This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 20, 2023.
Another one that needs to stay at Wookieepedia. Absolutely zero significance, only appearing in a literal handful of comics. Delete. TNstingray ( talk) 16:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:42, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
As such, the list contains only information from the Skywalker Saga films, the 2008 animated TV series Star Wars: The Clone Wars, and other films, shows, or video games published or produced after April 2014.This is the current list criteria, which the character does not meet as he does not appear in the visual medium. TNstingray ( talk) 12:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This incomplete list of characters from the Star Wars franchise contains only those which are considered part of the official Star Wars canon, as of the changes made by Lucasfilm in April 2014and the comic books are very much part of that canon. There's no principled reason why minor characters who appear briefly in an animated show or video game are included, but characters with significant and in-depth real world coverage and analysis like Doctor Aphra and Jaxxon (less news media hits because older, but more coverage in academic books and articles because of his prominence of Disney's less than stellar development of its non-movie characters) are not. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow •
talk
23:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 29#I Am the Very Model of a Scientist Salarian
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 29#Dab hand
Demoncrats currently redirects to Democratic Party (United States). However, "Demoncrats" is not written in the body of the article. The term is noted in some academic literature (e.g., Shofner, 1978; [https:doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00089-2 Havey, 2020]), though not all sources discuss the modern Democratic Party in the US (e.g., Green, 2014). At present, no articles link to Demoncrats. Significa liberdade ( talk) 23:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
8. If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. (2 of 4) MicrobiologyMarcus ( petri dish• cultures) 19:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
From what I can tell, this is a pejorative term related to a conspiracy theory of Jewish supremacy. I cannot find this specific term in any academic literature or in mainstream news outlets, though the related term Jewnited States has been named in academic literature ( Clark, 1990; Kimmell, 2003). At present, Jewnited Kingdom redirects to the United Kingdom, but nothing links to it. If we were to keep it, I would recommend redirecting to Antisemitism in the United Kingdom. Significa liberdade ( talk) 23:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Trying this deletion request again per WP:UFILM as page views are virtually nonexistent now. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I'm currently bringing WikiProject Coldplay back from inactivity and this shortcut is too specific, it references a song from the band instead of their own name. The WP:COLDPLAY shortcut is enough already. GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 13:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
This is just the word "Russia" three times. The three repetitions do not appear to be significant from Google searches, and this sequence is not mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
17:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
12:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
This phrase has a wide variety of meanings: Donald Trump's contribution to an increase in racially inflammatory speech, his contribution to increased bullying in schools, his contribution to new aesthetic developments in contemporary art, and so on. None of these are discussed in the target article, where the title phrase also isn't used, and none seem to be discussed in any depth in any other article. This seems like a plausible search term but one that's fundamentally so ambiguous that any given target will be more confusing than helpful. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 11:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
German translation of title; delete per WP:RLANG. ArcticSeeress ( talk) 21:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
It was also the most popular film in Germany with admissions of 13 million, ranking third of all timelends sufficient affinity for the German language, in my opinion. I will note that the redirect is currently employed at Unter falscher Flagge. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
someone finds it useful) under WP:R#KEEP, especially in light of Tavix's point above. ButlerBlog ( talk) 12:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. My comment is arguing that the film is not related to German culture, and therefore a German-language redirect should not exist. Judging from your reply, it seems my comment was too concise to actually engage with. I'm sorry for that. Also, I'd like some clarification: is "one could possibly argue" meant to signify that you're arguing in favour of keeping the redirect based on that criterion? ArcticSeeress ( talk) 20:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Duckmather (
talk)
01:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:RFD#D2: the redirect is in a similar vain to number articles in Wikipedia, compare 4 or 12.
Additionally, I'd also argue WP:RFD#D8. Yes, the number 24269 is cited in the article as the documentary number, but no is going to search for the document by only its number and nothing else. Ted52 ( talk) 07:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
not mentioned at target - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 07:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I declined a G6 speedy on these as out-of-process, and G14 would not apply because the target is a DAB (which I'm going to convert into a list of lists in a sec, but that's still DAB-like for G14's purposes). However, miscapitalized "(disambiguation)" titles are not helpful except when there's significant page history, so I bring this here for consideration of non-speedy deletion. -- Tamzin[ cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 03:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
It doesn't seem that this is the only meaning of the emoji (its name is "Men with Bunny Ears"). Qwerfjkl talk 17:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, keep, retarget to
Miscellaneous Symbols and Pictographs, or refine to
Playboy Bunny#International icon?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Duckmather (
talk)
03:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 7#💁♀️
Delete A web search shows various pages describing different dinosaur genera as "bird-like reptiles", but I'm not seeing that term used for any broader group of dinosaurs. Ornithischia is the group of dinosaurs that did NOT evolve into birds, so the current target is not a good choice.
I would expect somebody who would use this as a searching term is looking for a topic more specific than dinosaur, but there are many topics they might be searching. This is a descriptive phrase, and not a term with any specific referents, so a disambiguation page would not be appropriate. Plantdrew ( talk) 01:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I can't see [...] that this is the primary topic across all uses(non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 17:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Rattling a cage is an idiom, and does not appear to be highly associated with this particular race. Granted, this phrase does show up in the article once, as something Dale Earnhardt said during a post-race statement. Besides that though, as "rattling a cage" is used often outside of this context, there is also Rattle The Cage and Rattle the Cage which are different topics that directly refer to cage-rattling as part of the subject name. Or deletion, if no better topic can be found. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Labonte finished in 8th, and one lap down. Earnhardt's victory was subsequently met by boos and obscene gestures from the crowd. NASCAR officials reviewed the pass but decided to let Earnhardt keep the victory. Earnhardt later stated, "I didn’t mean to wreck him, I just wanted to rattle his cage a bit."so I think it should be fine to keep Tartar Torte 12:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
16:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or soft redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥
𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆
(𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥
00:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 20, 2023.
Another one that needs to stay at Wookieepedia. Absolutely zero significance, only appearing in a literal handful of comics. Delete. TNstingray ( talk) 16:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:42, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
As such, the list contains only information from the Skywalker Saga films, the 2008 animated TV series Star Wars: The Clone Wars, and other films, shows, or video games published or produced after April 2014.This is the current list criteria, which the character does not meet as he does not appear in the visual medium. TNstingray ( talk) 12:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This incomplete list of characters from the Star Wars franchise contains only those which are considered part of the official Star Wars canon, as of the changes made by Lucasfilm in April 2014and the comic books are very much part of that canon. There's no principled reason why minor characters who appear briefly in an animated show or video game are included, but characters with significant and in-depth real world coverage and analysis like Doctor Aphra and Jaxxon (less news media hits because older, but more coverage in academic books and articles because of his prominence of Disney's less than stellar development of its non-movie characters) are not. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow •
talk
23:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 29#I Am the Very Model of a Scientist Salarian
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 29#Dab hand
Demoncrats currently redirects to Democratic Party (United States). However, "Demoncrats" is not written in the body of the article. The term is noted in some academic literature (e.g., Shofner, 1978; [https:doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00089-2 Havey, 2020]), though not all sources discuss the modern Democratic Party in the US (e.g., Green, 2014). At present, no articles link to Demoncrats. Significa liberdade ( talk) 23:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
8. If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. (2 of 4) MicrobiologyMarcus ( petri dish• cultures) 19:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
From what I can tell, this is a pejorative term related to a conspiracy theory of Jewish supremacy. I cannot find this specific term in any academic literature or in mainstream news outlets, though the related term Jewnited States has been named in academic literature ( Clark, 1990; Kimmell, 2003). At present, Jewnited Kingdom redirects to the United Kingdom, but nothing links to it. If we were to keep it, I would recommend redirecting to Antisemitism in the United Kingdom. Significa liberdade ( talk) 23:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Trying this deletion request again per WP:UFILM as page views are virtually nonexistent now. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I'm currently bringing WikiProject Coldplay back from inactivity and this shortcut is too specific, it references a song from the band instead of their own name. The WP:COLDPLAY shortcut is enough already. GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 13:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
This is just the word "Russia" three times. The three repetitions do not appear to be significant from Google searches, and this sequence is not mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
17:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
12:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
This phrase has a wide variety of meanings: Donald Trump's contribution to an increase in racially inflammatory speech, his contribution to increased bullying in schools, his contribution to new aesthetic developments in contemporary art, and so on. None of these are discussed in the target article, where the title phrase also isn't used, and none seem to be discussed in any depth in any other article. This seems like a plausible search term but one that's fundamentally so ambiguous that any given target will be more confusing than helpful. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 11:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
German translation of title; delete per WP:RLANG. ArcticSeeress ( talk) 21:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
It was also the most popular film in Germany with admissions of 13 million, ranking third of all timelends sufficient affinity for the German language, in my opinion. I will note that the redirect is currently employed at Unter falscher Flagge. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
someone finds it useful) under WP:R#KEEP, especially in light of Tavix's point above. ButlerBlog ( talk) 12:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. My comment is arguing that the film is not related to German culture, and therefore a German-language redirect should not exist. Judging from your reply, it seems my comment was too concise to actually engage with. I'm sorry for that. Also, I'd like some clarification: is "one could possibly argue" meant to signify that you're arguing in favour of keeping the redirect based on that criterion? ArcticSeeress ( talk) 20:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Duckmather (
talk)
01:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:RFD#D2: the redirect is in a similar vain to number articles in Wikipedia, compare 4 or 12.
Additionally, I'd also argue WP:RFD#D8. Yes, the number 24269 is cited in the article as the documentary number, but no is going to search for the document by only its number and nothing else. Ted52 ( talk) 07:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
not mentioned at target - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 07:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I declined a G6 speedy on these as out-of-process, and G14 would not apply because the target is a DAB (which I'm going to convert into a list of lists in a sec, but that's still DAB-like for G14's purposes). However, miscapitalized "(disambiguation)" titles are not helpful except when there's significant page history, so I bring this here for consideration of non-speedy deletion. -- Tamzin[ cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 03:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
It doesn't seem that this is the only meaning of the emoji (its name is "Men with Bunny Ears"). Qwerfjkl talk 17:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, keep, retarget to
Miscellaneous Symbols and Pictographs, or refine to
Playboy Bunny#International icon?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Duckmather (
talk)
03:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 7#💁♀️
Delete A web search shows various pages describing different dinosaur genera as "bird-like reptiles", but I'm not seeing that term used for any broader group of dinosaurs. Ornithischia is the group of dinosaurs that did NOT evolve into birds, so the current target is not a good choice.
I would expect somebody who would use this as a searching term is looking for a topic more specific than dinosaur, but there are many topics they might be searching. This is a descriptive phrase, and not a term with any specific referents, so a disambiguation page would not be appropriate. Plantdrew ( talk) 01:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I can't see [...] that this is the primary topic across all uses(non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 17:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Rattling a cage is an idiom, and does not appear to be highly associated with this particular race. Granted, this phrase does show up in the article once, as something Dale Earnhardt said during a post-race statement. Besides that though, as "rattling a cage" is used often outside of this context, there is also Rattle The Cage and Rattle the Cage which are different topics that directly refer to cage-rattling as part of the subject name. Or deletion, if no better topic can be found. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Labonte finished in 8th, and one lap down. Earnhardt's victory was subsequently met by boos and obscene gestures from the crowd. NASCAR officials reviewed the pass but decided to let Earnhardt keep the victory. Earnhardt later stated, "I didn’t mean to wreck him, I just wanted to rattle his cage a bit."so I think it should be fine to keep Tartar Torte 12:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
16:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or soft redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥
𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆
(𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥
00:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)