This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 |
Hello everyone, the Ditchling Museum of Art + Craft are hosting an editathon on Saturday 1 June from 11am to 4pm UK time. The aim of the day is to improve biographies of female artists and makers, and there will be training led by a Wikimedia UK accredited trainer for those new to editing. If you're in the area, you're more than welcome to come along to this free event. And you are of course also welcome to take part remotely. Richard Nevell (WMUK) ( talk) 13:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
PKM, thank you for the Wikidata work you did for WP:WikiProject 1000 Women in Religion! I'd like to get a Wikidata-generated redlist to show the redlinks for this new wikiproject. Currently, we have this, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/1000 Women in Religion, which is "crowd-sourced". Below the information currently contained on that list, I'd like to add Wikidata-generated info for their wikiproject. The expanded list would look like this one, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Suffragists. The Wikidata-generated list would have columns for: #, name, image, description, country of citizenship, date of birth, date of death, place of birth, place of death, item, site links. Is this something you or Tagishsimon (or anyone else with time/inclination/know-how) could do? The next 1000 Women in Religion event will be in Vancouner on June 12th ( Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver/1000 Women in Religion 2019), so it would be ideal if the redlist task were completed before then. Thank you in advance. (cc: Dzingle1 who is facilitating the Vancouver event) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Tagishsimon or anyone else who has time/inclination/know-how... We have this Wikidata list, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/BBC 100 Women 2018, which only contains the 2018 honorees; and this website-generated list, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/BBC 100 Women redlinks, whose data should be moved into Wikidata. I think it would be best if we could solidify everything into a Wikidata-generated list with the name: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/BBC 100 Women, which would also include: the year they were honored, year of death, country of citizenship, place of birth, place of death, number of sitelinks. No rush, as the next group of honorees won't be announced until November/December, but I would be grateful if someone could manage this task as what we have now is a bit messy. Thank you in advance. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Right then; this 12-year-old up-and-coming leader needs an article. There are by now plenty of reliable sources about Lucy Gray, so WP:GNG is fine. I've compiled the most important ones in this tweet. Would write it myself but I've known her for a few years so that's a WP:CoI. MurielMary, is that something that could interest you? Schwede 66 21:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
I can do this one quickly. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 13:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
New FPs
Passing, and thus about to be FPs
There will likely be more nominated soon, but this seemed a good time to clear the boards, as it were. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 14:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm not always sure what I think about some of the issues related to abortion. Anyhow, I'm male. But I do know it's coming back up the political agenda stateside just now, and there's an intriguing deletion discussion going on which seems to have attracted a lot of contributions here. Regards Charles01 ( talk) 18:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I think someone here told us about a widget which displays wikilinks in different colors, e.g. redirects display green. I've enabled that function, but a friend ( user:Gamaliel) is asking how to do it and I don't remember. Help? -- Rosiestep ( talk) 23:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Can people look at Alva Belmont and tell me if I should crop a bit from the top of the lead image? Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 21:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
I've just come across this recent article on Inclusipedia by Isabella Fincher with details of progress on writing Wikipedia articles on people (mainly women) from Boulder. (cc Megan3532)-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Uppsala Cathedral by Emma Schenson ran on the main page on the 22nd. Now, the blurb didn't really focus on her so much as the cathedral, mentioning her in he third or fourth paragraph and in the credit.
Her views still spiked, giving her more attention than she had gotten in literally the year before that day.
Ones that focus on the person seem to be even more effective. Consider, for example, Mary Cassatt, Billie Holiday, Katie Swan, Hester C. Jeffrey.
FPs are buried down the mainpage a bit, but they're still pretty effective. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 14:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi WikiProject!
Since last fall, Wiki Education and the National Archives (NARA) have teamed up to run a series of professional development courses training historians, librarians, archivists, and independent scholars/researchers to contribute to women's suffrage topics on Wikipedia (much in the same spirit as Women in Red's Focus on Suffrage). This month, seven alumni from those courses have come together for an advanced Wikipedia course. Together, we've been taking a deep dive into a key article for the subject: the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It's coming along really well so far, we think, and we will continue to work on it over the next week or so. We have tentative plans to submit it to GAN soon thereafter. There's still work to be done, but this seems like a good time to put out this invitation to other interested Wikipedians to take a look, provide feedback, edit, etc.! :) -- Ryan (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 21:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
My inclination is to keep the carte-de-visite mount here. Any counterpoints? Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 01:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Anyone fancy writing a biography of Zura Karuhimbi? [1] Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Found some additional sources, in case anyone wants to add to the redlists. (I'd help, but I've got a lot on my plate these next few weeks.)
Hopefully these may be of some use. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 18:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I've received a few requests over the years from female BLP subjects to remove their years of birth, because of the ageism women experience, especially in the entertainment industry. It can lead to problems writing the biography: if you remove year of birth, do you also have to remove when they left high school, when they were awarded their first degree, and so on?
I opened a BLPN thread about it in October, but there was no consensus. At the moment, WP:BLPPRIVACY says: "If a subject complains about our inclusion of their date of birth, or the person is borderline notable, err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it."
I was wondering whether WiR regulars had encountered this issue, and how you handle it, or whether you had any suggestions. SarahSV (talk) 01:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
...I don't like doing featured picture reports unless either all in the previous one have cleared out, or we have at least three new nominations.
...This is the fun kind of FP report.
So! Aletta Jacobs and Ray Strachey have passed, and the other three that were passing still are. But more exciting are the new ones, including a couple heavy hitters:
Alva Belmont is one of the better-known suffragettes, having founded several organisations, including the National Women's Party. This one's passing.
Séverine was a French journalist, anarchist, and feminist. She was painted by Renoir, helped found the International League against Anti-Semitism, which proved to be pretty useful during WWII, and is amongst my list of people I'd love to meet and share a pint with. Oh - while it doesn't really matter, of course - holder of incredible fashion sense. This is amongst my favourite of my restorations visually, for that amazing dress.
Pauline Adams was one of the suffragettes who went to jail because that made for better publicity, were treated abominably... and, in her case, then appealed the decision and won, getting the police and trial heavily criticised. When women's suffrage finally came to fruition, she decided to become a lawyer. So did.
I don't appreciate her fashion sense quite as much, because all those tiny grid patterns were absolute nightmares to fix damage over. (Mostly joking, of course. It was difficult, but that's hardly a criticism of her)
Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 03:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
I created a page for actress Lola Lane after seeing her name among those in red on one of this project's pages. I encountered a problem with the title, however, because both "Lola Lane" and "Lola Lane (actress)" are redirected to Lane Sisters. Not knowing how to change the redirects, I named the new page Lola Lane (actress/singer). That title is a bit awkward; if anyone can tell me how to change it to just her name without conflicting with the redirect, I will appreciate the help. Eddie Blick ( talk) 21:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
The Oslo Freedom Forum is starting on Monday and there's quite a selection of women whose biographies could be written or improved if anyone has time. - Yupik ( talk) 23:45, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure how many of these women would pass notability on the en-wiki, in spite of them all being awesome. But I'm putting them up here in the hopes that WIR could create articles for them that would not get deleted because the lot of you rock :) - Yupik ( talk) 00:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Two or three weeks ago, Elena Gómez from the program Relatoras on M21Madrid radio came and intervieweed a number of participants at the weekly women's editing workshop run by PatriHorrillo's Wikiesfera group. :) Interview here in Spanish. Focus of the interviews was on the work being done by Wikiesfera and why women participate in the group, with lots of talk about the feminist aspect of empowering women through providing information and making women visible. :) (I have been told I appear at some point.) -- LauraHale ( talk) 08:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Every 2 weeks on Tuesday we organize in Brussels an edit-a-thon about well-known women not having an article on Wikipedia yet. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Belgium/Wiki Club Brussels for more details. We have been writing about the 50 Worldwide and European Forbes list, and are currently using the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Redlist index. Our (mainly) ladies (and some men) are writing in the en.wp, fr.wp, and nl.wp, and we also amend Wikidata items. Geertivp ( talk) 18:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
As I posted in a section above, a group of editors has been working hard to apply Good Article criteria to the article on the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Collectively, they've made more than 350 edits, increasing the size of the article from 35k to 91k in the process. We're all really happy with the improvements and the state of the article in general, so last night I sent it off to GAN. Just in time for the centennial of the Amendment being passed in the Senate (which is today)! :)
Although there are no current plans to bring it to FAC (that I know of), it would be great to hear the reviewer's (or others') input regarding things that could be improved down the road, even if unnecessary for GAN. -- Ryan (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 14:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey all. I created about 56 articles about abortion in the United States on a state and territory level over the course of about 10 days, mainspacing them on Thursday. They are linked in the template below.
I was wondering if any people involved with this project could be able to help improve these articles, making sure they read neutrally, fixing up spelling, grammar and structure issues and adding content... especially content about more recent developments. I had kind of hoped to put off main spacing articles to give myself more time to work on them but things felt like they were moving so fast that I wanted them main spaced so more people could work on them. And yeah. :) Any assistance appreciated as no matter where you fall in terms of your beliefs as it relates to the topic, it benefits everyone in living in those states to have a neutral well referenced information resource. -- LauraHale ( talk) 11:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi all,
I'll be at BookExpo [2] / BookCon [3] for the next couple days with my camera. Last year's event was relatively productive, so I'm looking forward to going back. If you know of articles about current authors missing pictures, check those websites. If they'll be there, ping me with the names and I'll try my best. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks all. After day 1, I already have an obscene number of pictures to work through later. The conditions are such that I suspect no FPs will come out of it (crowded, fast-moving, messy backgrounds, and poorer lighting than one would think -- especially, for some reason, on the stages/panels). My approach is typically to wind through the aisles taking pictures of just about every author doing a signing, then going down to the autographing tables, and then repeating the process because the authors cycle every 30-60 minutes. BookExpo is through tomorrow, then BookCon is Sat/Sun. I can try to find some on Nick's list over the weekend, but I was more thinking that if someone knew of one or two in particular I could search for them. Otherwise my scattershot approach will cover some of them regardless. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I've just uploaded the first batch from day 1 of BookExpo here for anyone interested: commons:Category:Photographs taken by Rhododendrites - BookExpo and BookCon 2019. Haven't had time to categorize or add to any articles yet -- will probably have to wait until sometime next week. Two more days to go. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Caitlin Zaloom at BookExpo (05471).jpg is my favourite, though Caitlin Zaloom will need an article. She had one deleted in 2006, but it was A. copyvio and B. Over a decade ago so I don't think we're bound by its precedent if we have sources. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 00:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC) File:Maaza Mengiste at BookExpo (05586) (cropped).jpg is probably my second-favourite, and Maaza Mengiste's article is pretty developed. That'd be a good FPC once it's settled in. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 00:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 01:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC) And don't forget Wikidata! This can quickly move a good image into loads of small wikis. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 01:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
One more update: everything has now been uploaded. Thanks for the kind words and to those of you who have helped categorize files or add to articles. I've done some more of that tonight (and adding to Wikidata), and will probably finish up sometime tomorrow. Sad to say I was only able to find two of the people from the list above while I was there: Armentrout and Dennard. I could've sworn I took pictures of Roanhorse but looking back now I think I may have connected the sign with the wrong table... :( Next time. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, Adam. I had the same reaction to some of them, e.g. disappointment that Zaloom doesn't have an article (as an aside, I feel for the academic authors who go to these things -- it's hard for history and journalism to compete for attention with scifi and YA fantasy :) ). I have a bit of a bad habit in terms of composition because I tend to like the shots where there's a blurry person in the foreground off to the side that the author is looking at. I feel like it sets the scene and can be good with the right depth of field. I appreciate that most people don't agree with me, though. :) A couple others I think have some potential are RJ Palacio and maybe Karine Jean-Pierre or Marcia Butler (but chaotic background in both, and hard-to-crop-out foreground person with the latter). We'll see. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Sigh. I am reminded that enwiki's FPC process just isn't the place for me. Apparently going to an event to take pictures of people who don't have pictures on Wikipedia is "promotional", and the sole picture of a notable author does not have encyclopedic value. As I said, the conditions were such that I'd be surprised if a FP were to come out of it, so I don't mind them not being promoted, but, well, it's admittedly disheartening that a single person's bizarre opinion that this whole exercise isn't worth doing counts just as much as anything else... meh. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
I've created a stub for astrophysicist Jean P. Brodie, with a hatnote on Jean Brodie: she appears in the redlist of astronomers as Jean Brodie (Q59670724). What if anything do I need to do to get her linked into Wikidata and blue-d in or removed from that list of redlinks? Thanks. Pam D 21:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Army National Guard Brig. Gen. Laura Yeager is slated to become the first female active duty or Guard general officer to lead a combat infantry division. — Maile ( talk) 12:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Could I have a little bit of a hand cleaning this up and improving it? It's my first new article in a while. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 18:20, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
List of filmmakers here. Not sure how many of the women listed are notable - my sense is that it's 50-50 at best, given a cursory glance. But film isn't really my thing, so I thought I'd bring it here in the event that it might be of interest to someone else. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 03:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
All previously-mentioned FPs from the last two reports have passed, except Pauline Adams, which I'll work on the cup of and renominate. We also have two of Rhododendrites's wonderful images
Featured picture candidates/Nic Stone is probably not going to pass. People rather turned on it for.. um... having a non-smile expression and having text in the background. This is fairly stupid, but there you go.
RJ Palacio is almost passing. Same sort of weird complaints about text in the background, but almost has enough supports to outweigh them.
Do I still need to give the "not a guide to voting" spiel? Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 13:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC) Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 13:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
An article by Rosamund Urwin in todays Sunday Times titled " Male Wiki editors deleting women, says Toksvig" tells us that Sandi Toksvig, co-founder of the Women's Equality Party, is to tour the UK, Australia and America, encouraging "every audience member to commit to adopting one woman and making sure her entry [on Wikipedia] is correct or to inputting a new person". She is to be interviewed by the former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard on Wednesday in "A Podcast of One's Own".-- Ipigott ( talk) 09:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
I've just created an article for Emma Brossard, a noted expert on the oil industry in Venezuela - I hope it is in decent enough shape to avoid deletion. I post here since I am of the other gender and may have missed important elements. I had trouble finding any obituary at all, for example, and Brossard's birthdate and even year of death remain elusive to me. I believe she had three children - one can note the gap between her A.B. (1950) and her PhD (1970). Her work and reputation were quite good, I believe, but one can see she bounced around for a few years at (with all due respect!) minor colleges/universities before landing at LSU. Anyhow, any attention anyone can give to the article would be appreciated. My interest in Brossard is through San Tome, Venezuela. Bdushaw ( talk) 08:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
I need help from Adam Cuerden or someone who is an expert with photographs for the class A review on the Inter-Allied Women's Conference. I am in way over my head and don't know how to move forward. Research I can do, knowing what tags to use is confusing and unclear. SusunW ( talk) 14:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Could you please remove the red links for Elizabeth Chitty and Cyndra MacDowall. When I created the pages they turned blue but are back to red. No sure why that happened. Also created a new page for Brenda Longfellow. The link is blue but not sure if it will change back as well. Also, can someone take a look at Brenda Longfellow. It has not received any modifications so am concerned that there is something that prevents others from seeing it/or it was created incorrectly. Thanks! LorriBrown ( talk) 22:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi all
Someone has asked me to take a look at their rejected submission for an article Draft:Dalia Leinartė, if anyone has any suggestions of how to improve it please do add things, currently looking for more references. I feel like its basically ready to be published.
Thanks
John Cummings ( talk) 17:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Somebody with an interest in astronomy may want to take a look at Draft:Aina Elvius before she gets deleted. -- Hegvald ( talk) 13:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
The Riddu Riđđu festival in July of this year has a lineup of strong indigenous women. I've riffed off of Jon Harald's list for Oslo Freedom Forum and created one of the lineup at Riddu Riđđu. Even though we have articles for some of the women on the list, quite a few of them could be expanded and updated. Also last year, they got massive amounts of good photos of the performers; hopefully this year will be the same! - Yupik ( talk) 01:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
There be work to do, set out at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Peace/Europride_Vienna_2019/Article_list and notably at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Peace/Europride_Vienna_2019/Article_list#50_European_LGBT+_activists ... twitter again, Ian: https://twitter.com/josiefraser/status/1138489465679372288 -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 15:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Our @Jess Wade writes #Wikipedia articles Every Day. Today she has a British Empire Medal in the #QueensBirthdayHonours AND she's #OnOurBanner at @Wikiwomeninred. Recognised for services to Gender Diversity in Science. Brilliant. Victuallers ( talk) 07:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Specifically at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_war_over_twitter_storm. DuncanHill ( talk) 23:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Also this [ [4]]. Slatersteven ( talk) 16:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
The article on the Latina muralist, Bernadette Vigil is up for deletion. Could someone with fresh eyes have a look over here: Articles_for_deletion/Bernadette_Vigil ? Thank you. Netherzone ( talk) 23:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
FYI, the recent Tweet from your project has been discussed at WP:FRAM. The Rambling Man ( talk) 22:44, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
I have made a statement to ArbCom about the tweets by your project's Twitter account. starship .paint ( talk) 03:35, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
I have added "Whoever operated the @WikiWomenInRed Twitter account to post about WP:FRAM" as one of the Involved parties to the ArbCom case on WJBScribe and related matters. starship .paint ( talk) 07:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
The use of the WiR twitter account has come up before. As a friend of this project, I hope I'm not out of line by commenting that those with access to the Twitter account may benefit from having a behind the scenes discussion about how to draw attention to issues without becoming part of the issues. Pointing to a discussion and highlighting evidence given by the WMF or even statements by others, would probably have been sufficient to make a point on Twitter. I think the fuss being made above and at the Arbcom case will go nowhere, but we can all take away some pointers for how to handle difficult communications in the future. For myself, I am thinking of how those of use with access to the WM-LGBT+ Twitterstream might need to agree some guidelines, rather than only relying on our common, common sense. -- Fæ ( talk) 09:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This is what I'd advocate for the account to tweet. Whether you want to listen is up to you: "CORRECTION: A deleted tweet by this account may have implied that real crimes were committed by Wikipedia user Fram. The wording in this tweet lacked precision. We apologize, and do not indicate that real crimes were committed." starship .paint ( talk) 02:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
I seem to recall that some members of this project had stopped participating in DYK because of the tedious and time-consuming process involved. I have created a script for creating DYK noms, User:SD0001/DYK-helper that makes the process easier. Except for the QPQ requirement in which I'm afraid I can't be of much help, the rest of the steps are now quite simplified. Any suggestions or feedback on the script is welcome and encouraged. SD0001 ( talk) 06:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
SoundGirls looks like the sort of article that's of interest here. Is there anything for tagging the talk: page on articles like that to indicate such relevance?
(Also, any editor effort is of course welcome) Andy Dingley ( talk) 14:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I've just created a stub on Xifeng Wu, a cancer epidemiologist who has been driven out of the United States by the FBI, if anybody wants to pitch in. Abductive ( reasoning) 00:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Saw this video by the University of Washington where it shows previous Women in Red monthly editathons plus interviews @ Rosiestep: -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 22:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
A new exhibit at the Minneapolis Institute of Art. Looks interesting - and it's coming to the Renwick Gallery next year, so I'll have a chance to see it. A cursory glance at a number of articles indicates there are a number of artists featured who lack articles. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a complete list of artists - if anyone knows how to develop one, I think it'd be quite useful. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 15:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi WiR, I've made improvements to the article on Roxanne Swentzell a Native American Santa Clara Pueblo sculptor. If someone could take a look at it, assess it, and consider changing the rating on the talk page Talk:Roxanne Swentzell from a start page to a C or even, if it looks like it, a B if it qualifies. Your feedback would be appreciated if you can find issues with the page that can still be improved. Thanks in advance! Netherzone ( talk) 13:34, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
FYI - https://projects.history.qmul.ac.uk/thehistorian/2019/06/20/hidden-figures/ -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 07:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.
There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:
Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:
Until next time,
-— Isarra ༆ 21:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Harini Iyengar AfD comments welcome. -- The Vintage Feminist ( talk) 23:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Patricia Mayorga was awarded the CPJ International Press Freedom Awards in 2017 needs translation from Spanish and can be expanded. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 06:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 |
Hello everyone, the Ditchling Museum of Art + Craft are hosting an editathon on Saturday 1 June from 11am to 4pm UK time. The aim of the day is to improve biographies of female artists and makers, and there will be training led by a Wikimedia UK accredited trainer for those new to editing. If you're in the area, you're more than welcome to come along to this free event. And you are of course also welcome to take part remotely. Richard Nevell (WMUK) ( talk) 13:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
PKM, thank you for the Wikidata work you did for WP:WikiProject 1000 Women in Religion! I'd like to get a Wikidata-generated redlist to show the redlinks for this new wikiproject. Currently, we have this, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/1000 Women in Religion, which is "crowd-sourced". Below the information currently contained on that list, I'd like to add Wikidata-generated info for their wikiproject. The expanded list would look like this one, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Suffragists. The Wikidata-generated list would have columns for: #, name, image, description, country of citizenship, date of birth, date of death, place of birth, place of death, item, site links. Is this something you or Tagishsimon (or anyone else with time/inclination/know-how) could do? The next 1000 Women in Religion event will be in Vancouner on June 12th ( Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver/1000 Women in Religion 2019), so it would be ideal if the redlist task were completed before then. Thank you in advance. (cc: Dzingle1 who is facilitating the Vancouver event) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Tagishsimon or anyone else who has time/inclination/know-how... We have this Wikidata list, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/BBC 100 Women 2018, which only contains the 2018 honorees; and this website-generated list, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/BBC 100 Women redlinks, whose data should be moved into Wikidata. I think it would be best if we could solidify everything into a Wikidata-generated list with the name: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/BBC 100 Women, which would also include: the year they were honored, year of death, country of citizenship, place of birth, place of death, number of sitelinks. No rush, as the next group of honorees won't be announced until November/December, but I would be grateful if someone could manage this task as what we have now is a bit messy. Thank you in advance. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Right then; this 12-year-old up-and-coming leader needs an article. There are by now plenty of reliable sources about Lucy Gray, so WP:GNG is fine. I've compiled the most important ones in this tweet. Would write it myself but I've known her for a few years so that's a WP:CoI. MurielMary, is that something that could interest you? Schwede 66 21:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
I can do this one quickly. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 13:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
New FPs
Passing, and thus about to be FPs
There will likely be more nominated soon, but this seemed a good time to clear the boards, as it were. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 14:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm not always sure what I think about some of the issues related to abortion. Anyhow, I'm male. But I do know it's coming back up the political agenda stateside just now, and there's an intriguing deletion discussion going on which seems to have attracted a lot of contributions here. Regards Charles01 ( talk) 18:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I think someone here told us about a widget which displays wikilinks in different colors, e.g. redirects display green. I've enabled that function, but a friend ( user:Gamaliel) is asking how to do it and I don't remember. Help? -- Rosiestep ( talk) 23:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Can people look at Alva Belmont and tell me if I should crop a bit from the top of the lead image? Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 21:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
I've just come across this recent article on Inclusipedia by Isabella Fincher with details of progress on writing Wikipedia articles on people (mainly women) from Boulder. (cc Megan3532)-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Uppsala Cathedral by Emma Schenson ran on the main page on the 22nd. Now, the blurb didn't really focus on her so much as the cathedral, mentioning her in he third or fourth paragraph and in the credit.
Her views still spiked, giving her more attention than she had gotten in literally the year before that day.
Ones that focus on the person seem to be even more effective. Consider, for example, Mary Cassatt, Billie Holiday, Katie Swan, Hester C. Jeffrey.
FPs are buried down the mainpage a bit, but they're still pretty effective. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 14:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi WikiProject!
Since last fall, Wiki Education and the National Archives (NARA) have teamed up to run a series of professional development courses training historians, librarians, archivists, and independent scholars/researchers to contribute to women's suffrage topics on Wikipedia (much in the same spirit as Women in Red's Focus on Suffrage). This month, seven alumni from those courses have come together for an advanced Wikipedia course. Together, we've been taking a deep dive into a key article for the subject: the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It's coming along really well so far, we think, and we will continue to work on it over the next week or so. We have tentative plans to submit it to GAN soon thereafter. There's still work to be done, but this seems like a good time to put out this invitation to other interested Wikipedians to take a look, provide feedback, edit, etc.! :) -- Ryan (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 21:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
My inclination is to keep the carte-de-visite mount here. Any counterpoints? Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 01:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Anyone fancy writing a biography of Zura Karuhimbi? [1] Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Found some additional sources, in case anyone wants to add to the redlists. (I'd help, but I've got a lot on my plate these next few weeks.)
Hopefully these may be of some use. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 18:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I've received a few requests over the years from female BLP subjects to remove their years of birth, because of the ageism women experience, especially in the entertainment industry. It can lead to problems writing the biography: if you remove year of birth, do you also have to remove when they left high school, when they were awarded their first degree, and so on?
I opened a BLPN thread about it in October, but there was no consensus. At the moment, WP:BLPPRIVACY says: "If a subject complains about our inclusion of their date of birth, or the person is borderline notable, err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it."
I was wondering whether WiR regulars had encountered this issue, and how you handle it, or whether you had any suggestions. SarahSV (talk) 01:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
...I don't like doing featured picture reports unless either all in the previous one have cleared out, or we have at least three new nominations.
...This is the fun kind of FP report.
So! Aletta Jacobs and Ray Strachey have passed, and the other three that were passing still are. But more exciting are the new ones, including a couple heavy hitters:
Alva Belmont is one of the better-known suffragettes, having founded several organisations, including the National Women's Party. This one's passing.
Séverine was a French journalist, anarchist, and feminist. She was painted by Renoir, helped found the International League against Anti-Semitism, which proved to be pretty useful during WWII, and is amongst my list of people I'd love to meet and share a pint with. Oh - while it doesn't really matter, of course - holder of incredible fashion sense. This is amongst my favourite of my restorations visually, for that amazing dress.
Pauline Adams was one of the suffragettes who went to jail because that made for better publicity, were treated abominably... and, in her case, then appealed the decision and won, getting the police and trial heavily criticised. When women's suffrage finally came to fruition, she decided to become a lawyer. So did.
I don't appreciate her fashion sense quite as much, because all those tiny grid patterns were absolute nightmares to fix damage over. (Mostly joking, of course. It was difficult, but that's hardly a criticism of her)
Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 03:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
I created a page for actress Lola Lane after seeing her name among those in red on one of this project's pages. I encountered a problem with the title, however, because both "Lola Lane" and "Lola Lane (actress)" are redirected to Lane Sisters. Not knowing how to change the redirects, I named the new page Lola Lane (actress/singer). That title is a bit awkward; if anyone can tell me how to change it to just her name without conflicting with the redirect, I will appreciate the help. Eddie Blick ( talk) 21:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
The Oslo Freedom Forum is starting on Monday and there's quite a selection of women whose biographies could be written or improved if anyone has time. - Yupik ( talk) 23:45, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure how many of these women would pass notability on the en-wiki, in spite of them all being awesome. But I'm putting them up here in the hopes that WIR could create articles for them that would not get deleted because the lot of you rock :) - Yupik ( talk) 00:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Two or three weeks ago, Elena Gómez from the program Relatoras on M21Madrid radio came and intervieweed a number of participants at the weekly women's editing workshop run by PatriHorrillo's Wikiesfera group. :) Interview here in Spanish. Focus of the interviews was on the work being done by Wikiesfera and why women participate in the group, with lots of talk about the feminist aspect of empowering women through providing information and making women visible. :) (I have been told I appear at some point.) -- LauraHale ( talk) 08:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Every 2 weeks on Tuesday we organize in Brussels an edit-a-thon about well-known women not having an article on Wikipedia yet. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Belgium/Wiki Club Brussels for more details. We have been writing about the 50 Worldwide and European Forbes list, and are currently using the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Redlist index. Our (mainly) ladies (and some men) are writing in the en.wp, fr.wp, and nl.wp, and we also amend Wikidata items. Geertivp ( talk) 18:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
As I posted in a section above, a group of editors has been working hard to apply Good Article criteria to the article on the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Collectively, they've made more than 350 edits, increasing the size of the article from 35k to 91k in the process. We're all really happy with the improvements and the state of the article in general, so last night I sent it off to GAN. Just in time for the centennial of the Amendment being passed in the Senate (which is today)! :)
Although there are no current plans to bring it to FAC (that I know of), it would be great to hear the reviewer's (or others') input regarding things that could be improved down the road, even if unnecessary for GAN. -- Ryan (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 14:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey all. I created about 56 articles about abortion in the United States on a state and territory level over the course of about 10 days, mainspacing them on Thursday. They are linked in the template below.
I was wondering if any people involved with this project could be able to help improve these articles, making sure they read neutrally, fixing up spelling, grammar and structure issues and adding content... especially content about more recent developments. I had kind of hoped to put off main spacing articles to give myself more time to work on them but things felt like they were moving so fast that I wanted them main spaced so more people could work on them. And yeah. :) Any assistance appreciated as no matter where you fall in terms of your beliefs as it relates to the topic, it benefits everyone in living in those states to have a neutral well referenced information resource. -- LauraHale ( talk) 11:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi all,
I'll be at BookExpo [2] / BookCon [3] for the next couple days with my camera. Last year's event was relatively productive, so I'm looking forward to going back. If you know of articles about current authors missing pictures, check those websites. If they'll be there, ping me with the names and I'll try my best. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks all. After day 1, I already have an obscene number of pictures to work through later. The conditions are such that I suspect no FPs will come out of it (crowded, fast-moving, messy backgrounds, and poorer lighting than one would think -- especially, for some reason, on the stages/panels). My approach is typically to wind through the aisles taking pictures of just about every author doing a signing, then going down to the autographing tables, and then repeating the process because the authors cycle every 30-60 minutes. BookExpo is through tomorrow, then BookCon is Sat/Sun. I can try to find some on Nick's list over the weekend, but I was more thinking that if someone knew of one or two in particular I could search for them. Otherwise my scattershot approach will cover some of them regardless. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I've just uploaded the first batch from day 1 of BookExpo here for anyone interested: commons:Category:Photographs taken by Rhododendrites - BookExpo and BookCon 2019. Haven't had time to categorize or add to any articles yet -- will probably have to wait until sometime next week. Two more days to go. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Caitlin Zaloom at BookExpo (05471).jpg is my favourite, though Caitlin Zaloom will need an article. She had one deleted in 2006, but it was A. copyvio and B. Over a decade ago so I don't think we're bound by its precedent if we have sources. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 00:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC) File:Maaza Mengiste at BookExpo (05586) (cropped).jpg is probably my second-favourite, and Maaza Mengiste's article is pretty developed. That'd be a good FPC once it's settled in. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 00:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 01:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC) And don't forget Wikidata! This can quickly move a good image into loads of small wikis. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 01:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
One more update: everything has now been uploaded. Thanks for the kind words and to those of you who have helped categorize files or add to articles. I've done some more of that tonight (and adding to Wikidata), and will probably finish up sometime tomorrow. Sad to say I was only able to find two of the people from the list above while I was there: Armentrout and Dennard. I could've sworn I took pictures of Roanhorse but looking back now I think I may have connected the sign with the wrong table... :( Next time. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, Adam. I had the same reaction to some of them, e.g. disappointment that Zaloom doesn't have an article (as an aside, I feel for the academic authors who go to these things -- it's hard for history and journalism to compete for attention with scifi and YA fantasy :) ). I have a bit of a bad habit in terms of composition because I tend to like the shots where there's a blurry person in the foreground off to the side that the author is looking at. I feel like it sets the scene and can be good with the right depth of field. I appreciate that most people don't agree with me, though. :) A couple others I think have some potential are RJ Palacio and maybe Karine Jean-Pierre or Marcia Butler (but chaotic background in both, and hard-to-crop-out foreground person with the latter). We'll see. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Sigh. I am reminded that enwiki's FPC process just isn't the place for me. Apparently going to an event to take pictures of people who don't have pictures on Wikipedia is "promotional", and the sole picture of a notable author does not have encyclopedic value. As I said, the conditions were such that I'd be surprised if a FP were to come out of it, so I don't mind them not being promoted, but, well, it's admittedly disheartening that a single person's bizarre opinion that this whole exercise isn't worth doing counts just as much as anything else... meh. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
I've created a stub for astrophysicist Jean P. Brodie, with a hatnote on Jean Brodie: she appears in the redlist of astronomers as Jean Brodie (Q59670724). What if anything do I need to do to get her linked into Wikidata and blue-d in or removed from that list of redlinks? Thanks. Pam D 21:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Army National Guard Brig. Gen. Laura Yeager is slated to become the first female active duty or Guard general officer to lead a combat infantry division. — Maile ( talk) 12:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Could I have a little bit of a hand cleaning this up and improving it? It's my first new article in a while. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 18:20, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
List of filmmakers here. Not sure how many of the women listed are notable - my sense is that it's 50-50 at best, given a cursory glance. But film isn't really my thing, so I thought I'd bring it here in the event that it might be of interest to someone else. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 03:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
All previously-mentioned FPs from the last two reports have passed, except Pauline Adams, which I'll work on the cup of and renominate. We also have two of Rhododendrites's wonderful images
Featured picture candidates/Nic Stone is probably not going to pass. People rather turned on it for.. um... having a non-smile expression and having text in the background. This is fairly stupid, but there you go.
RJ Palacio is almost passing. Same sort of weird complaints about text in the background, but almost has enough supports to outweigh them.
Do I still need to give the "not a guide to voting" spiel? Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 13:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC) Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 13:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
An article by Rosamund Urwin in todays Sunday Times titled " Male Wiki editors deleting women, says Toksvig" tells us that Sandi Toksvig, co-founder of the Women's Equality Party, is to tour the UK, Australia and America, encouraging "every audience member to commit to adopting one woman and making sure her entry [on Wikipedia] is correct or to inputting a new person". She is to be interviewed by the former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard on Wednesday in "A Podcast of One's Own".-- Ipigott ( talk) 09:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
I've just created an article for Emma Brossard, a noted expert on the oil industry in Venezuela - I hope it is in decent enough shape to avoid deletion. I post here since I am of the other gender and may have missed important elements. I had trouble finding any obituary at all, for example, and Brossard's birthdate and even year of death remain elusive to me. I believe she had three children - one can note the gap between her A.B. (1950) and her PhD (1970). Her work and reputation were quite good, I believe, but one can see she bounced around for a few years at (with all due respect!) minor colleges/universities before landing at LSU. Anyhow, any attention anyone can give to the article would be appreciated. My interest in Brossard is through San Tome, Venezuela. Bdushaw ( talk) 08:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
I need help from Adam Cuerden or someone who is an expert with photographs for the class A review on the Inter-Allied Women's Conference. I am in way over my head and don't know how to move forward. Research I can do, knowing what tags to use is confusing and unclear. SusunW ( talk) 14:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Could you please remove the red links for Elizabeth Chitty and Cyndra MacDowall. When I created the pages they turned blue but are back to red. No sure why that happened. Also created a new page for Brenda Longfellow. The link is blue but not sure if it will change back as well. Also, can someone take a look at Brenda Longfellow. It has not received any modifications so am concerned that there is something that prevents others from seeing it/or it was created incorrectly. Thanks! LorriBrown ( talk) 22:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi all
Someone has asked me to take a look at their rejected submission for an article Draft:Dalia Leinartė, if anyone has any suggestions of how to improve it please do add things, currently looking for more references. I feel like its basically ready to be published.
Thanks
John Cummings ( talk) 17:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Somebody with an interest in astronomy may want to take a look at Draft:Aina Elvius before she gets deleted. -- Hegvald ( talk) 13:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
The Riddu Riđđu festival in July of this year has a lineup of strong indigenous women. I've riffed off of Jon Harald's list for Oslo Freedom Forum and created one of the lineup at Riddu Riđđu. Even though we have articles for some of the women on the list, quite a few of them could be expanded and updated. Also last year, they got massive amounts of good photos of the performers; hopefully this year will be the same! - Yupik ( talk) 01:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
There be work to do, set out at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Peace/Europride_Vienna_2019/Article_list and notably at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Peace/Europride_Vienna_2019/Article_list#50_European_LGBT+_activists ... twitter again, Ian: https://twitter.com/josiefraser/status/1138489465679372288 -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 15:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Our @Jess Wade writes #Wikipedia articles Every Day. Today she has a British Empire Medal in the #QueensBirthdayHonours AND she's #OnOurBanner at @Wikiwomeninred. Recognised for services to Gender Diversity in Science. Brilliant. Victuallers ( talk) 07:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Specifically at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_war_over_twitter_storm. DuncanHill ( talk) 23:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Also this [ [4]]. Slatersteven ( talk) 16:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
The article on the Latina muralist, Bernadette Vigil is up for deletion. Could someone with fresh eyes have a look over here: Articles_for_deletion/Bernadette_Vigil ? Thank you. Netherzone ( talk) 23:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
FYI, the recent Tweet from your project has been discussed at WP:FRAM. The Rambling Man ( talk) 22:44, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
I have made a statement to ArbCom about the tweets by your project's Twitter account. starship .paint ( talk) 03:35, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
I have added "Whoever operated the @WikiWomenInRed Twitter account to post about WP:FRAM" as one of the Involved parties to the ArbCom case on WJBScribe and related matters. starship .paint ( talk) 07:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
The use of the WiR twitter account has come up before. As a friend of this project, I hope I'm not out of line by commenting that those with access to the Twitter account may benefit from having a behind the scenes discussion about how to draw attention to issues without becoming part of the issues. Pointing to a discussion and highlighting evidence given by the WMF or even statements by others, would probably have been sufficient to make a point on Twitter. I think the fuss being made above and at the Arbcom case will go nowhere, but we can all take away some pointers for how to handle difficult communications in the future. For myself, I am thinking of how those of use with access to the WM-LGBT+ Twitterstream might need to agree some guidelines, rather than only relying on our common, common sense. -- Fæ ( talk) 09:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This is what I'd advocate for the account to tweet. Whether you want to listen is up to you: "CORRECTION: A deleted tweet by this account may have implied that real crimes were committed by Wikipedia user Fram. The wording in this tweet lacked precision. We apologize, and do not indicate that real crimes were committed." starship .paint ( talk) 02:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
I seem to recall that some members of this project had stopped participating in DYK because of the tedious and time-consuming process involved. I have created a script for creating DYK noms, User:SD0001/DYK-helper that makes the process easier. Except for the QPQ requirement in which I'm afraid I can't be of much help, the rest of the steps are now quite simplified. Any suggestions or feedback on the script is welcome and encouraged. SD0001 ( talk) 06:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
SoundGirls looks like the sort of article that's of interest here. Is there anything for tagging the talk: page on articles like that to indicate such relevance?
(Also, any editor effort is of course welcome) Andy Dingley ( talk) 14:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I've just created a stub on Xifeng Wu, a cancer epidemiologist who has been driven out of the United States by the FBI, if anybody wants to pitch in. Abductive ( reasoning) 00:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Saw this video by the University of Washington where it shows previous Women in Red monthly editathons plus interviews @ Rosiestep: -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 22:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
A new exhibit at the Minneapolis Institute of Art. Looks interesting - and it's coming to the Renwick Gallery next year, so I'll have a chance to see it. A cursory glance at a number of articles indicates there are a number of artists featured who lack articles. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a complete list of artists - if anyone knows how to develop one, I think it'd be quite useful. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 15:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi WiR, I've made improvements to the article on Roxanne Swentzell a Native American Santa Clara Pueblo sculptor. If someone could take a look at it, assess it, and consider changing the rating on the talk page Talk:Roxanne Swentzell from a start page to a C or even, if it looks like it, a B if it qualifies. Your feedback would be appreciated if you can find issues with the page that can still be improved. Thanks in advance! Netherzone ( talk) 13:34, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
FYI - https://projects.history.qmul.ac.uk/thehistorian/2019/06/20/hidden-figures/ -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 07:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.
There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:
Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:
Until next time,
-— Isarra ༆ 21:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Harini Iyengar AfD comments welcome. -- The Vintage Feminist ( talk) 23:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Patricia Mayorga was awarded the CPJ International Press Freedom Awards in 2017 needs translation from Spanish and can be expanded. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 06:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)