←
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stepho-wrs. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
What on Earth are "biskut kacang hubcaps" ? 2001:E68:5432:E2EC:986D:D67F:709A:B1B ( talk) 16:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
I have noticed a string of highly problematic edits by user Carmaker1: [1]. As with Volvo V70, Nissan Murano, Audi 100 and Honda Odyssey (North America), he inserts the names of car designers based on missing, misleading or spurious references. In the Volvo V70 article, he inserted the name of a dubious designer into an article in such a way as to leave a direct and referenced quote by the actual designer attributed to his newly introduced spurious designer. And from what I can tell, he's pretty much blazing a trail through lots and lots of articles. His responses are... well... not helpful, to say the least. I notice that you ran into some similar issues with him recently. Is this something you could help with? 842U ( talk)
You reverted my change of "nearly all English speaking nations except the USA and the Philippines" to "nearly all English speaking nations but not the USA and the Philippines". In the first version the "nearly" implies that there are additional exceptions beyond the USA and Philippines. The second version implies that USA and Philippines are exceptions that make it "nearly all" rather than "all"; they might be the only exceptions or there might be additional ones. I am not sure that the first version has the meaning intended (What would be the additional exceptions?), so the second version is safer. I don't think that the second version is any less grammatical or harder to understand, so I am surprised that you saw fit to revert! Will you reconsider? It's a small point, I realise!
If the text had been "all countries except the USA and Philippines", there would not be an issue to discuss: it is the "nearly" that makes the difference. JMCHutchinson ( talk) 07:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for additions and alterations, and suggestions. Do you think the article is ready for submitting to publication? - NealeWellington ( talk) 04:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
MuhammadOkky1234 is adding nationalities to multiple articles, not just automobile makes. And doing so repeatedly after being warned to stop. DarkAudit ( talk) 04:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I had multiple tabs open trying to sort out that preceding edit, and I must've clicked "edit" on an older revision instead of the current one. -- Sable232 ( talk) 00:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Where did you come up with number 25 if the number is not copied from FIA rules from 1969, and that was for Group 4 cars.
Group 1 : series-preduction touring cars (5,000) Group 2 : touring cars (1,000) Group 3: grand touring cars (500) Group 4 : sports cars (25)
In 1971 that changed:
Group 1 : series-production touring cars (5,000) Group 2: touring cars (1,000) Group 3: series-production grand touring cars (1,000) Group 4: grand touring cars (400) Group 5: special production cars deriving from Groups 1 to 4
In 1981 that also changed:
Group 1 : series-production touring cars (5,000) Group 2: touring cars (1,000) Group 3: series-production grand touring cars (1,000) Group 4: grand touring cars (400) Group 5: special production cars deriving from Groups 1 to 4
That 25 is obsolete number, production number should be at least 400 for example 500 Bugatti Chirons were produced, not including other variants like Chiron Sport, Chiron Super Sport, Chiron Noire, Chiron Pur Sport, Chiron Profilée, etc.). 141.138.24.111 ( talk) 00:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't know how to do it. Also, I don't know what should the number be? From FIA, 400 cars produced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.138.24.111 ( talk) 07:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The "dispute" is one between just two editors who are obsessed by the topic, NRS and TCG (who has been banned but pops back up repeatedly as an IP). NRS is on the edge of a block (see their talk page). Compromise and proportion are alien concepts. My advice is not to get involved: I did and regretted it, but not any more. The RFC closed in January should have put an end to further discussion and I should have seen it lot earlier. -- 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 17:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Way to go, kiddo! Gonna slap a warning on my talk page for reverting your edit? You reverted my edit, quoting WP:BRD. So where is the "D" part of that claim you make? You know, that bit that spells it out: "Discuss your bold edit with the person who reverted you. To follow BRD specifically, instead of one of the many alternatives, you must not restore your bold edit, make a different edit to this part of the page, engage in back-and-forth reverting, or start any of the larger dispute resolution processes. Talk to that one person until the two of you have reached an agreement." But you win... Close, but co Cigar! I can't be bothered to argue with experienced editors who should know better. There's too much vandalism around this joint that needs more immediate attention for me to waste my time. BTW, it may have slipped your attention, but my revert was a good faith revert. Gone with the wind... -- Technopat ( talk) 11:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Yep, they are socks. FYI, that's WP:LTA/LB2 - they've been targeting Toyota Supra (J29/DB) lately. Thankfully ScottishFinnishRadish protected that page. -- Prodraxis talk contribs 13:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Stepho - I am not entirely clear on Toyota's earliest history, but wasn't their first car sold as the Toyoda AA? Did they change the name and badging in August 1937? Not necessarily saying Toyota AA should be renamed, but I imagine the first prototype should be Toyoda A1 and Toyoda AA should at least receive mention. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
September 14-16: Exhibition held commemorating the completion of Japan-made Toyoda cars for the general public. Model AA, AB phaeton, GA truck, and other vehicles announced (Tokyo Prefecture Commercial and Industrial Promotion Hall). Then, in August and September 1937
Toyota Motor Co., Ltd established - Risaburo Toyoda and Kiichiro Toyoda appointed company president and vice president, respectively, [and on] September 29 Toyoda Automatic Loom Works' automotive manufacturing operations handed over to Toyota Motor Co., Ltd.. Mr.choppers | ✎ 12:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Stepho-wrs, I recently added a chunk of information on the toyota starlet page under P90 section, a lot of it regarding the UK models. This information was gathered by a few of us collectively due to our interest in the subject, and has taken us a long time to gather this information for ourselves. I thought I would be a good idea to share that information, particularly with how little information about the SR model we have here in the UK.
I am new to editing wiki pages, and you said in your reason for the bulk revert was there were no reliable sources to back this up. Our information was gathered through many dealer brochures and accessories brochures, information from toyota's own website (history of the toyota starlet), UK vehicle registry information, and TTE's website that can be accessed via the way back machine archive. All of this information I can provide via links & image's, however, being new I don't know how to do this.
If you could please let me know how I can go about proving these reliable sources to have this information restored, I would appreciate it. Thank you Trevstar34 ( talk) 16:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This is a reminder of why I just took a 3 year break editing. Nyth 63 01:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Perhaps it is a bit archaic in vernacular use: I used it because it is the absolute generic name for the fuel which is used in government documentation. For example this report on gov.uk, which includes the line
Total petrol excise duty receipts which are calculated by summing together excise duty receipts from several different motor spirits, over 95% of which is unleaded petrol.
It does use "petrol" as well. "Motor spirit" is used to distinguish petrol manufactured for use in land vehicles from that used in aero engines ("aviation spirit"), which are both called "petrol" in vernacular parlance but for tax reasons are considered very different products, hence HM Revenue & Customs' continued use. 𝔖𝔱𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔱𝔷 ( talk) 13:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
I changed the 3.4 to a 3.5 due to the V35A engine nomenclature. 3.5 (3445cc) is correct, but look at the engine code nomenclature, if you write 3.4 it means the correct engine code is V34A. FelixGinting ( talk) 07:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Stepho-wrs,
I see that you reverted an edit I made on the Tesla Inc. article and wanted to ask you about it. I changed "2019-present" to "Since 2019" and you commented in the reversion that MOS:TOPRESENT is for textual paragraphs, not applicable for infoboxes. . ."
The tables and infoboxes language in the MOS says that "pres." can be used when space is limited (with the example "1982-pres."). But the essence of MOS:TOPRESENT is to remove ambiguity. That plus MOS:DATED combined essentially say that terms like now, currently, present, etc. should not be used unless they also include a reference to the time it was written. The part about infoblocks and tables seems to be an exception when space is limited (probably because there isn't room to include additional wording for when). I do not see anything that specifically ties MOS:TOPRESENT to only textual paragraphs and do not see anything about headings.
I don't agree with your reversion unless there is more that you can provide in reference. Please let me know your thoughts on this as I see a lot of "-present" out there .
Thanks,
Edward Bednar ( talk) 22:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
I have seen your reverted edit on Automated lane keeping systems/Automated Lane Keeping Systems due to assumed vague (and unverifiable[sic]) references.
I agree, this means that it would be possible to add URLs and more details.
Please, find hereunder few pieces of information to help you in that sense:
Section | Concept | Limitation | Verifiability / Proposed URL to search | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduction | ALKS as (the/a) first step toward Automated Driving Systems (ADS) | I may agree the sentence might be limited to a UNECE/European view/context and may not need to be in the Lead | As such sentence is suggested by both Dutch and British authorities, might be googled with site:gov.uk and site:rdl.nl. Might be site:sec.gov would have some sentence on the "first binding international regulation on “Level 3” vehicle automation". | |
History | Mercedes is the first car manufacturer to implement such system in Germany, Europe. | Pure verifiable fact, without any kind of ambiguity | Let's search for level 3, Germany, Mercedes. | |
History | The company aims to target American ... market | Pure verifiable fact, without any kind of ambiguity | Let's search for level 3, Nevada, (or California), Mercedes. | |
History | The company aims to target (...) Chinese markets. | Might need additional verification | ||
Regulation | the US, the UK and Japan are considering ALKS legalization | Don't know neither if legalization is the right word nor if it matches the US case, as the US may work differently than Europe, Japan and Korea | For the UK, information may be available on Internet
| |
Regulation | US Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and Audi warn of liability concerns | May it be an open question? | Does this require a link toward Self-driving car liability? |
77.193.104.36 ( talk) 13:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
I've saw on YouTube that Toyota Crown was imported to the Philippines Do you think that price is Php 5.6 mil, a Flagship VIP Sedan 64.226.63.144 ( talk) 06:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Category:Toyota dealerships has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Australia topicon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 19:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
It's officially release 110.54.158.233 ( talk) 03:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Why did you delete all my revisions? Kyeniy ( talk) 22:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Randolph WAS purchased by William Durant in 1909. He sold it back to the original owners in 1911.
Yellow Cab was bought by GM in 1925
Yellow Coach was purchased by GM in 1923.
Both Yellow companies were part of the GM Coach Division (GMC) Kyeniy ( talk) 22:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Stepho-wrs! Are you still willing to make the change to {{ currency}} with regards to CAD like discussed at Template talk:Currency § Canadian dollar doesn't match 4217 style so that it matches {{ CAD}}? Cheers, microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 18:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Stepho-wrs, I have started a discussion at AN/I regarding Antares600's disruptive editing. The thread is here if you have any input. -- Sable232 ( talk) 23:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
I find that there's a lot of confusion in the non-enthusiast public about how to define a "higher" vs "lower" gear, because it's customary to refer to first or second gear as "low" gear, while fourth or fifth is "high" gear; however, a "low" gear in this context has a higher numeric ratio and a higher engine RPM at a given speed. This causes a muddle when trying to decide whether to say that a gear ratio was "raised" or "lowered". I don't know about where you live, but it's common for enthusiasts in the U.S. to refer to a higher numeric gear ratio as a "shorter" gear and a lower numeric ratio as a "taller" or "longer" gear to make communications clear; however, I think this qualifies as WP:JARGON that would make little sense to the uninitiated, and I'm not sure it's universal throughout the English-speaking world either. Carguychris ( talk) 15:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi Stepho; I was dismayed to see that your page is down. Banpei's mirror is missing a number of things, including the Celica brochures. I was looking to see which colors Toyota used on the 1979 Celica in Australia - perhaps you can help, or perhaps even send the brochure scans to Banpei so that they could update? Thanks, Mr.choppers | ✎ 22:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Looks like User:Left guide has it in for you - not only are they gutting all Toyota articles you worked upon, but they also did a bunch of edits to Wayne Stephenson - ha. They have over 10,000 edits in four months, most of them utterly meaningless. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Holden Commodore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The problem with adding {{clear}} is that it makes articles look messy and amateurish rather than professional and encyclopaedic. Which, to my mind, is far more important than matching up endless images with text. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 09:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 12:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm somewhat new to wikipedia so if my sources didn't go through, I have links here.
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNCXJ1RAcWw
Best Motoring lists the height as 1240mm at 0:41
Contemporary US Toyota brochures also listed the height as 48.8in. [3] http://importarchive.com/brochure/toyotamr21991_01
I did have to buy access to that scan via a small $2 donation, just so you know.
The reason for the lowered height for 93+ model year cars was that Toyota lowered the car during the Rev2 suspension geometry changes. [4] https://markdormangarage.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/mr2-sw20-technical-information/ Midship Runabout ( talk) 15:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
<ref>...</ref>
tags and {{
cite web}}
. See examples inside the MR2 article. References in edit summaries in 2024 will be practically impossible to see in 2030, which is why we put them inline in the text.The last body style will be released on June 6 in USA and 7 in Japan 49.145.227.209 ( talk) 20:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
←
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stepho-wrs. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
What on Earth are "biskut kacang hubcaps" ? 2001:E68:5432:E2EC:986D:D67F:709A:B1B ( talk) 16:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
I have noticed a string of highly problematic edits by user Carmaker1: [1]. As with Volvo V70, Nissan Murano, Audi 100 and Honda Odyssey (North America), he inserts the names of car designers based on missing, misleading or spurious references. In the Volvo V70 article, he inserted the name of a dubious designer into an article in such a way as to leave a direct and referenced quote by the actual designer attributed to his newly introduced spurious designer. And from what I can tell, he's pretty much blazing a trail through lots and lots of articles. His responses are... well... not helpful, to say the least. I notice that you ran into some similar issues with him recently. Is this something you could help with? 842U ( talk)
You reverted my change of "nearly all English speaking nations except the USA and the Philippines" to "nearly all English speaking nations but not the USA and the Philippines". In the first version the "nearly" implies that there are additional exceptions beyond the USA and Philippines. The second version implies that USA and Philippines are exceptions that make it "nearly all" rather than "all"; they might be the only exceptions or there might be additional ones. I am not sure that the first version has the meaning intended (What would be the additional exceptions?), so the second version is safer. I don't think that the second version is any less grammatical or harder to understand, so I am surprised that you saw fit to revert! Will you reconsider? It's a small point, I realise!
If the text had been "all countries except the USA and Philippines", there would not be an issue to discuss: it is the "nearly" that makes the difference. JMCHutchinson ( talk) 07:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for additions and alterations, and suggestions. Do you think the article is ready for submitting to publication? - NealeWellington ( talk) 04:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
MuhammadOkky1234 is adding nationalities to multiple articles, not just automobile makes. And doing so repeatedly after being warned to stop. DarkAudit ( talk) 04:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I had multiple tabs open trying to sort out that preceding edit, and I must've clicked "edit" on an older revision instead of the current one. -- Sable232 ( talk) 00:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Where did you come up with number 25 if the number is not copied from FIA rules from 1969, and that was for Group 4 cars.
Group 1 : series-preduction touring cars (5,000) Group 2 : touring cars (1,000) Group 3: grand touring cars (500) Group 4 : sports cars (25)
In 1971 that changed:
Group 1 : series-production touring cars (5,000) Group 2: touring cars (1,000) Group 3: series-production grand touring cars (1,000) Group 4: grand touring cars (400) Group 5: special production cars deriving from Groups 1 to 4
In 1981 that also changed:
Group 1 : series-production touring cars (5,000) Group 2: touring cars (1,000) Group 3: series-production grand touring cars (1,000) Group 4: grand touring cars (400) Group 5: special production cars deriving from Groups 1 to 4
That 25 is obsolete number, production number should be at least 400 for example 500 Bugatti Chirons were produced, not including other variants like Chiron Sport, Chiron Super Sport, Chiron Noire, Chiron Pur Sport, Chiron Profilée, etc.). 141.138.24.111 ( talk) 00:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't know how to do it. Also, I don't know what should the number be? From FIA, 400 cars produced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.138.24.111 ( talk) 07:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The "dispute" is one between just two editors who are obsessed by the topic, NRS and TCG (who has been banned but pops back up repeatedly as an IP). NRS is on the edge of a block (see their talk page). Compromise and proportion are alien concepts. My advice is not to get involved: I did and regretted it, but not any more. The RFC closed in January should have put an end to further discussion and I should have seen it lot earlier. -- 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 17:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Way to go, kiddo! Gonna slap a warning on my talk page for reverting your edit? You reverted my edit, quoting WP:BRD. So where is the "D" part of that claim you make? You know, that bit that spells it out: "Discuss your bold edit with the person who reverted you. To follow BRD specifically, instead of one of the many alternatives, you must not restore your bold edit, make a different edit to this part of the page, engage in back-and-forth reverting, or start any of the larger dispute resolution processes. Talk to that one person until the two of you have reached an agreement." But you win... Close, but co Cigar! I can't be bothered to argue with experienced editors who should know better. There's too much vandalism around this joint that needs more immediate attention for me to waste my time. BTW, it may have slipped your attention, but my revert was a good faith revert. Gone with the wind... -- Technopat ( talk) 11:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Yep, they are socks. FYI, that's WP:LTA/LB2 - they've been targeting Toyota Supra (J29/DB) lately. Thankfully ScottishFinnishRadish protected that page. -- Prodraxis talk contribs 13:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Stepho - I am not entirely clear on Toyota's earliest history, but wasn't their first car sold as the Toyoda AA? Did they change the name and badging in August 1937? Not necessarily saying Toyota AA should be renamed, but I imagine the first prototype should be Toyoda A1 and Toyoda AA should at least receive mention. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
September 14-16: Exhibition held commemorating the completion of Japan-made Toyoda cars for the general public. Model AA, AB phaeton, GA truck, and other vehicles announced (Tokyo Prefecture Commercial and Industrial Promotion Hall). Then, in August and September 1937
Toyota Motor Co., Ltd established - Risaburo Toyoda and Kiichiro Toyoda appointed company president and vice president, respectively, [and on] September 29 Toyoda Automatic Loom Works' automotive manufacturing operations handed over to Toyota Motor Co., Ltd.. Mr.choppers | ✎ 12:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Stepho-wrs, I recently added a chunk of information on the toyota starlet page under P90 section, a lot of it regarding the UK models. This information was gathered by a few of us collectively due to our interest in the subject, and has taken us a long time to gather this information for ourselves. I thought I would be a good idea to share that information, particularly with how little information about the SR model we have here in the UK.
I am new to editing wiki pages, and you said in your reason for the bulk revert was there were no reliable sources to back this up. Our information was gathered through many dealer brochures and accessories brochures, information from toyota's own website (history of the toyota starlet), UK vehicle registry information, and TTE's website that can be accessed via the way back machine archive. All of this information I can provide via links & image's, however, being new I don't know how to do this.
If you could please let me know how I can go about proving these reliable sources to have this information restored, I would appreciate it. Thank you Trevstar34 ( talk) 16:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
This is a reminder of why I just took a 3 year break editing. Nyth 63 01:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Perhaps it is a bit archaic in vernacular use: I used it because it is the absolute generic name for the fuel which is used in government documentation. For example this report on gov.uk, which includes the line
Total petrol excise duty receipts which are calculated by summing together excise duty receipts from several different motor spirits, over 95% of which is unleaded petrol.
It does use "petrol" as well. "Motor spirit" is used to distinguish petrol manufactured for use in land vehicles from that used in aero engines ("aviation spirit"), which are both called "petrol" in vernacular parlance but for tax reasons are considered very different products, hence HM Revenue & Customs' continued use. 𝔖𝔱𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔱𝔷 ( talk) 13:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
I changed the 3.4 to a 3.5 due to the V35A engine nomenclature. 3.5 (3445cc) is correct, but look at the engine code nomenclature, if you write 3.4 it means the correct engine code is V34A. FelixGinting ( talk) 07:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Stepho-wrs,
I see that you reverted an edit I made on the Tesla Inc. article and wanted to ask you about it. I changed "2019-present" to "Since 2019" and you commented in the reversion that MOS:TOPRESENT is for textual paragraphs, not applicable for infoboxes. . ."
The tables and infoboxes language in the MOS says that "pres." can be used when space is limited (with the example "1982-pres."). But the essence of MOS:TOPRESENT is to remove ambiguity. That plus MOS:DATED combined essentially say that terms like now, currently, present, etc. should not be used unless they also include a reference to the time it was written. The part about infoblocks and tables seems to be an exception when space is limited (probably because there isn't room to include additional wording for when). I do not see anything that specifically ties MOS:TOPRESENT to only textual paragraphs and do not see anything about headings.
I don't agree with your reversion unless there is more that you can provide in reference. Please let me know your thoughts on this as I see a lot of "-present" out there .
Thanks,
Edward Bednar ( talk) 22:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
I have seen your reverted edit on Automated lane keeping systems/Automated Lane Keeping Systems due to assumed vague (and unverifiable[sic]) references.
I agree, this means that it would be possible to add URLs and more details.
Please, find hereunder few pieces of information to help you in that sense:
Section | Concept | Limitation | Verifiability / Proposed URL to search | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduction | ALKS as (the/a) first step toward Automated Driving Systems (ADS) | I may agree the sentence might be limited to a UNECE/European view/context and may not need to be in the Lead | As such sentence is suggested by both Dutch and British authorities, might be googled with site:gov.uk and site:rdl.nl. Might be site:sec.gov would have some sentence on the "first binding international regulation on “Level 3” vehicle automation". | |
History | Mercedes is the first car manufacturer to implement such system in Germany, Europe. | Pure verifiable fact, without any kind of ambiguity | Let's search for level 3, Germany, Mercedes. | |
History | The company aims to target American ... market | Pure verifiable fact, without any kind of ambiguity | Let's search for level 3, Nevada, (or California), Mercedes. | |
History | The company aims to target (...) Chinese markets. | Might need additional verification | ||
Regulation | the US, the UK and Japan are considering ALKS legalization | Don't know neither if legalization is the right word nor if it matches the US case, as the US may work differently than Europe, Japan and Korea | For the UK, information may be available on Internet
| |
Regulation | US Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and Audi warn of liability concerns | May it be an open question? | Does this require a link toward Self-driving car liability? |
77.193.104.36 ( talk) 13:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
I've saw on YouTube that Toyota Crown was imported to the Philippines Do you think that price is Php 5.6 mil, a Flagship VIP Sedan 64.226.63.144 ( talk) 06:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Category:Toyota dealerships has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Australia topicon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 19:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
It's officially release 110.54.158.233 ( talk) 03:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Why did you delete all my revisions? Kyeniy ( talk) 22:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Randolph WAS purchased by William Durant in 1909. He sold it back to the original owners in 1911.
Yellow Cab was bought by GM in 1925
Yellow Coach was purchased by GM in 1923.
Both Yellow companies were part of the GM Coach Division (GMC) Kyeniy ( talk) 22:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Stepho-wrs! Are you still willing to make the change to {{ currency}} with regards to CAD like discussed at Template talk:Currency § Canadian dollar doesn't match 4217 style so that it matches {{ CAD}}? Cheers, microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 18:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Stepho-wrs, I have started a discussion at AN/I regarding Antares600's disruptive editing. The thread is here if you have any input. -- Sable232 ( talk) 23:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
I find that there's a lot of confusion in the non-enthusiast public about how to define a "higher" vs "lower" gear, because it's customary to refer to first or second gear as "low" gear, while fourth or fifth is "high" gear; however, a "low" gear in this context has a higher numeric ratio and a higher engine RPM at a given speed. This causes a muddle when trying to decide whether to say that a gear ratio was "raised" or "lowered". I don't know about where you live, but it's common for enthusiasts in the U.S. to refer to a higher numeric gear ratio as a "shorter" gear and a lower numeric ratio as a "taller" or "longer" gear to make communications clear; however, I think this qualifies as WP:JARGON that would make little sense to the uninitiated, and I'm not sure it's universal throughout the English-speaking world either. Carguychris ( talk) 15:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi Stepho; I was dismayed to see that your page is down. Banpei's mirror is missing a number of things, including the Celica brochures. I was looking to see which colors Toyota used on the 1979 Celica in Australia - perhaps you can help, or perhaps even send the brochure scans to Banpei so that they could update? Thanks, Mr.choppers | ✎ 22:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Looks like User:Left guide has it in for you - not only are they gutting all Toyota articles you worked upon, but they also did a bunch of edits to Wayne Stephenson - ha. They have over 10,000 edits in four months, most of them utterly meaningless. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Holden Commodore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The problem with adding {{clear}} is that it makes articles look messy and amateurish rather than professional and encyclopaedic. Which, to my mind, is far more important than matching up endless images with text. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 09:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 12:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm somewhat new to wikipedia so if my sources didn't go through, I have links here.
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNCXJ1RAcWw
Best Motoring lists the height as 1240mm at 0:41
Contemporary US Toyota brochures also listed the height as 48.8in. [3] http://importarchive.com/brochure/toyotamr21991_01
I did have to buy access to that scan via a small $2 donation, just so you know.
The reason for the lowered height for 93+ model year cars was that Toyota lowered the car during the Rev2 suspension geometry changes. [4] https://markdormangarage.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/mr2-sw20-technical-information/ Midship Runabout ( talk) 15:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
<ref>...</ref>
tags and {{
cite web}}
. See examples inside the MR2 article. References in edit summaries in 2024 will be practically impossible to see in 2030, which is why we put them inline in the text.The last body style will be released on June 6 in USA and 7 in Japan 49.145.227.209 ( talk) 20:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)