This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in
business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the
Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in
2016, when it received 13,053,414 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report10 times. The weeks in which this happened:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[White House Office#Office of Economic Initiatives and Entrepreneurship|Office of Economic Initiatives and Entrepreneurship]] The anchor (#Office of Economic Initiatives and Entrepreneurship) has been
deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
A fact from Ivanka Trump appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 April 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that in 2017 Ivanka Trump(pictured) became the first Jewish member of a U.S. first family?
I added the fact that Lara Trump was elected to the Co-chair position of the RNC please feel free to edit the section of the article as you wish its kind of a stub currently and needs more information about it
paytonisboss (
talk)
Out of date information
The Footnote section has,
"Ivanka Trump is sometimes also called a 'Senior Advisor to the President' (or sometimes a 'senior advisor to the President', without the upper case 'S' and 'A'), even though that is actually the title of her husband Jared Kushner, while her own title is 'Advisor to the President",
which is written in the present tense, although her father hasn't been president for several years.
'Is' should be changed to 'was' in several places, or the Footnote should be removed. Recommend the latter as it is is of marginal, if any, interest several years after it was applicable.
217.42.2.32 (
talk)
03:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)reply
A reliable source stating that Trump is no longer president of the US, hence the present tense is incorrect? Good point! Of course, Trump is still president and so Ivanka is still in the role. Make America (Something) Again?
217.42.2.32 (
talk)
07:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Tim O'Doherty Thanks: i have looked over it thoroughly as stated, but the only improvement i could say adding a bit more to the introduction part of the article at the top and adding sources for that if expanded, other than that the article meets all of the objective requirements to a Good article status, of course for featured article it would need to be a lot more different in structure and stuff since it is a higher tier of Wiki's standards for the Best of the Best, but for Mrs. Ivanka Trump all of the citation(s), images, layout manual and exc meets the bar test Wikipedia has agreed on for it to be rewarded a GA status. There really isn't anything to be said, unless someone else comes in, if not then i think it indeed passed. Wait for 3 days for someone to join if not then i think its finished.
CtasACT (
talk)
20:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi CtasACT, the review below does not indicate which sources were checked to see if they supported the text and to see if there was any plagiarism. The article also has a lot of
WP:Proseline and similar choppy prose, which does not suggest clear or concise writing. The article has a section which is entirely empty except for a main link; if this is an important topic that is enough to fail broadness on its own, if it is not important this should not be a section. The lead is incomplete, not covering some of the article's main sections, although the expansion to the lead does not need more sources as suggested.
CMD (
talk)
01:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Aha you're right, as
WP:Proseline states 'Sometimes proseline is a bit sneakier,' so as we agree the sourcing is not the problem the structural integrity would be, so i would suggest you to give a throughout break down one some specific issues which sub-section/section(s): Because i do think that this could be fixed really quickly within 3 days and making this GA go through. Since on
WP:Proseline it has a "Example of a proseline and a possible resolution" section which can help it. Well i will let the contributor know to fix this problem. Sincerely thanks!
CtasACT (
talk)
02:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I have let the nominator know about this, again i think this article is 90% done, only some minor structural changes are need as you said as sections and the Proseline, if the nominator is willing they could fix the problem within 2-3 days if not this article would need to be put on hold waiting for recommended changes and then i do think this article would meet any and all GA status requirements (It already meets the Verifiable, NPOV, Stable, Images). Thanks for your vigilance and discreet notice! @
ChipmunkdavisCtasACT (
talk)
02:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Chipmunkdavis Since you have edited Wikipedia far longer than i have i would suggest for you to correct and all Broad coverage and well written categories within this review, please in you're free time give some fixs for @
MSincccc if they are still confused on the instructions
CtasACT (
talk)
02:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I am not well read enough on the article subject to make a comment on broadness beyond what is immediately apparent in the article. If the Cultural depictions are important, that section should have a couple of paragraphs explaining them. If the cultural depictions are not that important, the section should probably be replaced with a sentence or two elsewhere. In the lead, at the least a sentence or two should be added to cover Early Life, Social and political causes, and Personal life. The current lead is weirdly abrupt, for example dropping "alongside Jared Kushner" without any indication of who Jared Kushner is. A few of the sources in the lead are not used elsewhere, which indicates the lead was not developed as a summary of the body.
CMD (
talk)
03:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
MSincccc I think the article is going very well you did fix the section problem it appears on the GA advice, i think you could finish the Trump admin problem through today and tomorrow! And have thought out: thinking the likelihood this article would be given a GA status by me would be by March 20 or most likely the Maximum, of March 21 if the changes are put in!
CtasACT (
talk)
22:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass (It gives her personal life well without going to deep in addition to giving good in dive but yet the summary point of view in her political activities, again since she had a relatively normal executive position, the in-depth dive wouldn't be necessary as the extent of Presidents or Secretaries of State for example (Even for them broad coverage at an extent is required), which this article balances in it's generalization, which is good in this article and it follows)
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass (Overall gives and leans more to the objective factual side rather than lean towards any political or social ideological views of either sides: it gives occurrences, political events, social events and such and responses of such rather than opinion and only opinion which follows
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)
5. Stable?: Pass (No edit wars or conflict regarding article material, only minor edits)
6. Images?: Pass (Reasons:All images have valid copyright tags that meet Wikipedia's Copyright and a non-free rational use: All images are
Public Domain or
Creative Commons licensed images or audiovisual)
@
Another Believer I am ready to help but failing this review is obviously not an immediate solution. Its still very much early in the process. Lets sort it out all and see if we can get it promoted to GA status. Regards
MSincccc (
talk)
16:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I think the Cultural depictions article should be kept and expanded, and the parent article (Ivanka Trump) should have a brief summary of cultural depictions. You've said you're ready to help, but from my perspective, all you've done is merged "my" content re: cultural depictions without attribution, flagged a page I've worked on for deletion, and reverted my trimmed version of the cultural depictions from
Ivanka Trump. Not exactly constructive collaboration... ---
Another Believer(
Talk)16:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Another Believer Lets focus on the present. Now that we know each other I hope the two of us can together work towards a successful GA as soon as possible. Let me know of any changes you wish to make and do make any changes you think are constructive and will take us to our desired goal. Regards
MSincccc (
talk)
16:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I did. I trimmed the Cultural depictions section at Ivanka Trump because I think the
Ivanka Trump article only needs a brief summary of
Cultural depictions of Ivanka Trump. If you want to collaborate, then I would ask you to: 1) remove the PROD tag, 2) trim the Cultural depictions section, and 3) expand the Cultural depictions article (if you feel inclined). Otherwise, no other editors have supported your effort to merge/delete, and actually Randy Kryn reverted your merge, so the onus is on you to get consensus to merge. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)16:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Another Believer PROD tag has been removed. Would like to know from you just how much needs to be trimmed from the Cultural depictions section of the main article. As for the third proposal, it has nothing to do with the GA review as long as it covers sufficient amount of information on her cultural depictions. I would be happy to help. Regards
MSincccc (
talk)
17:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I consider the 'cultural depictions' issue resolved for now, but I am not interested in reviewing the rest of the article, nor do I care about Ivanka Trump ---
Another Believer(
Talk)17:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Nice job getting this article to GA! It's very well-written and put together and I think the hook is rather interesting, although I would perhaps drop "holds the distinction of being" in favour of "was", just for the sake of concision.
Grnrchst (
talk)
12:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Grnrchst Then you are most welcome to make the changes. Thanks for your appreciation but this could not have been possible without the reviewer CtasACT and user Another Believer who helped me with making the necessary changes.
None of which precede the edit by Gilliam in 2005 but don't offer Wikipedia as a source as mentioned in my earlier example above (and which also appears in a lot of other sources). Not definitive, but
People is at
WP:RSPS and given the subject of the article (Family Tree: All About...) I think we can use it?
microbiologyMarcuspetri dish·
growths13:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The risk is that "reliable sources" often repeat unsourced information already in Wikipedia, leaving us to wonder if the information, especially if published after it was introduced in Wikipedia, was truly vetted.—
Bagumba (
talk)
23:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in
business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the
Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in
2016, when it received 13,053,414 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report10 times. The weeks in which this happened:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[White House Office#Office of Economic Initiatives and Entrepreneurship|Office of Economic Initiatives and Entrepreneurship]] The anchor (#Office of Economic Initiatives and Entrepreneurship) has been
deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
A fact from Ivanka Trump appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 April 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that in 2017 Ivanka Trump(pictured) became the first Jewish member of a U.S. first family?
I added the fact that Lara Trump was elected to the Co-chair position of the RNC please feel free to edit the section of the article as you wish its kind of a stub currently and needs more information about it
paytonisboss (
talk)
Out of date information
The Footnote section has,
"Ivanka Trump is sometimes also called a 'Senior Advisor to the President' (or sometimes a 'senior advisor to the President', without the upper case 'S' and 'A'), even though that is actually the title of her husband Jared Kushner, while her own title is 'Advisor to the President",
which is written in the present tense, although her father hasn't been president for several years.
'Is' should be changed to 'was' in several places, or the Footnote should be removed. Recommend the latter as it is is of marginal, if any, interest several years after it was applicable.
217.42.2.32 (
talk)
03:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)reply
A reliable source stating that Trump is no longer president of the US, hence the present tense is incorrect? Good point! Of course, Trump is still president and so Ivanka is still in the role. Make America (Something) Again?
217.42.2.32 (
talk)
07:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Tim O'Doherty Thanks: i have looked over it thoroughly as stated, but the only improvement i could say adding a bit more to the introduction part of the article at the top and adding sources for that if expanded, other than that the article meets all of the objective requirements to a Good article status, of course for featured article it would need to be a lot more different in structure and stuff since it is a higher tier of Wiki's standards for the Best of the Best, but for Mrs. Ivanka Trump all of the citation(s), images, layout manual and exc meets the bar test Wikipedia has agreed on for it to be rewarded a GA status. There really isn't anything to be said, unless someone else comes in, if not then i think it indeed passed. Wait for 3 days for someone to join if not then i think its finished.
CtasACT (
talk)
20:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi CtasACT, the review below does not indicate which sources were checked to see if they supported the text and to see if there was any plagiarism. The article also has a lot of
WP:Proseline and similar choppy prose, which does not suggest clear or concise writing. The article has a section which is entirely empty except for a main link; if this is an important topic that is enough to fail broadness on its own, if it is not important this should not be a section. The lead is incomplete, not covering some of the article's main sections, although the expansion to the lead does not need more sources as suggested.
CMD (
talk)
01:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Aha you're right, as
WP:Proseline states 'Sometimes proseline is a bit sneakier,' so as we agree the sourcing is not the problem the structural integrity would be, so i would suggest you to give a throughout break down one some specific issues which sub-section/section(s): Because i do think that this could be fixed really quickly within 3 days and making this GA go through. Since on
WP:Proseline it has a "Example of a proseline and a possible resolution" section which can help it. Well i will let the contributor know to fix this problem. Sincerely thanks!
CtasACT (
talk)
02:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I have let the nominator know about this, again i think this article is 90% done, only some minor structural changes are need as you said as sections and the Proseline, if the nominator is willing they could fix the problem within 2-3 days if not this article would need to be put on hold waiting for recommended changes and then i do think this article would meet any and all GA status requirements (It already meets the Verifiable, NPOV, Stable, Images). Thanks for your vigilance and discreet notice! @
ChipmunkdavisCtasACT (
talk)
02:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Chipmunkdavis Since you have edited Wikipedia far longer than i have i would suggest for you to correct and all Broad coverage and well written categories within this review, please in you're free time give some fixs for @
MSincccc if they are still confused on the instructions
CtasACT (
talk)
02:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I am not well read enough on the article subject to make a comment on broadness beyond what is immediately apparent in the article. If the Cultural depictions are important, that section should have a couple of paragraphs explaining them. If the cultural depictions are not that important, the section should probably be replaced with a sentence or two elsewhere. In the lead, at the least a sentence or two should be added to cover Early Life, Social and political causes, and Personal life. The current lead is weirdly abrupt, for example dropping "alongside Jared Kushner" without any indication of who Jared Kushner is. A few of the sources in the lead are not used elsewhere, which indicates the lead was not developed as a summary of the body.
CMD (
talk)
03:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
MSincccc I think the article is going very well you did fix the section problem it appears on the GA advice, i think you could finish the Trump admin problem through today and tomorrow! And have thought out: thinking the likelihood this article would be given a GA status by me would be by March 20 or most likely the Maximum, of March 21 if the changes are put in!
CtasACT (
talk)
22:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass (It gives her personal life well without going to deep in addition to giving good in dive but yet the summary point of view in her political activities, again since she had a relatively normal executive position, the in-depth dive wouldn't be necessary as the extent of Presidents or Secretaries of State for example (Even for them broad coverage at an extent is required), which this article balances in it's generalization, which is good in this article and it follows)
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass (Overall gives and leans more to the objective factual side rather than lean towards any political or social ideological views of either sides: it gives occurrences, political events, social events and such and responses of such rather than opinion and only opinion which follows
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)
5. Stable?: Pass (No edit wars or conflict regarding article material, only minor edits)
6. Images?: Pass (Reasons:All images have valid copyright tags that meet Wikipedia's Copyright and a non-free rational use: All images are
Public Domain or
Creative Commons licensed images or audiovisual)
@
Another Believer I am ready to help but failing this review is obviously not an immediate solution. Its still very much early in the process. Lets sort it out all and see if we can get it promoted to GA status. Regards
MSincccc (
talk)
16:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I think the Cultural depictions article should be kept and expanded, and the parent article (Ivanka Trump) should have a brief summary of cultural depictions. You've said you're ready to help, but from my perspective, all you've done is merged "my" content re: cultural depictions without attribution, flagged a page I've worked on for deletion, and reverted my trimmed version of the cultural depictions from
Ivanka Trump. Not exactly constructive collaboration... ---
Another Believer(
Talk)16:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Another Believer Lets focus on the present. Now that we know each other I hope the two of us can together work towards a successful GA as soon as possible. Let me know of any changes you wish to make and do make any changes you think are constructive and will take us to our desired goal. Regards
MSincccc (
talk)
16:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I did. I trimmed the Cultural depictions section at Ivanka Trump because I think the
Ivanka Trump article only needs a brief summary of
Cultural depictions of Ivanka Trump. If you want to collaborate, then I would ask you to: 1) remove the PROD tag, 2) trim the Cultural depictions section, and 3) expand the Cultural depictions article (if you feel inclined). Otherwise, no other editors have supported your effort to merge/delete, and actually Randy Kryn reverted your merge, so the onus is on you to get consensus to merge. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)16:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Another Believer PROD tag has been removed. Would like to know from you just how much needs to be trimmed from the Cultural depictions section of the main article. As for the third proposal, it has nothing to do with the GA review as long as it covers sufficient amount of information on her cultural depictions. I would be happy to help. Regards
MSincccc (
talk)
17:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I consider the 'cultural depictions' issue resolved for now, but I am not interested in reviewing the rest of the article, nor do I care about Ivanka Trump ---
Another Believer(
Talk)17:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Nice job getting this article to GA! It's very well-written and put together and I think the hook is rather interesting, although I would perhaps drop "holds the distinction of being" in favour of "was", just for the sake of concision.
Grnrchst (
talk)
12:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Grnrchst Then you are most welcome to make the changes. Thanks for your appreciation but this could not have been possible without the reviewer CtasACT and user Another Believer who helped me with making the necessary changes.
None of which precede the edit by Gilliam in 2005 but don't offer Wikipedia as a source as mentioned in my earlier example above (and which also appears in a lot of other sources). Not definitive, but
People is at
WP:RSPS and given the subject of the article (Family Tree: All About...) I think we can use it?
microbiologyMarcuspetri dish·
growths13:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The risk is that "reliable sources" often repeat unsourced information already in Wikipedia, leaving us to wonder if the information, especially if published after it was introduced in Wikipedia, was truly vetted.—
Bagumba (
talk)
23:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply