< February 5 | February 7 > |
---|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Chick Bowen (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 02:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna ( talk) 22:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna ( talk) 22:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
If unpublished and anonymous, then the photo entered the public domain in the United States in 2004.
If unpublished but not anonymous, then the photo enters the public domain in the United States 70 years after it was taken (in 2019 at the latest). Stefan2 ( talk) 14:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Dianna ( talk) 22:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete, We don't have enough information to accurately determine the copyright status of this image, so it has to be deleted. The building still exists (it was not torn down in 1902 as claimed; it was constructed in 1902) and therefore a freely available image could readily be created. The building is at 1515 Lafayette St., Steilacoom and is visible on Google Street View. Dianna ( talk) 21:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply
< February 5 | February 7 > |
---|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Chick Bowen (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 02:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna ( talk) 22:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna ( talk) 22:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
If unpublished and anonymous, then the photo entered the public domain in the United States in 2004.
If unpublished but not anonymous, then the photo enters the public domain in the United States 70 years after it was taken (in 2019 at the latest). Stefan2 ( talk) 14:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Dianna ( talk) 22:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete, We don't have enough information to accurately determine the copyright status of this image, so it has to be deleted. The building still exists (it was not torn down in 1902 as claimed; it was constructed in 1902) and therefore a freely available image could readily be created. The building is at 1515 Lafayette St., Steilacoom and is visible on Google Street View. Dianna ( talk) 21:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply