct Seattle basketball team. For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder." and then noticed that that part of the article changed when I refreshed the page a few minutes later, I decided to look at the page's edit history. And when I also noticed that that section of the article had been edited by several people, multiple times in the past couple of hours, I thought I should create an account, and try to make the friendliest edit possible, according to which statement I agreed with most at the top of the page. Thus, I changed "This article is about the defunct Seattle basketball team. For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder." to "This article is about the beloved Seattle basketball team, regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city."
Instead of defunct, I thought it should be noted how beloved the team was. I realize that this is the same word used in previous edits today, but it was just something I appreciated, and therefore wanted to keep in my edit. And then I added "regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city," in place of "For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder" because I feel it is disrespectful to call the Thunder the Sonics' reincarnation; especially after the way the Sonics were relocated to Oklahoma City.
So if these changes are considered vandalism, then once again I apologize, and I guess Wikipedia is not the place for me.
Thank you for your time, and sorry for any inconvenience.
P.S. Because of this experience, I will no longer make edits on Wikipedia. But if you are kind enough to take into account my point of view, I humbly ask that you make an edit that uses kinder words in the Seattle SuperSonics page than "defunct" and "incarnation" — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlfredoMontoya ( talk • contribs) 23:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I agree that those other two accounts look connected, but I promise you that my account is independent from those two. Therefore, can you explain to me why my edit was considered vandalism? I made such edit in good faith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlfredoMontoya ( talk • contribs) 23:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I thought I explained my edit to the introduction as such: Instead of defunct, I thought it should be noted how beloved the team was. I realize that this is the same word used in previous edits today, but it was just something I appreciated, and therefore wanted to keep in my edit. And then I added "regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city," in place of "For the current incarnation of the team, see Oklahoma City Thunder" because I feel it is disrespectful to call the Thunder the Sonics' reincarnation; especially after the way the Sonics were relocated to Oklahoma City.
I mistakenly undid your edit instead of just making the edit I made anyway, first. But I still don't appreciate you saying that I vandalized the page. I don't know what else I can do to prove to you that I'm not connected to Mistah Perfekshun nor DerpDderp, besides the assurances that I have already given. Yet that doesn't seem to be enough.
And I've already apologized for the similarities between my edit and the edits of the two aforementioned accounts , but you still refuse to explain to me why the edit I made was vandalism. What is so disruptive about me editing the introduction to the Seattle SuperSonics page, to state that "This article is about the beloved Seattle basketball team, regrettably relocated after 41 years in the city."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlfredoMontoya ( talk • contribs) 23:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Orangemike for the simple, straightforward explanation. I hereby apologize for my biased statement. But your explanation is also hypocritical, because how is calling the Thunder the "incarnation" of the Seattle SuperSonics, NOT biased or opinionated???
Whatever, I've wasted enough time on this topic. I guess being a life-long Sonics fan is not nearly enough to qualify me to edit a page about the Seattle SuperSonics, but having degrees from North Carolina State Univerisity is... Once again, thank you Orangemike for the simple, straightforward explanation. But most of all, thank you to the self-righteous prick, C.Fred, for ruining my Wikipedia experience. AlfredoMontoya ( talk) 01:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Hellow, regarding to the Article GPM Antivirus, can the developers/other editors edit the content of this article just only to remove the issues. I am not advertising or any other violations. and to stop deleting this article. I am gonna let the developers/other editors to edit the contents of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gian20 ( talk • contribs) 14:05, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Time to disable talk page access for this user? Clearly not getting with the program, and now with a large dump of copyvio. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
You give the very good response, which is civil response. I stating to JetBlast to follow your role models example. Thanks. -- B767-500 ( talk) 05:12, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
I've been having some difficulties with User:65.88.88.202, who is apparently contributing via a library/hotspot in New York. It took me a while to catch on to the fact that it is a static address but I did try to advise them a few hours ago.
Subsequent to that they yet again pushed exactly the same POV as they had previously been pushing on Kashmiri Pandit. The article is very poor (although I've actually increased the number of RS etc in it) but there is no need to replace one reasonable but unsourced statement with another that is both unsourced and unreasonable. Furthermore, they keep meddling with the mention of "Mongol", which was discussed on the article talk page here.
What should I do next? The idea of reporting this to WP:3RRNB for edit warring is a bit awkward if that IP address really is used by the location stated on the IP talk page. We could end up briefly blocking contributions from a major library, albeit at present the sole contributor from the address is clearly a the same person (edits are confined to Kashmiri subjects). - Sitush ( talk) 00:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
They've done it again, so I have reported at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:65.88.88.202_reported_by_User:Sitush_.28Result:_.29. This thread and your name are mentioned. - Sitush ( talk) 00:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Dear Sir:
I am willing to learn to share words that are listed as DICTIONARY terms. I am also willing to learn to share TALK pages.
Therefore, I request you unblock me and share the words which are now words in etymology.
Those that I share in cosmology which you believe on TALK pages are rambling are important to many of us who are creators, authors, science fiction writers, script writers, special effects creators, editors, publishers, and webhosts.
Please refer to all the articles, pages, photos, and references made with the words which I have requested to be included such as the Alphaverse and Omegaverse.
I have a strong suggestion that those who are of the interest in making Wikipedia the free encyclopedia that is the best in the world shall agree that it is best to include all words and not just those chosen by yourself.
It would be best if one who deletes information know that it is better to take one's creative words and (Ramblings) as you define them and create them into more of what one of your stature in life expects.
This is a formal humanitarian apology to one named C. Fred who has seen fit to delete me and block me. One having such POWER on EARTH must also define opulent control.
Those of us who are desiring to include words in our genre in social networking and futurists creations such as cosmology would appreciate your contributions to our cause in etymology on the free wikipedia.
Please know that much of what I read on Wikipedia appears as explanation in TALK form and articles.
Thank you for assisting me as a new contributor. Your help would be most appreciated in the editing the words and fields instead of simply deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.170.25 ( talk) 02:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Do you think that Kulin Brahmin and Kulin Brahmins can be merged boldly? Neither are great articles but they are also not duplicated content, just both about the same subject. The singular form is more commonly used for India caste articles, so Kulin Brahmin would contain the content.
I am almost tempted to cut them back to a short single para due to the poor sourcing, but one does have a few listed if they are not cited inline. - Sitush ( talk) 20:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Volume 4, Issue 3 • Fall 2011 • About the Newsletter | |||||
|
|
Project reports for
| |||
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Hello C Fred, I see you have both commented on the records for cue cat. I have made suggestions on the cuecat record for improvement and would welcome your comments and suggestions. Will you please join this and add your comments? Thank you (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
Thank each of you, wiki editors and such, for giving me such great pointers and also for the direct emails of encouragement in learning this process. Shabbat Shalom - and since it's Friday I plan to make my additions and updates to the record on Monday. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC) (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
Just letting you know I've speedily tagged it as G3. → Σ τ c. 00:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
WWE does let fans use and show off photos to websites for informational reasons and to show people that points of intrest in the shows. Tiffany Nicole Herrington ( talk) 02:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I've done the fair use reduction for this image. Can you please delete the original? Beyond My Ken ( talk) 03:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Also, I've been following the rather strange conversation on User talk:BruceWHain, but haven't commented there because (a) I have nothing to apologize for, and (b) I have no desire to stir things up. I am concerned, however, about what he plans to do when he comes off his block. I'm sure you were probably planning to anyway, but would you mind keeping Luchow's on your watchlist, and keeping a weather eye on it? It would be appreciated. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 23:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sowy for dowing that . I'm just jealous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jibberjabbermouth ( talk • contribs) 03:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank for the move and the note how to do it properly. MaroonGray213 ( talk) 03:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
C. Fred can you help?
I posted to Cue cat as I said I would. Once again Bbb23 undid my work as he has done to all other. But in the process of dismantleing my work he left out the Codie Ward for cue cat. Would you look over my links for the award and consider improving the file of cue cat on my behalf for the codie award? Seems, me being new and female is hurting me. Can you help improve the cue cat file? I have left the links and info in the discussion page. Thanks ProofPlus Professional Researcher 16:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
GUYS thank you so much for your help and guidance. I am trying to learn and will get better I promise. Now will start on some facts that are incorrect in the record. Thanks for your kind help. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 18:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC) I will get better I promise guys. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 18:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
I began over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisa Gabrielli and had a hard time believing that someone who has done so much over such a long time [6] could not be sourced. With a bit of research, I learned that this woman has a fist full of AKA, and under her many different psseudonyms her rather hefty career is imminently sourcable. [7] [8] [9] [10] The article's author was apparently too lazy, but the well has only just been tapped. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I mean this in the nicest of ways, but you need to stop bothering everyone and their personal edits. Most are constructive, however you are opinionated and feel they are not constructive. Do not forget that the idea of Wikipedia is a group effort, not your private project. You had better stop or I will need to report you to the board. 71.132.196.34 ( talk) 23:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey C. Fred, can you look at the Cue cat discussion and see the topic where Kbb23 and Cullen make the same edist to any and all records for digital convergence? Look up net talk live and cue cat. Seems weird to me that two different users make the same edits to different records totally but interconnect to the history of this company???/ ANy suggestions??? ProofPlus Professional Researcher 19:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
This person, Marco Safwat always tries to delete facts from this page, Qnet ltd, as he is trying advertise this company, as one of its IRs who tries to advertise his company, by just Copying its Profile information from its Website. I don't know how to report him, I'm just asking for an action as he's keeping deleting facts and posting his company's profile. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterjmikhail ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I have tagged Qnet ltd because it has multiple problems and is a mess. I described some of the problems on the talk page. Hopefully some discussion will take place there. My opinion is that most of it should be deleted and should not be on wikipedia.
KennethSides ( talk) 15:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. I only have a question, Can I know which source you found that is not considered a "reliable source"?? Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterjmikhail ( talk • contribs) 01:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Fred I know I am stumbling, and yes I say Kbb23 Cullens accusations, but I just warned them of liable with the words they attributed to an author, but was with that said.
I cannot for the life of me, figure out the links process. Can you help me?
I addded a statement by Ebay ceo, who licenses the scan commerce patents, and how ebay now has 56 million scan app users. Can you link it for me? I will send you a virtual coffee LOL
Any way here are the links:
Users confirmation: http://www.4-traders.com/EBAY-INC-4869/news/EBAY-INC-At-Industry-Conferences-eBay-Inc-s-CEO-John-Donahoe-Points-to-Major-Consumer-Shifts-13876819/ Second ceo ebay reference http://www.internetretailer.com/2011/11/03/smartphones-blur-line-between-stores-and-e-commerce
Link to ebay as licensee of patent portfolio http://www.rpxcorp.com/index.cfm?pageid=11
Sorry but I am learning and boy kbb23 is not playing nice ProofPlus Professional Researcher 20:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
Fred, thank you for your reply. RPX is the owner of the DigitalConvergence patents, see the uspto and the patents for inventor and digitalconvergence and you see they are owend by RPX and that is what RPX licenses to the 103 companies it list. SNIP>> Philyaw; Jeffry Jovan (Dallas, TX) Assignee: RPX-LV Acquisition LLC (Wilmington, DE)
Appl. No.: 09/614,937
SHORT LINK: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22Philyaw,+Jeffry+Jovan%22&OS="Philyaw,+Jeffry+Jovan"&RS="Philyaw,+Jeffry+Jovan"
Short version: Philyaw Inventor - DigitalConvergence 1st assignee, sold to LV, LV bought by RPX. PPXCORP.COM, they now license this portfolio and was there largest aquisition. Ebay, Micorsoft and other. RPX is also the citation needed for above in the article but I do not know how to do links yet. Thats why I turned to a mentor like you. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
ALL the records reflect: Assignee: RPX-LV Acquisition LLC (Wilmington, DE)
This is the LONG link for them all, but you have to click one by one: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=Philyaw%2C+Jeffry+Jovan&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs) 21:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
fred ALL of the wiki record on Cue cat mentions CRQ, the codes, the scanning and digital convergence AND YOU GUYS merged the record. So, one cannot be selective and say CUE CAT and thats software. They are one in the same. CRQ was the software and CUecat was ONE of 8 devices digital had. So, how can you NOW isolate CueCat. CUECAT CRQ DIGITALCONVERGENCE bar code reading ARE ALL IN THE RECORD and thus it is important and they ALL use the CRQ scan system. How can you pick it apart and and not see that? Will you please post up- the reference and help on this matter? we are all trying to improve the real record. please help ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
Please be fair on this Fred and help someone trying to make this one record better. Be fair. New people need help and heros not walls and judgements. I am really trying, but there is so much hate and bias in this record its unbearable. I am trying to be a great contributor and I am not glossing over the record, I am just putting the facts as they are. Please help and be a hero to a mom with frazzeled nerves already. I could really use a WIKI friend right about now. Please ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
FRED, bb23 adn Cullen CLEARLY posted that "jovan" was "conartstry" and "Psycho" and those statements are BOTH NOT ALLOWED and INFLAMATORY ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
A few years ago, we told you about Dallas' own Music Man, J. Jovan Philyaw ("Goodbye Kitty," June 6, 2001), the man behind the CueCat, Net Talk Live!, Tripledge Wipers and other testaments to his con-artistry. Now, Jovan has reinvented himself again--and this time, Buzz must say, he's really outdone himself, in the same entertainingly psycho way that Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf outdoes himself with each new press conference. ("There are no tanks. Oh, those tanks, the ones behind me? We have those tanks surrounded.")
Celeste, Eric. " Crystal Clear". Dallas Observer. 10 April 2003. Accessed 11 November 2011.
FRED STATS as to WHY the RPX issue and license is REAL VALID AND IMPORTANT:
On the article for cuecat the reference count are as follows:
13 references to cue cat as device
8 references to DigitalConvergence as company
22 references to the actual software and backend
12 references to the database actions
so, out of 55 references, 94% are about the software, company and database and YOU ASK WHY IS THE LICENSE IMPORTANT?
117 Patents and ONE is for CueCat the Device and 99.8% are about the software, backend and databsse functions and YOU ASK WHY THE LICENSE AND SUCH IS IMPORTANT TO THE RECORD?
Come on FRED. This is an encylopedia, you can just pick and choose what are facts!!!!
Please help me! ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
PLEASE UNDO YOUR UNDO ON THE REFERENCE TO LICENSE OF THE IP. I have proven my point beyond a shadow of a doubt and I need you to be fair and not make this an undo redo. Come on Fred, I have proven my case. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Proofplus (
talk •
contribs)
21:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
I keep seeing notes I did not sign right. IS it just ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC) of (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)) inside Parens??? I am confused so I have been doinw both
A. ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC) B (ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC))
which is right? Thanks my kind friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Fred and Jeff, I am doing the four tildes, but seems it keeps posting wrong. Got the tildes down but seems not to be showing right. Do I need to update something on my side to make it work right? Point me where to? ProofPlus Professional Researcher 21:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proofplus ( talk • contribs)
—'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]])
; that makes sure that my user and user talk pages are linked in my signature, as I have the treat-as-markup box checked. —
C.Fred (
talk)
21:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Edward Maclagan was the original title, to which umpteen articles were linked or redirected. However, that name was wrong. I could live with the article omitting the middle name - "Douglas" - but the capitalisation was also incorrect. It should have been "MacLagan", per the various books/official reports that he published. So, I moved Edward Maclagan to Edward Douglas MacLagan, fixed one obvious link problem related to Horace Arthur Rose ... and seem to have gotten myself in a right pickle.
I recall from something that you told me in the past (re: merging Patna University articles, IIRC) that a bot comes round and straightens out a lot of this stuff. But if you have the time then could you please check that I've done this correctly? There are so many permutations of the name, including "E. Maclagan", "E. D. Maclagan", "E. MacLagan", "E. D. MacLagan", "Edward Maclagan", "Edward MacLagan" ... you get my drift. I am not convinced that I have got this right, although I am convinced that the correct full name is Edward Douglas MacLagan & can point people to various published sources for verification thereof. - Sitush ( talk) 02:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello C Fred, I'm inquiring to discuss the deletion of The M Machine's page. You listed G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.madeevent.com/ElectricZoo/artists.php?REFID=madeweb. I was using that reference to cite The M Machine's presence at the Electric Zoo Festival, and double posted the same reference because I thought I hadn't saved the edit the first time. Can you help? Thanks! Dustinslush ( talk) 05:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustinslush ( talk • contribs) 04:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
That's the group's official bio, why can't that be in the wikipedia page? Sorry if I don't understand. Dustinslush ( talk) 23:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
I was wondering this: It appears that you have had to deal with some rogue IP's lately, and that temporary blocking was involved. If I ever come across a Wikipedian who is continually vandalizing articles, how do I warn them and eventually create a temporary block? I hope I never have to do this, but I should know. Mallen22 ( talk) 01:21, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
You might have had a simpler decision-making process on those Trina articles if you had looked here.— Kww( talk) 13:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
NoseyFruitcake3 ( talk) 19:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC) I am trying to upload an image but its freaking not working!
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(
talk)
19:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC) OK!
I am in the process of a draft article, and it is almost complete except the filmography and references section are not formatting correctly on screen even though they are on the edit page. Could you please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Fay_Wolf and see if you can fix that error? Thanks! Also, this is my first article, so please give some feedback. - Mallen22 ( talk) 01:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
|}
on it: that marked the table as ended and made it display in the filmography section.<ref>
tags in the article, so there's nothing to pull down into references. Because of this, if the article went live, it would be subject to an immediate proposed deletion: all biographies of living people must have references. —
C.Fred (
talk)
02:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Hello,
Regarding your comments on the school anthem, I shall work on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRSM_Terendak
Shahrulazwad ( talk) 06:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Your contribution is encouraged. Mangoe ( talk) 18:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Vinnie is back, claiming UFO researcher help.... Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 20:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Please would you ask your fellow editors to stop writing nonsense about "vandalism" on my page. I added a verified helpful comment to an article. It was meant to warn the public of the risks of using a particular "cashback" site. In return I am called a vandal. These editors obviously have some strong emotional (or financial) link to the subject matter and regard other's contributions as NPOV.
I would like to remind you and other editors that Vandalism is: The conduct or spirit characteristic of, or attributed to, the Vandals in respect of culture; ruthless destruction or spoiling of anything beautiful or venerable; in weakened sense, barbarous, ignorant, or inartistic treatment. OED These editors are the culprits: Favonian, Barek, Bwilkins, Calabe1992
Their actions are authoritarian and only serve to alienate normal users of Wikipedia. Even more so than that picture of Jimmy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fghgfhgfhgfh ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the first comment. Neologism and Brown Thursday. When is it considered non neologism? How many pages must be populated, how many newscasters must use the word before it is not neologism?
Regarding the second comment.. who... That is why I included the link to the google search, there are several people (mostly common citizens), myself included.
Please work with me, in improving my article as it is my first, instead of deleating it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pesnider ( talk • contribs) 22:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
I see your comments and will edit the article and add references, but it is going to be later tonight. I see that I have approximately 7 days to get the article where it needs to be or else it will be deleted. Thank you for working with me, and offering suggestions. Regarding the who, can I just use a source online, or can I say friends of user:pesnider. I can post a poll through survery monkey and get results over the next few days. What qualifies as the who? Can I simply say me? Thank you for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pesnider ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#MangoWong Block review - Sitush ( talk) 03:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
This is for adding an edit summary to Seventh-Day Adventist Church, so I understand the purpose of the removal of the category. "Oh, that makes perfect sense!" 78.26 ( talk) 01:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
Your note was very timely and correct and is much appreciated. Thanks - Youreallycan ( talk) 01:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred,
Why are you always undoing my edits on transfer factors? How can the source of Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR.net) be considered a vague source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.10.11 ( talk) 02:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C. Fred,
Thanks for sending me the message on links. I was unsure where I could contribute the information on the SAE initiation ritual. I'm unsure if my other most recent edits were ok, but I included the ritual as a reference to what I had. I have other references if that's ok as well. I'm just trying to make the article content more comprehensive. Thanks! SAEAlum ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC).
Could you have a quick look editor just reverted on UKIP thanks, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/08aviee Mo ainm ~Talk 18:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
It was right to begin with. I knew it was not the first toll road in the state when I created the article, and don't know how that got changed. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, I do not want to cause any kind of trouble but...how come my page was deleted? Every single part of it was true you know...Me and my mate we do a web show and we thought people might want to see information about it. We beg of you to let it back up. Thanks.
Robbie 5001 ( talk) 08:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, could you have a look at Zang-Hee Cho? Having spent some time this morning doing a bit of fixing of the unreferenced biography of Ryong Ryoo created by the same user, the style of the Zang-Hee Cho article set my antennae twiching. Particularly given your comment on the User talk page re the copyright infringement of two other articles (which I didn't register until after I'd done the work on the Roo article). I have tried to check both the Roo article and Zang-Hee Cho for evidence of copyright infringement but I'm coming up blank. They both look like copy and paste to me but I can't spot the source. Doesn't appear to be the same as the others (unless I'm being dense). Subject appears notable enough, so the article could be stubbed. Don't want to do any more on this before someone with rather more experience has a look. -- CharlieDelta ( talk) 10:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
re this [11] I think you meant Big Brother 01 (UK). Leaky Caldron 20:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
why did you delete that page? it meant alot and now its gone... thanks alot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.119.113.60 ( talk) 04:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if France airs it first. Canada is still the country of originality, and since the show is Canadian, only the Canadian airdates will be shown. Even though Australia aired TDWT first, the Australian airdates are not in the infobox. So yeah, time is not a manner, it's originality. Yes, we might get all the episode information right before the show even airs on Canada, but note that the infobox says "Original Run" which means that we are still going to put everything as it is airing in Canada. :) Giggett ( talk) 01:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Quicklinks to WikiProjects(Wiktionary, WikiNews etc) are needed on Wikipedia and vice-versa, in the header or on the left-margin column. Please consider including these to the existing links for the convenience of users navigation from one project to another. Rockin291 ( talk) 15:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice regarding the article on Qnet ltd, I will try my best to edit the article to make it more informative and written from a more neutral point of view and maybe include some of the supporting points of view. But I believe this will be better done by other members as I am currently opposed to the way the company operates in my country Mohehab ( talk) 16:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. Rubinkumar ( talk) 23:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Asking if You Like Selena Gomez |
Do you like Selena Gomez? I know I do! =P ★♛iluvselenagomez1234♛★ ( talk) 17:12, 17 December 2011 (UTC) |
With these edits, an editor has done a good thing, namely, adding a free use photo of the subject of an article where there had been none before. However, in the article itself, there is a lot of wiki markup showing around the picture (not in the editing window, in the article itself). This is not my area; is this something you can easily fix, or at least, direct someone to Bart Starr who does know how to fix it? 74.178.230.234 ( talk) 20:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey! I have almost got my first article down, except I cannot get references right! I read the article on how to do them, how to use ref tags, etc. I formatted it correctly, too, but it only shows 1, 2, and 3 instead of the name of the reference. Please help! I really need it. Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Fay_Wolf and please fix this! Thanks. - Mallen22 ( talk) 04:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
on my talk page. 74.178.230.234 ( talk) 04:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, saw that my article regarding The Alternates was deleted. I checked the band guidelines for Wikipedia and The Alternates fit the criteria to submit the article, they have notablitity. How can I not have the article deleted if I resubmit? Any suggestions? -- DavidSCastro ( talk) 21:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
I notice that you have recently edited Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 and would like to make you aware that I'm seeking consensus on the article on the talk page . -- Mrmatiko ( talk) 09:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Please Stop Adding Speedy Deletion Notices As You Did With Whimsical Ponies. Just Because You Don't Know About It Doesn't Mean It Is False. You Want Me To Add References? Fine. Also, Why Don't YOU Do Some Research. Google Is A Thing Of A Breakthrough.
Love,
GenghisKhan12 ( talk) 03:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
C.Fred, I Thank You Kindly For Branding My Page With A Speedy Deletion Tag, Resulting In The Deletion Of My Page. Now That I Think Of It, Thank You For At Least Giving Me A Chance To Present References And Demonstrate The Importance Of The Page. It's Not As If The Page Was Speedily Deleted Before I Could Add A Section About The Importance Of The Article. I Think What You Are Doing Is A Good Deed To Humanity, For I Believe That You Do Know Everything About Everything, And If You Have Never Heard About It Before, Then It Musn't Be True! I Especially Love The Fact That You Threaten People On Their Talk Pages With "Just So You Know" Information. It's Not As If The Whimsical Ponies Page Was Of Any Importance. It Was Probably All A Joke. Once Again, Thank You For Recognizing The Insignificance Of A Small Business That Has Grown To Something Beautiful.
Love, GenghisKhan12 ( talk) 03:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Please have a look on iTunes, which is exactly the season-order in which Nick airs the show, and there you can see that "Blooptorious" is S02E13 & "A Christmas Tori" is S03E01! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dupewrest ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fred,
This is regarding Somavanshi Kshytriya page in Wiki, There are many articles in Wikipedia which have large portions of text un-cited, unverifiable. Still these articles exist.
This page existed in wiki since a long time as long as 2008, until recently when it was deleted. I have cited notable people. The map showing where people exist. The mention of the community in religious text and books. What more is needed? why are you so persistent on deleting this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninadraut123 ( talk • contribs) 03:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)