The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as seems unlikely to meet
WP:GNG, let alone
WP:NCORP. ProQuest turns up only a couple of hits which turn out to be passing mentions in trade journals. Article serves as nothing more than a product catalog at this point; it managed to survive with zero references for nearly 16 years.
Cielquiparle (
talk)
13:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as seems unlikely to meet
WP:GNG, let alone
WP:NCORP. ProQuest turns up only a couple of hits which turn out to be passing mentions in trade journals. Article serves as nothing more than a product catalog at this point; it managed to survive with zero references for nearly 16 years.
Cielquiparle (
talk)
13:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.