Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:22, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity and/or hoax, delete-- nixie 00:11, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ditto, throw it out. delete-- Thewastedsmile 02:02, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:22, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
As advertising copy goes, this is okay. But as a Wikipedia article, all I learn from it is that the author clearly enjoys the game. Improve or delete. -- llywrch 00:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:23, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Internet neoligism, most google hits are in german so it is difficult to tell if this is a unique type of game-- nixie 00:44, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:23, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Self-promotion for a student association with 200 members, delete-- nixie 01:05, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:24, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A summer camp on Cape Cod, non-notable, delete. -- nixie 01:31, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to X-Play. – AB CD 02:07, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia already has an X-Play page (The other page in question is with the capitalized P here: X-Play); two pages repeating the same information is redundant and there's little reason to keep both around. -- Thewastedsmile 01:43, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:25, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism, a celetoid is a celebrity that gains brief fame by some event that they are attributed to. 3 google hits, not worth keeping as a redirect, delete-- nixie 01:56, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was userfy. –
AB
CD 16:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This article is inherently non-notable, and also a terribly-written article. Delete. -- Cabhan 02:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
In Vietnamese, looks like something historical. Has had 2 weeks on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English with no action. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:35, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:47, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:18, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article claims Ms. Dickson won Ms. California and Ms. World Beauty, but got no google hits in conjunction with any of those (or for ["Brenda Dickson" "Ms. World"]). Delete as unverifiable. Starblind has shown me the error of my ways, and I wish to keep this article.
Meelar
(talk) 03:28, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
Meelar
(talk) 03:08, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
BLANKFAZE |
(что??) 03:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is a straight copy of [1]. It is not a copyvio, however, because the page grants permission for noncommercial use. I would say move to Wikisource, but WS documents generally aren't supposed to duplicate material found elsewhere on the web. Ideally, someone should write an original article on the subject. Otherwise delete. -- Scott eiπ + 1 = 0 03:11, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:22, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article on accents particular to Cape Bretton, unencyclopedic, delete-- nixie 03:20, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (block-compress error). –
AB
CD 20:48, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
There is no potential for metamorphosis of this dictionary article about adverb into an encyclopaedia article about a person/place/thing/concept, nor any place to redirect it to; Wiktionary already has Wiktionary:facetiously, and even it it hadn't, it wouldn't want a copyright violation taken from dictionary.com. Uncle G 03:49, 2005 Mar 23 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
BLANKFAZE |
(что??) 03:10, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
An "alleged secret international organization" that is so secret Google has never heard of it. More likely a joke than an actual conspiracy theory. SWAdair | Talk 03:57, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus; thus, the article is kept. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:25, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article on a housing development. Ganymead 04:41, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by MacGyverMagic as unencyclopedic substub.
Thue |
talk 09:05, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This person does not seem to be anyone of particular note. The page seems to be one written by Jordan Austin herself, or someone close to her. Perhaps it was written as a joke.
- Special Kay 04:42, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
I am the creator and please do not delete it. I only vandilized once because I removed something without reading it.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:49, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:49, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Article does not establish notability. — Korath ( Talk) 04:44, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to school (discipline). – AB CD 02:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
keep
comment: represents a type of skiing
The result of the debate was no consensus. – AB CD 02:22, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A junior high school. Does not establish notability. ( previous vfd) — Korath ( Talk) 04:47, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
GRider has made an attempt at vote-swinging for this nomination [2]. (Added by User:Radiant!)
Even though GRider and I disagree on most VfD votes, the contention that anybody's votes are unacceptable because of some perceived ballot stuffing is not valid. Only anons' and sockpuppets' votes are discounted. Editors in good standing have a perfect right to have their votes counted. This supposed policy change is inappropriate to discuss on a VfD page, and should be taken to Talk. Rick K 00:19, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 02:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Spam, also copyvio of [3]. -- Scott eiπ + 1 = 0 04:56, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:52, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity, spam, non-notable, take your pick. — Korath ( Talk) 04:59, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:31, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not noteworthy. Doesn't pass "google test". Nothing links to this page. If somebody would be willing to flesh the page out and provide more information on the person, or some pertinent links elsewhere in the wikipedia, I'm all for keeping it. Right now, it's useless. Avriette 04:24, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:52, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity entry from a Dutch guy who has a website. Delete. -- Tony Sidaway| Talk 05:04, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:53, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is original research. The author previously wrote this at Circumcision and HIV, but has since moved it to its current title. Rhobite 05:08, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:54, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism, 10 hits on google so it's hardly in use, delete-- nixie 05:41, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to
pitcher (container). —
Korath (
Talk) 01:33, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Kevinbot tagged this with a speedy after transwiki-ing. The wiktionary tag was disputed, but my opinion is that this article has potential (e.g. ewer design through history [4]) and should be kept. Kappa 06:44, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:57, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Does not seem to be notable to me. Weak Delete.
Google test 390 hits,
Alexa test 155,425 rank. --
cesarb 05:46, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It is no more an 'advert' than the inclusion of Google. If the criteria for inclsuion is how popular a page is then the whole wiki project will grow to do little more than perpetuate the popular. The glory of Wiki is to allow the newcomers a tiny voice in the sea of sites judged virtually exclusively by its PageRank.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisment for Charles website, also wikipedia is not the Guniess Book of WW. -- nixie 05:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 02:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not precisely sure what to do with this one. It originally was an amusing, but illegitimate redirect to Paul Keating. Unless someone can come up with some sort of useful content (there may be a Captain Wacky somewhere I don't know about), Delete, and BJAODN. Lacrimosus 05:55, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:59, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Self-promotion for a group that has made a few web movies, delete-- nixie 06:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:36, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Nonsense. Rick K 06:17, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. This debate has been extremely contentious, just like the other debates about other high schools. The result is split down the middle, with some vehemently arguing for deletion, and others vehemently arguing for inclusion. There has been a lot of commenting on people's votes, and there have been claims of vote stuffing. Since this article has been on VfD for a very long time now, I will close it. Deletion requires a consensus, and there does not appear to be one.
Sjakkalle 07:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I live not all that far away from this school and know of it reasonably well. I do not think it has anything notable about it. Delete Lacrimosus 06:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep, WINP. ( Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 09:32, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Sjakkalle 08:05, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity page. Should be deleted. Sonzai 07:26, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - no consensus -
SimonP 21:11, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Definite genealogical entry as it stands (I found it, incidentally, by googling "geneology", a common misspelling). Remove the unencyclopedic detail, and this article says he founded the Seattle-Tacoma Box Company and had a notable grandson, John Hopcroft. The current mentions in those two articles should be sufficient. Or am I missing something obvious? — Korath ( Talk) 07:41, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 22:52, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Orphaned genealogy. — Korath ( Talk) 08:00, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - non consensus (16 delete, 8 keep, 1 merge, 1 invalid merge and delete) -
SimonP 21:16, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Speculation. Rick K 08:13, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
-- BD2412 20:17, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:40, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article is insultive, POV/Propoganda based and not informative. Unsalvagable.
So it is factual that "Mustafa Kemal is a hater of Islam", etc... etc... The misguided person is using a "game" to promote his views in the CD, 100% propoganda, not wiki material. Cat chi? 22:06, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to
Scotch Game. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:42, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
I have never heard of the Napoleon Gambit. The variation given is not a gambit since nothing is being sacrificed (except the queen, 3.Qxf7+?? is not mate). The author is probably confusing this with the Napoleon Opening, which is 1.e4 e5 2.Qf3, but I see no useful content in this article worth merging anywhere, and since the Napoleon is not a gambit I cannot see the title being useful either. Sjakkalle 09:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement for a website. Delete. — JIP | Talk 11:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:48, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Very short article with little or no context and therefore should be deleted Berserker79 11:32, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:50, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
A rather small and unimportant place somewhere in Australia, the only notable thing about the place is that an alleged politician called George Ober grew up there; however, Ober does not seem to be verifiable ("George Ober" liberal and "George Ober" Australia both turn up nothing relevant on Google). If the questionable paragraph about Ober is removed, we're left with a place that is some distance from Canberra and has four distinct seasons -- Ferkelparade π 12:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:37, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Jpgordon and Charles Matthews.
