![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
First thank you for the cup of joe! Second and most importantly, thank you for mediating on the article, German acupuncture trials. I am just placing a note on participants of the talk page to let them know I have changed several header titles. They previously consisted of a UserName and I felt that was not really in keeping with WP policy/guidelines and not likely to increase collegiality and help build consensus. I really appreciate your input, it has helped me develop my concept of encyclopedic paraphrasing. Nice looking hamster BTW. Best wishes. - - MrBill3 ( talk) 09:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Best wishes |
for the holidays and 2014 from a warmer place than where you probably are ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 11:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
Seasonal Greetings |
Visitor7 ( talk) 20:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Victuallers
talkback is wishing BR Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote
WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. -
Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same |
Just wanted to say: Good editing today at Fredrik Stanton and the book article! Pleasure working with a conscientious editor — even with a half-year lag time! : ) Best wishes for a happy holiday season. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 15:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Please see my comment on the talk page -- tagging without participating in an ongoing discussion is pointless. On the other hand, your participation in the discussion would be valuable. Thanks. -- JBL ( talk) 16:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Concerning your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grady Hall, would you look at the references I found and have added to the article, and tell me if you still believe it should be deleted? He has been interviewed for his work, and his work has won notable awards. Dream Focus 19:58, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Made a few changes to the text you added here [1]. Typically I fill in the refs so formatted them to fit with the rest of the article. Also simplified it and reworded terms like "patient" per WP:MEDMOS. Hope all is well. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year to you! Are you going to keep on mediating at the GERAC article? I had a short break over the holidays, but it seems like QG is getting a little frustrated... Maybe you can take a glance at this [ [2]]. I'd appreciate it if you could return to the article. -- Mallexikon ( talk) 02:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks, friend! I hope to see you in London! :) Pundit| utter 16:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Lane,
I just wanted to make sure that you knew about meta:Category:Best practices in public outreach in case any of it is useful for your outreach work. Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 20:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Would you like to participate in the January 2014 Seattle meetup virtually? We will meet on Saturday, January 11 at 6pm. If you can participate please sign on the talk page and install Skype. Hope to see you at the meeting. -- Pine ✉ 02:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I notice that you redirected Nerve pain to Neuralgia the other day. Do you have any other thoughts about that page? It seems odd to me to have that search term redirect to a rare disease page that doesn't mention other forms of nerve pain, like Sciatica or carpal tunnel syndrome. What are you thoughts? @ Anthonyhcole:, do you have any suggestions? WhatamIdoing ( talk) 00:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Climate change. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
Please note: this notice is given in an advisory capacity and does not imply any wrongdoing on your part.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
15:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm doing it by hitting the "enable feedback" button on the left side of the articles. It helps me know what readers think of !my articles.— indopug ( talk) 16:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Nice to meet you; I do the weekly Top 25 report for Wikipedia articles, and its cousin, the Traffic Report at the Signpost. One of the things I have to do is determine which articles are genuinely popular and which are due to botnets, and one of the ways to determine this (we think) is that bots tend to surge for one day and then disappear, whereas people tend to leave a taper on the view stats. Serendi pod ous 15:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Lane, someone has twice changed the text in Template:Open access navbox which explains the concept 'libre'. I'm not sure why but I don't want to get into an edit war over something like that, so if you were to leave a comment on the talk page about it that might be useful. Hope you're well - Lawsonstu ( talk) 20:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Category:Lists of scientists known for opposing a mainstream scientific assessment, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jinkinson talk to me 04:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Devyani Khobragade incident". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 05:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Funny, there's no mention of racism against Miss world(who was indian) either, talking about the page Racism in the United States, even though it gets over [ 30k views per month]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bladesmulti ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
I am reading up on Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine), because I am working on an article on Invisalign in my COI capacity, which will probably have 1-2 sub-sections on efficacy that would fall under medical claims. I was wondering if it would be ok if I asked for your input now and then on the policy as I am not experienced in that area. CorporateM ( Talk) 02:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Ok, last question (I think). Do you have any tips on how to access some of these sources? Some of the books/studies cost hundreds of dollars to access. One hundred consecutive Invisalign cases analysed is cited about 4-5 times in the current article, but I can't find a way to get access to the full-text. I could easily pay over one-thousand dollars if I paid the price for the sources I need. CorporateM ( Talk) 20:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Several noticeable improvements to the EducationProgram extension (in addition to some small bug fixes) will go live on or around 2014-01-23:
Notifications
Special:Contributions student notice
Adding articles
Adding students
If you have feedback about these new features, or other questions or ideas related to course pages, please let me know! --
Sage Ross (WMF) (
talk)
18:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Subscribe or unsubscribe from future Wikipedia Education Program technical updates.
