Did you know? | |
---|---|
Introduction and rules | |
Introduction | WP:DYK |
General discussion | WT:DYK |
Guidelines | WP:DYKCRIT |
Reviewer instructions | WP:DYKRI |
Nominations | |
Nominate an article | WP:DYKCNN |
Awaiting approval | WP:DYKN |
Approved | WP:DYKNA |
April 1 hooks | WP:DYKAPRIL |
Preparation | |
Preps and queues | T:DYK/Q |
Prepper instructions | WP:DYKPBI |
Admin instructions | WP:DYKAI |
Main Page errors | WP:ERRORS |
History | |
Statistics | WP:DYKSTATS |
Archived sets | WP:DYKA |
Just for fun | |
Monthly wraps | WP:DYKW |
Awards | WP:DYKAWARDS |
Userboxes | WP:DYKUBX |
Hall of Fame | WP:DYK/HoF |
List of users ... | |
... by nominations | WP:DYKNC |
... by promotions | WP:DYKPC |
Administrative | |
Scripts and bots | WP:DYKSB |
On the Main Page | |
WP:Errors | WP:Errors |
To ping the DYK admins | {{ DYK admins}} |
This page holds approved
nominations that are waiting to appear in the "
Did you know" section on the
Main Page. Following DYK approval, nominations are processed and moved into a
Prep area, and from there, prep sets are promoted to a queue, and then to the main page.
To create a new nomination or to see those that are yet to be approved, see Template talk:Did you know. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Click on the link to go directly to the Special occasion holding area.
If some of the nominations are not showing up properly at the bottom of the page, these alternative pages can be used to view a subset of the most recent nominations.
|
Count of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
April 13 | 1 | |
April 14 | 1 | |
April 15 | 1 | |
April 19 | 1 | |
April 20 | 1 | |
April 25 | 2 | |
April 26 | 2 | |
April 28 | 2 | |
April 29 | 2 | |
April 30 | 6 | 1 |
May 1 | 4 | 1 |
May 2 | 3 | |
May 4 | 2 | |
May 5 | 5 | 2 |
May 6 | 6 | 3 |
May 7 | 9 | 5 |
May 8 | 9 | 3 |
May 9 | 9 | 7 |
May 10 | 14 | 8 |
May 11 | 6 | 4 |
May 12 | 13 | 8 |
May 13 | 7 | 4 |
May 14 | 11 | 9 |
May 15 | 8 | 6 |
May 16 | 10 | 4 |
May 17 | 14 | 6 |
May 18 | 9 | 5 |
May 19 | 6 | 3 |
May 20 | 10 | 3 |
May 21 | 12 | 4 |
May 22 | 9 | 3 |
May 23 | 9 | 1 |
May 24 | 5 | 1 |
May 25 | 5 | 1 |
May 26 | 4 | |
Total | 218 | 92 |
Last updated 13:49, 26 May 2024
UTC Current time is 15:36, 26 May 2024 UTC [ refresh |
This page is for those nominations that have already been approved and are waiting to be promoted. If yours has been approved but has not yet been run on the main page, it should either be on this page or will soon be moved here, or already promoted to a Prep area or Queue ahead of an appearance on the main page.
If you wish to create a new nomination, please go to the Template talk:Did you know page; there are instructions there in a section similar to this one on how to nominate an article for DYK.
This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until someone promotes it to a preparation area. To alleviate this problem, if the approved page has more than 120 approved hooks, then sets will change twice per day (every 12 hours) instead of once per day (every 24 hours). When the backlog falls below 60 approved nominations set frequency returns to once a day.
If you can't find the nomination you submitted to the nominations page, and it also isn't on this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is either in one of the prep areas, has been promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.
If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
{{DYKsubpage
to {{subst:DYKsubpage
|passed=
to |passed=yes
viral and raised more than US$4.7 million? Source: See the subheading FastCompany
TheSandDoctor Talk 04:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: All DYK criteria are fulfilled. I've done some copy-editing, and it's good to go. The first three hooks are, rather, a touch generic and not so interesting. The last two are, however. ALT4 is the best of the lot. Although, it needs a bit of delinking. There's currently a heap of blueness on it. The linking of the words 'viral' and 'crowdfunding campaign' is redundant IMO. X ( talk) 14:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
@ Launchballer: I've made some copy-editing. Better now? I felt it was okayish since those single sentence paragraphs were part of separate subsections. Anyway, I've merged them now. X ( talk) 11:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 650 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Epicgenius ( talk) 12:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Reidgreg ( talk) 22:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 76 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.4meter4 ( talk) 23:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 381 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman ( talk) 12:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New enough, long enough, Earwig notes no notable copyvio. Hook is interesting but on an offline source (Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur, Vol. 40-41) so I am assuming good faith. QPQ is completed. Everything seems to check out! Ornithoptera ( talk) 05:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 657 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 12:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC).
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 659 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: QPQ done, well-written article, very interesting hook and image is in the public domain. Looks good to go. Makeandtoss ( talk) 13:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 41 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Sdkb talk 00:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 105 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Storye book ( talk) 17:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.TheGreatPeng ( talk) 10:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: AGF on foreign language sources – I was able to Google Translate the source page to confirm it, but because that's not a perfect translation, the AGF stands. Proposing a slight rewording in the ALT below to increase hookiness, but either would work. Nomader ( talk) 14:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Munfarid1 ( talk) 21:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 30 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Ornithoptera ( talk) 05:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Interesting short article; it is well-sourced and well-written. I prefer the original hook over ALT1. My only suggestion is that mangaka should be unlinked per policy on consecutive Wikilinks and changed to "manga artist" for clarity's sake. Yue 🌙 23:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) Talk to Me! 11:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Always awesome to see more articles on Indigenous topics and personalities on Wikipedia! Everything seems to check out. It's new enough, long enough, sourced and neutral. Earwig detects no plagiarism. Hook is cited and interesting! QPQ has been completed! Cheers! Ornithoptera ( talk) 21:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Habst ( talk) 20:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Comment: I added an alternative hook since the American state is mentioned twice so it won't be classified as redundancy. Also, "home town" is combined since it's one word.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Good nomination hook, added a comment about it (look above), and no-unlikely violation from Earwig. Good job. —
JuanGLP (
talk/
contribs) 02:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 661 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 22:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 37 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.el.ziade ( talkallam) 12:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: An interesting article on a little-known ancient instrument. The date of creation, length and references are correct (AGF on offline sources), and the qpq has been done. The article relies heavily on primary sources, but these are only quoted, not interpreted, so that's good. We have a staggering 49% earwigs score, but this is due to the copied fragment. Anyway, I think that you should mention who is the translator of these fragments, before I declare the article plagiarism free. The phrase about "Athenian banquets" is repeated, one of the two occurrences should be paraphrased. The hook is cited, but is rather long, I think it should be shortened and - above all - the language should be made more fluid. Regarding the "surviving ancient snippets", I understand what you mean, but it should be better explained for the reader: adding some context would help. Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 07:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Articles ... do not have to be of very high quality. If it fails some specific criteria, that needs to get fixed. If it's just that the prose could be better, that's not something to hold up an approval. RoySmith (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC).
Article seems in a good enough state all around. The hook checks out and is certainly good enough; I might mentioned that he was reelected to the house afterwards though! Left some comments on the talk on how this article might be improved or expanded. Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 15:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Waiting on QPQ. The hook makes sense to me. Article was created on 9 May and is long enough. No copyright or sourcing issues. Hook is reasonably interesting and sourced. Riley1012 ( talk) 12:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
Bruxton ( talk) 21:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
Zanahary ( talk) 21:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article new enough and long enough. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is quite interesting, cited inline, and verified. Image appropriately licensed. I'd suggest linking "people" in the hook to Malagasy peoples, but otherwise GTG. Pseud 14 ( talk) 14:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Great work on the article, AskeeaeWiki! I do love the hook, with The Weeknd claiming that he could make his lover scream like a horror genre actress? That's wild! Anyway, there's just one issue that I have – there's a Distractify source used in the article, which is considered unreliable; I feel like there could be a more reliable source out there that verifies the fact that he "repeatedly tells his partner that he is willing to marry if she signs a prenuptial agreement, to keep his assets if they separate". Other than that, I have no other concerns, and happy to approve afterward. Thanks! :) ~ Tails Wx ( 🐾, me!) 02:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 06:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC).
Ooh, good catch! Fixed this in the article. For the hook, I generally try to condense the hooks as much as I can, but. ALT1": ... that over the course of several decades, the missionaries of New Zealand's German Mission House (pictured) failed to convert a single person?" could work! Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 00:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Jpatokal ( talk) 05:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
Johnbod ( talk) 01:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Ornithoptera ( talk) 19:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Interesting article, passes newness, length, copyvio and sourcing policies. QPQ done. I'm unable to verify the quote using the second source provided, so a replacement will be needed before I can pass this. Would also like to see another round of copy-editing on the article to clean up a few errors.
Sims2aholic8 (
talk) 09:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
-- evrik ( talk) 20:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
Laun chba ller 18:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New enough, long enough. Earwig detects 51.6% match due to a cited passage in the article so that is not a problem. Quotes that result in a match are cited. The hooks are cited and are interesting. Preference for ALT0 and ALT2. QPQ has been completed! Great work, cheers! Ornithoptera ( talk) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Cheers, -- The Lonely Pather ( talk) 11:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
Silver seren C 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
X ( talk) 06:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: An interesting story. Nice work. Preference for ALT0 or ALT2 (also, can't find that she was the last one in the Historical Quarterly source, is that in the National Biography one?). QPQ currently pending. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 17:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
~ Liance talk 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
Hi @ Liance: I'll be reviewing this one.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Earwigs show 53.4% possible, but it's a case of false positive as the matched texts are part of a quoted paragraph, so we're good. And it's a bad source to be added here in this nom (paid, and also doesn't fully align with the hook as is, as pointed above by another user). However, sources used in the article are better, while another one doesn't explicitly mention the hook, but 2 does. Another point to be noted here is the number of lines of the code. It varies by publication. Although from the picture provided, yes there are 17 total markdowns, but some of them are empty, so it comes down to 11 "actual" lines. But some sources I checked, even outside this article, do not mention the specific number of lines, and the ones that do, 2 of which are also sourced in the article, have different numbers (17). Also, the article had some copy editing issues, which I've fixed. By the way, you may consider improving the sourcing style on this one (as it's also a GA nominee). Such as interlinking the publications, or consider introducing journal or book citations as well. But for my money, DYK seems good to go, however, the current blurb needs to be modified to something like ALT0a ... that in 2016, the removal of a few lines of code briefly "broke the Internet"? X ( talk) 04:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Sgubaldo ( talk) 14:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
Uriel1022 ( talk) 05:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk・ contribs) 07:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Mary Mark Ockerbloom ( talk) 17:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
Santi ( talk) 22:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A new article, nominated within the respective period. Long enough. The QPQ is unrequired since you are within your 5 free nomination period, so you can save Template:Did you know nominations/How Long (Paula Toledo song) until you are required to complete QPQs. No pictures to review. I removed unsourced statements from the composition of the songs. If the information is right, it can be restored with a reliable source. No plagiarism or neutrality issues. The hook is interesting and sourced.
As Lauch said, you can nominate any articles meeting the basic criteria as long as you credit the creators. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 02:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
sohom@ enwiki 18:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
Mary Mark Ockerbloom ( talk) 17:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
"Twenty- seven Japanese laymen and laywomen were executed in addition to four Koreans; five of the victims were children
between 3 and 12 years of age.136"WatkynBassett ( talk) 19:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. AGF on the offline hook ALT0 source and that you will complete the QPQ you started. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 21:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Ligaturama ( talk) 07:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Excellent work! MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) ( not me) ( also not me) ( still no) 11:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Joeyquism ( talk) 20:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 18:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy ( talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
~ Liance talk 21:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Earwig's clear, long enough, new enough, sourced well, and gtg. The Graun really needs to get its reporting up though, "Metro did something that had yet to be done in this rap battle: he apologized" might be the most damning indictment of J Cole's role in the beef I've seen. AryKun ( talk) 05:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Laun chba ller 23:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Mystery Merrivale ( talk) 12:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A recently expanded article that is long enough. Most of the sources are hosted by a third party, so I cannot review them and I'll assume good faith. No copyvio issues with the available text. The hook is interesting and it was not present before the expansion. QPQ is not required. According to the tool, this is the fourth nomination. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 01:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
X ( talk) 21:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A really interesting person to read about! I think we would need to use ALT 0a, which better reflects the claims of the sources. The only query is on the hook not appearing in the body of the article. If you can add it somewhere appropriate, this is good to go. Mystery Merrivale ( talk) 10:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
JayceFey ( talk) 14:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Hi JayceFey! Just a small recommendation: While I am aware that Track listing and Personnel sections are generally citation-free, the final sentence of the Background section that mentions the absence of three tracks in the previous albums lacks a citation. It may have been intended as an extension of the primary source from the previous album, but I would advise citing it with a secondary source if possible. The hook is interesting. Second DYK nomination so QPQ-free. Earwig's Detector shows a 4.8% similarity, but it's not plagiarism after double checking. The article is well-written overall. Prince of Erebor( The Book of Mazarbul) 11:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Prince of Erebor! Has the issue been resolved? I added a citation to the section you mentioned. JayceFey ( talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Szmenderowiecki ( talk) 00:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
UndercoverClassicist T· C 06:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 22:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 02:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 07:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Both article need end-of-sentence cites for the fact of him discovering the city. The source confirms the claim ("He discovered the Shang deposits at Daxinzhuang"). The source is a doctoral dissertation, but it seems to have a decent number of citations according to Scholar, so I think it's fine to use. Earwig's clear for both articles and no other issues I can see, so gtg once the end-of-sentence cites are added. AryKun ( talk) 13:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 16:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A really interesting, and well-written article, with a good hook. Only one minor issue - the hook is cited, but not at the end of the sentence where the fact appears, which is required for DYK. Once that's fixed, we're good to go. Mystery Merrivale ( talk) 08:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)}
Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 14:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
Recent GA, and likewise reads great, no copy vio. All the hooks are nicely sourced. I have a strong preference of ALT3 followed by ALT0. AlT2 rather feels a bit dull, and ALT1 reads a bit too detailed/complicated comparing with the other two. Awaiting QPQ.
X (
talk) 06:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
AlexandraAVX ( talk) 20:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: My first one in a while. Looks good as far as I can tell, though I can't access most of the cited newspaper articles to fully confirm (looks like they exist but are in print/paywalled). I just published an edit to the article for some light clean-up but it shouldn't affect this nomination. AdoTang ( talk) 03:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 18:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Prince of Erebor( The Book of Mazarbul) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
References
そういう意味では「ここからスタントマンになりました」と言える転機だったと思います。本当はアクション監督3人の推薦が必要なんですけど、トン・ワイっていうアクション監督が推薦してくれて、裏口入学みたいな形で入れてもらいました(笑)。 / アクション監督を務めた「るろうに剣心」シリーズの最新作「るろうに剣心 最終章 The Final」は4月23日、「るろうに剣心 最終章 The Beginning」は6月4日より全国ロードショーとなる。「G.I.ジョー:漆黒のスネークアイズ」は2021年10月22日に全米公開される予定。[I think it was a turning point where I can finally say that "I became a stuntman". In fact, you need recommendations from three action directors (to debut as a stuntman), but I was able to get in through a backdoor entrance thanks to the recommendation of action choreographer Stephen Tung. It was like a backdoor admission. / The latest installment of the Rurouni Kenshin film series, titled Rurouni Kenshin: The Final, in which he (Tanigaki) served as an action director, will be released nationwide in Japan on 23 April. Besides, Rurouni Kenshin: The Beginning will have its nationwide release on 4 June. Snake Eyes: G.I. Joe Origins, another film he (Tanigaki) worked on, is scheduled for a release in the United States on 22 October 2021.]
FishLoveHam ( talk) 14:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 00:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
EEHalli ( talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
Maury Markowitz, EEHalli, the hooks need tweaking because they contain links to the disambiguation pages First World War and Government Code and Cypher School, can one of you fix them? TSventon ( talk) 16:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I've amended the introductory line per WP:REFERS. Approving with strong preference for ALT0, and possible wikilinking to the periods.
TheSandDoctor Talk 23:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
Nyanardsan ( talk) 08:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: — DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 14:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
4meter4 ( talk) 05:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. I would just link 'blackface' and 'American Civil War' in the hook. Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 22:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
AdoTang ( talk) 04:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article properly expanded, no copy vio. Sources used appear reliable. I've done some minor copy edits. ALT0 is rather uninteresting and dull, ALT1 in the hook it is mentioned as "subscription library" and this term has been used in the lead as well, but with no citation although the fact is cited later on in the History section. But as DYK hook rules suggest, the terms used in the hook should be cited in the article somewhat as is. Currently, the cited description in the history section does not mention the word subscription, and the sources do not mention it directly, which is fine here as we can calibrate that easily from the stated info. But it'd be better if you made a mention of that word in that section as well. ALT2 is the most interesting of the bunch. However, it needs a bit of rewording. The source cited mention "due to concerns over Asbestos" but the hooks states directly "due to asbestos". This should be reworded. Moving to ALT3, it feels rather mundane. Ping me once you've made the adjustments. Regards. X ( talk) 02:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Dwkaminski ( talk) 15:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
When North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un released his latest song two weeks ago, surely he couldn't have foreseen it becoming a hit on TikTok. But the propaganda tune has gone viral online with Gen Z users bopping around to the synthy-electro pop. ... But there is a certain Soviet-era tinge to it; Gen Z users describe it as 'Abba-coded', a reference to the Swedish superband.
Yue 🌙 00:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nifty, precise article. Nicely written, well sourced and verifiable. The only copied parts are quotes, which are cited so no issues there. The article had some minor copy editing issues, and I've done them myself (also removed half a sentence for which I was unable to find any supporting reference). It's now good to go. Small note: It'd be better if you wiki-linked the publications of the citations. I've also adjusted the hook (Tik Tok - TikTok).
Riley1012 ( talk) 13:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article is well-written, well-sourced, and well-organised. Both English-language and Korean-language sources were checked for close paraphrasing; no issues arose. Both hooks are interesting and verified, but I strongly favour the initial hook over ALT1. Yue 🌙 03:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
— DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 20:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
(CC) Tbhotch ™ 02:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
I verified the third hook through this article, which says: "It isn’t a full continuity-chucking “reboot” of the Whoniverse – the events of An Unearthly Child in 1963 got a specific call-out ..." Cunard ( talk) 01:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Later in that episode, there’s a great gag for film students: “I thought that was non-diegetic…”
Oh, thank you. Thank you for getting that joke because, there are plenty of people on the production team I had to explain that too. (laughs) And then you get people who don’t understand the joke and they go, “Can we cut it?”
Skyshifter talk 11:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Good to go! Approving ALT4. 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
CSJJ104 ( talk) 16:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
WatkynBassett ( talk) 20:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 21:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
SL93 ( talk) 21:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 01:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
X ( talk) 05:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
(CC) Tbhotch ™ 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC). Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nice work. This looks good to go. Epicgenius ( talk) 14:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Here is the QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Taste of Summer. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico article is new enough, long enough, sourced, and has no issues with neutrality or plagiarism. As with my review above, the nomination is good to go with 3 bolded links. Epicgenius ( talk) 20:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Throughout the decade, Tilden was the most famous sportsman in the world, Simon Briggs, "Brilliant New Biography Underlines Debt Tennis Owes to Big Bill Tilden", The Telegraph, February 23, 2018; and
most forgotten great athlete in American history, Allen M. Hornblum as quoted in Dan Wolken, "Tennis Legend Bill Tilden's Controversial History Resurfaces in a Suitcase" USA Today, October 16, 2019.
Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 04:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC).
– Rhain ☔ ( he/him) 23:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
Iamawesomeautomatic ( talk) 22:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
Bruxton ( talk) 05:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Very interesting article. Needed a good chunk of minor copy editing, which I've done. It's good to go. Strong preference for ALT0 with possible wikilinking to amphibians. Given its subject, I couldn't think of a relevant infobox. X ( talk) 06:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
CommissarDoggo Talk? 10:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: An article that was recently promoted to GA. No picture to review. No QPQ is needed, this is your fourth nomination. No copyright issues on text and files. The hook is interesting and sourced. The article is sourced and I assume good faith on the inaccessible sources. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 04:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
X ( talk) 14:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article was created on 22 May 2024. It has a readable prose size of 3211 characters. QPQ not yet done. WP:EARWIG shows now copyvios. More comments later.
Each paragraph has a source. Some parts of the lead and the section "Early life and education" sound very similar to the text in Moulton 1893, p. 722. This needs to be rewritten to avoid WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. I didn't check the rest of the article so please make sure that the problem is not found in other parts as well. The hooks are interesting and supported by the source. Both hooks are too long: they should be below 200 characters and ideally below 160 characters. The picture is freely licenced, used in the article, and clear. Phlsph7 ( talk) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Let me know which one you prefer or if have your own opinion. Regards. X ( talk) 07:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
FountofInterestingInfo ( talk) 14:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
– robertsky ( talk) 17:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
Abydocomist ( talk) 17:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Really nice inaugural article from new user Abydocomist about a historic house in West Auckland, New Zealand (hopefully many more to come!) Since I am taking the Clough & Associates reference on good faith (I had problems accessing it on my browser) I would rather stick with ALT0. I also removed a possibly promotional sentence which used an unreliable source. Havradim leaf a message 08:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Yue 🌙 03:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The fivefold is borderline met here as per my calculation. All other criteria are fulfilled. I've done some minor copy-editing. ALT0 is the most intriguing of the 3. X ( talk) 08:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
* ... that American pianist
Ella Scoble Opperman (pictured), the first dean of the Florida State College for Women, was praised for growing the college into a credible School of Music?
SL93 ( talk) 07:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: For the image and the sourcing, just let me know when updated and I will update my review! Innisfree987 ( talk) 03:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Did you know? | |
---|---|
Introduction and rules | |
Introduction | WP:DYK |
General discussion | WT:DYK |
Guidelines | WP:DYKCRIT |
Reviewer instructions | WP:DYKRI |
Nominations | |
Nominate an article | WP:DYKCNN |
Awaiting approval | WP:DYKN |
Approved | WP:DYKNA |
April 1 hooks | WP:DYKAPRIL |
Preparation | |
Preps and queues | T:DYK/Q |
Prepper instructions | WP:DYKPBI |
Admin instructions | WP:DYKAI |
Main Page errors | WP:ERRORS |
History | |
Statistics | WP:DYKSTATS |
Archived sets | WP:DYKA |
Just for fun | |
Monthly wraps | WP:DYKW |
Awards | WP:DYKAWARDS |
Userboxes | WP:DYKUBX |
Hall of Fame | WP:DYK/HoF |
List of users ... | |
... by nominations | WP:DYKNC |
... by promotions | WP:DYKPC |
Administrative | |
Scripts and bots | WP:DYKSB |
On the Main Page | |
WP:Errors | WP:Errors |
To ping the DYK admins | {{ DYK admins}} |
This page holds approved
nominations that are waiting to appear in the "
Did you know" section on the
Main Page. Following DYK approval, nominations are processed and moved into a
Prep area, and from there, prep sets are promoted to a queue, and then to the main page.
To create a new nomination or to see those that are yet to be approved, see Template talk:Did you know. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Click on the link to go directly to the Special occasion holding area.
If some of the nominations are not showing up properly at the bottom of the page, these alternative pages can be used to view a subset of the most recent nominations.
|
Count of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
April 13 | 1 | |
April 14 | 1 | |
April 15 | 1 | |
April 19 | 1 | |
April 20 | 1 | |
April 25 | 2 | |
April 26 | 2 | |
April 28 | 2 | |
April 29 | 2 | |
April 30 | 6 | 1 |
May 1 | 4 | 1 |
May 2 | 3 | |
May 4 | 2 | |
May 5 | 5 | 2 |
May 6 | 6 | 3 |
May 7 | 9 | 5 |
May 8 | 9 | 3 |
May 9 | 9 | 7 |
May 10 | 14 | 8 |
May 11 | 6 | 4 |
May 12 | 13 | 8 |
May 13 | 7 | 4 |
May 14 | 11 | 9 |
May 15 | 8 | 6 |
May 16 | 10 | 4 |
May 17 | 14 | 6 |
May 18 | 9 | 5 |
May 19 | 6 | 3 |
May 20 | 10 | 3 |
May 21 | 12 | 4 |
May 22 | 9 | 3 |
May 23 | 9 | 1 |
May 24 | 5 | 1 |
May 25 | 5 | 1 |
May 26 | 4 | |
Total | 218 | 92 |
Last updated 13:49, 26 May 2024
UTC Current time is 15:36, 26 May 2024 UTC [ refresh |
This page is for those nominations that have already been approved and are waiting to be promoted. If yours has been approved but has not yet been run on the main page, it should either be on this page or will soon be moved here, or already promoted to a Prep area or Queue ahead of an appearance on the main page.
If you wish to create a new nomination, please go to the Template talk:Did you know page; there are instructions there in a section similar to this one on how to nominate an article for DYK.
This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until someone promotes it to a preparation area. To alleviate this problem, if the approved page has more than 120 approved hooks, then sets will change twice per day (every 12 hours) instead of once per day (every 24 hours). When the backlog falls below 60 approved nominations set frequency returns to once a day.
If you can't find the nomination you submitted to the nominations page, and it also isn't on this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is either in one of the prep areas, has been promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.
If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
{{DYKsubpage
to {{subst:DYKsubpage
|passed=
to |passed=yes
viral and raised more than US$4.7 million? Source: See the subheading FastCompany
TheSandDoctor Talk 04:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: All DYK criteria are fulfilled. I've done some copy-editing, and it's good to go. The first three hooks are, rather, a touch generic and not so interesting. The last two are, however. ALT4 is the best of the lot. Although, it needs a bit of delinking. There's currently a heap of blueness on it. The linking of the words 'viral' and 'crowdfunding campaign' is redundant IMO. X ( talk) 14:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
@ Launchballer: I've made some copy-editing. Better now? I felt it was okayish since those single sentence paragraphs were part of separate subsections. Anyway, I've merged them now. X ( talk) 11:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 650 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Epicgenius ( talk) 12:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Reidgreg ( talk) 22:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 76 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.4meter4 ( talk) 23:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 381 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman ( talk) 12:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New enough, long enough, Earwig notes no notable copyvio. Hook is interesting but on an offline source (Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur, Vol. 40-41) so I am assuming good faith. QPQ is completed. Everything seems to check out! Ornithoptera ( talk) 05:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 657 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 12:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC).
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 659 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: QPQ done, well-written article, very interesting hook and image is in the public domain. Looks good to go. Makeandtoss ( talk) 13:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 41 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Sdkb talk 00:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 105 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Storye book ( talk) 17:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.TheGreatPeng ( talk) 10:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: AGF on foreign language sources – I was able to Google Translate the source page to confirm it, but because that's not a perfect translation, the AGF stands. Proposing a slight rewording in the ALT below to increase hookiness, but either would work. Nomader ( talk) 14:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Munfarid1 ( talk) 21:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 30 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Ornithoptera ( talk) 05:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Interesting short article; it is well-sourced and well-written. I prefer the original hook over ALT1. My only suggestion is that mangaka should be unlinked per policy on consecutive Wikilinks and changed to "manga artist" for clarity's sake. Yue 🌙 23:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) Talk to Me! 11:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Always awesome to see more articles on Indigenous topics and personalities on Wikipedia! Everything seems to check out. It's new enough, long enough, sourced and neutral. Earwig detects no plagiarism. Hook is cited and interesting! QPQ has been completed! Cheers! Ornithoptera ( talk) 21:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Habst ( talk) 20:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Comment: I added an alternative hook since the American state is mentioned twice so it won't be classified as redundancy. Also, "home town" is combined since it's one word.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Good nomination hook, added a comment about it (look above), and no-unlikely violation from Earwig. Good job. —
JuanGLP (
talk/
contribs) 02:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 661 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 22:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 37 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.el.ziade ( talkallam) 12:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: An interesting article on a little-known ancient instrument. The date of creation, length and references are correct (AGF on offline sources), and the qpq has been done. The article relies heavily on primary sources, but these are only quoted, not interpreted, so that's good. We have a staggering 49% earwigs score, but this is due to the copied fragment. Anyway, I think that you should mention who is the translator of these fragments, before I declare the article plagiarism free. The phrase about "Athenian banquets" is repeated, one of the two occurrences should be paraphrased. The hook is cited, but is rather long, I think it should be shortened and - above all - the language should be made more fluid. Regarding the "surviving ancient snippets", I understand what you mean, but it should be better explained for the reader: adding some context would help. Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 07:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Articles ... do not have to be of very high quality. If it fails some specific criteria, that needs to get fixed. If it's just that the prose could be better, that's not something to hold up an approval. RoySmith (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC).
Article seems in a good enough state all around. The hook checks out and is certainly good enough; I might mentioned that he was reelected to the house afterwards though! Left some comments on the talk on how this article might be improved or expanded. Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 15:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Waiting on QPQ. The hook makes sense to me. Article was created on 9 May and is long enough. No copyright or sourcing issues. Hook is reasonably interesting and sourced. Riley1012 ( talk) 12:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
Bruxton ( talk) 21:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
Zanahary ( talk) 21:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article new enough and long enough. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is quite interesting, cited inline, and verified. Image appropriately licensed. I'd suggest linking "people" in the hook to Malagasy peoples, but otherwise GTG. Pseud 14 ( talk) 14:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Great work on the article, AskeeaeWiki! I do love the hook, with The Weeknd claiming that he could make his lover scream like a horror genre actress? That's wild! Anyway, there's just one issue that I have – there's a Distractify source used in the article, which is considered unreliable; I feel like there could be a more reliable source out there that verifies the fact that he "repeatedly tells his partner that he is willing to marry if she signs a prenuptial agreement, to keep his assets if they separate". Other than that, I have no other concerns, and happy to approve afterward. Thanks! :) ~ Tails Wx ( 🐾, me!) 02:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 06:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC).
Ooh, good catch! Fixed this in the article. For the hook, I generally try to condense the hooks as much as I can, but. ALT1": ... that over the course of several decades, the missionaries of New Zealand's German Mission House (pictured) failed to convert a single person?" could work! Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 00:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Jpatokal ( talk) 05:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
Johnbod ( talk) 01:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Ornithoptera ( talk) 19:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Interesting article, passes newness, length, copyvio and sourcing policies. QPQ done. I'm unable to verify the quote using the second source provided, so a replacement will be needed before I can pass this. Would also like to see another round of copy-editing on the article to clean up a few errors.
Sims2aholic8 (
talk) 09:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
-- evrik ( talk) 20:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
Laun chba ller 18:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New enough, long enough. Earwig detects 51.6% match due to a cited passage in the article so that is not a problem. Quotes that result in a match are cited. The hooks are cited and are interesting. Preference for ALT0 and ALT2. QPQ has been completed! Great work, cheers! Ornithoptera ( talk) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Cheers, -- The Lonely Pather ( talk) 11:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
Silver seren C 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC).
X ( talk) 06:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: An interesting story. Nice work. Preference for ALT0 or ALT2 (also, can't find that she was the last one in the Historical Quarterly source, is that in the National Biography one?). QPQ currently pending. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 17:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
~ Liance talk 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
Hi @ Liance: I'll be reviewing this one.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Earwigs show 53.4% possible, but it's a case of false positive as the matched texts are part of a quoted paragraph, so we're good. And it's a bad source to be added here in this nom (paid, and also doesn't fully align with the hook as is, as pointed above by another user). However, sources used in the article are better, while another one doesn't explicitly mention the hook, but 2 does. Another point to be noted here is the number of lines of the code. It varies by publication. Although from the picture provided, yes there are 17 total markdowns, but some of them are empty, so it comes down to 11 "actual" lines. But some sources I checked, even outside this article, do not mention the specific number of lines, and the ones that do, 2 of which are also sourced in the article, have different numbers (17). Also, the article had some copy editing issues, which I've fixed. By the way, you may consider improving the sourcing style on this one (as it's also a GA nominee). Such as interlinking the publications, or consider introducing journal or book citations as well. But for my money, DYK seems good to go, however, the current blurb needs to be modified to something like ALT0a ... that in 2016, the removal of a few lines of code briefly "broke the Internet"? X ( talk) 04:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Sgubaldo ( talk) 14:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
Uriel1022 ( talk) 05:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC).
——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk・ contribs) 07:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Mary Mark Ockerbloom ( talk) 17:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
Santi ( talk) 22:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A new article, nominated within the respective period. Long enough. The QPQ is unrequired since you are within your 5 free nomination period, so you can save Template:Did you know nominations/How Long (Paula Toledo song) until you are required to complete QPQs. No pictures to review. I removed unsourced statements from the composition of the songs. If the information is right, it can be restored with a reliable source. No plagiarism or neutrality issues. The hook is interesting and sourced.
As Lauch said, you can nominate any articles meeting the basic criteria as long as you credit the creators. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 02:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
sohom@ enwiki 18:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
Mary Mark Ockerbloom ( talk) 17:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
"Twenty- seven Japanese laymen and laywomen were executed in addition to four Koreans; five of the victims were children
between 3 and 12 years of age.136"WatkynBassett ( talk) 19:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. AGF on the offline hook ALT0 source and that you will complete the QPQ you started. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 21:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Ligaturama ( talk) 07:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Excellent work! MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) ( not me) ( also not me) ( still no) 11:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Joeyquism ( talk) 20:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 18:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy ( talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
~ Liance talk 21:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Earwig's clear, long enough, new enough, sourced well, and gtg. The Graun really needs to get its reporting up though, "Metro did something that had yet to be done in this rap battle: he apologized" might be the most damning indictment of J Cole's role in the beef I've seen. AryKun ( talk) 05:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Laun chba ller 23:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Mystery Merrivale ( talk) 12:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A recently expanded article that is long enough. Most of the sources are hosted by a third party, so I cannot review them and I'll assume good faith. No copyvio issues with the available text. The hook is interesting and it was not present before the expansion. QPQ is not required. According to the tool, this is the fourth nomination. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 01:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
X ( talk) 21:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A really interesting person to read about! I think we would need to use ALT 0a, which better reflects the claims of the sources. The only query is on the hook not appearing in the body of the article. If you can add it somewhere appropriate, this is good to go. Mystery Merrivale ( talk) 10:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
JayceFey ( talk) 14:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Hi JayceFey! Just a small recommendation: While I am aware that Track listing and Personnel sections are generally citation-free, the final sentence of the Background section that mentions the absence of three tracks in the previous albums lacks a citation. It may have been intended as an extension of the primary source from the previous album, but I would advise citing it with a secondary source if possible. The hook is interesting. Second DYK nomination so QPQ-free. Earwig's Detector shows a 4.8% similarity, but it's not plagiarism after double checking. The article is well-written overall. Prince of Erebor( The Book of Mazarbul) 11:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Prince of Erebor! Has the issue been resolved? I added a citation to the section you mentioned. JayceFey ( talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Szmenderowiecki ( talk) 00:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
UndercoverClassicist T· C 06:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 22:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 02:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 07:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Both article need end-of-sentence cites for the fact of him discovering the city. The source confirms the claim ("He discovered the Shang deposits at Daxinzhuang"). The source is a doctoral dissertation, but it seems to have a decent number of citations according to Scholar, so I think it's fine to use. Earwig's clear for both articles and no other issues I can see, so gtg once the end-of-sentence cites are added. AryKun ( talk) 13:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 16:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A really interesting, and well-written article, with a good hook. Only one minor issue - the hook is cited, but not at the end of the sentence where the fact appears, which is required for DYK. Once that's fixed, we're good to go. Mystery Merrivale ( talk) 08:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)}
Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 14:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
Recent GA, and likewise reads great, no copy vio. All the hooks are nicely sourced. I have a strong preference of ALT3 followed by ALT0. AlT2 rather feels a bit dull, and ALT1 reads a bit too detailed/complicated comparing with the other two. Awaiting QPQ.
X (
talk) 06:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
AlexandraAVX ( talk) 20:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: My first one in a while. Looks good as far as I can tell, though I can't access most of the cited newspaper articles to fully confirm (looks like they exist but are in print/paywalled). I just published an edit to the article for some light clean-up but it shouldn't affect this nomination. AdoTang ( talk) 03:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 18:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Prince of Erebor( The Book of Mazarbul) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
References
そういう意味では「ここからスタントマンになりました」と言える転機だったと思います。本当はアクション監督3人の推薦が必要なんですけど、トン・ワイっていうアクション監督が推薦してくれて、裏口入学みたいな形で入れてもらいました(笑)。 / アクション監督を務めた「るろうに剣心」シリーズの最新作「るろうに剣心 最終章 The Final」は4月23日、「るろうに剣心 最終章 The Beginning」は6月4日より全国ロードショーとなる。「G.I.ジョー:漆黒のスネークアイズ」は2021年10月22日に全米公開される予定。[I think it was a turning point where I can finally say that "I became a stuntman". In fact, you need recommendations from three action directors (to debut as a stuntman), but I was able to get in through a backdoor entrance thanks to the recommendation of action choreographer Stephen Tung. It was like a backdoor admission. / The latest installment of the Rurouni Kenshin film series, titled Rurouni Kenshin: The Final, in which he (Tanigaki) served as an action director, will be released nationwide in Japan on 23 April. Besides, Rurouni Kenshin: The Beginning will have its nationwide release on 4 June. Snake Eyes: G.I. Joe Origins, another film he (Tanigaki) worked on, is scheduled for a release in the United States on 22 October 2021.]
FishLoveHam ( talk) 14:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 00:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
EEHalli ( talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
Maury Markowitz, EEHalli, the hooks need tweaking because they contain links to the disambiguation pages First World War and Government Code and Cypher School, can one of you fix them? TSventon ( talk) 16:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I've amended the introductory line per WP:REFERS. Approving with strong preference for ALT0, and possible wikilinking to the periods.
TheSandDoctor Talk 23:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
Nyanardsan ( talk) 08:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: — DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 14:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
4meter4 ( talk) 05:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. I would just link 'blackface' and 'American Civil War' in the hook. Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 22:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
AdoTang ( talk) 04:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article properly expanded, no copy vio. Sources used appear reliable. I've done some minor copy edits. ALT0 is rather uninteresting and dull, ALT1 in the hook it is mentioned as "subscription library" and this term has been used in the lead as well, but with no citation although the fact is cited later on in the History section. But as DYK hook rules suggest, the terms used in the hook should be cited in the article somewhat as is. Currently, the cited description in the history section does not mention the word subscription, and the sources do not mention it directly, which is fine here as we can calibrate that easily from the stated info. But it'd be better if you made a mention of that word in that section as well. ALT2 is the most interesting of the bunch. However, it needs a bit of rewording. The source cited mention "due to concerns over Asbestos" but the hooks states directly "due to asbestos". This should be reworded. Moving to ALT3, it feels rather mundane. Ping me once you've made the adjustments. Regards. X ( talk) 02:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Dwkaminski ( talk) 15:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
When North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un released his latest song two weeks ago, surely he couldn't have foreseen it becoming a hit on TikTok. But the propaganda tune has gone viral online with Gen Z users bopping around to the synthy-electro pop. ... But there is a certain Soviet-era tinge to it; Gen Z users describe it as 'Abba-coded', a reference to the Swedish superband.
Yue 🌙 00:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nifty, precise article. Nicely written, well sourced and verifiable. The only copied parts are quotes, which are cited so no issues there. The article had some minor copy editing issues, and I've done them myself (also removed half a sentence for which I was unable to find any supporting reference). It's now good to go. Small note: It'd be better if you wiki-linked the publications of the citations. I've also adjusted the hook (Tik Tok - TikTok).
Riley1012 ( talk) 13:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article is well-written, well-sourced, and well-organised. Both English-language and Korean-language sources were checked for close paraphrasing; no issues arose. Both hooks are interesting and verified, but I strongly favour the initial hook over ALT1. Yue 🌙 03:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
— DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 20:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
(CC) Tbhotch ™ 02:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
I verified the third hook through this article, which says: "It isn’t a full continuity-chucking “reboot” of the Whoniverse – the events of An Unearthly Child in 1963 got a specific call-out ..." Cunard ( talk) 01:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Later in that episode, there’s a great gag for film students: “I thought that was non-diegetic…”
Oh, thank you. Thank you for getting that joke because, there are plenty of people on the production team I had to explain that too. (laughs) And then you get people who don’t understand the joke and they go, “Can we cut it?”
Skyshifter talk 11:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Good to go! Approving ALT4. 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
CSJJ104 ( talk) 16:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
WatkynBassett ( talk) 20:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 21:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
SL93 ( talk) 21:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 01:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
X ( talk) 05:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
(CC) Tbhotch ™ 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC). Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nice work. This looks good to go. Epicgenius ( talk) 14:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Here is the QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Taste of Summer. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico article is new enough, long enough, sourced, and has no issues with neutrality or plagiarism. As with my review above, the nomination is good to go with 3 bolded links. Epicgenius ( talk) 20:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Throughout the decade, Tilden was the most famous sportsman in the world, Simon Briggs, "Brilliant New Biography Underlines Debt Tennis Owes to Big Bill Tilden", The Telegraph, February 23, 2018; and
most forgotten great athlete in American history, Allen M. Hornblum as quoted in Dan Wolken, "Tennis Legend Bill Tilden's Controversial History Resurfaces in a Suitcase" USA Today, October 16, 2019.
Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 04:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC).
– Rhain ☔ ( he/him) 23:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
Iamawesomeautomatic ( talk) 22:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
Bruxton ( talk) 05:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Very interesting article. Needed a good chunk of minor copy editing, which I've done. It's good to go. Strong preference for ALT0 with possible wikilinking to amphibians. Given its subject, I couldn't think of a relevant infobox. X ( talk) 06:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC).
CommissarDoggo Talk? 10:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: An article that was recently promoted to GA. No picture to review. No QPQ is needed, this is your fourth nomination. No copyright issues on text and files. The hook is interesting and sourced. The article is sourced and I assume good faith on the inaccessible sources. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 04:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
X ( talk) 14:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article was created on 22 May 2024. It has a readable prose size of 3211 characters. QPQ not yet done. WP:EARWIG shows now copyvios. More comments later.
Each paragraph has a source. Some parts of the lead and the section "Early life and education" sound very similar to the text in Moulton 1893, p. 722. This needs to be rewritten to avoid WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. I didn't check the rest of the article so please make sure that the problem is not found in other parts as well. The hooks are interesting and supported by the source. Both hooks are too long: they should be below 200 characters and ideally below 160 characters. The picture is freely licenced, used in the article, and clear. Phlsph7 ( talk) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Let me know which one you prefer or if have your own opinion. Regards. X ( talk) 07:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
FountofInterestingInfo ( talk) 14:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
– robertsky ( talk) 17:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
Abydocomist ( talk) 17:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Really nice inaugural article from new user Abydocomist about a historic house in West Auckland, New Zealand (hopefully many more to come!) Since I am taking the Clough & Associates reference on good faith (I had problems accessing it on my browser) I would rather stick with ALT0. I also removed a possibly promotional sentence which used an unreliable source. Havradim leaf a message 08:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Yue 🌙 03:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The fivefold is borderline met here as per my calculation. All other criteria are fulfilled. I've done some minor copy-editing. ALT0 is the most intriguing of the 3. X ( talk) 08:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
* ... that American pianist
Ella Scoble Opperman (pictured), the first dean of the Florida State College for Women, was praised for growing the college into a credible School of Music?
SL93 ( talk) 07:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: For the image and the sourcing, just let me know when updated and I will update my review! Innisfree987 ( talk) 03:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)