The result was merge to Anwyl of Tywyn Family. Spartaz Humbug! 04:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability by our criteria. I'm not even convinced it's worth a mention in House of Aberffraw which needs some trimming to meet our criteria at WP:NOT which says "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. One measure of these is whether someone has been featured in several external sources (on or off-line)." Dougweller ( talk) 11:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was notable enough to be DYK, so why is it not notable now? ~ Geaugagrrl talk 10:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC) reply
On 7 April, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Evan Vaughan Anwyl, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
NOTE - James Frankcom has been asking for some people to come here and vote to keep the article. [1] and [2] and to an IP here [3] BritishWatcher ( talk) 09:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete - If not then merge, clearly lacks notability. BritishWatcher ( talk) 09:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep The notability test is surely about minor pop stars, one time television presenters, etc who have often been behind the making of their own wikipedia entry to increase their own visibility. I don't think that policy was conceived to be used in a case like this which is about the head of a dynasty who represents, almost certainly, the only surviving male heir of any of the descendants of Rhodri Mawr. He and his family are recorded in Burke's Peerage and have been written about over many years by numerous authors (most of whom are listed in the references of that article). There are also DOZENS if not HUNDREDS of articles that show someone's full ancestry, and in this case, to go back to Owain Gwynedd is crucial in establishing the Anwyl ancestry. I have been forced to ask for help from editing colleagues because I have little or no confidence in the fairness of this procedure. It's already a done deal. Doug go on mate have your own way again and just delete whatever you want. I am just about through... James Frankcom ( talk) 10:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Anwyl of Tywyn Family. Spartaz Humbug! 04:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability by our criteria. I'm not even convinced it's worth a mention in House of Aberffraw which needs some trimming to meet our criteria at WP:NOT which says "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. One measure of these is whether someone has been featured in several external sources (on or off-line)." Dougweller ( talk) 11:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was notable enough to be DYK, so why is it not notable now? ~ Geaugagrrl talk 10:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC) reply
On 7 April, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Evan Vaughan Anwyl, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
NOTE - James Frankcom has been asking for some people to come here and vote to keep the article. [1] and [2] and to an IP here [3] BritishWatcher ( talk) 09:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete - If not then merge, clearly lacks notability. BritishWatcher ( talk) 09:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep The notability test is surely about minor pop stars, one time television presenters, etc who have often been behind the making of their own wikipedia entry to increase their own visibility. I don't think that policy was conceived to be used in a case like this which is about the head of a dynasty who represents, almost certainly, the only surviving male heir of any of the descendants of Rhodri Mawr. He and his family are recorded in Burke's Peerage and have been written about over many years by numerous authors (most of whom are listed in the references of that article). There are also DOZENS if not HUNDREDS of articles that show someone's full ancestry, and in this case, to go back to Owain Gwynedd is crucial in establishing the Anwyl ancestry. I have been forced to ask for help from editing colleagues because I have little or no confidence in the fairness of this procedure. It's already a done deal. Doug go on mate have your own way again and just delete whatever you want. I am just about through... James Frankcom ( talk) 10:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply