The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination has been withdrawn, sources added to the article. LizRead!Talk! 23:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The film is obscure, undersourced and fails
WP:NFILM. In fact the producer's son
said, "even I don’t remember much of that film". Kailash29792(talk) 04:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or Redirect to
List_of_Tamil_films_of_1999#January_—_March. The page has three sources where two are unreliable, one is a blog and the other cinesouth.com is not a registered domain. Thehindu.com has no coverage, simply that R.K. Suresh's father, an ex-producer, made a Murali-starrer called Poo Vaasam. Fails
WP:N and
WP:NFILM.
RangersRus (
talk) 13:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Which seems enough for a redirect, given its notable cast, don't you think? -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. The film is praised in two sources that were published in 2021 and after giving notability to this 1999 film. At first glance, I thought that mentioning this film was a typo for Pudhu Vasantham but realised that the sources mentioned another flop film Pasakiligal so it is not likely an error. Cine Samugam and Cineulagam are not listed as unreliable at
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Not reliable and each of the sources has an author byline.
DareshMohan (
talk) 04:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting, nominator has withdrawn their nomination but there are still a variety of arguments over what should happen with this article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 04:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Changing !Vote to OK with Keep in view of sources added.-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination has been withdrawn, sources added to the article. LizRead!Talk! 23:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The film is obscure, undersourced and fails
WP:NFILM. In fact the producer's son
said, "even I don’t remember much of that film". Kailash29792(talk) 04:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or Redirect to
List_of_Tamil_films_of_1999#January_—_March. The page has three sources where two are unreliable, one is a blog and the other cinesouth.com is not a registered domain. Thehindu.com has no coverage, simply that R.K. Suresh's father, an ex-producer, made a Murali-starrer called Poo Vaasam. Fails
WP:N and
WP:NFILM.
RangersRus (
talk) 13:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Which seems enough for a redirect, given its notable cast, don't you think? -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. The film is praised in two sources that were published in 2021 and after giving notability to this 1999 film. At first glance, I thought that mentioning this film was a typo for Pudhu Vasantham but realised that the sources mentioned another flop film Pasakiligal so it is not likely an error. Cine Samugam and Cineulagam are not listed as unreliable at
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Not reliable and each of the sources has an author byline.
DareshMohan (
talk) 04:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting, nominator has withdrawn their nomination but there are still a variety of arguments over what should happen with this article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 04:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Changing !Vote to OK with Keep in view of sources added.-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.