This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Need another template – based on Template:Super Over – that refers to Batter not Batsman, for Women's T-20 competitions. 12:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
URRR ! That is not what I was asking for. I did not have a a problem with the word Batsman for the template as it applies to male cricketers. I am asking for an additional template, not to make the existing one unisex. Matilda Maniac ( talk) 21:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Anyone interested, please see the WP:RM on this article. Spike 'em ( talk) 16:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi all, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladeshi cricket team records and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 ICC World Twenty20 statistics. Thanks. – Ianblair23 (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
As per MOS:SPORTFLAGS, if flags are to be used in tables etc to show a player's nationality, they are to show the national team represented. Hence people should use {{ cricon}} instead of {{ flagicon}} in lists of players (as these link to the teams instead of the countries). I've just done some tidying up in relation to the ICC Awards announced today and replaced a few hundred. Spike 'em ( talk) 17:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi all,
When this article was in mainspace - see
the article history - it was nominated for speedy deletion under the
WP:A7 criterion. I decided to
WP:DRAFTIFY instead. I must admit that the WP:A7 tag - "as an article about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not
credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject" seemed quite right.
Your thoughts about this? Not Warwick Todd aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 12:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
One article I did find was this one from Qatar. I'd lean towards having it as an article, but a couple of prose based references to indicate notability would be very helpful. Spike 'em ( talk) 12:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I've asked for help over at Wikipedia talk:Drafts#Hamza Tariq World Cup 2018 draft with regard to Draft:Hamza Tariq World Cup 2018 for two reasons: it's a draft, hence within their purview, and I don't know whether or not it's about anything real, which is where your expertise comes in. Is there a World Cup named after this player?
If it's simply neglected for six months it will be deleted per WP:CSD#G13 as an abandoned draft, but perhaps it can be sorted out more quickly if somebody here has time to demystify it over there. – Athaenara ✉ 04:00, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Just recalling that this article (well, Mohammad Arif (cricketer)) was deleted not so long ago. I'm not sure I could do it because my brain would get all the names scrambled, but there are five Mohammad Arifs who meet CRIN.
The reason I mention all five is that we've had people in the past who, when we've added new cricketers one by one who share their names with previously deleted cricketers, have prematurely deleted them without being aware of the subject matter or checking that the previously deleted article(s) do(es) not refer to the same player(s). Cheers in advance. Bobo . 07:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Should T20I tournaments played between Associates be added here or not? They all now have international status with records and stats being added to official stats on cricinfo. Discussion please!! Case in point: 2017–18 United Arab Emirates Tri-Nation Series was added to that particular season's page despite being played between Associate countries. There has been a suggestion by another user but can that be taken for all Associate related T20I cricket matches / series. Reason I am putting this up for discussion is because after 2019–21 ICC Cricket World Cup Challenge League starts many more things can come up. -- Ankurc.17 ( talk) 06:08, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Can someone please explain to me in regular human words what has recently happened in terms of international players' notability? Is it the "Other associate members" which have become "eligible" for individual player articles? Keeping track of each national team is going to prove a tricky job, probably - especially on this massively increased scale! Thank you as always.
Please forgive me for repeating myself from above. Just to keep my brain in order! Bobo . 02:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
So I admit, it wasn't the wisest to start MULTIAFD, and I apologize. My reasoning for deletion can be found on this AFD page. It seems that all of them will be kept, so I believe I can start the conversation here. Others suggested this is a good place to start the debate. Please add your comments. I will RFC if appropriate and necessary in the future. ImmortalWizard (chat) 14:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
You are entitled to explain either to keep all, delete all, delete some of them and keep others, merge all, merge some of them and any other variations" = Unambiguous AfD v2
New voice here. How about this? Could you please point to one of these that you think problematic and explain why it's a problem? Thanks. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 09:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
ImmortalWizard appears to have been indef blocked. Does this automatically make an AfD discussion instigated by said user null and void, if not a speedy-close (so to speak)? I wonder why IW decided to do this having been a registered member for 4.5 years... Bobo . 02:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
This guy is 100 today - however, can anyone find any source to show he's alive? 100 is a rare age to reach, let alone in India. StickyWicket ( talk) 13:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Can someone with access to CA get the stats for Sabapathypillai Illangaratnam? I'm guessing he's noteworthy enough ... Roisterer ( talk) 02:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I can't access cricket archive (except so briefly that I think he's played one List A match. Can someone get me the details of the match? Cheers -- Roisterer ( talk) 06:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see the discussion here. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. The IPL franchise from Hyderabad was mostly known to everyone as Sunrisers Hyderabad though their official name was actually stylized as SunRisers Hyderabad (which is referred as same in their official website or their official twitter/facebook handles). So, does this mean that the article names must be present as SunRisers/Sunrisers? I created 2018 & 2019 season pages in which I mentioned in the article title as Sunrisers but mentioned in the article as SunRisers. Can anyone suggest on if I need to change the title name or change in the body instead. Thanks. Sa Ga Vaj 19:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:World Cup cricketers by country I think this category is not needed. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 03:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
As per WP:CRIC, Women's Regional Qualifier are not allowed. But we have a precedence of 2017 Women's Cricket World Cup qualification. As per today's ICC release, the regional qualifier this time would be the common for both 2020 ICC Women's World Twenty20 Qualifier and 2021 Women's Cricket World Cup Qualifier. Will the page be allowed and if yes, what should be it named as it is for 2 World Qualifier tournaments. Shubham389 ( talk) 13:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi all, Victoria Ground (Leeds) at AfD here, been relisted twice now. StickyWicket ( talk) 12:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Can someone fix County Cricket Ground, Hove? The firstwodiaway parameter needs to be International XI, but this is causing an issue, which I don't know how to fix. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
{{{firstmatchtypeaway}}}
parameters. These in turn use {{
Country data}} templates to get the flag information, and there isn't one created for
International XI women's cricket team.{{subst:crtl|ENG}}
save in article markup as [[England cricket team|England]]
and display like
England.
Spike 'em (
talk) 15:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see the following discussions:
Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Bunch of unnecessary content fed in with quotes. Lists down some of the incidents and it's more like bashing other teams and their captains. Lacks NPOV and not worthy for stand alone page. I recommend redirecting it to Glossary of cricket terms. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 21:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Does anyone know how to update this map, as sadly I haven't a clue! It was created by a user who did good work, but regretably ended up getting banned for sockpuppetry, so I can't ask them! The colours just need updating: Ireland needs turing red and the rest of Europe, minus England and the non-members made orange or blue. StickyWicket ( talk) 23:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@ AssociateAffiliate: - done the European one. I've uploaded a sample to here initially as there are a couple of slightly odd things that could use dealing with:
Now, the geographical oddities (humour me, I'm a geographer...):
Take a look at the sample and if it's OK then I'll upload it. The map is also used on Hindi wikipedia so we'll need someone to change the key on there as well. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
I'll get around to uploading this tomorrow (probably) unless anyone else has comments. Map is at this place for consultation. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've started the following discussions at AfD:
Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
I've added the above player to my watchlist, as it seems Alviro Petersen has paid the article a visit in early Jan to copy and paste a more 'desirable' bio from his personal website. I've reverted, but suspect he'll be back! Just wondering if there could be some additional eyes on? StickyWicket ( talk) 19:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude ( talk) 05:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Have they removed their paywall, as the ESCape trick seems to no longer be necessary? If so, do all the links showing it as paid content need to be changed individually? Spike 'em ( talk) 10:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. Are women's international teams included in the list of newly-"notable" teams? I note that, for example, Namibia women played their first WTT (as per Cricket Archive terminology) matches in August 2018. Let alone the fact that there are a bucketful of women's first-class matches with incomplete scorecards!
Please forgive me for not keeping up to speed. Bobo . 22:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
While getting on with my military cricketers project I created an article for the Combined Services cricketer Duncan Smith CA page (one FC appearance in 1947). Strangely nothing is known about him, beyond his name and that he served in the RAF. His appearance in scorecards as "Duncan Smith" made me wonder if he could be W. G. G. Duncan Smith, who served in the RAF at exactly the same time, though I'm not finding much to back up my theory. Wondering if anyone might be able to dig something up that I've missed as to whether these two are one and the same. PS: I've not checked the Gazette as Duncan Smith would be a needle in a haystack!. Thanks. StickyWicket ( talk) 22:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Can someone confirm that this picture File:Rohan Kanhai 1962.JPG is of Rohan Kanhai - there is an OTRS ticket asserting that this isn't Kanhai but Basil D'Olivera. Nthep ( talk)
Does anyone have any views on whether cricadium.com is a reliable source? Looks like possibly WP:UGC and lacking in editorial control. It has popped up as a source of some dubious records on Virat Kohli and other places. Spike 'em ( talk) 10:28, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I was just wondering whether The Hundred (cricket) and 100-ball cricket should be merged into one article? I appreciate one is the competition and one is the format, but no-one seems to be proposing to play 100-ball bar the ECB in this competition and the articles cover a lot of the same ground. So was wondering, for now at least, whether they should contained in one page? Cheers, HornetMike ( talk) 13:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I would suggest any grounds with less than 20 fifers will have their page redirected to respective ground/list by country ground article. For centuries, the minimum notable I would propose 40. Feel free to compromise. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 20:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Let's not get carried out like this. We need to focus one at a time. I would urge you guys to concentrate on setting up the minimum notability requirement for these lists. After that we can decide on what should be removed or added. One step at a time. Thanks. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 15:40, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Stats are stats and a specific boundary should not be halted by the quality of the grounds. However, I think if a compromise should be made between 10 and 25, 15 or 20 will work just fine in my opinion (minimum 75 or 100 wickets in total). If a ground has a lot of future potentials, they might just be too soon to create. If the list exceeds the boundaries later on, it wouldn't be hard job to copy-paste the table from the page it has been redirected, and a lead with proper prose could be userfied and kept ready for whenever it gets its own page. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 15:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
I think that if the stadium is well established, but yet to have enough five wicket hauls or centuries, it could just stay redirected for the time being. A list say of Lord's, is both large enough and contextually notable to have its own stand alone. The stat provided by Spike 'em is helpful for us to determine the middle ground. Both PeeJay2K3 and Blue Square Thing have brought up good points. I think the idea of contextual notability is extremely important beside the lists' length, since most of the them can easily be found on ESPNCricinfo statsguru. I would personally lean more towards the length aspect, since the contextual significance of most grounds are hardly established (except extremely notable lists such as those of Lord's, Oval, Eden Gardens, MSG, etc, mostly historically significant English and Australian ones).
Also, individual centuries/fifers lists shouldn't be treated the same as the ground ones, as they have variable significant. Example, Tendulkar scoring 100 centuries is far significant than any ground of that length. Hence, I would like any of fifer/century lists below 40 be merged with their respective ground/country ground list, based on Spike 'em's stats. Thanks. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 12:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Update - The issue isn't fully resolved. However, I believe a weak consensus is reached where participants have agreed for no less than 10. Therefore, I will soon start redirecting/merging articles those are below this level. If any objections, please let me know. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 12:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
As part of some work to tidy-up {tl|Infobox cricketer}} I discovered that the 100 or so cricketers who have the |deliveries=overs
parameter set do have the number of overs bowled against the |deliveries1=
etc and hence show the wrong data in the infobox. There is a list of them
Here so if anyone fancies helping then please check the player against the sources and update the deliveries1..4 columns to show the balls bowled, not the total number of overs. Whilst you are there, please remove the |deliveries=overs
section, as the parametere is no longer used (and hasn't been since 2009).
Spike 'em (
talk) 17:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've nominated this for deletion. Please see the discussion here. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The above article is at AfD here. Thoughts please! StickyWicket ( talk) 20:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. I'm trying to find out the exact date of death for Peter Lovell Johnson ( CA bio) who CA claims died in 2017. It strikes me as odd that in 2017 his date of death wouldn't be recorded more accurately. I've searched high and low for his date of death and no luck. Nothing in any paper searches, no deceased estate notices on the Gazette. I traced him to Clare College at Cambridge, but they don't have an obituary for him. I'm beginning to wonder if CA has plucked his out of thin air! Any chance someone could put an extra pair of eyes on this and see if you have better luck than I did! Thanks :) StickyWicket ( talk) 22:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Super Over has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SocietyBox ( talk) 03:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
With the 2019 season just around the corner (why start so early? *shrugs shoulders*) it'd be good to knock a few of the grounds missing picture as the season progresses. If you're near a missing ground, or might be passing by, and can take a picture of it, if you could put your username next to it that would be great!
StickyWicket ( talk) 23:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Looks like Cricketeurope has changed domain to www.cricketeurope.net from www.cricketeurope4.net, or at least closed their www.cricketeurope4.net domain, and the old domain is taken over by some advertising (the page I got was clearly fraudulent). Cricketeurope's scorecards are use as references for some pages like 2015 ICC Europe Division One, but just removing the "4" in the link give a 404 page. -- Moedk ( talk) 09:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
A GA request template has been placed on Mustafizur Rahman. It needs some work in order to maintain its Good status. AIRcorn (talk) 04:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see CfD here. Thanks. StickyWicket ( talk) 13:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Fancy a challenge? As I've been going through and cleaning the remaining infobox parameter issues, lots of very old articles (2006ish) have surfaced that really aren't anywhere close to up to scratch. In particular, East African cricketers from the 1975 world cup and a number of Emirati ones - not from specific competitions, although the 1996 world cup might be a good starting point.
They could really use some care and attention, but there's no way I'll have the time to do anything on them. These lists are a tarting point perhaps:
and, quite possibly, many of the articles at:
So, if you fancy a proper challenge I reckon the 1975 template is the place to start... Blue Square Thing ( talk) 09:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Is the current match first-class?
How/where could I tell this from Cricinfo's coverage, other than it's over 4 days? -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 10:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
First-class debut : JL Smith.The preview on Lord's website says it is too. [1] Spike 'em ( talk) 11:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks both. If there hadn't been a debutant, there's no way of telling from Cricinfo? That's poor. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 11:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Just bringing this category here for discussion. It was created in 2008, but I'm wondering if we really need it? We dont have Category:Overseas cricketers, so do we really need this one? StickyWicket ( talk) 21:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see RM on England cricket team. Spike 'em ( talk) 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
regarding this Pratik Sinha (cricketer). Wanted to AfD but thought of discussing here first.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 06:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
A random ramble. Just that I'd never read this fully before.
I can only think of one situation in which this has ever arisen before and it caused some significant frustration for me to try and bring the deleting admin around to it. Perhaps I'm stating something stupidly obvious. Let's say for example I were to write an article on Gaurav Chauhan (completely chose a name at random from a match in an U14s Indian competition, such that this cricketer is not likely to pass CRIN anytime soon), and the article were sent to AfD (rather than being speedy deleted). Were this cricketer to later make a first-class appearance, then what I find interesting is the clause in CSD G4 (deleted as a result of a previous discussion) which states that a subject of a Wikipedia article is not subject to CSD G4 if the subject now passes a subject-specific notability guideline.
I can imagine someone tagging an article with a speedy deletion template CSD G4, without being aware of a cricketer's new notability. Similarly, this could happen with a (theoretical) cricketer who was deleted last week, who became notable in the interim having made his debut first-class appearance within the last week.
