Merging small articles of limited scope into broader articles is always a good thing.
Conversely, splitting particularly long, broad articles into smaller articles is not a bad thing.
The
notability and encyclopedic-ness of a topic should dictate whether it belongs on Wikipedia, not the quality of the current content.
My contributions
As of
29 December2006, I've made about
1100 edits. Listed here are what I consider to be some of my more significant contributions. I'm usually fairly bold in updating minor things, which aren't listed here.
Merging small articles of limited scope into broader articles is always a good thing.
Conversely, splitting particularly long, broad articles into smaller articles is not a bad thing.
The
notability and encyclopedic-ness of a topic should dictate whether it belongs on Wikipedia, not the quality of the current content.
My contributions
As of
29 December2006, I've made about
1100 edits. Listed here are what I consider to be some of my more significant contributions. I'm usually fairly bold in updating minor things, which aren't listed here.