This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 03:59, May 5, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Basic factual statements like "Tango Gameworks' first game was formally teased in April 2012 under the codename Zwei" only need a single citation, maybe two if you want one as backup. I'd pick the ref that goes into the fact in the most depth and remove the rest (four+ refs is overkill for non-controversial facts). czar 16:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Czar: I can't seem to find a source covering the rebrand Tango [K.K.] -> Tango Gameworks, though it is mentioned on
their website ("After being merged with ZeniMax Asia K.K., the studio is rebranded as Tango Gameworks."). Any idea on how to resolve this?
Lordtobi (
✉) 16:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Better to not mention it at all if it wasn't important enough to be covered in a secondary source. (Technical aspects like company legal name changes and specific dates are usually not worth the space in the article anyway—usually extraneous when writing for a general audience.) czar 16:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
So the short coverage that it was Tango K.K. "in 2010" in the infobox is sufficient? Should we use the website as 'source' for this or is just the claim sufficient?
Lordtobi (
✉) 16:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Ghostwire Tokyo
I know that someone somewhere said that this game was tied to the MCU.
MPedits (
talk) 20:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
You know the drill, provide a source and its in.
Lordtobi (
✉) 20:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 03:59, May 5, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Basic factual statements like "Tango Gameworks' first game was formally teased in April 2012 under the codename Zwei" only need a single citation, maybe two if you want one as backup. I'd pick the ref that goes into the fact in the most depth and remove the rest (four+ refs is overkill for non-controversial facts). czar 16:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Czar: I can't seem to find a source covering the rebrand Tango [K.K.] -> Tango Gameworks, though it is mentioned on
their website ("After being merged with ZeniMax Asia K.K., the studio is rebranded as Tango Gameworks."). Any idea on how to resolve this?
Lordtobi (
✉) 16:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Better to not mention it at all if it wasn't important enough to be covered in a secondary source. (Technical aspects like company legal name changes and specific dates are usually not worth the space in the article anyway—usually extraneous when writing for a general audience.) czar 16:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
So the short coverage that it was Tango K.K. "in 2010" in the infobox is sufficient? Should we use the website as 'source' for this or is just the claim sufficient?
Lordtobi (
✉) 16:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Ghostwire Tokyo
I know that someone somewhere said that this game was tied to the MCU.
MPedits (
talk) 20:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
You know the drill, provide a source and its in.
Lordtobi (
✉) 20:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply