The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• White working class → Working class in the United States#Political role of the white working class  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This is a redirect from a non-specific term to a U.S.-specific article. The phrase "white working class" and the corresponding sociological category is frequently used in the UK and, I imagine, elsewhere. I haven't been able to identify any better targets, and note that an article on this topic was deleted in 2010, so I think this should be deleted. –  Arms & Hearts ( talk) 21:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Most certainly not specific to US, and no good target. A Google search for 'white working class uk' gave 2.9M hits; including, on the first page, full matches from The Guardian, the BBC, The Times and Oxford University. Narky Blert ( talk) 06:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - I think that ' White working class in the United Kingdom' and ' White working class in the United States' both merit articles, and if/when they're made we can have ' White working class' be a disambiguation page. Until then, deletion seems to be the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 10:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I concur. Narky Blert ( talk) 15:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Cart with no prejudice against disambiguation. I'm not sure what a disambiguation would look like, so I'm not going to be the one to do it. Instead, I'm retargeting to the broadest option presented, which has the added benefit of matching pedal cart. If it is to be disambiguated, it should probably be done at the other title, keeping in mind that "pedal cart" should be an attested term for those types of carts. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 02:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Pedal-cart → Surrey (carriage)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No mention of pedals at the target, which states that these were primarily horse-drawn. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Quadracycle AKA pedal car. A typical surrey both is horse-drawn and has a fringe on top. Narky Blert ( talk) 18:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment. I've found the surrey connection - International Surrey Company, who make quadracycles. Narky Blert ( talk) 18:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Cycle rickshaw. The current target is clearly inappropriate, it's both overspecific and apparently incorrect, and I felt that is the most reasonable interpretation of the meaning. I wouldn't disagree with Narky Blert's suggestion of Quadracycle either - though a pedal cart does not need to have four wheels. ~ mazca ^talk 18:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Cart. A "pedal car" is not a "pedal cart". A Surrey isn't a pedal cart either. Pedal cart redirects to Cart where the subject is mentioned. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 13:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Dabify to all suggested retarget locations -- 65.94.170.207 ( talk) 12:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Disambiguate - Multiple entities exist that can plausibly be labeled as a 'pedal cart'. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 01:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I can only see 2 article that might qualify: Cart, and (at a stretch) Cycle rickshaw. If there's going to be a disambiguation page it should be a conversion of Pedal cart. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Template:0-7110-0554-0 → Template:Casserley-LocoGrouping3  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Template:0-7110-0553-2 → Template:Casserley-LocoGrouping2  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Template:0-905878-06-X → Template:Tourret-Allied Military Locomotives  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Redirect that is just an ISBN; template names transcluded in articles should give some hint what they are about. Transclusions of this redirect should be replaced by the target template name. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 22:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Weak delete - I'm not too sure about this one. Still, I agree with the general principle that redirects ought to give some clear-cut sense of what the target will be. Nobody (as far as I know) memorizes the ISBN numbers of books that they like. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 05:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep – Sometimes when I have need of one of these templates, I get the name of the template wrong. So then I have to go to Category:Rail transport book citation templates and find it. But finding the template via an ISBN redirect is easy – I just look at the back cover of the book I'm using as a reference, and usually there is the ISBN. That's why I named the template that way (before someone moved it). – Iain Bell ( talk) 21:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Pinging CoffeeWithMarkets and Iain Bell in case they desire to modify their votes per the relisting comment above. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep all. The first two are used, so I'd say they're useful. Redirects are cheap, and unless this is proven to be ambiguous, I don't think there's a major reason to remove the transclusions and delete. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep all per Iain Bell as useful and not harmful. —  J947 ^[cont] 20:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment – my comments on one apply equally to all three; I just didn't get round to !voting on the other two, so Keep all. – Iain Bell ( talk) 22:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Upon some more thought, I've changed my mind and consider that these may be useful. I suppose that I'm now neutral here. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 23:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep all. Unambiguous and useful, so deletion will cause harm without bringing any benefits. Thryduulf ( talk) 16:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to 2005 in UFC. The discussion is more of a no consensus, but retargeting seems preferable to closing as such. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• UFC Ultimate Fight Night → List of UFC events  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Either retarget to 2005 in UFC to match redirects of other less notable MMA cards and add relevant information there (for example, UFC on FX 3 redirects to the relevant section of the event in 2012 in UFC), or delete it due to minor mentions in current and proposed targets. (The redirect was protected due to repeated recreations as a separate page, as a result I am unable to add an RFD tag.) FMecha ( to talk| to see log) 13:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - I'm inclined to simply get rid of this because it appears to be an essentially non-notable event and thus shouldn't be mentioned on the potential target article. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 04:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Comment: Should decision goes to deletion, the page would also needs salting. FMecha ( to talk| to see log) 15:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget, the 2005 article already mentions it in the events list (under the name "UFC Fight Night"). Peter James ( talk) 13:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft redirect to wikt:covidiot, which has the momentum. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Covidiot → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, making the redirect less than useful. Originally this page was created as a G11'able article, but it has since been converted to a redirect. This term has seen some use in reputable news sources, so a sourced mention could probably be added to the current target, but I think this is trivial enough that it probably shouldn't, in which case the redirect should be deleted. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep per WP:R#K3 and WP:R#K5.-- Laun chba ller 21:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Launchballer, care to elaborate? "Covidiot" isn't mentioned at the target, so it's not clear how the redirect would be useful to a reader. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply

With your argument, redirects like COVIDemic should also be deleted. -- Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from the covidiot} 06:16, 19 April 2020‎ (UTC) reply

• Delete. If there were mentions of people recklessly endangering the lives of others by refusing to follow safety guidelines I would change my decision to a weak keep. Otherwise it's a loaded term (and possibly falls under WP:NEO) that doesn't contribute to much. — Tenryuu 🐲 (  💬 •  📝 ) 02:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete As I learned the hard way during Hulk Hogan's non-existent 2020 presidential run, these things need to be in the target article, as opposed to merely letting their absence do the talking. InedibleHulk ( talk) 03:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Obscure neologism that isn't at the target and, given the lack of reliable source usage, shouldn't be. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 04:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment I agree with the rationale for deletion, but I wonder, would Misinformation related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic perhaps be a better target? {{u| Sdkb}}  ^talk 04:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  Not by the same rationale, no. Equally as bad as everywhere. First article to openly discuss it wins, unless the next article discusses it in greater detail. InedibleHulk ( talk) 05:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  As true as I personally believe that to be, it's a charged word and not fit for Wikipedia by just association. If more reliable sources pick it up I'll reconsider my stance. — Tenryuu 🐲 (  💬 •  📝 ) 07:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Presumably a neologism. Not mentioned anywhere; therefore no target with any useful information, which is what matters. Narky Blert ( talk) 05:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete As above. Robertpedley ( talk) 13:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete For reasons the reasons mentioned before. Zoozaz1 ( talk)
• Delete borderline WP:G10 content. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 05:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• I had a look for some content related to people who engage in antisocial behaviour related to the virus, and shaming thereof, but couldn't find anything.
• Keep totally plausible and can be mentioned in the article. See [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Praxidicae. -- Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from the covidiot} 05:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Soft redirect to wikt:covidiot where the term is defined. b uidh e 18:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Soft retarget to wikt:covidiot per Buidhe as the best we can do for the readers – which is the key part of RfD. —  J947 ^[cont] 20:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per noms rationale. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 22:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Soft redirect to Wiktionary, per Praxidicae, Buidhe, and J947. This is pretty notable as far as neologisms go (see GNews results) - not notable enough for a WP article, and probably undue as a section in an existing article - but notable enough that readers will search for it. The Wiktionary entry provides what readers are looking for. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 16:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to the relevant entry on Wiktionary 53zodiac ( talk) 23:28, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Soft redirect to Wiktionary per others. Even the Tesla CEO Elon Musk is known as a covidiot. [7] -- Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 12:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation or restoration should content be added to the target. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Scandal (fragrance) → Jean-Paul Gaultier  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No mention of "Scandal" at target page Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 23:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Comment - This product certainly exists and has garnered some notice. Should it be added to the target page? I'm not sure, but I'm inclined to think so. (It apparently isn't very good despite the huge price point, alas, but such is fashion). CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 04:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Colonization of the Sun → Space colonization  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This should be deleted. The Sun cannot be colonized. No serious plans have ever been made to colonize the Sun. Spacemo80 ( talk) 16:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. This is completely ridiculous. No need to keep this joke around. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment - While the sun obviously isn't going to be colonized in the real, scientific sense, does the fact that some religious traditions believe that the sun is, has been, or will be colonized in the spiritual sense and inhabited by souls (such as in Mormon cosmology) matter here? What about outright fiction that involves characters living on or in the sun, such as All-Star Superman? My instinct is for this to just be deleted as nonsense, but "colonization of the sun" as a concept technically includes both fiction and.... (trying to be charitable) fiction-ish mythology. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 20:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per precedent for Neutron star colonization and 12 others at a 2007 RfD. It leads me to question Yellow dwarf colonization, the only redirect not deleted in the RfD. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. It's a bit hot. Narky Blert ( talk) 10:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete WP:SNOW. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 12:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Brahm (redirects) → Brahm  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Katie Bell (redirects) → Katie Bell  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• CR7 (redirects) → CR7  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Zindagi/redirects → Zindagi  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Keith Ferguson/redirects → Keith Ferguson  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Eighth Avenue (redirects) → Eighth Avenue  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Haunt/redirects → Haunt  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• With/redirects → With  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Spygate (redirects) → Spygate  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Corvette (disambiguation) (redirect) → Corvette (disambiguation)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Fall (disambiguation)(redirect) → Fall (disambiguation)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Some more redirects that were left over to make space for page moves, this time to disambiguation pages. Not sure why we should keep these lying around... Regards, SONIC 678 16:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Housekeeping. This is not the way to move stuff around during a multipage move, especially if you leave a mess behind. Narky Blert ( talk) 18:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete all per nom, and because I don't see any edit history in these redirects worth retaining due to them seeming to never be full-blown articles/dabs. (In other words, I don't see a need to "Move without leaving a redirect" these redirects since there seems to be nothing to retain in them per WP:A/ WP:CWW.) Steel1943 ( talk) 18:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment, these redirects are obviously fairly useless but I don't see the point in nominating them for deletion? —  J947 ^[cont] 20:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Similar concept as redirects with "upcoming/untitled" in their titles: It doesn't explain or describe their target. For example, a human being is a human being, not a redirect. Otherwise, we are all redirect beings, I guess. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete all - These are all useless and shouldn't be kept. I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 23:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment: Also adding two (disambiguation) (redirects) to the discussion. Working on it... Regards, SONIC 678 23:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  ...done. Regards, SONIC 678 23:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Comment. These were all (except the last two that were just added) created by Anthony Appleyard a few years ago during what I believe were WP:HISTMERGEs. I'm not sure what the mechanics of histmerges entail, but I'm assuming they were created for a reason at the time. Whether they can now be safely deleted or not, I'm not sure. Station1 ( talk) 22:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete last two as creator. The last two were special redirects I made for page traffic tracking purposes during RMs. They have served their purpose and can go away. Dohn joe ( talk) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• GM S platform → Toyota Corolla  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

GM does not make Toyota Tsla1337 ( talk) 16:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• This designation was used for the Chevrolet Nova and Geo Prizm models built at the NUMMI plant alongside Corallas. Unless someone identifies a better target, the current one is as good as any. - Eureka Lott 19:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• As per Eureka Lott, can't think of anywhere else this should link.  Mr.choppers |  ✎  02:36, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• The Nova and Prizm were produced by a Toyota and GM joint venture, based on a Toyota design and badged as GM products. It's most natural redirect is to Toyota Corolla.  Stepho   talk  23:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep - This redirect seems appropriate given the production links stated above. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 05:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep Thank you for explaining why it exists i choose to keep it Tsla1337 ( talk) 11:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete unless explained somewhere. This is a good example of the confusion that arises when someone gets redirected somewhere that does not mention the term. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 16:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • My concern has been resolved. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 11:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• A redirect to List of GM platforms would be better, as it's mentioned there. Peter James ( talk) 21:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  The various GM branded versions are also listed at Toyota Corolla#Alternative versions. Perhaps we should tweak the redirect to go directly to that section instead of the top of the article. I have just made the various GM branded versions bold and have also added bold 'GM S Platform', to make it more obvious for those following the redirect.  Stepho   talk  10:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• I can support that proposal, @ Stepho-wrs, though I think you went a bit overboard with the bolding—see MOS:BOLD. - Eureka Lott 00:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Yeah, I was a bit overzealous making all the GM products bold. Feel free to pull some of them back.  Stepho   talk  10:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Comment - Refining things to go specifically to ' Toyota_Corolla#Alternative_versions' makes sense to me as well. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 14:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Kyonko → Haruhi Suzumiya  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This is a fanmade character that is not mentioned in Wikipedia. — Xezbeth ( talk) 15:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. A WP search turned up this redirect and no other mention. Narky Blert ( talk) 18:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - This isn't appropriate. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 11:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Rigi's arresting operation → Arrest of Abdolmalek Rigi  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Nonsensical phrasing that has no chance of being naturally typed. Brycehughes ( talk) 14:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Weird ambiguous grammar with several meanings, none of them obviously related to the target. Narky Blert ( talk) 18:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - The odd way in which this is worded makes the redirect not worth keeping, as stated above. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 20:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Just an artifact from moving the page. Discuss-Dubious ( t/ c) 03:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep per K4 and RHARMFUL; there are a fair few old links that are useless to break. —  J947 ^[cont] 05:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. It was at this title for 10 hours. — Xezbeth ( talk) 21:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete due to a WP:TRAINWRECK. Redirects referring to the Republic of China or Taiwan will be retargeted to Elections in Taiwan, the rest kept as-is. This is without prejudice against speedy renomination in smaller, like-minded groups. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 20:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Democracy in the Pr of C → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the PR of c → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the PR of C → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Pr of c → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Pr of c → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in pr of c → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in pr of C → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in PR of C → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Zhong guo → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Zhong Guo → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in ZhongGuo → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Zhongguo → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in zhongguo → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China (mainland) → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Mainland China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in mainland China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in (The People's Republic of) China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the PROC → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the PRoC → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Proc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the proc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the prc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in proc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in prc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Proc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in PROC → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in PRoC → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China P.R → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China P.R. → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China PR. → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China, PR. → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China, P.R. → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China, P.R → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China, Pr → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China, PR → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in China PR → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Chaina → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy In Chaina → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy In CHINA → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in CHINA → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples Republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Peoples Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples Republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples rRpublic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in peoples republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's Republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in people's republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in People's republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in People's republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in People's republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in People's republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in People's Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in People's Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's Republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the people's Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the peoples Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the peoples Republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the peoples Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the peoples Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the peoples republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the peoples republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Peoples republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Peoples Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Peoples Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Peoples Republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Peoples republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Peoples republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the People's republic Of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the People's republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the People's republic of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the People's republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the People's Republic Of China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the People's Republic of china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in Prc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the Prc → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in the PRC → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in PRC → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Voting In china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Voting In China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy In China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy In china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Democracy in china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Voting in Taiwan → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Voting in taiwan → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Voting in china → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Voting in China → Democracy in China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

There's 128 of these pointless redirects created within 61 minutes! DELETE. Cabayi ( talk) 12:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Nuke all from orbit - Most of these are totally useless. A few are possibly okay, but creating 128 redirects in an hour is disruptive WP:FAITACCOMPLI editing. Blow it up and start again. The OK ones can be recreated by another editor if necessary. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 12:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Kill them all with fire. No prejudice against recreation of a few of the more sensible ones, but having redirects relating either to the PRC or to the ROC to the identical target is ridiculous. WP:TRAINWRECK does not apply to this nomination. Narky Blert ( talk) 13:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• The "Republic of China" and "Taiwan" redirects are misleading and should be retargeted or deleted - there's an article Elections in Taiwan. Capitalisation errors (such as Democracy in peoples Republic of china) should also be deleted as unnecessary. Peter James ( talk) 14:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Honey, get the shotgun. Redirecting Taiwan related searches to a page about China feels disruptive rather than simply ignorant, maybe we have a larger issue with this editor. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 14:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete most of them per SpicyMilkBoy (and possibly keep those that are OK), and if any "Taiwan" or "Republic of China" ones are recreated redirect them to Elections in Taiwan, where Democracy in Taiwan redirects. Regards, SONIC 678 16:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep most without prejudice to renominating the most ridiculous ones, some of these are ridiculous but a lot are plausible search terms, like Democracy in People's Republic of China. Apart from the Voting ones, what is to be gained by deleting these redirects? Retarget the Taiwanese ones (and ROC) to Elections in Taiwan; I'd advocate a few other retargets too. For now, most of these redirects are useless to make but more harmful to delete. TRAINWRECK applies in full force here. —  J947 ^[cont] 22:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I support this comment. Mopswade ( talk) 01:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• A more comprehensive comment from the creator: despite the large quantity of redirect pages, all of these are technically legitimate redirects, and can be referenced from the redirects to China, with a few capitalization changes. Although I concede that most the redirect pages will not be visited frequently, to varying degrees, they can still be useful for browsing, especially for users who directly type their intended search term into the address bar, for which varying capitalizations can make their life easier. As far as we know, we can't comment on the utility of many of the redirects, however I was under the impression that redirects should not be candidates for deletion just because they are unused, or "pointless" in other words ( WP:RFD#DELETE). Content regarding Taiwan is decently covered in this article, but I am happy to do the retargeting to Elections in Taiwan or any other page deemed more suitable. Tis my pleasure to do other "cleaning up", as our dear nominator calls it. Mopswade ( talk) 02:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  Taiwan is not decently covered at Democracy in China, the section "Taiwan, 1945–present” is completely unsourced. I see that editors have tried to remove it as an unsourced section and you have reverted them. Per WP:BURDEN please don’t do that again without making sure every single line you restore gets sourced. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 15:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  This comment is incorrect to a degree, do raise this up on the talk page of the article.

  Redirects do create additional work, as a vandal could redirect the article and a bot updates the redirects, or with a topic such as this, a user could restructure coverage of topics, and then the redirects point to the wrong article. Sometimes they are not noticed and stay pointing to the wrong place for years. Some may be useful (all or no first letters of words capitalised) but others (first letter of "of" capitalised, but not first letter of "China") are unlikely to be. Peter James ( talk) 21:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Separate out - As stated above, these vary dramatically in terms of plausibility and general helpfulness. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 05:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Trainwreck, close and relist separately, we should never be attempting to delete this many redirects in one discussion, it's a nightmare to close for admins and practically begging for mistakes. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Procedural dumpster fire -- close as keep for now. There should be no prejudice to future discussion in smaller groups, and this discussion's closure should not be taken as a comment on the merits of the redirects (most of which should probably be deleted). Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 19:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as housekeeping. I merged the history onto Muslim, which makes the move Anthony Appleyard was trying to make in effect a page swap. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 23:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Muslims (version 2) → Muslims  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Anthony Appleyard created this redirect when making way for another move. Useless title. Anarchyte ( talk • work) 08:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Useless. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 09:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per the nominator. This probably qualifies as housekeeping. Glades12 ( talk) 16:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Move without leaving a redirect to a title like Muslims (people) to preserve the edit history since this redirect is a {{ R with history}}. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep the history as from 2001. —  J947 ^[cont] 22:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Cabayi ( talk) 13:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Bitch fuck → Gangsta rap  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not a plausible search term for gangsta rap, or anything else. Suggest deleting. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 08:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. WP is not Urban Dictionary (which does not in fact include this exact term). Narky Blert ( talk) 13:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Not a plausible search term. If Urban Dictionary doesn't even have an entry for something, that's a pretty good indication someone made it up on the spot. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. They aren't the same thing. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Cabayi ( talk) 13:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Dirty pussy → Sexually transmitted infection  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not encyclopedic and vague, could refer to various things to do with personal hygiene. Suggest deleting. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 08:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Agreed per nom. - The9Man ^{( Talk)} 12:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom, too vague/ambiguous. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 18:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above, useless. Crossroads ^-talk- 04:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• The Confesssion (1964 film) → Quick, Let's Get Married  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

A redirect from an alternative title with an implausible missspelling. In 2019, it accumulated a grand total of 4 views compared with 772 for the correct spelling, The Confession (1964 film). Delete. Narky Blert ( talk) 07:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Agreed. This isn't worth keeping at all. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 08:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Weak delete. While I can see someone mistakenly typing in an extra S, the correctly spelled version will appear in the search bar in most cases. Regards, SONIC 678 15:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Poltergust 4000 → Mario Kart DS  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

An individual kart from the game that is not mentioned in the target article. Also ambiguous, as it re-appears in Mario Kart Tour. –  numbermaniac 06:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Not only is this ambiguous, but Wikipedia isn't in the business of collecting video game trivia anyways. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 17:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Cabayi ( talk) 13:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Covidivorce → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

See the RfDs of Generation coronababy, Coronnials, Coronnial, Coronapocalypse, COVIDemic, Condemic, Covidiot, etc. Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 05:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Strong delete. Who the hell keeps making these? — Tenryuu 🐲 (  💬 •  📝 ) 06:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Could be Twitter users. I remember #COVIDIOTS trending on Twitter in Australia a while ago, so I wouldn't be surprised if the other portmanteaus also originated from social media somewhere. –  numbermaniac 06:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete as WP:NEOLOGISM with extreme prejudice. Narky Blert ( talk) 07:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, not mentioned in the target. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 18:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, we don't need a redirect for every neologism. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Not an actual term in regular usage. Just another random thing made up one day. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 14:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Steve Howe (basseball player) → Steve Howe (baseball)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Back in 2005, this page was moved to the correct spelling (which later ended up at the current title), compared to the correctly spelled counterpart and the target it got very few pageviews in 2019 (especially the target). Regards, SONIC 678 05:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Until I saw the target, I was unsure whether he played baseball or basketball. Narky Blert ( talk) 06:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - I see no reason to keep this. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 07:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Dirty Cash (ong) → Dirty Cash (Money Talks)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not sure this redirect is needed anymore (a leftover of a move to the correctly spelled title six years ago, which was redirected here later), since Ong has a lot of different meanings. Regards, SONIC 678 05:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Implausible misspelling; I presume an ong in this case is what an inger ings. Narky Blert ( talk) 07:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - I see no good reason to keep this. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 23:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Capitalism (human) → Capitalism  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

What does human mean here? TheAwesome Hwyh 03:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. This isn't even {{ R from unnecessary disambiguation}}, unless someone can provide evidence that non-human lifeforms engage in this (or indeed any other) political and economic model. Narky Blert ( talk) 06:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - This seems pointless. I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 07:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete (human). This doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense, or serve any real purpose. I agree with the two comments above me. Thegreatluigi ( talk) 14:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep. I think this has been made to make way for the other side of the coin "Capitalism (animals)", which points to the animal industrial complex, the non-human analogue of capitalism. The confusion will be solved if we create a redirect "Capitalism (animals)" and "Capitalism (non-human)" for the article on AIC. Rasnaboy ( talk) 15:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep. We need to create "Capitalism (animals)" as a redirect to the AIC article. While capitalism involves exploitation of humans, AIC involves exploitation of animals. Bhagya sri113 ( talk) 13:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete we can link AIC in capitalism’s see also section. Not a lot of people think in terms of “animal capitalism” or “non-human capitalism” for it to be a particularly necessary redirect. Finding sources that link AIC to capitalism would be more useful for discussion of this idea pn WP, if that’s what is wanted. People who disagree should look into how widely strings related to “human capitalism” (wouldn’t that be trafficking?) vs. strings related to “non-human capitalism” appear on Google Trends, as well as how many Reliable Sources ( as Wikipedia defines the issue) speak about this distinction. Discuss-Dubious ( t/ c) 04:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete This animal-industrial complex is not "the non-human analogue of capitalism", that would have to be a capitalist animal society, which obviously doesn't exist. Neither does "capitalism" mean "exploitation". The Animal industrial complex can exist just as well in a non-capitalist society.— Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 20:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to A Fish Out of Water (book) and swap title with A Fish out of Water (book). (non-admin closure) feminist #WearAMask 😷 04:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• A Fish Out of Water (book) → Fish out of water  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Propose retarget to A Fish out of Water (book), as that is what this seems to refer to. TheAwesome Hwyh 03:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to A Fish out of Water (book) per nom, which seems to be the best course of action. Regards, SONIC 678 04:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per above; then WP:ROBIN swap the two pages per MOS:TITLECAPS: "When using title case, the following words should be capitalized: [...] The first word in a compound preposition (e.g. Time Out of Mind). Narky Blert ( talk) 06:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget - I agree with the above users. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 07:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.