Hi, it's good that you added nominations for few years. But where is the source for the years other than the current year. -- Commander _{(Ping Me)} 13:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Do you have sources for Filmfare Best Actor-Tamil nominations. If so add it to the article. -- Commander _{(Ping Me)} 13:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	For maintaining South Indian films related articles. Keep up the good work :-) Karthik Nadar ( talk) 11:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I Will expand the article once I get time, as I'm a bit occupied with other work. -- Commander _{(Ping Me)} 04:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, I've had a long desire to expand and elevate articles such as Mouna Raagam, Nayakan and Thalapathi. However, finding sources for them is really a challenging task. These films deserve a great place in the history of Tamil cinema and have a lot of potential. To do that we need to collaborate, without which it's not going to be that easy. — Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 18:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for creating and expanding the article of S. N. Lakshmi. Appreciating your diligence in making a article to a legendary actress. Keep up the good work!! Ason27 ( talk) 13:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC) reply

I am planning to take the article to GA status. Pls have a look at it; any suggestions for improvement? ---- Kailash29792 ( talk) 06:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Editor 2050, I think u can copy-edit it to some extent. Kailash29792 ( talk) 05:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Never mind, the article has passed its GA review. Kailash29792 ( talk) 14:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I know you are an excellent editor and keep all (at least the majority of) Tamil film articles up-to-date. But please remember one thing: please try to avoid using the term "roped in" as it sounds slangy. Also, do please remember to clear your talk page of unnecessary conversations so that navigation is easier. Kailash29792 ( talk) 13:03, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Recently you made this edit on the Kochadaiiyaan page. Your addition of information is much appreciated but could you please also add the necessary citations to the references from where you got the info? Thanks and peace! NiR _insanity 10:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, I don't think the film got a theatrical release. — Vensatry _(Ping) 14:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Oh, saw some news regarding a potential release and saw it listed on the Tamil films of 2001 page. I'm not certain either. It's also up on YouTube, with a censor certificate, completed version et all. Editor 2050 ( talk) 14:49, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Quite confusing! I've come across a few Tamil movie forums all saying the film is yet to have a theatrical release. Interestingly Vairamuthu has written all the songs. I thought IR and Vairamuthu never worked together after Punnagai Mannan (1986). — Vensatry _(Ping) 15:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply

User:Chanderforyou has deleted a lot of content from Rana (film), claiming that the sources are "not reliable". Can u please restore the info with alternative sources, or try convincing him? I failed in both. Kailash29792 ( talk) 11:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, just looked at the changes, and don't really agree with them. But then again I'm not really sure if Rana should have a page at the moment anyone - Lingaa seems to be an entirely different venture. Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC) reply

I too initially felt Rana should not have a separate article due to its currently shelved status and nominated it for deletion, although the consensus was to keep because the film stalled during principal photography. Kailash29792 ( talk) 02:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Please check the references before you Redirect it, the references have all the information with photos including the film's audio launch. This might be a small film, that does n't mean that it is not qualified for wikipedia. Please do not redirect/revert the edit. Rajeshbieee ( talk) 12:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC) reply

New references added - indiaglitz

Rajeshbieee ( talk) 07:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, since you have been on Wikipedia for quite a few years, I think you are familiar with the concept of Good and Featured articles. Currently, Gemini (2002 Tamil film) is a FAC (featured article candidate) and I think you would like to post your comments on the FAC page. Kailash29792 ( talk) 08:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Oh say, can you at least say something? Even a negative reply is not bad, but ignorance feels impolite. Kailash29792 ( talk) 17:38, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi! Thanks for your comments and they have been solved. By the way, is there more to come? Coz, you never said whether you support or oppose the FAC. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 04:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC) reply

And great job creating those two articles. That was quick!! -- Sriram ^{speak up} 04:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your comments on Gemini's FAC. They all appear to have been solved. Kailash29792 ( talk) 19:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Once again, thank you for the support tag. Kailash29792 ( talk) 10:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, I have nominated Chandralekha (1948 film) for FA status, and it is my first FAC. Feel free to post comments on the FAC page. Kailash29792 ( talk) 13:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, do you have any intention on creating articles on Sreedhar Pillai and Film News Anandan? Because they are film experts, and content published by them in any media should be acceptable (SP uses Twitter). Kailash29792 ( talk) 16:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Potentially soon, the latter definitely needs an article. Editor 2050 ( talk) 16:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Before removing the maintenance tags discuss the issue on the talk pages of interested users. Arjann ( talk) 16:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi! I have nominated the list for FLC and I invite you to review the nomination and suggest improvements, if any. Here is the nomination page. Thanks. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 06:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

I have replied for some of your comments and working on the rest. Are there more to come? -- Sriram ^{speak up} 17:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC) reply

I have opened the peer review for the film. Please do suggest any changes that I should make before I go for FAC. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Good Job ArasiArul ( talk) 04:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Okay so on the new page feed I found U. K. Senthil Kumar, are you sure that's the guys name or shouldn't it be something like Senthil Kumar (cinematographer) instead? Wgolf ( talk) 19:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC) reply

He has been credited under this name - should be fine. It's merely an initial. Editor 2050 ( talk) 19:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Aww okay-you might want to add a hat note also. Wgolf ( talk) 20:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC) reply

If you can do some cleanup on that page using this existing source, it would be great. Kailash29792 ( talk) 17:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. I've observed that you have moved the page Untitled Vamsi Paidipally project to Dosth (film). But, reliable sources are stating that the makers are keen to name the film as Dosth. Any explanation from your side is appreciated. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 01:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

I don't think Wikipedia articles should have information on rumors as, according to this policy, "Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content." You can also use gadgets like Twinkle and ProveIt to ease editing. Kailash29792 ( talk) 04:58, 19 September 2015 (UTC) reply

After I saw your recent edits on Thanga Magan (2015), I'll tell you this again: please do not add informaion on rumours, as they are unencyclopedic. Kailash29792 ( talk) 15:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, I appreciate your efforts for creating articles of not so familiar directors who did two or three films. Please do create more articles, for example G. Marimuthu, A. Govindamurthy, Manivasagam and Thakkali Srinivasan. Srivin ( talk) 15:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I've tended to concentrate on artistes/technicians who were at some point widely reported in the press - or those who have done a minimum of three films. The latter two are articles I will make at some point. Editor 2050 ( talk) 17:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, I think this one might be a dubbed version of either Tales of The Kama Sutra: The Perfumed Garden or Khajuraho. He did direct the latter. — Vensatry _(ping) 17:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, nope. There are reports of a "trilingual film" titled Kaama / Kama Tantra in production during 1999: here and here. Also the Telugu version of the film with the director's son Vishal, Urvasi, Sunila in the lead, and a solo song from Deepti Bhatnagar thrown in with little relevance to the plot - can be found here. It seems to have hit the screens rather quietly in 1999, after a run in with the censors. Khajuraho also featuring Vishal, but with Mamta Kulkarni and Sadhika, seems to be something else as per this. Funnily enough, a YouTube search suggests that the same, standalone Deepti Bhatnagar song was also used in the film, as per here. Editor 2050 ( talk) 19:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Fair enough! So it's safe to assume that the film never hit the screens per this source? — Vensatry _(ping) 06:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Um, that article suggests that news about the film suddenly diminished - but this states it as a released film. It must have had a super low-key release. Editor 2050 ( talk) 10:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Please kindly redirect Nawab Narkali (1972 film) with Nawab Naarkali. Srivin ( talk) 12:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Sure. How come you didn't want to do it? Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply

See the problem is I do not know how to redirecting despite reading the rules I have failed while doing for some articles and also please redirect Thai Moogambikai with Thaai Mookaambikai. Thanks. Srivin ( talk) 12:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Appreciate your efforts! :) Chitreshraj ( talk) 12:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Dear Editor 2050 : Wanted to inform you about a change in Heebah Patel Article, where few of the external source of the article call it as Hebah Patel. Please check below link. Edit1702 ( talk) 16:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC) reply

• http://www.ibtimes.co.in/hebah-patel-says-kumari-21f-coming-age-love-story-655235
• http://www.financialprospect.com/entertainment/kumari-21f-censor-report-and-hebah-patels-interview-11446.html

Latest news on the film's production and title. Please update the article with this because my net is down. Kailash29792 ( talk) 17:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

It's a generic site. Your net is down, eh? :S Editor 2050 ( talk) 19:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

I request you not to retitle Enthiran 2 (film) by simply cutting and pasting. Using Twinkle, I have tagged 2.0 (film) for deletion, and once it is deleted, Enthiran 2 (film) can be moved to that title. Kailash29792 ( talk) 12:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Sure, brilliant. Cheers. Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC) reply

An update about the film's title, though its credibility may be questioned. Kailash29792 ( talk) 11:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Nice, but yes credibility is most definitely questioned. Looks like a blog of sorts. It's probably best to keep track of [1], [2] and [3] for the moment. Editor 2050 ( talk) 11:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC) reply

bro ... one scene movies we mentioned in career... so pls stop adding one scene movies in her filmography ... -- Calicutspecialist ( talk) 09:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC) reply

bro m trying hard to improve parvathy nair article ... pls help me on this... -- Calicutspecialist ( talk) 16:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Calicutspecialist: Just try to make the article less biased towards her, though I know you maintain close contact with her. Kailash29792 ( talk) 16:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Kailash29792: bro we mentioned all films in her career ...but when adding one scene movies in filmography it wil be a reason to lose the focus of main important films ... I m sure if we add all one scene movies in every other actors filmography there will be many movies .... so its important to remove unnoticed one scene movies frm filmography ... It wil definitely help to improve Wikipedia.. thank you .. -- Calicutspecialist ( talk) 03:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Calicutspecialist: The actress has done about a dozen films - one scene "guest appearances" in prestigious projects (NN and it's remake) hardly lose any focus. Also every other actor do have their "one scene movies" included. Editor 2050 ( talk) 14:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC) reply

I support Editor 2050's decision. And in the filmography section, we can even acknowledge her small roles as "cameo appearances". Kailash29792 ( talk) 15:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Kailash29792: Looks like Calicutspecialist has given away his own sockpuppet [4] - the same fella who set up this almost a year ago [5]. Sigh. Editor 2050 ( talk) 16:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Calicutspecialist no doubt behaves very much like Abhinand. But when I asked Parvathy (I do not mean to violate WP:COI) if she knows Calicutspecialist personally, she said she does not. If you have Twinkle installed, you can file a SPI case and present evidence of Abhinand's sockpuppetry if any. Kailash29792 ( talk) 16:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Aiyo. Cheers anyway, poor Parvathy. Let's see how it pans out. Editor 2050 ( talk) 16:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Just spotted her account, there does seem to be an Abhinand who leaves comments on pretty much every post. Big fan, I guess. Editor 2050 ( talk) 16:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC) reply

More than "big fan", he seems to be a stalker. I never wished to get entangled into this mess, so I will remove Parvathy Nair from my watchlist and cease editing it (except improve the prose when necessary). Although Parvathy claims that User:Josu4u has been editing articles about her films disruptively, I checked his edits and they seem to have a point (such as billing a cast list according to a press release). He has been active for quite a few years and has even won a few barnstars, so I guess he is a reasonably respectable and honest editor. I don't see why both Parvathy and Abhinand should oppose his edits; probably because they speak out against her. Kailash29792 ( talk) 16:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Since this is not my subject I figured you might want to look into this: https://en.wikipedia.org/?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Magipur&namespace=&tagfilter=&newOnly=1&year=2016&month=-1 Wgolf ( talk) 01:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Bollywood's not my area - but sigh, it does look like it's been ongoing for a while. I'm surprised all those earlier articles managed to survive. Not quite sure where to start. Editor 2050 ( talk) 01:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Okay well-I did put up some prods already! Wgolf ( talk) 01:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

What do you think of this section in the article? I created it, but I think it needs expansion and c/e. Kailash29792 ( talk) 19:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Sure, seems like an important section. I did the prose for the rest a few years back and I did ponder a similar section at the time - with subsections for his female characters, music & poetic titles. Not sure if I've got it saved somewhere. I'll c/e + add either way soon. Editor 2050 ( talk) 20:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi there, your edit here at Irudhi Suttru is problematic for a few reasons. For starters, you attempt to summarize the entirety of critical response without attributing that summary to a specific voice. It is not our place to cherrypick reviews and then summarize those cherrypicked reviews. Secondly, "highly positive reviews" is meaningless promotional fluff, and I can only assume you mean "widespread acclaim", rather than critics fainting in the aisles because of how great they think the film is. But even then, you'd have to attribute the summary to a specific voice. I'll also point out that your addition of "Behindwoods.com also gave the film a very positive review" is entirely absurd, considering they gave the film 3.25 stars out of 5. I'm not sure why you'd interpret a middle-of-the-road review as "very positive", but it reeks of promotional editing and this will not be tolerated. Same with your unsubstantiated statement that the dub of the film received "[unanimous praise for] the lead pair's performances." Completely inappropriate hyperbolic nonsense. Who decided it was unanimous? You? Also, did you even try to find a negative review to present a balanced picture? Surely someone must have had some negative criticism about the film's pacing, tone, cinematography, etc? Content needs to be written in a neutral point of view, not focus entirely on the rosy reviews. It is academically dishonest to only present one side when writing about subjective topics. Stick to presenting balanced information, please, not summarizing and editorializing, as you will quickly find your editing privileges revoked if your edits are again found to be promotional in nature or contrary to established Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Cyphoidbomb - Woah, woah, woah. Such a dramatic message. I understand where my writing on that article borders on excessive praise, but it really is reflected on the sources given. I'm not sure how familiar you are with the Tamil film industry - but the film has indeed received glowing reviews, comparatively to other films. Behindwoods.com, a reputable source for that matter, usually do not give films ratings above 2.75 stars. Comments like Completely inappropriate hyperbolic nonsense and you will quickly find your editing privileges revoked if your edits are again found to be promotional in nature or contrary are extreme to say the least. Editor 2050 ( talk) 17:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC) reply

As a matter of fact, if I found any negative review, I would definitely add it to the section, if it was from a reputable source and contained useful facts. Kailash29792 ( talk) 17:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Did you know that you can create draft articles for up-and-coming subjects? This can work well especially for films that are yet to commence filming. Kailash29792 ( talk) 07:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Yes, haha. I have done that for a bunch of films in my sandbox over the last few years. Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Arnav19 reported by User:Kailash29792 (Result: ). The filer of the report, User:Kailash29792, asserts that User:Arnav19 is creating articles on dubbed soap operas, and this is contrary to usual practice. There is nothing in the report that would allow me to confirm that it's against our practice. Do you know more about how we handle dubbed TV shows, and do you have an opinion on this? Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I guess her "fan" - User:Abhinand1234 is back to manipulating the article according to her desires, through a new account: User:Megamohan. What do you think? Kailash29792 ( talk) 06:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I hoped that improving the page would stop all that. Obviously not. Editor 2050 ( talk) 11:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply

What I asked was, do you think Abhinand is back through a new account? Do you think I should file a SPI case? Kailash29792 ( talk) 13:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Sure, go for it. Editor 2050 ( talk) 15:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply

hello (Vanakkam) please do not disambiguation for serial ( Balaganapathy & Bala Ganapathy (TV series) it's a different language serial and balaganapathy popular Malayalam soap opera that launched on Asianet and Bala Ganapathy (TV series) is a Tamil soap opera that aired on STAR Vijay. -- Arnav19 ( talk) 21:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I have a physical copy of Conversations. If you want, I can share the pages with you, and that could help you expand the remainder of Ratnam's film articles as you've been doing of late. The book I have, however, does not include Kadal or OK Kanmani. Kailash29792 ( talk) 08:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Cheers, sounds like a good idea. I'm slowly looking to polish them all - especially the early ones. OK Kanmani is as good as done. Editor 2050 ( talk) 00:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Here are the pages for Mouna Ragam and Roja. Though the former is already a GA, an FAC is being planned (and several pages from the book don't seem to have been used), and the pages for the other films will be uploaded soon. Kailash29792 ( talk) 06:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, WP:FILEUPLOADWIZARD can be used to upload the poster https://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AE%AA%E0%AE%9F%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AE%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%8D:Aaaah-2014-Movie-Poster.jpg In ictu oculi ( talk) 17:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi there. I hate to bring this to your attention considering your experience editing at Wikipedia, but your edit here at Irudhi Suttru where you state that the film received critical acclaim, is unsourced. We are not permitted to draw our own conclusions about subjective matters like critical response, and then add that content to articles and present them as facts. That should be left to professionals, and such summaries should be directly quoted. The change you made is also in conflict with a summary further down in the article that describes the critical response as mixed and is supported by this reference. Frankly, I'm not a huge fan of summarizing critical response as well, so there is always the option to leave it out. (Although in this case, removing a sourced summary wouldn't be very useful.) Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi Editor 2050, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Nakon 04:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

That the film will be made as a trilingual is a rumour. It's very unlikely that the film will even be dubbed into Malayalam. It happened with OKK too. — Vensatry _(talk) 06:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Yes, cheers - I know that. Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:00, 14 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Do you think her article name should simply be "Raadhika"? Because she was famous even long before her marriage to Sarathkumar, and was for long referred to by her first name only; she still is. Kailash29792 ( talk) 09:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Yes, it should be just Raadhika. Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:00, 14 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi there, in this edit you reordered a cast list without providing an explanation consistent with established guidelines (i.e. WP:FILMCAST). Can you explain your rationale in the future, please? This tends to look like a completely arbitrary change, like one made to match our personal preference. To give you some context, a year or so ago there were two editors fighting about whether Mammootty or Mohanlal should be placed first in cast lists. It was absurd. This is why we have guidelines for this sort of thing. Additionally, you removed the character description that Paraman is Anbuselvi's father. Was there a reason for this? We're not limited to only listing the character's name. Context helps readers understand the relationships between characters, which would be important if, say, someone was reading a plot summary. It would be appreciated if you'd please use edit summaries with all your edits--this is a collaborative project, and communication with other editors is crucial. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Sure - this was re-arranged as per the credits from the start of the film. The character description was removed purely for consistency with most other Tamil film Wikipedia articles. I guess a consensus could be reached at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. Editor 2050 ( talk) 19:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

I appreciate the explanation on the ordering. I'll leave it alone. Consensus already exists for inclusion of brief character descriptions at WP:TVCAST. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, please note an article can only be prodded once in its lifetime as per WP:PROD, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

This candidate is open since the first of September. It could gain benefit from few constructive comments. Would you like to provide some? Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 08:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

It would be naive to say that the nationality of the majority of the cast decides the nationality of the film itself. It is the production studio that decides the film's nationality, but I think people here don't see it the same way. E.g.: Slumdog Millionaire has a largely Indian cast, but was produced by a UK studio, hence it does not qualify as an Indian film. As for any Tamil film produced by the UK-based Ayngaran International, what do you think? Kailash29792 ( talk) 06:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Films by Ayngaran are more widely released and marketed in India for Indian audiences, rather than in the UK for British audiences. Interesting question - but I feel that the "release and marketing" strategy is the prime decider in this scenario. Editor 2050 ( talk) 10:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi there, re: this edit, you do realize that The Hindu doesn't say that the film is only being shot in Tamil as you assert, right? It identifies the film as a Tamil science fiction film, but I think we both know that could very well be because The Hindu is identifying what industry it came from. I don't have an interest in changing it, I just needed to point out that the conclusion you drew is not explicitly stated by the reference. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. I'm sure there will be more clarity when a poster releases - but like the previous film - this will merely be a Tamil film dubbed and simultaneously released into Hindi and Telugu. Making readers believe it will be anything other than that is incorrect. Most of those sources that have been listed ie.indianexpress.com - have most likely taken the information from this incorrect piece of information on the Wikipedia page. Oh well. Editor 2050 ( talk) 10:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I wish they knew about the concept of fruit of the poisonous tree: "If an otherwise reliable source attributes information to an unreliable source then that information is likewise unreliable." And Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source. Kailash29792 ( talk) 10:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The trilingual content came from a reliable source that said explicitly that the film was being shot in three languages. [6] And as far as I can remember, this information predated the content in the article because we didn't know what languages to add until the source came out. Prior to that source, the film was being described as bilingual per this reference. Or at least that's what I remember. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hmm. Again these sources most likely got the information from speculation - none are from interviews and so forth. Shankar's recent films (note Enthiran, Nanban and I) are exclusively made in Tamil but are released in Hindi/Telugu on the same day. Even though the first look releases next month - I wouldn't be surprised if the first look reveals different versions of the film, as if it had been shot in different languages (like the completely Tamil Kaashmora had done in Kannada, Malayalam and Telugu [7] and the completely Malayalam Ezra has done in several languages [8]). I am sure an interview confirming such will trickle through eventually. Editor 2050 ( talk) 22:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, Manisha Yadav is not a part of Kaashmora movie. Pls do not add her in cast. Thanks. Kathir 15:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zkathir ( talk • contribs)

Zkathir, okay sure - you may want to ask Think Music India to stop being misleading in their description section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8leeiLJP0I Editor 2050 ( talk) 15:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Please merge Ezhuthappurangal and Manjupeyyum Munpe. Srivin ( talk) 14:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Why? They are different. Also, you could just do it yourself. Editor 2050 ( talk) 14:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I don't know how to do, actually I wanted to say merge Ezhuthappurangal with Ezhuthapurangal and Manjupeyyum Munpe with Ammayi Bagundi. Srivin ( talk) 16:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Howdy, re: this edit, as a general FYI, the 2 column switch for {{ reflist}} been deprecated and disabled for mobile view. Community preference is that individual browsers should determine the number of columns based on screen size, rather than the page dictating an inflexible 2 columns for every browser/window configuration. "30em" is the standard default. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, not to get on your case today, but I also happened to notice this edit where you summarized a film's critical response without providing a reference. Though I know you mean well, these sorts of statements really need to come from a reliable published source. Western film articles typically get aggregation summaries from RottenTomatoes and Metacritic. I know it's a problem for Indian film since the ICTF has not agreed on a suitable equivalent to these sources, but it's problematic if we attempt to summarize them ourselves for a couple of reasons:

1. If we happen upon an article that has three positive reviews, we're taking a risk by summarizing that selection as positive because we might be unwittingly reinforcing someone's selection bias. If someone from the film's marketing department only posted positive reviews and we come in and say "the reception was mostly positive", that's entirely made up and may not reflect reality.
2. If the summary doesn't come from a specific voice, someone could easily come along, add more negative reviews and re-summarize. It becomes a magnet for bias and promotion/demotion.
3. We might be reinforcing our own biases. If I didn't like a movie, I might be less than earnest about trying to find positive reviews, and my resulting summary might accidentally reflect my own bias.

The matter has been discussed numerous times at WT:FILM and it seems fairly clear (per MOS:FILM#Film#Critical response) that the community requires these summaries to be attributed to reliable sources. Thanks and sorry for the hassle. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC) reply

How do you know, that an upcoming film will be notable? Isn't it a promotion? Xx236 ( talk) 12:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The film is in production. It also features a notable leading actor and technical crew. Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Do reliable sources claim the film will be notable? Which India sources are notable I don't know. (In Poland sources about film do promotion rather than inform.)

