This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Only placing this here to be fair, to the user that tried to speedy it. Word appears in a few of our articles, so if it is wrong, Wikipedia en masse needs a good clean-up. I vote keep, obviously :- ) Antares33712 21:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete and redirect. — Xezbeth 16:14, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete - neologism, probably coined by the user of the IP. I suppose this could be unloaded onto to the Wiktionary. - Splash 00:14, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Original research nonsense, non notable. No google hits, created by someone I know, unfortunately. CryptoDerk 00:16, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This stub was adapted from some text that I wrote, by someone not familiar with the material, so it comes off as crackpot. My original text is based on understandings gained from a year and half of reading Thomas Cleary. This is a condensation of study in this school begun around 25 years ago. The wikipedia stub Taogebra may appear offensive on first reading, but I am hoping that it may be given a chance to be edited into credible form. Keep the disclaimer up. I agree with the policy of having a reputable encyclopedia, and I also see room for the valid translation of important ideas. Taogebra is based on concepts I remained sceptical of for a very long time. But to cast it out is to skip a stage in comprehension; to let an over zealous rationalization of an uninformed translation define how we understand. In my studies I learned to accept the valid part of a statement and not be bothered by the rest. 05:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Actually, it's not totally original research since Thomas Cleary writes in "The Secret of the Golden Flower",1991, about the potential for the techniques of the Complete Reality school of Tao [Ch'an, Zen]to be used for general problem solving. I tried to edit some of the bunk out of that entry; it said the edit needs to be merged, which I haven't figured out yet. -fractile *****
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity bio of a "professional pogger". No Google hits I can find. Calton | Talk 00:14, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Flcelloguy Give me a note! Desk 00:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 10:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Denni ☯ 01:52, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Forever Alexa has no purpose on Wikipedia, is self-promoting, and Alexa Vega (of whom I'd never heard) is simply too minor, IMHO. Hope I did this all in decorum. I'm still new. Recnilgiarc 01:56, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep Ben Standeven 23:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
For discussion. Had been marked as speedy by user:Denni for nonsense. See also Talk:Tiamat (Planet) Satori 02:18, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:19, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Besides the fact that we already have an article about the Executor class, the name is misspelled. Kross 02:21, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:19, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
The author has repeatedly reverted any attempt to (reasonably or otherwise) remove the article, or even clean it up. They just got rid of the {{cleanup}} without a single change. No official policy on monikers I suppose. At best, non-encyclopedic, but I'll leave this one to the rest of you.- Splash 02:48, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:19, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, notability not established.- gadfium 03:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:22, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Same case as Hans Nusslein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayumashu ( talk • contribs) 04:51, 26 May 2005
The result of the debate was no consensus. There are six votes to delete, two of which were cast before the article was significantly modified, but which give no alternate instructions (e.g. they do not say delete unless...); there are three votes to keep, plus Uncle G's fairly lengthy discussion noting the modification, which, in combination with his labor in expansion of the article, projects a desire that the article be kept. Counting that as a vote to keep makes it 6-4, ergo, no consensus for deletion. -- BD2412 talk July 2, 2005 04:49 (UTC)
I think the decision to Transwiki this to Wiktionary was a good one. Bang, by itself, is no more encyclopedia-worthy than any other syllable in the Korean language. Therefore, delete. Visviva 03:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:20, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable college newspaper comic strip. — Gwalla | Talk 03:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was SPEEDIED — Gwalla | Talk 04:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Looks to be an advert for a used car dealership. ~~Shiri — Talk~~ 03:55, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy KEEP (nomination retracted)
—
Gwalla |
Talk 23:17, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable audio software.
—
Gwalla |
Talk 04:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:50 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. — Gwalla | Talk 04:32, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Guerin cast] -- Fishcakefillet 16:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:24, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Vanity, it looks like. Bloghate 04:34, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:52 (UTC)
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Seems to be a notable golf course designer, actually, but this article doesn't tell us much of anything and is POV. Nominator abstains from voting. — Gwalla | Talk 04:37, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Ben Standeven 23:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete If every blogger gets a page, we're in trouble. There should be some other type of accomplishment! Bloghate 04:39, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Seems very vanity like Bloghate 04:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 17:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate; reason given was "no information to establish any notability is provided and gets no hits on google". Article does not establish notability: apparently just some guy who emigrated (possibly genealogical vanity?). Broken title too. — Gwalla | Talk 04:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Reads like an ad Bloghate 04:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Reads like an ad Bloghate 04:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedied. — Xezbeth 17:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This was tagged as VfD by someone else, but they never wrote the VfD entry. I am doing it for them. Delete as blatant advertising. — JIP | Talk 05:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Ben Standeven 23:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete There is no category for pencil users, why should there be one for bloggers? Bloghate 05:06, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 17:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Doomed to be non-notable forever. Denni ☯ 01:25, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 17:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Matt Mutino is the head of the Icelandic Phallological Museum. Even if the museum is notable, I tend to doubt its "head phallologist" is. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 06:10, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ambiguous.
There are several interlinked decisions in this thread. It is made more complicated by a very chaotic pagemove history. After carefully reviewing all the comments and the evidence presented (and ignoring the "vote count" because it's not helpful in this case):
Article fails to establish notability. The User has moved Don Black (nationalist) to [[Don Black (racist}]] and then added this non-notable person and tried to create a disambiguation page. Rick K 06:41, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
He has now moved the article under Vfd to Don Black (non-notable person) and the other article to Don Black (racialist). Rick K 07:07, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
"Don Black (activist)" will require another level of disambiguation, since the "Don Black (non-notable person)" may consider himself an activist, and lead to more activity. The "Don Black (racialist)" is most appropriate, as noted above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.200.240.250 ( talk • contribs) 07:48, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Gentlemen -
While I am affiliated with UCI, I am not a professor.
However, there is another Don Black who is notable. He is the classic "Right Stuff" individual. He is a former Executive Vice President and General Manager of the McDonnell-Douglas Corporation. He was a pilot in indonesia during WW-II (flew the hump). He is still saving lives by donating his time to managing an organization that finds shelter for the homeless in Southern California. He also contributes his time to other charitable works such as ensuring open-space will exist in Southern California for our children.
The original generic "Don Black (non-notable)" should be allowed to stand on its own merits as representative of the other Don Blacks.
- Don V Black, Chairman, IEEE Computer Society of Orange County 6/17/05 11:00AM PDT
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.200.241.74 ( talk • contribs) 18:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedied. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:28, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Advertising -- Ferkelparade π 06:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:28, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Not a single Google hit, sounds made up to me -- Ferkelparade π 06:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus (kept) (3 keeps, 2 deletes, 1 transwiki.) Scimitar 19:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I may be wrong, but I am not certain that this meets the criteria for notability, and context. Had it linked to 'El Carnaval' ... but I do not know the significance of this either. Simon Cursitor 06:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I'm studing reggaeton and I want all the resources I can get.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 10:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Commercial trademark of non-notable product Alex.tan 07:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Merge and delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:24 (UTC)
I really can't see what to do with this except bring it here. I can see no encyclopedic potential for this article. Physchim62 07:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 19:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The term is not used in the english language. Even in Greek it is rarely used as described Sysin 08:27, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:56 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:47 (UTC)
Gaming clan, vfd is questioning the relevance of this article and whether it counts as a vanity page. Firien 08:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Vampire: the Masquerade. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:58 (UTC)
Extremely minor topic that has no scope to exist beyond a minor stub. Should probably just be merged into the Vampire: the Masquerade article. Cyclone49 09:48, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 19:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Marked as speedy, changed by me to vfd. Quattrocchi appears to have been a friend of Rajiv Gandhi and an important player in the Bofors Scandal in the 1980s. Uppland 09:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was apparently already redirected, but that was the result I was about to call for this one anyway. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:27 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 03:22, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Some kid whose claim to fame is bumping into Metallica at an airport. I asked the user to verify this information and his only suggestion was that I write to Lars Ulrich directly. Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 11:32, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Note: Caster Troy ( talk · contribs), Jc57 ( talk · contribs), 163.1.227.76 ( talk · contribs) and 129.67.97.115 ( talk · contribs) may all be the same person - compare user contributions -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 28 June 2005 05:14 (UTC)
Advertising for non-significant wiki. Wiki has only 12 pages in content, most of it testing pages. Znode 11:37, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect to Akilattirattu Ammanai following a merge. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:27 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Akilam One. None of these articles provide any context, none of the titles are known to Google. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:07 (UTC)
A search term used in a cartoon. This is going a bit far in detail of trivia. Not notable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:04 (UTC)
Not notable, google doesn't know him. Feydey 12:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 19:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Taijin kyofusho is only the Japanese translation of anthropophobia/sociophobia, not a culture-bound syndrome. It doesn't merit an independent namespace. Hermeneus 12:37, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was... well apparently redirect but there is no agreement as to where this should be redirected. I will solve this temporarily(?) by making this page a disambiguation between ethanol, the alcohol in wine, and aqua vitae. When agreement is reached as to where this should redirect, or when someone wants to be bold, it can be turned into a redirect. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 11:11 (UTC)
Dicdef.
Physchim62 13:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep, no consensus to delete, with the issue being whether or not Mr. Voirin is notable enough for Wikipedia.
Goldstein307 28 June 2005 17:28 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete
Carbonite |
Talk 28 June 2005 19:21 (UTC)
Delete not notable. Or userfy.Google returns 2 relevant hits from "James Voirin" and one for James Voirin AND JASON project. Appears to be a research student who can make his page when he's made his name.- Splash 14:56, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:29 (UTC)
This article appears to have started as nonsense, someone put it up for Speedy Delete then someone took it off and tried to make it respectable/a real article but as is obvious by all the tags on this that its a very convoluted article and it is not even clear what its on. I looked on Google and cant find anything that corresponds to this at all. I vote delete as it seems to be nonsense that slipped through the cracks. CunningLinguist 15:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Geek Love Radio. Usually 2 deletes and 1 merge will be a consensus to delete, but this time I am calling this a merge instead because a similar VFD debate on Adam Struve is headed for a merge result, and we want some consistency in the results. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:09 (UTC)
12 hits on Google for ("Richard Lech" "geek love") after removing the podcast.net directory. Using (Subzero1037 "geek love") gives 35, all from the same forum site. Might be notable next year if the book makes it big, but I don't think he's notable yet. -- Xcali 16:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Geek Love Radio. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:10 (UTC)
Partner to Richard Lech ( above). Same rationale. A couple more hits than Lech, but it's the same story. They're mostly webforum hits for his username. -- Xcali 16:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:28 (UTC)
Non-notable: google search produced many hits, but all from user profiles or posts on gaming boards, none actual content or commentary on this individual. Also I feel it is likely that this article is merely a vanity page. Gblaz 16:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus (5 votes keep, 3 votes delete). Scimitar 19:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
9 Google hits, only 3 from outside the author's university. I'm sure it's a nice program and the author finds it quite useful, but it's no lsof. -- Xcali 16:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:29, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Newly-created entry about "A flash based version of the classic "whack-a-mole" games." (this is entry's entire content). Googling for "tontie"+"wack-a-mole" returns 167 hits. It seems to be just another one of those games that someone programs, everyone plays for a week, then is quickly forgotten. jglc | t | c 17:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted by Duncharris. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 20:42, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
Non sense, autobiography, autobiografy about his future life and his death. To delete. Cate 17:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 10:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Advertising for a restaurant. Speedy delete? -- Ian Pitchford 17:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 18:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Stub for a non-notable punk band whose name returns 60 hits on Google, many from local punk music forums. jglc | t | c 17:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 18:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Nonnotable precursor to nonnotable band Mob 40s. -- Xcali 18:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 18:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Nonnotable member of nonnotable bands Mob 40s and Since I Was Six. -- Xcali 18:33, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was copyvio, but as article is a duplicate delete and redirect. — Xezbeth 07:15, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, nothing links here, but most importantly this article is a duplicate of Sultan bin Abdul Aziz. This should not be merged because it is copyvio. --- User:Hottentot
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete; however, it was used as a source to List of Latin phrases, so redirect -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:42 (UTC)
No articles link here. NPOV. Essentially an advertisement for Calvinism. I added the phrase "Coram Deo" to List of Latin phrases with a shortened (and more neutral) definition from this article. -- Flex 18:24, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:27 (UTC)
Vanity page. Non-notable teacher of non-notable high school, neither found on Google. Znode 18:36, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I have reformatted this AfD because the old format broke the automated parser. See page history for older deletion request. Mackensen (talk) 21:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:36 (UTC)
Delete.This is non-notable and appears to me to be advertising. I will note that this article was speedied previously, and that the anonymous creator remoeved the speedy delete tag. WAvegetarian 18:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:30 (UTC)
Vanity page of non-notable writer. Play produced not notable, only appears on college website. Weblog obscene. Contains unencyclopedic references. Znode 19:10, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was move discussion to CFD. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL June 30, 2005 00:27 (UTC)
This category has been replaced by Category:Unix_programs/Shells and is no longer necessary. All of the component articles have been moved.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 09:30, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable musician of non-notable backup band. Both musician and band failed Google test. Znode 19:37, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
The result was delete. The keep arguments have not been able to rebuttal the
WP:NEO arguments appropriately. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C} 11:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The article admits to be about a neologism. This is essentially a list of celebrities that died at age 27, with the vague allusion that this may be something special rather than bland coincidence. However, a basic fact of statistics tells us that given a large enough sample size, any number of samples can be found that have an arbitrary trait. This is speculation, trivia, and not encyclopedic. >Radiant< 11:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:19, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:19, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Best I can tell, this was a one-off comment made by a columnist/retired general and posted on [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=18400 a single web site]. No evidence that this nickname was picked up anywhere else, or even re-used by its creator, so it's utterly unnotable. Even a redirect to David Hackworth wouldn't be very useful, because this is from just one of his many, many columns. CDC (talk) 19:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:20, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Neologism. 205.217.105.2 19:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Subject is supposedly a 16-year-old actor. Googling "Dylan Rosenthal" +"Cheaper by the Dozen 2" (his only really notable alleged work) receives 0 hits. [ IMDB Entry] for CbtD2 does not show him. "Dylan Rosenthal" + actor on Google gives three hits, two of which are from a local paper. He seems to be a young actor who may potentially become Wikipedia-worthy, but, as his career stands currently, he is not yet notable enough. Delete. jglc | t | c 20:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:58 (UTC)
Ad. -- W( t) 20:27, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep, no consensus between keep and merge -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:18 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a compilation of browser statistics from a security website. -- W( t) 20:37, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC) I linked the wrong article in the heading, sorry about that. Fixed now. -- W( t) 22:01, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
I think that there is another interesting comparison, for example:
So I think this type of comparison should stay on Wikipedia, because they are interesting and important for many users. They also have relation with topic such as web browsers, security or critism of Microsoft for security of products. They are based on facts and reports from renowned and highly regarded security firm - Secunia and can bee anytime monitored and easily updated.
But I respect your opinion and I wait for result. I won't have been too disappointed and stick around though. -- Ptomes 06:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC), creator of this comparison
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep but move to Toxicity (song). Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 08:40 (UTC)
I don't see why this song needs its own page at all. 86.130.154.235 20:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 07:27, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
del this hoax, unless someone quickly writes a correct stub about the person. mikka (t) 20:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Not sure if this is patent nonsense, so we'll vote. This looks like crap, so unless someone can convince me otherwise, my vote is delete Antares33712 21:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 07:27, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
It's an uncommon phrase with little or no encyclopedic value. Belongs in another wiki Barneygumble 21:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Pointless, useless, ugly, stupid. Oh, also, unencyclopedic. -- jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 21:26, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:08 (UTC)
vanity 80.108.45.253 21:37, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) see at the german deletion vote (home country of Heiko) - there is overwhelming evidence that the painters should not be put in Wikipedia (translation of german phrase "löschen" = "delete") see [23]; Wiki users should develop a good understanding and a sense of sophisticated commercial infiltrations.
comment: german page is already deleted Binter2 15:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was copyvio. — Xezbeth 07:22, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
This article appears to be just a promotional piece for a primary school in Malaysia (the article does not even mention its country). It would need a complete rewrite if it is to be kept. Blainster 22:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was deleted as copyvio by nixie. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL June 30, 2005 00:29 (UTC)
Article about a VH1 special on Playboy and Penthouse models. tregoweth 22:43, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 1 July 2005 23:58 (UTC)
Delete - biography is nonsense. -- RonH 22:55, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Age of Mythology -- cesarb 1 July 2005 23:56 (UTC)
Content already in the AoM page
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:22 (UTC)
Appears to be a fairly straightforward run-of-the-mill vanity page. — Trilobite ( Talk) 23:32, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 1 July 2005 23:53 (UTC)
Either vanity or NN depending on who wrote it. "Kristoffer ericson" jlime gets 26 Google hits. Denni ☯ 23:50, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete -- Francs2000 | Talk 14:51, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:28, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Speculation, no context, no idea what this is talking about. It was added to Columbia Pictures, which I have deleted. Rick K 00:01, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Petaholmes (copyvio june 19) -- cesarb 30 June 2005 00:23 (UTC)
Copyvio (despite the talk page's claim of "fair use"). Even if these weren't copyvio, they could be copied over to Wikisource, but they still don't belong on WP. - Sean Curtin 00:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Only placing this here to be fair, to the user that tried to speedy it. Word appears in a few of our articles, so if it is wrong, Wikipedia en masse needs a good clean-up. I vote keep, obviously :- ) Antares33712 21:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete and redirect. — Xezbeth 16:14, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete - neologism, probably coined by the user of the IP. I suppose this could be unloaded onto to the Wiktionary. - Splash 00:14, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Original research nonsense, non notable. No google hits, created by someone I know, unfortunately. CryptoDerk 00:16, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This stub was adapted from some text that I wrote, by someone not familiar with the material, so it comes off as crackpot. My original text is based on understandings gained from a year and half of reading Thomas Cleary. This is a condensation of study in this school begun around 25 years ago. The wikipedia stub Taogebra may appear offensive on first reading, but I am hoping that it may be given a chance to be edited into credible form. Keep the disclaimer up. I agree with the policy of having a reputable encyclopedia, and I also see room for the valid translation of important ideas. Taogebra is based on concepts I remained sceptical of for a very long time. But to cast it out is to skip a stage in comprehension; to let an over zealous rationalization of an uninformed translation define how we understand. In my studies I learned to accept the valid part of a statement and not be bothered by the rest. 05:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Actually, it's not totally original research since Thomas Cleary writes in "The Secret of the Golden Flower",1991, about the potential for the techniques of the Complete Reality school of Tao [Ch'an, Zen]to be used for general problem solving. I tried to edit some of the bunk out of that entry; it said the edit needs to be merged, which I haven't figured out yet. -fractile *****
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity bio of a "professional pogger". No Google hits I can find. Calton | Talk 00:14, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Flcelloguy Give me a note! Desk 00:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 10:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Denni ☯ 01:52, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Forever Alexa has no purpose on Wikipedia, is self-promoting, and Alexa Vega (of whom I'd never heard) is simply too minor, IMHO. Hope I did this all in decorum. I'm still new. Recnilgiarc 01:56, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep Ben Standeven 23:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
For discussion. Had been marked as speedy by user:Denni for nonsense. See also Talk:Tiamat (Planet) Satori 02:18, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:19, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Besides the fact that we already have an article about the Executor class, the name is misspelled. Kross 02:21, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:19, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
The author has repeatedly reverted any attempt to (reasonably or otherwise) remove the article, or even clean it up. They just got rid of the {{cleanup}} without a single change. No official policy on monikers I suppose. At best, non-encyclopedic, but I'll leave this one to the rest of you.- Splash 02:48, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:19, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, notability not established.- gadfium 03:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:22, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Same case as Hans Nusslein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayumashu ( talk • contribs) 04:51, 26 May 2005
The result of the debate was no consensus. There are six votes to delete, two of which were cast before the article was significantly modified, but which give no alternate instructions (e.g. they do not say delete unless...); there are three votes to keep, plus Uncle G's fairly lengthy discussion noting the modification, which, in combination with his labor in expansion of the article, projects a desire that the article be kept. Counting that as a vote to keep makes it 6-4, ergo, no consensus for deletion. -- BD2412 talk July 2, 2005 04:49 (UTC)
I think the decision to Transwiki this to Wiktionary was a good one. Bang, by itself, is no more encyclopedia-worthy than any other syllable in the Korean language. Therefore, delete. Visviva 03:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:20, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable college newspaper comic strip. — Gwalla | Talk 03:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was SPEEDIED — Gwalla | Talk 04:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Looks to be an advert for a used car dealership. ~~Shiri — Talk~~ 03:55, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy KEEP (nomination retracted)
—
Gwalla |
Talk 23:17, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable audio software.
—
Gwalla |
Talk 04:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:50 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. — Gwalla | Talk 04:32, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Guerin cast] -- Fishcakefillet 16:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:24, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Vanity, it looks like. Bloghate 04:34, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:52 (UTC)
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Seems to be a notable golf course designer, actually, but this article doesn't tell us much of anything and is POV. Nominator abstains from voting. — Gwalla | Talk 04:37, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Ben Standeven 23:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete If every blogger gets a page, we're in trouble. There should be some other type of accomplishment! Bloghate 04:39, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Seems very vanity like Bloghate 04:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 17:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate; reason given was "no information to establish any notability is provided and gets no hits on google". Article does not establish notability: apparently just some guy who emigrated (possibly genealogical vanity?). Broken title too. — Gwalla | Talk 04:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Reads like an ad Bloghate 04:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Reads like an ad Bloghate 04:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedied. — Xezbeth 17:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This was tagged as VfD by someone else, but they never wrote the VfD entry. I am doing it for them. Delete as blatant advertising. — JIP | Talk 05:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Ben Standeven 23:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete There is no category for pencil users, why should there be one for bloggers? Bloghate 05:06, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 17:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Doomed to be non-notable forever. Denni ☯ 01:25, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 17:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Matt Mutino is the head of the Icelandic Phallological Museum. Even if the museum is notable, I tend to doubt its "head phallologist" is. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 06:10, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ambiguous.
There are several interlinked decisions in this thread. It is made more complicated by a very chaotic pagemove history. After carefully reviewing all the comments and the evidence presented (and ignoring the "vote count" because it's not helpful in this case):
Article fails to establish notability. The User has moved Don Black (nationalist) to [[Don Black (racist}]] and then added this non-notable person and tried to create a disambiguation page. Rick K 06:41, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
He has now moved the article under Vfd to Don Black (non-notable person) and the other article to Don Black (racialist). Rick K 07:07, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
"Don Black (activist)" will require another level of disambiguation, since the "Don Black (non-notable person)" may consider himself an activist, and lead to more activity. The "Don Black (racialist)" is most appropriate, as noted above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.200.240.250 ( talk • contribs) 07:48, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Gentlemen -
While I am affiliated with UCI, I am not a professor.
However, there is another Don Black who is notable. He is the classic "Right Stuff" individual. He is a former Executive Vice President and General Manager of the McDonnell-Douglas Corporation. He was a pilot in indonesia during WW-II (flew the hump). He is still saving lives by donating his time to managing an organization that finds shelter for the homeless in Southern California. He also contributes his time to other charitable works such as ensuring open-space will exist in Southern California for our children.
The original generic "Don Black (non-notable)" should be allowed to stand on its own merits as representative of the other Don Blacks.
- Don V Black, Chairman, IEEE Computer Society of Orange County 6/17/05 11:00AM PDT
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.200.241.74 ( talk • contribs) 18:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedied. — Xezbeth 16:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:28, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Advertising -- Ferkelparade π 06:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 16:28, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Not a single Google hit, sounds made up to me -- Ferkelparade π 06:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus (kept) (3 keeps, 2 deletes, 1 transwiki.) Scimitar 19:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I may be wrong, but I am not certain that this meets the criteria for notability, and context. Had it linked to 'El Carnaval' ... but I do not know the significance of this either. Simon Cursitor 06:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I'm studing reggaeton and I want all the resources I can get.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 10:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Commercial trademark of non-notable product Alex.tan 07:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Merge and delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:24 (UTC)
I really can't see what to do with this except bring it here. I can see no encyclopedic potential for this article. Physchim62 07:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 19:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The term is not used in the english language. Even in Greek it is rarely used as described Sysin 08:27, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:56 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:47 (UTC)
Gaming clan, vfd is questioning the relevance of this article and whether it counts as a vanity page. Firien 08:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Vampire: the Masquerade. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 09:58 (UTC)
Extremely minor topic that has no scope to exist beyond a minor stub. Should probably just be merged into the Vampire: the Masquerade article. Cyclone49 09:48, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 19:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Marked as speedy, changed by me to vfd. Quattrocchi appears to have been a friend of Rajiv Gandhi and an important player in the Bofors Scandal in the 1980s. Uppland 09:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was apparently already redirected, but that was the result I was about to call for this one anyway. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:27 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 03:22, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Some kid whose claim to fame is bumping into Metallica at an airport. I asked the user to verify this information and his only suggestion was that I write to Lars Ulrich directly. Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 11:32, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Note: Caster Troy ( talk · contribs), Jc57 ( talk · contribs), 163.1.227.76 ( talk · contribs) and 129.67.97.115 ( talk · contribs) may all be the same person - compare user contributions -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 28 June 2005 05:14 (UTC)
Advertising for non-significant wiki. Wiki has only 12 pages in content, most of it testing pages. Znode 11:37, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect to Akilattirattu Ammanai following a merge. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:27 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Akilam One. None of these articles provide any context, none of the titles are known to Google. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 30 June 2005 16:07 (UTC)
A search term used in a cartoon. This is going a bit far in detail of trivia. Not notable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:04 (UTC)
Not notable, google doesn't know him. Feydey 12:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 19:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Taijin kyofusho is only the Japanese translation of anthropophobia/sociophobia, not a culture-bound syndrome. It doesn't merit an independent namespace. Hermeneus 12:37, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was... well apparently redirect but there is no agreement as to where this should be redirected. I will solve this temporarily(?) by making this page a disambiguation between ethanol, the alcohol in wine, and aqua vitae. When agreement is reached as to where this should redirect, or when someone wants to be bold, it can be turned into a redirect. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 11:11 (UTC)
Dicdef.
Physchim62 13:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep, no consensus to delete, with the issue being whether or not Mr. Voirin is notable enough for Wikipedia.
Goldstein307 28 June 2005 17:28 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete
Carbonite |
Talk 28 June 2005 19:21 (UTC)
Delete not notable. Or userfy.Google returns 2 relevant hits from "James Voirin" and one for James Voirin AND JASON project. Appears to be a research student who can make his page when he's made his name.- Splash 14:56, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:29 (UTC)
This article appears to have started as nonsense, someone put it up for Speedy Delete then someone took it off and tried to make it respectable/a real article but as is obvious by all the tags on this that its a very convoluted article and it is not even clear what its on. I looked on Google and cant find anything that corresponds to this at all. I vote delete as it seems to be nonsense that slipped through the cracks. CunningLinguist 15:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Geek Love Radio. Usually 2 deletes and 1 merge will be a consensus to delete, but this time I am calling this a merge instead because a similar VFD debate on Adam Struve is headed for a merge result, and we want some consistency in the results. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:09 (UTC)
12 hits on Google for ("Richard Lech" "geek love") after removing the podcast.net directory. Using (Subzero1037 "geek love") gives 35, all from the same forum site. Might be notable next year if the book makes it big, but I don't think he's notable yet. -- Xcali 16:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Geek Love Radio. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:10 (UTC)
Partner to Richard Lech ( above). Same rationale. A couple more hits than Lech, but it's the same story. They're mostly webforum hits for his username. -- Xcali 16:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:28 (UTC)
Non-notable: google search produced many hits, but all from user profiles or posts on gaming boards, none actual content or commentary on this individual. Also I feel it is likely that this article is merely a vanity page. Gblaz 16:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus (5 votes keep, 3 votes delete). Scimitar 19:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
9 Google hits, only 3 from outside the author's university. I'm sure it's a nice program and the author finds it quite useful, but it's no lsof. -- Xcali 16:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:29, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Newly-created entry about "A flash based version of the classic "whack-a-mole" games." (this is entry's entire content). Googling for "tontie"+"wack-a-mole" returns 167 hits. It seems to be just another one of those games that someone programs, everyone plays for a week, then is quickly forgotten. jglc | t | c 17:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted by Duncharris. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL 20:42, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
Non sense, autobiography, autobiografy about his future life and his death. To delete. Cate 17:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 10:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Advertising for a restaurant. Speedy delete? -- Ian Pitchford 17:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 18:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Stub for a non-notable punk band whose name returns 60 hits on Google, many from local punk music forums. jglc | t | c 17:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 18:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Nonnotable precursor to nonnotable band Mob 40s. -- Xcali 18:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 18:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Nonnotable member of nonnotable bands Mob 40s and Since I Was Six. -- Xcali 18:33, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was copyvio, but as article is a duplicate delete and redirect. — Xezbeth 07:15, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, nothing links here, but most importantly this article is a duplicate of Sultan bin Abdul Aziz. This should not be merged because it is copyvio. --- User:Hottentot
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete; however, it was used as a source to List of Latin phrases, so redirect -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:42 (UTC)
No articles link here. NPOV. Essentially an advertisement for Calvinism. I added the phrase "Coram Deo" to List of Latin phrases with a shortened (and more neutral) definition from this article. -- Flex 18:24, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:27 (UTC)
Vanity page. Non-notable teacher of non-notable high school, neither found on Google. Znode 18:36, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I have reformatted this AfD because the old format broke the automated parser. See page history for older deletion request. Mackensen (talk) 21:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:36 (UTC)
Delete.This is non-notable and appears to me to be advertising. I will note that this article was speedied previously, and that the anonymous creator remoeved the speedy delete tag. WAvegetarian 18:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:30 (UTC)
Vanity page of non-notable writer. Play produced not notable, only appears on college website. Weblog obscene. Contains unencyclopedic references. Znode 19:10, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was move discussion to CFD. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL June 30, 2005 00:27 (UTC)
This category has been replaced by Category:Unix_programs/Shells and is no longer necessary. All of the component articles have been moved.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Sjakkalle
(Check!) 09:30, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable musician of non-notable backup band. Both musician and band failed Google test. Znode 19:37, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
The result was delete. The keep arguments have not been able to rebuttal the
WP:NEO arguments appropriately. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C} 11:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The article admits to be about a neologism. This is essentially a list of celebrities that died at age 27, with the vague allusion that this may be something special rather than bland coincidence. However, a basic fact of statistics tells us that given a large enough sample size, any number of samples can be found that have an arbitrary trait. This is speculation, trivia, and not encyclopedic. >Radiant< 11:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:19, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:19, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Best I can tell, this was a one-off comment made by a columnist/retired general and posted on [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=18400 a single web site]. No evidence that this nickname was picked up anywhere else, or even re-used by its creator, so it's utterly unnotable. Even a redirect to David Hackworth wouldn't be very useful, because this is from just one of his many, many columns. CDC (talk) 19:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:20, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Neologism. 205.217.105.2 19:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Subject is supposedly a 16-year-old actor. Googling "Dylan Rosenthal" +"Cheaper by the Dozen 2" (his only really notable alleged work) receives 0 hits. [ IMDB Entry] for CbtD2 does not show him. "Dylan Rosenthal" + actor on Google gives three hits, two of which are from a local paper. He seems to be a young actor who may potentially become Wikipedia-worthy, but, as his career stands currently, he is not yet notable enough. Delete. jglc | t | c 20:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 13:58 (UTC)
Ad. -- W( t) 20:27, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep, no consensus between keep and merge -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:18 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a compilation of browser statistics from a security website. -- W( t) 20:37, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC) I linked the wrong article in the heading, sorry about that. Fixed now. -- W( t) 22:01, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
I think that there is another interesting comparison, for example:
So I think this type of comparison should stay on Wikipedia, because they are interesting and important for many users. They also have relation with topic such as web browsers, security or critism of Microsoft for security of products. They are based on facts and reports from renowned and highly regarded security firm - Secunia and can bee anytime monitored and easily updated.
But I respect your opinion and I wait for result. I won't have been too disappointed and stick around though. -- Ptomes 06:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC), creator of this comparison
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep but move to Toxicity (song). Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 08:40 (UTC)
I don't see why this song needs its own page at all. 86.130.154.235 20:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 07:27, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
del this hoax, unless someone quickly writes a correct stub about the person. mikka (t) 20:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Not sure if this is patent nonsense, so we'll vote. This looks like crap, so unless someone can convince me otherwise, my vote is delete Antares33712 21:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. — Xezbeth 07:27, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
It's an uncommon phrase with little or no encyclopedic value. Belongs in another wiki Barneygumble 21:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Pointless, useless, ugly, stupid. Oh, also, unencyclopedic. -- jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 21:26, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 2 July 2005 00:08 (UTC)
vanity 80.108.45.253 21:37, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) see at the german deletion vote (home country of Heiko) - there is overwhelming evidence that the painters should not be put in Wikipedia (translation of german phrase "löschen" = "delete") see [23]; Wiki users should develop a good understanding and a sense of sophisticated commercial infiltrations.
comment: german page is already deleted Binter2 15:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was copyvio. — Xezbeth 07:22, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
This article appears to be just a promotional piece for a primary school in Malaysia (the article does not even mention its country). It would need a complete rewrite if it is to be kept. Blainster 22:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was deleted as copyvio by nixie. AиDя01D TALK EMAIL June 30, 2005 00:29 (UTC)
Article about a VH1 special on Playboy and Penthouse models. tregoweth 22:43, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 1 July 2005 23:58 (UTC)
Delete - biography is nonsense. -- RonH 22:55, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Age of Mythology -- cesarb 1 July 2005 23:56 (UTC)
Content already in the AoM page
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 10:22 (UTC)
Appears to be a fairly straightforward run-of-the-mill vanity page. — Trilobite ( Talk) 23:32, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete -- cesarb 1 July 2005 23:53 (UTC)
Either vanity or NN depending on who wrote it. "Kristoffer ericson" jlime gets 26 Google hits. Denni ☯ 23:50, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete -- Francs2000 | Talk 14:51, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. — Xezbeth 07:28, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
Speculation, no context, no idea what this is talking about. It was added to Columbia Pictures, which I have deleted. Rick K 00:01, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Petaholmes (copyvio june 19) -- cesarb 30 June 2005 00:23 (UTC)
Copyvio (despite the talk page's claim of "fair use"). Even if these weren't copyvio, they could be copied over to Wikisource, but they still don't belong on WP. - Sean Curtin 00:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)