![]() | A Certain Magical Index has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 14, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from A Certain Magical Index appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 August 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Magicalindex.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Just curious, why To Aru and not Toaru? I thought Toaru was one word. - 29dupe 12:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
The dictionaries I've consulted list と或る as a single entry, even though と is indeed a particle here. Writing it as "to aru" gives the impression that "aru" is the familiar verb "to exist", which it clearly is not, and is deceptive. It should also be noted that Japanese does not follow Western concepts of word breaks, so the distinction "to aru/toaru" is somewhat arbitrary; the fact that it begins with a kana followed by a kanji means little. For these reasons I personally would prefer to see the deceptive "to aru" decision reversed, especially as just about everywhere else uses "toaru" — in other words, in Google searches, Wikipedia's entry is the one that never shows up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.84.28 ( talk) 19:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
'which it clearly is not': In what way? If I understand correctly, To Aru [Magical Index] means 'A Certain Magical Index' because it literally means 'An existing Magical Index'. Perhaps one might say that the To makes it a 'A Magical Index which exists' rather than 'Existing Magical Index', but that's exceeding the bounds of my familiarity slightly. Though it is only my personal impression, writing Toaru gives the impression that a separate verb Toaru (like Tooru) exists, whereas 'To' seems to still strongly hold its place as a particle. ...for another case of To not being used to mean 'and' directly, perhaps consider cases such as 'Konna koto ga atta to ha omowanakatta...' and the like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.184.92 ( talk) 22:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
A further note, about Google searches mentioned: '"Toaru Majutsu no Index"' gives about three million results while '"To Aru Majutsu no Index" -Toaru' gives about 26 million results, and '"To Aru Majutsu no Index"' alone gives the Toaru results as well with about 28 million results total. It's definitely searching by Toaru rather than To Aru that is the problem then, isn't it...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.184.92 ( talk) 22:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Shoudln't it be mentioned somewhere that the actual japanese reads To Aru Majutsu no Kinsho Mokuroku? -- 81.241.26.148 ( talk) 11:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
The original soundtrack (click on the cover image) implies that the series's proper name is Index Librorum Prohibitorum [note that the Japanese name for the Index is "禁書目録" (Kinsho Mokuroku), meaning "とある魔術の禁書目録" can be translated as "A Certain Index Librorum Prohibitorum of Magic"]. Anyway, my point is, should the page be moved or adjusted in any way?-- Loveはドコ? ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
When the To Aru Kagaku no Railgun article is created on Wikipedia, should all references to it on this article be removed, or should links be attached?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.62.148 ( talk • contribs)
So far in the manga the storyline diverges from the plot of To Aru Majutsu no Index. It focuses on the ties between Misaka, Kuroko, Saten and Uiharu and includes many characters who don't appear in To Aru Majutsu no Index. Magic, and the Church, which both play major roles in the plot of To Aru Majutsu no Index, has not appeared either. Thus I feel that it deserves its own article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.10.165 ( talk) 20:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I think Toaru Kagaku no Railgun (Anime) need to be an individual article. I've watched each episode of it, and found that its connection to Toaru Majutsu no Index is minor, and quite different to the same titled Manga. "Railgun" and "Index" do share a few characters, and both happen in the same city, but from an Anime fan's perspective, it is not feasible to merge Toaru Kagaku no Railgun (Anime) to this article. VirtBM ( talk) 21:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
---aronlee90 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aronlee90 ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Article Split - "Railgun" is now confirmed to be getting a 2nd season, and has it's own manga with 50+ volumes. I think it would be time to strongly re-consider an article split from "Magical Index". It will just be more work if it is done after the next series is out. 24.11.146.90 ( talk) 11:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was Support. Sxerks ( talk) 21:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
To Aru Majutsu no Index →
Toaru Majutsu no Index — - On the debate of whether とある in the title should be "Toaru" or "To Aru," the article has settled on "To Aru" on the assumption that they are two separate words. Indeed, one notices a similarity in the definition of "とある" and "ある" (aru), however, there are two issues with "to aru." (A) both
Daijisen
[2] and
Daijirin
[3] give a single entry for "とある", and (B) what would "To" mean if the pronunciation was a separate word? It wouldn't be "and," or any other definition listed
at wiktionary. "Toaru" spelling is not uncommon, however one reason I am putting this up for discussion is because the article title has been "To Aru" for a long time now. --
Tokek (
talk) 16:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
The "common name" is a wash, and the particle argument is leaning toward a full word. Also, when ever it is licensed and the page is moved again(to 'A Certain Magical Index', or 'Project Index', or whatever) the original phrase (toaru...)will still be in the body of the article, so it will still need to be corrected.-- Sxerks ( talk) 21:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
First, sorry to Aervanath for undoing your closure, I was waiting on emails. The following should end in a move consensus, and remove this from the backlog shortly.
The first email reply is from Hikosaemon
This has very good analysis of the usage of Toaru. It also alludes to another literal translation of "A Magical Index" (which makes more sense in English, but isn't part of the current discussion)
The second email reply is from Daniel DeLorme at ANN. (I sent the email on the 17th, it took a week for the responce)
If you go to ANN you will notice that they have changed the name.
On a side note, Doceirias you should contact him about your Dulalala concern, they will take the time to research matters when prompted.
Are there any more concerns?-- Sxerks ( talk) 19:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Consensus is then considered Support-- Sxerks ( talk) 21:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't think that Imagine Breaker only has the power to disable supernatural things, it is also capable of defensing explosions, etc. which has been shown many times in both the animes (main and side-story). Hence the sub-section Imagine Breaker should be modified. -30/Dec/09-21:28(IST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.20.121 ( talk) 15:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
In terms of anime, has there been any indication that the anime of Toaru Kagaku no Railgun has been titled A Certain Scientific Railgun for its english release (as only the manga has been confirmed for such a name change). Wonchop ( talk) 21:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
In a related query, since Funimation have licensed the Index anime under the name, 'A Certain Magical Index', should we change the other articles as suit or just leave it as 'Toaru'? Bearing in mind that pretty much noone licenses light novels much these days. Wonchop ( talk) 21:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Since we normally use the English title anyway, I was wondering why the article is at "Toaru Majutsu no Index" rather than "A Certain Magical Index" (which is its English translation anyway). But before moving, we should probably first have a move discussion like the one above. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 23:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv ( talk) 12:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Toaru Majutsu no Index → A Certain Magical Index – The anime series was recently licensed by Funimation and will be distributed under the title A Certain Magical Index. There has been a convention in WP:ANIME to change the article title to the officially recognized English title when it becomes available per the guidelines WP:EN and WP:UCN. This is laid out at WP:MOS-AM#Article names and disambiguation too. 十 八 20:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.ok just asking but how did anyone count 25 volumes in the original light novel series?? no matter how i count it's just 22, even with the 2 ss it's only 24? ..:: Gradient93::.. 22:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bsgcafe\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
The Kazuma Kamachi link redirects here. Shouldn't it be high time for the author to get his own article page instead of a redirect? You know, since he has works other than Index.--- 125.60.240.201 ( talk) 16:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
The introduction is full of dates and numbers, it should be simply saying what this is, maybe can move these facts elsewhere where they can be formatted a bit nicer.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on A Certain Magical Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on A Certain Magical Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Right now this term redirects here, but I think it might be notable on its own. Of course, we can't rely on wikia ( [10]) but the term has been used in official Crunchroll materials [11]/ [12]. Overall we need a disambig at least, and preferably an article, that discusses this entire franchise. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:A Certain Magical Index (season 2) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
I'll review this article.
Tintor2 (
talk) 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Link20XX: Other than that, the article is easy to understand. Revise this and I'll gladly pass it. Tintor2 ( talk) 18:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Desertarun (
talk) 10:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Improved to good article status by Link20XX ( talk) and Centcom08 ( talk). Nominated by Link20XX ( talk) at 02:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC).
![]() | A Certain Magical Index has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 14, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from A Certain Magical Index appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 August 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Magicalindex.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Just curious, why To Aru and not Toaru? I thought Toaru was one word. - 29dupe 12:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
The dictionaries I've consulted list と或る as a single entry, even though と is indeed a particle here. Writing it as "to aru" gives the impression that "aru" is the familiar verb "to exist", which it clearly is not, and is deceptive. It should also be noted that Japanese does not follow Western concepts of word breaks, so the distinction "to aru/toaru" is somewhat arbitrary; the fact that it begins with a kana followed by a kanji means little. For these reasons I personally would prefer to see the deceptive "to aru" decision reversed, especially as just about everywhere else uses "toaru" — in other words, in Google searches, Wikipedia's entry is the one that never shows up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.84.28 ( talk) 19:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
'which it clearly is not': In what way? If I understand correctly, To Aru [Magical Index] means 'A Certain Magical Index' because it literally means 'An existing Magical Index'. Perhaps one might say that the To makes it a 'A Magical Index which exists' rather than 'Existing Magical Index', but that's exceeding the bounds of my familiarity slightly. Though it is only my personal impression, writing Toaru gives the impression that a separate verb Toaru (like Tooru) exists, whereas 'To' seems to still strongly hold its place as a particle. ...for another case of To not being used to mean 'and' directly, perhaps consider cases such as 'Konna koto ga atta to ha omowanakatta...' and the like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.184.92 ( talk) 22:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
A further note, about Google searches mentioned: '"Toaru Majutsu no Index"' gives about three million results while '"To Aru Majutsu no Index" -Toaru' gives about 26 million results, and '"To Aru Majutsu no Index"' alone gives the Toaru results as well with about 28 million results total. It's definitely searching by Toaru rather than To Aru that is the problem then, isn't it...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.184.92 ( talk) 22:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Shoudln't it be mentioned somewhere that the actual japanese reads To Aru Majutsu no Kinsho Mokuroku? -- 81.241.26.148 ( talk) 11:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
The original soundtrack (click on the cover image) implies that the series's proper name is Index Librorum Prohibitorum [note that the Japanese name for the Index is "禁書目録" (Kinsho Mokuroku), meaning "とある魔術の禁書目録" can be translated as "A Certain Index Librorum Prohibitorum of Magic"]. Anyway, my point is, should the page be moved or adjusted in any way?-- Loveはドコ? ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
When the To Aru Kagaku no Railgun article is created on Wikipedia, should all references to it on this article be removed, or should links be attached?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.62.148 ( talk • contribs)
So far in the manga the storyline diverges from the plot of To Aru Majutsu no Index. It focuses on the ties between Misaka, Kuroko, Saten and Uiharu and includes many characters who don't appear in To Aru Majutsu no Index. Magic, and the Church, which both play major roles in the plot of To Aru Majutsu no Index, has not appeared either. Thus I feel that it deserves its own article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.10.165 ( talk) 20:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I think Toaru Kagaku no Railgun (Anime) need to be an individual article. I've watched each episode of it, and found that its connection to Toaru Majutsu no Index is minor, and quite different to the same titled Manga. "Railgun" and "Index" do share a few characters, and both happen in the same city, but from an Anime fan's perspective, it is not feasible to merge Toaru Kagaku no Railgun (Anime) to this article. VirtBM ( talk) 21:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
---aronlee90 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aronlee90 ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Article Split - "Railgun" is now confirmed to be getting a 2nd season, and has it's own manga with 50+ volumes. I think it would be time to strongly re-consider an article split from "Magical Index". It will just be more work if it is done after the next series is out. 24.11.146.90 ( talk) 11:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was Support. Sxerks ( talk) 21:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
To Aru Majutsu no Index →
Toaru Majutsu no Index — - On the debate of whether とある in the title should be "Toaru" or "To Aru," the article has settled on "To Aru" on the assumption that they are two separate words. Indeed, one notices a similarity in the definition of "とある" and "ある" (aru), however, there are two issues with "to aru." (A) both
Daijisen
[2] and
Daijirin
[3] give a single entry for "とある", and (B) what would "To" mean if the pronunciation was a separate word? It wouldn't be "and," or any other definition listed
at wiktionary. "Toaru" spelling is not uncommon, however one reason I am putting this up for discussion is because the article title has been "To Aru" for a long time now. --
Tokek (
talk) 16:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
The "common name" is a wash, and the particle argument is leaning toward a full word. Also, when ever it is licensed and the page is moved again(to 'A Certain Magical Index', or 'Project Index', or whatever) the original phrase (toaru...)will still be in the body of the article, so it will still need to be corrected.-- Sxerks ( talk) 21:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
First, sorry to Aervanath for undoing your closure, I was waiting on emails. The following should end in a move consensus, and remove this from the backlog shortly.
The first email reply is from Hikosaemon
This has very good analysis of the usage of Toaru. It also alludes to another literal translation of "A Magical Index" (which makes more sense in English, but isn't part of the current discussion)
The second email reply is from Daniel DeLorme at ANN. (I sent the email on the 17th, it took a week for the responce)
If you go to ANN you will notice that they have changed the name.
On a side note, Doceirias you should contact him about your Dulalala concern, they will take the time to research matters when prompted.
Are there any more concerns?-- Sxerks ( talk) 19:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Consensus is then considered Support-- Sxerks ( talk) 21:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't think that Imagine Breaker only has the power to disable supernatural things, it is also capable of defensing explosions, etc. which has been shown many times in both the animes (main and side-story). Hence the sub-section Imagine Breaker should be modified. -30/Dec/09-21:28(IST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.20.121 ( talk) 15:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
In terms of anime, has there been any indication that the anime of Toaru Kagaku no Railgun has been titled A Certain Scientific Railgun for its english release (as only the manga has been confirmed for such a name change). Wonchop ( talk) 21:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
In a related query, since Funimation have licensed the Index anime under the name, 'A Certain Magical Index', should we change the other articles as suit or just leave it as 'Toaru'? Bearing in mind that pretty much noone licenses light novels much these days. Wonchop ( talk) 21:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Since we normally use the English title anyway, I was wondering why the article is at "Toaru Majutsu no Index" rather than "A Certain Magical Index" (which is its English translation anyway). But before moving, we should probably first have a move discussion like the one above. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 23:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv ( talk) 12:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Toaru Majutsu no Index → A Certain Magical Index – The anime series was recently licensed by Funimation and will be distributed under the title A Certain Magical Index. There has been a convention in WP:ANIME to change the article title to the officially recognized English title when it becomes available per the guidelines WP:EN and WP:UCN. This is laid out at WP:MOS-AM#Article names and disambiguation too. 十 八 20:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.ok just asking but how did anyone count 25 volumes in the original light novel series?? no matter how i count it's just 22, even with the 2 ss it's only 24? ..:: Gradient93::.. 22:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bsgcafe\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
The Kazuma Kamachi link redirects here. Shouldn't it be high time for the author to get his own article page instead of a redirect? You know, since he has works other than Index.--- 125.60.240.201 ( talk) 16:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
The introduction is full of dates and numbers, it should be simply saying what this is, maybe can move these facts elsewhere where they can be formatted a bit nicer.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on A Certain Magical Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on A Certain Magical Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Right now this term redirects here, but I think it might be notable on its own. Of course, we can't rely on wikia ( [10]) but the term has been used in official Crunchroll materials [11]/ [12]. Overall we need a disambig at least, and preferably an article, that discusses this entire franchise. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:A Certain Magical Index (season 2) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
I'll review this article.
Tintor2 (
talk) 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Link20XX: Other than that, the article is easy to understand. Revise this and I'll gladly pass it. Tintor2 ( talk) 18:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Desertarun (
talk) 10:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Improved to good article status by Link20XX ( talk) and Centcom08 ( talk). Nominated by Link20XX ( talk) at 02:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC).