 | Welcome! Please feel free to leave me feedback, questions, comments or constructive criticism.
|
I think the svg version still needs work. All of the white areas on the logo are enlarged. It misrepresents the gif (accurate) version of the logo. Pats1 T/ C 19:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
I would say the 18:08, 14 November 2009 is better. The letters need to be smaller than what they currently are.Pats1 T/ C 02:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)- Nevermind, it was a cache issue on my end that made a previous version appear. Your latest version is the best.
Pats1
T/
C 02:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think it matches the original .gif now. I think I had the same cache problem when I updated it once. I appreciate the input along the way. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 21:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind, it was a cache issue on my end that made a previous version appear. Your latest version is the best.
Pats1
T/
C 02:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
|
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
| For converting the University of Houston's athletic logo from a raster to vector one, and painstakingly updating it on all articles among other graphic contributions. Brian Reading ( talk) 20:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot! I appreciate it. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 21:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate you making these svg images, but please be careful about what tags you place on them. Every time you use a FUR template to show the source information, it is tagged as a fair use image. There are bots that go around taking these images out of articles without FURs. Since the two images I'm talking about weren't copyrightable (Syracuse and Houston), they could potentially be removed from hundreds of articles and user pages requiring a lot of effort to fix.
Once again, thanks for the improvements to the images! If you need any help on other images, let me know. — BQZip01 — talk 21:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- The PD-textlogo and Trademarked tags should only be used in lieu of copyright notices and FURs in the cases mentioned in their rationales, but basicly anything not eligible for copyright (text, simple geometric shapes, and a few others as well as uncopyrightable images (like PD images)).
— BQZip01 —
talk 23:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Either the images are copyrighted or they are not. They can't be both. Please make sure you are correctly tagging images. — BQZip01 — talk 01:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Here's the attempt at Everton's league progress. The fonts got messed up, so I'll have to look at that again. I thought you might be interested.
File:Everton_FC_League_Results.svg
Bryan Burgers ( talk) 23:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Just saw your post on "his" talkpage....it's definitely vandalism; I noticed it from the change of Toosey First Nation to Roland First Nation, and had a look at his user contributions and found many similar. This user should be blocked immediately, and all edits made by him/her reversed. Skookum1 ( talk) 17:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- That seems clear to me as well, just wanted to try to give a good faith warning. Also, I don't know how to revert a moved page and I don't know who to approach to request a block. Can you help with that?
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 17:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try and think of a suitable admin, I'm still coffeeing up; there is an administrator's noticeboard out there, which is a central clearinghouse for things like this, can't remember its exact Wiki address/title right now....
Skookum1 (
talk) 17:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- NB he/she has said they will stop.....but that they started in the first place is the point; not to be trusted as re promises about stopping; also note his/her post at the bottom of my talkpage (which I've added a suitable subject heading for, since he/she didn't bother).
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I reverted the moves. Thanks for the help. The ironic thing is that he/she started contributing by reverting vandalism.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 18:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Vandals do all kinds of strange things....I found
the administrator's noticeboard, q.v..
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help today, Skookum. I learned something new! Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 04:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Vandals do all kinds of strange things....I found
the administrator's noticeboard, q.v..
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I reverted the moves. Thanks for the help. The ironic thing is that he/she started contributing by reverting vandalism.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 18:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- NB he/she has said they will stop.....but that they started in the first place is the point; not to be trusted as re promises about stopping; also note his/her post at the bottom of my talkpage (which I've added a suitable subject heading for, since he/she didn't bother).
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try and think of a suitable admin, I'm still coffeeing up; there is an administrator's noticeboard out there, which is a central clearinghouse for things like this, can't remember its exact Wiki address/title right now....
Skookum1 (
talk) 17:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Nice job spotting that - The vandal has now been blocked and it looks like the vandal page moves have been fixed. Not that you did anything wrong or anything, but for future reference or whatever, Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, or WP:AIV for short, would be the place to go to report obvious vandalism like the kind you saw. The noticeboards work too, but you'll generally get a wonk yelling at you to go to AIV instead. AIV is also usually the faster way to get someone blocked, as searching out individual admins means hoping that they are online at the moment. Alexius Horatius 01:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- That was my first case viewing something like that. I wrote the warning to Hibe3000 and then tried to find what to do next. It was a learning experience and now I know where to go in a similar situation. Thanks to you and Skookum1. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 04:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Nice work. Cptnono ( talk) 09:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I thought the article was really good and I hope it becomes an FA.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 19:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Cptnono, btw, was editing it the right thing to do? I mean, because it is an FAC. I'm not familiar with the standard procedures. I found some things I could improve, so I did. I figured you'd change things that didn't help it anyway. For example, does the part about Kingdome I added to the Seahawks section go there? In general, should I have sent you message? or left comments on the nomination page as if I was a real editor/reviewer person?
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Of course. It received multiple support votes before the restart. It failed the FA due to the writing needing clean up. My original focus was reworking the copy and paste from a couple websites several months ago and then it turned into becoming thorough coverage. Admittedly, getting good sources was more of my focus than quality writing. Having someone with the patience to fix my mistake is awesome! Your work while it was under FA made it look that much better.
Cptnono (
talk) 09:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- It looked like it was in pretty good shape for "copy and paste from a couple of websites." I will try to find a little time to see if I can further improve it.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oops. That wasn't what I meant. Originally, some editors had simply taken the "about us" like page and a couple stories. Thanks again for the tweaks. It makes a huge difference.
Cptnono (
talk) 23:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Badass. Thanks for another round. Feel free to do even more if you see concerns.
Cptnono (
talk) 12:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks again for all of the copyediting. Feel free to support or oppose if you lean either way.
- In regards to an image of a copyright image (taking a picture of CD cover for example), I am positive I saw this discussed previously and it isn't OK. I don't recall where the guideline is but will try to find it. I know some about images so let me know if you need a hand with something in particular.
Cptnono (
talk) 02:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info on the images. I of course support the article. But is it conflict of interest to support it at FAC as I am now the tied-for-second-most editor of the article? (I'm thinking of spending this coming weekend just adding and erasing periods so I can pass you though...watch out!) Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 01:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Badass. Thanks for another round. Feel free to do even more if you see concerns.
Cptnono (
talk) 12:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oops. That wasn't what I meant. Originally, some editors had simply taken the "about us" like page and a couple stories. Thanks again for the tweaks. It makes a huge difference.
Cptnono (
talk) 23:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- It looked like it was in pretty good shape for "copy and paste from a couple of websites." I will try to find a little time to see if I can further improve it.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Of course. It received multiple support votes before the restart. It failed the FA due to the writing needing clean up. My original focus was reworking the copy and paste from a couple websites several months ago and then it turned into becoming thorough coverage. Admittedly, getting good sources was more of my focus than quality writing. Having someone with the patience to fix my mistake is awesome! Your work while it was under FA made it look that much better.
Cptnono (
talk) 09:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Cptnono, btw, was editing it the right thing to do? I mean, because it is an FAC. I'm not familiar with the standard procedures. I found some things I could improve, so I did. I figured you'd change things that didn't help it anyway. For example, does the part about Kingdome I added to the Seahawks section go there? In general, should I have sent you message? or left comments on the nomination page as if I was a real editor/reviewer person?
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
And I stumbled upon Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#Derivative works. From my experience it is easy enough to write a FUR for an album cover on its article and other things like that. I have also seen posters OKd in articles as critical commentary but then it starts getting a little touchy. Let me know if you have something in particular. Cptnono ( talk) 10:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Awesome! Thank you for sticking with it and the copy editing. There is no way it would have passed without you.
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
| For your exceptional work at Qwest Field. Cptnono ( talk) 00:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
- Great! Thanks a lot. It was fun to help out and see it make FA. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 02:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Bryan Burgers ( talk) 12:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Is everything other than the passive prose fixed? ceran thor 16:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Do you want all of the passive writing gone? I think it fits better in some instances.
ceran
thor 18:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that all the passive doesn't have to go. Sometimes the subject of the sentence isn't important. There were some bad spots earlier, especially in the lead. It's better now, but I'll give it another look later. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 05:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
|
For your good work on Luis Suárez! Spiderone 16:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC) |
- Sweet! Thank you very much. If I send you my address can I get a real bowl of them? Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 22:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| its my pleasure always to have help. we all know that vandalism will not stop but at least I am able to help in minimizing it. Cheers my friend. Sean ( Hit) 23:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Sean! Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 22:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
It's really appreciated--I hear spotchecking is hard work. Hopefully my first FAC nomination is almost done with. I've replied to your specific concerns here, if you'd like to check whether I handled them correctly. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 06:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. It looked like the article was stuck at FAC due to a lack of spotchecks, and I thought I could help out. It was an interesting read and cited well. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 17:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For your detailed spotcheck of Prosperity theology! Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC) |
...or for all that money I gave to the church. In either case, thank you, Mark! Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 04:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
So I saw the image you posted (link below) and spotted an error. Oregon now has 2 professional team now. The Portland Trailblazers and the Portland Timbers. The Timbers were added to the MLS in 2011 and are currently in their second season.
Thank you :D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Major_sports_by_state.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.142.228 ( talk) 20:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Based on that article, "major teams" are the "Big Four" of baseball, basketball, hockey and football. The map you linked is based on those. The Timbers (MLS) are one of the "Big 6" from that article and don't fit the "Big Four" classification. The "Big 6" map is included in the article too, and is also here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Big6_teams_by_state_province.svg. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 21:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey, it's pretty easy. You win 3-0/3-1 you get 3 points the others 0. A 3-2 gives the winner 2 and the loser 1 point. The tiebreaker is points and then setsratio, pointsratio if i'm right. Any more question, feel free to ask. Beachvolleyball is just 2 points for a win and 1 for a loss. ;) Kante4 ( talk) 16:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. That makes sense. Thanks. Do you have a ref for that? I can add it if you want.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 17:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The fivb.org site i guess. That's the way it goes since 2-3 year i think. About the tiebreaker the same. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 18:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 19:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I found refs for both indoor and beach volleyball and added them in both competitions. Thanks for clarifying for me. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 19:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 19:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The fivb.org site i guess. That's the way it goes since 2-3 year i think. About the tiebreaker the same. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 18:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
It looks like the DYK template didn't quite take. I think this may be because you didn't close the wikilink on the comment line, and this prevented the template substitution from taking place. Perhaps if you were to edit the template again, adding the closing "]]" to that wikilink for the article which this one comes from, the edit will work properly. Be sure to Preview to make sure it works before saving it. Thanks! BlueMoonset ( talk) 01:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you! I've been staring at that trying to figure out what I did wrong. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 01:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- I noticed it wasn't right, but I thought the DYK would magically convert the weird format that I saw. I just figured it was something with the "subst:" thing at the beginning of the template that I didn't understand.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 01:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- It took me a few minutes to figure it out: the template looked okay to me at first glance, but Preview said not. When I finally noticed the missing brackets, I did a Preview to see if that did the trick, and discovered that the template thought that I was the nominee. Needless to say, I didn't save it: this was your nomination, and you deserved the credit. Hope the rest of the nomination process goes more smoothly. Thanks for the barnstar. :-)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- I was wondering why you didn't just do it yourself. Thanks for leaving me the official nomination. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 02:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- It took me a few minutes to figure it out: the template looked okay to me at first glance, but Preview said not. When I finally noticed the missing brackets, I did a Preview to see if that did the trick, and discovered that the template thought that I was the nominee. Needless to say, I didn't save it: this was your nomination, and you deserved the credit. Hope the rest of the nomination process goes more smoothly. Thanks for the barnstar. :-)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Uruguay v Ghana (2010 FIFA World Cup) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uruguay v Ghana (2010 FIFA World Cup) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uruguay v Ghana (2010 FIFA World Cup) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Pee Jay 10:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi
If an article has been written in English English rather than American English then the English spelling should prevail. In the UK we generally spell signalling with two lls.
thanks WeigelaPen ( talk) 12:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- I assume you're referring to a signaling pathway. Due to WP:CONSISTENCY, I chose one "l" because Wikipedia:WikiProject Cell Signaling also has only one "l". I don't think signaling pathway articles have strong national ties so that wouldn't suggest British or American English. One "l" is also the way I see it more in the literature (compare [1] with [2]). But I wouldn't say I'm the authority on it. Maybe you could bring it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cell Signaling. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 13:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Recently, Mississippi State updated their athletics logo (see here for the new image). Could you please update the SVG image? I can't do it and would rather not create a new file that is only PNG. If you could, that'd be great! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 21:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- I updated the file. I used Inkscape (free) and followed
this guide, with some post-processing modifications, if you ever want to give it a try.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 20:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- I might give it a try someday. Thanks for updating the file! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 20:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Calvin Knights logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mississippi State Bulldogs.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 02:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Lugol's iodine page, your edit caused a URL error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Strafpeloton2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Strafpeloton2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
On 5 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the pinkish-red portion of the Flag of Sioux Falls (pictured) represents the Sioux Quartzite stone which was quarried nearby and used to build early Sioux Falls buildings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Theodor Langhorne Franklin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Giants 1976.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Willy1018 (
talk) 06:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ed! --
Ed! (
talk) 18:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota
The article
Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ed! --
Ed! (
talk) 18:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Providence Friars logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota
The article
Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ed! --
Ed! (
talk) 23:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploading File:BuckyBadger.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploading File:DordtCollege.logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
| Welcome! Please feel free to leave me feedback, questions, comments or constructive criticism.
|
I think the svg version still needs work. All of the white areas on the logo are enlarged. It misrepresents the gif (accurate) version of the logo. Pats1 T/ C 19:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
I would say the 18:08, 14 November 2009 is better. The letters need to be smaller than what they currently are.Pats1 T/ C 02:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)- Nevermind, it was a cache issue on my end that made a previous version appear. Your latest version is the best.
Pats1
T/
C 02:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think it matches the original .gif now. I think I had the same cache problem when I updated it once. I appreciate the input along the way. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 21:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind, it was a cache issue on my end that made a previous version appear. Your latest version is the best.
Pats1
T/
C 02:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
|
|
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
| For converting the University of Houston's athletic logo from a raster to vector one, and painstakingly updating it on all articles among other graphic contributions. Brian Reading ( talk) 20:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot! I appreciate it. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 21:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate you making these svg images, but please be careful about what tags you place on them. Every time you use a FUR template to show the source information, it is tagged as a fair use image. There are bots that go around taking these images out of articles without FURs. Since the two images I'm talking about weren't copyrightable (Syracuse and Houston), they could potentially be removed from hundreds of articles and user pages requiring a lot of effort to fix.
Once again, thanks for the improvements to the images! If you need any help on other images, let me know. — BQZip01 — talk 21:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- The PD-textlogo and Trademarked tags should only be used in lieu of copyright notices and FURs in the cases mentioned in their rationales, but basicly anything not eligible for copyright (text, simple geometric shapes, and a few others as well as uncopyrightable images (like PD images)).
— BQZip01 —
talk 23:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Either the images are copyrighted or they are not. They can't be both. Please make sure you are correctly tagging images. — BQZip01 — talk 01:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Here's the attempt at Everton's league progress. The fonts got messed up, so I'll have to look at that again. I thought you might be interested.
