This user assumes good faith.

This user is a member of the Kindness Campaign.

This user tries to do the right thing. If she makes a mistake, please let her know.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Badgernet has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{ subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

..for all the hard work on WPW !  Badgernet   ₪  10:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Template:Bridgend has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker ( talk) 17:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:Neath Port Talbot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker ( talk) 17:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Geaugagrrl, I've filled the Bridgend template as best I can and it has been taken out of the deletion process. I've filled in the Neath Port Talbot template, but as I began distributing it, it appears there are already several templates for the region, and we are now doubling up. Any ideas on how to progress this? FruitMonkey ( talk) 21:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

It seems to be a free-for-all on templates. There were none when I first designed this group (that I could easily find), now there appears to be many. It is usually a group decision which template takes precedent. Thanks so much for all your help. A posting to the Wales Project page asking for input of what others think would possibly be helpful. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 20:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Wales Barnstar
		As a constant beacon in all things Welsh, and one of them few that attempted to get the WikiProject Barnstar off the ground may I be the first to award any contributor to Welsh matters with a Welsh Barnstar. FruitMonkey ( talk) 00:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Many thanks! *bow* ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 04:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey Geaugagrrl, just letting you know that I filed a notice for the issues at Kingdom of Ceredigion on copyright problems. I know you didn't intend to break the copyright rules, I just wanted to get some more knowledgeable eyes than mine on it. Hopefully this can be resolved with a simple rewrite.-- Cúchullain ^t/ c 13:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC) reply

As I said on the article talk page, the author of the article gave full permission for it to be published. He did not want a major re-write. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 02:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. May I humbly enquire about the usage 'Cille Aeron', vis-a-vis 'Ciliau Aeron'? Is it a recently adopted (well justified) phonetic transition? Also, the Unitarian chapel there is called (Capel) Neuaddlwyd (or Neuadd Lwyd). Some of my 19th-century ancestors got married there. Mysteriously, they seem later to have bolted back to orthodoxy at nearby St Non's, Llanerchaeron. Cheers Bjenks ( talk) 15:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the delayed response. I will investigate and let you know what I learn. All my non-conformist relations apparently stayed that way according to all my research :-) Bye for now. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 16:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Here's the response I received:

CILIAU AERON is the only correct spelling. The local Welsh pronunciation is *Kilye, with the accent on the first syllable, and the second pronounced ::with a very short 'e'. The chapel at Neuaddlwyd (correct spelling) was NEVER Unitarian. It has been since its foundation in 1810 a Congregationalist ::(Independent) congregation, with an academy for training ministers and missionaries, which has long closed, but produced the first missionaries to ::Madagascar. Hope this helps. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 13:06, 20 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Many thanks for your pains. And (oops) you're quite right about the chapel. I was confusing it with the rather architecturally similar nearby Unitarian Capel y Groes at Llwynygroes, Llanwnnen, with which some of my family were also associated. According to , there also is or was one somewhere at Ciliau Aeron. Cheers Bjenks ( talk) 04:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. My name's Claudi Balaguer (User Capsot from the Catalan Wikipedia and Occitan Wikiccionari) I've just read your profile and since you're Welsh I suppose you know very well what are a minorized language and culture and maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... (I'm glad your culture and nation can provide people like Hywel Williams!) I'm a member of a Catalan association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to this moment because Catalan is not supported by a state even though our Association is working real hard. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT and/or sign the list of "Members and Supporters" that can be reached through the link inside the template. Thanks again/diolch for your attention, I wish you a wonderful, warm and sunny summer, take care! Capsot ( talk) 13:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I don't think you'd want me to comment at that AfD, as I'd be supporting (at best) a merge and redirect. (1) The fact that the article appeared at DYK is no bar against subsequent deletion or merger. (2) The article is mainly about his family history, not him. What there is about him boils down to a couple of lines, from only one source, and the fact that he doesn't claim the titles. That doesn't pass WP:BASIC for me, and I don't think there's a presumption on Wikipedia that pretenders to thrones or princely positions (especially non-claiming pretenders) are inherently notable. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 20:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Bencherlite. I understand your point. I know that contact has been made with Evan Vaughan Anwyl's son so perhaps more info will be available. Bye for now. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 04:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I have edited this page in a way that you may find - interesting. I hope that the page is now much more encyclopedic, better referenced, not depending so much on a single source, and reflecting the available scholarship much better. I will in any case be grateful for your comments - perhaps on the relevant talk page. Civis Romanus ( talk) 21:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for writing to let me know; your assistance is much appreciated. I'll have a look at your changes and make comments on the article talk page. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 05:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your reply. Might I point out that your comment on the talk page of Garth Celyn gave the real world identity of a Wikipedia editor, and that this is strongly discouraged by Wikipedia policies. Unless of course the editor concerned is happy with it. If she isn't, you might want to contact a friendly administrator to remove all record of the real world identity. Civis Romanus ( talk) 20:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I was not aware of that policy. Thanks for letting me know. She didn't really seem to be hiding her identity based on what was being submitted. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 21:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Banc Ty'nddôl (Penguelan) grave site-Cwmystwyth Mines 2003.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I will, again, mail the permission from Dr. Simon Timberlake, image author. For your reference, please refer to ticket [Ticket#2008112710004491] Banc Ty'nddôl sun-disc whereby he gave permission back in 2008 for all images on the page. Such a bother to have to keep providing this same information over and over again. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 11:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Banc Ty'nddôl (Penguelan) smelting site.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I will, again, mail the permission from Dr. Simon Timberlake, image author. For your reference, please refer to ticket [Ticket#2008112710004491] Banc Ty'nddôl sun-disc whereby he gave permission back in 2008 for all images on the page. Such a bother to have to keep providing this same information over and over again. ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 11:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Sh'w mae Geaugagrrl, missing you being around. Hope all is well with you and that you decide to contribute to the Welsh articles on Wikipedia again soon. Hwyl, Daicaregos ( talk) 08:28, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Annwyl Dai, Diolch i chi am ein geiriau caredig. Dwi yn methu Wiki Cymru golygu a dod yn ôl mor aml ag y gallaf. Yr wyf yn gobeithio fod popeth yn iawn i chi. Dydd Sul da i chi! ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 18:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:CometLoadOpencast-CopaHill June1995.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 00:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply

It was recently suggested that WikiProject Washington might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. -- Kumioko ( talk) 01:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 15:27, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, Kapohogrrl. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 01:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi I am a writer I cant find your email on the User Talk so I hope you get this. I am working on a cover design for a chrildrens book I have writen. May I use your photo of the white willow tree on the back of the cover of a book, you took the image of a white willow tree and placed here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bloedel_Reserve_Willow_Tree.jpg I have no money to buy the Image or anything yet, but If I can sell enough books I can pay you for it. If you allow me to use the image, how much do you feel is fair? I can't use put anyones name on the book, as there are no names in the story and the author remains nameless as well, the theme of the story is "that it is the message that is importand not the messenger", humility, so I wouldn't be able to use your name in it or mine or anyones, but the image would still be yours and there will only be 999 copies of the book with that image on it, it will be a limited edition...just you would be allowing it on a book. I wouldn't own it, it would still be yours, if you read the story I think it would explain what I mean.

PS I am a writer not an editor sorry for the spelling :) My name is Kevin and my email is motherearthisalive@gmail.com Please let me know If I may us this and if so how much I will pay, you have my word. I am all about Honour and It is such a beutiful Image.

Thanks

Kevin — Preceding unsigned comment added by A messenger like you ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumi-Taskbot ( talk) 19:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Kapohogrrl! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch ( talk) 04:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply

--super cool! thanks so much for the invite! sorry I'm late in responding ;-> see you on FB! -- ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 04:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 03:44, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

--super cool! thanks so much for the invite! sorry I'm late in responding and missed the event ;-> -- ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 18:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for considering. Maximilianklein ( talk) 18:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Kapohogrrl! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 01:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OberlinChurch_WAStateArchivesImage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Orlady ( talk) 18:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply

I have what I think may be a dilute blue-cream calico Ragamuffin which I adopted from a neighbor. I like your Ragdoll userbox and I wonder if you could make one for Ragamuffins. Thank you, -- Bluejay Young ( talk) 18:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC) reply

How about you try? Give it a go! -- ~ Geaugagrrl ^talk 20:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC) reply

	WIKI LOVES LIBRARIES 2013! You are invited to attend the upcoming "Wiki Loves Libraries" edit-athon. The event will be held from 2:30–4:30pm on Sunday, November 17, 2013 at the Vancouver Community Library (901 C Street) in Vancouver, Washington. The edit-athon will focus on creating and expanding articles related to Vancouver and Clark County. Details and signup here!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of WikiProjectOregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot ( talk) 15:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC) reply

This month, WikiProject Oregon features two photo campaigns:

• PDX Pods
• Christmas in Oregon

The concept is simple: upload photos of these two topics and share your work! Whether you upload one or one hundred, these images will help capture the culture of our state and illustrate Wikimedia projects. Have fun, and happy holiday season! You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of WikiProject Oregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered on behalf of Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland by EdwardsBot ( talk) 19:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Kapohogrrl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Out of no where, one of my new articles was just redirected to the subject's husband. I need help reversing the article and talk page redirect, please. If the article is not noteworthy, then it should be reviewed under that (speedy delete) criteria, right?

~ Kapohogrrl ^talk 23:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC) reply

You should probably talk to the person who made the edit first (@ Cabayi:). Also they did leave a reason in the edit summary, which is "REDIR to Ernest Vaughan, 7th Earl of Lisburne, from where the text was copied, where it's better sourced, and WP:BIOFAMILY" -- Terra ^{( talk)} 01:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Kapohogrrl, I saw your discussion with TerraCodes and decided to put in some time on your article Ernest Vaughan, 7th Earl of Lisburne. I've added sources from the London Gazette which allowed me to unravel some of your faulty claims about his military record. It also uncovered some problems with your contributions which, since you're not a frequent contributor, you may not be aware of.

• Copyright - most of the text in the article was lifted directly from thepeerage.com. (I'll add the templated message below to avoid mis-quoting the policy)
• Image copyright on Commons - the image you loaded for EV is clearly tagged as CC-BY-NC-ND, not the CC-BY-SA 4.0 which you claimed. Wikipedia can not accept a licence which does not allow derivative work.
• Inline sourcing is strongly preferred, not a bunch of sources tacked on to the end of the article.
• Irrelevant sources - the article cited the Dictionary of Welsh Biography. Their article ends with the THIRD Earl in 1831 and has no relevance to an article about the 7th Earl.
• When I look at your contributions on Commons, I see that you claim that you are the copyright owner of, and that Gerald Morgan is the author of, several images. Either you are Gerald Morgan, so citing your own book

• Morgan, Gerald (1997). A Welsh house and its family : the Vaughans of Trawsgoed : a study of the Vaughan family and estate through seven centuries. Llandysul, Ceredigion [Wales]: Gomer. ISBN  1859024726. OCLC  48038048.

is original research, or you're not Gerald Morgan and you've falsely licensed his images. Which is it?

Cabayi ( talk) 14:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello Cabayi, I am not new to Wikipedia, but apparently have "lost my way" (flubbed it) since editing very frequently in the past. Thanks for jumping in and trying to rescue (and keep on track) what I have posted so far in regards to the Earl and Countess of Lisburne family. I am in communications with Gerald Morgan (personal friend) and John Vaughan (younger brother of current Earl) and really do hope to make the best foot forward in what I post. I do mean to do a lot more editing on this family (Vaughan family of Trawsgoed) since they can reliably trace to 1200s on the same estate in Wales (Trawsgoed). I will do my best to clarify/cleanup what I have posted but I may need additional assistance. I do appreciate your reminders and guidance; I am committed to the Wiki-community and do aspire to make it perfectly accurate. Much appreciated ~ Kapohogrrl ^talk 01:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC) reply

There seems to be plenty there to keep you busy. The other material I came across seemed to portray his marriage to Regina as the major society event in the days just before WW1, but mostly couched in terms of "She's RICH!!". His son-in-law also served in the Welsh Guards in WW2 alongside & out-ranking Ernest - but it seemed a bit trivial for the article.

In case you should move on to writing about members of the family who are still alive I'd recommend you have a read of WP:BLP. It's an area of policy which has moved on and become more rigorously regulated over recent years. Good luck & happy editing. Cabayi ( talk) 08:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Cabayi; I have no intention of writing an article about living members of Vaughans of Trawsgoed for the BLP complexities, plus they do not wish it (I have already asked). I occasionally edit Wikis of the undead (Halloween pun), but only if it's glaring error such as grammar or tense. Soon I'll edit more now that the rains are finally setting in. Nothing better than hibernating and Wiki-ediitng. Cheers ~ Kapohogrrl ^talk 04:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello Kapohogrrl, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ernest Vaughan, 7th Earl of Lisburne have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cabayi ( talk) 14:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Please see my response, above. Many thanks ~ Kapohogrrl ^talk 01:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hello, Kapohogrrl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Kapohogrrl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) reply

The file File:NorwegianCrown Paris.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 10:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC) reply