Reports

Bot-reported

• 2403:4800:9400:6c01:fc81:4c7d:6d75:8c96 ( talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot ( talk) 02:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

  – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot ( talk) 03:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC) ^{(Moved by bot)}

• 2001:999:500:569b:c9a:d17e:19ed:1297 ( talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes ( details). Report false positive. DatBot ( talk) 07:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight ( talk) 12:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• 64.239.193.142 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes ( details). Report false positive. DatBot ( talk) 17:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
• 2601:345:0:52a0:d98e:306e:b676:df63 ( talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 766 (Alt-right labeling, details). Report false positive. DatBot ( talk) 19:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• 80.4.63.188 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On The Real Housewives of New York City: vandalism after final warning. Constantly making unexplained changes and removal of content. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
• Neginrezaee ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Probiotic: vandalism after final warning; account is being used only for promotional purposes. User is populating articles with a link to a journal in which the user's name apparently is listed - see reverted contribution to Talk:Main page where the user is shown as an "expert" reviewer to a journal. Zefr ( talk) 21:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 ( talk) 21:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• BIDENBIDENBIDEN ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Francesca Cavallin ( diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Leonidlednev ( T, C, L) 21:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

{{ CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 65 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 35 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

Bot-reported

• Canadapublic ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB ( owner / report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

• Golygydd Wici o Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB ( owner / report) 19:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 19:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

• Retardipey ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "retard" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 20:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

• Lol this is a username ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 23:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB ( owner / report) 23:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

• Bundling.regattas.mediocrity ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB ( owner / report) 23:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 23:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

• Poetsdepartment ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 06:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB ( owner / report) 06:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

• Foodblogger12345 ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "(blog|website)" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 11:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file suggests affiliation with a website -- DQB ( owner / report) 11:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

• P122421 ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Used 2 instead of s attempting to skip filter: (pi55|p1ss|p155). Violating string: p1ss4s1" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file this may be a deliberate obfuscation of "piss" -- DQB ( owner / report) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• BlatchfordIsaac77 ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Used l instead of i attempting to skip filter: biatch. Violating string: biatchfordisaac77" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 12:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Thesocialcollective ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 ( talk) 17:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 12:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB ( owner / report) 12:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• We're the Millers women's what see have cellulite ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "40chars" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 13:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Username exceeds 40 characters. -- DQB ( owner / report) 13:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Itsspambro ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 13:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Poopypooppot ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 16:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Bhaumik Industries ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 17:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB ( owner / report) 17:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Hillarymackall ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB ( owner / report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB ( owner / report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• BIDENBIDENBIDEN ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB ( owner / report) 21:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB ( owner / report) 21:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB ( owner / report) 21:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Asim003 ( talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • ( block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Warrants a soft block? Draft:AsimAbbasLLC. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 16:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 18:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for increase in protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

MCM Pop

• MCM Pop ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker ( talk) 13:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Ezekiel Elliott

• Ezekiel Elliott ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 ( talk) 14:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

List of The Cuphead Show! episodes‎

• List of The Cuphead Show! episodes ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Request to renew semi-protection as IP vandals are already returning to resume spreading misinformation about a fake fourth season. Mr Fink ( talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Columbus River Dragons

• Columbus River Dragons ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Ongoing vandalism from IP address. Requesting temporary semi-page protection. Straykat99 ( talk) 15:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Kim McGuinness

• Kim McGuinness ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuation of blanking of cited material by evident sock. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 15:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Sivakorn Pu-udom

• Sivakorn Pu-udom ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from anonymous user, although he is a bit controversial for recent conditions. User:CricketXP ( talk) 16:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— ^{cyberbot I} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Baker-Hytch

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Baker-Hytch ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After block of Pesclinomenosomlos, a rotating cast of IP editors have been "contributing" to the discussion, in apparent block evasion. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 16:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Lion Air Flight 610

• Lion Air Flight 610 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the talk page for Lion Air Flight 610 we agreed that we only write "Loss of control in flight" and also agreed we'd add this to Flight 302. We kept telling other users but they kept distupting. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine ( talk) 17:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Joe Moravsky

• Joe Moravsky ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Hello, I would like to know if the page could be protected. I have worked tirelessly on it, and I don't want anyone to vandalize it or my work. JoeK2033 ( talk) 18:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Comment: @ JoeK2033 There's no recent history of vandalism on this page – there was a spot of attempted vandalism in December 2023, but it's not justification enough to protect it. As per WP:PREEMPTIVE, Wikipedia policy is to not pre-emptively protect articles, as it goes against the spirit of an encyclopaedia anyone can edit. Thank you for your edits to the article! > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 19:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the page. Crafting quality content takes time and effort, and I appreciate you reviewing the page! Enjoy your day. JoeK2033 ( talk) 19:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Michael Oliver (referee)

• Michael Oliver (referee) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No pending changes seem to be actually constructive, might be a waste of resources to continue to review every one that comes through. Semi-protection would be ideal. > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 19:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

It's not one user - it's lots of IPs and every pending edit the page has had for months has been reverted. Every single IP edit to the page since August is marked as reverted. > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 21:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Sagar Shah

• Sagar Shah ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by internet trolls. Leoneix _{( talk)} 19:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Joe Exotic

• Joe Exotic ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism recently TDKR Chicago 101 ( talk) 19:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Amritsar (1757)

• Battle of Amritsar (1757) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing over a period of time. This page was protected before and expired very recently. Noorullah ( talk) 19:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Zonhoven

• Zonhoven ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: User FateHags99 persistently attempts to include a particular individual in the "Notable persons born/raised in Zonhoven" section, despite the individual lacking significant notability. This behavior extends to both the Dutch and French versions of Wikipedia. Following a temporary block on the Dutch Wikipedia, and to prevent further disruption, protection has been applied to the Zonhoven article across both the Dutch and French Wikipedia editions. Given the ongoing addition of a person lacking clear notability, I request page protection for the article. Ø11 ( talk) 20:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Fastily 20:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Brittney Griner

• Brittney Griner ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A perpetual BLP target for homophobic vandalism. User:Namiba 20:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— ^{cyberbot I} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Barbara O'Neill

• Talk:Barbara O'Neill ( | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistant vandalism. Catfurball ( talk) 21:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{ Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Cindy Ji Hye Kim

• Cindy Ji Hye Kim ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The admin who protected the title back in 2020, TomStar81, is not very active and an AfC reviewer has determined Draft:Cindy Ji Hye Kim is acceptable (see notes on the draft and User talk:Theroadislong#Cindy Ji Hye Kim). Also see User talk:Markt2141#Re:Email where it appears TomStar81 was not opposed to article but thought what was created back in 2020 needed more work to establish notability. S0091 ( talk) 17:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Cindy Ji Hye Kim appears to pass WP:NARTIST with work in a number of museums and collections. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected – Favonian ( talk) 17:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

LCJUNIOR1220

• LCJUNIOR1220 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: i wanna know why it was blocked (User Talk Page) 50.29.96.91 ( talk) 21:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{ Edit protected}}, {{ Edit template-protected}}, {{ Edit extended-protected}}, or {{ Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{ Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Handled requests

Autopatrolled

User:Wikipedialuva

• Wikipedialuva ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Creates short, focussed article that are consistently suitable during patrol; an experienced editor most active in areas other than page creation. Klbrain ( talk) 14:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Grabup

• Grabup ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

My previous application was rejected as I didn't meet the minimum 25 articles requirement, but now I've surpassed that and continue to create more, mainly focusing on film articles and Indian village and town articles. I believe I have sufficient knowledge about WP:GNG, WP:NFILM, WP:NPOL, and more. Therefore, I think I'm now eligible for this right. Thanks. Grabup ( talk) 15:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ( [1]). — MusikBot ^talk 15:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done – @ Grabup:, Numerous articles of yours are missing references ( Narayanpur, Dakshin Dinajpur, Dahuakuri, and Chandmukh). If you are given autopatrolled, it is because you are creating quality articles. Based on my review, I do not think you have sufficient knowledge of what Wikipedia considers quality writing and referencing and am not comfortable giving you the tools. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 17:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

@ HickoryOughtShirt?4, These articles are about villages, and there aren't any sources available for them. I understand Wikipedia's rules about citing sources well. You can check my film articles; they have good sources. For instance, Fairy Folk, UT69, and Dukaan. Villages don't usually get covered in the news, so it's hard to find citations for them. But I appreciate your opinion. Grabup ( talk) 17:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

@ Grabup:, if you cannot find sources for something, you cannot put it in. It's as simple as that. I don't want to discourage you but this further reiterates to me that you need to spend more time around article creating. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 17:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

