- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Peter William Armstrong ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This reads like a resumé/CV. Except for bot fixes and general housekeeping, it has not changed much in five years and the creation comment was "Asked on the new page notice board about thsi and didnt get a response so thought i'd make the page and wait for feedback.". So here is some feedback: it looks like a resumé. It's not written in encyclopaedic style, it is poorly referenced, and although he won a BAFTA so what? People win awards in all kinds of industries, it just happens to be one where you get on telly when you do. Not really notable person, by Wikipedia standards. Might be by BBC or BAFTA standards, but Wikipedia is not the BBC or BAFTA. The first two hits on Google are to this Wikipedia article, so obviously he is not notable even at the BBC or BAFTA. The slighltly high hit rate lately (to the tune of ten hits) are probably 2 mine and some others coming from the discussion of
Oneworld.net
OneWorld.net at
WP:RFD; typically gets less than five hits a month. He is mentioned as the editor of Domesday vol. 2
here at the BBC but so are loads of other non-notable people.
Si Trew (
talk)
03:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep: Appears to meet WP:ANYBIO (subject has received a BAFTA). A poorly-written article should be cleaned up, not deleted. Suggest tagging with {{ like resume}}. -- N Y Kevin 04:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, it was not just any old BAFTA but a Lifetime Achievement Award. Move to Peter Armstrong (producer) like others in Special:Search/intitle:producer – I would do it now but do not want to confuse this AfD. – Fayenatic L ondon 11:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Reads like a resume, yes. Needs moved to producer title, yes. However, it is sourced now, even though Domesday doesn't even mention him in its article here. — Wylie pedia 07:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Peter William Armstrong ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This reads like a resumé/CV. Except for bot fixes and general housekeeping, it has not changed much in five years and the creation comment was "Asked on the new page notice board about thsi and didnt get a response so thought i'd make the page and wait for feedback.". So here is some feedback: it looks like a resumé. It's not written in encyclopaedic style, it is poorly referenced, and although he won a BAFTA so what? People win awards in all kinds of industries, it just happens to be one where you get on telly when you do. Not really notable person, by Wikipedia standards. Might be by BBC or BAFTA standards, but Wikipedia is not the BBC or BAFTA. The first two hits on Google are to this Wikipedia article, so obviously he is not notable even at the BBC or BAFTA. The slighltly high hit rate lately (to the tune of ten hits) are probably 2 mine and some others coming from the discussion of
Oneworld.net
OneWorld.net at
WP:RFD; typically gets less than five hits a month. He is mentioned as the editor of Domesday vol. 2
here at the BBC but so are loads of other non-notable people.
Si Trew (
talk)
03:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep: Appears to meet WP:ANYBIO (subject has received a BAFTA). A poorly-written article should be cleaned up, not deleted. Suggest tagging with {{ like resume}}. -- N Y Kevin 04:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, it was not just any old BAFTA but a Lifetime Achievement Award. Move to Peter Armstrong (producer) like others in Special:Search/intitle:producer – I would do it now but do not want to confuse this AfD. – Fayenatic L ondon 11:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Reads like a resume, yes. Needs moved to producer title, yes. However, it is sourced now, even though Domesday doesn't even mention him in its article here. — Wylie pedia 07:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.