This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
At Talk:Polish Underground State, could you explain in more detail why this article is not yet up to B-class for MILHIST? Thanks, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Abraham, I've incorporated your comments into the Cologne War, still on A-review at Mil History. Would you take another look? Auntieruth55 ( talk) 17:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 06:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 07:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Daniel Case ( talk) 13:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey! I'm interested in the military history project and I saw that you were one of the coordinators. How do I join? What specific areas do you need people to work in? Cheers! -- Reubzz ( talk) 20:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up
here, read up on the rules
here, and discuss the contest
here!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 17:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||
|
New featured articles:
New featured lists: New featured portals: New featured pictures:
New A-Class articles: | ||
| |||
| |||
| |||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 17:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
As a past WP:FOUR awardee you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Four Award.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 19:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I've put some designs on the contest talkpage (at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history/World_War_I_task_force/Contest#Designs). EyeSerene talk 12:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Auntieruth55 ( talk) 16:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi there; can you check to see if your concerns were resolved at the above FLC? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
... for this edit. Pdfpdf ( talk) 13:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Be happy to. I nearly missed your post in the ANI annex that my talkpage becomes sometimes :) EyeSerene talk 10:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello there. I just thought I'd drop you a quick line to let you know that I've moved the above article from Henry Wells (general). I've been on a bit of a spree, trying to standardise disambiguators for military officers (I know, I know - very OCD). No real issue there - most are in the "<insert service> officer" form anyway - but when I noticed that I was mucking about with an FA I thought the least I could to was to let you know.
Best wishes, Xdamr talk 23:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
FYI: Regarding this edit - The title to the table says "The following Australians have held the rank of Lieutenant General". If you are going to add Squires, then you also need to add Hutton, and change the title of the table. Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 14:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I think there's a problem with the MILHIST contest page as most of the entries for November have disappeared. You made the last change, so I thought that I'd let you know about it rather than revert it myself.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 20:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
(Move log); 12:23 . . Abraham, B.S. (Talk | contribs) moved Alfred John Shout to Alfred Shout over redirect (per naming convention, as middle name is not necessary for disambiguation)
Good!
Pdfpdf (
talk) 10:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Hey! I'd like to add a medals section to other articles, using a similar format/layout/whatever to the one that you did for Maxwell. Are you OK with that? Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm up to my neck at the moment (IRL), but around Thursday this week it should start to ease off for a few days so, yep, by the 10th or very soon after you should see some action :) Don't hesitate to nag if it looks like I'm not on the case - you're neither pushy or a pain, and helping you out is a pleasure. All the best, EyeSerene talk 14:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks very much :) I noticed you'd changed a few things back - no problems with that, but you've reintroduced a couple of grammatical errors:
All the best with the FAC! EyeSerene talk 09:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, had a class to teach... I hadn't quite finished; some more:
Hope this helps, and of course it's your call :) FWIW I agree with "lobbed" for grenades - in that context it's a kind of specialist term - but I've been involved in some unusually tough FA reviews recently with, for example, one reviewer objecting to "knocked out" for tanks. To be honest I'm a little hacked off with the whole FAC process, but don't let me put you off! All the best, EyeSerene talk 11:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 03:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
| |||
|
New featured articles:
New featured pictures: New A-Class articles: | ||
| |||
| |||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 03:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! You commented at the peer review for List of Brigade of Gurkhas recipients of the Victoria Cross. This list is currently a featured list candidate, with the page located at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Brigade of Gurkhas recipients of the Victoria Cross/archive1. Your comments at the peer review were appreciated, and any further comments you have on the FLC would also be appreciated. Thanks in advance if you have the time to drop by! Dana boomer ( talk) 00:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
You are one of the twelve editors advancing into the second round of the Henry Allingham World War I Contest. The second round started at 00:00, 29 December and ends 23:59, 31 January. The top six ranked players at the end of this stage will advance into the final round of the contest so keep up the good work! -- Eurocopter ( talk) 00:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Our spirited discussion about Roderic Dallas led me to look more deeply into this hero; I want to thank you for that, as I find him a fascinating subject and a much under-rated/unnoticed aerial combat leader. If I were a World War I ace in a previous incarnation in anyone's air force, I believe I would rather be flying Dallas's wing than the Red Baron's. My chances of survival would have been better, and I probably would have enjoyed my ground duties more in a Dallas squadron.
I hope you will take a look at the present day article; I believe you will like what you see. I continue to seek more material via interlibrary loan to round it out a bit more.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 04:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
At Talk:Polish Underground State, could you explain in more detail why this article is not yet up to B-class for MILHIST? Thanks, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Abraham, I've incorporated your comments into the Cologne War, still on A-review at Mil History. Would you take another look? Auntieruth55 ( talk) 17:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 06:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 07:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Daniel Case ( talk) 13:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey! I'm interested in the military history project and I saw that you were one of the coordinators. How do I join? What specific areas do you need people to work in? Cheers! -- Reubzz ( talk) 20:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up
here, read up on the rules
here, and discuss the contest
here!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 17:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||
|
New featured articles:
New featured lists: New featured portals: New featured pictures:
New A-Class articles: | ||
| |||
| |||
| |||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 17:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
As a past WP:FOUR awardee you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Four Award.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 19:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I've put some designs on the contest talkpage (at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history/World_War_I_task_force/Contest#Designs). EyeSerene talk 12:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Auntieruth55 ( talk) 16:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi there; can you check to see if your concerns were resolved at the above FLC? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
... for this edit. Pdfpdf ( talk) 13:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Be happy to. I nearly missed your post in the ANI annex that my talkpage becomes sometimes :) EyeSerene talk 10:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello there. I just thought I'd drop you a quick line to let you know that I've moved the above article from Henry Wells (general). I've been on a bit of a spree, trying to standardise disambiguators for military officers (I know, I know - very OCD). No real issue there - most are in the "<insert service> officer" form anyway - but when I noticed that I was mucking about with an FA I thought the least I could to was to let you know.
Best wishes, Xdamr talk 23:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
FYI: Regarding this edit - The title to the table says "The following Australians have held the rank of Lieutenant General". If you are going to add Squires, then you also need to add Hutton, and change the title of the table. Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 14:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I think there's a problem with the MILHIST contest page as most of the entries for November have disappeared. You made the last change, so I thought that I'd let you know about it rather than revert it myself.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 20:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
(Move log); 12:23 . . Abraham, B.S. (Talk | contribs) moved Alfred John Shout to Alfred Shout over redirect (per naming convention, as middle name is not necessary for disambiguation)
Good!
Pdfpdf (
talk) 10:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Hey! I'd like to add a medals section to other articles, using a similar format/layout/whatever to the one that you did for Maxwell. Are you OK with that? Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm up to my neck at the moment (IRL), but around Thursday this week it should start to ease off for a few days so, yep, by the 10th or very soon after you should see some action :) Don't hesitate to nag if it looks like I'm not on the case - you're neither pushy or a pain, and helping you out is a pleasure. All the best, EyeSerene talk 14:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks very much :) I noticed you'd changed a few things back - no problems with that, but you've reintroduced a couple of grammatical errors:
All the best with the FAC! EyeSerene talk 09:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, had a class to teach... I hadn't quite finished; some more:
Hope this helps, and of course it's your call :) FWIW I agree with "lobbed" for grenades - in that context it's a kind of specialist term - but I've been involved in some unusually tough FA reviews recently with, for example, one reviewer objecting to "knocked out" for tanks. To be honest I'm a little hacked off with the whole FAC process, but don't let me put you off! All the best, EyeSerene talk 11:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 03:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
| |||
|
New featured articles:
New featured pictures: New A-Class articles: | ||
| |||
| |||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 03:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! You commented at the peer review for List of Brigade of Gurkhas recipients of the Victoria Cross. This list is currently a featured list candidate, with the page located at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Brigade of Gurkhas recipients of the Victoria Cross/archive1. Your comments at the peer review were appreciated, and any further comments you have on the FLC would also be appreciated. Thanks in advance if you have the time to drop by! Dana boomer ( talk) 00:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
You are one of the twelve editors advancing into the second round of the Henry Allingham World War I Contest. The second round started at 00:00, 29 December and ends 23:59, 31 January. The top six ranked players at the end of this stage will advance into the final round of the contest so keep up the good work! -- Eurocopter ( talk) 00:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Our spirited discussion about Roderic Dallas led me to look more deeply into this hero; I want to thank you for that, as I find him a fascinating subject and a much under-rated/unnoticed aerial combat leader. If I were a World War I ace in a previous incarnation in anyone's air force, I believe I would rather be flying Dallas's wing than the Red Baron's. My chances of survival would have been better, and I probably would have enjoyed my ground duties more in a Dallas squadron.
I hope you will take a look at the present day article; I believe you will like what you see. I continue to seek more material via interlibrary loan to round it out a bit more.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 04:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |