The result was Delete Mhiji 00:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC) reply
reads like a resume, questioning notability, but I see that the article is created by a well-established Wikipedian. Not sure what the /temp part is in the title. If this is being built, doesn't it belong in the User space instead of the main space? -- CPAScott 14:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Bizarre adventure. The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.
Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. jp× g 07:28, 18 October 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply
We already have the identical List of Roma people. Mad Jack 02:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus ( Liberatore, 2006). 17:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
some original research, content better suited for a fansite, not appropriate for an encyclopedia. WP:NOT-- Philo 07:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
* Keep, but rewrite
NoelleWiley 18:58, 31 August 2006 Note: user's only edits are to AFD's, registered 2 days ago.
[1]
Comment Do you want to prove every detail that appears on that page? I think that's a bad idea and what I read was true. Or do you want to prove the fact that the St. Jefferson Credit Union completed it's work between 1998 and 2001? ProSieben 13:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I understand your interest of providing a timeline of events in the canon, but the current format of the article is just restrictive and narrow in scope, hence my initial recommendation to have the entire article rewritten with a proper encyclopedia format (but with some designs elements based on the current revision). ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 09:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) ╫ reply
On the other hand, it has been noticed that substantial amounts of plot summaries were provided in most of the series' character listings; making them hard to track, find and piece together in those pages. It would have been a good idea to move much of these information into a dedicated article, providing easy readability of detailed plot summaries. I have also picked up a long addition in Grand Theft Auto (series) [2] that contains the storyline in the entire series in the form of prose (although it needs work). Merging any of the abovementioned bodies of text into this article would technically categorize it as part of a GTA article series. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 09:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) ╫ reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
No sources, basically no wf'cation, no cats, extremely POV title with abbreviations, just an odd article. Added to numerous "DVD" sections of the so-called "affected" show's articles. Staxringold talk contribs 02:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
More from my webcomic nn watchlist is Slightly damned, found here. There are 150 links for "Slightly damned" although none of these are from anything approaching a reliable source, and quite a few of them are irrelevent to the subject. This is not notable, I doubt the entire art site http://www.raizap.com/ would pass WP:WEB let alone one of its webcomics. - Hahnch e n 00:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Another webcomic article which just chronicles what it's about without actually telling us why anyone should care. You can see the comic here although there are numerous links within the article itself. The website manages an Alexa rank of 2 million and the name of the website "black wave rising" generates 11 Google hits. You can see how notable and popular this website is just by reading the latest news post where it encourages everyone to vote every day on various topsites so it can make it into the top 100. - Hahnch e n 00:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable webcomic, found here on the comic genesis free web host. Probably written by the webcomic author User:Kichi-Kuro and one of her associates a User:Noriko Kuro. No assertion of notability in the article, 8 members in their forum and manages 17 Google hits for "Project Jyuunishi". - Hahnch e n 00:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod removed without comment. Simply not notable. Delete. BlueValour 00:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Bobet 15:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Protologism, google hits on this link back to this article or aren't about this at all. So, fails Wikipedia:Verifiability, among other things Xyzzyplugh 00:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested speedy; seems like a nonnotable band to me but author made arguments for notability on the article's talk page, so I'm moving it here. NawlinWiki 00:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. `' mikka (t) 01:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
From the article "it has never been linked with any modern river." In other words, it is unverified as having existed, and assuming fictionality for now, it is not noteable beyond this one reference. Blood red sandman 01:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Thanks for keeping it! Solar Apex ( talk) 05:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
del Wikipedia is not genealogy. A thoroughly nonnotable surname, on the first glance. `' mikka (t) 01:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Sango 123 01:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Also listing the following articles:
Advertisements for non-notable companies and the building that houses them, all fail WP:CORP. Structured Training hints at coining the term "structured training", but no evidence of this. -- AbsolutDan (talk) 01:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Unless somebody can prove this article's worth and salvage it, it would not seem to be an important topic and should be deleted. Also, the person seems to have created it for themself and it does not seem to be worth fixing and maintaining such an unimportant article.
queso man 01:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This seems pure vanity and no sources are given. D1Puck1T 01:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
:) Dlohcierekim 12:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable website that does not include any outside sources within the article and generates 8 unique google results. Erechtheus 01:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This page, as well as its duplicate at Core-b, appears to be a neologism referring to a specific group of people. The current version doesn't refer to the people per se, but a look at previous edits will suggest that it's about a small group. Either way, I find zero Google hits for "Core Bevarsu," and am led to believe this is a non-notable neologism. Delete both. (I should note that a PROD tag was removed from Core B, precipitating this AfD.) Tony Fox (arf!) 02:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. - Mailer D iablo 22:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Advertisement, fails WP:CORP, non-NPOV. Prod deleted by original author. Author appears to be from the company itself and using this article as an advertisement (also has warning on user page). Orphaned. Edits by user appear to be malicious, as well. -- JS talk 01:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. --- Deville ( Talk) 21:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
NN Not notable-organization (speedy was contested)
abakharev 02:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Weak Keep Company does not appear to be particularly notable, but the film series it distributes in the US is (with it's own WP article). Company does have a IMDB listing. Article appears not to be written by an employee, but a fan. Lots of room for improvement though. Seaphoto 01:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment I haven't heard of the company, but some of the movies they're claimed to be distributing are somewhat infamous, so that may count towards a keep. Mark Grant 02:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Zsinj Talk 00:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research. See Talk:America = 50. Omphaloscope » talk 02:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete by consensus and per article contents. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
NN enough. It was on speedy, but I think it should be discussed abakharev 02:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 21:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable per WP:MUSIC - Nv8200p talk 02:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 14:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
It's a bridge. So what? User:Zoe| (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer D iablo 22:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article, as I've stated again and again, seems to not be so much an encyclopedia article as it is a slight bit of a vanity article by the fans of this website. This website has gained a few awards from a site known as DaFastLane, but I haven't been able to locate any information about DaFastLane on Wikipedia (aside from the article proposed for deletion here) or Google (a few hits), and it isn't listed on Alexa. They won five awards in one year, but that does not yet qualify them for notability under WP:WEB, which no other eligibility requirements are met on either.
Until they win these DaFastLane awards again next year, or until they satisfy the requirements another way, I feel it's safe to say that the article deserves deletion. Sephylight 02:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
For one, those so-called five awards don't belong to Reloaded. They belong mostly to a person, not a site, that person being Kosta, for the work and effort he's put in Abandonia. It's quite pathetic that Reloaded calls his awards as theirs and use them to claim rights on a page on here. The only award that does go to the site, is only a nomination, not an actual award. It needs to be mentioned that for the DaFastLane Awards, anybody can nominate anybody, and the people from Reloaded've all nominated Reloaded for as many things as they could, of which this one got pulled through. Same goes with that "Most helpful scener" award. As Abandonware's spread out over multiple communities, the scener who can have most people vote for him, will win that one, even though I can name ten sceners that're far more helpful, and that's just from one community. The only person that actually's an established value in the scene, is Kosta, who did deserve the awards he got. Those still aren't awards for Reloaded, but for Kosta. In other words, all those so-called awards're self-induced by Reloaded itself, which I don't think will make them count at all.
Another is their so-called claim to be the first site dedicated to freeware games. I don't know where they got that, and everybody knows that's a lie. They even have affiliates on their main page, linking to other freeware sites that've been 'round far longer, so either they don't know their own site or they're lying badly 'bout that.
Yet another thing, which goes hand in hand with the previous part, but seems to've been used as a separate reason, is that they claim that before Reloaded, you had to search the AGS, AGI and Gamemaker communities, and aside from that, using Google. So far, they've pretty much only used the AGS community, so that's been untrue, plus, if they think that's the only way to find freeware games, it just shows the site won't live long enough to become notable, as those that run it show they don't understand what they're focusing on. There are far more ways to get to freeware than just those three, and that's the very basics that should be known to run such a site for a longer period of time.
As far as the notability goes, they have a bit of a point. I know some of my friends know that site, and I know a few freeware game developers that've been in touch with them, and they all think the site provides lowest-quality information (up to the point that some games' information's all in Engrish) and's generally an insult to both the developers as to the games themselves, so they do know the site, but prefer to stay as far away from it as possible. Also, those freeware game developers they did get in touch with, were mostly, if not all, brought in touch with that site by a member they kicked out a long time ago, and although they haven't been in touch with any of those freeware developers, they do seem to claim his work as theirs whenever they can.
Another thing you can notice if you dig around on their and Abandonia's forums, is that they have a high tendency to mob whenever something or somebody has an opinion that goes against them. It's already happening on here, and you can be sure they'll bring more of their croonies in to increase the number of people that back their view up, but always just say the same thing (like Deathdude). So be aware of that. You might see five-six voices here, but they're still just one and a couple of puppets. -- 195.144.90.5 13:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I see that I have to both apologize and clarify my earlier statement. (Hopefully without going too far of topic from the discussion at hand). When I said that "Another point is that there wasn't really a Freeware center, before AR was created." and "AR is truly the first site to gather all freeware games on one site, regardless of age, engine and genre." I did not mean that AR was the very first freeware site to have been created. Far from it. What I meant was that AR is the most notable of the lot. If you do a quick Alexa ranking with other sites, you'll find that no-one is ranked as high as AR. (Apart from HOTU, but that isn't a freeware only dedicated site. It just have a lot of freeware games thrown into the mix).
For instance, www.BigBlueCup.com (The AGS official homepage) has an Alexa rating of 120 353, yet is has a Wikipedia page of its own.
There is no doubt that AGS deserves the page, but from a purely Alexa statistical point of view, AR should deserve it more. So, just having a good Alexa ranking should not be the only criteria for an Wikipedia article (as there would be no discussion whether AR deserved it or not, then), but in my mind in order to deserve an article, the site should offer something that no-one else does, and that makes it unique.
In AR's case, this uniqueness is found in the effort placed into each single update,
the interviews with the makers, the diversity of games hosted (in terms of engine and genres)
and the banners made for the games. I know that there is an overload of adventure games on the site, and we are trying to fix that. However, as AR is a community driven project, we showcase what people review. As long as we get in more adventure games, than other games - we will continue to put out more adventures.
If you take a look at the forum topic in which we ask the public for help ( http://www.reloaded.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=116 ), you will see that the number of Adventure games on that list is very small in comparrison to the other genres. (If the above link is against the rules of this discussion, then I apologize, and a mod should feel free to edit it away). So, in conclusion, I apologize for the above statements that might have been confusing, but I hope that I have managed to get across my views for why I believe that AR deserves an article of its own (and not just be merged with Abandonia). Tom Henrik 14:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable site fails WP:WEB, Alexa rank is 1,440,263... the highest I've ever seen VoiceOfReason 02:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete Since the previous "no consensus" AFD nomination the notability of this webcomics is still close to none. What is more, it looks like it is dead since February. I previously voted to merge/redirect, because of some cultural curiosity, but now my opinion swayed. Mukadderat 02:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer D iablo 22:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
While notable, this article is unable to meet both WP:V and WP:BLP simultaneously, due to the only legitimate reference available being a violation of the subject's privacy. Nomination from the article's original author. kotra 02:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable non-professional cricket club with non-notable players (none have articles -- the seemingly valid links are all for other persons). There are no Google results for the name of the club and the city. Erechtheus 03:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Tricky case. Supposedly a Soviet missile project that never reached the prototype stage; initially, that seems fairly plausible. I got halfway through cleaning it up before I checked for external sources, and found nothing, via either google or JSTOR, for L231d or L230, that related even remotely to russian missiles. Furthermore, the article's creator (or at least his IP) signed as "L231d" on a talk page comment, and on his talk page there's evidence that something he created was deleted as nonsense. So, all told, I'm thinking hoax, but I'm not quite confident enough to kill it quietly with a prod tag. Thoughts? -- Robth Talk 03:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete unless it can be verified. Heimstern Läufer 20:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per Heimstern Läufer and Robth. -Chelsea reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Taxonomy is nonsense, appears unrecognized by any recent authority. Dysmorodrepanis 22:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) reply
There is no such thing as a Californian falcon as far as I know. Besides, one of the two (!) binomial names given for it is that of the Peregrine Falcon. pointless 12:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Some sort of POV essay or copy-paste junk. It makes some sense here and there, but is entirely unencyclopedic. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. - Mailer D iablo 22:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not Notable; this is a local radio show, it's been on the air for about 2 months; as far as I can tell, the article makes no particular claim of notability. Wikipedia does have some articles on particular modern radio shows, but in general they seem to make claims to being particularly notable. I don't think we want an article on every show at every radio station. Brianyoumans 03:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
"Keep". Many local non-syndicated radio shows have Wikipedia entries including Kevin and Bean, Kidd Chris, and The Doghouse with JV and Elvis. Apparently their ratings in Boston do indeed show that they are "notable". The show is known for many national things such as the aforementioned feud with Kevin Smith, and Rich disrupting Martha Burk's protest at the Masters which was covered by every major network and spawned an ESPN Sportscenter catchphrase.
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. My heart was telling me "don't delete" but my head said otherwise and it won. WUUUUU!!!!!!!! Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person (fails WP:BIO). 1 Google hit. Erechtheus 03:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sango 123 02:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Totally contextless, doubtful that it's not a copy/paste from the named source, but I cannot confirm. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The article was written by myself as a general summary of two books I have written on the regiment. I have researched it for five years, so I think I know its history. Hopkins is public domain. Also included are more journals and letters then one can count.
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
[Check Google hits]; 0 of them. I can't tell if this is a neologism, a non-notable design of a product, or whatever else, but my gut tells me it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, at least not yet. (|-- UlTiMuS 04:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted per article author. Syrthiss 21:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Pretty obviously a joke page. Placed a prod on it and notified the author, but the prod was removed by an IP. Nscheffey( T/ C) 04:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Tram stops are, well, tram stops. Except when they happen to be a station they are generally indistinguishable from bus stops. Unless there is something notable about a particular tram stop I don't see the point or need for an article especially since all the information is already in the main article Midland Metro. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. This is a multinomination for deletion of all tram stop articles in Category:Midland Metro stops excepting, of course, the stations (Snow Hill, Jewellery Quarter and Hawthornes). Delete all. BlueValour 04:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted, poorly-worded ad-like blurb for a doubtful product. If it is to be mentioned at all do that in the existing article. I really can't see leaving this to run its week. Garrett Talk 21:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, for some reason. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. No sources, no verifiability, and poorly written to boot. VoiceOfReason 04:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 02:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Apperently a young rapper, includes no real claim to notability, no chart posistions, admits no full album yet, the two sources are an AOL Music page and his myspace. - M ask 04:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 08:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Google hits: Logical UNifier of Extensive Transfer Arrays and LUNETA; neither are promising. Seems like NN techcruft. (|-- UlTiMuS 05:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 08:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO. If he were "famous", he would get hits on Google. He gets none (per User:IceCreamAntisocial). -- Omicronpersei8 ( talk) 05:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
-- why does it matter if he has a google page or not? all i need to do to get on google is make a stupid webpage somewhere with my name all over it. i support this article because john tridel is a lyrical genius (he talks about the CHURCH AND STATE FOOLS) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.126.198.126 ( talk • contribs) 04:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sango 123 02:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fancruft; Do we really need a list like this? Would anyone ever use it? (|-- UlTiMuS 05:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The keep arguments are quite poor, and are provided by WP:SPU's for the most part. Xoloz 17:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
A punk house in, well, I guess somewhere near Langley. No notability asserted, unless the claim that it is haunted can be sourced. Prod was removed without comment. ~ trialsanderrors 05:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
http://discorder.ca/2006/09/vancouver-alf-house-on-east-georgia/
0
The result was Speedy Delete. Robdurbar 10:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is completely unnecessary in light of the article at The Cheetah Girls 2 that featured much of the information here prior to the creation of this article. I have added the information in this page to the main article; now all that needs to happen is for this one to go away. Erechtheus 05:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep & move. Sango 123 02:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
As with many list articles, this article has both original research and neutral point of view issues. They are clearly present in this article due to the awkward explanation of Michael Keaton's character's inclusion from Multiplicity. Erechtheus 05:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Rescued from speedy delete, but notability highly questionable. Yes they had four records, but Taang! Records appears to be a storefront operation, while Musical Tragedies/Toxic Shock has no Google presence at all. "[B]eing proud to be fat, drunk, and stupid" does not, even in these benighted times, guarantee stardom. I hope. If the closing admin determines that Western Civilization can survive without this article, note that their albums and EPs have articles too, and this is a multiple nomination including those articles also. Herostratus 06:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete both. Sango 123 02:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn company. Xi95 06:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Addition - I have added the owner of Linearstone, Glenn Herrin, to this AFD. The two articles have the same author (who has done no other edits). -- Brianyoumans 07:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The article is unsourced, not well-written, and even the keep comments here are weak ones. This subject may be notable, but this article is of no help to anyone. Good subject for a history restore once a decent article is written, however. Xoloz 17:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website Xi95 06:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:V and doesn't prove notability. Considered this a redirect candidate; however, there are only 10Ghits including Wikipedia, and the link to the Japanese page is to the Ken Kitashiba article, not a "Duke Kita" article. The Ken Kitashiba article on the JA Wikipedia then links back to this article on the English site as proof that his nickname is Duke Kita. Dekimasu 06:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 23:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Apparently non-notable academic who fails WP:PROF. I cannot find from independent sources any biography of him, or anything that suggest that the books he has authored are well-known or significant. Kimchi.sg 01:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Initially nominated for deletion on 19 August 2006. Relisted here for further consensus. Thanks.-- Samir धर्म 07:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete, no notability claimed, vanity, unverifiable. NawlinWiki 17:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Totally unverifiable (see edit summary), and with only seven ghits, none of which are proper articles regarding him. David Mestel( Talk) 07:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a single statement in the article is sourced. The article is highly unencyclopedic .It is essentially just a propaganda piece and has the tone and suggestion of a leaflet disseminated by SMSM's followers. At best, there should be a complete rewrite. At worst, a complete deletion. Hkelkar 07:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Neologism with extremely narrow scope (per User:Ultimus). -- Omicronpersei8 ( talk) 07:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There are other Fiesta del Sol's that may meet notability standards, but not this one, so the recommendation is delete or merge. The festival again this summmer did not go down, due to lack of corporate sponsorship, a google search of "fiesta del sol ontario" found little else except a cancellation notice. It has no apparent historical value or mention, either in the article, or that could be sourced, other than how long it has gone on. If historical value can be found, and it can be differentiated from the "Chicago" Fiesta del Sol, then will reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmaguir1 ( talk • contribs) 2006-08-29 07:59:04
The result was speedy delete as blatant self-admitted hoax. Why bother keeping a page with choice snippets like these (for the benefit of non-admins):
and last but not least,
Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Suspected hoax, Google gives no hits on this name. The person seems to be made up by the creator. -- TexMurphy 08:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete and redirect to emoticon. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Complete nonsense, was tagged for Speedy deletion, but tag was removed, therefore listing here. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 08:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. Interested editor may merge from history as warranted. Xoloz 17:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Poorly written, badly sourced tripe... absolutely no notably anywhere on the page--didn't see much of any sort anywhere, conferences are notoriously NOT notable, will change if evidence given on page... and by evidence, I do NOT mean a local news network running a segment, see talk page for notability questions —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kmaguir1 ( talk • contribs) .
Also, further evidence of notability - this is CNN coverage [21]. So, the conference was newsworthy, by wiki criteria, it should be included! 137.205.132.170 10:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT for things made up in school one day, as evidenced by the fact that none of the first page of ghits refers to it in this context. David Mestel( Talk) 08:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted. kingboyk 09:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
nn, 0 ghits. David Mestel( Talk) 08:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted. Seems to be sockpuppets working together to create nonsense == vandalism. kingboyk 08:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
A hoax. No Google hits for "Evan Jonathan Wright", "“Muffenta", or "“Bisqueten". GregorB 08:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sango 123 01:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
A band, album and song. Questionable compliance with WP:MUSIC:
Previous nomination - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateur Transplants (no consensus). kingboyk 08:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod removed by author; I stand by my original claim that this is a NN, unverifiable neologism, unacceptable per WP:NEO. Delete (|-- UlTiMuS 08:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
advertisement/vanity & not notable; prod on 8th July was removed. Marasmusine 09:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The article doesn't distinguish it from any other lab in a university. If it really "does in fact have a creditable history", someone can rewrite the article and tell it. - Bobet 13:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. A university research group with no notability of its own. Nuttah68 09:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I would have to beg the differ. This is indeed a UC Berkeley lab. And this lab does in fact have a creditable history, and is worthy of a wiki-page.
The result was keep. - Bobet 15:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result wasspeedy deleted as a copyvio and (even with permission) pretty much contextless etc. -- wwwwolf ( barks/ growls) 12:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
There are two problems here:
The result was keep. Please defer merge discussions to the article talk page. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn group. Ghoe 09:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete. --- GIen 10:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
nn companies. and Japanese WIkipedia article as delete. see ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/ウィキペディア_(会社) Ghoe 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website. Ghoe 10:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all three. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article and the related articles on Dominic Joutsen and Alexey Zimakov. All three are creations of User:Joutsen (note that the name indicates possible vanity. The three articles are ridiculously promotional in tone. Moreover, the content seems pretty much unverifiable, although one would have to conduct a russian-search in cyrillic to be sure. I believe that all three fail WP:BIO. The total number of unique Ghits for "alexey Zimakov" for instance is 9 [22]. Only two of these are not wikipedia mirrors. You find another 11 for the spelling "alexei Zimakov". Joutsen gets 23 unique Ghits [23] and it seems all are either listings or mp3 download sites where anyone can upload. 10 uniques hits for "Edward Mekhraliev" [24] one of which explaining that he is currently Joutsen's boss! Pascal.Tesson 10:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was train wreck. As has been expressed by many, many people here, nothing good is going to come from this nomination. This closure is not a judgement for or against any one article, please re-list seperately where appropriate. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Reality TV show cruft, not notable outside TV show. MER-C 10:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Also nominated for the same reason are:
It is noted in previous AFDs that reality TV contestants generally aren't notable unless they come close to winning the show. Many of these do not assert notability under WP:BIO. MER-C 11:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Alternative to a mass delete
I would suggest keep on at least those two. I admit some of the articles are a bit excessive, though. Fabricationary 04:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Short entry on a completely unremarkable K12 school, one of the apparently 105,000 K12 schools in the USA alone [25]. Having an article for each and every one of them would make Wikipedia truly an indiscriminate collection of information. Fram 11:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep (and copyedit). Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Ooooh, controversy surrounding SpongeBob SquarePants! Has he been seeing some comely mermaid wench on the side? Does the show carry Satanic messages? Er, no. Actually this is more or less made up, as is evident from the unreliability ofthe sources. Only one item is properly sourced (if you allow Snopes as a reliable source), and there is more then enough room for that short sentence in the main article. Seriously, there is no significant controversy surrounding the rectangular yellow one. Just zis Guy you know? 11:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Allow me some explanation, as this page does not convey it very well. The article is an essay comparing and contrasting Locke and Demosthenes in comparison to Peter and Valentine Wiggen, two characters in the novel Ender's Game. They took the two respective names as pseudonyms to write politics. Its all nice and rosy, except its very much original research. In fact it exemplifes original research in the highest degree through a comparative essay by the page's two authors. I like the book and its sequels very much, but wikipedia is not the place for personal essays. -- Kevin_b_er 02:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable website, failing web notability (hasn't been featured in important media, hasn't won a well known and independent award, neither is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators). Alexa rank of 304,480, forum with 401 members, notability claim is that they are currently translating a game, Mother 3. Site is fairly empty (Download and Tutorials sections are empty), with few links. Deprodded without comment. [29] -- ReyBrujo 04:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 23:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination: Not the best of articles. It lacks in formatting, but that's not reason enough to speedy as the tagger suggested. Based on the YouTube link provided, this person appears to have been part of one or more televised martial arts matches. Makes him notable enough for me. Looking for community opinion before I remove any deletion tags. I suggest Keep. - Mgm| (talk) 11:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep(Provisionally) Its a fan base article - a 9-3 record does not make you the greatest grappler ever known even if you took out Royce. Still if it could be just fleshed out a bit - where he's from, when he was born, something - then it would have some value. Among the BJJ crowd taking out a Gracie is notable. As it stands its a piece of fluff. Peter Rehse 06:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Was tagged as a speedy, but article claimed the band has an EP. Nomination, no vote. - Mgm| (talk) 12:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 21:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There is not any content that would not fit in each movie's article. Not to mention most of the text on the page is verbatim in each movie's own article. Also, there is already a mention of the series at Living Dead. Joltman 12:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 21:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Advertisement. Fails WP:CORP. Pascal.Tesson 12:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 18:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Blatant advertisement for non-notable company, no sign of satisfying WP:CORP criteria. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. The article read: '''Hajieg Agha Khanum''' was the mother of [[Ayatollah Khomeini]]. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
There are 2 problems.
The result was Keep and rename to Marriage websites as matrimony refers to the Catholic marriage on WP and this article does not appear to be restricted to one faith alone. Marriage is the wider term for the union of two people in secular and religious practices, so it appears to be more appropriate for this article. (aeropagitica) 17:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Very narrow towards two sites in India, and may also be WP:SPAM (Not 100% sure on that though). Michael Billington ( talk • contribs) 12:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
*Delete - per nom. Most of the article is OR ("Believed to be a more serious venue", "Leading matrimonials sites.."). Not encyclopedic. -
Aksi_great (
talk -
review me) 12:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Change to keep per great work by Uncle G. But needs rewrite. -
Aksi_great (
talk -
review me) 12:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Being a professor at a private school is not inherently notable. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Average college professor. Has been tagged for notability for quite a while now. Fails WP:BIO. Pascal.Tesson 12:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 17:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Speedy was denied since members of this band have been involved in more notable bands although a "three month stint with Good Charlotte" is a bit weak... I believe this group fails WP:MUSIC. Pascal.Tesson 12:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
While I appreciate this may at first sound noteworthy, there are a surprising number of these so-called 'minor planets' (e.g. big asteroids) in our solar system. Just because Pluto is now one of them does not make them all noteable. delete as a NN rock. Blood red sandman 12:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer D iablo 20:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Subject is not notable enough for its own entry; description of character already exists at List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch. -- Merope 12:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable per WP:BIO; 3 Google results. Jim Backus Goes Bowling (which was previously listed under the subject's Filmography) is currently up for deletion. Prod tag removed by anon. ... discospinster talk 13:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not Suited for an Encyclopedia - Irrelevant. Refers to a "scam" on eBay.. Boochan 13:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I believe this band fails WP:MUSIC. Its only claim to notability is that their music was played in various talk shows, of which there is no source, making it unverifiable, and that they won it was nominated for the 16th Annual San Diego Music Awards of 2006, which is a local competition (and they didn't win.) The creator's only edits are to this article, and removed the prod without comment. Placing Def league up as well as a redirect. ColourBurst 14:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Bloor-Danforth (TTC). - Bobet 15:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
DeleteMerge - Station doesn't exist, nor is it planed, proposed, or under consideration - it's a fantasy
Nfitz 14:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was DELETE. Vociferousness of argument does not equal strength of argument. The raw vote total was 12-6 Delete, on top of which the Delete side had much the stronger arguments. Let us all recall that Wikipedia is basically a tool for scholarship, education, and research. No evidence has been presented that inclusion of this article would markedly enhance the encyclopedia. It appears from the one of the stronger Keep arguments is that she appears in her own frequently-aired TV commercials. As one contributor commented, "I have seen her commercials on TV all the time, she is very notable." That is not a strong argument. The remainder of the Keep arguments are not much stronger. Herostratus 03:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply
NOTE: It now comes to my attention that this AfD had been spammed trolling for Delete votes. These votes would not have changed my decision (which is mostly based on strength of arguments) but they did change the raw vote totals. If this AfD close is brought to deletion review, commentors might want to take notice of the tainted nature of the discussion. Herostratus 03:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This article, under its previous title "Roni Deutch" was deleted through this AfD. A DRV consensus overturned this deletion in light of new information, and directed the move to the new, full name. Please consult the DRV for the new evidence before commenting here. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 15:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
YOUR MONEY Pacific Business Services Inc. will present a free seminar on Living Trusts at 10 a.m., 1 p.m., 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday. Speakers will be lawyer Roni Deutch and tax specialist Stan Unruh. Information: 431-0381. * Stephen E. Prout, a certified financial planner, and Richard E. Hemb, a lawyer, will present a free Living Trust Seminar sponsored by Smart Trust Advisors at 10 a.m., 2 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday at Smuggler's Inn, 3737 N. Blackstone Ave. * Pamela Catling, a certified...
YOUR MONEY The first in a series of money management workshops sponsored by the American Association of Retired Persons and the University of California Cooperative Extension will be held 6-8 p.m. Tuesday in the College Community Congregational Church, 5550 N. Fresno St.* A free seminar on Living Trusts will be presented by Pacific Business Services Inc. at 10 a.m., 1 p.m., 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Thursday. The speakers will be Roni Deutch, a lawyer, and Stan Unruh, a tax specialist. Information:...
YOUR MONEY A free seminar on Women Inheriting Investment Responsibilities will be presented at 10 a.m. Tuesday in the Merrill Lynch office at 5260 N. Palm Ave., Suite 100 by Dick Powell and Pete Baumstark, financial consultants; Kevin Gunner, a lawyer, and James E. Cornwell, a chartered life underwriter.A luncheon will follow at D'Mils restaurant. For reservations: 436-3323. * Pacific Business Services Inc. will sponsor free seminars on Living Trusts at 2-4 p.m. and 6:45-8:45 p.m....
Corner to see shops, offices Complex will spruce up Watt and Myrtle in North Highlands. A $4 million office and retail complex that will house a law firm which represents taxpayers having problems with the Internal Revenue Service is taking shape at a key North Highlands intersection. Sacramento County Supervisor Roger Dickinson said the complex demonstrates the "new level of energy and vitality we are seeing along Watt Avenue." Construction has already started on a two-story, 20,000- square-foot office building and 4,500 square feet of...
YOUR MONEY College Planning Services of Fresno will sponsor a free seminar for parents needing Money for Children's College Education at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Ramada Inn. Terry Wilfong will be the speaker. Information and reservations: 228-8051.* Richard D. Moore and Rick R. Staggs, certified financial planners, will give an introductory class called The One-Hour Financial Manager from 10 to 0 a.m. and 7:30 to 9 p.m. Tuesday. Information and reservations: 227-0704. * Carole R. Ford, a...
FENDICK REPEATS STUNNING PERFORMANCE Stanford's Patty Fendick shocked top-seeded Caroline Kuhlman of Southern Cal for the second time in three days, handing her a 6-4, 6-4 loss Wednesday in the quarterfinals of the NCAA women's individual tennis championships in Austin, Texas.On Monday, Fendick snapped Kuhlman's 30-match win streak 7-5, 6-2 during the team championship. The Cardinal won the team title. On Wednesday, Fendick went up 2-0 in the first set and never allowed the USC sophomore to...
'DOGS NAMED NCAA SOFTBALL REGIONAL HOSTS NORPAC HONORS PARRENT, WRIGHT The good news came right on schedule Monday for Fresno State University's softball team. The Bulldogs are in the NCAA postseason tournament, and they're taking the NorPac Conference's top award winners, pitcher Melanie Parrent and Coach Margie Wright, with them. FSU was awarded an at-large bid and, better yet, assigned to host the Northwest Regional at Bulldog Diamond this weekend against 10th-ranked Long Beach State. Parrent was named the player of the year...
'DOGS, CAL SPLIT IN SOFTBALL AFTER CONTROVERSY IN OPENER They'll be talking a long time about the wild pitch that really wasn't Saturday at Bulldog Diamond. That call -- made by home plate umpire Dennis Wren -- resulted in a 1-0 Fresno State University victory over the California Bears in the first game of an important NorPac Conference double-header before a sunbathed crowd of 947. The ninth-ranked Bears, lip-biting mad over the outcome of that opener, went on to plaster the sixth-ranked Bulldogs 4-2 in the second game and...
2 NYC lawsuits claim company failed to deliver promised tax help A company whose nationwide advertising offered tax delinquents a chance to settle with the IRS for "pennies on the dollar" collected hefty fees but often couldn't deliver on its promises, according to a pair of lawsuits. New York City's Department of Consumer Affairs filed a lawsuit Monday accusing American Tax Relief of bombarding households with junk mail that exaggerated what it could do for clients with big tax debts. Separately, a...
As spooky as the law allows Sacramento Bee / Manny Crisostomo For those who don't think visiting a lawyer's offices is scary enough, the Sacramento staff of Roni Lynn Deutch dressed Friday for Halloween - tax director Scott Schimleski is Dracula, behind legal assistant Le Deutch - and entertained youngsters....
Dear NoelleWiley: At the expense of spelling out what is stunningly obvious to everyone, you stated: "I have seen her commercials on TV all the time, she is very notable." You yourself mentioned the "commercials." Sorry, but a reasonable person will infer that you are implying that her being in a commercial made her worthy of any encyclopedia article. You yourself linked the two concepts in one sentence. Yours, Famspear 00:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear fellow editors: Actually, the language at WP:BIO is "Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals whose work is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field" (emphasis added). Are we seriously trying to contend that Ms. Deutch's work is "widely recognized" in the field of tax law merely because she advertises? Who is "recognizing" her legal work? Legal experts and scholars, or the people who watch her commercials on daytime TV? Please show us where or how her work is part of the "enduring historical record" in the field of U.S. law, or U.S. tax law. Advertising oneself on television? Under that line of reasoning Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. could have rated a Wikipedia article had he never served as a Federal judge or written the scholarly articles and books he wrote, and had simply advertised on television (had TV existed back then). It seems we are saying that what is being recognized is not her legal work, not her contribution to legal scholarship or legal history, but rather the fact that she advertises and is well known because she advertises. Yours, Famspear 18:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep: as far as I can tell, players who have played for their country's youth sides are considered notable enough to have an article. See England_national_under-21_football_team#Current_and_recent_players for example. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable youth footballer, appears to fail vanity guidelines ( WP:VANITY), as well as being non-neutral point of view ( WP:NPOV). Original author has only contributed to this article, so possibly an autobiography. Bob talk 15:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was speedy deleted under CSD A7. A DRV consensus overturned, finding an assertion of notability. This article is submitted to AfD for full consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 15:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
While the Pillar of Fire Church may or may not be notable (it gets only 530 Google hits), there's no need for these auxilliary pages about its employees and their children to exist. Notability not established, fails Google test (Mr. Dallenbach gets almost no hits at all), reads like vanity and spam.
These articles are also part of the bundled AfD:
wikipediatrix 15:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment: Why is the college someone attended an "odd detail"? Every biography lists where someone went to college. As a matter of fact each college has a category for alumi. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 21:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. -- CharlotteWebb 20:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Doesn't seem to assert notability. Delete unless notability shown. -- Nlu ( talk) 16:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a spammy and a non-notable website Alexa:812,097. There are plenty of results on Google, but the first several do not appear to be of the sort that would satisfy WP:CORP Erechtheus 16:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. -- CharlotteWebb 21:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
This guy's life really has completely no relevance to the world Nwe 14:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
here is the last stable version with references intact from before the vote for deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pillar_of_Fire_Church&oldid=63154355
This article is NN and completely POV, devoid of any sources backing up the information listed. The Selected Coverage section is misleading in lable as none of the links actually pertain to the church, but to church members, and they are listed as obituaries. Shazbot85 Talk 16:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 19:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
You wrote: "The school never makes the claim of affiliation with the church". If you are still disputing the relationship, here is the text from the website that you say does not contain any mention of affiliation:
Our school partners with a local church, Coastside Community Church. We are a dual ministry -- a church and a school -- with collaborative leadership, complimentary functions, and shared facilities. Our vision is for harmonious growth of church and school with each ministry strengthening and helping the other.
Our school and church belong to a group of national and international ministries founded and directed by the Pillar of Fire, International. The Pillar of Fire provides us with oversight, advice, and material support, and gives us opportunities to participate in congregational, educational, media, and missions ministries around the world.
The Pillar of Fire is an evangelical Christian organization that emphasizes personal faith in Jesus Christ and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit that results in lives devoted to Christian purity and service. The name for the organization is based in the biblical account of God leading his people with a pillar of cloud during the day and a pillar of fire by night (Exodus 13:21-22). We believe that God continues to lead His people through all life's circumstances.
The Pillar of Fire is headquartered in Zarephath, New Jersey. It has six congregations in the United States, five Christian schools, an accredited Christian college, three radio stations, various publications, and missions/partner ministries overseas in England, India, Malawi, Liberia, Nigeria, and Costa Rica.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
Please stick to the topic at hand and work to provide sources. Don't try and de-rail this discussion or try and avert attention away from this unsourced article by providing your opinion pertaining to my character. I consider that mildly insulting but will take it in good faith and again reiterate that what is provided remains unsourced. Also, you are incorrect in your assumption that a "vote for deletion" decides whether a page stays or goes. A neutral moderator will weigh the evidence and ultimately make the descision. If you can't provide the sources, and by now I'm assuming you can't through your use of diversionary tactics, I suggest you simply take the article down until some sources can be added. If they can't, then there doesn't need to be an article. Shazbot85 Talk 03:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
These articles are also nominated in a separate AfD:
Now now, calm down and take it elsewhere. This page should be shut down soon as I have withdrawn my AfD claim. Shazbot85 Talk 01:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear even close to making WP:WEB. Google turns up very little other than related self promotion. Alexa claims rank over 2,000,000. Also, please note there are several redirects ( Windows RG, Jamesweb, "windows rg", and Windows rg) which should probably go if this page goes.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn event Foo^ 16:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website Foo^ 16:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website. Foo^ 16:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn company Foo^ 16:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 14:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn company Foo^ 16:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus, so keep. (aeropagitica) 13:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete (nom) WP is not an arbitrary collection of lists. Articles can be added to an appropriate category. All this seems to be is a collection of redlinks and web links (which WP is also not). — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 16:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Suggest deletion or transwiki Computerjoe 's talk 17:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Fails WP:MUSIC, not verified, not NPOV, much of the article is a possible copyright violation [30] Nonpareility 17:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
del Read and laugh and delete. It is a political joke, not an urban legend, and of dubious notability, too. Does not warrant a separate article or any mention whatsoever. There are millions of jokes in the world. Wikipedia is not a jokebook. `' mikka (t) 17:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
merge as proposed on page. On Dutch wikipedia it is listed as an urban legend, not as a joke. Rex 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Merged in to Niagara Falls, Ontario. (aeropagitica) 13:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This recreational complex is not notable. IronDuke 17:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod; non-notable Geoffrey Spear 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Deleted by Vegaswikian. (aeropagitica) 13:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Article appears to be listcruft. Link in article leads to a section of iTunes that is for music downloaded from LimeWire (according to the article). Will be adding article to this AfD Wildthing61476 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep now that the article has been improved. (aeropagitica) 13:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable as far as I can determine, or a lack of citable sources at least - a Google search only results in the same phrase repeated by every website, always under an article called 'Sakya', which I think was originally copied from Wikipedia anyway. The lack of sources could be due to a language barrier, but I don't think this is the case. KZF 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE AS ORIGNAL RESEARCH. (aeropagitica) 13:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Some sort of essay. Original research. User:Zoe| (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork from the Winnie the Pooh article JBKramer 17:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork from Eeyore JBKramer 17:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork from Tigger JBKramer 17:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork of Piglet JBKramer 17:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Please defer merge-related discussion to the appropriate article talk page(s). Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This article, along with many of the other other articles dealing with the Biblical Mount Sinai give little information, if none at all, outside the main article. I request this page and all the others that I will nominate be deleted. Trevor 17:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because of reasons stated above.
Trevor 18:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I can also see the possibility of a merge, but I have experience in that area, so whatever the community agrees on is fine with me. Trevor 18:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete by consensus and response to keep advocates. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC). reply
List serving no encyclopedic purpose. It is growing, but for the past month noone has addressed my question on the talk page about the purpose it serves. It does not fulfill any of the purposes at Wikipedia:List guideline#Purpose of lists. I believe it violates the WP:NOT rules against being an indiscriminate collection of information and against articles not being "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics". GRBerry 17:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Article looks like it was written by him (writing style same as his website), only result on google is this page. - JeremyBanks Talk 17:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a protologism and original research -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
If you go back to the article you will see a link. In addition, if you google up "anglo/saxon celt" you will see thousands of hits. The condensing of the term to anglosaxoncelt serves only to eliminate the slash and space. Furthermore, if you state that this article serves to promote the point of view of the user, then you must also delete the wikipedia page which denotes "English people" because it also is only promoting a point of view. Ldjenks 19:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Huon, to correct you; I just googled your designation and got over 400 hits, and from all around the world, especially from former colonies of the UK, and many on reputable sites. The exponential growth of the use of the term on the Internet warrants its placement on Wikipedia. Furthermore, if you delete this term you must most certainly delete the designation of "English people" as an ethnic group. Worldwide the word "English" is used increasingly to denote a linguistic term, especially since English is the global language of the world. I travel the world as an ESL teacher, and believe me, since English has now reached global status, it would be in the best interests of the descendants of the UK to use more appropriate terms to denote their cultural heritage than "English".
I see you deleted my link from the article. So here it is again, another source which suggests mixing of anglo/saxon and celts involving DNA research. I have found other research alluding to similar discussions online, but can't locate it right now.
"At one time it was widely believed that the Anglo-Saxons mostly supplanted the Celtic populations. Recent genetic studies disagree, suggesting the Anglo-Saxons established political and cultural dominance over the Celts and intermarried with them. In particular, analyses performed upon the mitochondrial DNA of modern day English suggest that any continental admixture from the period of Germanic invasions would have been almost exclusively derived from the male line, suggesting a process of intermarriage between male invaders and female indigenous Celts." experts.about.com/e/e/en/English_people.htm
Oh, by the way, it appears that someone might have hacked into the about.com website and made a redirect of the above link to wikipedia's website on "English people" sometime within the past 12 hours- a rather shocking development. Which means that as an educated professional, I am now going to copy and paste all of the submissions on this topic, until this little matter can be cleared up, and until the link to about.com is working properly again. I am starting to wonder whether there is some political and/or racial motivation behind one or more of the people who want this submission deleted.
You seem be be willing to designate "English people" as an ethnic group. I don't know how you can rationalize "English people" as an ethnic group, while at the same time dismissing anglo/saxon celts, or anglosaxoncelts as an ethnic group when there are millions of us all over the world. I am merely changing the spelling from Anglo/saxon celt, a term which is showing exponential growth, largely as a result of DNA research, Furthermore, the reduction of the term into one single word "anglosaxoncelt" is starting to see growth on the Internet. This ethnic designation applies to millions of the descendants of former colonists of the UK and Ireland. It is a good solid term which, by the way, is also 'unifying' and not divisive and full of controversy like the term "English", which is more of a linguistic term, "English" seems to separate the 'celts' from the rest of the inhabitants of the United Kingdom, and furthermore, leaves the descendants of the colonists worldwide forever referring to ourselves as "Heinz fifty-sevens".
You need cultural experts, DNA experts, linguistic experts, anthropologists etc, on this topic. Submissions by bioligists and computer programmers, etc. to delete anglosaxoncelt or, if you prefer, anglo/saxon celt, from wikipedia, although important, I am afraid, are not adequate. The terms, anglo/saxon celt or anglosaxoncelt, should no be dismissed so lightly.
To quote Websters:
anglo-saxon: a person of English descent in any country
celtic: a branch of Indo-European languages spoken by the CELTS: Cornish, Breton and Welsh and Irish, Scottish, Gaelic and Manx.
So why not anglosaxoncelt or if you wish, the more traditional anglo/saxon celt?
I have read the page on wikipedia discussing 'anglo-celt'. I suppose the reason I am passionate about the addition of 'saxon' is because anglo/saxon is more commonly used in DNA research as well as celt. I don't see much of anglo-celt in DNA research papers. There should at least be a cross referencing of anglosaxoncelt and/or anglo/saxon celt to 'anglo-celt' until the matter can be settled. In Canada, an anglo-celt would be a person of celtic descent who speaks English, to be distinguished from a franco-celt, a person of celtic descent who speaks French. Ldjenks 15:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Vinneyt6 21:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
By the way, I see wikipedia is allowing the term anglo-celt, which is increasingly popular in Australia. Either both terms should be permitted or deleted as cultural referents. Ldjenks 17:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I need to make a wee clarification. The Anglo-Celt as it refers to Australians is discussed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons Ldjenks 22:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 22:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
You are truly not being clear enough about why you are so hostile to anglo/saxon. It seems to me that your views have a political base; I WANT to hear them, because I am also interested in the anglo-celtic term, but I would prefer anglo-celt. You have to understand that anglo/saxon is a very well known term in Canada. What's wrong with it...and give me a well thought out, researched response along with your political views. I would like to hear both. I am probably going to start up a web page in Canada, and I need to coin a good term that works for us, but that also won't start a war of words throughout the former colonies and the UK and Ireland....As an aside, Germanics also massively settled in North America. At one time the USA debated adopting German as the official language. So perhaps that move in the USA to designate 'anglo-celts' was a response to the huge influence of Germanic populations in North American. But to tell you the truth, there has been so much intermarriage that anglo/saxon/celt seems most appropriate for North American descendents of the UK and Ireland these days. Ldjenks 14:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Alun, I went to anglo-celtic.org.uk, and I would like to speak with the people who created the site, but they list no contact. How do I get in touch with them? I do wish you would truthfully tell me why you don't like the "saxon" word. Hopefully they will. I don't want to start up a web page until the name issues are settled. And you have to admit that anglo/saxon/celt is seeing growth on the Internet.
I'm relieved to see this anglo-celtic.org.uk page. I'ts time for reconciliation in the UK and Ireland, because the strife has hurt the descendents of the former colonists as well. But why anglo-celtic.org.uk and not anglo-celt.org.uk....why the "ic" on celtic? Ldjenks 16:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Alun, if you give me an email address I can send you a file that will give you information about Canada that will likely rock your world. The file is circulating all over in Canada. It`s a pdf and takes about 900 k of space. Then maybe you will understand better the kinds of grassroots movements that are taking place in Canada, and maybe better understand why, worlwide, the descendents of the colonists are seeking unity. You can send me an email contact for you to lyjinx@hotmail.com. LDJenks
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.165.175.139 ( talk • contribs)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sl 1986 ( talk • contribs)
and the (WWV) is.... Weera Wickrama Vibhushanaya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sl 1986 ( talk • contribs)
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
It seems not notable, it's just a gravel pit and a place for trains to pass each other. Awiseman 18:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. Merge may be undertaken once content is translated. Xoloz 17:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability not established. Not in English - Nv8200p talk 18:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
page smacks of original research.-- Syrthiss 18:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete G7, author request. NawlinWiki 20:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Spam/Non-notable person. The UK's leading parent coach only gets a dozen or so ghits? Dipics 18:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. There really was no assertion of notability. Article name-drops names of notable bands who've had an influence on this independent artiste, as well as notable genres that he likes, but he hasn't released a full album yet (only a single), nor is he said to be particularly notable in any genre. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 23:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:MUSIC - CrazyRussian talk/ email 18:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a fictional person. One of the links given doesn't work; the other does not mention this performer. Cannot find any other references to this person, let alone as a porn star.— Chidom talk 17:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 12:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable person. Was going to prod but noticed in history that it had been prodded and prod removed on August 21. No attempt to follow WP:V or to add any information to suggest notability. GBYork 19:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The argument that this text is largely original research is unrebutted. I will userfy content for anyone who will work to provide reliable sources for it. Xoloz 17:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is entirely original research. As the lead of the article states, it is a term used by fans to describe the various levels of "truth". Its essentially unverifiable speculation on which Dragon Ball series are more authoritative to the overall story line. There's no information here thats usable that isn't already in other Dragon Ball articles. Also, there are, of course, no reliable sources. Delete as unverifiable original research. Wickethewok 19:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Bobet 16:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete Reason...Clearly a vanity article created by this person or his art dealer for marketing or publicity purposes. Not noteworthy.
TomPeters 19:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Nominator has made 13 edits, 7 of them for this AfD.
Tyrenius 04:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
This has been listed on
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts.
Tyrenius 04:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity page about someone's fanfic. Google hits return nothing. Would have prodded, but anon made that impossible.
The result was speedy delete CSD A1 - the title asks the question, but the article never provides the answer. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 23:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and probably non-notable. (I think this is a pokemon-related topic, but it's rather hard to tell. The article doesn't make any sense to me.) → smably 19:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:WEB. NN Pokecruft site. Delete. exolon 19:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete this article. The others mentioned below will have to be either group-nominated or CSD'ed individually to be deleted in line with policy and not to appear arbitrary. (aeropagitica) 12:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
does not assert significance. While obviously tragic, Siam's death is no more significant than the hundreds of children killed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since the last intifada began in 2000. Pan Dan 19:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I see that user Alberuni has created many articles each devoted entirely to a Palestinian child victim of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Examples include Rania Iyad Aram, Iman Darweesh Al Hams, and Ghadeer Jaber Mkheemar. While every death is tragic, it is ridiculous to have a wikipedia article devoted to each one. Perhaps a list of child victims of the Israel-Palestinian conflict, or something like that, could be created instead of one article per child. Pan Dan 20:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
(As I am a newly registered user, and Alberuni's talk page is protected, I am not able to notify him/her that the article he/she created is being considered for deletion. Maybe a kind passerby will do that for me. Thanks.) Pan Dan 20:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Corpobabble roll call: "powerful framework", "fully-conceptualized product", "seamless integration", "robust, event-based", "Intuitive user interfaces", "leverages intellectual assets" -- yep, all here. Nonnotable software and company -- also nominating TechExcel. NawlinWiki 20:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted as per consensus. WP:IAR ON WHEELS!!!. Garrett Talk 21:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Article is WP:OR, And wikipedia is not a computer game walkthrough site. Geoffrey Spear 20:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails to meet notability standards on WP:MUSIC, probable vanity page. -- Maestlin 20:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There are already articles on both Thomas Paine and Common Sense. This is a personal essay not an encyclopedia article.-- NHSavage 20:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete by Doc glasgow - (aye, right).-- Andeh 20:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT refers - OK it exists but it is not encyclopaedic. Strong Delete. BlueValour 20:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person as per WP:BIO Valrith 20:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Completely fan-made, unverifiable, unimportant, and overall useless information. I also nominate its redirects Armageddon fist, Grand Calamity Symphony, and Grand calamity symphony. Note: This debate has been added to the list of Final Fantasy deletions. Hibana 20:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 23:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Advertisement, fails WP:CORP, no sources given or likely to be found. Prod contested by anon. Delete -- Huon 20:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable subject. This is the only album by a rock group that lacks its own article on Wikipedia. -- Maestlin 20:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band, fails WP:BAND, only assertions of notability are "4 top 20 hits on P-1 radio" (whatever that is) and "a number 1 album on Billboard regionally". No sources given or likely to be found. Prod contested by author. Delete -- Huon 21:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
In my opinion, does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (web) Tivedshambo ( talk) 21:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
^ Delete about 700 google hits. no google news hits. :) Dlohcierekim 01:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn/merge. -- wwwwolf ( barks/ growls) 15:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod/Unprod so I'm taking this to the community. I'm claiming deletion under notability for this article. I could maybe see a reason for keep if this character was in a popular, current, franchise, but it has been 14 years since this character was in game. -- Mitaphane talk 21:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as a non-notable advert/neologism. (aeropagitica) 11:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Started out as a subtle advertisement, now just a low-content, non-notable neologism OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 01:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Not really an article. No context of why this is notable - Nv8200p talk 21:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer D iablo 14:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Strong Delete, this is an utterly non-notable computer package. It is used by Wikipedia editors (including me). However, noone else uses it or has commented on it. Nilfanion ( talk) 21:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Would not pass the proposed WP:PORN BIO or a Japanese equivalent, having no notable awards in Japan, or notable mainstream work, notable magazine appearances, etc etc. Delete. --- Hong Qi Gong 21:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer D iablo 20:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Until this guy actually has released the movie this is pure crystalballism. Pascal.Tesson 21:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
No links to it. Does not seem notable. Delete. Green caterpillar 21:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a copyvio from the website. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
NN Computerjoe 's talk 21:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company's vanity/blatant spam DMacks 21:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Fail WP:CORP, WP:NFT, WP:VAIN etc. etc. Geoffrey Spear 21:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted by NawlinWiki. W.marsh 22:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Seems like a vanity page. Delete. Green caterpillar 21:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Listcruft, anyone? This article serves no useful encyclopedic purpose, and is completely unreferenced. This doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Mysekurity 21:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
The result was keep. VoiceOfReason 17:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Suggest that company does not meet Notability Criteria for companies and corporations. Article has persisted in a grossly NPOV state for some time. Representatives of the company itself have moved in on article, instituted a blatantly ad-like tone, and stymied neutralizing efforts. Anazgnos 21:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable article.if we had a page for every type of spoiler,we would have waay to many articles. User:The pink panther22:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The subject of the entry in question is only notable for a brief appearance in the "Beyond the Mat" documentary and Fancruft that has sprung up in the past several months. Seeing as how the page seems to solely exist for this purpose, and that his work alone would not be notable enough to justify an entry, I think it should be considered for deletion. Thoughts? Deputy Marshall 22:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Now I'm being censored. Freedom of Speech. First Amendment. These fascists are ruining this site, and this great nation. LIBERTY FOR STAMP!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.114.247.64 ( talk • contribs)
The result was flagged as copyvio. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 23:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity page. "Sleeping States" Starkie gets 45 G-hits. Morgan Wick 22:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Project is non-notable, and article also fails to mention notability. I'm not familiar with any of this type of stuff, so I'm looking for a second opinion. -- Nishkid64 23:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete by Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh under CSD G7
Nonnotable band. I changed the speedy tag to a prod to give the author an opportunity to provide sources; the sources provided are all links on the band's own website. NawlinWiki 23:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of this AfD was delete. It was deleted before the AfD finished out. -- Nishkid64 00:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I googled "Robrindra" and got 6 hits, none of which correspond to this disease. I went to Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Missing diseases/9 and found nothing there titled "Robrindra" or something close to that nature. I believe it's a hoax based on the information in the article, such as it saying that Arthur Russell died of Robrinda when he really died of AIDS. -- Nishkid64 23:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP. Orphaned. Original author linkspammed two other articles ( [38] [39]) with a link to the company (with a suspiciously "information" URL for each). JS talk 23:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP and seems to be written in vain. Creator of the article is User:Centauricom -- Nishkid64 23:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus/default keep. Closure is mildly influenced by misuse of the word "infinitesimal." I believe the nominator meant "potentially infinite", which is usually expressed at AfD with word "unmaintainable". Xoloz 17:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Dynamiclist, infinitesimal. (Actually, it has no encyclopædic value.) TrackerTV ( CW| Castform| Green Valley) 23:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by GIen. -- Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I don't think everything that exists should have an article, but I'm not sure if this is a very notable term in the business world. -- Nishkid64 23:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete by User:CanadianCaesar as empty. TimBentley (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
This empty page conflates the names of two important Queens of Swaziland who ruled as regents. Tsandzile Ndwandwe (siSwati spelling; Thandile is isiZulu) was the mother of Mswati II & was regent in the late 1830s. Labotsibeni (Gwamile) Mdluli was the mother of Sobhuza II & was regent from 1899 to 1922 i.e. the first decades of British colonization. See e.g. Hilda Kuper, An African Aristocracy (NY: Africana Publishing Co., 1980 [reprint 1947 ed.]. The conflation may pose problems for work I want to do on various Swaziland related articles. Ngwe 00:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete Mhiji 00:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC) reply
reads like a resume, questioning notability, but I see that the article is created by a well-established Wikipedian. Not sure what the /temp part is in the title. If this is being built, doesn't it belong in the User space instead of the main space? -- CPAScott 14:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Bizarre adventure. The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.
Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. jp× g 07:28, 18 October 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply
We already have the identical List of Roma people. Mad Jack 02:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus ( Liberatore, 2006). 17:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
some original research, content better suited for a fansite, not appropriate for an encyclopedia. WP:NOT-- Philo 07:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
* Keep, but rewrite
NoelleWiley 18:58, 31 August 2006 Note: user's only edits are to AFD's, registered 2 days ago.
[1]
Comment Do you want to prove every detail that appears on that page? I think that's a bad idea and what I read was true. Or do you want to prove the fact that the St. Jefferson Credit Union completed it's work between 1998 and 2001? ProSieben 13:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I understand your interest of providing a timeline of events in the canon, but the current format of the article is just restrictive and narrow in scope, hence my initial recommendation to have the entire article rewritten with a proper encyclopedia format (but with some designs elements based on the current revision). ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 09:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) ╫ reply
On the other hand, it has been noticed that substantial amounts of plot summaries were provided in most of the series' character listings; making them hard to track, find and piece together in those pages. It would have been a good idea to move much of these information into a dedicated article, providing easy readability of detailed plot summaries. I have also picked up a long addition in Grand Theft Auto (series) [2] that contains the storyline in the entire series in the form of prose (although it needs work). Merging any of the abovementioned bodies of text into this article would technically categorize it as part of a GTA article series. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 09:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) ╫ reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
No sources, basically no wf'cation, no cats, extremely POV title with abbreviations, just an odd article. Added to numerous "DVD" sections of the so-called "affected" show's articles. Staxringold talk contribs 02:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
More from my webcomic nn watchlist is Slightly damned, found here. There are 150 links for "Slightly damned" although none of these are from anything approaching a reliable source, and quite a few of them are irrelevent to the subject. This is not notable, I doubt the entire art site http://www.raizap.com/ would pass WP:WEB let alone one of its webcomics. - Hahnch e n 00:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Another webcomic article which just chronicles what it's about without actually telling us why anyone should care. You can see the comic here although there are numerous links within the article itself. The website manages an Alexa rank of 2 million and the name of the website "black wave rising" generates 11 Google hits. You can see how notable and popular this website is just by reading the latest news post where it encourages everyone to vote every day on various topsites so it can make it into the top 100. - Hahnch e n 00:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable webcomic, found here on the comic genesis free web host. Probably written by the webcomic author User:Kichi-Kuro and one of her associates a User:Noriko Kuro. No assertion of notability in the article, 8 members in their forum and manages 17 Google hits for "Project Jyuunishi". - Hahnch e n 00:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod removed without comment. Simply not notable. Delete. BlueValour 00:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Bobet 15:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Protologism, google hits on this link back to this article or aren't about this at all. So, fails Wikipedia:Verifiability, among other things Xyzzyplugh 00:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested speedy; seems like a nonnotable band to me but author made arguments for notability on the article's talk page, so I'm moving it here. NawlinWiki 00:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. `' mikka (t) 01:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
From the article "it has never been linked with any modern river." In other words, it is unverified as having existed, and assuming fictionality for now, it is not noteable beyond this one reference. Blood red sandman 01:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Thanks for keeping it! Solar Apex ( talk) 05:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
del Wikipedia is not genealogy. A thoroughly nonnotable surname, on the first glance. `' mikka (t) 01:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Sango 123 01:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Also listing the following articles:
Advertisements for non-notable companies and the building that houses them, all fail WP:CORP. Structured Training hints at coining the term "structured training", but no evidence of this. -- AbsolutDan (talk) 01:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Unless somebody can prove this article's worth and salvage it, it would not seem to be an important topic and should be deleted. Also, the person seems to have created it for themself and it does not seem to be worth fixing and maintaining such an unimportant article.
queso man 01:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This seems pure vanity and no sources are given. D1Puck1T 01:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
:) Dlohcierekim 12:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable website that does not include any outside sources within the article and generates 8 unique google results. Erechtheus 01:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This page, as well as its duplicate at Core-b, appears to be a neologism referring to a specific group of people. The current version doesn't refer to the people per se, but a look at previous edits will suggest that it's about a small group. Either way, I find zero Google hits for "Core Bevarsu," and am led to believe this is a non-notable neologism. Delete both. (I should note that a PROD tag was removed from Core B, precipitating this AfD.) Tony Fox (arf!) 02:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. - Mailer D iablo 22:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Advertisement, fails WP:CORP, non-NPOV. Prod deleted by original author. Author appears to be from the company itself and using this article as an advertisement (also has warning on user page). Orphaned. Edits by user appear to be malicious, as well. -- JS talk 01:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. --- Deville ( Talk) 21:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
NN Not notable-organization (speedy was contested)
abakharev 02:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Weak Keep Company does not appear to be particularly notable, but the film series it distributes in the US is (with it's own WP article). Company does have a IMDB listing. Article appears not to be written by an employee, but a fan. Lots of room for improvement though. Seaphoto 01:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment I haven't heard of the company, but some of the movies they're claimed to be distributing are somewhat infamous, so that may count towards a keep. Mark Grant 02:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Zsinj Talk 00:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research. See Talk:America = 50. Omphaloscope » talk 02:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete by consensus and per article contents. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
NN enough. It was on speedy, but I think it should be discussed abakharev 02:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 21:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable per WP:MUSIC - Nv8200p talk 02:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 14:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
It's a bridge. So what? User:Zoe| (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer D iablo 22:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article, as I've stated again and again, seems to not be so much an encyclopedia article as it is a slight bit of a vanity article by the fans of this website. This website has gained a few awards from a site known as DaFastLane, but I haven't been able to locate any information about DaFastLane on Wikipedia (aside from the article proposed for deletion here) or Google (a few hits), and it isn't listed on Alexa. They won five awards in one year, but that does not yet qualify them for notability under WP:WEB, which no other eligibility requirements are met on either.
Until they win these DaFastLane awards again next year, or until they satisfy the requirements another way, I feel it's safe to say that the article deserves deletion. Sephylight 02:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
For one, those so-called five awards don't belong to Reloaded. They belong mostly to a person, not a site, that person being Kosta, for the work and effort he's put in Abandonia. It's quite pathetic that Reloaded calls his awards as theirs and use them to claim rights on a page on here. The only award that does go to the site, is only a nomination, not an actual award. It needs to be mentioned that for the DaFastLane Awards, anybody can nominate anybody, and the people from Reloaded've all nominated Reloaded for as many things as they could, of which this one got pulled through. Same goes with that "Most helpful scener" award. As Abandonware's spread out over multiple communities, the scener who can have most people vote for him, will win that one, even though I can name ten sceners that're far more helpful, and that's just from one community. The only person that actually's an established value in the scene, is Kosta, who did deserve the awards he got. Those still aren't awards for Reloaded, but for Kosta. In other words, all those so-called awards're self-induced by Reloaded itself, which I don't think will make them count at all.
Another is their so-called claim to be the first site dedicated to freeware games. I don't know where they got that, and everybody knows that's a lie. They even have affiliates on their main page, linking to other freeware sites that've been 'round far longer, so either they don't know their own site or they're lying badly 'bout that.
Yet another thing, which goes hand in hand with the previous part, but seems to've been used as a separate reason, is that they claim that before Reloaded, you had to search the AGS, AGI and Gamemaker communities, and aside from that, using Google. So far, they've pretty much only used the AGS community, so that's been untrue, plus, if they think that's the only way to find freeware games, it just shows the site won't live long enough to become notable, as those that run it show they don't understand what they're focusing on. There are far more ways to get to freeware than just those three, and that's the very basics that should be known to run such a site for a longer period of time.
As far as the notability goes, they have a bit of a point. I know some of my friends know that site, and I know a few freeware game developers that've been in touch with them, and they all think the site provides lowest-quality information (up to the point that some games' information's all in Engrish) and's generally an insult to both the developers as to the games themselves, so they do know the site, but prefer to stay as far away from it as possible. Also, those freeware game developers they did get in touch with, were mostly, if not all, brought in touch with that site by a member they kicked out a long time ago, and although they haven't been in touch with any of those freeware developers, they do seem to claim his work as theirs whenever they can.
Another thing you can notice if you dig around on their and Abandonia's forums, is that they have a high tendency to mob whenever something or somebody has an opinion that goes against them. It's already happening on here, and you can be sure they'll bring more of their croonies in to increase the number of people that back their view up, but always just say the same thing (like Deathdude). So be aware of that. You might see five-six voices here, but they're still just one and a couple of puppets. -- 195.144.90.5 13:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I see that I have to both apologize and clarify my earlier statement. (Hopefully without going too far of topic from the discussion at hand). When I said that "Another point is that there wasn't really a Freeware center, before AR was created." and "AR is truly the first site to gather all freeware games on one site, regardless of age, engine and genre." I did not mean that AR was the very first freeware site to have been created. Far from it. What I meant was that AR is the most notable of the lot. If you do a quick Alexa ranking with other sites, you'll find that no-one is ranked as high as AR. (Apart from HOTU, but that isn't a freeware only dedicated site. It just have a lot of freeware games thrown into the mix).
For instance, www.BigBlueCup.com (The AGS official homepage) has an Alexa rating of 120 353, yet is has a Wikipedia page of its own.
There is no doubt that AGS deserves the page, but from a purely Alexa statistical point of view, AR should deserve it more. So, just having a good Alexa ranking should not be the only criteria for an Wikipedia article (as there would be no discussion whether AR deserved it or not, then), but in my mind in order to deserve an article, the site should offer something that no-one else does, and that makes it unique.
In AR's case, this uniqueness is found in the effort placed into each single update,
the interviews with the makers, the diversity of games hosted (in terms of engine and genres)
and the banners made for the games. I know that there is an overload of adventure games on the site, and we are trying to fix that. However, as AR is a community driven project, we showcase what people review. As long as we get in more adventure games, than other games - we will continue to put out more adventures.
If you take a look at the forum topic in which we ask the public for help ( http://www.reloaded.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=116 ), you will see that the number of Adventure games on that list is very small in comparrison to the other genres. (If the above link is against the rules of this discussion, then I apologize, and a mod should feel free to edit it away). So, in conclusion, I apologize for the above statements that might have been confusing, but I hope that I have managed to get across my views for why I believe that AR deserves an article of its own (and not just be merged with Abandonia). Tom Henrik 14:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable site fails WP:WEB, Alexa rank is 1,440,263... the highest I've ever seen VoiceOfReason 02:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete Since the previous "no consensus" AFD nomination the notability of this webcomics is still close to none. What is more, it looks like it is dead since February. I previously voted to merge/redirect, because of some cultural curiosity, but now my opinion swayed. Mukadderat 02:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer D iablo 22:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
While notable, this article is unable to meet both WP:V and WP:BLP simultaneously, due to the only legitimate reference available being a violation of the subject's privacy. Nomination from the article's original author. kotra 02:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable non-professional cricket club with non-notable players (none have articles -- the seemingly valid links are all for other persons). There are no Google results for the name of the club and the city. Erechtheus 03:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Tricky case. Supposedly a Soviet missile project that never reached the prototype stage; initially, that seems fairly plausible. I got halfway through cleaning it up before I checked for external sources, and found nothing, via either google or JSTOR, for L231d or L230, that related even remotely to russian missiles. Furthermore, the article's creator (or at least his IP) signed as "L231d" on a talk page comment, and on his talk page there's evidence that something he created was deleted as nonsense. So, all told, I'm thinking hoax, but I'm not quite confident enough to kill it quietly with a prod tag. Thoughts? -- Robth Talk 03:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete unless it can be verified. Heimstern Läufer 20:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per Heimstern Läufer and Robth. -Chelsea reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Taxonomy is nonsense, appears unrecognized by any recent authority. Dysmorodrepanis 22:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) reply
There is no such thing as a Californian falcon as far as I know. Besides, one of the two (!) binomial names given for it is that of the Peregrine Falcon. pointless 12:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Some sort of POV essay or copy-paste junk. It makes some sense here and there, but is entirely unencyclopedic. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. - Mailer D iablo 22:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not Notable; this is a local radio show, it's been on the air for about 2 months; as far as I can tell, the article makes no particular claim of notability. Wikipedia does have some articles on particular modern radio shows, but in general they seem to make claims to being particularly notable. I don't think we want an article on every show at every radio station. Brianyoumans 03:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
"Keep". Many local non-syndicated radio shows have Wikipedia entries including Kevin and Bean, Kidd Chris, and The Doghouse with JV and Elvis. Apparently their ratings in Boston do indeed show that they are "notable". The show is known for many national things such as the aforementioned feud with Kevin Smith, and Rich disrupting Martha Burk's protest at the Masters which was covered by every major network and spawned an ESPN Sportscenter catchphrase.
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. My heart was telling me "don't delete" but my head said otherwise and it won. WUUUUU!!!!!!!! Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person (fails WP:BIO). 1 Google hit. Erechtheus 03:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sango 123 02:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Totally contextless, doubtful that it's not a copy/paste from the named source, but I cannot confirm. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The article was written by myself as a general summary of two books I have written on the regiment. I have researched it for five years, so I think I know its history. Hopkins is public domain. Also included are more journals and letters then one can count.
The result was delete. Sango 123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
[Check Google hits]; 0 of them. I can't tell if this is a neologism, a non-notable design of a product, or whatever else, but my gut tells me it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, at least not yet. (|-- UlTiMuS 04:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted per article author. Syrthiss 21:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Pretty obviously a joke page. Placed a prod on it and notified the author, but the prod was removed by an IP. Nscheffey( T/ C) 04:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Tram stops are, well, tram stops. Except when they happen to be a station they are generally indistinguishable from bus stops. Unless there is something notable about a particular tram stop I don't see the point or need for an article especially since all the information is already in the main article Midland Metro. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. This is a multinomination for deletion of all tram stop articles in Category:Midland Metro stops excepting, of course, the stations (Snow Hill, Jewellery Quarter and Hawthornes). Delete all. BlueValour 04:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted, poorly-worded ad-like blurb for a doubtful product. If it is to be mentioned at all do that in the existing article. I really can't see leaving this to run its week. Garrett Talk 21:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, for some reason. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. No sources, no verifiability, and poorly written to boot. VoiceOfReason 04:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sango 123 02:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Apperently a young rapper, includes no real claim to notability, no chart posistions, admits no full album yet, the two sources are an AOL Music page and his myspace. - M ask 04:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 08:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Google hits: Logical UNifier of Extensive Transfer Arrays and LUNETA; neither are promising. Seems like NN techcruft. (|-- UlTiMuS 05:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 08:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO. If he were "famous", he would get hits on Google. He gets none (per User:IceCreamAntisocial). -- Omicronpersei8 ( talk) 05:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
-- why does it matter if he has a google page or not? all i need to do to get on google is make a stupid webpage somewhere with my name all over it. i support this article because john tridel is a lyrical genius (he talks about the CHURCH AND STATE FOOLS) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.126.198.126 ( talk • contribs) 04:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sango 123 02:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fancruft; Do we really need a list like this? Would anyone ever use it? (|-- UlTiMuS 05:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The keep arguments are quite poor, and are provided by WP:SPU's for the most part. Xoloz 17:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
A punk house in, well, I guess somewhere near Langley. No notability asserted, unless the claim that it is haunted can be sourced. Prod was removed without comment. ~ trialsanderrors 05:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
http://discorder.ca/2006/09/vancouver-alf-house-on-east-georgia/
0
The result was Speedy Delete. Robdurbar 10:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is completely unnecessary in light of the article at The Cheetah Girls 2 that featured much of the information here prior to the creation of this article. I have added the information in this page to the main article; now all that needs to happen is for this one to go away. Erechtheus 05:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep & move. Sango 123 02:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
As with many list articles, this article has both original research and neutral point of view issues. They are clearly present in this article due to the awkward explanation of Michael Keaton's character's inclusion from Multiplicity. Erechtheus 05:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Rescued from speedy delete, but notability highly questionable. Yes they had four records, but Taang! Records appears to be a storefront operation, while Musical Tragedies/Toxic Shock has no Google presence at all. "[B]eing proud to be fat, drunk, and stupid" does not, even in these benighted times, guarantee stardom. I hope. If the closing admin determines that Western Civilization can survive without this article, note that their albums and EPs have articles too, and this is a multiple nomination including those articles also. Herostratus 06:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete both. Sango 123 02:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn company. Xi95 06:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Addition - I have added the owner of Linearstone, Glenn Herrin, to this AFD. The two articles have the same author (who has done no other edits). -- Brianyoumans 07:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The article is unsourced, not well-written, and even the keep comments here are weak ones. This subject may be notable, but this article is of no help to anyone. Good subject for a history restore once a decent article is written, however. Xoloz 17:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website Xi95 06:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:V and doesn't prove notability. Considered this a redirect candidate; however, there are only 10Ghits including Wikipedia, and the link to the Japanese page is to the Ken Kitashiba article, not a "Duke Kita" article. The Ken Kitashiba article on the JA Wikipedia then links back to this article on the English site as proof that his nickname is Duke Kita. Dekimasu 06:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 23:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Apparently non-notable academic who fails WP:PROF. I cannot find from independent sources any biography of him, or anything that suggest that the books he has authored are well-known or significant. Kimchi.sg 01:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Initially nominated for deletion on 19 August 2006. Relisted here for further consensus. Thanks.-- Samir धर्म 07:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete, no notability claimed, vanity, unverifiable. NawlinWiki 17:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Totally unverifiable (see edit summary), and with only seven ghits, none of which are proper articles regarding him. David Mestel( Talk) 07:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a single statement in the article is sourced. The article is highly unencyclopedic .It is essentially just a propaganda piece and has the tone and suggestion of a leaflet disseminated by SMSM's followers. At best, there should be a complete rewrite. At worst, a complete deletion. Hkelkar 07:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Neologism with extremely narrow scope (per User:Ultimus). -- Omicronpersei8 ( talk) 07:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There are other Fiesta del Sol's that may meet notability standards, but not this one, so the recommendation is delete or merge. The festival again this summmer did not go down, due to lack of corporate sponsorship, a google search of "fiesta del sol ontario" found little else except a cancellation notice. It has no apparent historical value or mention, either in the article, or that could be sourced, other than how long it has gone on. If historical value can be found, and it can be differentiated from the "Chicago" Fiesta del Sol, then will reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmaguir1 ( talk • contribs) 2006-08-29 07:59:04
The result was speedy delete as blatant self-admitted hoax. Why bother keeping a page with choice snippets like these (for the benefit of non-admins):
and last but not least,
Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Suspected hoax, Google gives no hits on this name. The person seems to be made up by the creator. -- TexMurphy 08:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete and redirect to emoticon. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Complete nonsense, was tagged for Speedy deletion, but tag was removed, therefore listing here. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 08:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. Interested editor may merge from history as warranted. Xoloz 17:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Poorly written, badly sourced tripe... absolutely no notably anywhere on the page--didn't see much of any sort anywhere, conferences are notoriously NOT notable, will change if evidence given on page... and by evidence, I do NOT mean a local news network running a segment, see talk page for notability questions —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kmaguir1 ( talk • contribs) .
Also, further evidence of notability - this is CNN coverage [21]. So, the conference was newsworthy, by wiki criteria, it should be included! 137.205.132.170 10:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT for things made up in school one day, as evidenced by the fact that none of the first page of ghits refers to it in this context. David Mestel( Talk) 08:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted. kingboyk 09:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
nn, 0 ghits. David Mestel( Talk) 08:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted. Seems to be sockpuppets working together to create nonsense == vandalism. kingboyk 08:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
A hoax. No Google hits for "Evan Jonathan Wright", "“Muffenta", or "“Bisqueten". GregorB 08:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sango 123 01:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
A band, album and song. Questionable compliance with WP:MUSIC:
Previous nomination - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateur Transplants (no consensus). kingboyk 08:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod removed by author; I stand by my original claim that this is a NN, unverifiable neologism, unacceptable per WP:NEO. Delete (|-- UlTiMuS 08:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
advertisement/vanity & not notable; prod on 8th July was removed. Marasmusine 09:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The article doesn't distinguish it from any other lab in a university. If it really "does in fact have a creditable history", someone can rewrite the article and tell it. - Bobet 13:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. A university research group with no notability of its own. Nuttah68 09:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I would have to beg the differ. This is indeed a UC Berkeley lab. And this lab does in fact have a creditable history, and is worthy of a wiki-page.
The result was keep. - Bobet 15:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result wasspeedy deleted as a copyvio and (even with permission) pretty much contextless etc. -- wwwwolf ( barks/ growls) 12:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
There are two problems here:
The result was keep. Please defer merge discussions to the article talk page. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn group. Ghoe 09:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete. --- GIen 10:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
nn companies. and Japanese WIkipedia article as delete. see ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/ウィキペディア_(会社) Ghoe 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website. Ghoe 10:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all three. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article and the related articles on Dominic Joutsen and Alexey Zimakov. All three are creations of User:Joutsen (note that the name indicates possible vanity. The three articles are ridiculously promotional in tone. Moreover, the content seems pretty much unverifiable, although one would have to conduct a russian-search in cyrillic to be sure. I believe that all three fail WP:BIO. The total number of unique Ghits for "alexey Zimakov" for instance is 9 [22]. Only two of these are not wikipedia mirrors. You find another 11 for the spelling "alexei Zimakov". Joutsen gets 23 unique Ghits [23] and it seems all are either listings or mp3 download sites where anyone can upload. 10 uniques hits for "Edward Mekhraliev" [24] one of which explaining that he is currently Joutsen's boss! Pascal.Tesson 10:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was train wreck. As has been expressed by many, many people here, nothing good is going to come from this nomination. This closure is not a judgement for or against any one article, please re-list seperately where appropriate. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Reality TV show cruft, not notable outside TV show. MER-C 10:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Also nominated for the same reason are:
It is noted in previous AFDs that reality TV contestants generally aren't notable unless they come close to winning the show. Many of these do not assert notability under WP:BIO. MER-C 11:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Alternative to a mass delete
I would suggest keep on at least those two. I admit some of the articles are a bit excessive, though. Fabricationary 04:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Short entry on a completely unremarkable K12 school, one of the apparently 105,000 K12 schools in the USA alone [25]. Having an article for each and every one of them would make Wikipedia truly an indiscriminate collection of information. Fram 11:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep (and copyedit). Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Ooooh, controversy surrounding SpongeBob SquarePants! Has he been seeing some comely mermaid wench on the side? Does the show carry Satanic messages? Er, no. Actually this is more or less made up, as is evident from the unreliability ofthe sources. Only one item is properly sourced (if you allow Snopes as a reliable source), and there is more then enough room for that short sentence in the main article. Seriously, there is no significant controversy surrounding the rectangular yellow one. Just zis Guy you know? 11:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Allow me some explanation, as this page does not convey it very well. The article is an essay comparing and contrasting Locke and Demosthenes in comparison to Peter and Valentine Wiggen, two characters in the novel Ender's Game. They took the two respective names as pseudonyms to write politics. Its all nice and rosy, except its very much original research. In fact it exemplifes original research in the highest degree through a comparative essay by the page's two authors. I like the book and its sequels very much, but wikipedia is not the place for personal essays. -- Kevin_b_er 02:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable website, failing web notability (hasn't been featured in important media, hasn't won a well known and independent award, neither is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators). Alexa rank of 304,480, forum with 401 members, notability claim is that they are currently translating a game, Mother 3. Site is fairly empty (Download and Tutorials sections are empty), with few links. Deprodded without comment. [29] -- ReyBrujo 04:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 23:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination: Not the best of articles. It lacks in formatting, but that's not reason enough to speedy as the tagger suggested. Based on the YouTube link provided, this person appears to have been part of one or more televised martial arts matches. Makes him notable enough for me. Looking for community opinion before I remove any deletion tags. I suggest Keep. - Mgm| (talk) 11:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep(Provisionally) Its a fan base article - a 9-3 record does not make you the greatest grappler ever known even if you took out Royce. Still if it could be just fleshed out a bit - where he's from, when he was born, something - then it would have some value. Among the BJJ crowd taking out a Gracie is notable. As it stands its a piece of fluff. Peter Rehse 06:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Was tagged as a speedy, but article claimed the band has an EP. Nomination, no vote. - Mgm| (talk) 12:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 21:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There is not any content that would not fit in each movie's article. Not to mention most of the text on the page is verbatim in each movie's own article. Also, there is already a mention of the series at Living Dead. Joltman 12:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 21:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Advertisement. Fails WP:CORP. Pascal.Tesson 12:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 18:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Blatant advertisement for non-notable company, no sign of satisfying WP:CORP criteria. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. The article read: '''Hajieg Agha Khanum''' was the mother of [[Ayatollah Khomeini]]. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
There are 2 problems.
The result was Keep and rename to Marriage websites as matrimony refers to the Catholic marriage on WP and this article does not appear to be restricted to one faith alone. Marriage is the wider term for the union of two people in secular and religious practices, so it appears to be more appropriate for this article. (aeropagitica) 17:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Very narrow towards two sites in India, and may also be WP:SPAM (Not 100% sure on that though). Michael Billington ( talk • contribs) 12:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
*Delete - per nom. Most of the article is OR ("Believed to be a more serious venue", "Leading matrimonials sites.."). Not encyclopedic. -
Aksi_great (
talk -
review me) 12:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Change to keep per great work by Uncle G. But needs rewrite. -
Aksi_great (
talk -
review me) 12:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Being a professor at a private school is not inherently notable. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Average college professor. Has been tagged for notability for quite a while now. Fails WP:BIO. Pascal.Tesson 12:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 17:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Speedy was denied since members of this band have been involved in more notable bands although a "three month stint with Good Charlotte" is a bit weak... I believe this group fails WP:MUSIC. Pascal.Tesson 12:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
While I appreciate this may at first sound noteworthy, there are a surprising number of these so-called 'minor planets' (e.g. big asteroids) in our solar system. Just because Pluto is now one of them does not make them all noteable. delete as a NN rock. Blood red sandman 12:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer D iablo 20:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Subject is not notable enough for its own entry; description of character already exists at List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch. -- Merope 12:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable per WP:BIO; 3 Google results. Jim Backus Goes Bowling (which was previously listed under the subject's Filmography) is currently up for deletion. Prod tag removed by anon. ... discospinster talk 13:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not Suited for an Encyclopedia - Irrelevant. Refers to a "scam" on eBay.. Boochan 13:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I believe this band fails WP:MUSIC. Its only claim to notability is that their music was played in various talk shows, of which there is no source, making it unverifiable, and that they won it was nominated for the 16th Annual San Diego Music Awards of 2006, which is a local competition (and they didn't win.) The creator's only edits are to this article, and removed the prod without comment. Placing Def league up as well as a redirect. ColourBurst 14:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Bloor-Danforth (TTC). - Bobet 15:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
DeleteMerge - Station doesn't exist, nor is it planed, proposed, or under consideration - it's a fantasy
Nfitz 14:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was DELETE. Vociferousness of argument does not equal strength of argument. The raw vote total was 12-6 Delete, on top of which the Delete side had much the stronger arguments. Let us all recall that Wikipedia is basically a tool for scholarship, education, and research. No evidence has been presented that inclusion of this article would markedly enhance the encyclopedia. It appears from the one of the stronger Keep arguments is that she appears in her own frequently-aired TV commercials. As one contributor commented, "I have seen her commercials on TV all the time, she is very notable." That is not a strong argument. The remainder of the Keep arguments are not much stronger. Herostratus 03:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply
NOTE: It now comes to my attention that this AfD had been spammed trolling for Delete votes. These votes would not have changed my decision (which is mostly based on strength of arguments) but they did change the raw vote totals. If this AfD close is brought to deletion review, commentors might want to take notice of the tainted nature of the discussion. Herostratus 03:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This article, under its previous title "Roni Deutch" was deleted through this AfD. A DRV consensus overturned this deletion in light of new information, and directed the move to the new, full name. Please consult the DRV for the new evidence before commenting here. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 15:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
YOUR MONEY Pacific Business Services Inc. will present a free seminar on Living Trusts at 10 a.m., 1 p.m., 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday. Speakers will be lawyer Roni Deutch and tax specialist Stan Unruh. Information: 431-0381. * Stephen E. Prout, a certified financial planner, and Richard E. Hemb, a lawyer, will present a free Living Trust Seminar sponsored by Smart Trust Advisors at 10 a.m., 2 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday at Smuggler's Inn, 3737 N. Blackstone Ave. * Pamela Catling, a certified...
YOUR MONEY The first in a series of money management workshops sponsored by the American Association of Retired Persons and the University of California Cooperative Extension will be held 6-8 p.m. Tuesday in the College Community Congregational Church, 5550 N. Fresno St.* A free seminar on Living Trusts will be presented by Pacific Business Services Inc. at 10 a.m., 1 p.m., 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Thursday. The speakers will be Roni Deutch, a lawyer, and Stan Unruh, a tax specialist. Information:...
YOUR MONEY A free seminar on Women Inheriting Investment Responsibilities will be presented at 10 a.m. Tuesday in the Merrill Lynch office at 5260 N. Palm Ave., Suite 100 by Dick Powell and Pete Baumstark, financial consultants; Kevin Gunner, a lawyer, and James E. Cornwell, a chartered life underwriter.A luncheon will follow at D'Mils restaurant. For reservations: 436-3323. * Pacific Business Services Inc. will sponsor free seminars on Living Trusts at 2-4 p.m. and 6:45-8:45 p.m....
Corner to see shops, offices Complex will spruce up Watt and Myrtle in North Highlands. A $4 million office and retail complex that will house a law firm which represents taxpayers having problems with the Internal Revenue Service is taking shape at a key North Highlands intersection. Sacramento County Supervisor Roger Dickinson said the complex demonstrates the "new level of energy and vitality we are seeing along Watt Avenue." Construction has already started on a two-story, 20,000- square-foot office building and 4,500 square feet of...
YOUR MONEY College Planning Services of Fresno will sponsor a free seminar for parents needing Money for Children's College Education at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Ramada Inn. Terry Wilfong will be the speaker. Information and reservations: 228-8051.* Richard D. Moore and Rick R. Staggs, certified financial planners, will give an introductory class called The One-Hour Financial Manager from 10 to 0 a.m. and 7:30 to 9 p.m. Tuesday. Information and reservations: 227-0704. * Carole R. Ford, a...
FENDICK REPEATS STUNNING PERFORMANCE Stanford's Patty Fendick shocked top-seeded Caroline Kuhlman of Southern Cal for the second time in three days, handing her a 6-4, 6-4 loss Wednesday in the quarterfinals of the NCAA women's individual tennis championships in Austin, Texas.On Monday, Fendick snapped Kuhlman's 30-match win streak 7-5, 6-2 during the team championship. The Cardinal won the team title. On Wednesday, Fendick went up 2-0 in the first set and never allowed the USC sophomore to...
'DOGS NAMED NCAA SOFTBALL REGIONAL HOSTS NORPAC HONORS PARRENT, WRIGHT The good news came right on schedule Monday for Fresno State University's softball team. The Bulldogs are in the NCAA postseason tournament, and they're taking the NorPac Conference's top award winners, pitcher Melanie Parrent and Coach Margie Wright, with them. FSU was awarded an at-large bid and, better yet, assigned to host the Northwest Regional at Bulldog Diamond this weekend against 10th-ranked Long Beach State. Parrent was named the player of the year...
'DOGS, CAL SPLIT IN SOFTBALL AFTER CONTROVERSY IN OPENER They'll be talking a long time about the wild pitch that really wasn't Saturday at Bulldog Diamond. That call -- made by home plate umpire Dennis Wren -- resulted in a 1-0 Fresno State University victory over the California Bears in the first game of an important NorPac Conference double-header before a sunbathed crowd of 947. The ninth-ranked Bears, lip-biting mad over the outcome of that opener, went on to plaster the sixth-ranked Bulldogs 4-2 in the second game and...
2 NYC lawsuits claim company failed to deliver promised tax help A company whose nationwide advertising offered tax delinquents a chance to settle with the IRS for "pennies on the dollar" collected hefty fees but often couldn't deliver on its promises, according to a pair of lawsuits. New York City's Department of Consumer Affairs filed a lawsuit Monday accusing American Tax Relief of bombarding households with junk mail that exaggerated what it could do for clients with big tax debts. Separately, a...
As spooky as the law allows Sacramento Bee / Manny Crisostomo For those who don't think visiting a lawyer's offices is scary enough, the Sacramento staff of Roni Lynn Deutch dressed Friday for Halloween - tax director Scott Schimleski is Dracula, behind legal assistant Le Deutch - and entertained youngsters....
Dear NoelleWiley: At the expense of spelling out what is stunningly obvious to everyone, you stated: "I have seen her commercials on TV all the time, she is very notable." You yourself mentioned the "commercials." Sorry, but a reasonable person will infer that you are implying that her being in a commercial made her worthy of any encyclopedia article. You yourself linked the two concepts in one sentence. Yours, Famspear 00:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear fellow editors: Actually, the language at WP:BIO is "Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals whose work is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field" (emphasis added). Are we seriously trying to contend that Ms. Deutch's work is "widely recognized" in the field of tax law merely because she advertises? Who is "recognizing" her legal work? Legal experts and scholars, or the people who watch her commercials on daytime TV? Please show us where or how her work is part of the "enduring historical record" in the field of U.S. law, or U.S. tax law. Advertising oneself on television? Under that line of reasoning Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. could have rated a Wikipedia article had he never served as a Federal judge or written the scholarly articles and books he wrote, and had simply advertised on television (had TV existed back then). It seems we are saying that what is being recognized is not her legal work, not her contribution to legal scholarship or legal history, but rather the fact that she advertises and is well known because she advertises. Yours, Famspear 18:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep: as far as I can tell, players who have played for their country's youth sides are considered notable enough to have an article. See England_national_under-21_football_team#Current_and_recent_players for example. --- Deville ( Talk) 22:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable youth footballer, appears to fail vanity guidelines ( WP:VANITY), as well as being non-neutral point of view ( WP:NPOV). Original author has only contributed to this article, so possibly an autobiography. Bob talk 15:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was speedy deleted under CSD A7. A DRV consensus overturned, finding an assertion of notability. This article is submitted to AfD for full consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 15:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
While the Pillar of Fire Church may or may not be notable (it gets only 530 Google hits), there's no need for these auxilliary pages about its employees and their children to exist. Notability not established, fails Google test (Mr. Dallenbach gets almost no hits at all), reads like vanity and spam.
These articles are also part of the bundled AfD:
wikipediatrix 15:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment: Why is the college someone attended an "odd detail"? Every biography lists where someone went to college. As a matter of fact each college has a category for alumi. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 21:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. -- CharlotteWebb 20:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Doesn't seem to assert notability. Delete unless notability shown. -- Nlu ( talk) 16:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a spammy and a non-notable website Alexa:812,097. There are plenty of results on Google, but the first several do not appear to be of the sort that would satisfy WP:CORP Erechtheus 16:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. -- CharlotteWebb 21:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
This guy's life really has completely no relevance to the world Nwe 14:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
here is the last stable version with references intact from before the vote for deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pillar_of_Fire_Church&oldid=63154355
This article is NN and completely POV, devoid of any sources backing up the information listed. The Selected Coverage section is misleading in lable as none of the links actually pertain to the church, but to church members, and they are listed as obituaries. Shazbot85 Talk 16:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 19:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
You wrote: "The school never makes the claim of affiliation with the church". If you are still disputing the relationship, here is the text from the website that you say does not contain any mention of affiliation:
Our school partners with a local church, Coastside Community Church. We are a dual ministry -- a church and a school -- with collaborative leadership, complimentary functions, and shared facilities. Our vision is for harmonious growth of church and school with each ministry strengthening and helping the other.
Our school and church belong to a group of national and international ministries founded and directed by the Pillar of Fire, International. The Pillar of Fire provides us with oversight, advice, and material support, and gives us opportunities to participate in congregational, educational, media, and missions ministries around the world.
The Pillar of Fire is an evangelical Christian organization that emphasizes personal faith in Jesus Christ and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit that results in lives devoted to Christian purity and service. The name for the organization is based in the biblical account of God leading his people with a pillar of cloud during the day and a pillar of fire by night (Exodus 13:21-22). We believe that God continues to lead His people through all life's circumstances.
The Pillar of Fire is headquartered in Zarephath, New Jersey. It has six congregations in the United States, five Christian schools, an accredited Christian college, three radio stations, various publications, and missions/partner ministries overseas in England, India, Malawi, Liberia, Nigeria, and Costa Rica.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
Please stick to the topic at hand and work to provide sources. Don't try and de-rail this discussion or try and avert attention away from this unsourced article by providing your opinion pertaining to my character. I consider that mildly insulting but will take it in good faith and again reiterate that what is provided remains unsourced. Also, you are incorrect in your assumption that a "vote for deletion" decides whether a page stays or goes. A neutral moderator will weigh the evidence and ultimately make the descision. If you can't provide the sources, and by now I'm assuming you can't through your use of diversionary tactics, I suggest you simply take the article down until some sources can be added. If they can't, then there doesn't need to be an article. Shazbot85 Talk 03:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs)
These articles are also nominated in a separate AfD:
Now now, calm down and take it elsewhere. This page should be shut down soon as I have withdrawn my AfD claim. Shazbot85 Talk 01:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not appear even close to making WP:WEB. Google turns up very little other than related self promotion. Alexa claims rank over 2,000,000. Also, please note there are several redirects ( Windows RG, Jamesweb, "windows rg", and Windows rg) which should probably go if this page goes.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn event Foo^ 16:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website Foo^ 16:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn website. Foo^ 16:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 14:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn company Foo^ 16:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 14:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn company Foo^ 16:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus, so keep. (aeropagitica) 13:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete (nom) WP is not an arbitrary collection of lists. Articles can be added to an appropriate category. All this seems to be is a collection of redlinks and web links (which WP is also not). — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 16:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Suggest deletion or transwiki Computerjoe 's talk 17:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Fails WP:MUSIC, not verified, not NPOV, much of the article is a possible copyright violation [30] Nonpareility 17:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
del Read and laugh and delete. It is a political joke, not an urban legend, and of dubious notability, too. Does not warrant a separate article or any mention whatsoever. There are millions of jokes in the world. Wikipedia is not a jokebook. `' mikka (t) 17:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
merge as proposed on page. On Dutch wikipedia it is listed as an urban legend, not as a joke. Rex 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Merged in to Niagara Falls, Ontario. (aeropagitica) 13:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This recreational complex is not notable. IronDuke 17:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod; non-notable Geoffrey Spear 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Deleted by Vegaswikian. (aeropagitica) 13:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Article appears to be listcruft. Link in article leads to a section of iTunes that is for music downloaded from LimeWire (according to the article). Will be adding article to this AfD Wildthing61476 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep now that the article has been improved. (aeropagitica) 13:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable as far as I can determine, or a lack of citable sources at least - a Google search only results in the same phrase repeated by every website, always under an article called 'Sakya', which I think was originally copied from Wikipedia anyway. The lack of sources could be due to a language barrier, but I don't think this is the case. KZF 17:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE AS ORIGNAL RESEARCH. (aeropagitica) 13:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Some sort of essay. Original research. User:Zoe| (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork from the Winnie the Pooh article JBKramer 17:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork from Eeyore JBKramer 17:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork from Tigger JBKramer 17:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
POV fork of Piglet JBKramer 17:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Please defer merge-related discussion to the appropriate article talk page(s). Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This article, along with many of the other other articles dealing with the Biblical Mount Sinai give little information, if none at all, outside the main article. I request this page and all the others that I will nominate be deleted. Trevor 17:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because of reasons stated above.
Trevor 18:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I can also see the possibility of a merge, but I have experience in that area, so whatever the community agrees on is fine with me. Trevor 18:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete by consensus and response to keep advocates. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC). reply
List serving no encyclopedic purpose. It is growing, but for the past month noone has addressed my question on the talk page about the purpose it serves. It does not fulfill any of the purposes at Wikipedia:List guideline#Purpose of lists. I believe it violates the WP:NOT rules against being an indiscriminate collection of information and against articles not being "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics". GRBerry 17:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Article looks like it was written by him (writing style same as his website), only result on google is this page. - JeremyBanks Talk 17:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a protologism and original research -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
If you go back to the article you will see a link. In addition, if you google up "anglo/saxon celt" you will see thousands of hits. The condensing of the term to anglosaxoncelt serves only to eliminate the slash and space. Furthermore, if you state that this article serves to promote the point of view of the user, then you must also delete the wikipedia page which denotes "English people" because it also is only promoting a point of view. Ldjenks 19:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Huon, to correct you; I just googled your designation and got over 400 hits, and from all around the world, especially from former colonies of the UK, and many on reputable sites. The exponential growth of the use of the term on the Internet warrants its placement on Wikipedia. Furthermore, if you delete this term you must most certainly delete the designation of "English people" as an ethnic group. Worldwide the word "English" is used increasingly to denote a linguistic term, especially since English is the global language of the world. I travel the world as an ESL teacher, and believe me, since English has now reached global status, it would be in the best interests of the descendants of the UK to use more appropriate terms to denote their cultural heritage than "English".
I see you deleted my link from the article. So here it is again, another source which suggests mixing of anglo/saxon and celts involving DNA research. I have found other research alluding to similar discussions online, but can't locate it right now.
"At one time it was widely believed that the Anglo-Saxons mostly supplanted the Celtic populations. Recent genetic studies disagree, suggesting the Anglo-Saxons established political and cultural dominance over the Celts and intermarried with them. In particular, analyses performed upon the mitochondrial DNA of modern day English suggest that any continental admixture from the period of Germanic invasions would have been almost exclusively derived from the male line, suggesting a process of intermarriage between male invaders and female indigenous Celts." experts.about.com/e/e/en/English_people.htm
Oh, by the way, it appears that someone might have hacked into the about.com website and made a redirect of the above link to wikipedia's website on "English people" sometime within the past 12 hours- a rather shocking development. Which means that as an educated professional, I am now going to copy and paste all of the submissions on this topic, until this little matter can be cleared up, and until the link to about.com is working properly again. I am starting to wonder whether there is some political and/or racial motivation behind one or more of the people who want this submission deleted.
You seem be be willing to designate "English people" as an ethnic group. I don't know how you can rationalize "English people" as an ethnic group, while at the same time dismissing anglo/saxon celts, or anglosaxoncelts as an ethnic group when there are millions of us all over the world. I am merely changing the spelling from Anglo/saxon celt, a term which is showing exponential growth, largely as a result of DNA research, Furthermore, the reduction of the term into one single word "anglosaxoncelt" is starting to see growth on the Internet. This ethnic designation applies to millions of the descendants of former colonists of the UK and Ireland. It is a good solid term which, by the way, is also 'unifying' and not divisive and full of controversy like the term "English", which is more of a linguistic term, "English" seems to separate the 'celts' from the rest of the inhabitants of the United Kingdom, and furthermore, leaves the descendants of the colonists worldwide forever referring to ourselves as "Heinz fifty-sevens".
You need cultural experts, DNA experts, linguistic experts, anthropologists etc, on this topic. Submissions by bioligists and computer programmers, etc. to delete anglosaxoncelt or, if you prefer, anglo/saxon celt, from wikipedia, although important, I am afraid, are not adequate. The terms, anglo/saxon celt or anglosaxoncelt, should no be dismissed so lightly.
To quote Websters:
anglo-saxon: a person of English descent in any country
celtic: a branch of Indo-European languages spoken by the CELTS: Cornish, Breton and Welsh and Irish, Scottish, Gaelic and Manx.
So why not anglosaxoncelt or if you wish, the more traditional anglo/saxon celt?
I have read the page on wikipedia discussing 'anglo-celt'. I suppose the reason I am passionate about the addition of 'saxon' is because anglo/saxon is more commonly used in DNA research as well as celt. I don't see much of anglo-celt in DNA research papers. There should at least be a cross referencing of anglosaxoncelt and/or anglo/saxon celt to 'anglo-celt' until the matter can be settled. In Canada, an anglo-celt would be a person of celtic descent who speaks English, to be distinguished from a franco-celt, a person of celtic descent who speaks French. Ldjenks 15:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Vinneyt6 21:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
By the way, I see wikipedia is allowing the term anglo-celt, which is increasingly popular in Australia. Either both terms should be permitted or deleted as cultural referents. Ldjenks 17:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I need to make a wee clarification. The Anglo-Celt as it refers to Australians is discussed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons Ldjenks 22:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 22:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
You are truly not being clear enough about why you are so hostile to anglo/saxon. It seems to me that your views have a political base; I WANT to hear them, because I am also interested in the anglo-celtic term, but I would prefer anglo-celt. You have to understand that anglo/saxon is a very well known term in Canada. What's wrong with it...and give me a well thought out, researched response along with your political views. I would like to hear both. I am probably going to start up a web page in Canada, and I need to coin a good term that works for us, but that also won't start a war of words throughout the former colonies and the UK and Ireland....As an aside, Germanics also massively settled in North America. At one time the USA debated adopting German as the official language. So perhaps that move in the USA to designate 'anglo-celts' was a response to the huge influence of Germanic populations in North American. But to tell you the truth, there has been so much intermarriage that anglo/saxon/celt seems most appropriate for North American descendents of the UK and Ireland these days. Ldjenks 14:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Alun, I went to anglo-celtic.org.uk, and I would like to speak with the people who created the site, but they list no contact. How do I get in touch with them? I do wish you would truthfully tell me why you don't like the "saxon" word. Hopefully they will. I don't want to start up a web page until the name issues are settled. And you have to admit that anglo/saxon/celt is seeing growth on the Internet.
I'm relieved to see this anglo-celtic.org.uk page. I'ts time for reconciliation in the UK and Ireland, because the strife has hurt the descendents of the former colonists as well. But why anglo-celtic.org.uk and not anglo-celt.org.uk....why the "ic" on celtic? Ldjenks 16:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Alun, if you give me an email address I can send you a file that will give you information about Canada that will likely rock your world. The file is circulating all over in Canada. It`s a pdf and takes about 900 k of space. Then maybe you will understand better the kinds of grassroots movements that are taking place in Canada, and maybe better understand why, worlwide, the descendents of the colonists are seeking unity. You can send me an email contact for you to lyjinx@hotmail.com. LDJenks
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.165.175.139 ( talk • contribs)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sl 1986 ( talk • contribs)
and the (WWV) is.... Weera Wickrama Vibhushanaya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sl 1986 ( talk • contribs)
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
It seems not notable, it's just a gravel pit and a place for trains to pass each other. Awiseman 18:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. Merge may be undertaken once content is translated. Xoloz 17:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Notability not established. Not in English - Nv8200p talk 18:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
page smacks of original research.-- Syrthiss 18:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete G7, author request. NawlinWiki 20:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Spam/Non-notable person. The UK's leading parent coach only gets a dozen or so ghits? Dipics 18:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. There really was no assertion of notability. Article name-drops names of notable bands who've had an influence on this independent artiste, as well as notable genres that he likes, but he hasn't released a full album yet (only a single), nor is he said to be particularly notable in any genre. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 23:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:MUSIC - CrazyRussian talk/ email 18:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a fictional person. One of the links given doesn't work; the other does not mention this performer. Cannot find any other references to this person, let alone as a porn star.— Chidom talk 17:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 12:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable person. Was going to prod but noticed in history that it had been prodded and prod removed on August 21. No attempt to follow WP:V or to add any information to suggest notability. GBYork 19:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The argument that this text is largely original research is unrebutted. I will userfy content for anyone who will work to provide reliable sources for it. Xoloz 17:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This is entirely original research. As the lead of the article states, it is a term used by fans to describe the various levels of "truth". Its essentially unverifiable speculation on which Dragon Ball series are more authoritative to the overall story line. There's no information here thats usable that isn't already in other Dragon Ball articles. Also, there are, of course, no reliable sources. Delete as unverifiable original research. Wickethewok 19:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Bobet 16:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete Reason...Clearly a vanity article created by this person or his art dealer for marketing or publicity purposes. Not noteworthy.
TomPeters 19:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Nominator has made 13 edits, 7 of them for this AfD.
Tyrenius 04:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
This has been listed on
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts.
Tyrenius 04:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity page about someone's fanfic. Google hits return nothing. Would have prodded, but anon made that impossible.
The result was speedy delete CSD A1 - the title asks the question, but the article never provides the answer. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 23:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and probably non-notable. (I think this is a pokemon-related topic, but it's rather hard to tell. The article doesn't make any sense to me.) → smably 19:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:WEB. NN Pokecruft site. Delete. exolon 19:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete this article. The others mentioned below will have to be either group-nominated or CSD'ed individually to be deleted in line with policy and not to appear arbitrary. (aeropagitica) 12:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
does not assert significance. While obviously tragic, Siam's death is no more significant than the hundreds of children killed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since the last intifada began in 2000. Pan Dan 19:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I see that user Alberuni has created many articles each devoted entirely to a Palestinian child victim of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Examples include Rania Iyad Aram, Iman Darweesh Al Hams, and Ghadeer Jaber Mkheemar. While every death is tragic, it is ridiculous to have a wikipedia article devoted to each one. Perhaps a list of child victims of the Israel-Palestinian conflict, or something like that, could be created instead of one article per child. Pan Dan 20:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
(As I am a newly registered user, and Alberuni's talk page is protected, I am not able to notify him/her that the article he/she created is being considered for deletion. Maybe a kind passerby will do that for me. Thanks.) Pan Dan 20:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Corpobabble roll call: "powerful framework", "fully-conceptualized product", "seamless integration", "robust, event-based", "Intuitive user interfaces", "leverages intellectual assets" -- yep, all here. Nonnotable software and company -- also nominating TechExcel. NawlinWiki 20:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted as per consensus. WP:IAR ON WHEELS!!!. Garrett Talk 21:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Article is WP:OR, And wikipedia is not a computer game walkthrough site. Geoffrey Spear 20:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails to meet notability standards on WP:MUSIC, probable vanity page. -- Maestlin 20:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There are already articles on both Thomas Paine and Common Sense. This is a personal essay not an encyclopedia article.-- NHSavage 20:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete by Doc glasgow - (aye, right).-- Andeh 20:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT refers - OK it exists but it is not encyclopaedic. Strong Delete. BlueValour 20:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person as per WP:BIO Valrith 20:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Completely fan-made, unverifiable, unimportant, and overall useless information. I also nominate its redirects Armageddon fist, Grand Calamity Symphony, and Grand calamity symphony. Note: This debate has been added to the list of Final Fantasy deletions. Hibana 20:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
The result was delete. --- Deville ( Talk) 23:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Advertisement, fails WP:CORP, no sources given or likely to be found. Prod contested by anon. Delete -- Huon 20:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable subject. This is the only album by a rock group that lacks its own article on Wikipedia. -- Maestlin 20:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band, fails WP:BAND, only assertions of notability are "4 top 20 hits on P-1 radio" (whatever that is) and "a number 1 album on Billboard regionally". No sources given or likely to be found. Prod contested by author. Delete -- Huon 21:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
In my opinion, does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (web) Tivedshambo ( talk) 21:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
^ Delete about 700 google hits. no google news hits. :) Dlohcierekim 01:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn/merge. -- wwwwolf ( barks/ growls) 15:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod/Unprod so I'm taking this to the community. I'm claiming deletion under notability for this article. I could maybe see a reason for keep if this character was in a popular, current, franchise, but it has been 14 years since this character was in game. -- Mitaphane talk 21:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as a non-notable advert/neologism. (aeropagitica) 11:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Started out as a subtle advertisement, now just a low-content, non-notable neologism OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 01:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Not really an article. No context of why this is notable - Nv8200p talk 21:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer D iablo 14:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Strong Delete, this is an utterly non-notable computer package. It is used by Wikipedia editors (including me). However, noone else uses it or has commented on it. Nilfanion ( talk) 21:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Would not pass the proposed WP:PORN BIO or a Japanese equivalent, having no notable awards in Japan, or notable mainstream work, notable magazine appearances, etc etc. Delete. --- Hong Qi Gong 21:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer D iablo 20:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Until this guy actually has released the movie this is pure crystalballism. Pascal.Tesson 21:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
No links to it. Does not seem notable. Delete. Green caterpillar 21:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a copyvio from the website. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
NN Computerjoe 's talk 21:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company's vanity/blatant spam DMacks 21:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Fail WP:CORP, WP:NFT, WP:VAIN etc. etc. Geoffrey Spear 21:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted by NawlinWiki. W.marsh 22:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Seems like a vanity page. Delete. Green caterpillar 21:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Listcruft, anyone? This article serves no useful encyclopedic purpose, and is completely unreferenced. This doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Mysekurity 21:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
The result was keep. VoiceOfReason 17:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Suggest that company does not meet Notability Criteria for companies and corporations. Article has persisted in a grossly NPOV state for some time. Representatives of the company itself have moved in on article, instituted a blatantly ad-like tone, and stymied neutralizing efforts. Anazgnos 21:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable article.if we had a page for every type of spoiler,we would have waay to many articles. User:The pink panther22:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The subject of the entry in question is only notable for a brief appearance in the "Beyond the Mat" documentary and Fancruft that has sprung up in the past several months. Seeing as how the page seems to solely exist for this purpose, and that his work alone would not be notable enough to justify an entry, I think it should be considered for deletion. Thoughts? Deputy Marshall 22:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Now I'm being censored. Freedom of Speech. First Amendment. These fascists are ruining this site, and this great nation. LIBERTY FOR STAMP!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.114.247.64 ( talk • contribs)
The result was flagged as copyvio. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 23:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity page. "Sleeping States" Starkie gets 45 G-hits. Morgan Wick 22:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Project is non-notable, and article also fails to mention notability. I'm not familiar with any of this type of stuff, so I'm looking for a second opinion. -- Nishkid64 23:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete by Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh under CSD G7
Nonnotable band. I changed the speedy tag to a prod to give the author an opportunity to provide sources; the sources provided are all links on the band's own website. NawlinWiki 23:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of this AfD was delete. It was deleted before the AfD finished out. -- Nishkid64 00:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I googled "Robrindra" and got 6 hits, none of which correspond to this disease. I went to Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Missing diseases/9 and found nothing there titled "Robrindra" or something close to that nature. I believe it's a hoax based on the information in the article, such as it saying that Arthur Russell died of Robrinda when he really died of AIDS. -- Nishkid64 23:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP. Orphaned. Original author linkspammed two other articles ( [38] [39]) with a link to the company (with a suspiciously "information" URL for each). JS talk 23:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP and seems to be written in vain. Creator of the article is User:Centauricom -- Nishkid64 23:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus/default keep. Closure is mildly influenced by misuse of the word "infinitesimal." I believe the nominator meant "potentially infinite", which is usually expressed at AfD with word "unmaintainable". Xoloz 17:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Dynamiclist, infinitesimal. (Actually, it has no encyclopædic value.) TrackerTV ( CW| Castform| Green Valley) 23:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by GIen. -- Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I don't think everything that exists should have an article, but I'm not sure if this is a very notable term in the business world. -- Nishkid64 23:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete by User:CanadianCaesar as empty. TimBentley (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply
This empty page conflates the names of two important Queens of Swaziland who ruled as regents. Tsandzile Ndwandwe (siSwati spelling; Thandile is isiZulu) was the mother of Mswati II & was regent in the late 1830s. Labotsibeni (Gwamile) Mdluli was the mother of Sobhuza II & was regent from 1899 to 1922 i.e. the first decades of British colonization. See e.g. Hilda Kuper, An African Aristocracy (NY: Africana Publishing Co., 1980 [reprint 1947 ed.]. The conflation may pose problems for work I want to do on various Swaziland related articles. Ngwe 00:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply