This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
We are always looking for more help with the dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push in which we are making sure Wikipedia has an article on every cutaneous condition. With that being said, I wanted to know if you would be willing to help with the Bolognia push? I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for new articles and redirects. --- My Core Competency is Competency ( talk) 23:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the new ref. I moved it up higher in the section. BTW, do you have any thoughts to add to the discussion at The Count of Luxembourg? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 05:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Haymaker ( talk) 11:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I somewhat knew this was coming, but there are things you should know. There was a wave of islamic propaganda hitting wikipedia, due to the work of a single editor called Jagged85. His blatant misuse of sources and even straightforward lies were detected some time ago. It was an embarrasment for wikipedia and it even appeared of certain newspapers and blogs all over the internet. http://ocham.blogspot.com/2010/06/avicennian-logic.html; http://ahp.apps01.yorku.ca/?p=299; http://www.spectator.co.uk/essays/all/5482023/did-al-farabi-really-invent-sociology.thtml; and here´s the evidence. I don´t have any personal problem with muslims.I have problems with propaganda and false claims, no matter where it comes from.-- Knight1993 ( talk) 22:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
On 18 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Action of December 1669, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that engraver Wenceslaus Hollar was an eyewitness to the action of December 1669 off Cadiz, where HMS Mary Rose, under the command of Rear-Admiral John Kempthorne, fought off seven Algerine men-of-war? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Everything is clear in this sentence: "найбільшою жіночою організацією у Європі" or "bigest womans organization in Europe" - http://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/2010/12/29/11244/ ... Anyway, I have written: "one of the bigest" ... Best regards! -- SeikoEn ( talk) 07:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Don't leave spurious warnings for other editors, as you did here. [1] When leaving a warning, be sure to cite diff(s) so that people know what specifically you are talking about. When you leave a warning for an experienced editor, it is best to type out a custom message, rather than the warning templates. See WP:DTTR, which is not policy, but is still good advice. Finally, if a good faith editor is actively working on an article, try asking them about their intentions before jumping them with warnings a few minutes after their edits. They may still be assembling materials and getting ready to add the references you feel are missing. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 05:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I think you may have violated 3RR at The Reader. Would you consider reverting yourself, please? SlimVirgin talk| contribs 06:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
As your first edit today was another revert, I've filed a report on the 3RR board. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 22:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Roscelese reported by User:SlimVirgin (Result: 24h). EdJohnston ( talk) 01:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Roscelese ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I stopped edit warring before the report was made. I was warned for 3RR on the removal of original research - I reverted myself and stopped removing the original research. I was warned on the addition of an OR tag - I stopped adding the OR tag (wasn't able to remove it myself because someone else swooped in and did so before I could). Now that I know that 3RR applies to any edit whether or not it's of the same material, I've stopped violating the rule.* At this point a block is only punitive, not preventative.
Given the large amount of original research still present in the article in question, I request that I be unblocked so that I can continue the task I've already begun, which is to actually find citations for all this stuff. SV has said she's leaving the article, and none of the other editors involved appear to have any interest in doing anything about the original research given that it's been present in the article for months without anyone doing anything about it, so I'd like to continue referencing and improving the article. It seems inadvisable to block the only editor who's trying to find references.
I also ask that the reviewing admin read over the noticeboard report and take note of what parts of the report are in fact a content dispute. I have content issues too, but I didn't take them to Noticeboard. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Mere 24hr block has expired. Note: I would have declined the above request based on WP:NOTTHEM, WP:EW, and the fact that Wikipedia does not have any strict timeframes for improving articles ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry to see you got blocked. I wish you well. A few days ago, you checked in at the AfD debate for Barack Obama speech at Tucson memorial, and commented that you would take another look in a few days. I just wanted to let you know, as an interested editor, that I've tried hard to improve the article. Your observations would be appreciated. All the best. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Brazilian people love U.S. citizens. Many flights from TX, CA, FL, NY, and GE to Brazil exists. You are very welcome. In FEBRUARY, in the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil will be aproved the *SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN BRAZIL* ( [2]), and the pages LGBT rights in Brazil and Recognition of same-sex unions in Brazil need of you. Because will generate a heavy traffic on these pages, and we need you to help in the English spelling of these pages, you understand me? Please help me. Hentzer ( talk) 23:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese,
A few days ago, you added a statement:
I found a National Cancer Institute statement about abortion and breast cancer.(<ref> "Abortion, Miscarriage, and Breast Cancer Risk". National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 2011-01-11.</ref>)
So far, I haven't found a statement from the American Medical Association. Do you know of any?
-- Kevinkor2 ( talk) 13:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
What criteria are you using for notability on the Governor Thomas Johnson High School article? Paul, in Saudi ( talk) 04:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your excellent contributions in various choice related articles through wikipedia. WikiManOne ( talk) 05:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page. Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page. Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Hi Roscelese! Thanks for your comment. To make it easier for somewhat uninvolved bystanders, I suggest you provide a complete argument (i.e. explicitly list the source that supports your position). That will make it easier for third parties to join in. Also, if you cannot come to an agreement, WP:3O would be an option. -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 12:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
FYI - Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Roscelese reported by User:Haymaker .28Result: .29 - Haymaker ( talk) 12:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi thanks for the template - well, not really, a proper comment would have been better. - as you complained I will ask you here - you say on your talkpage "Inclusion on this list does not necessarily mean that a group or its members have committed illegal activity. " - could you please explain what allegations of illegal activity you are accusing these groups of? Also I suggest you take more care with your accusations of vandalism and you read the detailed explanation - WP:VANDALISM - any good faith edit attempting to benefit the project can not be described as vandalism. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi - you have removed a no index template from an uncited sub page you have created - please dont remove the template again as there is no excuse to allow your uncited article to be published in this way through a wikipedia user page. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
In this edit here, you remove the noindox from the uncited user creation - please do not do that again before you at least add citations to support your contentious claims. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
pLEASE STOP ADDINDG UNCITED CATS TO YOUR USERSPAGES - THSMNLS?? Off2riorob ( talk) 21:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
I have given you enuf good faith requests, if you remove the noindex again or you add cats that are attacking and uncited to your userspace I will report you. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Without commenting on anything else here, I just removed the categories from that draft, per Wikipedia:User pages#Categories, templates, and redirects. Adding a colon (:) before the word Category leaves the link visible but does not categorize the page, making it simple to add the page to the desired categories once the draft goes live. Regards, - 2/0 ( cont.) 00:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
User:Roscelese/List of designated hate groups -
Is there special some reason why you are edit warring to keep your uncited article in the search engine results ? Off2riorob ( talk) 02:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:User pages says in the lede - Wikipedia policies concerning the content of pages can and generally do apply to user pages, and users must observe these policies. Please either cite it or remove it from the search engines , imo you should {{NOINDEX}} until it is accepted into project pace, it is presently uncited and attacking organizations and groups. Off2riorob ( talk) 03:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese... I wanted to let you know that I have nominated the article on David Kato to be considered for an appearance on the main page in the Did You Know ...? section. The nomination can be seen at Template talk:Did you know#David Kato. You are most welcome to participate in the discussion of the nomination, should you wish. If the nomination is successful, you will be recognised as one of the authors who contributed significantly to the article. Regards, EdChem ( talk) 06:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Hello. You have
a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Thanks for the help clearing up the Ensoulment#Catholic Church article. I hope my restoring Clowes' citations is okay. Let me know. Thanks— Geremia ( talk) 21:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
(This section contains humor and can be ignored or deleted at a whim.) <humor> Hi Roscelese,
I saw a recent change you made and that reminded me of a funny philosophical question:
</humor>
-- Kevinkor2 ( talk) 12:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
The template {{ noindex}} should not be removed without consensus. See Wikipedia:UP#CMT. - Rrius ( talk) 04:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Please see Burlesque (genre), which has just been brushed up and now makes pretty good sense and is pretty well referenced. Then see the discussion at Talk:Burlesque - going forward and feel free to contribute your thoughts. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at User talk:WikiManOne's talk page.
Hello. You have a new message at User talk:WikiManOne's talk page.
The person you deleted is quite notable as in "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded." Eleven combat tours in Afghanistan and Iraq (there has got to be some sort of record for such things). Mortar platoon sergeant in a ranger battalion for donkey's years. High school athlete, became ordained so he could precide at his soldier's weddings. Quite notable indeed. Perhaps you could talk on the Governor Thomas Johnson High School talk page before you delete things. As for myself, I never met the kid. Paul, in Saudi ( talk) 05:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
I happened to notice this on user:haymaker's talk page and found it condescending and unnecessary. If you have a dispute with haymaker you should report it. Please refrain from WP:UNCIVIL behavior. Consider this a warning. Lionel ( talk) 09:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Haymaker ( talk) 16:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
hi - i'd like to know what it is that could have made it a better edit - hope you're not sore about un-"censoring" my other edits. sorry, i'm a newbie. the iud is a real issue in my country - the Philippines. our constitution protects both the mother and the unborn from the moment of conception (which is fertilization - complete DNA stage). versions of the RH bill enumerate different bc methods, including the iud (which is why the image is there). but i've been trawling through soooooo many blogs of women who've conceived while on the iud. some have carried to full term, while many have miscarried - the pain and suffering it's caused is palpable, but that's beside the point. anyway, it's my country, and our laws, and those are the facts. iuds in the philippines are legal, medically safe, and readily available - but they risk the viability of a fertilized egg. please help me make a good edit because it's information Filipina women should know. Batbear ( talk) 08:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
The edit war there seems to have died down for now. I'm trying to improve the article so we actually focus on what Planned Parenthood does every day rather than the controversies and lawsuits they have been involved in. I certainly welcome your collaboration there, its a big project, but I think PP has enough information available to at least take it to Good Article if not Featured. Wiki Man One 08:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
On 8 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Kato, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after Rolling Stone published photos and addresses of 100 gays and lesbians under the headline "Hang Them", Ugandan gay rights activist David Kato was awarded USh1.5 million in damages? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Noticed your post on User:WikiManOne's talk page (good advice, by the way) and as I normally do when I see a user I haven't seen before, I checked out your userpage (I like learning about people).
With that, I saw you translate articles in French and Italian. I would recommed joining those language Wikipedias. Go to My Preferences at the top and then click "Manage Your Global Account". From there, you can make it so when you go to any of the Wikipedias or Meta, Commons or the like, you will be instantly signed up and joined with your accounts linked together. It is what is called an SUL account. No idea what "SUL" means, but it is linked together. Go here and you will see what I mean by "linked accounts" (site is slow to load).
Also, I would recommend you join (if you haven't already) WP:LGBT. This is the LGBT WikiProject and they are always in need of help and with your translating skills, you could be of great use to them setting up similar projects on the other Wikis.
As always, please feel free to contact me with questions, comments, cookies :) and such. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
When you have a chance can you copy edit that? There's probably a bunch of little errors in there, but I can never seem to catch my own mistakes until like a week later. :) W M O 19:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Hey,
I'm working on an article for the Margaret Sanger Awards as one of my final projects on here. Its currently in my sandbox so if you want to help fill it in at all, I certainly won't mind. Also, there seems to be a good number of early seemingly notable public figures related to contraceptive access that don't have articles on wikipedia (currently two that I've found that received Sanger awards), would you be interested in helping write some of these once the awards article is done?
Also, I went ahead and took out the sentence you pointed out from the PP History section, I made some other changes to the article so if you want to look over it agian/copy edit it, give input on it on the talk page, etc., that would be great. W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 01:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I'd be interesting in helping. Do you have a plan of campaign so that we don't overlap. It's the sort of thing that I like doing when I get stuck. Best. -- Guillaume Tell 18:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I think we were both wrong about the recent removal of content by the IP user on this page. That material was a large quote from a primary source which is not especially notable and gives undue weight to a specific attack of this person, in violation of our BLP policies. So, their change was correct even though they are probably not sufficiently familiar with Wikipedia policies in order to follow the proper procedure. Marokwitz ( talk) 08:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
For good work with current events articles and keeping them neutral. Kansan ( talk) 21:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
On 15 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aslie Pitter, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Aslie Pitter, founder of Stonewall F.C., Britain's first and most successful gay football club, was made a Member of the Order of the British Empire for his work fighting homophobia in London? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
You've just posted a highly inappropriate template on my Talk page. In suggest you self-revert. It clearly isn't applicable in this situation since the displayed beliefs of the 'closer' are highly relevant to this issue. DeCausa ( talk) 01:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese, just letting you know that I went ahead and filed a WP:ANI report on User:WikiManOne here. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 02:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Not sure whether her article is on your watchlist, but there's a very annoying IP there, and I have to go away for a while. PhGustaf ( talk) 00:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Roscelese has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day... Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
We are always looking for more help with the dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push in which we are making sure Wikipedia has an article on every cutaneous condition. With that being said, I wanted to know if you would be willing to help with the Bolognia push? I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for new articles and redirects. --- My Core Competency is Competency ( talk) 23:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the new ref. I moved it up higher in the section. BTW, do you have any thoughts to add to the discussion at The Count of Luxembourg? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 05:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Haymaker ( talk) 11:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I somewhat knew this was coming, but there are things you should know. There was a wave of islamic propaganda hitting wikipedia, due to the work of a single editor called Jagged85. His blatant misuse of sources and even straightforward lies were detected some time ago. It was an embarrasment for wikipedia and it even appeared of certain newspapers and blogs all over the internet. http://ocham.blogspot.com/2010/06/avicennian-logic.html; http://ahp.apps01.yorku.ca/?p=299; http://www.spectator.co.uk/essays/all/5482023/did-al-farabi-really-invent-sociology.thtml; and here´s the evidence. I don´t have any personal problem with muslims.I have problems with propaganda and false claims, no matter where it comes from.-- Knight1993 ( talk) 22:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
On 18 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Action of December 1669, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that engraver Wenceslaus Hollar was an eyewitness to the action of December 1669 off Cadiz, where HMS Mary Rose, under the command of Rear-Admiral John Kempthorne, fought off seven Algerine men-of-war? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Everything is clear in this sentence: "найбільшою жіночою організацією у Європі" or "bigest womans organization in Europe" - http://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/2010/12/29/11244/ ... Anyway, I have written: "one of the bigest" ... Best regards! -- SeikoEn ( talk) 07:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Don't leave spurious warnings for other editors, as you did here. [1] When leaving a warning, be sure to cite diff(s) so that people know what specifically you are talking about. When you leave a warning for an experienced editor, it is best to type out a custom message, rather than the warning templates. See WP:DTTR, which is not policy, but is still good advice. Finally, if a good faith editor is actively working on an article, try asking them about their intentions before jumping them with warnings a few minutes after their edits. They may still be assembling materials and getting ready to add the references you feel are missing. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 05:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I think you may have violated 3RR at The Reader. Would you consider reverting yourself, please? SlimVirgin talk| contribs 06:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
As your first edit today was another revert, I've filed a report on the 3RR board. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 22:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Roscelese reported by User:SlimVirgin (Result: 24h). EdJohnston ( talk) 01:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Roscelese ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I stopped edit warring before the report was made. I was warned for 3RR on the removal of original research - I reverted myself and stopped removing the original research. I was warned on the addition of an OR tag - I stopped adding the OR tag (wasn't able to remove it myself because someone else swooped in and did so before I could). Now that I know that 3RR applies to any edit whether or not it's of the same material, I've stopped violating the rule.* At this point a block is only punitive, not preventative.
Given the large amount of original research still present in the article in question, I request that I be unblocked so that I can continue the task I've already begun, which is to actually find citations for all this stuff. SV has said she's leaving the article, and none of the other editors involved appear to have any interest in doing anything about the original research given that it's been present in the article for months without anyone doing anything about it, so I'd like to continue referencing and improving the article. It seems inadvisable to block the only editor who's trying to find references.
I also ask that the reviewing admin read over the noticeboard report and take note of what parts of the report are in fact a content dispute. I have content issues too, but I didn't take them to Noticeboard. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Mere 24hr block has expired. Note: I would have declined the above request based on WP:NOTTHEM, WP:EW, and the fact that Wikipedia does not have any strict timeframes for improving articles ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry to see you got blocked. I wish you well. A few days ago, you checked in at the AfD debate for Barack Obama speech at Tucson memorial, and commented that you would take another look in a few days. I just wanted to let you know, as an interested editor, that I've tried hard to improve the article. Your observations would be appreciated. All the best. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Brazilian people love U.S. citizens. Many flights from TX, CA, FL, NY, and GE to Brazil exists. You are very welcome. In FEBRUARY, in the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil will be aproved the *SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN BRAZIL* ( [2]), and the pages LGBT rights in Brazil and Recognition of same-sex unions in Brazil need of you. Because will generate a heavy traffic on these pages, and we need you to help in the English spelling of these pages, you understand me? Please help me. Hentzer ( talk) 23:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese,
A few days ago, you added a statement:
I found a National Cancer Institute statement about abortion and breast cancer.(<ref> "Abortion, Miscarriage, and Breast Cancer Risk". National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 2011-01-11.</ref>)
So far, I haven't found a statement from the American Medical Association. Do you know of any?
-- Kevinkor2 ( talk) 13:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
What criteria are you using for notability on the Governor Thomas Johnson High School article? Paul, in Saudi ( talk) 04:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your excellent contributions in various choice related articles through wikipedia. WikiManOne ( talk) 05:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page. Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page. Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Hi Roscelese! Thanks for your comment. To make it easier for somewhat uninvolved bystanders, I suggest you provide a complete argument (i.e. explicitly list the source that supports your position). That will make it easier for third parties to join in. Also, if you cannot come to an agreement, WP:3O would be an option. -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 12:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
FYI - Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Roscelese reported by User:Haymaker .28Result: .29 - Haymaker ( talk) 12:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi thanks for the template - well, not really, a proper comment would have been better. - as you complained I will ask you here - you say on your talkpage "Inclusion on this list does not necessarily mean that a group or its members have committed illegal activity. " - could you please explain what allegations of illegal activity you are accusing these groups of? Also I suggest you take more care with your accusations of vandalism and you read the detailed explanation - WP:VANDALISM - any good faith edit attempting to benefit the project can not be described as vandalism. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi - you have removed a no index template from an uncited sub page you have created - please dont remove the template again as there is no excuse to allow your uncited article to be published in this way through a wikipedia user page. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
In this edit here, you remove the noindox from the uncited user creation - please do not do that again before you at least add citations to support your contentious claims. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
pLEASE STOP ADDINDG UNCITED CATS TO YOUR USERSPAGES - THSMNLS?? Off2riorob ( talk) 21:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
I have given you enuf good faith requests, if you remove the noindex again or you add cats that are attacking and uncited to your userspace I will report you. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Without commenting on anything else here, I just removed the categories from that draft, per Wikipedia:User pages#Categories, templates, and redirects. Adding a colon (:) before the word Category leaves the link visible but does not categorize the page, making it simple to add the page to the desired categories once the draft goes live. Regards, - 2/0 ( cont.) 00:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
User:Roscelese/List of designated hate groups -
Is there special some reason why you are edit warring to keep your uncited article in the search engine results ? Off2riorob ( talk) 02:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:User pages says in the lede - Wikipedia policies concerning the content of pages can and generally do apply to user pages, and users must observe these policies. Please either cite it or remove it from the search engines , imo you should {{NOINDEX}} until it is accepted into project pace, it is presently uncited and attacking organizations and groups. Off2riorob ( talk) 03:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese... I wanted to let you know that I have nominated the article on David Kato to be considered for an appearance on the main page in the Did You Know ...? section. The nomination can be seen at Template talk:Did you know#David Kato. You are most welcome to participate in the discussion of the nomination, should you wish. If the nomination is successful, you will be recognised as one of the authors who contributed significantly to the article. Regards, EdChem ( talk) 06:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Hello. You have
a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Thanks for the help clearing up the Ensoulment#Catholic Church article. I hope my restoring Clowes' citations is okay. Let me know. Thanks— Geremia ( talk) 21:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
(This section contains humor and can be ignored or deleted at a whim.) <humor> Hi Roscelese,
I saw a recent change you made and that reminded me of a funny philosophical question:
</humor>
-- Kevinkor2 ( talk) 12:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
The template {{ noindex}} should not be removed without consensus. See Wikipedia:UP#CMT. - Rrius ( talk) 04:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Please see Burlesque (genre), which has just been brushed up and now makes pretty good sense and is pretty well referenced. Then see the discussion at Talk:Burlesque - going forward and feel free to contribute your thoughts. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at User talk:WikiManOne's talk page.
Hello. You have a new message at User talk:WikiManOne's talk page.
The person you deleted is quite notable as in "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded." Eleven combat tours in Afghanistan and Iraq (there has got to be some sort of record for such things). Mortar platoon sergeant in a ranger battalion for donkey's years. High school athlete, became ordained so he could precide at his soldier's weddings. Quite notable indeed. Perhaps you could talk on the Governor Thomas Johnson High School talk page before you delete things. As for myself, I never met the kid. Paul, in Saudi ( talk) 05:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
I happened to notice this on user:haymaker's talk page and found it condescending and unnecessary. If you have a dispute with haymaker you should report it. Please refrain from WP:UNCIVIL behavior. Consider this a warning. Lionel ( talk) 09:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Haymaker ( talk) 16:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
hi - i'd like to know what it is that could have made it a better edit - hope you're not sore about un-"censoring" my other edits. sorry, i'm a newbie. the iud is a real issue in my country - the Philippines. our constitution protects both the mother and the unborn from the moment of conception (which is fertilization - complete DNA stage). versions of the RH bill enumerate different bc methods, including the iud (which is why the image is there). but i've been trawling through soooooo many blogs of women who've conceived while on the iud. some have carried to full term, while many have miscarried - the pain and suffering it's caused is palpable, but that's beside the point. anyway, it's my country, and our laws, and those are the facts. iuds in the philippines are legal, medically safe, and readily available - but they risk the viability of a fertilized egg. please help me make a good edit because it's information Filipina women should know. Batbear ( talk) 08:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
The edit war there seems to have died down for now. I'm trying to improve the article so we actually focus on what Planned Parenthood does every day rather than the controversies and lawsuits they have been involved in. I certainly welcome your collaboration there, its a big project, but I think PP has enough information available to at least take it to Good Article if not Featured. Wiki Man One 08:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
On 8 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Kato, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after Rolling Stone published photos and addresses of 100 gays and lesbians under the headline "Hang Them", Ugandan gay rights activist David Kato was awarded USh1.5 million in damages? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Noticed your post on User:WikiManOne's talk page (good advice, by the way) and as I normally do when I see a user I haven't seen before, I checked out your userpage (I like learning about people).
With that, I saw you translate articles in French and Italian. I would recommed joining those language Wikipedias. Go to My Preferences at the top and then click "Manage Your Global Account". From there, you can make it so when you go to any of the Wikipedias or Meta, Commons or the like, you will be instantly signed up and joined with your accounts linked together. It is what is called an SUL account. No idea what "SUL" means, but it is linked together. Go here and you will see what I mean by "linked accounts" (site is slow to load).
Also, I would recommend you join (if you haven't already) WP:LGBT. This is the LGBT WikiProject and they are always in need of help and with your translating skills, you could be of great use to them setting up similar projects on the other Wikis.
As always, please feel free to contact me with questions, comments, cookies :) and such. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
When you have a chance can you copy edit that? There's probably a bunch of little errors in there, but I can never seem to catch my own mistakes until like a week later. :) W M O 19:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at WikiManOne's talk page.
Hey,
I'm working on an article for the Margaret Sanger Awards as one of my final projects on here. Its currently in my sandbox so if you want to help fill it in at all, I certainly won't mind. Also, there seems to be a good number of early seemingly notable public figures related to contraceptive access that don't have articles on wikipedia (currently two that I've found that received Sanger awards), would you be interested in helping write some of these once the awards article is done?
Also, I went ahead and took out the sentence you pointed out from the PP History section, I made some other changes to the article so if you want to look over it agian/copy edit it, give input on it on the talk page, etc., that would be great. W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 01:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I'd be interesting in helping. Do you have a plan of campaign so that we don't overlap. It's the sort of thing that I like doing when I get stuck. Best. -- Guillaume Tell 18:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I think we were both wrong about the recent removal of content by the IP user on this page. That material was a large quote from a primary source which is not especially notable and gives undue weight to a specific attack of this person, in violation of our BLP policies. So, their change was correct even though they are probably not sufficiently familiar with Wikipedia policies in order to follow the proper procedure. Marokwitz ( talk) 08:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
For good work with current events articles and keeping them neutral. Kansan ( talk) 21:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
On 15 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aslie Pitter, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Aslie Pitter, founder of Stonewall F.C., Britain's first and most successful gay football club, was made a Member of the Order of the British Empire for his work fighting homophobia in London? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
You've just posted a highly inappropriate template on my Talk page. In suggest you self-revert. It clearly isn't applicable in this situation since the displayed beliefs of the 'closer' are highly relevant to this issue. DeCausa ( talk) 01:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese, just letting you know that I went ahead and filed a WP:ANI report on User:WikiManOne here. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 02:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Not sure whether her article is on your watchlist, but there's a very annoying IP there, and I have to go away for a while. PhGustaf ( talk) 00:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Roscelese has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day... Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)