This is a subpage of 331dot's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Hey 331dot:
I appreciate you participating in my changes. I am concerned that you erased everything I wrote. The wiki page I encountered was sorely underdone, lacking a lot of details, and lacking references. I provided extensive references for my additions. I am concerned that you didn't make minor edits, rather than erase all my input. Please discuss this in 'talk' with me rather than erase entire paragraphs. I made a number of updates to the 2020 Maine Senate Election, including recent topics relevant to the election that I thought were those most relevant. I hope we can resolve our editorial differences amicably rather than report vandalism.
Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4A00:4FE0:DD21:22D7:53C0:A906 ( talk) 18:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello: The is a source from Maine News Center. It has two references to this article. What do you mean there is no reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.116.143 ( talk) 21:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
You mentioned citation, not me. Moreover, this has nothing to do with providing unfactual or erroneous material about a living person.
These are the facts as reported by various Maine and national media:
1. Information was submitted sometime in the first half of 2018 to Maine authorities that rep. Bates was accused of underage sexual behavior with girls where he teaches (an all-girls school in Maine). 2. Gideon did not call for his removal or investigate. 3. The Bollard magazine published additional allegations. 4. Gideon, in response to the publication, asked for him to resign. 5. Bates resigned. 6. House rep. Sutton brought an ethics vote against Gideon for improper handling of the situation. 7. The House voted along party lines to reject the vote.
I welcome any additional facts, things I am missing. But, again, this is an important aspect of the campaign, just as the two candidates positions, controversial or otherwise. But I will not have you continue undoing the contribution for specious reasons. People have said it is unsourced (untrue). I sourced them. Then you say it is not factual (clearly false). Then others have said it is irrelevant, and uses bizarre language. These reasons are bordering on the absurd, and again, I will raise the concern of vandalism once again. You need to say specifically just what is unfactual or inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4A00:4FE0:9479:6E32:CFCF:841 ( talk) 03:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Here are a few of the references:
Also, did you 331dot erase the talk page about this from the 2020 Maine Senate page? I can't find it anymore. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2601:681:4A00:4FE0:9479:6E32:CFCF:841 (
talk)
03:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
I didn't say you were paid; I asked, given your persistence in repeatedly undoing my edits after I make the improvements you ask for.
WP:BLP: Yes, I agree about using neutral language, heavily referencing, etc. But having a vote on someone for a potential ethics violation as Speaker of the Maine House, 51-72 is something to mention.
Your conclusions are also specious: be more circumspect in your inferences. I am not sympathetic with Senator Collins, nor am I against Speaker Gideon. I believe that important, well-sourced references to key events expand knowledge. I fear you are motivated to protect Gideon, which is not acceptable.
As to your conclusion about Fredette: he said they didn't likely have enough votes, and, once Bates quit, that this was something they could move on from. It doesn't mean it wasn't a significant event.
I'm happy to pare down the blurb, but to suppress it and not allow it is wrong, unethical, and partisan.
Who said: 'potentially not handling it well'? She had 51 people vote that her handling of it was unethical. Trump wasn't convicted, but he still had a substantial minority of people vote to impeach him. That is noteworthy even though he is a living person.
I have given a very clear, fact-based account of what happened. You have not. You still have failed to explain which of any of the facts I cited which are inaccurate.
I welcome any additional facts, things I am missing. But, again, this is an important aspect of the campaign, just as the two candidates positions, controversial or otherwise. But I will not have you continue undoing the contribution for incorrect reasons. First you say it is unsourced (untrue). Then you say it is not factual (clearly false). Then you say it is irrelevant, and uses bizarre language. Your reasons are bordering on the absurd, and again, I will raise the concern of vandalism once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4A00:4FE0:9479:6E32:CFCF:841 ( talk) 03:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Here are a few of the references:
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for your help.. i appreciate it. Milestoneinstitute ( talk) 08:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC) |
Hello 331dot,
I got a notification about you suspecting my publication as a spam,advertising or promotion. I am reaching out to you after reading all the guidelines of Advertising, marketing or public relations and do not believe that I have violated any of the guidelines. However,since we (me and my teammates) are new here would like to know and learn what needs to be submitted with our information to validate the information. We would be more than happy to submit any documentation if needed. Once again I do understand that we must have done some error but with you guiding me I am sure we can fix it.
Many thanks,
Ojas Joshi. Ojasjosh ( talk) 09:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)ojasjosh
Sorry if I seemed to be cutting across you at User talk:DeweyDecimalLansky, but I was concerned that they could just sit out the 48-hour block and then be editing freely with the legal threats still standing. -- RexxS ( talk) 00:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi 331dot. Can you look at Special:Contributions/2604:6000:CCC8:2800:F557:99D3:40BD:59F5 if you're online at the moment? I've already warned them twice and posted at WP:AIV, but I have a feeling they're not going to stop until somebody stops them. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 09:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. You around? Kindly ping while replying. —usernamekiran (talk) 08:42, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I want to retrieve deleted material for further editing. how can i get the page text back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linaotboga ( talk • contribs) 12:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
I use the services of the company — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linaotboga ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do the honors here, i also recommend salting. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, hope you are doing well. I see that you salted Bilal Abbas Khan in 2018 due to repeated recreations by Pakistanpedia. Since the actor is now WP-notable, but has his article at Bilal Abbas instead, could you please create a redirect to the latter? Thanks, M Imtiaz ( talk · contribs) 15:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
It looks like User:152.32.113.96 created User:Kyere314 and kept on vandalizing. Fountains of Bryn Mawr ( talk) 15:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand the question about what is my motivation to help artists? I can ask the same questions from Wikipedia helpers? What does motivate you to help me or others?! I think that's how we help each other to grow and to make information accessible to the public. I do editing books in my free time and nobody is asking me why I help to edit the books, with due all respect please let me know also who is a notable person in your opinion? Bahman Tavoosi as a young filmmaker has been recognized by international media and film festivals, how could he not be a notable person? It was easier in the past to edit Wikipedia but I find it more difficult to help Wikipedia nowadays. Regards Inception 111 ( talk) 22:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)inception 111 [1]
Thanks for your prompt reply, I don't wish to recite our own interest when it comes to art. I have my own reasons to follow people or help any artist that not yet promoted, in this case, of course, I have seen the films and saw his talks but yes I would love to help artists ( as in my small community I do), same as you do for the humanity as a whole, but we try to help Wikipedia to put the puzzles together to make it whole. As an artist, I know how important it is to be recognized especially in the film industry and that's my whole motivation. Now that I am retired would like to contribute more to that if it doesn't become too much of a hassle. As for being a notable person, I hope you had a chance to look at the information that is provided on his page, he has plenty of sources which are listed on his page. Thank you for your attention.
Inception 111 (
talk)
23:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)inception 111
[2]
You said here that the subject should confirm their identity. However, identity verification via OTRS is only necessary if the user is blocked under Template:Uw-ublock-wellknown. Sam-2727 ( talk) 20:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.18.58.163 ( talk) 12:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not super important but I was wondering if you saw the email I forwarded to you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 14:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
May I ask why you blocked
User:Chevytrucks=? Was there any reason beyond the the user name? that is not actually the name of a company, although it does strongly suggest the company, and that user did not do any promotional editing, that I can see. Why was not the user warning message about an inappropriate user name sufficient. If you felt that a block was essential, why not use the {{
Uw-ublock}} or better {{
Uw-softerblock}} both of which say that the user name is the sole or primary reason for the block, and both of which specifically invite the user to request a change of username along with the unblock? All the user had doen was star the Wikipeedia adventure. Please remember that our rules for usernames are nowhere explained during the registration process, so how is a new user to know that a name is considered a violation? Saying thst the user name ...is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia
as {{
uw-uhblock}} does seems to me over the line of
WP:BITE. Am I missing some fact which would lead to a stricter block?
DES
(talk)
DESiegel Contribs
20:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, 331dot. Thank you so much for removing the block!
I will once again apologize to Mr. Drat8sub on his talk page. thank you for helping me. Thank you.
BRICK93 ( talk) 23:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
They seem to get upset if insisting he is notable does not work. I have failed to convince them. Maybe you will achieve it. I hope so. Fiddle Faddle 22:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
I know that :Charlotte Crosby is blocked only from editing Wikipedia,but since I is account too,whenever I open Wikipedia using his account, t says 'unavailable'.Please lift the block and solve this problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr VeduFIFA ( talk • contribs) 10:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Block review request. Thank you.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk)
18:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Howdy. TBH, I think a compromise of collapsed infoboxes (see Frank Sinatra), would gradually end the passions around the topic :) GoodDay ( talk) 00:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Can an autoconfirmed user move my draft to article space immediately? Is that advisable? Or should I wait for my draft to be reviewed? I was hoping you guys could help me move it? Thanks.
MediaManager1 ( talk) 08:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the prompt reply! Sorry, I submitted my draft for Article Creation befor I received your message. Can I still submit this draft for review even after submitting it to be created as a live article?
And how can I know if someone is an independent editor? Can an independent editor help me move my draft to article space if he or she is autoconfirmed? MediaManager1 ( talk) 08:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the reply. Also, I replied to someone regarding sockpuppetry accusation.
I would like to share my reply with you, too: "Yes, you are correct. I was EditorManagerPH before I was MediaManagerPH, because when I signed up as EditorManagerPH, I didn't realize that I would be logged out. I forgot the password I used, because I thought I wouldn't get locked out, and figured I could change it in the future. But when I couldn't get back in because of multiple wrong passwords, I just created a new one. There was no bad intention or malicious reasons behind it. It was simply ignorance on my part. Now, I am logged in for 365 days on Wikipedia, and made sure I remember my password. Hope this clarifies it, and get the Wikipedians to be lenient as I have been very forthcoming about this issue. Thank you.😊"
MediaManager1 ( talk) 09:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Please block Special:Contributions/118.137.248.125 -- WikiBayer ( talk) 09:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Can you please help me to make changes on my company Article Syedmehmood11 ( talk) 10:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
How can i make a company Page?? Like others company haved Syedmehmood11 ( talk) 10:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Recently I recanted a statement I made on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Elijah Joyce. Could you remove the part about me wanting to disrupt wikipedia to make a point? Thank you. CurrentWeather ( talk) 11:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Regarding WP:TH#Texas Elections and Politicians: Errors: Is it just me, or is there something weird going on here? Between the long gap since last edit, long gaps before that to seemingly useful edits, the bizarre claims in this post, and the follow-up on their talk page, maybe a compromised account (or operator)? It doesn't seem like garden-variety trolling. —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 03:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Could you please block user:OtraCuenta0909 for vandalism ASAP. She clearly won't stop until then. CLCStudent ( talk) 00:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
I have added the Template:Connected contributor to my talk page. Can we resubmit our article? Rogriverac ( talk) 00:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
I started a discussion on the zscaler proxies at WP:AN#zscaler_proxies and you may have an educated opinion to offer. I'm unclear on what our policies and best practices suggests, around zscaler. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, as part of a training session, I'm helping User:Kidspacepasadena improve their page—starting with adding citations and eliminating promotional content/tone. These edits are being made by someone affiliated with the organization but in the interest of complying with WP policies. Can you reverse this block on their account? They are working in good faith to make the corrections needed there. StaceyEOB ( talk) 19:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello manager 331dot, I want to start a clean start. I have announced on my user page that I need to do something else or not.-- GB Eika ( talk) 22:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you |
for helping me so much Dart2.0 ( talk) 06:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
mustor
shoulduse the articles for creation process.
Hi.
I requested Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheNameIsMuhammadHusayn. It wasn't clear to me who the master was, but I didn't dig too far. If you know, please update the case. In the case, I mention-ping'd Cullen, who blocked the last one.
I didn't request CU originally, but as I dug around, I found an obvious IP, which I added, as well as the (empty value?) |CURequest=
parm to the {{
SPI case status}}
transclusion at the case page. Is there anything else I need to do (I see it's in the right categories, but the status table still has it in the non-CU group – I don't know how often it is supposed to update). Thanks. —[
AlanM1 (
talk)]—
09:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, can you tell me which is the correct way to create an unblock request for my case? You wrote that my request was not an unblock request, what did I do wrong and what must I do to ask to unblock my IP range (1 year is far too exaggerated)? 151.21.88.41 ( talk) 11:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello 331Dot! I just wanted to show some appreciation by thanking you for helping me at the tea house, the noticeboard, as well as in other ways since I’ve been on Wikipedia. Thanks again! Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 06:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have chosen to ban myself from this website indefinitely due to an indiscretion that I made. The mistake was completely unintentional and not malevolent, but it doesn't seem like it was taken that way, and people's feelings seemed to have been hurt, so I will no longer edit. I completely misread the names of and mixed up two people that I shouldn't have. Before I do leave, I'd like for my name to be changed and my account to thereafter be vanished, please. I put in a request, but it's been a week since. Is there any way for you or another administrator to manually get this done or to look over my request? Factfanatic1 ( talk) 04:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Since some editors are contesting existence of articles associating religions and religious communities to superstitions, One of the article which concerns topic has been nominated for deletion. You can support or contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstition in Judaism by putting forward your opinion.
Thanks and regards
Bookku ( talk) 08:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
It not sound good , but I really not aware of this, I am not here for the promotion purpose. Actually I run my business and I just want to create my company profile just for the users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Altafshah11 ( talk • contribs) 12:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Should I add the block of 843Name47Muhammad487296 to the case page Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheNameIsMuhammadHusayn/Archive, or is it enough that they're in the category? If I should add it, should it be a new section named "06 September 2020" (date of the block) or ...? —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 23:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, in answer to your question:
I was asking because I want to become a spellchecker/vandalism remover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockeycatcat ( talk • contribs) 11:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
You and deepfriedokra are participating in unnecessary policing over verifiable facts about artists. According to MusicBrainz, Discogs, iTunes, Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal and the 6,000 other digital platforms, Dorian (rapper)'s new album is entitled "True Support".
The fact this has become a back and forth and turned into a talk page discussion is stupid. I assume you are a working adult. As am I. Arguing about album titles on the Internet on Sunday evening is a waste of both of our time. Stop deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HireMeWiki ( talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
2020 in home video was a disaster, by IP address is so mad. It says, "STOP IT, YOU STUPID!!!! YOU LEAVE THOSE PAGES ALONE!!!!", "LEAVE IT ALONE!!!!", and " I SAID, LEAVE THOSE PAGES ALONE, YOU BLOCKHEAD!!!!". I Want you to Block This IP address is feeling 😠. NewAnimationMan ( talk) 16:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you please help me with this. I am just a few days old on wiki.
I have edited a page multiple times and wiki says that I am doing it for payment. How to resolve this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arti Koul ( talk • contribs)
Special:BlockList/175.33.139.143 apparently didn't work: Special:Diff/978802319. Maybe because the block was on the redirect WP:Help Desk, not WP:Help desk? —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 02:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC); updated —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 05:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Where is that, and why wud i want to use it huh? 46.43.176.74 ( talk) 09:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for showing me this really helpful
list, I'm currently reviewing it right now and would probably use it majority of the time I'll be adding sources to page. Thank you again!
Willygeorgina (
talk)
11:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
LoganBlade ( talk · contribs) is requesting unblock at UTRS appeal #34747. Would like to carry to WP:AN and restore TPA -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I like to message users when I delete their creations, and I use User:Deepfriedokra/g11 where needed. But I'm seeing more biographies G11 tagged, and I feel I need a fresh message or an adjustment of the current one. Would you mind commenting at User talk:Deepfriedokra/g11#Adjusting for biographies to help me help them? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.
There's a redlink that is probably a typo in your remark here. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 17:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
I am editing on wikipidia from past 4 years and have made more than 600 edits.The problem is that I lost my username and passwords three times .I recently made this new id but i am editing for years.I am from India and is native Hindi speaker with fluent english and begginer Frenxh knowledge.I hope you would make me administrater so that I can protect pages from being edited which can be tampered to create vandilism etc.Thanks. Tamilreporter123 ( talk) 09:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Ok
Tamilreporter123 ( talk) 04:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I have drafted this page - Draft:Atif Afzal (music composer) - adding neutral information per WP:NPV using WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS references. I have also worked on improving with the help of other community editors, as you can see in the page history. Requesting you for your kind review. Thanks.
-- AAComposer ( talk) 22:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
I am contacting you for some advice regarding a number of incidents performed by a recent IP editor. Checking the block-log of this user, this Long-term Abuse article comes up with extremely close behavior as to what I've witness/what is current occurring. More specifically, the most recent comment on that Long-term Abuse page hits the nail on the head on this IP's current behavior. I am not sure if I should proceed with this, and if so, where I should report this to. Any advice is extremely appreciated. Thanks, Transcendental36 ( talk) 13:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
I really don’t know. I thought that after a month of doing other editing on similar pages to the Republicans who oppose Trump uncontroversially and specifying how I would improve my editing as well as apologizing to all the editors involved in a friendly manner, this would be an easy unblock. Then, I modified my unblock request multiple times including fitting the exact criteria which you brought up. Then I gave examples of edits which I would make that fit the criteria. I am still not unblocked, what more can I do? Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 18:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
( talk page watcher) @ Lima Bean Farmer: Interjecting here as you seem to be becoming over-heated. You will need to show that you can edit non contentiously and constructively in other areas. For at least six months from the imposition of the block. Frankly, I see your comments here and on your talk page as excessively aggressive and strewn with borderline personal attacks. You might want to consider taking a deep breath and stepping away from this topic for at least six months. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Lima Bean Farmer: There's like a gazillion articles on Wikipedia that need improvement. There are many projects looking for help. Your options are staggering in number. You can view some of them at WP:Community portal. I think it not unreasonable to ask you to edit something other than the one article out of millions with which you have problems. On a personal note, there are many article and subjects on Wikipedia I should not edit. This is not onerous. Thee are many other things I can do. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
We have not interacted except in passing. I would like you, please, to take a look at User talk:Greenock1998 and consider whether I have acted correctly in this warning, and whether the editor has acted correctly in their posts that I have highlighted. I find it hard to assume good faith when I see posts like those I am callig out, but I am prepared to withdraw if I am advised to do so.