Following up on your suggestion at my talk page, there's now a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 122#Streamlining page moves over redirects?. And thanks for the suggestion! (Cute hamster, almost as ferocious as a Sminthopsis.) Sminthopsis84 ( talk) 19:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
How do i remove my blocked because it is been a long time since i opened it , as i know ,the block would only last up to two weeks, (is?) it ha been 4 months since i opened my account here , Can you give an information to removed this ? i blocked by a user:Obsidian Soul?? thank you
and Ps; Can you give me an information how to give a proper license for my Multimedia uploads so it would be delete here, as what happend in the pic of Asian peoples (which i spend weeks to create) just deleted for the single issue, there was a part which is a from stamp.
so once again thanks you !— Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 08:19, 24 January 2014
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
First thank you for the cup of joe! Second and most importantly, thank you for mediating on the article, German acupuncture trials. I am just placing a note on participants of the talk page to let them know I have changed several header titles. They previously consisted of a UserName and I felt that was not really in keeping with WP policy/guidelines and not likely to increase collegiality and help build consensus. I really appreciate your input, it has helped me develop my concept of encyclopedic paraphrasing. Nice looking hamster BTW. Best wishes. - - MrBill3 ( talk) 09:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Best wishes |
for the holidays and 2014 from a warmer place than where you probably are ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 11:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
Seasonal Greetings |
Visitor7 ( talk) 20:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Victuallers
talkback is wishing BR Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote
WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. -
Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same |
Just wanted to say: Good editing today at Fredrik Stanton and the book article! Pleasure working with a conscientious editor — even with a half-year lag time! : ) Best wishes for a happy holiday season. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 15:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Please see my comment on the talk page -- tagging without participating in an ongoing discussion is pointless. On the other hand, your participation in the discussion would be valuable. Thanks. -- JBL ( talk) 16:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Concerning your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grady Hall, would you look at the references I found and have added to the article, and tell me if you still believe it should be deleted? He has been interviewed for his work, and his work has won notable awards. Dream Focus 19:58, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Made a few changes to the text you added here [1]. Typically I fill in the refs so formatted them to fit with the rest of the article. Also simplified it and reworded terms like "patient" per WP:MEDMOS. Hope all is well. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year to you! Are you going to keep on mediating at the GERAC article? I had a short break over the holidays, but it seems like QG is getting a little frustrated... Maybe you can take a glance at this [ [2]]. I'd appreciate it if you could return to the article. -- Mallexikon ( talk) 02:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks, friend! I hope to see you in London! :) Pundit| utter 16:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Lane,
I just wanted to make sure that you knew about meta:Category:Best practices in public outreach in case any of it is useful for your outreach work. Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 20:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Would you like to participate in the January 2014 Seattle meetup virtually? We will meet on Saturday, January 11 at 6pm. If you can participate please sign on the talk page and install Skype. Hope to see you at the meeting. -- Pine ✉ 02:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I notice that you redirected Nerve pain to Neuralgia the other day. Do you have any other thoughts about that page? It seems odd to me to have that search term redirect to a rare disease page that doesn't mention other forms of nerve pain, like Sciatica or carpal tunnel syndrome. What are you thoughts? @ Anthonyhcole:, do you have any suggestions? WhatamIdoing ( talk) 00:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Climate change. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
Please note: this notice is given in an advisory capacity and does not imply any wrongdoing on your part.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
15:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm doing it by hitting the "enable feedback" button on the left side of the articles. It helps me know what readers think of !my articles.— indopug ( talk) 16:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Nice to meet you; I do the weekly Top 25 report for Wikipedia articles, and its cousin, the Traffic Report at the Signpost. One of the things I have to do is determine which articles are genuinely popular and which are due to botnets, and one of the ways to determine this (we think) is that bots tend to surge for one day and then disappear, whereas people tend to leave a taper on the view stats. Serendi pod ous 15:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Lane, someone has twice changed the text in Template:Open access navbox which explains the concept 'libre'. I'm not sure why but I don't want to get into an edit war over something like that, so if you were to leave a comment on the talk page about it that might be useful. Hope you're well - Lawsonstu ( talk) 20:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Category:Lists of scientists known for opposing a mainstream scientific assessment, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jinkinson talk to me 04:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Devyani Khobragade incident". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 05:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Funny, there's no mention of racism against Miss world(who was indian) either, talking about the page Racism in the United States, even though it gets over [ 30k views per month]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bladesmulti ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
I am reading up on Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine), because I am working on an article on Invisalign in my COI capacity, which will probably have 1-2 sub-sections on efficacy that would fall under medical claims. I was wondering if it would be ok if I asked for your input now and then on the policy as I am not experienced in that area. CorporateM ( Talk) 02:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Ok, last question (I think). Do you have any tips on how to access some of these sources? Some of the books/studies cost hundreds of dollars to access. One hundred consecutive Invisalign cases analysed is cited about 4-5 times in the current article, but I can't find a way to get access to the full-text. I could easily pay over one-thousand dollars if I paid the price for the sources I need. CorporateM ( Talk) 20:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Several noticeable improvements to the EducationProgram extension (in addition to some small bug fixes) will go live on or around 2014-01-23:
Notifications
Special:Contributions student notice
Adding articles
Adding students
If you have feedback about these new features, or other questions or ideas related to course pages, please let me know! --
Sage Ross (WMF) (
talk)
18:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Subscribe or unsubscribe from future Wikipedia Education Program technical updates.
Following up on your suggestion at my talk page, there's now a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 122#Streamlining page moves over redirects?. And thanks for the suggestion! (Cute hamster, almost as ferocious as a Sminthopsis.) Sminthopsis84 ( talk) 19:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
How do i remove my blocked because it is been a long time since i opened it , as i know ,the block would only last up to two weeks, (is?) it ha been 4 months since i opened my account here , Can you give an information to removed this ? i blocked by a user:Obsidian Soul?? thank you
and Ps; Can you give me an information how to give a proper license for my Multimedia uploads so it would be delete here, as what happend in the pic of Asian peoples (which i spend weeks to create) just deleted for the single issue, there was a part which is a from stamp.
so once again thanks you !— Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipandrew ( talk • contribs) 08:19, 24 January 2014