Points of interest related to Business on Wikipedia: Outline –  Portal –  Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Stubs – Assessment

Points of interest related to Companies on Wikipedia: Portal –  Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Assessment – To-do

Deletion Sorting Project
( talk) Project page Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic) Lists (computer-readable) AfD: Today, Yesterday Delsort scripts
v t e

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Business. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Business|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions ( prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Business. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{ transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{ prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business/archive
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business/archive 2
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business/archive 3

Bollywood Hungama Style Icons

Bollywood Hungama Style Icons (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable award show sourced mainly to the parent company Bollywood Hungama. Sources I find are all unreliable or just verification of winners. Would redirect but we know how that goes so suggesting a redirect as an WP:ATD here in case full deletion is not in order. CNMall41 ( talk) 20:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and India. Shellwood ( talk) 20:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, Entertainment, Politics, Business, Fashion, Sports, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to Bollywood Hungama. A WP:BEFORE search turned up no independent and reliable sources for the event itself on the web, Google News, Google Books, Yandex etc. Since there is a lack of independent, reliable sources with SIGCOV, the article fails WP:GNG and the supplementary essay WP:NAWARDS. However, a redirect could be made to Bollywood Hungama and a brief mention could be added there for the award. The Night Watch (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

TalentEgg

TalentEgg (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated for speedy deletion in September 2021. Article unchanged since then but does not meet WP:NORG. Orange sticker ( talk) 10:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Internet, and Canada. Orange sticker ( talk) 10:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Zygote Media Group

Zygote Media Group (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unsure why the last AfD nom was speedy closed by a non-admin, but there is a distinct lack of sourcing for this item. It's been tagged since 2006 and has not improved. I find nothing about this group other than the Google Body app that was taken over by them when Google discontinued it. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment: I closed my own AfD as speedy keep as I found [ [1]] and [ [2]] just after submitting it but I'm not super convinced that there is enough here. Let'srun ( talk) 01:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Companies, Medicine, Technology, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. I don't think the sources listed above by Let'srun are enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Sal2100 ( talk) 18:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Unable to find the sources needed to meet WP:NCORP. Let'srun ( talk) 14:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: I'm having trouble finding strong sources to back up the info in this article. Maybe letting this one go might be the best course of action. Waqar 💬 18:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Cambodia's Kitchen

Cambodia's Kitchen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An orphan article. Getting 2 reviews in the Melbourne press really isn't a big claim for notability as per WP:AUD. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 12:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Cambodia, and Australia. LibStar ( talk) 12:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. Rodell, Besha (2022-08-30). "Cambodia's Kitchen brings a taste of Cambodia to the CBD". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 2024-07-04. Retrieved 2024-07-04.

     This review appeared in both The Sydney Morning Herald's Good Weekend magazine and in The Age here. The review notes: "My worry is that many of the dishes that really set Cambodian cuisine apart aren't represented here. I was hoping to find amok, or nom banh chok, a fragrant fish, coconut and noodle soup. ... But there are vast differences between Cambodia's Kitchen and many of the other nearby quick-service noodle joints. Everything here is made in-house, including the beef balls and fish cakes, things that almost universally come from a packet."

  2. "Australia Travel: Best places to eat in Melbourne". The New Zealand Herald. 2022-11-20. Archived from the original on 2024-07-04. Retrieved 2024-07-04.

     The article provides 144 words of coverage about the subject. The review notes: "I love discovering cuisines that are under-represented back home and Melbourne offers plenty of that. Cambodia’s Kitchen is the only Cambodian eatery in the central city and when I visited, it was well-patronised by Khmer-speaking customers. The noodle soups are signature here, and I was chuffed with my pick of beef noodle soup – a thick and aromatic broth packed with a very generous serving of slow-cooked succulent chunks of beef shin as well as tendon, tripe, and housemade bouncy beef balls."

  3. Monssen, Kara (2022-11-16). "Cambodia's Kitchen review 2022: Chinatown newcomer behind city's great-value lunch spot". Herald Sun. Archived from the original on 2023-07-02. Retrieved 2024-07-04.

     The review notes: "Linna and brother Ivanra keep it simple at their Russell St restaurant. Think 44 seats inside a ho-hum dining room, flanked either side with decorative awnings and ornamental wicker lamp shades overhead. A soundtrack of Selena Gomez and Taylor Swift buzzes from the speakers. The menu has photos of each dish and is printed out and slotted into a plastic display folder."

  4. Sweet, Frank (2023-06-30). "Melbourne's best hot pots". Time Out. Archived from the original on 2024-07-04. Retrieved 2024-07-04.

     The review provides 167 words of coverage about the subject. The review notes: "If there’s a hot pot you’re yet to try on this list, it’s probably this one. Fairly new to the scene having opened in 2022, Cambodia’s Kitchen is still regarded as a well-kept secret among hot pot lovers and multiculturally adventurous foodies alike. The cosy Russell St restaurant serves authentic classic Cambodian fare, a rich noodle soup (kuyteav) being undisputedly the star of the entire operation and what many street vendors in Phnom Penh typically sell for breakfast."

  5. Curran, Libby (2022-08-18). "Cambodia's Kitchen Is the New CBD Restaurant Paying Homage to Classic Cambodian Fare". Concrete Playground. Archived from the original on 2024-07-04. Retrieved 2024-07-04.

     The review notes: "Here at Cambodia's Kitchen, the Huns' long-held family recipes and use of traditional techniques deliver an accurate reflection of what's being cooked up on the streets of Phnom Penh. Linna's menu draws plenty of inspiration from her own mother's and grandmother's cooking. The signature Cambodian rice noodle soup is the hero offering — a pork broth base loaded with minced and sliced pork, pork liver, and homemade beef balls, fish balls, fish cake and pork loaf."

     • Here ^{Internet Archive} is Concrete Playground's editorial policy. Here is information in the editorial policy that supports its being reliable:
       1. Its editor is Samantha Teague.
       2. "Concrete Playground is Australia's fourth largest independently-owned digital publisher (Nielsen Market Intelligence, July 2018),"
       3. "All facts need to be thoroughly checked by both writers and editors before publishing — we have a duty to our readers to provide them with well-researched, accurate information."
       4. "Direct quotes cannot be altered, and subjects do not have any approval over their quotes."
       5. "Corrections will only be made to a published piece if something is found to be factually incorrect. If a change is made to a published article, a dated amendment will be added to the footer to acknowledge the original piece has been edited."
       6. "All writers must disclose any possible conflict of interest on any piece of work they submit. This must then be disclosed at the footer of the published piece."
       7. "We regularly critique restaurants and bars, and cultural events. These judgements are entirely our own and are only made after experiencing the subject first-hand. All positive and negative feedback must be backed up by reasoning."
       8. "Opinion pieces (including our restaurant and film reviews) are entirely independent and are never produced in partnership with a third party."
       Concrete Playground is cited as a source by a number of books, which also supports its being reliable. Here are the publishers and links to the books that cited Concrete Playground: Academic Press ( 1), Johns Hopkins University Press ( 1), Routledge ( 1 and 2), Taylor & Francis ( 1), and Text Publishing ( 1).
  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Cambodia's Kitchen to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard ( talk) 10:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Flexcon

Flexcon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable business, article created for promotional purposes. -- Beland ( talk) 17:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Beland ( talk) 17:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 15:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete, fails WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Ednabrenze ( talk) 19:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Association for Business Communication

Association for Business Communication (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, cannot find sources besides routine press releases. Fails WP:NORG Jay Jay ^{What did I do?} 21:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals, Organizations, Business, Illinois, New York, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete wikipedia articles require secondary sources. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment Article was PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply