The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - meets both
WP:GNG and
WP:AIRCRASH, and is a valid
WP:SPINOUT from the movie article, where the current coverage of the accident, compared to that of the movie itself, may be
WP:UNDUE. Does require a retitle though. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 19:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. I agree with The Bushranger. This was a really big deal back in the 1980s, and it changed the way that films were made. The article could probably be easily expanded beyond the limits of
WP:UNDUE in the parent article. I don't much like the title, either. It sounds like it's referring to the TV series.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 20:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep passes
WP:EVENT. Three people were killed on a movie set and members of the film crew were criminally prosecuted for it. As an aviation incident, it passes because a notable person was killed- Vic Morrow. I agree with Taylor, the article should be renamed.
...William 21:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. An aviation incident that results in the death of a notable person and is the impetus for the establishment of new regulations is pretty much the definition of a notable plane/helicopter crash. There are lots and lots of references available, even beyond what's already in the article. This is, if anything, a target for expansion, not deletion. That said, the current title is wretched, but I'm not really familiar enough with the project's common practice for naming article on aircraft incidents to suggest a move target; regardless, that's an editorial process, not a matter for AFD.
Squeamish Ossifrage (
talk) 21:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - meets both
WP:GNG and
WP:AIRCRASH, and is a valid
WP:SPINOUT from the movie article, where the current coverage of the accident, compared to that of the movie itself, may be
WP:UNDUE. Does require a retitle though. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 19:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. I agree with The Bushranger. This was a really big deal back in the 1980s, and it changed the way that films were made. The article could probably be easily expanded beyond the limits of
WP:UNDUE in the parent article. I don't much like the title, either. It sounds like it's referring to the TV series.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 20:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep passes
WP:EVENT. Three people were killed on a movie set and members of the film crew were criminally prosecuted for it. As an aviation incident, it passes because a notable person was killed- Vic Morrow. I agree with Taylor, the article should be renamed.
...William 21:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. An aviation incident that results in the death of a notable person and is the impetus for the establishment of new regulations is pretty much the definition of a notable plane/helicopter crash. There are lots and lots of references available, even beyond what's already in the article. This is, if anything, a target for expansion, not deletion. That said, the current title is wretched, but I'm not really familiar enough with the project's common practice for naming article on aircraft incidents to suggest a move target; regardless, that's an editorial process, not a matter for AFD.
Squeamish Ossifrage (
talk) 21:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.