- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Adrián Macías
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}}; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}}. |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adrián Macías ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The PROD by CommanderWaterford and Spiderone was removed by an IP. My search of English and Spanish language sources found no significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC. There is only passing coverage about Macías and a few quotes from Macías in the odd news article (e.g. El Diario and NIUS), but the articles don't talk about him in any detail. — MarkH21 talk 13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 talk 13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 talk 13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 talk 13:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, No signs of notability per WP:BIO or WP:GNG CommanderWaterford ( talk) 13:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I double checked the sources in the article. Unfortunately none of them meet GNG. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 13:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing in my searches other than the same passing mentions, which do not add up to passing GNG/BASIC. Possible weak redirect to
Virus Matemático but I'm not sure that that is essential and would almost definitely be reverted by the article creator (who I presume is the same as the IP editor).
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
13:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Even the passing mentions only say that Macías is a member of the group (e.g.
Adrián Macías, otro de los miembros de este colectivo
from NIUS), rather than a leader or otherwise redirect-worthy figure. — MarkH21 talk 13:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Hi! Articles speak about him in detail. You could read and make a work about him. Not just because of Wikipedia, but the intention is to explain that Adrián was 1 of the founders of virus matemático.-- Remitbuber ( talk) 14:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE — MarkH21 talk 15:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Even the passing mentions only say that Macías is a member of the group (e.g.
sock !votes
|
|---|
|
- Delete WP:ARTSPAM that fails to meet WP:GNG inclusion requirements including WP:ANYBIO -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Personal testimonials ≠ reliable sources, though I suppose they are appropriate for advertising. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - in addition to a lack of notability, this is part of a suspicious editing pattern. Deb ( talk) 17:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete GNG-failing subject that was part of a math-awareness promotional campaign.--- Possibly ( talk) 20:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The provided sources do not suggest that WP:GNG is met, and I find nothing else to suggest that the subject is notable. -- Kinu t/ c 20:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleteas per nominator no WP GNG Aloolkaparatha ( talk) 09:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Adrián Macías
|
| If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}}; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}}. |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adrián Macías ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The PROD by CommanderWaterford and Spiderone was removed by an IP. My search of English and Spanish language sources found no significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC. There is only passing coverage about Macías and a few quotes from Macías in the odd news article (e.g. El Diario and NIUS), but the articles don't talk about him in any detail. — MarkH21 talk 13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 talk 13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 talk 13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 talk 13:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, No signs of notability per WP:BIO or WP:GNG CommanderWaterford ( talk) 13:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I double checked the sources in the article. Unfortunately none of them meet GNG. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 13:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing in my searches other than the same passing mentions, which do not add up to passing GNG/BASIC. Possible weak redirect to
Virus Matemático but I'm not sure that that is essential and would almost definitely be reverted by the article creator (who I presume is the same as the IP editor).
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
13:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Even the passing mentions only say that Macías is a member of the group (e.g.
Adrián Macías, otro de los miembros de este colectivo
from NIUS), rather than a leader or otherwise redirect-worthy figure. — MarkH21 talk 13:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Hi! Articles speak about him in detail. You could read and make a work about him. Not just because of Wikipedia, but the intention is to explain that Adrián was 1 of the founders of virus matemático.-- Remitbuber ( talk) 14:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE — MarkH21 talk 15:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Even the passing mentions only say that Macías is a member of the group (e.g.
sock !votes
|
|---|
|
- Delete WP:ARTSPAM that fails to meet WP:GNG inclusion requirements including WP:ANYBIO -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Personal testimonials ≠ reliable sources, though I suppose they are appropriate for advertising. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - in addition to a lack of notability, this is part of a suspicious editing pattern. Deb ( talk) 17:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete GNG-failing subject that was part of a math-awareness promotional campaign.--- Possibly ( talk) 20:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The provided sources do not suggest that WP:GNG is met, and I find nothing else to suggest that the subject is notable. -- Kinu t/ c 20:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleteas per nominator no WP GNG Aloolkaparatha ( talk) 09:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.