And once again, please don't get me started on the direct contradiction on WP:GNG and WP:N in the claims as to whether an article has to pass SNG (hardline criteria, easy to evaluate) and GNG (woolly and meaningless - but, more to the point, should only be applied to something which does not directly conform to an SNG). Bobo . 01:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Cricketers who have made their debut in the Sri Lankan Premier League tournament this season:
It's worth waiting for verification to see if RADW Mayantha ( 1606103) and W. Mayantha ( 2274810) are the same person. Bobo . 15:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
This IPL fanboy editor User:A Simple Human keeps adding flags to IPL season articles' infoboxes, despite me pointing out to them MOS:INFOBOXFLAG several times. The players' nationality has no relevance to the team they are playing for in these domestic competitions. Can someone please tell them they are wrong as they removed my message from their talk page saying "until you create an account your opinion doesn't matter". Whether or not I want to create an account is my wish. I've been editing here longer than them without registering. Wikipedia:IPs are human too. 2402:3A80:D22:E3B6:EDA4:F0B9:67D3:2894 ( talk) 17:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Can anyone explain to me why IPL season articles are constantly vandalized by IPs and nothing really happens? IPL 2010 to 2017. -- Anaxagoras13 ( talk) 08:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
This article has been split, so any links are better going to Batting average (cricket), piped as appropriate. The cricketer infobox already does this, but there is a botreq in progress to change links in main part of articles. Spike 'em ( talk) 17:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
Can someone please explain to me what the purpose of {{ Cr-IPL}} is? The template doesn't seem to offer anything that couldn't be accomplished with normal wikilinks. – Pee Jay 09:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
Cr-IPL|delhi}}
link has been re-coded to point to Delhi Capitals, so previous seasons (e.g.
2018 IPL) showed the wrong team name in the results section, so I've created an new name for the Capitals (unless someone can be bothered changing 12 years worth of previous results).
Spike 'em (
talk) 10:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
Cr-IPL|kolk-r}}
(17 characters) is preferable to what it transposes to: Kolkota(7). You've persuaded me : this is far too messy a solution to a non-existent problem. Spike 'em ( talk) 13:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Should Irish cricketers be given "overseas" status in England? Although they aren't playing their cricket in Ireland, the likes of Stuart Poynter, Tim Murtagh and Paul Stirling aren't attached to Irish clubs back home. Joalhe1997 ( talk) 14:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Can anyone help with any information at all about this guy? I'm trying to de-orphan the article and I've been desperately searching for even an atom of biographical information about him but I've found diddly-squat. I don't have Cricket Archive so I can't look there, and everywhere else has nothing useful. Birthplace would be super so I could stick him in a "List of people from X" type article, but really anything that would justify me linking him from somewhere. I just want him out of the Feb 09 orphans category, he's the last "C" article as of right now. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline. They are intended only to stop an article from being quickly deleted when there is very strong reason to believe that significant, independent, non-routine, non-promotional secondary coverage from reliable sources are available, given sufficient time to locate them. Wikipedia's standard for including an article about a given person is not based on whether or not he/she has attained certain achievements, but on whether or not the person has received appropriate coverage in reliable sources, in accordance with the general notability guideline.Spike 'em ( talk) 11:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I wonder if any of you might be able to clear my confusion up here! I've heard that the 50-over List A competition will not be run from 2020. Is this the brainchild of the buffon Graves? StickyWicket ( talk) 19:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Please may I reinstate the article at Draft:Faghme Abrahams? This was one of the many articles written by 02blythed - which appears to have been deleted with no explanation - other than "let's draftspace everything by 02blythed without actually looking at it first". This article clearly passes CRIN and is sufficiently-sourced. I'm noticing more and more of these as time is going on which do not fall under CSD G4. To have 60 first-class appearances and to be in draftspace seems strange. Meanwhile, looking at the number of articles which meet CRIN which he has added which have been deleted apparently for "poor quality" (not a deletion criterion) - Haider Ali (Omani cricketer) is just one of many examples - it is sad that this has taken place. Anyone who can, please view 02blythed's deleted contributions to see what I mean. Bobo . 09:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. I wonder if anyone with any old newspaper access might be able to see if the above guy had an obituary published around March/April/May 1939 folling his death on 17 March 1939. I wonder if an obituary might also point toward which college he also attended at Cambridge. Cheers. StickyWicket ( talk) 16:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
On 2019 Cricket World Cup squads, some of the Pakistan players are listed with their Pakistan Super League (i.e. T20) teams. Shouldn't they be listed with their List A teams instead, as the World Cup is a List A tournament? Joseph 2302 ( talk) 08:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm discuss about 7 Articles of IPL for Statistics Section Part.
This Year I added 4 Extra Tables in Statistics section for all Above articles.The Name of Tables as below:
Are Above Tables are required for articles or Not??.( Mr.Mani Raj Paul ( talk) 01:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC))
"The name of a flag's political entity should appear adjacent to the first use of the flag, as no reader is familiar with every flag, and many flags differ only in minor details.". Further, according to MOS:FLAGCRUFT;
"Do not emphasize nationality without good reason".Applying these criteria to the Sunrisers Hyderabad in 2019 article suggests that the use of the flags (with the country name) is entirely appropriate in the squad table: a strong argument can be made that the nationality is a relevant piece of information there. Beyond that? I don't see the nationality being a relevant factor anywhere else. Remember that GA reviews are done by one person; just because another thing has passed GA with problems doesn't make it right. Harrias talk 11:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Pakistan Super League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Pakistan Super League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 06:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've nominated his article to appear on the front page, in the recent deaths section. IMO, the article looks in pretty good shape, but if anyone can make any further improvements, that would be great. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Any idea why we need 50+ template for this section? Why not use full scorecard there like other cricket tournament? Thanks. -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 17:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Women's T20 Challenge redirects to 2018 Women's T20 Challenge, but is it worth creating a general article about both the 2018 and 2019 events? Like how we have one for Indian Premier League as well as the seasons of it. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 06:58, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm working on some maps and could use some information.
I know the second question probably doesn't matter that much, but it's a geography question so I find it interesting. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't have much knowledge in free/non-free images, so I'd be grateful if someone could check the infobox image for Mashrafe Mortaza. It looks too good to be a free image, but the file info on commons suggests it is. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
There is a deletion discussion related to this project; {{ Super Over}} has been nominated for deletion. Please voice your opinions on this template at the related TFD. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 23:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Someone has added an AfD template to this article - in spite of the fact that it obviously meets CRIN. Can someone please help me adding inline citations - I believe that's the way these things are done these days. I'm amazed this article has lasted for so long without any extra content added! Bobo . 19:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
And now CA is being questioned as a secondary source. Again. Can someone with more knowledge than me please explain to this user how CA and CI are valid secondary sources? Bobo . 21:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
An IP has extensively edited this article, and made no other edits. The immediate problem is that several template errors are visible ("Error: Need valid birth date: year, month, day"). I could easily fix them by removing the template for cases where no birth date is provided. However, what about the IP's other edits? BTW I know DoB is of interest in sports but does standard procedure involve posting such information based on an editor's say-so for people with no article? What should be done? Johnuniq ( talk) 03:52, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
In an attempt to bring cricket tournaments into line with other sports, I've started on a {{ #invoke:Sports table|function}} style for cricket tables. My first effort is for ODI tournaments and is currently at {{ #invoke:Sandbox/Spikeem/CricketTable/ODI|function}}, with an example of its implementation at User:Spike 'em/sandbox/CrickTable, which is trying to match the format used in {{ 2019 Cricket World Cup points table}}. Does anyone have any suggestions for improvements, or other table styles to create? I was thinking of doing one for T20 tournaments, which may use Super Overs (do these get recorded separately?) and for County Championship (with the various bonus points / penalties). The template would still exist but the table within it would be replaced by the module call / data. Spike 'em ( talk) 11:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
what's with the ugly VTE in the header row?
will it allow teams to be bolded on their own pages?
|showteam=
. On my test above, I've used |showteam=NZ
to highlight New Zealand in the first table (which I've hived off onto it's own page to mimic how a template containing the table could work). I've also added an example using 4 rows from one of the tables on the page you mentioned as a further example, with Kent highlighted. I've not added a deductions column to the module, I can do so, but do you know what these are for (over rates?)
Spike 'em (
talk) 08:15, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Do the infoboxes update automatically or is it done manually? I asked this before at Portal talk:Cricket but here may be a better place for getting an answer, I guess. -- Bodhi-Baum ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please help and improve this article. 87.140.111.165 ( talk) 11:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
I am concerned that the article Adam Gilchrist does not meet featured article status anymore, and would appreciate discussion and article repairs. Please see here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:06, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Combined Services, British Army, Royal Air Force and the Free Foresters now have articles for all first-class players - please feel free to browse their categories and make any additions! StickyWicket ( talk) 14:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
See this move discussion. Thanks ~SS49~ {talk} 13:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Could someone take a look at India–Pakistan cricket rivalry and give an opinion with regards to the number of statistics in the article? I think I'd probably delete everything from the Championship titles section down - making sure that anything particularly notable were kept in prose - with the exception of the very last section about players who played for both teams. The sheer number of tables after that becomes overwhelming and it's difficult to see what might be kept and what is clearly statscruft.