Thue |
talk 09:08, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place for writing homeworks. Delete. Possibly a speedy deletion candidate (under "no meaningful content or history"). - Mike Rosoft 14:43, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to
Morden Hall Park. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:54, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
This page is not really about the person but about the Morden Hall Park he gave. The content is the same has this latter page, which is more detailled/wikified. Besides the are no links to this page. Lvr 15:18, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:31, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Unverifiable substub. Possibly vanity? sjorford →•← 15:49, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:28, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Current status: DELETED
Appears to be a list of unverified--and probably unverifiable--statements. In effect, this is an opinion piece. It's an intriguing one, interesting opinions are put, but it's not--with this title and this wording--an encyclopedia article. -- Tony Sidaway| Talk 16:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The consensus is to delete, and I have no objection. I'll cut and paste to User:Ed Poor/cults. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 15:34, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged -
SimonP 21:20, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
This is a dictionary entry. It is the definition and an example. This has been transwikied, and should be deleted as the last step in that process.
Kevin Rector 17:21, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected -
SimonP 21:22, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Dictionary entry (including definition and some etymology) for a Scottish slang word. The entry has been transwikied and should be deleted as the last step of the process. Kevin Rector 17:37, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 21:00, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's an gamecruft FAQ in IGN. Google returned 84 results. - Mailer Diablo 17:38, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by SWAdair as spam.
Thue |
talk 09:10, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Looks like advertising for a future company. Google results says it all. - Mailer Diablo 17:45, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Daniela Stanciu as spam.
Thue |
talk 09:12, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. Also see []Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/DDB Design]]. - Mailer Diablo 17:46, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:29, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Inter\ Echo 17:59, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was move to
WP:IFD. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:58, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Doctored beyond recognition, compare to [6]. 213.54.227.131 18:59, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Rmhermen, as joke neologism presumably.
Thue |
talk 09:13, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Silly vanity. Delete. -- BD2412 20:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was copyvio. –
AB
CD 16:30, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This name breaks WP's naming convetions. Patrick Girouard passes the Google test for notability, but this page should be reirected to correct capitalization at Patrick Girouard. I propose redirect and merge.-- Dmcdevit 20:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:59, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Now (speedy) Deleted on grounds that content wiped by original creator; no links into page. -- Vamp: Willow 12:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:22, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity and/or hoax, delete-- nixie 00:11, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ditto, throw it out. delete-- Thewastedsmile 02:02, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:22, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
As advertising copy goes, this is okay. But as a Wikipedia article, all I learn from it is that the author clearly enjoys the game. Improve or delete. -- llywrch 00:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:23, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Internet neoligism, most google hits are in german so it is difficult to tell if this is a unique type of game-- nixie 00:44, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:23, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Self-promotion for a student association with 200 members, delete-- nixie 01:05, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:24, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A summer camp on Cape Cod, non-notable, delete. -- nixie 01:31, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to X-Play. – AB CD 02:07, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia already has an X-Play page (The other page in question is with the capitalized P here: X-Play); two pages repeating the same information is redundant and there's little reason to keep both around. -- Thewastedsmile 01:43, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:25, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism, a celetoid is a celebrity that gains brief fame by some event that they are attributed to. 3 google hits, not worth keeping as a redirect, delete-- nixie 01:56, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was userfy. –
AB
CD 16:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This article is inherently non-notable, and also a terribly-written article. Delete. -- Cabhan 02:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
In Vietnamese, looks like something historical. Has had 2 weeks on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English with no action. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:35, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:47, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:18, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article claims Ms. Dickson won Ms. California and Ms. World Beauty, but got no google hits in conjunction with any of those (or for ["Brenda Dickson" "Ms. World"]). Delete as unverifiable. Starblind has shown me the error of my ways, and I wish to keep this article.
Meelar
(talk) 03:28, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
Meelar
(talk) 03:08, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
BLANKFAZE |
(что??) 03:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is a straight copy of [1]. It is not a copyvio, however, because the page grants permission for noncommercial use. I would say move to Wikisource, but WS documents generally aren't supposed to duplicate material found elsewhere on the web. Ideally, someone should write an original article on the subject. Otherwise delete. -- Scott eiπ + 1 = 0 03:11, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:22, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article on accents particular to Cape Bretton, unencyclopedic, delete-- nixie 03:20, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (block-compress error). –
AB
CD 20:48, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
There is no potential for metamorphosis of this dictionary article about adverb into an encyclopaedia article about a person/place/thing/concept, nor any place to redirect it to; Wiktionary already has Wiktionary:facetiously, and even it it hadn't, it wouldn't want a copyright violation taken from dictionary.com. Uncle G 03:49, 2005 Mar 23 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
BLANKFAZE |
(что??) 03:10, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
An "alleged secret international organization" that is so secret Google has never heard of it. More likely a joke than an actual conspiracy theory. SWAdair | Talk 03:57, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus; thus, the article is kept. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:25, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article on a housing development. Ganymead 04:41, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by MacGyverMagic as unencyclopedic substub.
Thue |
talk 09:05, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This person does not seem to be anyone of particular note. The page seems to be one written by Jordan Austin herself, or someone close to her. Perhaps it was written as a joke.
- Special Kay 04:42, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
I am the creator and please do not delete it. I only vandilized once because I removed something without reading it.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:49, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:49, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Article does not establish notability. — Korath ( Talk) 04:44, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to school (discipline). – AB CD 02:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
keep
comment: represents a type of skiing
The result of the debate was no consensus. – AB CD 02:22, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A junior high school. Does not establish notability. ( previous vfd) — Korath ( Talk) 04:47, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
GRider has made an attempt at vote-swinging for this nomination [2]. (Added by User:Radiant!)
Even though GRider and I disagree on most VfD votes, the contention that anybody's votes are unacceptable because of some perceived ballot stuffing is not valid. Only anons' and sockpuppets' votes are discounted. Editors in good standing have a perfect right to have their votes counted. This supposed policy change is inappropriate to discuss on a VfD page, and should be taken to Talk. Rick K 00:19, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 02:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Spam, also copyvio of [3]. -- Scott eiπ + 1 = 0 04:56, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:52, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity, spam, non-notable, take your pick. — Korath ( Talk) 04:59, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:31, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not noteworthy. Doesn't pass "google test". Nothing links to this page. If somebody would be willing to flesh the page out and provide more information on the person, or some pertinent links elsewhere in the wikipedia, I'm all for keeping it. Right now, it's useless. Avriette 04:24, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:52, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity entry from a Dutch guy who has a website. Delete. -- Tony Sidaway| Talk 05:04, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:53, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is original research. The author previously wrote this at Circumcision and HIV, but has since moved it to its current title. Rhobite 05:08, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:54, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism, 10 hits on google so it's hardly in use, delete-- nixie 05:41, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to
pitcher (container). —
Korath (
Talk) 01:33, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Kevinbot tagged this with a speedy after transwiki-ing. The wiktionary tag was disputed, but my opinion is that this article has potential (e.g. ewer design through history [4]) and should be kept. Kappa 06:44, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:57, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Does not seem to be notable to me. Weak Delete.
Google test 390 hits,
Alexa test 155,425 rank. --
cesarb 05:46, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It is no more an 'advert' than the inclusion of Google. If the criteria for inclsuion is how popular a page is then the whole wiki project will grow to do little more than perpetuate the popular. The glory of Wiki is to allow the newcomers a tiny voice in the sea of sites judged virtually exclusively by its PageRank.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisment for Charles website, also wikipedia is not the Guniess Book of WW. -- nixie 05:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 02:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not precisely sure what to do with this one. It originally was an amusing, but illegitimate redirect to Paul Keating. Unless someone can come up with some sort of useful content (there may be a Captain Wacky somewhere I don't know about), Delete, and BJAODN. Lacrimosus 05:55, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:59, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Self-promotion for a group that has made a few web movies, delete-- nixie 06:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:36, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Nonsense. Rick K 06:17, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. This debate has been extremely contentious, just like the other debates about other high schools. The result is split down the middle, with some vehemently arguing for deletion, and others vehemently arguing for inclusion. There has been a lot of commenting on people's votes, and there have been claims of vote stuffing. Since this article has been on VfD for a very long time now, I will close it. Deletion requires a consensus, and there does not appear to be one.
Sjakkalle 07:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I live not all that far away from this school and know of it reasonably well. I do not think it has anything notable about it. Delete Lacrimosus 06:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep, WINP. ( Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 09:32, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Sjakkalle 08:05, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity page. Should be deleted. Sonzai 07:26, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - no consensus -
SimonP 21:11, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Definite genealogical entry as it stands (I found it, incidentally, by googling "geneology", a common misspelling). Remove the unencyclopedic detail, and this article says he founded the Seattle-Tacoma Box Company and had a notable grandson, John Hopcroft. The current mentions in those two articles should be sufficient. Or am I missing something obvious? — Korath ( Talk) 07:41, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 22:52, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Orphaned genealogy. — Korath ( Talk) 08:00, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - non consensus (16 delete, 8 keep, 1 merge, 1 invalid merge and delete) -
SimonP 21:16, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Speculation. Rick K 08:13, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
-- BD2412 20:17, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:40, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Article is insultive, POV/Propoganda based and not informative. Unsalvagable.
So it is factual that "Mustafa Kemal is a hater of Islam", etc... etc... The misguided person is using a "game" to promote his views in the CD, 100% propoganda, not wiki material. Cat chi? 22:06, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to
Scotch Game. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:42, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
I have never heard of the Napoleon Gambit. The variation given is not a gambit since nothing is being sacrificed (except the queen, 3.Qxf7+?? is not mate). The author is probably confusing this with the Napoleon Opening, which is 1.e4 e5 2.Qf3, but I see no useful content in this article worth merging anywhere, and since the Napoleon is not a gambit I cannot see the title being useful either. Sjakkalle 09:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement for a website. Delete. — JIP | Talk 11:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:48, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Very short article with little or no context and therefore should be deleted Berserker79 11:32, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:50, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
A rather small and unimportant place somewhere in Australia, the only notable thing about the place is that an alleged politician called George Ober grew up there; however, Ober does not seem to be verifiable ("George Ober" liberal and "George Ober" Australia both turn up nothing relevant on Google). If the questionable paragraph about Ober is removed, we're left with a place that is some distance from Canberra and has four distinct seasons -- Ferkelparade π 12:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:37, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Jpgordon and Charles Matthews.
Thue |
talk 09:08, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place for writing homeworks. Delete. Possibly a speedy deletion candidate (under "no meaningful content or history"). - Mike Rosoft 14:43, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to
Morden Hall Park. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:54, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
This page is not really about the person but about the Morden Hall Park he gave. The content is the same has this latter page, which is more detailled/wikified. Besides the are no links to this page. Lvr 15:18, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:31, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Unverifiable substub. Possibly vanity? sjorford →•← 15:49, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:28, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Current status: DELETED
Appears to be a list of unverified--and probably unverifiable--statements. In effect, this is an opinion piece. It's an intriguing one, interesting opinions are put, but it's not--with this title and this wording--an encyclopedia article. -- Tony Sidaway| Talk 16:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The consensus is to delete, and I have no objection. I'll cut and paste to User:Ed Poor/cults. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 15:34, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged -
SimonP 21:20, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
This is a dictionary entry. It is the definition and an example. This has been transwikied, and should be deleted as the last step in that process.
Kevin Rector 17:21, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected -
SimonP 21:22, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Dictionary entry (including definition and some etymology) for a Scottish slang word. The entry has been transwikied and should be deleted as the last step of the process. Kevin Rector 17:37, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 21:00, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's an gamecruft FAQ in IGN. Google returned 84 results. - Mailer Diablo 17:38, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by SWAdair as spam.
Thue |
talk 09:10, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Looks like advertising for a future company. Google results says it all. - Mailer Diablo 17:45, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Daniela Stanciu as spam.
Thue |
talk 09:12, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. Also see []Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/DDB Design]]. - Mailer Diablo 17:46, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 16:29, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Inter\ Echo 17:59, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was move to
WP:IFD. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:58, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Doctored beyond recognition, compare to [6]. 213.54.227.131 18:59, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Rmhermen, as joke neologism presumably.
Thue |
talk 09:13, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Silly vanity. Delete. -- BD2412 20:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was copyvio. –
AB
CD 16:30, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This name breaks WP's naming convetions. Patrick Girouard passes the Google test for notability, but this page should be reirected to correct capitalization at Patrick Girouard. I propose redirect and merge.-- Dmcdevit 20:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:59, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Now (speedy) Deleted on grounds that content wiped by original creator; no links into page. -- Vamp: Willow 12:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.