Would Banpresto games be fine for adding to this template? The company is owned by Bandai Namco, after all. -- Namcokid47 ( talk) 18:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Namcokid47
Hello. I'm asking some questions on what makes a franchise that can be added to this template.
I'm simply asking these questions so that everyone won't have to go back and undo edits about these in the future. Thanks! -- Namcokid47 ( talk) 05:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Now to answer the bullet points that you've provided,
Hope that all helps. By the way, you don't need to be timid and apologetic with your edits. If someone feels that the edit is incorrect or necessary then they'll let you know. Edit to your hearts content (provided that the information you're editing is as objective and as correct as possible) Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 20:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
There is some random IP address who is adding games that have almost nothing to do with Bandai Namco. I wouldn't immediately ban him, but just keep an eye on him. Namcokid47 ( talk) 04:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Please ban or at least block the IP address "95.151.2.0". I've been watching this IP though the last few weeks, and he's been removing a bunch of games from the template when they are clearly owned by Bandai Namco. Not only that but he is continuously adding games that are not franchises or were never made or published by Bandai Namco or any Bandai Namco-owned subsidiary. Thank you. Namcokid47 ( talk) 05:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Is it alright to make a similar template for Strategy Wiki to easily access different Namco franchises? Thanks. Namcokid47 ( talk) 01:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I recently found out about a Namco title named Mirai Ninja, and I later read that Namco also produced a film of the game around the same time. Since Namco made both the film and the arcade game would that count as an entry to the template or not? Just my thoughts. Namcokid47 ( talk) 15:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Digimon was created by Bandai, it's owned by Bandai Namco. Gundam was created & owned by Sunrise which itself is owned by Bandai Namco. Neither are liscensed properties. N/A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:6140:2D00:BCA9:6C6C:1CDE:2E9F ( talk) 02:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
This, in my opinion, would significantly lower the amount of franchises on the template, and any franchises without series page could just be moved to the
List of Bandai Namco franchises page instead. What are everyone's thoughts on this? I'd be curious to know.
Namcokid47 (
talk) 04:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC) I now completely disagree with my older statement. This would cause more problems than solutions, at least if you ask me.
Namcokid47 (
talk) 15:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
I've been seeing this get added here a bit often, so I'll just add a sort of notice here; Namco Museum (and really any compilation) is not a series, as they only repackage pre-existing IPs into one solitary game. Please stop adding it here, it is starting to get pretty annoying. Thanks. Namcokid47 ( talk) 03:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Namcokid47 and Sergecross73 are correct, it's just a branded compilation series, Namco Museum in-an-of-itself is not a series. It's just a regular collection of compiled games. A series is defined as a set of related media, outside of the games being solely published by Bandai Namco and going under the Namco museum brand, the packages themselves are standalone in nature. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 10:05, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
This template is enormous, so here’s my idea of trying to trim it down. I’ve decided to keep the ones that are either notable (ex. Pole Position, Bosconian, Rally-X, Point Blank, etc.), the ones that have had several releases spanning several years (ex. World Stadium, Smash Court, Rolling Thunder, etc.), and of course the notable ones like Pac-Man, Klonoa and the likes. All other entries would be removed from the template, which can help remove tiny, one off entries. This is what I was able to come up with:
Obvious entries: Ace Combat, Babylonian Castle Saga, Dark Souls, Dig Dug, Dragon Ball, Galaxian, Katamari, Klonoa, One Piece, Pac-Man, Ridge Racer, Soulcalibur, Splatterhouse, Tekken, THE iDOLM@STER, Time Crisis, Xenosaga, Xevious
Long-spanning entries: Alpine Racer, Ar Tonelico, Kotoba no Puzzle: Mojipittan, Mr. Driller, Rolling Thunder, Shooting Medal, Smash Court, Winning Run, World Stadium
Notable entries: Bosconian, Cyber Sled, Final Lap, Point Blank, Pole Position, Rally-X, Sky Kid, Star Luster
I'm interested to hear everyone's thoughts and concerns with this, as I hope I can make an example of a template that everyone, including myself, can agree on. I haven't sorted through every single entry, but I hope this can give a good idea of what this thing should look like. Thanks. Namcokid47 ( talk) 16:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
I'm starting to get iffy on Dark Souls / Souls being listed in the template, as well as List of Bandai Namco video game franchises. The franchise is developed by FromSoftware, and they also publish it in Japan. As far as I know, Bandai Namco only publishes the series in North America, similar to Ni no Kuni (which although published by BN in the US, its owned by Level-5). What does everyone else think about this? Namcokid47 ( talk) 21:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Video games Template‑class | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Would Banpresto games be fine for adding to this template? The company is owned by Bandai Namco, after all. -- Namcokid47 ( talk) 18:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Namcokid47
Hello. I'm asking some questions on what makes a franchise that can be added to this template.