File:Everton_FC_League_Results.svg
Bryan Burgers ( talk) 23:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Just saw your post on "his" talkpage....it's definitely vandalism; I noticed it from the change of Toosey First Nation to Roland First Nation, and had a look at his user contributions and found many similar. This user should be blocked immediately, and all edits made by him/her reversed. Skookum1 ( talk) 17:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- That seems clear to me as well, just wanted to try to give a good faith warning. Also, I don't know how to revert a moved page and I don't know who to approach to request a block. Can you help with that?
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 17:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try and think of a suitable admin, I'm still coffeeing up; there is an administrator's noticeboard out there, which is a central clearinghouse for things like this, can't remember its exact Wiki address/title right now....
Skookum1 (
talk) 17:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- NB he/she has said they will stop.....but that they started in the first place is the point; not to be trusted as re promises about stopping; also note his/her post at the bottom of my talkpage (which I've added a suitable subject heading for, since he/she didn't bother).
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I reverted the moves. Thanks for the help. The ironic thing is that he/she started contributing by reverting vandalism.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 18:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Vandals do all kinds of strange things....I found
the administrator's noticeboard, q.v..
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help today, Skookum. I learned something new! Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 04:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Vandals do all kinds of strange things....I found
the administrator's noticeboard, q.v..
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I reverted the moves. Thanks for the help. The ironic thing is that he/she started contributing by reverting vandalism.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 18:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- NB he/she has said they will stop.....but that they started in the first place is the point; not to be trusted as re promises about stopping; also note his/her post at the bottom of my talkpage (which I've added a suitable subject heading for, since he/she didn't bother).
Skookum1 (
talk) 18:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try and think of a suitable admin, I'm still coffeeing up; there is an administrator's noticeboard out there, which is a central clearinghouse for things like this, can't remember its exact Wiki address/title right now....
Skookum1 (
talk) 17:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Nice job spotting that - The vandal has now been blocked and it looks like the vandal page moves have been fixed. Not that you did anything wrong or anything, but for future reference or whatever, Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, or WP:AIV for short, would be the place to go to report obvious vandalism like the kind you saw. The noticeboards work too, but you'll generally get a wonk yelling at you to go to AIV instead. AIV is also usually the faster way to get someone blocked, as searching out individual admins means hoping that they are online at the moment. Alexius Horatius 01:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- That was my first case viewing something like that. I wrote the warning to Hibe3000 and then tried to find what to do next. It was a learning experience and now I know where to go in a similar situation. Thanks to you and Skookum1. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 04:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Nice work. Cptnono ( talk) 09:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I thought the article was really good and I hope it becomes an FA.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 19:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Cptnono, btw, was editing it the right thing to do? I mean, because it is an FAC. I'm not familiar with the standard procedures. I found some things I could improve, so I did. I figured you'd change things that didn't help it anyway. For example, does the part about Kingdome I added to the Seahawks section go there? In general, should I have sent you message? or left comments on the nomination page as if I was a real editor/reviewer person?
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Of course. It received multiple support votes before the restart. It failed the FA due to the writing needing clean up. My original focus was reworking the copy and paste from a couple websites several months ago and then it turned into becoming thorough coverage. Admittedly, getting good sources was more of my focus than quality writing. Having someone with the patience to fix my mistake is awesome! Your work while it was under FA made it look that much better.
Cptnono (
talk) 09:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- It looked like it was in pretty good shape for "copy and paste from a couple of websites." I will try to find a little time to see if I can further improve it.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oops. That wasn't what I meant. Originally, some editors had simply taken the "about us" like page and a couple stories. Thanks again for the tweaks. It makes a huge difference.
Cptnono (
talk) 23:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Badass. Thanks for another round. Feel free to do even more if you see concerns.
Cptnono (
talk) 12:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks again for all of the copyediting. Feel free to support or oppose if you lean either way.
- In regards to an image of a copyright image (taking a picture of CD cover for example), I am positive I saw this discussed previously and it isn't OK. I don't recall where the guideline is but will try to find it. I know some about images so let me know if you need a hand with something in particular.
Cptnono (
talk) 02:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info on the images. I of course support the article. But is it conflict of interest to support it at FAC as I am now the tied-for-second-most editor of the article? (I'm thinking of spending this coming weekend just adding and erasing periods so I can pass you though...watch out!) Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 01:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Badass. Thanks for another round. Feel free to do even more if you see concerns.
Cptnono (
talk) 12:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oops. That wasn't what I meant. Originally, some editors had simply taken the "about us" like page and a couple stories. Thanks again for the tweaks. It makes a huge difference.
Cptnono (
talk) 23:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- It looked like it was in pretty good shape for "copy and paste from a couple of websites." I will try to find a little time to see if I can further improve it.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Of course. It received multiple support votes before the restart. It failed the FA due to the writing needing clean up. My original focus was reworking the copy and paste from a couple websites several months ago and then it turned into becoming thorough coverage. Admittedly, getting good sources was more of my focus than quality writing. Having someone with the patience to fix my mistake is awesome! Your work while it was under FA made it look that much better.
Cptnono (
talk) 09:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Cptnono, btw, was editing it the right thing to do? I mean, because it is an FAC. I'm not familiar with the standard procedures. I found some things I could improve, so I did. I figured you'd change things that didn't help it anyway. For example, does the part about Kingdome I added to the Seahawks section go there? In general, should I have sent you message? or left comments on the nomination page as if I was a real editor/reviewer person?
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 21:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
And I stumbled upon Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#Derivative works. From my experience it is easy enough to write a FUR for an album cover on its article and other things like that. I have also seen posters OKd in articles as critical commentary but then it starts getting a little touchy. Let me know if you have something in particular. Cptnono ( talk) 10:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Awesome! Thank you for sticking with it and the copy editing. There is no way it would have passed without you.
|
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
| For your exceptional work at Qwest Field. Cptnono ( talk) 00:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
- Great! Thanks a lot. It was fun to help out and see it make FA. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 02:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Bryan Burgers ( talk) 12:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Is everything other than the passive prose fixed? ceran thor 16:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Do you want all of the passive writing gone? I think it fits better in some instances.
ceran
thor 18:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that all the passive doesn't have to go. Sometimes the subject of the sentence isn't important. There were some bad spots earlier, especially in the lead. It's better now, but I'll give it another look later. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 05:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
|
|
For your good work on Luis Suárez! Spiderone 16:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC) |
- Sweet! Thank you very much. If I send you my address can I get a real bowl of them? Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 22:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
|
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| its my pleasure always to have help. we all know that vandalism will not stop but at least I am able to help in minimizing it. Cheers my friend. Sean ( Hit) 23:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Sean! Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 22:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
It's really appreciated--I hear spotchecking is hard work. Hopefully my first FAC nomination is almost done with. I've replied to your specific concerns here, if you'd like to check whether I handled them correctly. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 06:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. It looked like the article was stuck at FAC due to a lack of spotchecks, and I thought I could help out. It was an interesting read and cited well. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 17:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
|
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For your detailed spotcheck of Prosperity theology! Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC) |
...or for all that money I gave to the church. In either case, thank you, Mark! Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 04:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
So I saw the image you posted (link below) and spotted an error. Oregon now has 2 professional team now. The Portland Trailblazers and the Portland Timbers. The Timbers were added to the MLS in 2011 and are currently in their second season.
Thank you :D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Major_sports_by_state.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.142.228 ( talk) 20:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Based on that article, "major teams" are the "Big Four" of baseball, basketball, hockey and football. The map you linked is based on those. The Timbers (MLS) are one of the "Big 6" from that article and don't fit the "Big Four" classification. The "Big 6" map is included in the article too, and is also here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Big6_teams_by_state_province.svg. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 21:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey, it's pretty easy. You win 3-0/3-1 you get 3 points the others 0. A 3-2 gives the winner 2 and the loser 1 point. The tiebreaker is points and then setsratio, pointsratio if i'm right. Any more question, feel free to ask. Beachvolleyball is just 2 points for a win and 1 for a loss. ;) Kante4 ( talk) 16:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. That makes sense. Thanks. Do you have a ref for that? I can add it if you want.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 17:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The fivb.org site i guess. That's the way it goes since 2-3 year i think. About the tiebreaker the same. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 18:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 19:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I found refs for both indoor and beach volleyball and added them in both competitions. Thanks for clarifying for me. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 19:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 19:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The fivb.org site i guess. That's the way it goes since 2-3 year i think. About the tiebreaker the same. ;)
Kante4 (
talk) 18:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
It looks like the DYK template didn't quite take. I think this may be because you didn't close the wikilink on the comment line, and this prevented the template substitution from taking place. Perhaps if you were to edit the template again, adding the closing "]]" to that wikilink for the article which this one comes from, the edit will work properly. Be sure to Preview to make sure it works before saving it. Thanks! BlueMoonset ( talk) 01:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you! I've been staring at that trying to figure out what I did wrong. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 01:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- I noticed it wasn't right, but I thought the DYK would magically convert the weird format that I saw. I just figured it was something with the "subst:" thing at the beginning of the template that I didn't understand.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 01:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- It took me a few minutes to figure it out: the template looked okay to me at first glance, but Preview said not. When I finally noticed the missing brackets, I did a Preview to see if that did the trick, and discovered that the template thought that I was the nominee. Needless to say, I didn't save it: this was your nomination, and you deserved the credit. Hope the rest of the nomination process goes more smoothly. Thanks for the barnstar. :-)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- I was wondering why you didn't just do it yourself. Thanks for leaving me the official nomination. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 02:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- It took me a few minutes to figure it out: the template looked okay to me at first glance, but Preview said not. When I finally noticed the missing brackets, I did a Preview to see if that did the trick, and discovered that the template thought that I was the nominee. Needless to say, I didn't save it: this was your nomination, and you deserved the credit. Hope the rest of the nomination process goes more smoothly. Thanks for the barnstar. :-)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Uruguay v Ghana (2010 FIFA World Cup) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uruguay v Ghana (2010 FIFA World Cup) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uruguay v Ghana (2010 FIFA World Cup) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Pee Jay 10:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi
If an article has been written in English English rather than American English then the English spelling should prevail. In the UK we generally spell signalling with two lls.
thanks WeigelaPen ( talk) 12:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- I assume you're referring to a signaling pathway. Due to WP:CONSISTENCY, I chose one "l" because Wikipedia:WikiProject Cell Signaling also has only one "l". I don't think signaling pathway articles have strong national ties so that wouldn't suggest British or American English. One "l" is also the way I see it more in the literature (compare [1] with [2]). But I wouldn't say I'm the authority on it. Maybe you could bring it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cell Signaling. Strafpeloton2 ( talk) 13:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Recently, Mississippi State updated their athletics logo (see here for the new image). Could you please update the SVG image? I can't do it and would rather not create a new file that is only PNG. If you could, that'd be great! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 21:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- I updated the file. I used Inkscape (free) and followed
this guide, with some post-processing modifications, if you ever want to give it a try.
Strafpeloton2 (
talk) 20:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- I might give it a try someday. Thanks for updating the file! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 20:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Calvin Knights logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mississippi State Bulldogs.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 02:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Lugol's iodine page, your edit caused a URL error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Strafpeloton2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Strafpeloton2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
On 5 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the pinkish-red portion of the Flag of Sioux Falls (pictured) represents the Sioux Quartzite stone which was quarried nearby and used to build early Sioux Falls buildings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Theodor Langhorne Franklin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Giants 1976.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Willy1018 (
talk) 06:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ed! --
Ed! (
talk) 18:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota
The article
Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ed! --
Ed! (
talk) 18:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Providence Friars logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota
The article
Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ed! --
Ed! (
talk) 23:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploading File:BuckyBadger.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploading File:DordtCollege.logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)