WikiProject Globalization
Project talk
To do
Participants
Article lists & tools
Peer review
Assessment
Templates
Resources
Category tree
Welcome to the
WikiProject Globalization assessment page.
Note: To see recent changes, you may need to
You can assess an article by placing or updating the {{
WikiProject Globalization|class=|importance=}} banner on its talk page (not the article page) using the two parameters, class (to assess the quality) and importance (to assess the priority) (if you are in doubt, these can be left blank).
Quality assessments
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{ WikiProject Globalization}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Globalization|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
| FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Globalization articles) |
FA |
|
| A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Globalization articles) |
A |
|
| GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Globalization articles) | 
GA |
|
| B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Globalization articles) | B | |
| C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Globalization articles) | C | |
| Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Globalization articles) | Start | |
| Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Globalization articles) | Stub | |
| FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Globalization articles) |
FL |
|
| List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Globalization articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
| NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Globalization articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Globalization articles) | ??? |
Quality scale
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FA |
The article has attained
featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. under discussion |
Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
|
FL |
The article has attained
featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. |
List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
|
A |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. |
Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
|
GA |
The article meets all of the
good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from
WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A
good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. |
Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
| B | The article meets all of the
B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach
good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. |
Psychology (as of January 2024) |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. |
Wing (as of June 2018) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. |
Ball (as of September 2014) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. |
Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{ WikiProject Globalization}} project banner on its talk page:
- {{WikiProject Globalization| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
| Top |
| High |
| Mid |
| Low |
| ??? |
The following values may be used for importance assessments:
- Top - adds articles to Category:Top-importance Globalization articles
- High - adds articles to Category:High-importance Globalization articles
- Mid - adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Globalization articles
- Low - adds articles to Category:Low-importance Globalization articles
- Unknown - Any article not rated for importance is automatically added to the Category:Unknown-importance Globalization articles.
Importance scale
| Status | Template | Meaning of Status |
|---|---|---|
| Top | {{ Importance=Top}} | This article is of the utmost importance to the project as it provides a common basis for in-depth understanding of globalization. |
| High | {{ Importance=High}} | This article is very important to the project as it covers a particular expertise or provides a basis for specialized knowledge about globalization. |
| Mid | {{ Importance=Mid}} | This article is of standard importance to the project as it provides a basis for general knowledge of globalization topics. |
| Low | {{ Importance=Low}} | This article is of some importance to this project but covers indirect or trivial information related to globalization. |
| None | None | The article is of unknown importance to the project. It remains to be analyzed. |
Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
Requested assessments
To add a nomination: Method 1: Simply add {{
subst:PR}} to the top of the article's talk page and save it. Method 2 = Add peer-review=yes to the {{
WikiProject Globalization}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see
our Peer review page for additional information).
WikiProject Globalization
Project talk
To do
Participants
Article lists & tools
Peer review
Assessment
Templates
Resources
Category tree
Welcome to the
WikiProject Globalization assessment page.
Note: To see recent changes, you may need to
You can assess an article by placing or updating the {{
WikiProject Globalization|class=|importance=}} banner on its talk page (not the article page) using the two parameters, class (to assess the quality) and importance (to assess the priority) (if you are in doubt, these can be left blank).
Quality assessments
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{ WikiProject Globalization}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Globalization|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
| FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Globalization articles) |
FA |
|
| A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Globalization articles) |
A |
|
| GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Globalization articles) |
GA |
|
| B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Globalization articles) | B | |
| C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Globalization articles) | C | |
| Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Globalization articles) | Start | |
| Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Globalization articles) | Stub | |
| FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Globalization articles) |
FL |
|
| List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Globalization articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
| NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Globalization articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Globalization articles) | ??? |
Quality scale
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FA |
The article has attained
featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. under discussion |
Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
|
FL |
The article has attained
featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. |
List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
|
A |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. |
Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
|
GA |
The article meets all of the
good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from
WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A
good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. |
Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
| B | The article meets all of the
B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach
good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. |
Psychology (as of January 2024) |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. |
Wing (as of June 2018) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. |
Ball (as of September 2014) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. |
Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{ WikiProject Globalization}} project banner on its talk page:
- {{WikiProject Globalization| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
| Top |
| High |
| Mid |
| Low |
| ??? |
The following values may be used for importance assessments:
- Top - adds articles to Category:Top-importance Globalization articles
- High - adds articles to Category:High-importance Globalization articles
- Mid - adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Globalization articles
- Low - adds articles to Category:Low-importance Globalization articles
- Unknown - Any article not rated for importance is automatically added to the Category:Unknown-importance Globalization articles.
Importance scale
| Status | Template | Meaning of Status |
|---|---|---|
| Top | {{ Importance=Top}} | This article is of the utmost importance to the project as it provides a common basis for in-depth understanding of globalization. |
| High | {{ Importance=High}} | This article is very important to the project as it covers a particular expertise or provides a basis for specialized knowledge about globalization. |
| Mid | {{ Importance=Mid}} | This article is of standard importance to the project as it provides a basis for general knowledge of globalization topics. |
| Low | {{ Importance=Low}} | This article is of some importance to this project but covers indirect or trivial information related to globalization. |
| None | None | The article is of unknown importance to the project. It remains to be analyzed. |
Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
Requested assessments
Changes to assessments - click on "show" to the right to expand
| ||
|---|---|---|
May 24, 2022Renamed
Removed
May 23, 2022Reassessed
May 18, 2022RenamedAssessed |
To add a nomination: Method 1: Simply add {{
subst:PR}} to the top of the article's talk page and save it. Method 2 = Add peer-review=yes to the {{
WikiProject Globalization}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see
our Peer review page for additional information).