HickoryOughtShirt?4, it's not an "opinion" that sources are required. Wikipedia:Verifiability is policy. Schwede 66 20:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Schwede66, I am unsure how what I wrote above came across as if I was saying it's an opinion. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 21:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

User:B3251

• B3251 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I am making a request on behalf of myself, as I sometimes create new articles pretty often (mostly New Brunswick-related). As of right now I have 66 live articles, and I have expanded plenty more. I have had a few deletions: two articles when I was brand new to editing & one list I created in mid-2023 (due to not completely understanding WP:BLPCRIME at the time). Otherwise, my articles have been pretty straightforward and vary in quality, with most being Start/C-class by the time I publish them. I had a little bit of a rough start when it came to "notability knowledge", as many do, but overtime I have grown to have an understanding of WP:GNG and WP:MOS when writing articles. Thanks, B3251 ( talk) 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

User:TheGreatestLuvofAll

• TheGreatestLuvofAll ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have created at least 25 articles that follow WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG about singers and albums. I am familiar with WP:C, WP:V, and WP:BURDEN in my articles, without copying content without permission, and I make sure my info is sourced in any articles I created. TheGreatestLuvofAll ( talk) 12:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed

User:Babagass

• Babagass ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I need to translate a page (Team Zero Percent Page) in french and I want to upload the Team 0 Logo but fot that, I need to be confirmed because it's a non-free file. Thanks for read me and sorry for disturbing. Babagass ( talk) 11:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done – If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for upload process, which does not require any special permissions. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 23:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

File mover

Page mover

Pending changes reviewer

User:Rydex64

• Rydex64 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I'm actively participating in editing and reverting disruptive edits, vandalism by patrolling the RecentChanges. I use Twinkle/RedWarn to revert edits. I'm interested in pending changes reviewer rights so I can patrol any new edits that involves Vandalism, Disruptive Edits, Edit Testings, Trolls and approve constructive edits. Looking forward :) 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ( [2]). — MusikBot ^talk 17:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for the same reason I declined their most recent request for rollback - Fastily 06:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Cleo Cooper

• Cleo Cooper ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have experience in patrolling recent changes for vandalism and other forms of nonconstructive editing, and other places for content policies, using various gadgets. It would be nice to have the ability to properly review edits on pages with pending changes protection. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 20:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Morris80315436

• Morris80315436 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have experience reverting problematic edits before, and I believe that I can do more with this new role. I have read WP:PCCRITERIA and the related guidelines. Thanks for taking the time of reading this application! Morris80315436 ( talk) 07:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Sunnyboi18

• Sunnyboi18 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.

I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 ( talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ( [3]). — MusikBot ^talk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Rollback

User:Rydex64

• Rydex64 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I'm pretty good at identifying and reverting disruptive edits, vandalism, trolls by patrolling the RecentChanges. I use Twinkle/RedWarn to revert edits. I'm interested in rollback rights so I can patrol edits involving Vandalism, Disruptive Edits, Edit Testings, Trolls and revert em. Looking forward for contributing :) Thanks. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ( [4]). — MusikBot ^talk 17:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You've barely made any reverts since I declined your previous request. As I said, please spend a month patrolling RecentChanges before making a new request. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). - Fastily 08:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

User:RodRabelo7

• RodRabelo7 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools ·  sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{( blocks ·  rights ·  moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) ( assign permissions)^{( acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello, for some time now I have been patrolling Special:RecentChanges occasionally and reverting vandalisms that I identify, using Twinkle. In addition to reverting, of course I also notify the users who commit these acts of vandalism. I also usually make reports to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I'm adding this request for obtaining the rollback tool here because I would like to have access to semi-automatic tools, namely Huggle, which would greatly facilitate the work currently done with several clicks. I enjoy patrolling recent changes and I'm sure that becoming a rollbacker would make my work easier. I have been a rollbacker on Commons for over a year and understand how the tool works, as well as the risks associated with it, committing myself not to misuse it, under the risk of losing it and possibly being blocked. Thanks, RodRabelo7 ( talk) 05:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC) RodRabelo7 ( talk) 05:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges ( Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 06:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Fastily, I'll follow your advices! How many reverts do you think it's neccessary during this period? Cheers, RodRabelo7 ( talk) 06:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not looking for a specific number. But I will say that it's not uncommon for experienced vandal fighters to make several dozen reverts a day. - Fastily 09:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Template editor