I'm simply asking these questions so that everyone won't have to go back and undo edits about these in the future. Thanks! -- Namcokid47 ( talk) 05:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Now to answer the bullet points that you've provided,
Hope that all helps. By the way, you don't need to be timid and apologetic with your edits. If someone feels that the edit is incorrect or necessary then they'll let you know. Edit to your hearts content (provided that the information you're editing is as objective and as correct as possible) Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 20:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
There is some random IP address who is adding games that have almost nothing to do with Bandai Namco. I wouldn't immediately ban him, but just keep an eye on him. Namcokid47 ( talk) 04:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Please ban or at least block the IP address "95.151.2.0". I've been watching this IP though the last few weeks, and he's been removing a bunch of games from the template when they are clearly owned by Bandai Namco. Not only that but he is continuously adding games that are not franchises or were never made or published by Bandai Namco or any Bandai Namco-owned subsidiary. Thank you. Namcokid47 ( talk) 05:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Is it alright to make a similar template for Strategy Wiki to easily access different Namco franchises? Thanks. Namcokid47 ( talk) 01:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I recently found out about a Namco title named Mirai Ninja, and I later read that Namco also produced a film of the game around the same time. Since Namco made both the film and the arcade game would that count as an entry to the template or not? Just my thoughts. Namcokid47 ( talk) 15:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Digimon was created by Bandai, it's owned by Bandai Namco. Gundam was created & owned by Sunrise which itself is owned by Bandai Namco. Neither are liscensed properties. N/A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:6140:2D00:BCA9:6C6C:1CDE:2E9F ( talk) 02:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
This, in my opinion, would significantly lower the amount of franchises on the template, and any franchises without series page could just be moved to the
List of Bandai Namco franchises page instead. What are everyone's thoughts on this? I'd be curious to know.
Namcokid47 (
talk) 04:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC) I now completely disagree with my older statement. This would cause more problems than solutions, at least if you ask me.
Namcokid47 (
talk) 15:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
I've been seeing this get added here a bit often, so I'll just add a sort of notice here; Namco Museum (and really any compilation) is not a series, as they only repackage pre-existing IPs into one solitary game. Please stop adding it here, it is starting to get pretty annoying. Thanks. Namcokid47 ( talk) 03:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Namcokid47 and Sergecross73 are correct, it's just a branded compilation series, Namco Museum in-an-of-itself is not a series. It's just a regular collection of compiled games. A series is defined as a set of related media, outside of the games being solely published by Bandai Namco and going under the Namco museum brand, the packages themselves are standalone in nature. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 10:05, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
This template is enormous, so here’s my idea of trying to trim it down. I’ve decided to keep the ones that are either notable (ex. Pole Position, Bosconian, Rally-X, Point Blank, etc.), the ones that have had several releases spanning several years (ex. World Stadium, Smash Court, Rolling Thunder, etc.), and of course the notable ones like Pac-Man, Klonoa and the likes. All other entries would be removed from the template, which can help remove tiny, one off entries. This is what I was able to come up with:
Obvious entries: Ace Combat, Babylonian Castle Saga, Dark Souls, Dig Dug, Dragon Ball, Galaxian, Katamari, Klonoa, One Piece, Pac-Man, Ridge Racer, Soulcalibur, Splatterhouse, Tekken, THE iDOLM@STER, Time Crisis, Xenosaga, Xevious
Long-spanning entries: Alpine Racer, Ar Tonelico, Kotoba no Puzzle: Mojipittan, Mr. Driller, Rolling Thunder, Shooting Medal, Smash Court, Winning Run, World Stadium
Notable entries: Bosconian, Cyber Sled, Final Lap, Point Blank, Pole Position, Rally-X, Sky Kid, Star Luster
I'm interested to hear everyone's thoughts and concerns with this, as I hope I can make an example of a template that everyone, including myself, can agree on. I haven't sorted through every single entry, but I hope this can give a good idea of what this thing should look like. Thanks. Namcokid47 ( talk) 16:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
I'm starting to get iffy on Dark Souls / Souls being listed in the template, as well as List of Bandai Namco video game franchises. The franchise is developed by FromSoftware, and they also publish it in Japan. As far as I know, Bandai Namco only publishes the series in North America, similar to Ni no Kuni (which although published by BN in the US, its owned by Level-5). What does everyone else think about this? Namcokid47 ( talk) 21:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)