I may be on the wrong track on this, but it does strike me as a touch of overkill. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 17:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
A seperate section Titled as "Results" wherein as chart is inscribed showing the results of match fixtures so that we can have the better understanding and also easy for future references when we look back. Information on this can be easily retrieved from the reliable sources like Espncricinfo.com or cricbuzz.com . This will really help to have the better and quick understanding of how tournament has proceeded. This can be as follows. I will update this daily.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Naimesdee ( talk • contribs)
Match No. | Match Fixture | Date | Result | Points | Points Awarded to |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | England vs South Africa | May 30, Thu | England won by 104 runs | 2 | England |
2 | West Indies vs Pakistan | May 31, Fri | West Indies won by 7 wkts | 2 | West Indies |
3 | New Zealand vs Sri Lanka | Jun 01, Sat | New Zealand won by 10 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
4 | Afghanistan vs Australia | Jun 01, Sat | Australia won by 7 wkts | 2 | Australia |
5 | South Africa vs Bangladesh | Jun 02, Sun | Bangladesh won by 21 runs | 2 | Bangladesh |
6 | England vs Pakistan | Jun 03, Mon | Pakistan won by 14 runs | 2 | Pakistan |
7 | Afghanistan vs Sri Lanka | Jun 04, Tue | Sri Lanka won by 34 runs - 41 overs match due to rain, DLS Target 187 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
8 | South Africa vs India | Jun 05, Wed | India won by 6 wkts | 2 | India |
9 | Bangladesh vs New Zealand | Jun 05, Wed | New Zealand won by 2 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
10 | Australia vs West Indies | Jun 06, Thu | Australia won by 15 runs | 2 | Australia |
11 | Pakistan vs Sri Lanka | Jun 07, Fri | Match abandoned without a ball bowled (no toss) | 1&1 | Pakistan & Sri Lanka each 1 Point |
12 | England vs Bangladesh | Jun 08, Sat | England won by 106 runs | 2 | England |
13 | Afghanistan vs New Zealand | Jun 08, Sat | New Zealand won by 7 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
14 | India vs Australia | Jun 09, Sun | India won by 36 runs | 2 | India |
15 | South Africa vs West Indies | Jun 10, Mon | No result | 1&1 | South Africa & West Indies each 1 point |
16 | Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka | Jun 11, Tue | Match abandoned without toss due to rain | 1&1 | Bangladesh & Sri Lanka each 1 Point |
17 | Australia vs Pakistan | Jun 12, Wed | Australia won by 41 runs | 2 | Australia |
18 | India vs New Zealand | Jun 13, Thu | Match abandoned without toss (due to rain) | 1&1 | India & New Zealand each 1 Point |
19 | England vs West Indies | Jun 14, Fri | England won by 8 wkts | 2 | England |
20 | Sri Lanka vs Australia | Jun 15, Sat | Australia won by 87 runs | 2 | Australia |
21 | South Africa vs Afghanistan | Jun 15, Sat | South Africa won by 9 wkts (DLS method) | 2 | South Africa |
22 | India vs Pakistan | Jun 16, Sun | India won by 89 runs (DLS method) | 2 | India |
23 | West Indies vs Bangladesh | Jun 17, Mon | Bangladesh won by 7 wkts | 2 | Bangladesh |
24 | England vs Afghanistan | Jun 18, Tue | England won by 150 runs | 2 | England |
25 | New Zealand vs South Africa | Jun 19, Wed | New Zealand won by 4 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
26 | Australia vs Bangladesh | Jun 20, Thu | Australia won by 48 runs | 2 | Australia |
27 | England vs Sri Lanka | Jun 21, Fri | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
28 | India vs Afghanistan | Jun 22, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
29 | West Indies vs New Zealand | Jun 22, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
30 | Pakistan vs South Africa | Jun 23, Sun | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
31 | Bangladesh vs Afghanistan | Jun 24, Mon | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
32 | England vs Australia | Jun 25, Tue | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
33 | New Zealand vs Pakistan | Jun 26, Wed | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
34 | West Indies vs India | Jun 27, Thu | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
35 | Sri Lanka vs South Africa | Jun 28, Fri | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
36 | Pakistan vs Afghanistan | Jun 29, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
37 | New Zealand vs Australia | Jun 29, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
38 | England vs India | Jun 30, Sun | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
39 | Sri Lanka vs West Indies | Jul 01, Mon | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
40 | Bangladesh vs India | Jul 02, Tue | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
41 | England vs New Zealand | Jul 03, Wed | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
42 | Afghanistan vs West Indies | Jul 04, Thu | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
43 | Pakistan vs Bangladesh | Jul 05, Fri | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
44 | Sri Lanka vs India | Jul 06, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
45 | Australia vs South Africa | Jul 06, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
46 | TBC vs TBC 1st Semi-Final (1 v 4) | Jul 09, Tue | Yet to be played | Knock out | Knock out |
47 | TBC vs TBC 2nd Semi-Final (2 v 3) | Jul 11, Thu | Yet to be played | Knock out | Knock out |
48 | TBC vs TBC Final | Jul 14, Sun | Yet to be played | Knock out | Knock out |
From this section in What Wikipedia is not : Not every match played or goal scored is significant enough to be included in the biography of a person.
Lots of editors go around adding every single match or innings that an international player takes part in, even if their role in it is minor. Please bear this in mind, so that we have fewer sections that are just lists of On day month year he scored nn runs / took mm wickets against opponent and his team won / lost by x runs / wickets.
Spike 'em (
talk) 12:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Could someone do me a favour and look at the claim in the lead paragraph of AB de Villiers that "He is widely regarded as one the greatest batsman ever to have played the game". Thanks. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be at it again from a new IP; have reported it at WP:DRAMABOARD (though this should be relatively drama free)... 107.190.33.254 ( talk) 20:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Under WP:CRIC#STYLE, there seems to be no specific guidelines regarding the Records and achievements section of BLPs. As a long time solution, prose over list would be much appropriate for most cases and the abolishment of WP:TRIVIA is necessary. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 08:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Following today's Cricinfo article, there's a note to say that Parbhu Nana, the oldest living World Cup cricketer died some years ago. If anyone has any further sources, that would be great. I've made a note in the article. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 20:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Women in Red is devoting the next two months (July and August) to a virtual editathon on Women in Sports. Please take this opportunity to write more articles about women cricketers who lag far behind men on Wikipedia.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Does anyone know why Notts and Hants have both been deducted a point? I'm sure there's an ECB press release somewhere, but I can't find them. I'm assuming over-rates? Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. Stumbled across Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes if anyone fancies knocking some of these off, appears to have been pretty much forgotten over the years! Added to my to-do list! StickyWicket ( talk) 10:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've bundled a group of non-notable cricketers for deletion. The discussion can be found here. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. A couple of days ago, Michael Gough was involved in a DRS decision with Rohit Sharma given out. Unbelievably, some Indian fan-boys didn't like this (I know, shocking!), so took their frustration out on his article. Take a look at the edit history - somewhere in the region of ~150 edits/reverts in about one hour after this. Some editors think it's worth including this affront to Indian cricket in the article, but I don't think it is. There is a discussion on the talkpage for further input. Oh, and India went on to beat the West Indies by 125 runs... Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Although not related to this project, I found this quite interesting. One in six BLPs are footballers, with approx 1 in 59 BLPs being cricketers. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
WP lacks an article on this important skill in the one-day game, and bowlers who excel at it. (I think I remember Mike Procter bowling 6 well-directed leg stump yorkers in the final over of some match in the 1970s.)
Closer (baseball) is a similar skill (and needs a similar mental set). Narky Blert ( talk) 22:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Need another template – based on Template:Super Over – that refers to Batter not Batsman, for Women's T-20 competitions. 12:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
URRR ! That is not what I was asking for. I did not have a a problem with the word Batsman for the template as it applies to male cricketers. I am asking for an additional template, not to make the existing one unisex. Matilda Maniac ( talk) 21:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Anyone interested, please see the WP:RM on this article. Spike 'em ( talk) 16:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi all, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladeshi cricket team records and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 ICC World Twenty20 statistics. Thanks. – Ianblair23 (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
As per MOS:SPORTFLAGS, if flags are to be used in tables etc to show a player's nationality, they are to show the national team represented. Hence people should use {{ cricon}} instead of {{ flagicon}} in lists of players (as these link to the teams instead of the countries). I've just done some tidying up in relation to the ICC Awards announced today and replaced a few hundred. Spike 'em ( talk) 17:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi all,
When this article was in mainspace - see
the article history - it was nominated for speedy deletion under the
WP:A7 criterion. I decided to
WP:DRAFTIFY instead. I must admit that the WP:A7 tag - "as an article about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not
credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject" seemed quite right.
Your thoughts about this? Not Warwick Todd aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 12:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
One article I did find was this one from Qatar. I'd lean towards having it as an article, but a couple of prose based references to indicate notability would be very helpful. Spike 'em ( talk) 12:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I've asked for help over at Wikipedia talk:Drafts#Hamza Tariq World Cup 2018 draft with regard to Draft:Hamza Tariq World Cup 2018 for two reasons: it's a draft, hence within their purview, and I don't know whether or not it's about anything real, which is where your expertise comes in. Is there a World Cup named after this player?
If it's simply neglected for six months it will be deleted per WP:CSD#G13 as an abandoned draft, but perhaps it can be sorted out more quickly if somebody here has time to demystify it over there. – Athaenara ✉ 04:00, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Just recalling that this article (well, Mohammad Arif (cricketer)) was deleted not so long ago. I'm not sure I could do it because my brain would get all the names scrambled, but there are five Mohammad Arifs who meet CRIN.
The reason I mention all five is that we've had people in the past who, when we've added new cricketers one by one who share their names with previously deleted cricketers, have prematurely deleted them without being aware of the subject matter or checking that the previously deleted article(s) do(es) not refer to the same player(s). Cheers in advance. Bobo . 07:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Should T20I tournaments played between Associates be added here or not? They all now have international status with records and stats being added to official stats on cricinfo. Discussion please!! Case in point: 2017–18 United Arab Emirates Tri-Nation Series was added to that particular season's page despite being played between Associate countries. There has been a suggestion by another user but can that be taken for all Associate related T20I cricket matches / series. Reason I am putting this up for discussion is because after 2019–21 ICC Cricket World Cup Challenge League starts many more things can come up. -- Ankurc.17 ( talk) 06:08, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Can someone please explain to me in regular human words what has recently happened in terms of international players' notability? Is it the "Other associate members" which have become "eligible" for individual player articles? Keeping track of each national team is going to prove a tricky job, probably - especially on this massively increased scale! Thank you as always.
Please forgive me for repeating myself from above. Just to keep my brain in order! Bobo . 02:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
So I admit, it wasn't the wisest to start MULTIAFD, and I apologize. My reasoning for deletion can be found on this AFD page. It seems that all of them will be kept, so I believe I can start the conversation here. Others suggested this is a good place to start the debate. Please add your comments. I will RFC if appropriate and necessary in the future. ImmortalWizard (chat) 14:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
You are entitled to explain either to keep all, delete all, delete some of them and keep others, merge all, merge some of them and any other variations" = Unambiguous AfD v2
New voice here. How about this? Could you please point to one of these that you think problematic and explain why it's a problem? Thanks. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 09:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
ImmortalWizard appears to have been indef blocked. Does this automatically make an AfD discussion instigated by said user null and void, if not a speedy-close (so to speak)? I wonder why IW decided to do this having been a registered member for 4.5 years... Bobo . 02:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
This guy is 100 today - however, can anyone find any source to show he's alive? 100 is a rare age to reach, let alone in India. StickyWicket ( talk) 13:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Can someone with access to CA get the stats for Sabapathypillai Illangaratnam? I'm guessing he's noteworthy enough ... Roisterer ( talk) 02:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I can't access cricket archive (except so briefly that I think he's played one List A match. Can someone get me the details of the match? Cheers -- Roisterer ( talk) 06:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see the discussion here. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. The IPL franchise from Hyderabad was mostly known to everyone as Sunrisers Hyderabad though their official name was actually stylized as SunRisers Hyderabad (which is referred as same in their official website or their official twitter/facebook handles). So, does this mean that the article names must be present as SunRisers/Sunrisers? I created 2018 & 2019 season pages in which I mentioned in the article title as Sunrisers but mentioned in the article as SunRisers. Can anyone suggest on if I need to change the title name or change in the body instead. Thanks. Sa Ga Vaj 19:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:World Cup cricketers by country I think this category is not needed. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 03:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
As per WP:CRIC, Women's Regional Qualifier are not allowed. But we have a precedence of 2017 Women's Cricket World Cup qualification. As per today's ICC release, the regional qualifier this time would be the common for both 2020 ICC Women's World Twenty20 Qualifier and 2021 Women's Cricket World Cup Qualifier. Will the page be allowed and if yes, what should be it named as it is for 2 World Qualifier tournaments. Shubham389 ( talk) 13:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi all, Victoria Ground (Leeds) at AfD here, been relisted twice now. StickyWicket ( talk) 12:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Can someone fix County Cricket Ground, Hove? The firstwodiaway parameter needs to be International XI, but this is causing an issue, which I don't know how to fix. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
{{{firstmatchtypeaway}}}
parameters. These in turn use {{
Country data}} templates to get the flag information, and there isn't one created for
International XI women's cricket team.{{subst:crtl|ENG}}
save in article markup as [[England cricket team|England]]
and display like
England.
Spike 'em (
talk) 15:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see the following discussions:
Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Bunch of unnecessary content fed in with quotes. Lists down some of the incidents and it's more like bashing other teams and their captains. Lacks NPOV and not worthy for stand alone page. I recommend redirecting it to Glossary of cricket terms. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 21:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Does anyone know how to update this map, as sadly I haven't a clue! It was created by a user who did good work, but regretably ended up getting banned for sockpuppetry, so I can't ask them! The colours just need updating: Ireland needs turing red and the rest of Europe, minus England and the non-members made orange or blue. StickyWicket ( talk) 23:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@ AssociateAffiliate: - done the European one. I've uploaded a sample to here initially as there are a couple of slightly odd things that could use dealing with:
Now, the geographical oddities (humour me, I'm a geographer...):
Take a look at the sample and if it's OK then I'll upload it. The map is also used on Hindi wikipedia so we'll need someone to change the key on there as well. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
I'll get around to uploading this tomorrow (probably) unless anyone else has comments. Map is at this place for consultation. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've started the following discussions at AfD:
Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
I've added the above player to my watchlist, as it seems Alviro Petersen has paid the article a visit in early Jan to copy and paste a more 'desirable' bio from his personal website. I've reverted, but suspect he'll be back! Just wondering if there could be some additional eyes on? StickyWicket ( talk) 19:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude ( talk) 05:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Have they removed their paywall, as the ESCape trick seems to no longer be necessary? If so, do all the links showing it as paid content need to be changed individually? Spike 'em ( talk) 10:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. Are women's international teams included in the list of newly-"notable" teams? I note that, for example, Namibia women played their first WTT (as per Cricket Archive terminology) matches in August 2018. Let alone the fact that there are a bucketful of women's first-class matches with incomplete scorecards!
Please forgive me for not keeping up to speed. Bobo . 22:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
While getting on with my military cricketers project I created an article for the Combined Services cricketer Duncan Smith CA page (one FC appearance in 1947). Strangely nothing is known about him, beyond his name and that he served in the RAF. His appearance in scorecards as "Duncan Smith" made me wonder if he could be W. G. G. Duncan Smith, who served in the RAF at exactly the same time, though I'm not finding much to back up my theory. Wondering if anyone might be able to dig something up that I've missed as to whether these two are one and the same. PS: I've not checked the Gazette as Duncan Smith would be a needle in a haystack!. Thanks. StickyWicket ( talk) 22:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Can someone confirm that this picture File:Rohan Kanhai 1962.JPG is of Rohan Kanhai - there is an OTRS ticket asserting that this isn't Kanhai but Basil D'Olivera. Nthep ( talk)
Does anyone have any views on whether cricadium.com is a reliable source? Looks like possibly WP:UGC and lacking in editorial control. It has popped up as a source of some dubious records on Virat Kohli and other places. Spike 'em ( talk) 10:28, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I was just wondering whether The Hundred (cricket) and 100-ball cricket should be merged into one article? I appreciate one is the competition and one is the format, but no-one seems to be proposing to play 100-ball bar the ECB in this competition and the articles cover a lot of the same ground. So was wondering, for now at least, whether they should contained in one page? Cheers, HornetMike ( talk) 13:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I would suggest any grounds with less than 20 fifers will have their page redirected to respective ground/list by country ground article. For centuries, the minimum notable I would propose 40. Feel free to compromise. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 20:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Let's not get carried out like this. We need to focus one at a time. I would urge you guys to concentrate on setting up the minimum notability requirement for these lists. After that we can decide on what should be removed or added. One step at a time. Thanks. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 15:40, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Stats are stats and a specific boundary should not be halted by the quality of the grounds. However, I think if a compromise should be made between 10 and 25, 15 or 20 will work just fine in my opinion (minimum 75 or 100 wickets in total). If a ground has a lot of future potentials, they might just be too soon to create. If the list exceeds the boundaries later on, it wouldn't be hard job to copy-paste the table from the page it has been redirected, and a lead with proper prose could be userfied and kept ready for whenever it gets its own page. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 15:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
I think that if the stadium is well established, but yet to have enough five wicket hauls or centuries, it could just stay redirected for the time being. A list say of Lord's, is both large enough and contextually notable to have its own stand alone. The stat provided by Spike 'em is helpful for us to determine the middle ground. Both PeeJay2K3 and Blue Square Thing have brought up good points. I think the idea of contextual notability is extremely important beside the lists' length, since most of the them can easily be found on ESPNCricinfo statsguru. I would personally lean more towards the length aspect, since the contextual significance of most grounds are hardly established (except extremely notable lists such as those of Lord's, Oval, Eden Gardens, MSG, etc, mostly historically significant English and Australian ones).
Also, individual centuries/fifers lists shouldn't be treated the same as the ground ones, as they have variable significant. Example, Tendulkar scoring 100 centuries is far significant than any ground of that length. Hence, I would like any of fifer/century lists below 40 be merged with their respective ground/country ground list, based on Spike 'em's stats. Thanks. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 12:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Update - The issue isn't fully resolved. However, I believe a weak consensus is reached where participants have agreed for no less than 10. Therefore, I will soon start redirecting/merging articles those are below this level. If any objections, please let me know. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 12:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
As part of some work to tidy-up {tl|Infobox cricketer}} I discovered that the 100 or so cricketers who have the |deliveries=overs
parameter set do have the number of overs bowled against the |deliveries1=
etc and hence show the wrong data in the infobox. There is a list of them
Here so if anyone fancies helping then please check the player against the sources and update the deliveries1..4 columns to show the balls bowled, not the total number of overs. Whilst you are there, please remove the |deliveries=overs
section, as the parametere is no longer used (and hasn't been since 2009).
Spike 'em (
talk) 17:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've nominated this for deletion. Please see the discussion here. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The above article is at AfD here. Thoughts please! StickyWicket ( talk) 20:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. I'm trying to find out the exact date of death for Peter Lovell Johnson ( CA bio) who CA claims died in 2017. It strikes me as odd that in 2017 his date of death wouldn't be recorded more accurately. I've searched high and low for his date of death and no luck. Nothing in any paper searches, no deceased estate notices on the Gazette. I traced him to Clare College at Cambridge, but they don't have an obituary for him. I'm beginning to wonder if CA has plucked his out of thin air! Any chance someone could put an extra pair of eyes on this and see if you have better luck than I did! Thanks :) StickyWicket ( talk) 22:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Super Over has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SocietyBox ( talk) 03:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
With the 2019 season just around the corner (why start so early? *shrugs shoulders*) it'd be good to knock a few of the grounds missing picture as the season progresses. If you're near a missing ground, or might be passing by, and can take a picture of it, if you could put your username next to it that would be great!
StickyWicket ( talk) 23:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Looks like Cricketeurope has changed domain to www.cricketeurope.net from www.cricketeurope4.net, or at least closed their www.cricketeurope4.net domain, and the old domain is taken over by some advertising (the page I got was clearly fraudulent). Cricketeurope's scorecards are use as references for some pages like 2015 ICC Europe Division One, but just removing the "4" in the link give a 404 page. -- Moedk ( talk) 09:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
A GA request template has been placed on Mustafizur Rahman. It needs some work in order to maintain its Good status. AIRcorn (talk) 04:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see CfD here. Thanks. StickyWicket ( talk) 13:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Fancy a challenge? As I've been going through and cleaning the remaining infobox parameter issues, lots of very old articles (2006ish) have surfaced that really aren't anywhere close to up to scratch. In particular, East African cricketers from the 1975 world cup and a number of Emirati ones - not from specific competitions, although the 1996 world cup might be a good starting point.
They could really use some care and attention, but there's no way I'll have the time to do anything on them. These lists are a tarting point perhaps:
and, quite possibly, many of the articles at:
So, if you fancy a proper challenge I reckon the 1975 template is the place to start... Blue Square Thing ( talk) 09:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Is the current match first-class?
How/where could I tell this from Cricinfo's coverage, other than it's over 4 days? -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 10:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
First-class debut : JL Smith.The preview on Lord's website says it is too. [1] Spike 'em ( talk) 11:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks both. If there hadn't been a debutant, there's no way of telling from Cricinfo? That's poor. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 11:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Just bringing this category here for discussion. It was created in 2008, but I'm wondering if we really need it? We dont have Category:Overseas cricketers, so do we really need this one? StickyWicket ( talk) 21:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see RM on England cricket team. Spike 'em ( talk) 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
regarding this Pratik Sinha (cricketer). Wanted to AfD but thought of discussing here first.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 06:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
A random ramble. Just that I'd never read this fully before.
I can only think of one situation in which this has ever arisen before and it caused some significant frustration for me to try and bring the deleting admin around to it. Perhaps I'm stating something stupidly obvious. Let's say for example I were to write an article on Gaurav Chauhan (completely chose a name at random from a match in an U14s Indian competition, such that this cricketer is not likely to pass CRIN anytime soon), and the article were sent to AfD (rather than being speedy deleted). Were this cricketer to later make a first-class appearance, then what I find interesting is the clause in CSD G4 (deleted as a result of a previous discussion) which states that a subject of a Wikipedia article is not subject to CSD G4 if the subject now passes a subject-specific notability guideline.
I can imagine someone tagging an article with a speedy deletion template CSD G4, without being aware of a cricketer's new notability. Similarly, this could happen with a (theoretical) cricketer who was deleted last week, who became notable in the interim having made his debut first-class appearance within the last week.
And once again, please don't get me started on the direct contradiction on WP:GNG and WP:N in the claims as to whether an article has to pass SNG (hardline criteria, easy to evaluate) and GNG (woolly and meaningless - but, more to the point, should only be applied to something which does not directly conform to an SNG). Bobo . 01:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Cricketers who have made their debut in the Sri Lankan Premier League tournament this season:
It's worth waiting for verification to see if RADW Mayantha ( 1606103) and W. Mayantha ( 2274810) are the same person. Bobo . 15:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
This IPL fanboy editor User:A Simple Human keeps adding flags to IPL season articles' infoboxes, despite me pointing out to them MOS:INFOBOXFLAG several times. The players' nationality has no relevance to the team they are playing for in these domestic competitions. Can someone please tell them they are wrong as they removed my message from their talk page saying "until you create an account your opinion doesn't matter". Whether or not I want to create an account is my wish. I've been editing here longer than them without registering. Wikipedia:IPs are human too. 2402:3A80:D22:E3B6:EDA4:F0B9:67D3:2894 ( talk) 17:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Can anyone explain to me why IPL season articles are constantly vandalized by IPs and nothing really happens? IPL 2010 to 2017. -- Anaxagoras13 ( talk) 08:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
This article has been split, so any links are better going to Batting average (cricket), piped as appropriate. The cricketer infobox already does this, but there is a botreq in progress to change links in main part of articles. Spike 'em ( talk) 17:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
Can someone please explain to me what the purpose of {{ Cr-IPL}} is? The template doesn't seem to offer anything that couldn't be accomplished with normal wikilinks. – Pee Jay 09:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
Cr-IPL|delhi}}
link has been re-coded to point to Delhi Capitals, so previous seasons (e.g.
2018 IPL) showed the wrong team name in the results section, so I've created an new name for the Capitals (unless someone can be bothered changing 12 years worth of previous results).
Spike 'em (
talk) 10:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
Cr-IPL|kolk-r}}
(17 characters) is preferable to what it transposes to: Kolkota(7). You've persuaded me : this is far too messy a solution to a non-existent problem. Spike 'em ( talk) 13:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Should Irish cricketers be given "overseas" status in England? Although they aren't playing their cricket in Ireland, the likes of Stuart Poynter, Tim Murtagh and Paul Stirling aren't attached to Irish clubs back home. Joalhe1997 ( talk) 14:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Can anyone help with any information at all about this guy? I'm trying to de-orphan the article and I've been desperately searching for even an atom of biographical information about him but I've found diddly-squat. I don't have Cricket Archive so I can't look there, and everywhere else has nothing useful. Birthplace would be super so I could stick him in a "List of people from X" type article, but really anything that would justify me linking him from somewhere. I just want him out of the Feb 09 orphans category, he's the last "C" article as of right now. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline. They are intended only to stop an article from being quickly deleted when there is very strong reason to believe that significant, independent, non-routine, non-promotional secondary coverage from reliable sources are available, given sufficient time to locate them. Wikipedia's standard for including an article about a given person is not based on whether or not he/she has attained certain achievements, but on whether or not the person has received appropriate coverage in reliable sources, in accordance with the general notability guideline.Spike 'em ( talk) 11:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I wonder if any of you might be able to clear my confusion up here! I've heard that the 50-over List A competition will not be run from 2020. Is this the brainchild of the buffon Graves? StickyWicket ( talk) 19:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Please may I reinstate the article at Draft:Faghme Abrahams? This was one of the many articles written by 02blythed - which appears to have been deleted with no explanation - other than "let's draftspace everything by 02blythed without actually looking at it first". This article clearly passes CRIN and is sufficiently-sourced. I'm noticing more and more of these as time is going on which do not fall under CSD G4. To have 60 first-class appearances and to be in draftspace seems strange. Meanwhile, looking at the number of articles which meet CRIN which he has added which have been deleted apparently for "poor quality" (not a deletion criterion) - Haider Ali (Omani cricketer) is just one of many examples - it is sad that this has taken place. Anyone who can, please view 02blythed's deleted contributions to see what I mean. Bobo . 09:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. I wonder if anyone with any old newspaper access might be able to see if the above guy had an obituary published around March/April/May 1939 folling his death on 17 March 1939. I wonder if an obituary might also point toward which college he also attended at Cambridge. Cheers. StickyWicket ( talk) 16:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
On 2019 Cricket World Cup squads, some of the Pakistan players are listed with their Pakistan Super League (i.e. T20) teams. Shouldn't they be listed with their List A teams instead, as the World Cup is a List A tournament? Joseph 2302 ( talk) 08:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm discuss about 7 Articles of IPL for Statistics Section Part.
This Year I added 4 Extra Tables in Statistics section for all Above articles.The Name of Tables as below:
Are Above Tables are required for articles or Not??.( Mr.Mani Raj Paul ( talk) 01:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC))
"The name of a flag's political entity should appear adjacent to the first use of the flag, as no reader is familiar with every flag, and many flags differ only in minor details.". Further, according to MOS:FLAGCRUFT;
"Do not emphasize nationality without good reason".Applying these criteria to the Sunrisers Hyderabad in 2019 article suggests that the use of the flags (with the country name) is entirely appropriate in the squad table: a strong argument can be made that the nationality is a relevant piece of information there. Beyond that? I don't see the nationality being a relevant factor anywhere else. Remember that GA reviews are done by one person; just because another thing has passed GA with problems doesn't make it right. Harrias talk 11:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Pakistan Super League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Pakistan Super League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 06:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've nominated his article to appear on the front page, in the recent deaths section. IMO, the article looks in pretty good shape, but if anyone can make any further improvements, that would be great. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Any idea why we need 50+ template for this section? Why not use full scorecard there like other cricket tournament? Thanks. -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 17:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Women's T20 Challenge redirects to 2018 Women's T20 Challenge, but is it worth creating a general article about both the 2018 and 2019 events? Like how we have one for Indian Premier League as well as the seasons of it. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 06:58, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm working on some maps and could use some information.
I know the second question probably doesn't matter that much, but it's a geography question so I find it interesting. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't have much knowledge in free/non-free images, so I'd be grateful if someone could check the infobox image for Mashrafe Mortaza. It looks too good to be a free image, but the file info on commons suggests it is. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
There is a deletion discussion related to this project; {{ Super Over}} has been nominated for deletion. Please voice your opinions on this template at the related TFD. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 23:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Someone has added an AfD template to this article - in spite of the fact that it obviously meets CRIN. Can someone please help me adding inline citations - I believe that's the way these things are done these days. I'm amazed this article has lasted for so long without any extra content added! Bobo . 19:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
And now CA is being questioned as a secondary source. Again. Can someone with more knowledge than me please explain to this user how CA and CI are valid secondary sources? Bobo . 21:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
An IP has extensively edited this article, and made no other edits. The immediate problem is that several template errors are visible ("Error: Need valid birth date: year, month, day"). I could easily fix them by removing the template for cases where no birth date is provided. However, what about the IP's other edits? BTW I know DoB is of interest in sports but does standard procedure involve posting such information based on an editor's say-so for people with no article? What should be done? Johnuniq ( talk) 03:52, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
In an attempt to bring cricket tournaments into line with other sports, I've started on a {{ #invoke:Sports table|function}} style for cricket tables. My first effort is for ODI tournaments and is currently at {{ #invoke:Sandbox/Spikeem/CricketTable/ODI|function}}, with an example of its implementation at User:Spike 'em/sandbox/CrickTable, which is trying to match the format used in {{ 2019 Cricket World Cup points table}}. Does anyone have any suggestions for improvements, or other table styles to create? I was thinking of doing one for T20 tournaments, which may use Super Overs (do these get recorded separately?) and for County Championship (with the various bonus points / penalties). The template would still exist but the table within it would be replaced by the module call / data. Spike 'em ( talk) 11:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
what's with the ugly VTE in the header row?
will it allow teams to be bolded on their own pages?
|showteam=
. On my test above, I've used |showteam=NZ
to highlight New Zealand in the first table (which I've hived off onto it's own page to mimic how a template containing the table could work). I've also added an example using 4 rows from one of the tables on the page you mentioned as a further example, with Kent highlighted. I've not added a deductions column to the module, I can do so, but do you know what these are for (over rates?)
Spike 'em (
talk) 08:15, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Do the infoboxes update automatically or is it done manually? I asked this before at Portal talk:Cricket but here may be a better place for getting an answer, I guess. -- Bodhi-Baum ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please help and improve this article. 87.140.111.165 ( talk) 11:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
I am concerned that the article Adam Gilchrist does not meet featured article status anymore, and would appreciate discussion and article repairs. Please see here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:06, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Combined Services, British Army, Royal Air Force and the Free Foresters now have articles for all first-class players - please feel free to browse their categories and make any additions! StickyWicket ( talk) 14:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
See this move discussion. Thanks ~SS49~ {talk} 13:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Could someone take a look at India–Pakistan cricket rivalry and give an opinion with regards to the number of statistics in the article? I think I'd probably delete everything from the Championship titles section down - making sure that anything particularly notable were kept in prose - with the exception of the very last section about players who played for both teams. The sheer number of tables after that becomes overwhelming and it's difficult to see what might be kept and what is clearly statscruft.
I may be on the wrong track on this, but it does strike me as a touch of overkill. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 17:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
A seperate section Titled as "Results" wherein as chart is inscribed showing the results of match fixtures so that we can have the better understanding and also easy for future references when we look back. Information on this can be easily retrieved from the reliable sources like Espncricinfo.com or cricbuzz.com . This will really help to have the better and quick understanding of how tournament has proceeded. This can be as follows. I will update this daily.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Naimesdee ( talk • contribs)
Match No. | Match Fixture | Date | Result | Points | Points Awarded to |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | England vs South Africa | May 30, Thu | England won by 104 runs | 2 | England |
2 | West Indies vs Pakistan | May 31, Fri | West Indies won by 7 wkts | 2 | West Indies |
3 | New Zealand vs Sri Lanka | Jun 01, Sat | New Zealand won by 10 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
4 | Afghanistan vs Australia | Jun 01, Sat | Australia won by 7 wkts | 2 | Australia |
5 | South Africa vs Bangladesh | Jun 02, Sun | Bangladesh won by 21 runs | 2 | Bangladesh |
6 | England vs Pakistan | Jun 03, Mon | Pakistan won by 14 runs | 2 | Pakistan |
7 | Afghanistan vs Sri Lanka | Jun 04, Tue | Sri Lanka won by 34 runs - 41 overs match due to rain, DLS Target 187 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
8 | South Africa vs India | Jun 05, Wed | India won by 6 wkts | 2 | India |
9 | Bangladesh vs New Zealand | Jun 05, Wed | New Zealand won by 2 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
10 | Australia vs West Indies | Jun 06, Thu | Australia won by 15 runs | 2 | Australia |
11 | Pakistan vs Sri Lanka | Jun 07, Fri | Match abandoned without a ball bowled (no toss) | 1&1 | Pakistan & Sri Lanka each 1 Point |
12 | England vs Bangladesh | Jun 08, Sat | England won by 106 runs | 2 | England |
13 | Afghanistan vs New Zealand | Jun 08, Sat | New Zealand won by 7 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
14 | India vs Australia | Jun 09, Sun | India won by 36 runs | 2 | India |
15 | South Africa vs West Indies | Jun 10, Mon | No result | 1&1 | South Africa & West Indies each 1 point |
16 | Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka | Jun 11, Tue | Match abandoned without toss due to rain | 1&1 | Bangladesh & Sri Lanka each 1 Point |
17 | Australia vs Pakistan | Jun 12, Wed | Australia won by 41 runs | 2 | Australia |
18 | India vs New Zealand | Jun 13, Thu | Match abandoned without toss (due to rain) | 1&1 | India & New Zealand each 1 Point |
19 | England vs West Indies | Jun 14, Fri | England won by 8 wkts | 2 | England |
20 | Sri Lanka vs Australia | Jun 15, Sat | Australia won by 87 runs | 2 | Australia |
21 | South Africa vs Afghanistan | Jun 15, Sat | South Africa won by 9 wkts (DLS method) | 2 | South Africa |
22 | India vs Pakistan | Jun 16, Sun | India won by 89 runs (DLS method) | 2 | India |
23 | West Indies vs Bangladesh | Jun 17, Mon | Bangladesh won by 7 wkts | 2 | Bangladesh |
24 | England vs Afghanistan | Jun 18, Tue | England won by 150 runs | 2 | England |
25 | New Zealand vs South Africa | Jun 19, Wed | New Zealand won by 4 wkts | 2 | New Zealand |
26 | Australia vs Bangladesh | Jun 20, Thu | Australia won by 48 runs | 2 | Australia |
27 | England vs Sri Lanka | Jun 21, Fri | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
28 | India vs Afghanistan | Jun 22, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
29 | West Indies vs New Zealand | Jun 22, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
30 | Pakistan vs South Africa | Jun 23, Sun | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
31 | Bangladesh vs Afghanistan | Jun 24, Mon | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
32 | England vs Australia | Jun 25, Tue | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
33 | New Zealand vs Pakistan | Jun 26, Wed | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
34 | West Indies vs India | Jun 27, Thu | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
35 | Sri Lanka vs South Africa | Jun 28, Fri | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
36 | Pakistan vs Afghanistan | Jun 29, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
37 | New Zealand vs Australia | Jun 29, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
38 | England vs India | Jun 30, Sun | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
39 | Sri Lanka vs West Indies | Jul 01, Mon | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
40 | Bangladesh vs India | Jul 02, Tue | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
41 | England vs New Zealand | Jul 03, Wed | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
42 | Afghanistan vs West Indies | Jul 04, Thu | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
43 | Pakistan vs Bangladesh | Jul 05, Fri | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
44 | Sri Lanka vs India | Jul 06, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
45 | Australia vs South Africa | Jul 06, Sat | Yet to be played | 0 | Yet to be played |
46 | TBC vs TBC 1st Semi-Final (1 v 4) | Jul 09, Tue | Yet to be played | Knock out | Knock out |
47 | TBC vs TBC 2nd Semi-Final (2 v 3) | Jul 11, Thu | Yet to be played | Knock out | Knock out |
48 | TBC vs TBC Final | Jul 14, Sun | Yet to be played | Knock out | Knock out |
From this section in What Wikipedia is not : Not every match played or goal scored is significant enough to be included in the biography of a person.
Lots of editors go around adding every single match or innings that an international player takes part in, even if their role in it is minor. Please bear this in mind, so that we have fewer sections that are just lists of On day month year he scored nn runs / took mm wickets against opponent and his team won / lost by x runs / wickets.
Spike 'em (
talk) 12:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Could someone do me a favour and look at the claim in the lead paragraph of AB de Villiers that "He is widely regarded as one the greatest batsman ever to have played the game". Thanks. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be at it again from a new IP; have reported it at WP:DRAMABOARD (though this should be relatively drama free)... 107.190.33.254 ( talk) 20:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Under WP:CRIC#STYLE, there seems to be no specific guidelines regarding the Records and achievements section of BLPs. As a long time solution, prose over list would be much appropriate for most cases and the abolishment of WP:TRIVIA is necessary. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 08:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Following today's Cricinfo article, there's a note to say that Parbhu Nana, the oldest living World Cup cricketer died some years ago. If anyone has any further sources, that would be great. I've made a note in the article. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 20:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Women in Red is devoting the next two months (July and August) to a virtual editathon on Women in Sports. Please take this opportunity to write more articles about women cricketers who lag far behind men on Wikipedia.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Does anyone know why Notts and Hants have both been deducted a point? I'm sure there's an ECB press release somewhere, but I can't find them. I'm assuming over-rates? Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi all. Stumbled across Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes if anyone fancies knocking some of these off, appears to have been pretty much forgotten over the years! Added to my to-do list! StickyWicket ( talk) 10:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've bundled a group of non-notable cricketers for deletion. The discussion can be found here. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. A couple of days ago, Michael Gough was involved in a DRS decision with Rohit Sharma given out. Unbelievably, some Indian fan-boys didn't like this (I know, shocking!), so took their frustration out on his article. Take a look at the edit history - somewhere in the region of ~150 edits/reverts in about one hour after this. Some editors think it's worth including this affront to Indian cricket in the article, but I don't think it is. There is a discussion on the talkpage for further input. Oh, and India went on to beat the West Indies by 125 runs... Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Although not related to this project, I found this quite interesting. One in six BLPs are footballers, with approx 1 in 59 BLPs being cricketers. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
WP lacks an article on this important skill in the one-day game, and bowlers who excel at it. (I think I remember Mike Procter bowling 6 well-directed leg stump yorkers in the final over of some match in the 1970s.)
Closer (baseball) is a similar skill (and needs a similar mental set). Narky Blert ( talk) 22:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)