I have chosen to ask you because I think you have also not been involved with the editor concerned. You also understand the AFC process and the tasks that reviewers perform Fiddle Faddle 23:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | |
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi 331dot,
If you have any time, I would appreciate it if you could bring your knowledge to this discussion.
I was hoping to solve a problem of excessive deletionism which is based on poor arguments and evidence, but it's becoming the same go-nowhere debate as on the Deletion pages - it really needs an outside view.
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sports seasons and bulk deletions / nuisance nominations
Best wishes, Demokra ( talk) 19:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Oh yeaaaaah we are having a party up in heeeerrree. Apple Event yahooooo yeah oh yeah Hockeycatcat ( talk) 07:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, may I ask you why my draft will not be considered further (as per your comment)? It seems I followed all the rules and include all the necessary references to the article. There are similar articles with even less information on Wikipedia. So, why mine has been rejected? I'll be grateful for your advice! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IutaJack ( talk • contribs) 08:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
I hope you don’t mind but I deleted the whole thread at the tea house since it was the improper place for that type of thing. Not purposefully trying to delete your comments or anything, just letting you know! Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 00:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I have a dispute with another user for a while [ [2]], so far the discussion was very unproductive so I asked for a 3rd opinion. He makes accusations, when I give him a reply, he makes the same accusation, when I make the same reply he accuses me of "repetition", despite being merely the same reply to the same accusations he keeps making. The moment he loses the argument, he starts switching to ad hoemininems and fallacious argumentation, then I spend more time debunking false accusations rather than talking about the subject itself, with the conversation leading nowhere. He has often misinterpreted me in the past, but this time he went one step forward. In the RFC posted above, the said twice that I said something I in fact did not say: [ [3]] and [ [4]]. He argues that not only he provided a source, but I previously acknowledged it.
When in fact, I did no such thing. I wrote a reply with diffs explaining that I in fact did not: when I asked him for a source - [ [5]] and when he replied not providing a source - [ [6]]. He then posted one of his diffs as "evidence" that I indeed agreed with him - [ [7]]. Where it stands to common sense, that if you accuse me that I said X, you should provide a diff where I said X, not a diff where you say that I said X. He then moved the goalpost, saying it was about an older source not this one, despite his original "funny you start to deny again I provided a source" being a direct reply to my "you failed to provide any source for that 10% claim", and the RFC being about this one. Now he keeps insisting in a bravado that "the fact that you acknowledged later I provided a source on the matter, is openly readable at the page", despite that not being the case. If that was the case, he could have easily posted a diff with my post, just like he posted a diff with his post. He is trying to lie that I said something I did not say to make me lose credibility in front of the RFC. I understand cases of misinterpretation either deliberate or by mistake, but this is completly another level, he is putting words into my mouth. What can I do? LordRogalDorn ( talk) 12:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, 331. Er, I had already blocked White Wolf Finance and given them a block template when you posted a COI notice on them. It may be confusing for them to be first blocked, then told that "we welcome your contributions". Do you dislike my block? Bishonen | tålk 11:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC).
Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Current Event WikiProject as you have done edits on Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates and other articles the WikiProject works on. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to inform you about that and hope you join. Elijahandskip ( talk) 13:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed you put up a 'paid' banner on this article in January 2020. There is an OTRS queue for reports of paid editing that I am trying to work through one at a time. You participated in a help desk thread about a paid editing company, that could be related.
Thomas Mensah is a person who was born in Ghana. The image of Mensah in that article is credited to a member of Wikipedia Ghana's user group. There is also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oralofori/Archive which is a complaint about someone else who turns out to be part of Wikipedia Ghana (see the conclusion at the end of the SPI: "Oralofori is apparently the Wikipedia Ghana public relations person"). Are there further steps we could take that would allow the 'paid' banner to be removed?
The queue that I'm working on is for the attention of checkusers, so they must believe that checks are justified in case of suspicion of paid socking. Are there any steps we could take that would persuade you to remove the 'paid' banner, or should any warnings or blocks be given out to those responsible? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I am concerned about the way edit request is being used by the editor Special:Contributions/EditorMax of RichmondFR and I wanted to get your thoughts as you were involved with them over their past COI edits. While responding to edit requests, I've noticed a pattern of this user making repeat edit requests in the form of what appears to be gaming the system by trying to shoehorn their articles as citations through proxy by using edit requests over numerous articles. Graywalls ( talk) 03:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi this is Bhumi2tandon Can you please give your opinion in this matter.(Link below) Actually this is my first time drafting a page so not sure how opinion is sought here. Kindly provide your opinion so that the page can be reviewed.
Link to the discussion https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sethusamudram_Shipping_Canal_Project#Proposed_merge
Thanks Bhumi2tandon ( talk) 09:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Margie Bowes passed away October 22, 2020. I can confirm this due to the fact I knew her. I tried to change it because it had not been yet. I don’t know how to add the source, so I’m asking this be fixed to reflect her passing. Shawjt1999 ( talk) 22:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
And as I mentioned before, I do not know how to do this. Shawjt1999 ( talk) 02:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
![]()
|
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.( American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
Thank you 331dot for deleting (multiple times) the above and their draft. Please have a look at User:Bigfashionnews1 also - same content but created earlier (I have open SPI case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigfashionnews1. Have a nice day JW 1961 Talk 12:12, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me on my user page and at the Teahouse. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine ( talk) 14:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello. In my opinion, the status of the unrecognized Republic of Artsakh article is incorrect. If the state does not recognize it, the country to which it belongs must also be written in its status. For example, unrecognized Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria are not like Arsakh in the article. Arsakh's status was written by three non- UN member states. Sorry, is this important? Does it matter? However, they are unrecognized separatist organizations. Even four countries have recognized the independence of those separatist organizations. But Arsakh was not recognized by any state. Excuse me, why isn't the Republic of Artsakh article the same as the 3 unrecognized states article? Don't you think this is a double standard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sword313 ( talk • contribs) 07:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
The submission you were referring to for 2020 Vienna attack was nominated yesterday, as mentioned it's ongoing and I don't understand why it's not on the front page considering this is a major event? --Excutient Talk 10:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi I want to either correct the existing page on Tannaker Buhicrosan or set up an alternate one. Please advise? Thanks Paul Budden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Budden ( talk • contribs) 10:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi yes I did edit it as the information is incorrect according to the research I made for my book on the subject: PAPER BUTTERFLIES - Unravelling the Mystery of Tannaker Buhicrosan. But it was re edited back to what it was?
Thanks regards, Paul Budden — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:14A6:2000:C9D6:B48E:BAD3:EC63 ( talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes I removed a lot of conflicting information that has no relevance or recorded accuracy.. I'm quite prepared to post an alternative page if that's better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:14A6:2000:C9D6:B48E:BAD3:EC63 ( talk) 16:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm posting here just to give you a heads-up about continued disruptive editing from IP 209.117.66.2. I see that you are the admin who denied their block appeal back in 2018 due to persistent vandalism. I don't have rollback privileges so this revert was pretty annoying to do manually: [ [9]] Would you recommend I take it to incidents or wait until further / more egregious disruption occurs? Thanks! Generalrelative ( talk) 01:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Given the discussion at WP:ERRORS surrounding the photo of Harris or Biden and what to do about it on the ITN section of the main page, I think you deserve credit for saying "look, let's just include both" given that it both solves the issue and recognizes the fact that Harris has just as much "notability" as part of the "news item" as Biden does (but for different reasons, as she won't be president). Thus, I'm giving you this custom-made recognition of that work. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( User/ say hi!) 04:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi dear 331dot,
You rejected my content due to "Wikipedia is not interested in what an organization wants to say about itself, such as what it considers to be its "mission".
I don't tell anything about myself, it's a very good organization that I follow for many years and I think it's must be here too. And I write very objectively all that information with sources.
About "mission" while I am writing I searched many company's Wiki pages to understand how it could be. As you see YourMD's page has a "mission" section so if you can explain how they get approved I will be pleased.
Related page: /info/en/?search=Your.MD
Thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Secfumes ( talk • contribs)
Thank you very much for your sensitivity,
I also removed the "mission" section from my article. As I said I added it after seeing from another page and removed it.
Could you suggest any correction to my article to be published ?
Thank you. Secfumes
194.27.138.2 ( talk) 08:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC) I understand dear 331dot, thank you very much for your time and explanation. Have a nice day.
Hello, but I didn't engage in an edit war or made disruptive edits. The long explanation has probably lead to a misunderstanding situation.
I was restoring the aspect of the page had before the Wikipedia:Single-purpose account user made such unsourced edits on 14th October 2020 using a currency exchange rate website that didn't show nor apport any data. I have restored the previous data just as I explained every of my edits in the page List of European countries by average wage just as I have explained every change in the talk page of Materialscientist, I still got reverted by that user who only said "he holds the real data" and accusing me of "inserting laugheable propaganda" and that kind of stuff. That happened again with myself trying to explain why his data got reverted, as it was unsourced while I got this answer in exchange.
So basically my point is asking him/her to prove the unsourced data (or why did he remove the previous data of that page) and I got 2 replies saying "people laugh at your propaganda" and "ban him, he's talking with a complex towards Italy" while I tried to mediate and I have shown proofs regarding my edits, which actually were just restoring the previous data the page List of European countries by average wage had. That's why I made an ANI against this user.
I also recall on @ Deepfriedokra: to check again these edits, how can I exactly talk with someone in a talk page when I did it already and the only replies I got were like these? What I don't understand is that doing everything "legally" in Wikipedia terms, I got exactly the same punishment as the other user, while I firstly tried to solve this in a talk page just as I exposed all my arguments and sources, and instead of getting a 2nd part reply, I just got non-sense replies that didn't prove anything as well as accusations coming from this user, that's why I opened an ANI case. -- Pfarla ( talk) 10:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
In the page List of countries by average wage now an Italian IP 80.117.253.168 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is doing the same changes that "Giolocam" has done yesterday, I highly suspect this might be a sock account of the same user given the fact he's 1. Removing the proper order to mess up the table to put Italy in an higher place than it belongs and 2. Just exactly after he got a partial block he's doing the same edits as he did yesterday with his account.
Can you please check the ANI? There is something bigger going on there regarding this user. -- Pfarla ( talk) 21:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm waiting you Pfarla on the talk page. We could use the same method for Italyand Spain.I' m trying to close the edit war in civil way as several administrators required.. Giolocam ( talk) 21:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for this. I think the person is viewing this as a trademark issue rather than a copyright issue though. If you aren't already watchlisting the page he wants edited, please consider doing so. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 19:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
The same IP, who was warned yesterday for this sort of slurs [10] Is it possible to check registered users with this IP? It's not socking per say... I strongly suspect that 1 editor might be logging out so that he could edit as an IP in order to make more reverts. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 10:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
1: I was never warned, stop telling lies 2: This is my first edit. It can be checked that i do not have an account 3: Explain me and other editors how the Habsburg monarchy can be a Serb countries or regions. If you don't know history don't write nonsense and do vandalism on Wikipedia. By reviewing your edits ,you are doing this on purpose in the name of the Greater Serbia policy that led to the wars in this area. I don't understand how they tolerate it here and they haven't blocked you yet. 78.1.189.150 ( talk) 12:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for the tip. This - "must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage" - looks like the key point for v2. KRL219 ( talk) 12:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC) |
Just a quick message to say thank you for your rapid response to my request for IP block exemption!
Have a wonderful day Curt 内蒙 02:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know a user you unblocked (see here User_talk:KRed221#Blocked) has violated the pledge they made to you and has reverted to making political edits, additionally many of these are disruptive. Eccekevin ( talk) 21:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Am so glad finally someone helped I met this guy Nizar Alsufi in Lebanon he was actually surrounded by lots of people which made me curious so I jumped and ask what is happening they say that he was famous because he taught the son of the king which he is know 32 years old maybe and he also helps everyone for free, he is so intelligent and kind, like you, I hope Wikipedia supports heroes who do great things without being seen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Host 9099087 ( talk • contribs) 10:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Could you please complete the draft for me Nizar Abdullah Alsufi because i sware i am soo tierd plz edit it and correct it I will be so glad and am so interested for my first article plz i will be so happy just do it i will do my work now. Soo bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Host 9099087 ( talk • contribs) 10:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#2020_Delhi_Riots Slatersteven ( talk) 11:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Jerm (
talk) has given you a
Turkey! Turkeys promote
WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving!
Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
So i am a new user but i want to block 2601:600:A07F:8AE0:DD6A:BE9B:C072:846C because they vandalized and advertised on the Planet Zoo article. They did it on June 8, 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TigerScientist ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Is this a distruption? "hello this is a warning that any one who thinks Wikipedia is a safe resors for your papers. it's not, everyone can edit all of this. so please make sure you check if it's correct. oh and, I love planet zoo! it's great! and if you need help each pixel Biologie on youtube she is great!!" TigerScientist ( talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello 331dot, User:Dj S UNIVERSE 'Q' has made a new sock User:THESUQ21931. Jerm ( talk) 15:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I wasn't retired. I don't oppose reports of animal abuse to the proper authorities. Animal Control Abuse ( talk) 20:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I finally created my new account called "Suleeabc1". Suleeabc1 ( talk) 21:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Greetings
First of all, no ill will intended in my revert, and an edit war on a talk page is the last thing I want. And I certainly assume good faith on your part, and hope you assume the same for me.
I know there is a trend, maybe even a consensus, on Joe Biden and elsewhere, to revert talk page edits on this subject. But I have to say, I fundamentally disagree. I think there is some failure to assume good faith on the original editors part, and there may also be a biting the newcomers problem as well.
Anyhow, just wanted to give you some insight into my thinking on this. Rklahn ( talk) 01:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Interface administrator changes
So on the Detachable Chairlift article, as you see it is 95% unsourced. I deleted the unsorced info but another person undid it and said it violated the neutral policy. Can I remove the unsourced parts? TigerScientist ( talk) 17:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. You decline Koavf's unblock, but it's now at AN and your comments are welcome. Thanks! -- HurricaneTracker495 ( talk) 18:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
I do not understand what you mean by conflict. I just know that Hassan Mohammadi Nevisi is my professor and I ask you to publish this page and remove the obstacles.💖💖💖 Msmmsm1990 ( talk) 13:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Can't you remove and edit anything in this article that affects the interests of others so that the article can be published? Msmmsm1990 ( talk) 13:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! For some reason, all my edits to the page Shauna Barbosa are being deleted. I am fairly new to the Wikipedia community and there are several mistakes on that page. for instance, her list of poems is chronologically incorrect and incomplete, some facts are incomplete, others are untrue and the reference articles do not support what is written on the page. I would greatly appreciate if you either helped me edit the page or left my editing be and only checked the facts, I am not interested in spreading lies or editing fake information. Thank you for your time and effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MissMoniBadia ( talk • contribs) 12:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello 331dot,
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, 331dot!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
• Gene93k (
talk)
13:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
|
I saw that you blocked Gremania, however, you did not revoke TPA on that account. Do you think TPA should be revoked on this account since it is revoked on the main account? I appreciate your thoughts. Interstellarity ( talk) 22:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
I am done.-- Hongqilim ( talk) 14:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Would you know anything about our katra Vaishno Mata Alpha beast 2 5 0 1 ( talk) 16:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, a user called Bijdenhandje who you helped with a block is being highly disruptive on the Young Sheldon TV page. He is edit warring over something so minor and does not appear to want to engage in discussion about it. Another user has left warnings on his page which he has wiped and it seems as if hes WP:NOTHERE. If you look at the page history he has made five reverts on the page in a short space of time breaking the WP:3RR rule. I'm asking because I saw you were on his talkpage here [11] Thankyou. 81.96.245.175 ( talk) 20:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi 331dot. I saw your decision to decline an unblock request here and in light of that, I was curious as to the point of a committed identity. If an account has been compromised and someone else has made vandalising edits on that account and the account was blocked as a result, then what is the point of a committed identity if it cannot get the block lifted?
Sdrqaz ( talk) 16:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your prompt reply to my unblock appeal.
However, when I'm logged in I'm unable to add or edit any content due to my account being blocked (User: VZuloaga). I was instructed by the administrator who sent me the blockage notice that I could appeal via this User talk section.
Could you kindly advise on how to proceed from here or if I could provide additional information for reviewing my case? The page in question is Loesche GmbH
Thank you! 81.38.49.253 ( talk) 09:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
UPE,
--
Deepfriedokra
(talk)
18:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
This year, many people had COVID to fear,
The holidays are getting near,
One thing that will be clear,
We will still have holiday cheer,
Happy holidays and happy new year!!
From
Interstellarity (
talk)
13:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a subpage of 331dot's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Hey 331dot:
I appreciate you participating in my changes. I am concerned that you erased everything I wrote. The wiki page I encountered was sorely underdone, lacking a lot of details, and lacking references. I provided extensive references for my additions. I am concerned that you didn't make minor edits, rather than erase all my input. Please discuss this in 'talk' with me rather than erase entire paragraphs. I made a number of updates to the 2020 Maine Senate Election, including recent topics relevant to the election that I thought were those most relevant. I hope we can resolve our editorial differences amicably rather than report vandalism.
Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4A00:4FE0:DD21:22D7:53C0:A906 ( talk) 18:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello: The is a source from Maine News Center. It has two references to this article. What do you mean there is no reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.116.143 ( talk) 21:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
You mentioned citation, not me. Moreover, this has nothing to do with providing unfactual or erroneous material about a living person.
These are the facts as reported by various Maine and national media:
1. Information was submitted sometime in the first half of 2018 to Maine authorities that rep. Bates was accused of underage sexual behavior with girls where he teaches (an all-girls school in Maine). 2. Gideon did not call for his removal or investigate. 3. The Bollard magazine published additional allegations. 4. Gideon, in response to the publication, asked for him to resign. 5. Bates resigned. 6. House rep. Sutton brought an ethics vote against Gideon for improper handling of the situation. 7. The House voted along party lines to reject the vote.
I welcome any additional facts, things I am missing. But, again, this is an important aspect of the campaign, just as the two candidates positions, controversial or otherwise. But I will not have you continue undoing the contribution for specious reasons. People have said it is unsourced (untrue). I sourced them. Then you say it is not factual (clearly false). Then others have said it is irrelevant, and uses bizarre language. These reasons are bordering on the absurd, and again, I will raise the concern of vandalism once again. You need to say specifically just what is unfactual or inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4A00:4FE0:9479:6E32:CFCF:841 ( talk) 03:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Here are a few of the references:
Also, did you 331dot erase the talk page about this from the 2020 Maine Senate page? I can't find it anymore. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2601:681:4A00:4FE0:9479:6E32:CFCF:841 (
talk)
03:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
I didn't say you were paid; I asked, given your persistence in repeatedly undoing my edits after I make the improvements you ask for.
WP:BLP: Yes, I agree about using neutral language, heavily referencing, etc. But having a vote on someone for a potential ethics violation as Speaker of the Maine House, 51-72 is something to mention.
Your conclusions are also specious: be more circumspect in your inferences. I am not sympathetic with Senator Collins, nor am I against Speaker Gideon. I believe that important, well-sourced references to key events expand knowledge. I fear you are motivated to protect Gideon, which is not acceptable.
As to your conclusion about Fredette: he said they didn't likely have enough votes, and, once Bates quit, that this was something they could move on from. It doesn't mean it wasn't a significant event.
I'm happy to pare down the blurb, but to suppress it and not allow it is wrong, unethical, and partisan.
Who said: 'potentially not handling it well'? She had 51 people vote that her handling of it was unethical. Trump wasn't convicted, but he still had a substantial minority of people vote to impeach him. That is noteworthy even though he is a living person.
I have given a very clear, fact-based account of what happened. You have not. You still have failed to explain which of any of the facts I cited which are inaccurate.
I welcome any additional facts, things I am missing. But, again, this is an important aspect of the campaign, just as the two candidates positions, controversial or otherwise. But I will not have you continue undoing the contribution for incorrect reasons. First you say it is unsourced (untrue). Then you say it is not factual (clearly false). Then you say it is irrelevant, and uses bizarre language. Your reasons are bordering on the absurd, and again, I will raise the concern of vandalism once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4A00:4FE0:9479:6E32:CFCF:841 ( talk) 03:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Here are a few of the references:
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for your help.. i appreciate it. Milestoneinstitute ( talk) 08:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC) |
Hello 331dot,
I got a notification about you suspecting my publication as a spam,advertising or promotion. I am reaching out to you after reading all the guidelines of Advertising, marketing or public relations and do not believe that I have violated any of the guidelines. However,since we (me and my teammates) are new here would like to know and learn what needs to be submitted with our information to validate the information. We would be more than happy to submit any documentation if needed. Once again I do understand that we must have done some error but with you guiding me I am sure we can fix it.
Many thanks,
Ojas Joshi. Ojasjosh ( talk) 09:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)ojasjosh
Sorry if I seemed to be cutting across you at User talk:DeweyDecimalLansky, but I was concerned that they could just sit out the 48-hour block and then be editing freely with the legal threats still standing. -- RexxS ( talk) 00:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi 331dot. Can you look at Special:Contributions/2604:6000:CCC8:2800:F557:99D3:40BD:59F5 if you're online at the moment? I've already warned them twice and posted at WP:AIV, but I have a feeling they're not going to stop until somebody stops them. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 09:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. You around? Kindly ping while replying. —usernamekiran (talk) 08:42, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I want to retrieve deleted material for further editing. how can i get the page text back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linaotboga ( talk • contribs) 12:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
I use the services of the company — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linaotboga ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do the honors here, i also recommend salting. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, hope you are doing well. I see that you salted Bilal Abbas Khan in 2018 due to repeated recreations by Pakistanpedia. Since the actor is now WP-notable, but has his article at Bilal Abbas instead, could you please create a redirect to the latter? Thanks, M Imtiaz ( talk · contribs) 15:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
It looks like User:152.32.113.96 created User:Kyere314 and kept on vandalizing. Fountains of Bryn Mawr ( talk) 15:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand the question about what is my motivation to help artists? I can ask the same questions from Wikipedia helpers? What does motivate you to help me or others?! I think that's how we help each other to grow and to make information accessible to the public. I do editing books in my free time and nobody is asking me why I help to edit the books, with due all respect please let me know also who is a notable person in your opinion? Bahman Tavoosi as a young filmmaker has been recognized by international media and film festivals, how could he not be a notable person? It was easier in the past to edit Wikipedia but I find it more difficult to help Wikipedia nowadays. Regards Inception 111 ( talk) 22:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)inception 111 [1]
Thanks for your prompt reply, I don't wish to recite our own interest when it comes to art. I have my own reasons to follow people or help any artist that not yet promoted, in this case, of course, I have seen the films and saw his talks but yes I would love to help artists ( as in my small community I do), same as you do for the humanity as a whole, but we try to help Wikipedia to put the puzzles together to make it whole. As an artist, I know how important it is to be recognized especially in the film industry and that's my whole motivation. Now that I am retired would like to contribute more to that if it doesn't become too much of a hassle. As for being a notable person, I hope you had a chance to look at the information that is provided on his page, he has plenty of sources which are listed on his page. Thank you for your attention.
Inception 111 (
talk)
23:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)inception 111
[2]
You said here that the subject should confirm their identity. However, identity verification via OTRS is only necessary if the user is blocked under Template:Uw-ublock-wellknown. Sam-2727 ( talk) 20:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.18.58.163 ( talk) 12:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not super important but I was wondering if you saw the email I forwarded to you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 14:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
May I ask why you blocked
User:Chevytrucks=? Was there any reason beyond the the user name? that is not actually the name of a company, although it does strongly suggest the company, and that user did not do any promotional editing, that I can see. Why was not the user warning message about an inappropriate user name sufficient. If you felt that a block was essential, why not use the {{
Uw-ublock}} or better {{
Uw-softerblock}} both of which say that the user name is the sole or primary reason for the block, and both of which specifically invite the user to request a change of username along with the unblock? All the user had doen was star the Wikipeedia adventure. Please remember that our rules for usernames are nowhere explained during the registration process, so how is a new user to know that a name is considered a violation? Saying thst the user name ...is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia
as {{
uw-uhblock}} does seems to me over the line of
WP:BITE. Am I missing some fact which would lead to a stricter block?
DES
(talk)
DESiegel Contribs
20:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, 331dot. Thank you so much for removing the block!
I will once again apologize to Mr. Drat8sub on his talk page. thank you for helping me. Thank you.
BRICK93 ( talk) 23:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
They seem to get upset if insisting he is notable does not work. I have failed to convince them. Maybe you will achieve it. I hope so. Fiddle Faddle 22:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
I know that :Charlotte Crosby is blocked only from editing Wikipedia,but since I is account too,whenever I open Wikipedia using his account, t says 'unavailable'.Please lift the block and solve this problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr VeduFIFA ( talk • contribs) 10:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Block review request. Thank you.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk)
18:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Howdy. TBH, I think a compromise of collapsed infoboxes (see Frank Sinatra), would gradually end the passions around the topic :) GoodDay ( talk) 00:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Can an autoconfirmed user move my draft to article space immediately? Is that advisable? Or should I wait for my draft to be reviewed? I was hoping you guys could help me move it? Thanks.
MediaManager1 ( talk) 08:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the prompt reply! Sorry, I submitted my draft for Article Creation befor I received your message. Can I still submit this draft for review even after submitting it to be created as a live article?
And how can I know if someone is an independent editor? Can an independent editor help me move my draft to article space if he or she is autoconfirmed? MediaManager1 ( talk) 08:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the reply. Also, I replied to someone regarding sockpuppetry accusation.
I would like to share my reply with you, too: "Yes, you are correct. I was EditorManagerPH before I was MediaManagerPH, because when I signed up as EditorManagerPH, I didn't realize that I would be logged out. I forgot the password I used, because I thought I wouldn't get locked out, and figured I could change it in the future. But when I couldn't get back in because of multiple wrong passwords, I just created a new one. There was no bad intention or malicious reasons behind it. It was simply ignorance on my part. Now, I am logged in for 365 days on Wikipedia, and made sure I remember my password. Hope this clarifies it, and get the Wikipedians to be lenient as I have been very forthcoming about this issue. Thank you.😊"
MediaManager1 ( talk) 09:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Please block Special:Contributions/118.137.248.125 -- WikiBayer ( talk) 09:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Can you please help me to make changes on my company Article Syedmehmood11 ( talk) 10:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
How can i make a company Page?? Like others company haved Syedmehmood11 ( talk) 10:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Recently I recanted a statement I made on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Elijah Joyce. Could you remove the part about me wanting to disrupt wikipedia to make a point? Thank you. CurrentWeather ( talk) 11:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Regarding WP:TH#Texas Elections and Politicians: Errors: Is it just me, or is there something weird going on here? Between the long gap since last edit, long gaps before that to seemingly useful edits, the bizarre claims in this post, and the follow-up on their talk page, maybe a compromised account (or operator)? It doesn't seem like garden-variety trolling. —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 03:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Could you please block user:OtraCuenta0909 for vandalism ASAP. She clearly won't stop until then. CLCStudent ( talk) 00:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
I have added the Template:Connected contributor to my talk page. Can we resubmit our article? Rogriverac ( talk) 00:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
I started a discussion on the zscaler proxies at WP:AN#zscaler_proxies and you may have an educated opinion to offer. I'm unclear on what our policies and best practices suggests, around zscaler. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, as part of a training session, I'm helping User:Kidspacepasadena improve their page—starting with adding citations and eliminating promotional content/tone. These edits are being made by someone affiliated with the organization but in the interest of complying with WP policies. Can you reverse this block on their account? They are working in good faith to make the corrections needed there. StaceyEOB ( talk) 19:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello manager 331dot, I want to start a clean start. I have announced on my user page that I need to do something else or not.-- GB Eika ( talk) 22:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you |
for helping me so much Dart2.0 ( talk) 06:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
mustor
shoulduse the articles for creation process.
Hi.
I requested Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheNameIsMuhammadHusayn. It wasn't clear to me who the master was, but I didn't dig too far. If you know, please update the case. In the case, I mention-ping'd Cullen, who blocked the last one.
I didn't request CU originally, but as I dug around, I found an obvious IP, which I added, as well as the (empty value?) |CURequest=
parm to the {{
SPI case status}}
transclusion at the case page. Is there anything else I need to do (I see it's in the right categories, but the status table still has it in the non-CU group – I don't know how often it is supposed to update). Thanks. —[
AlanM1 (
talk)]—
09:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, can you tell me which is the correct way to create an unblock request for my case? You wrote that my request was not an unblock request, what did I do wrong and what must I do to ask to unblock my IP range (1 year is far too exaggerated)? 151.21.88.41 ( talk) 11:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello 331Dot! I just wanted to show some appreciation by thanking you for helping me at the tea house, the noticeboard, as well as in other ways since I’ve been on Wikipedia. Thanks again! Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 06:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have chosen to ban myself from this website indefinitely due to an indiscretion that I made. The mistake was completely unintentional and not malevolent, but it doesn't seem like it was taken that way, and people's feelings seemed to have been hurt, so I will no longer edit. I completely misread the names of and mixed up two people that I shouldn't have. Before I do leave, I'd like for my name to be changed and my account to thereafter be vanished, please. I put in a request, but it's been a week since. Is there any way for you or another administrator to manually get this done or to look over my request? Factfanatic1 ( talk) 04:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Since some editors are contesting existence of articles associating religions and religious communities to superstitions, One of the article which concerns topic has been nominated for deletion. You can support or contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstition in Judaism by putting forward your opinion.
Thanks and regards
Bookku ( talk) 08:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
It not sound good , but I really not aware of this, I am not here for the promotion purpose. Actually I run my business and I just want to create my company profile just for the users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Altafshah11 ( talk • contribs) 12:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Should I add the block of 843Name47Muhammad487296 to the case page Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheNameIsMuhammadHusayn/Archive, or is it enough that they're in the category? If I should add it, should it be a new section named "06 September 2020" (date of the block) or ...? —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 23:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, in answer to your question:
I was asking because I want to become a spellchecker/vandalism remover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockeycatcat ( talk • contribs) 11:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
You and deepfriedokra are participating in unnecessary policing over verifiable facts about artists. According to MusicBrainz, Discogs, iTunes, Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal and the 6,000 other digital platforms, Dorian (rapper)'s new album is entitled "True Support".
The fact this has become a back and forth and turned into a talk page discussion is stupid. I assume you are a working adult. As am I. Arguing about album titles on the Internet on Sunday evening is a waste of both of our time. Stop deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HireMeWiki ( talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
2020 in home video was a disaster, by IP address is so mad. It says, "STOP IT, YOU STUPID!!!! YOU LEAVE THOSE PAGES ALONE!!!!", "LEAVE IT ALONE!!!!", and " I SAID, LEAVE THOSE PAGES ALONE, YOU BLOCKHEAD!!!!". I Want you to Block This IP address is feeling 😠. NewAnimationMan ( talk) 16:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you please help me with this. I am just a few days old on wiki.
I have edited a page multiple times and wiki says that I am doing it for payment. How to resolve this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arti Koul ( talk • contribs)
Special:BlockList/175.33.139.143 apparently didn't work: Special:Diff/978802319. Maybe because the block was on the redirect WP:Help Desk, not WP:Help desk? —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 02:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC); updated —[ AlanM1 ( talk)]— 05:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Where is that, and why wud i want to use it huh? 46.43.176.74 ( talk) 09:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for showing me this really helpful
list, I'm currently reviewing it right now and would probably use it majority of the time I'll be adding sources to page. Thank you again!
Willygeorgina (
talk)
11:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
LoganBlade ( talk · contribs) is requesting unblock at UTRS appeal #34747. Would like to carry to WP:AN and restore TPA -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I like to message users when I delete their creations, and I use User:Deepfriedokra/g11 where needed. But I'm seeing more biographies G11 tagged, and I feel I need a fresh message or an adjustment of the current one. Would you mind commenting at User talk:Deepfriedokra/g11#Adjusting for biographies to help me help them? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.
There's a redlink that is probably a typo in your remark here. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 17:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
I am editing on wikipidia from past 4 years and have made more than 600 edits.The problem is that I lost my username and passwords three times .I recently made this new id but i am editing for years.I am from India and is native Hindi speaker with fluent english and begginer Frenxh knowledge.I hope you would make me administrater so that I can protect pages from being edited which can be tampered to create vandilism etc.Thanks. Tamilreporter123 ( talk) 09:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Ok
Tamilreporter123 ( talk) 04:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I have drafted this page - Draft:Atif Afzal (music composer) - adding neutral information per WP:NPV using WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS references. I have also worked on improving with the help of other community editors, as you can see in the page history. Requesting you for your kind review. Thanks.
-- AAComposer ( talk) 22:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
I am contacting you for some advice regarding a number of incidents performed by a recent IP editor. Checking the block-log of this user, this Long-term Abuse article comes up with extremely close behavior as to what I've witness/what is current occurring. More specifically, the most recent comment on that Long-term Abuse page hits the nail on the head on this IP's current behavior. I am not sure if I should proceed with this, and if so, where I should report this to. Any advice is extremely appreciated. Thanks, Transcendental36 ( talk) 13:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
I really don’t know. I thought that after a month of doing other editing on similar pages to the Republicans who oppose Trump uncontroversially and specifying how I would improve my editing as well as apologizing to all the editors involved in a friendly manner, this would be an easy unblock. Then, I modified my unblock request multiple times including fitting the exact criteria which you brought up. Then I gave examples of edits which I would make that fit the criteria. I am still not unblocked, what more can I do? Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 18:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
( talk page watcher) @ Lima Bean Farmer: Interjecting here as you seem to be becoming over-heated. You will need to show that you can edit non contentiously and constructively in other areas. For at least six months from the imposition of the block. Frankly, I see your comments here and on your talk page as excessively aggressive and strewn with borderline personal attacks. You might want to consider taking a deep breath and stepping away from this topic for at least six months. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Lima Bean Farmer: There's like a gazillion articles on Wikipedia that need improvement. There are many projects looking for help. Your options are staggering in number. You can view some of them at WP:Community portal. I think it not unreasonable to ask you to edit something other than the one article out of millions with which you have problems. On a personal note, there are many article and subjects on Wikipedia I should not edit. This is not onerous. Thee are many other things I can do. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
We have not interacted except in passing. I would like you, please, to take a look at User talk:Greenock1998 and consider whether I have acted correctly in this warning, and whether the editor has acted correctly in their posts that I have highlighted. I find it hard to assume good faith when I see posts like those I am callig out, but I am prepared to withdraw if I am advised to do so.
I have chosen to ask you because I think you have also not been involved with the editor concerned. You also understand the AFC process and the tasks that reviewers perform Fiddle Faddle 23:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | |
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi 331dot,
If you have any time, I would appreciate it if you could bring your knowledge to this discussion.
I was hoping to solve a problem of excessive deletionism which is based on poor arguments and evidence, but it's becoming the same go-nowhere debate as on the Deletion pages - it really needs an outside view.
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sports seasons and bulk deletions / nuisance nominations
Best wishes, Demokra ( talk) 19:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Oh yeaaaaah we are having a party up in heeeerrree. Apple Event yahooooo yeah oh yeah Hockeycatcat ( talk) 07:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, may I ask you why my draft will not be considered further (as per your comment)? It seems I followed all the rules and include all the necessary references to the article. There are similar articles with even less information on Wikipedia. So, why mine has been rejected? I'll be grateful for your advice! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IutaJack ( talk • contribs) 08:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
I hope you don’t mind but I deleted the whole thread at the tea house since it was the improper place for that type of thing. Not purposefully trying to delete your comments or anything, just letting you know! Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 00:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I have a dispute with another user for a while [ [2]], so far the discussion was very unproductive so I asked for a 3rd opinion. He makes accusations, when I give him a reply, he makes the same accusation, when I make the same reply he accuses me of "repetition", despite being merely the same reply to the same accusations he keeps making. The moment he loses the argument, he starts switching to ad hoemininems and fallacious argumentation, then I spend more time debunking false accusations rather than talking about the subject itself, with the conversation leading nowhere. He has often misinterpreted me in the past, but this time he went one step forward. In the RFC posted above, the said twice that I said something I in fact did not say: [ [3]] and [ [4]]. He argues that not only he provided a source, but I previously acknowledged it.
When in fact, I did no such thing. I wrote a reply with diffs explaining that I in fact did not: when I asked him for a source - [ [5]] and when he replied not providing a source - [ [6]]. He then posted one of his diffs as "evidence" that I indeed agreed with him - [ [7]]. Where it stands to common sense, that if you accuse me that I said X, you should provide a diff where I said X, not a diff where you say that I said X. He then moved the goalpost, saying it was about an older source not this one, despite his original "funny you start to deny again I provided a source" being a direct reply to my "you failed to provide any source for that 10% claim", and the RFC being about this one. Now he keeps insisting in a bravado that "the fact that you acknowledged later I provided a source on the matter, is openly readable at the page", despite that not being the case. If that was the case, he could have easily posted a diff with my post, just like he posted a diff with his post. He is trying to lie that I said something I did not say to make me lose credibility in front of the RFC. I understand cases of misinterpretation either deliberate or by mistake, but this is completly another level, he is putting words into my mouth. What can I do? LordRogalDorn ( talk) 12:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, 331. Er, I had already blocked White Wolf Finance and given them a block template when you posted a COI notice on them. It may be confusing for them to be first blocked, then told that "we welcome your contributions". Do you dislike my block? Bishonen | tålk 11:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC).
Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Current Event WikiProject as you have done edits on Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates and other articles the WikiProject works on. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to inform you about that and hope you join. Elijahandskip ( talk) 13:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed you put up a 'paid' banner on this article in January 2020. There is an OTRS queue for reports of paid editing that I am trying to work through one at a time. You participated in a help desk thread about a paid editing company, that could be related.
Thomas Mensah is a person who was born in Ghana. The image of Mensah in that article is credited to a member of Wikipedia Ghana's user group. There is also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oralofori/Archive which is a complaint about someone else who turns out to be part of Wikipedia Ghana (see the conclusion at the end of the SPI: "Oralofori is apparently the Wikipedia Ghana public relations person"). Are there further steps we could take that would allow the 'paid' banner to be removed?
The queue that I'm working on is for the attention of checkusers, so they must believe that checks are justified in case of suspicion of paid socking. Are there any steps we could take that would persuade you to remove the 'paid' banner, or should any warnings or blocks be given out to those responsible? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I am concerned about the way edit request is being used by the editor Special:Contributions/EditorMax of RichmondFR and I wanted to get your thoughts as you were involved with them over their past COI edits. While responding to edit requests, I've noticed a pattern of this user making repeat edit requests in the form of what appears to be gaming the system by trying to shoehorn their articles as citations through proxy by using edit requests over numerous articles. Graywalls ( talk) 03:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi this is Bhumi2tandon Can you please give your opinion in this matter.(Link below) Actually this is my first time drafting a page so not sure how opinion is sought here. Kindly provide your opinion so that the page can be reviewed.
Link to the discussion https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sethusamudram_Shipping_Canal_Project#Proposed_merge
Thanks Bhumi2tandon ( talk) 09:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Margie Bowes passed away October 22, 2020. I can confirm this due to the fact I knew her. I tried to change it because it had not been yet. I don’t know how to add the source, so I’m asking this be fixed to reflect her passing. Shawjt1999 ( talk) 22:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
And as I mentioned before, I do not know how to do this. Shawjt1999 ( talk) 02:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
![]()
|
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.( American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
Thank you 331dot for deleting (multiple times) the above and their draft. Please have a look at User:Bigfashionnews1 also - same content but created earlier (I have open SPI case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigfashionnews1. Have a nice day JW 1961 Talk 12:12, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me on my user page and at the Teahouse. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine ( talk) 14:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello. In my opinion, the status of the unrecognized Republic of Artsakh article is incorrect. If the state does not recognize it, the country to which it belongs must also be written in its status. For example, unrecognized Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria are not like Arsakh in the article. Arsakh's status was written by three non- UN member states. Sorry, is this important? Does it matter? However, they are unrecognized separatist organizations. Even four countries have recognized the independence of those separatist organizations. But Arsakh was not recognized by any state. Excuse me, why isn't the Republic of Artsakh article the same as the 3 unrecognized states article? Don't you think this is a double standard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sword313 ( talk • contribs) 07:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
The submission you were referring to for 2020 Vienna attack was nominated yesterday, as mentioned it's ongoing and I don't understand why it's not on the front page considering this is a major event? --Excutient Talk 10:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi I want to either correct the existing page on Tannaker Buhicrosan or set up an alternate one. Please advise? Thanks Paul Budden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Budden ( talk • contribs) 10:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi yes I did edit it as the information is incorrect according to the research I made for my book on the subject: PAPER BUTTERFLIES - Unravelling the Mystery of Tannaker Buhicrosan. But it was re edited back to what it was?
Thanks regards, Paul Budden — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:14A6:2000:C9D6:B48E:BAD3:EC63 ( talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes I removed a lot of conflicting information that has no relevance or recorded accuracy.. I'm quite prepared to post an alternative page if that's better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:14A6:2000:C9D6:B48E:BAD3:EC63 ( talk) 16:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm posting here just to give you a heads-up about continued disruptive editing from IP 209.117.66.2. I see that you are the admin who denied their block appeal back in 2018 due to persistent vandalism. I don't have rollback privileges so this revert was pretty annoying to do manually: [ [9]] Would you recommend I take it to incidents or wait until further / more egregious disruption occurs? Thanks! Generalrelative ( talk) 01:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Given the discussion at WP:ERRORS surrounding the photo of Harris or Biden and what to do about it on the ITN section of the main page, I think you deserve credit for saying "look, let's just include both" given that it both solves the issue and recognizes the fact that Harris has just as much "notability" as part of the "news item" as Biden does (but for different reasons, as she won't be president). Thus, I'm giving you this custom-made recognition of that work. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( User/ say hi!) 04:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi dear 331dot,
You rejected my content due to "Wikipedia is not interested in what an organization wants to say about itself, such as what it considers to be its "mission".
I don't tell anything about myself, it's a very good organization that I follow for many years and I think it's must be here too. And I write very objectively all that information with sources.
About "mission" while I am writing I searched many company's Wiki pages to understand how it could be. As you see YourMD's page has a "mission" section so if you can explain how they get approved I will be pleased.
Related page: /info/en/?search=Your.MD
Thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Secfumes ( talk • contribs)
Thank you very much for your sensitivity,
I also removed the "mission" section from my article. As I said I added it after seeing from another page and removed it.
Could you suggest any correction to my article to be published ?
Thank you. Secfumes
194.27.138.2 ( talk) 08:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC) I understand dear 331dot, thank you very much for your time and explanation. Have a nice day.
Hello, but I didn't engage in an edit war or made disruptive edits. The long explanation has probably lead to a misunderstanding situation.
I was restoring the aspect of the page had before the Wikipedia:Single-purpose account user made such unsourced edits on 14th October 2020 using a currency exchange rate website that didn't show nor apport any data. I have restored the previous data just as I explained every of my edits in the page List of European countries by average wage just as I have explained every change in the talk page of Materialscientist, I still got reverted by that user who only said "he holds the real data" and accusing me of "inserting laugheable propaganda" and that kind of stuff. That happened again with myself trying to explain why his data got reverted, as it was unsourced while I got this answer in exchange.
So basically my point is asking him/her to prove the unsourced data (or why did he remove the previous data of that page) and I got 2 replies saying "people laugh at your propaganda" and "ban him, he's talking with a complex towards Italy" while I tried to mediate and I have shown proofs regarding my edits, which actually were just restoring the previous data the page List of European countries by average wage had. That's why I made an ANI against this user.
I also recall on @ Deepfriedokra: to check again these edits, how can I exactly talk with someone in a talk page when I did it already and the only replies I got were like these? What I don't understand is that doing everything "legally" in Wikipedia terms, I got exactly the same punishment as the other user, while I firstly tried to solve this in a talk page just as I exposed all my arguments and sources, and instead of getting a 2nd part reply, I just got non-sense replies that didn't prove anything as well as accusations coming from this user, that's why I opened an ANI case. -- Pfarla ( talk) 10:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
In the page List of countries by average wage now an Italian IP 80.117.253.168 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is doing the same changes that "Giolocam" has done yesterday, I highly suspect this might be a sock account of the same user given the fact he's 1. Removing the proper order to mess up the table to put Italy in an higher place than it belongs and 2. Just exactly after he got a partial block he's doing the same edits as he did yesterday with his account.
Can you please check the ANI? There is something bigger going on there regarding this user. -- Pfarla ( talk) 21:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm waiting you Pfarla on the talk page. We could use the same method for Italyand Spain.I' m trying to close the edit war in civil way as several administrators required.. Giolocam ( talk) 21:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for this. I think the person is viewing this as a trademark issue rather than a copyright issue though. If you aren't already watchlisting the page he wants edited, please consider doing so. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 19:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
The same IP, who was warned yesterday for this sort of slurs [10] Is it possible to check registered users with this IP? It's not socking per say... I strongly suspect that 1 editor might be logging out so that he could edit as an IP in order to make more reverts. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 10:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
1: I was never warned, stop telling lies 2: This is my first edit. It can be checked that i do not have an account 3: Explain me and other editors how the Habsburg monarchy can be a Serb countries or regions. If you don't know history don't write nonsense and do vandalism on Wikipedia. By reviewing your edits ,you are doing this on purpose in the name of the Greater Serbia policy that led to the wars in this area. I don't understand how they tolerate it here and they haven't blocked you yet. 78.1.189.150 ( talk) 12:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for the tip. This - "must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage" - looks like the key point for v2. KRL219 ( talk) 12:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC) |
Just a quick message to say thank you for your rapid response to my request for IP block exemption!
Have a wonderful day Curt 内蒙 02:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know a user you unblocked (see here User_talk:KRed221#Blocked) has violated the pledge they made to you and has reverted to making political edits, additionally many of these are disruptive. Eccekevin ( talk) 21:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Am so glad finally someone helped I met this guy Nizar Alsufi in Lebanon he was actually surrounded by lots of people which made me curious so I jumped and ask what is happening they say that he was famous because he taught the son of the king which he is know 32 years old maybe and he also helps everyone for free, he is so intelligent and kind, like you, I hope Wikipedia supports heroes who do great things without being seen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Host 9099087 ( talk • contribs) 10:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Could you please complete the draft for me Nizar Abdullah Alsufi because i sware i am soo tierd plz edit it and correct it I will be so glad and am so interested for my first article plz i will be so happy just do it i will do my work now. Soo bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Host 9099087 ( talk • contribs) 10:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#2020_Delhi_Riots Slatersteven ( talk) 11:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Jerm (
talk) has given you a
Turkey! Turkeys promote
WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving!
Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
So i am a new user but i want to block 2601:600:A07F:8AE0:DD6A:BE9B:C072:846C because they vandalized and advertised on the Planet Zoo article. They did it on June 8, 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TigerScientist ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Is this a distruption? "hello this is a warning that any one who thinks Wikipedia is a safe resors for your papers. it's not, everyone can edit all of this. so please make sure you check if it's correct. oh and, I love planet zoo! it's great! and if you need help each pixel Biologie on youtube she is great!!" TigerScientist ( talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello 331dot, User:Dj S UNIVERSE 'Q' has made a new sock User:THESUQ21931. Jerm ( talk) 15:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I wasn't retired. I don't oppose reports of animal abuse to the proper authorities. Animal Control Abuse ( talk) 20:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I finally created my new account called "Suleeabc1". Suleeabc1 ( talk) 21:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Greetings
First of all, no ill will intended in my revert, and an edit war on a talk page is the last thing I want. And I certainly assume good faith on your part, and hope you assume the same for me.
I know there is a trend, maybe even a consensus, on Joe Biden and elsewhere, to revert talk page edits on this subject. But I have to say, I fundamentally disagree. I think there is some failure to assume good faith on the original editors part, and there may also be a biting the newcomers problem as well.
Anyhow, just wanted to give you some insight into my thinking on this. Rklahn ( talk) 01:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Interface administrator changes
So on the Detachable Chairlift article, as you see it is 95% unsourced. I deleted the unsorced info but another person undid it and said it violated the neutral policy. Can I remove the unsourced parts? TigerScientist ( talk) 17:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. You decline Koavf's unblock, but it's now at AN and your comments are welcome. Thanks! -- HurricaneTracker495 ( talk) 18:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
I do not understand what you mean by conflict. I just know that Hassan Mohammadi Nevisi is my professor and I ask you to publish this page and remove the obstacles.💖💖💖 Msmmsm1990 ( talk) 13:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Can't you remove and edit anything in this article that affects the interests of others so that the article can be published? Msmmsm1990 ( talk) 13:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! For some reason, all my edits to the page Shauna Barbosa are being deleted. I am fairly new to the Wikipedia community and there are several mistakes on that page. for instance, her list of poems is chronologically incorrect and incomplete, some facts are incomplete, others are untrue and the reference articles do not support what is written on the page. I would greatly appreciate if you either helped me edit the page or left my editing be and only checked the facts, I am not interested in spreading lies or editing fake information. Thank you for your time and effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MissMoniBadia ( talk • contribs) 12:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello 331dot,
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, 331dot!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
• Gene93k (
talk)
13:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
|
I saw that you blocked Gremania, however, you did not revoke TPA on that account. Do you think TPA should be revoked on this account since it is revoked on the main account? I appreciate your thoughts. Interstellarity ( talk) 22:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
I am done.-- Hongqilim ( talk) 14:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Would you know anything about our katra Vaishno Mata Alpha beast 2 5 0 1 ( talk) 16:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, a user called Bijdenhandje who you helped with a block is being highly disruptive on the Young Sheldon TV page. He is edit warring over something so minor and does not appear to want to engage in discussion about it. Another user has left warnings on his page which he has wiped and it seems as if hes WP:NOTHERE. If you look at the page history he has made five reverts on the page in a short space of time breaking the WP:3RR rule. I'm asking because I saw you were on his talkpage here [11] Thankyou. 81.96.245.175 ( talk) 20:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi 331dot. I saw your decision to decline an unblock request here and in light of that, I was curious as to the point of a committed identity. If an account has been compromised and someone else has made vandalising edits on that account and the account was blocked as a result, then what is the point of a committed identity if it cannot get the block lifted?
Sdrqaz ( talk) 16:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your prompt reply to my unblock appeal.
However, when I'm logged in I'm unable to add or edit any content due to my account being blocked (User: VZuloaga). I was instructed by the administrator who sent me the blockage notice that I could appeal via this User talk section.
Could you kindly advise on how to proceed from here or if I could provide additional information for reviewing my case? The page in question is Loesche GmbH
Thank you! 81.38.49.253 ( talk) 09:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
UPE,
--
Deepfriedokra
(talk)
18:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
This year, many people had COVID to fear,
The holidays are getting near,
One thing that will be clear,
We will still have holiday cheer,
Happy holidays and happy new year!!
From
Interstellarity (
talk)
13:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)