No Tamil page? Xx236 ( talk) 12:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

It has been featured in the two leading Indian newspapers [9] and [10] and this has direct quotes [11]. Also, just trust me, I have created 750+ articles on Tamil films. Editor 2050 ( talk) 12:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Why only here, not in the Tamil Wikipedia? Xx236 ( talk) 12:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Tamil wikipedia is far smaller, for the moment. Plus, I do not have easy access to Tamil font. It will be hopefully adapted in the weeks/months to come. Editor 2050 ( talk) 13:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I don't know much about Tamil culture, but in Poland many people are post-colonialist, they care about opinions of foreigners, Oscar prize and others. Xx236 ( talk) 13:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello Editor 2050. Thanks for all the fine work you're doing on Tamil film articles. I notice that you've been populating the category "Tamil sequel films" today. If you weren't already aware, you might find Wikipedia:HotCat useful for this. Hope that's useful, Wikishovel ( talk) 15:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Now that the project has been revived with Chiyaan, you may want to edit it to look better and more neutral. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Please don't add the names until you find reliable sources. — Vensatry _(talk) 15:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi again, what's up with this reordering? What guideline is being followed here if the film hasn't been released yet (and thus, the onscreen credits can't be verified) and the theatrical poster doesn't have a billing block? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC) reply

True. It was merely a presumption that Anushka gets the top billing considering her presence in the previous films, her leading role as Suriya's wife and her billing over Hansika Motwani in Singam II (another "second lead heroine"). Editor 2050 ( talk) 23:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Ehh, this has been changed numerous times without any rationale and the changes are not particularly constructive. It'd be appreciated if you'd please avoid these arbitrary changes. There are too many people's personal preferences and opinions to satisfy, which I think I've brought up before. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Sorry, what? The changes I made retracted those so-called "personal preferences and opinions" you mention. If you hadn't noticed, I cleaned the article up from the garbage that had previously existed - which you obviously must have forgotten to bring up before. Editor 2050 ( talk) 14:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply

It has begun filming. Courtesy, News Today. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 04:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The standard of the article is poor. It reads like a gossip site with peacock terms. Editor 2050 ( talk) 10:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Actually I restored the page with the source added. The rest is up to you. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Can you help me find verified YT links or other news/web sources for the following comment from Vensatry at FLC: "Role still missing for Minsara Kanna, Shahjahan, Pokkiri and ATM. Saravanan (for Villu) and Pulivendhan (for Puli) aren't verified in the sources." Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

• Hi Ssven2 - [12], [13], [14] and [15]. Also [16] (seems legit - used in other GAs / Indiaglitz.com also has proof) and [17]. All the best. Editor 2050 ( talk) 13:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi again, re: this edit, you removed the summary of the film's critical response as "positive". Any reason? It had been sourced. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

I want to remove the redirect and develop the article on the series. What is your opinion? PhysicsScientist ( talk) 13:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Sure, go for it. Definitely notable enough. Editor 2050 ( talk) 18:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The article has been created. Anyone is free to improve it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC) reply

You could use scripts to ease your editing. Copy some from this page to this to enable them. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC) reply

It is chaotic that the Indian media does not preserve information on character names in Indian films. But it is better to cite the film itself as source for the character name, eg: {{cite AV media | people=Fouladkar, Assad (Director) | date=May 15, 2003 | title=Lamma hikyit Maryam | trans_title = When Maryam Spoke Out | medium=Motion picture | location=Lebanon | publisher=Fouladkar, Assad}}. For more help, please see Template:Cite AV media. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Kailash29792 Hi, I added a few verified links under the format you followed on the Ajith Kumar filmography page. But wait - why does each "name" need to be cited? In the Ajith article you have mostly reverted to this link [18] - which is just a brief summary of his films without any character names mentioned. Likewise Ramachandran's book on Rajinikanth does not feature any comprehensive list of character names wither. Editor 2050 ( talk) 18:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Can you please stop messing up the table? 'Raja's friend' is not a name; one might wonder who the heck is the guy (Raja)? Use common sense before reverting again. — Vensatry _(talk) 17:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Vensatry - Messing up the table, eh? That sounds a lot like you. Please use common sense and stop behaving inconsistently with different articles. You have gone through removing sourced information without thinking twice. Just having a look at "your" previous featured filmographies:

• Terms like "local school chairman", "himself" and even the hideous and lazy "unknown" seem to make the cut on the Rajinikanth page. Ramachandran's book doesn't even cite half the character names - yet you have found it perfect to go ahead with "unsourced" information.
• Ajith Kumar's page casually states that he is "Shashi's co-passenger". Well, one may think, who is Shashi? Well, they just have to click on the page/link they are staring at to find out.
• The recent Dhanush submission also has "himself" noted - even after you chose to go ahead and remove it from Kamal Haasan's table.

You seem to have a clear vendetta or you're just behaving deliberately inconsistent. I clearly remind you that this isn't a race to get as many featured lists as you want to have / add as many stars to your user page as you wish. Please look for accurate and clear completion, first. Editor 2050 ( talk) 17:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Race? If that was my sole aim, I would not have disagreed with you at all. Besides, I have already made it clear that I'm not willing to nominate/co-nominate the list (despite being the top contributor). I don't think any of the current editors in India are giving a tough fight to me as far as WP:FL is concerned. So all these are only going to make your accusations laughable. But before deciding on who's right, can we strive to ensure that the status quo is maintained? Not sure if I was the one who added the "local school chairman" bit in Rajini's page (I'm guessing that it was Ssven2/Kailash29792). Yes, these changes should reflect in other pages too. If you are too keen to change them, go ahead and make the necessary changes. All that said, agree with the 'himself' part. It seems you are deliberately violating WP:V. If this behaviour continues, be ready to face blocks. — Vensatry _(talk) 18:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Vensatry - Wait, wow. I'm deliberately avoiding WP:V - despite adding all those verified YouTube links? Well, you seem to have incorrectly assumed that Ramachandran's book has all of Rajinikanth's character names listed - and then gone ahead and used it as a mass source. I should probably head to that page and remove all the character names - as none of them actually have a verifiable source. Is that okay? Should I do that? Would that be maintaining the status quo too? Editor 2050 ( talk) 18:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Well, this was you: [19]. Now tell me how is this not a deliberate violation of WP:V. As I said earlier, it's not a case of WP:OBVIOUS. Btw, where have I stated that Naman's book has the character names of all his films? It has been used wherever it was deemed applicable, not as a 'mass' source as you claim. To answer your final point, the list would not have passed the FLC if that was the case; it was scrutinized by editors who are at least ten times better than you at reviewing. What makes me even more surprising is that you fail to see the column being supported by YT links and Naman's book. — Vensatry _(talk) 18:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Vensatry - How is that exactly violating WP:V? That was done because her name was removed without explanation. You cannot legitimately expect a film reviewer to list the name of every single character in their review - especially those who appear briefly on-screen. Now, tell me, how would you source that? I doubt any of those editors had access to Naman's incomplete book or were anal enough to scream for sources for each and every film from the 1970s! (while proceeding to insert their made up own character names - "Zamindar?" [20]) The column has 12 links to YT out of 160 Rajinikanth films. Let's say about 20 have been covered by the modern media and have online reviews. What about the rest? How will one ever know that Rajini was actually called Murugan in Kavikkuyil (1977)? Editor 2050 ( talk) 18:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Your claim smacks of naivety. You're editing here for six years without even getting the basics right, but I'm not surprised. The guideline clearly states that, even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. Further, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. REPEAT: it lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and not with the one who removes it. Simply put, if you're unable to find sources for a claim it shouldn't be added. Is it that hard to understand? As for Naman's book, I'm sure you haven't read it. The book has the summaries of many of his films. In case of Kavikkuyil, isn't it clear that the film (and character name) is cited using 'Chapter: 1977' of the book? Care to check the free preview in Google Books? I own that book in my kindle. Not sure what your problem is. — Vensatry _(talk) 05:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Oh my. Cool. I used an incorrect example there. I will go through and edit out any unsourced material. "Your claim smacks of naivety. You're editing here for six years without even getting the basics right, but I'm not surprised" - right, okay, cool. Also things like "stage actor", "roadside singer", "Babu's son" are ACTUALLY FINE when looking at featured lists like Brad Pitt filmography, Jessica Chastain on screen and stage or Charlize Theron filmography. That was the main problem I had with your activity - the insistence to take away material which helps pages look and feel more complete - anyway, it's up to you now. I wish you all the best on your process of accumulating badges and stars to your home page to make it look pretty and feel self-accomplishing. Editor 2050 ( talk) 09:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply

I'm at total loss here. If demonstrating the importance of WP:V and WP:BURDEN makes me irresponsible/inconsistent (in your dictionary), I'm happy to be categorised as one. Second, how on the earth are my actions going to ease the FLC process (so that I can accumulate badges to my user page)? Care to explain? As far as I can see, it's only to make it tougher. All that I can say is read WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:OSE. Re I wish you all the best on your process of accumulating badges and stars to your home page to make it look pretty and feel self-accomplishing.: Sure, but that shouldn't be a problem for you, isn't it? Clear symptoms of WP:BSI. — Vensatry _(talk) 11:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello:

I am undertaking a copy edit of this article for Kailash29792. I wonder, as a courtesy, if you would mind not making edits to it until I am finished and have removed the GOCE In Use tag at the top of the article? Also, Wikipedia's MOS suggests that only one instance of a term needs to be linked. I am going through removing duplicate links. Please do not restore them. Thank you.

Twofingered Typist ( talk) 16:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi there, re: this, please don't use the 2 switch when using the Reflist template. What looks good on your browser doesn't necessarily look good on other users' browsers, and community consensus prefers that web browsers determine the number of columns based on screen size, not forcing them to only display 2. 30em is the standard default if columns are necessary. See Template:Reflist instructions. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Thank you for figuring this out. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply

I hate to be too formal these days, so i'll keep it straight. Hope you would throw some comments here. Pavanjandhyala 10:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi there, re: this, I'm curious where your summary that the film received critical acclaim comes from. I don't see it in the reference you provided, but maybe I'm missing something. Since I don't want to erroneously suggest that you pulled the summary out of whole cloth, I'm hoping you could please take a moment to edify me. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Kailash29792 was kind enough to resolve this matter for me here. E2050, I want you to know that I'm not going out of my way to raise issues with you, and I certainly have nothing against you. You work hard and your improvements are greatly appreciated. I do however think clear edit summaries as well as more attention to direct sourcing would be very helpful to editors such as myself who operate from the fringes of the very difficult subject area of Indian entertainment articles. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Yes I'm associated and hope that's not an issue. Purely inspired from you. Learning everyday, Thanks for your concern. Intention is not to promote but to make sure all the information is rightly available. Editor3050 ( talk)

That is the official title (as of now) of Vikram's upcoming 53rd film, courtesy this site. Feel free to create an article. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi, was asked to complete the plot of this article but I haven't seen the film. Perhaps you might be interested or could ask someone else, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 15:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Or is that the film's full title? I think it is Kaala Karikaalan, as the posters read. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Are you User:Official Google Editor? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 21:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC) reply

I have encountered possible copyright violation(s). Some or all of the content you added in a recent edit to Kaala (2018 film) in this edit appears to have been copy pasted from this source and has been removed.

Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites. If I have made an error, please accept my apologies.

For further information, please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask.

Anna Frodesiak, you have cited WP:MIRROR sources, and suspect him? -- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi Kailash29792. I'm just checking that right now. A lot of the sources are Youtube. That site is blocked where I am, so I am now asking at IRC to inspect the sources. Would you like to help? I could sure use the assistance. This is either a big problem, or a simple reverse copyvio issue. This editor is 6 years 1 month 15,254 edits. Copyvios would be a shock. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 06:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi again, Kailash29792. Thanks for the revert. I should have checked each ref. I used the Earwig tool and just reverted without checking. It is like 40 C here and my brain must have melted. Sorry Editor 2050. My apologies. Best wishes! I'm going out for icecream. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 07:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm GSS-1987. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Prithiveeraj, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

GSS ( talk| c| em) 16:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC) reply

For some reason related to WP:NFF, filmography tables must not include films that are not yet into production. That includes Paris Paris, which begins in October. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Sorry, presumed it was launched so that would be fine - a poster was also released. A temporary redirect to Ramesh Aravind or Queen may be an option, if we can't keep it. Editor 2050 ( talk) 21:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 14:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of S. Sashikanth at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 21:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.11% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for October: Women and disability Healthcare Geofocus: Nordic countries Continuing from month to month: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on Indian actresses or whatever during this month please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the Indian list in the sub page on Asia at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Alex Shih ^Talk 02:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Alex Shih ^Talk 02:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi E2050, re: this, sorry for the poor communication on my part. I didn't mean for you to infer that I thought you were connected, rather Chakdyn self-identified as CEO of the company. No slight against you was intended. My edit summary should have been more detailed. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Solo (2017 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from sawnet.org/video/y060niSXfspA. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Person who formerly started with "216" ( talk) 16:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Category:Tamil sequel films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Yunshui: SQL ^{Query me!} 21:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC) reply

For users with OTRS access, evidence is available at OTRS#2017111410009216. If you don't have OTRS access and would like to review this appeal, please email me and I'll give you the general gist. Yunshui  ^雲 _水 08:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC) reply

• @ Yunshui: - mailed you. Again, this is so unclear and a totally unwarranted, incorrect block. Editor 2050 ( talk) 13:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC) reply
• Editor 2050, we are still processing the evidence that led to your block, but in the meantime I have one question: what was your motivation for writing Arvind Vinod? Primefac ( talk) 15:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC) reply

More information has now been provided via OTRS. Having reviewed it, I'm no longer as confident in this block as I was originally - I know now who the actual user this client was communicating with was, and I do not see any reasonable evidence that this account is a sockpuppet of that (long-since blocked) user. As such, I think it's reasonable to offer the benefit of the doubt in this case, and I have unblocked your account. Yunshui  ^雲 _水 15:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC) reply

• • Thank you for processing my request and the apology via e-mail. I am happy that the right decision has been made - but obviously disappointed about the initial accusations without any evidence. (cc: @ Yunshui:, @ Winged Blades of Godric:, @ Cyphoidbomb:, @ Dr. Blofeld: )
  • @ Primefac: - Good question. This year, where available, I have tried to make the page " List of Tamil films of 2017" as complete as possible. So when a film has been released - I try and create a page for the necessary actors/technicians involved in the film project if they meet a certain criteria (ie. an actor who has appeared in at least three feature films, a technician who has worked on at least 7 films etc). If they meet this criteria, I have then tried to do the relevant research and create a page for the actor/technician in concern. Examples include pages such as Gopi Krishna (film editor) during the release of Enakku Vaaitha Adimaigal (2017) and Varun (actor) during the release of Bogan (2017), amongst others such as Delna Davis, Yuthan Balaji, Swathy Narayanan etc. Arvind Vinod was merely another one of the chain (I was slightly surprised as this was his first credit in about 7 years, but I proceeded to make the article anyway because it was his third lead role). Hope this helps. Editor 2050 ( talk) 00:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply
    • It does. This seems to be a case of seriously bad timing. I'm glad it could be sorted out. Primefac ( talk) 14:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hold your head high buddy and don't look back, ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply

That seems an entirely reasonable explanation, and further increases my confidence that I made the block in error (I wouldn't say it was "without evidence"; other OTRS agents have agreed with me that with the initial information there was more than enough evidence to warrant a block). For what it's worth, I apologise here as well; I'm sorry to have put you through that and - based on the explanation above and some further investigation last night - am now sure I was mistaken. Mea culpa. Yunshui  ^雲 _水 08:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Welcome back, 2050! Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Primefac:, @ Yunshui: - guys, I have mailed you regarding the follow-up. This is all obviously quite disturbing and turning into a Black Mirror-esque episode. :S Editor 2050 ( talk) 01:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Dr. Blofeld:, @ Cyphoidbomb: - thank you so much guys! Editor 2050 ( talk) 01:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Administrative note

For the record, the concern initially expressed in the OTRS ticket that Editor 2050 was an undisclosed paid editor has turned out to be false (for various reasons). While it is unfortunate that a block had to be issued before everything got sorted out, I am glad that we have reached an amicable resolution and retained a prolific content creator. Primefac ( talk) 13:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Dear Editor 2050! Can you make about short movie Shunyata (film) or Makhmal, starring Jackie Shroff, find plot and references? Thank you! -- 178.71.222.210 ( talk) 08:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello Editor 2050, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. Happy editing, Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Dear Editor 2050,

As you u knew or dont know that ... the new poster of Nimir released today for Jan 26, 2018 release along with the trailer today, where the reference of new poster showed well in the site linked as well the check today's newspaper Without confirming it removing the Nimir release shows the act differently from your side.

If you only want to update the List of Tamil films of 2018, let me know here, I am removing myself from Wikipedia updates of this page ... Cool... Thanks .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhanus2u ( talk • contribs) 16:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Would you like to be a member of this? We are determined to reach 1000 articles, and that includes recent creations, expansions, GAs, FAs and FLs. Every time you create a new article or expand one largely, we will list it there. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Sure, feel free to count all my created articles from the relevant start date to the list. Think there are about 230 articles since October 2016 + a few more major expansions. Editor 2050 ( talk) 23:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Thank you. Just sign your name here by typing ~~~~, and we will list your articles. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 03:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Can you list all the articles you created since October 2016? Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi. Please don't add unsourced birth dates, as you did at Arav. This requires a citation to a reliable source. In a biography of a living person, this is especially important. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, I believe we can create his page as he already played hero in two films and the third one had its principal photography. Rajeshbieee ( talk) 23:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Editor 2050 - let's wait. Thamizhan Endru Sol has been stuck for nearly two years. I am sure he will soon sign another film - but I fear this may open the floodlights. If Madura Veeran goes on to become very notable, I guess we can create. Editor 2050 ( talk) 23:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Rajeshbieee - He is bound to do more films irrespective of the fate of Thamizhan Endru Sol or Madura Veeran as he is having the support of his father, a notable actor of Tamil films. For example, we don't know the future of Rameez Raja, actor of Vidhi Madhi Ultaa or actors like Nandanram Narayana or Vasanth Ravi, but Shanmuga Pandian is already a notable actor of Tamil films. Rajeshbieee ( talk) 23:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Okay, I guess if you can source it well enough - and the deletion police don't come after you. Editor 2050 ( talk) 00:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Thank you man.. page created... expecting your contribution too. Rajeshbieee ( talk) 00:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Dear Editor 2050! I read it in some article about movie, which have untitled movie (Production No.1) will producing by banner PRK Productions, which in this movie Puneeth Rajkumar producing? Maybe have new title for this movie? If you maybe create article about his upcoming movie and in this movie have heroine and this movie with original screenplay or remake?? Thank u! -- 178.71.200.188 ( talk) 06:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Dear Editor 2050! I read some article about company PRK Production and PRK Music it's companies, which owned Kannada-language actor and singer Puneeth Rajkumar, but can you make an article about untitled movie, which directing Shashank and acting nd producing Puneeth Rajkumar? Thank u! -- 92.100.192.249 ( talk) 17:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks for the message. Sorry won't be able to do this. Have close to zero knowledge of Kannada cinema. All the best. Editor 2050 ( talk) 13:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Does it happen to be a song sequence similar to "Aga Naga" from Ko or "Deewangi" from Om Shanti Om? If yes, you could share me a video link if available, I could cite it as a source. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Kailash29792 - as a part of a "film launch event" - [21] + more directors around the 2:10:00 mark. Editor 2050 ( talk) 17:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Dear Editor2050! Can you make an article about recently released movie Okka Kshanam starring Allu Sirish, find please music and references about production? Thank you! -- 178.66.103.83 ( talk) 05:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hey dude. You can do it yourself - start an account, and use an existing template. I don't really create Telugu film articles, without reason. Editor 2050 ( talk) 13:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashwini Chandrashekar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashwini Chandrashekar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Chrissymad - Hi. Could you please explain the caption here. Editor 2050 ( talk) 17:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Chrissymad - Could you exercise your discretion and kindly halt your deletions until the above is solved? Vishnu Priyan clearly passes WP:NACTOR, as does Ashwini Chandrashekar. Even if you go through removing their names from articles, it does not mean that they did not star in those films. Editor 2050 ( talk) 19:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Editor 2050 I'll gladly withdraw my nomination provided you can prove he actually meets NACTOR. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Chrissymad

• Vishnu Priyan has had significant roles in thirteen films - lead roles in 8, and supporting roles in 5. That too across three different languages. [22], [23] and [24]. Also speaks at length about his career here in Tamil: [25]. A further write-up about his general career here: [26] and [27] Editor 2050 ( talk) 19:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Yeah, those are primarily passing mentions followed by an interview which aren't coverage. Bookmyshow is the equivalent of iMDb. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:28, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Chrissymad Still passes WP:NACTOR - "significant roles" and "multiple notable films" is enough - the sources on the page and above all show he was "significant". Several of those films had wide releases across South India. Not entirely sure how familiar you are with the Indian film industry to make a call on it, but those were pretty notable projects. Editor 2050 ( talk) 22:48, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

No, it's not. None of it is substantiated by RS and there is no coverage. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

26 February 2018

Primefac - what? why? Not again. Editor 2050 ( talk) 17:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Primefac - do explain and see our e-mail chain last time around. Again, so ridiculous. Editor 2050 ( talk) 17:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Because I can directly link you to a deleted page which was commissioned and paid for, and for which you did not disclose. Primefac ( talk) 17:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

: Primefac - You took the same tone last time and were proved wrong. You followed a ridiculous, anonymous claim + blocked me for three weeks, and were subsequently proved wrong. I accepted your apology via e-mail, I explained the method I choose on creating articles and we moved on. What is it now? Editor 2050 ( talk) 18:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

This time it's not circumstantial. We have an OTRS email from a customer where the company lists an article which you were the only editor on. You might be a prolific article creator, but if you take payment for even one article and do not disclose, you have violated the terms of use. Primefac ( talk) 18:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Primefac, the only deleted company article on my page is Abi & Abi Studios (created 26 November 2015) and even that is a redirect page to an article created by someone else. You will have to be more clear. Last time you fell for an anonymous troll post, and I ended up blocked for three weeks. Editor 2050 ( talk) 18:44, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Primefac Can you be sure the company letter is genuine or that they are claiming credit for articles they had nothing to do with. Also, are the other articles on the list likely or unlikely to be paid editing? Also is this otrs from the same person as the last one that led to a block and then unblock ? thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

To your first question, as much as I can be. To your second question, I don't know what "list" you're talking about; Chrissymad's nominations have nothing to do with this, and I'm not making any claims about any articles. Third question, no, this is a different person.

I'll be honest, I was surprised as anyone when I came across the ticket, but I just can't see any way that this isn't undisclosed paid editing. The only other option I can see is that a company that specializes in getting articles on Wikipedia just happened to see the page creation of a page right after someone emailed them to make the page, thereby stealing the credit (and money) of the subject. It's not impossible, but Occam's razor tells me to choose UPE. Primefac ( talk) 19:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Primefac I wasn't referring to chrissymad its just that not having access to the otrs ticket i assumed it was a list of paid articles but now I take it it was an invoice. Again can you be sure it is a genuine invoice from the company and not a fabrication? thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict) It's not an invoice, and no, there is zero reason to believe fabrication, because that would be silly. The person who emailed OTRS was complaining that their article had been deleted, and wanted us to do something about it (which of course we cannot do). Primefac ( talk) 20:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Primefac - you had "zero reason to believe fabrication" last time, too. You simply read a stray message and presumed it to be true. Then you found something stray online, and tried to convince me again. You were wrong all along - for all three weeks - and I faced the repercussions of a wrongful 3-week block. You faced nothing - no block, no demotion, no incorrect loss of dignity. The least you can do is be transparent. Editor 2050 ( talk) 20:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Primefac - again, I'm here to work with you, not against you. You got it wrong last time round - and I suffered as a result, while you carried on without a worry with your administrator duties. Could you kindly be a lot more specific (whether here or on e-mail)? Editor 2050 ( talk) 20:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict) At this exact point in time, no, because I would prefer to keep the confidentiality of the customer. Besides, there isn't much more you could say that you haven't already said (based on the replies from last time and this time). Primefac ( talk) 20:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Primefac - Re:"there isn't much more you could say that you haven't already said" - what is this? I had to bring all the evidence (ie. a bunch of Google search results / explanations of the Indian film industry) last time around, because you jumped to a conclusion after receiving a stray and suspicious e-mail. There is obviously a lot more I can say on this issue or any other. Editor 2050 ( talk) 20:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

27 February 2018

Atlantic306 - Thank you so much, by the way. Really appreciate your interest and edits on this matter - very grateful. Editor 2050 ( talk) 20:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: Just for anyone auditing this chat - please do help out if you can. Especially those familiar with Tamil films. So as per the above, there has been a complaint about a page being deleted - and someone has claimed that I was paid for one of those deleted pages. Funnily enough the same issue popped up in November 2017 - and I was able to quite easily clear my name, once people listened and told me what was really going on! I really do feel that if you're alien to Tamil cinema - you are unlikely to understand the finer details of the allegation. My only deleted creations are: actor Sai Dheena, actress Bhawana Aneja, actor Arvind Vinod, the film Ivan Yarendru Therikiratha, actor Hari Krishnan, and actor Nishanth. In November 2017, it was a proven scammer complaining about Arvind Vinod - so I doubt he's the case here (I will add a summary of that case later today, if I'm not cleared). Doubt it's the film either, so I guess the OTRS ticket relates to one of the other four artists - Sai Dheena, Bhawana Aneja, Hari Krishnan, Nishanth. Anyone familiar with Tamil films - will be able to understand that none of these four people/their associates are likely to get in touch via OTRS! Mainly because they are quite low-key / relatively rural-based. I feel there is a scammer / character assassin doing the rounds - like proven in November! Do state your views! :) Editor 2050 ( talk) 01:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Chrissymad query

I'll also add this since we're on the subject of TOU abuse: Editor 2050, could you explain why on an article you created, Editor2050 adds Praveen Antony, followed by Edit2060 uploading photos on commons of the subject and then lot of you, including Edit2020 are the primary editors on Praveen Antony? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:22, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Oh wow - just came to know of this. I have no links to Editor2050, Edit2020 or Edit2060 - I'm sure you can run a check. In the past some editors have openly admitted being influenced by my username like here [28]. Editor 2050 ( talk) 19:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Chrissymad Hi, how have you got access to the edit history of deleted articles as you are not an admin ? thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:44, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict) She asked me about it. As you may or may not know, Chrissymad is very active (and accurate) at SPI, and so generally when she asks something like "did user X edit page Y" I tend to oblige. Primefac ( talk) 20:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict) - not accurate here. Totally unrelated. I can only presume that a fan/associate of film editor Praveen Antony was inspired by my user name. Again check user, if you must. Editor 2050 ( talk) 20:44, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Unblock request

Oshwah - Hi. Have you read through this entire thread in regard to the blocking? Have you also consulted Yunshui about this? I would really appreciate more details on the case. In November 2017, the same thing happened - and it turned out to be a scammer, who'd taken the administrators for a ride for three weeks. Editor 2050 ( talk) 23:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• I have also reviewed the ticket, and endorse Primefac's block. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • TonyBallioni - I will try and provide a summary of the conversations that I had on e-mail with Primefac/Yunshui from November, tomorrow. Hopefully that will give a clearer picture. Editor 2050 ( talk) 01:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply
    • I'll ping Yunshui so they are aware of this, but as of now, the block looks on very solid grounds. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:06, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

November 2017 scam

Chain of events

• On 14 November 2017, I was blocked by User: Yunshui after he received information from someone stating that they had been financially cheated in regard to pages being created.
• On 27 November 2017, Yunshui unblocked me after he felt he discovered the real culprit.
• Also on 27 November 2017, User: Primefac enquired why I created the page “Arvind Vinod”. I responded with my reasoning above and he was glad that the issue was sorted out.

Further accusations

• On 28 November 2017, both Yunshui and Primefac e-mailed me and revealed that they had found this online – and thought I had cheated them and was in the wrong: <redacted>
• I was glad they sent this over – as previously, I went two weeks without knowing anything behind the reasons of my block. I had been kept in the dark, while having accusations thrown at me. Through pretty basic Google research, I was able to find that:

Proof of scam

(1) The profile of <redacted> casted a doubt.

• I am sure anyone with a basic knowledge of Indian cinema would have realised a scam purely with the inconsistency of the names involved.
• Firstly, he referred to the trio as "our artists" - but I seriously doubted there was any association or common factor between the three actors:
  • (a) Aaditi Pohankar is a North-Indian, Marathi-based theatre artist who has signed a very big film in Mannavan Vanthanadi directed by Selvaraghavan. She has little-to-no knowledge of Tamil and is very unlikely to be using the same "manager" as the other two smaller artistes.
  • (b) Delna Davis is an actress who has been shifting between Malayalam and Tamil films - and has worked on small-budget films. A totally different league from both Aaditi / Arvind - way below the former and way above the latter.
  • (c) Arvind Vinod has only 3 film credits - Balam (2009), Madurai to Theni (2011) and Soora Thengai (2017) - with the latter having a delayed release as per online sources. Neither of the films are notable - and knowing the Tamil film industry - it is pretty much impossible to say that someone like Arvind Vinod will have a manager - let alone someone who is apparently guiding Aaditi Pohankar as well.
• Secondly, the post was made on <redacted URL> 28 November 2017. Very conveniently after my name was cleared on my talk page. The person seems to have joined the site on the same day too. I have no idea how the administrators found the thread and posted it to me that quickly.
• Thirdly, by chance, googling <redacted> - it very much seemed that the person had conveniently taken a name of a North Indian casting director from Mumbai: <redacted URLs>. While the real <redacted> seems like a legitimate person, I significantly doubt he will be managing the careers of people like Delna Davis and Arvind Vinod - both of whom are not even in the reckoning in the Tamil film industry, let alone Bollywood.

(2) A quick google search on the supposed catfisher <redacted> <redacted>

(3) The timing of my edits did not correlate to the accusations:

• Looking at my history, it was very clear that the three articles were created in the space of three hours. Again the articles were created taking into account of my intention of making the " Tamil Films of 2017" page as complete as possible. Aaditi had just signed the big Mannavan Vanthanadi and Gemini Ganeshanum Suruli Raajanum, and had already appeared in 3 films prior to that. Delna Davis's Aakkam and Kurangu Bommai were in the news, which made me research her past and create an article. Likewise with Arvind Vinod - his 2017 film was his third lead role, so I created the page.
• I was obviously on a roll of creating articles - and looking at my history - I created articles for actors of a similar mould in the days leading up to the so-called "event".
  • On 22nd April, I created Swathy Narayanan (" Ilai") and Yuthan Balaji (" Nagarvalam").
  • On 23rd April, Satna Titus (" Yeidhavan").
  • On 24th April, Charles Vinoth (" Yeidhavan"), as well articles for supporting actors with several credits such as Thirumurugan and Daniel Annie Pope.
• I then took a WikiBreak from creating because I had commitments in real life. I then returned and continued making articles for little-known actors in late August and early September with articles like Swathi Deekshith and Vivek Prasanna.

(4) I also provided Primefac and Yunshui of my real location, my whereabouts and my phone code – all of which contradicted the report on the site.

Conclusion

• <redacted>
• I also advised the administrators to contact "<redacted>" for the "bank statement, conversation on seo, email conservation" as he claimed, if they really wanted - as all of those would prove the whole idea to be baseless or that someone has catfished "him" using my Wikipedia edits.
• Either this, or more eerily, a well-planned character assassination of me taken from my edits on Wikipedia. I am strongly beginning to suspect this is the case.
• On 29 November 2017, both Primefac and Yunshui accepted my explanation and duly offered an apology for their incorrect assumptions.

February 2018

• On 26 February 2018, Primefac blocked me again stating he received another suspicious message about a payment received for a deleted page. Till date, he is yet to provide any details of what happened.
• I feel this is a shame - especially considering that I had to do the job for them last time round, after they had been scammed via an anonymous message and fully believed the claim. I honestly feel the same thing is happening again. Of course, I have not accepted any payment for any article whatsoever - and have created over 1100 articles on Tamil cinema.
• Would like to hear your thoughts Primefac, Yunshui, TonyBallioni, Oshwah, Cyphoidbomb, Vensatry, Kailash29792, Srivin, Atlantic306, Ssven2, Rajeshbieee, Dr. Blofeld, Winged Blades of Godric, SQL.

  I told you before, and I'll re-emphasise: this case is entirely unrelated to the last. While it is unfortunate you were caught up previously, it has zero bearing on this existing block. I've also redacted a significant portion of your "reply" because you can't just slander someone post people's personal information like that. Primefac ( talk) 14:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

  • But, Primefac - your accusations here are slander too. Can you at least be clear + specific as to what happened. You were easily fooled last time round, and it's happened again. I am trying to help you here - you have made another mistake. Editor 2050 ( talk) 14:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Also, how are you even making these decisions? Do you just read something and believe it? Like how you believed the rogue complaint page last time? There is not a chance of any evidence - because nothing happened. Editor 2050 ( talk) 14:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

    Okay, so technically it would be libel not slander, and no, I have not said anything "libellous". I have intentionally and carefully worded my replies so that I avoid such a situation; I did not post the personal information of someone for all of Wikipedia to see. And you remember the second half of the phrase fool me once? I saw your name pop up and I made sure to eliminate all but the most probable options, because I didn't want to do this song and dance again. However, as I stated above, the OTRS ticket involved conversation between the client and what I'll call the "Wikipedia Editing Firm", wherein the WEF stated a now-deleted page where you were the sole contributor. The only other plausible option is the client asked WEF to create a page for them, and you just happened to have written it right after that, and then after the page was deleted the client asks WEF for the money back before sending the OTRS email; it's not entirely impossible, but the timing is so incredibly implausible that I have to go with Occam's razor here and say that you're not disclosing the fact that you have written articles for pay.

    You are of course welcome to make another unblock request, but keep in mind that two uninvolved administrators (i.e. they weren't involved the first go-round) have commented that the evidence for the block is compelling, so you will have to present some compelling evidence of your own to contradict that. I doubt a further rehashing of the November incident will do you any good, because that has already been resolved. If there is private information you are of course welcome to contact the functionaries or ArbCom (though the former is probably better). Primefac ( talk) 15:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Editor 2050, please do not resort to badmouthing. I know you could not have done something as cheap as COI, but speaking harshly to these admins may cost you your ability to request an unblock appeal. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Editor 2050. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Y NOT Studios.jpg — was tagged with {{ OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 14:37, 2 June 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Avargal (2017 film). Since you had some involvement with the Avargal (2017 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC) reply

The article Thamizhan Endru Sol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ( talk| c| em) 11:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Y NOT Studios.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The article Ravi Prakash (Telugu actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor - supporting roles only - does not meet WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse ( talk) 09:49, 23 October 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cinderella (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Cinderella (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Merlin (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Merlin (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Machan (unreleased film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machan (unreleased film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rangoon (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Rangoon (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 16:48, 1 December 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maniratnam's Untitled Project. Since you had some involvement with the Maniratnam's Untitled Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shyam Ganesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyam Ganesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS ( talk| c| em) 10:41, 20 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The article Vamsi Krishna has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 08:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Template:C. V. Kumar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman 10:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florent Pereira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florent Pereira (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DragoMynaa ( talk) 00:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC) reply

The article M. A. Nishad has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 09:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Y NOT Studios.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravi Raghavendra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi Raghavendra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DragoMynaa ( talk) 06:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ooha (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ooha (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DragoMynaa ( talk) 02:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kangarooo (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Kangarooo (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC 678 05:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Y NOT Studios.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Sai Dheena requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sai Dheena. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 20:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashmitha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashmitha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 23:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naina Sarwar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naina Sarwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 00:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rathan Mouli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rathan Mouli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 00:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T. S. Jay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. S. Jay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 00:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Sudharsan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Sudharsan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 00:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varadhi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varadhi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 21:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajaji (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajaji (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 04:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashwathy Warrier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashwathy Warrier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 04:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhinay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhinay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 05:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karthik Sabesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karthik Sabesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 05:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venkat Sundar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venkat Sundar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 05:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prakash Chandra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Chandra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 05:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramakrishnan (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramakrishnan (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 18:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jemin Jom Ayyaneth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jemin Jom Ayyaneth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 18:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abijith Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abijith Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 14:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vibha Natarajan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibha Natarajan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Velukutty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Velukutty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. S. Prem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. S. Prem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1000 – Oru Note Paranja Katha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1000 – Oru Note Paranja Katha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello Editor 2050,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sharan Sharma for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- The9Man ^{( Talk)} 09:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aashritha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aashritha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 02:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nivas Adithan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nivas Adithan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 23:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Bharathi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Bharathi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi ( talk) 00:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Azhagiya Asura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 ( talk) 17:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Oruvan (1999 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 ( talk) 14:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Donaldd23 ( talk) 09:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC) reply

The article Bhogi (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found to help it pass WP:NFILM or WP:NFF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 ( talk) 21:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC) reply

-- Jammumylove Talk to me or ^{CHECK MY RECENT WORK} 07:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC) reply

The article Naan Thaan Siva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable unreleased film, fails WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 04:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Ayngaran (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines. No indication of being released anytime soon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Ab207 ( talk) 17:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Adangathey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film, appears to fail WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Ab207 ( talk) 12:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Ab207 ( talk) 08:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Ab207 ( talk) 06:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Othaikku Othai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No evidence of completing filming or being released, nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ab207 ( talk) 09:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Ab207 ( talk) 18:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Yung Mung Sung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No release date and nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

The article Ranga (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No evidence of completing filming or being released, nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Ab207 ( talk) 08:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Guest House (1999 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources in Kalki or Indiaglitz. All passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Kailash29792 (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Ennul Aayiram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply

BOVINEBOY 2008 09:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC) reply

BOVINEBOY 2008 10:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC) reply

DareshMohan ( talk) 07:15, 15 September 2022 (UTC) reply

DareshMohan ( talk) 07:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Vanangamudi (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No update; has been in deadlock/limbo for quite some time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Sathyaraj Natarajan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 13:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC) reply

DareshMohan ( talk) 15:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Salim(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Salim(film) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 05:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Kailash29792 (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Kailash29792 (talk) 04:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply