The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (
Talk) 02:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)reply
antisemitic term when used outside of context, does not need its own redirects or article. Merely a mention as done in the South Park episode is more than sufficient. —Moops⋠
T⋡ 00:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Two extremely marginal, scrape-the-bottom-of-the-barrel entries don't warrant a dab page per
WP:NOTEVENTWODABS.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 00:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete because toxic waste goes in the barrel
jengod (
talk) 01:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete So it was used once on a tv show and in another case? Two obscure references, not needed here.
Oaktree b (
talk) 02:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
With the low views for the redirects and with how bad of a term it is, add salt to my delete vote, and do the same to other versions of the term.
LilianaUwU(
talk /
contributions) 16:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, and would also included the redirect for the article article
Jewgold as well as it does not seem like a necessary redirect link. -
Delete - As cited by above other fellow editors
Pranesh Ravikumar (
talk) 11:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, salt, no redirect. Per Epluribusunumyall, the other redirect just doesn't make sense itself either as it's not even linked to the episode article itself, and its historic peak was
merely 51 views in early 2021. This page only cleared above 125 views/day
twice. It's otherwise pejorative and should not be here. Also don't forget the capitalized
Jew Gold rd. Nate•(
chatter) 16:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - I agree, kill it with fire. Offensive on its face. If it were historic I'd say redirect, but the occurrences cited don't seem to warrant that.
Elinruby (
talk) 17:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment, seems to be clear consensus to delete this, which as the nom, I just wanted to make sure that we also delete all the related redirects at the same time. I recently nominated two others, but if there are others too that I am missing lets try and get them all in one go. TY —Moops⋠
T⋡ 03:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)reply
This will be unnecessary, since those redirects will be speedy deleted per
G8 if this page is. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 04:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)reply
This was actually
created by an account called "Alekkk" that was indefinitely blocked because of that username within two hours of that.
Their other edit on the topic had single quotes around the adjective fictional for the racist idea. I guess we should have just
denied recognition more thoroughly back in 2009. --
Joy (
talk) 08:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete page and delete all redirects. Content listed is niche to be assumed that this is what a reader is looking for.
Toomuchcuriosity (
talk) 23:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (
Talk) 02:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)reply
antisemitic term when used outside of context, does not need its own redirects or article. Merely a mention as done in the South Park episode is more than sufficient. —Moops⋠
T⋡ 00:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Two extremely marginal, scrape-the-bottom-of-the-barrel entries don't warrant a dab page per
WP:NOTEVENTWODABS.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 00:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete because toxic waste goes in the barrel
jengod (
talk) 01:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete So it was used once on a tv show and in another case? Two obscure references, not needed here.
Oaktree b (
talk) 02:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
With the low views for the redirects and with how bad of a term it is, add salt to my delete vote, and do the same to other versions of the term.
LilianaUwU(
talk /
contributions) 16:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, and would also included the redirect for the article article
Jewgold as well as it does not seem like a necessary redirect link. -
Delete - As cited by above other fellow editors
Pranesh Ravikumar (
talk) 11:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, salt, no redirect. Per Epluribusunumyall, the other redirect just doesn't make sense itself either as it's not even linked to the episode article itself, and its historic peak was
merely 51 views in early 2021. This page only cleared above 125 views/day
twice. It's otherwise pejorative and should not be here. Also don't forget the capitalized
Jew Gold rd. Nate•(
chatter) 16:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - I agree, kill it with fire. Offensive on its face. If it were historic I'd say redirect, but the occurrences cited don't seem to warrant that.
Elinruby (
talk) 17:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment, seems to be clear consensus to delete this, which as the nom, I just wanted to make sure that we also delete all the related redirects at the same time. I recently nominated two others, but if there are others too that I am missing lets try and get them all in one go. TY —Moops⋠
T⋡ 03:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)reply
This will be unnecessary, since those redirects will be speedy deleted per
G8 if this page is. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 04:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)reply
This was actually
created by an account called "Alekkk" that was indefinitely blocked because of that username within two hours of that.
Their other edit on the topic had single quotes around the adjective fictional for the racist idea. I guess we should have just
denied recognition more thoroughly back in 2009. --
Joy (
talk) 08:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete page and delete all redirects. Content listed is niche to be assumed that this is what a reader is looking for.
Toomuchcuriosity (
talk) 23:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.