This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Hello. Could you please take a look at a few diffs I have provide? I'm still a little confused.
This is in regards to this TfD tag of yours [1], an unregistered user's apparent attempt to help [2] and my response [3]. which is somewhat confirmed when I noticed an edit by User:Jdcompguy [4].
All the above rather begs the question: Shouldn't this suppression somehow be done automatically? In fact, what is {{#invoke:Noinclude|noinclude|text=yes}} supposed to be doing. Naively, this looks to me to be precisely the automated suppression needed, but is not working? Perhaps something happened on WP:THURSDAY?
Thank you for your time. DB1729 ( talk) 02:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Noinclude|noinclude|text=yes}}
is explained at
Template talk:Tfm/Archive 1#TfM in template documentation if you really want to delve into technicalities.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 02:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
You deleted almost the entire article that I worked very hard to write on the Sierra Leone Constitution because it was "unsourced." I am going to change it back to the original unless you take the liberty of doing that yourself. The sections that you deleted was a summary of each section the Sierra Leone Constitution that would have been very valuable to the people who live there but don't have the time to read all 97 pages of it. Those sections did not warrant citation because they very clearly came from the text of the constitution itself (see Constitution of the United States which has minimal citations in the sections that summarize the text). Almost anyone (but apparently not you) understands that. I suggest that you read it to understand that my summarization was not disingenuous. I am insulted and disappointed that you cannot see the value that this article has. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.c.gallego ( talk • contribs) 00:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
I am going to change it back to the original unless you take the liberty of doing that yourselfis not acceptable. Wikipedia relies on consensus - if someone reverts your edit, the onus is on you to discuss the issue and find a solution. Making demands of other editrs like this are unacceptable. It's also rude to quote fragments of policies out of context to try to negate what others are saying to you - Pppery is quite right in their assessment. I will give you more feedback on your talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 15:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
What is this "tool" you are referring to? Steel1943 ( talk) 02:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Well actually, you should nominate it for deletion. I understand what you mean, I just wanted to express to Wikipedians how Ukraine is in bad condition due to war crisis. But that okay, maybe I should think about it. By the way, can you give me a favor on helping me improve these pages, Miss Earth 2022, Template:Country data Australian Aboriginal, and Independence referendum, if you wish to. Have a good day. LikeRealTimes I got you a message!📩 13:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello!
Since you helped me some days ago with the Jenkins outputs I thought you'd be a good choice to quench my curiosity on this topic. Does every open task have to be closed (abandoned/merged) sometime or is there no "policy" on this? I was seeing that the list of open tasks extended as far back as 2013, spawning 223 pages. - Klein Muçi ( talk) 09:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for re-adding my name to the FRS list. It keeps on saying that I have not edited in the last 6 months, and that is why it has removed my name from the list. But, that is wholly not true. I have always edited, and am always editing. What is wrong with this bot? Do you have any idea? Itcouldbepossible Talk 02:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. The RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 4#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands has been stalling for quite a long time now, I guess because the consensus or lack thereof is not clear enough. Could you come and gie your opinion so that the RfD can hopefully be closed? Thanks in advance. Veverve ( talk) 14:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Pppery, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, ( t · c) buidhe 17:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hello Pppery: You are invited to take part in my
new game show. Previously, you took part in
my last YouTube-related event, so you may enjoy this one! If not, I still appreciate all you do.
Cheers, –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖
– MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Hey there!
Some months ago you helped me solve a problem with Module:Chart and thus I was thinking if you can consider making a small modification to it. Can you enhance it so when you hover over a bar (in a bar chart) a line is drawn from it to the x axis together with a number showing the exact number that the column is supposed to represent? Is my explanation clear? As it currently is, you can only know the value of the columns approximately. - Klein Muçi ( talk) 11:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Pppery. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. – Joe ( talk) 08:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! Sorry the edit summaries I left when editing the Gasper Crasto article weren't clear. Looking at the history, you'll see I made two edits in a row: one to remove Category:Biography/Sports and games articles needing expert attention (which should not be manually added to an article), and another to add the {{ expert needed}} template that properly adds the category to the article. The article needs more work - I'll add more descriptive tags instead. Happy editing! GoingBatty ( talk) 22:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey. I will clarify that IP was my cousin's account. As a result, I will still apologize and you expect that it won't happen again. Noobguy33 ( supernoob) ( talk) 14:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The TFD notice on {{ Chu shogi diagram}} has been removed as I could not find the proposal at TFD. Techie3 ( talk) 02:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Pppery, User_talk:GreenC_bot#Flagging_non-dead_link_as_dead probably has some relation to Wikipedia:AWSURL/oldstock. I made a proposal to convert these academia.edu/download/ links to cloudfront.net URLs - Green C 06:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
can you give me any reason what ı did wrong ı search that information ı dont' use any copyrigthed photos or anything else can you explain this to me? Volkan1881 ( talk) 13:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
delete it in two minutes; it was more like two and a half hours between your unredirection and my revert. Second, WP:IWORKEDSOHARD is not a valid argument. Third,
ı [sic] rules of editing fictional character pagesare to cite reliable sources, as I explained above. Wikipedia:Everything you need to know * Pppery * it has begun... 13:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm a little unhappy with what's going on at AfD with Michael Laski. You've closed the AfD, so I'm writing here, but this is probably also relevant to Scope creep, Hey man im josh and Laski22. I'm also going to ping Liz as a neutral admin heavily involved in AfD who might be able to shed light. What appears to have happened is
Thanks for adding you signature. We haven't asked for that yet because it's not final. I just changed it again. I don't want anyone to be upset because it changed after they signed... MB 04:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that shortdesc edit by me -- it was an edit conflict and I forgot to revert it once I saw the redirect move. Cheers, Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ ( talk / contribs) 02:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
I haven't the slightest idea what happened. [5] Thanks for reverting. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 23:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Dr vulpes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Indigenous science, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 19:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with the Indigenous science article, it was a lot of work to recover and fix that article. You've been a lot of help and really professional so thanks again. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 05:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC) |
Please don't delete ne pahe named ioE AI i will make change then publish it again. Bot786 ( talk) 21:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to reach out regarding recent edits to Velma Salabiye's wikipedia. I mean no disrespect. But are you the original author of her page? Perhaps a colleague of hers? A relative? I only ask as I am the significant other of Velma's niece, who had a very close relationship with her aunt. Upon finding the Wikipedia for Ms Salabiye, the family was excited and asked me to fill in specific information that was missing. I appreciate any reply. Lightfoot92 ( talk) 00:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I was having sn issue with trying to remove the expression error and couldn't find a way to do so. Also, almost all Wikipedia pages about people tend to add specific information (parents, family, DOB and Date of Death, etc.,.), which was mainly all I was adding. Thank you again for the feedback. Lightfoot92 ( talk) 04:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey did you ever get the ping in this discussion? If not, I think something is wrong with the ping system. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Here is a semihemidemibarnstar for For moving my mislisted request to delete a redirect |
Lineagegeek ( talk) 22:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my stub pages. BloxyColaSweet ( talk) 23:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
BloxyColaSweet has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
sorry about that, I think we edit conflicted. I think a G4 would have been declined but we'll see how the AfD shakes out. Star Mississippi 00:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
The article page will be a summary page of all conferences of the said tournament. Reconsider to revert/undo what you did. Volley000 ( talk) 08:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Hello. Could you please take a look at a few diffs I have provide? I'm still a little confused.
This is in regards to this TfD tag of yours [1], an unregistered user's apparent attempt to help [2] and my response [3]. which is somewhat confirmed when I noticed an edit by User:Jdcompguy [4].
All the above rather begs the question: Shouldn't this suppression somehow be done automatically? In fact, what is {{#invoke:Noinclude|noinclude|text=yes}} supposed to be doing. Naively, this looks to me to be precisely the automated suppression needed, but is not working? Perhaps something happened on WP:THURSDAY?
Thank you for your time. DB1729 ( talk) 02:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Noinclude|noinclude|text=yes}}
is explained at
Template talk:Tfm/Archive 1#TfM in template documentation if you really want to delve into technicalities.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 02:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
You deleted almost the entire article that I worked very hard to write on the Sierra Leone Constitution because it was "unsourced." I am going to change it back to the original unless you take the liberty of doing that yourself. The sections that you deleted was a summary of each section the Sierra Leone Constitution that would have been very valuable to the people who live there but don't have the time to read all 97 pages of it. Those sections did not warrant citation because they very clearly came from the text of the constitution itself (see Constitution of the United States which has minimal citations in the sections that summarize the text). Almost anyone (but apparently not you) understands that. I suggest that you read it to understand that my summarization was not disingenuous. I am insulted and disappointed that you cannot see the value that this article has. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.c.gallego ( talk • contribs) 00:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
I am going to change it back to the original unless you take the liberty of doing that yourselfis not acceptable. Wikipedia relies on consensus - if someone reverts your edit, the onus is on you to discuss the issue and find a solution. Making demands of other editrs like this are unacceptable. It's also rude to quote fragments of policies out of context to try to negate what others are saying to you - Pppery is quite right in their assessment. I will give you more feedback on your talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 15:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
What is this "tool" you are referring to? Steel1943 ( talk) 02:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Well actually, you should nominate it for deletion. I understand what you mean, I just wanted to express to Wikipedians how Ukraine is in bad condition due to war crisis. But that okay, maybe I should think about it. By the way, can you give me a favor on helping me improve these pages, Miss Earth 2022, Template:Country data Australian Aboriginal, and Independence referendum, if you wish to. Have a good day. LikeRealTimes I got you a message!📩 13:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello!
Since you helped me some days ago with the Jenkins outputs I thought you'd be a good choice to quench my curiosity on this topic. Does every open task have to be closed (abandoned/merged) sometime or is there no "policy" on this? I was seeing that the list of open tasks extended as far back as 2013, spawning 223 pages. - Klein Muçi ( talk) 09:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for re-adding my name to the FRS list. It keeps on saying that I have not edited in the last 6 months, and that is why it has removed my name from the list. But, that is wholly not true. I have always edited, and am always editing. What is wrong with this bot? Do you have any idea? Itcouldbepossible Talk 02:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. The RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 4#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands has been stalling for quite a long time now, I guess because the consensus or lack thereof is not clear enough. Could you come and gie your opinion so that the RfD can hopefully be closed? Thanks in advance. Veverve ( talk) 14:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Pppery, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, ( t · c) buidhe 17:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hello Pppery: You are invited to take part in my
new game show. Previously, you took part in
my last YouTube-related event, so you may enjoy this one! If not, I still appreciate all you do.
Cheers, –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖
– MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Hey there!
Some months ago you helped me solve a problem with Module:Chart and thus I was thinking if you can consider making a small modification to it. Can you enhance it so when you hover over a bar (in a bar chart) a line is drawn from it to the x axis together with a number showing the exact number that the column is supposed to represent? Is my explanation clear? As it currently is, you can only know the value of the columns approximately. - Klein Muçi ( talk) 11:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Pppery. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. – Joe ( talk) 08:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! Sorry the edit summaries I left when editing the Gasper Crasto article weren't clear. Looking at the history, you'll see I made two edits in a row: one to remove Category:Biography/Sports and games articles needing expert attention (which should not be manually added to an article), and another to add the {{ expert needed}} template that properly adds the category to the article. The article needs more work - I'll add more descriptive tags instead. Happy editing! GoingBatty ( talk) 22:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey. I will clarify that IP was my cousin's account. As a result, I will still apologize and you expect that it won't happen again. Noobguy33 ( supernoob) ( talk) 14:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The TFD notice on {{ Chu shogi diagram}} has been removed as I could not find the proposal at TFD. Techie3 ( talk) 02:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Pppery, User_talk:GreenC_bot#Flagging_non-dead_link_as_dead probably has some relation to Wikipedia:AWSURL/oldstock. I made a proposal to convert these academia.edu/download/ links to cloudfront.net URLs - Green C 06:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
can you give me any reason what ı did wrong ı search that information ı dont' use any copyrigthed photos or anything else can you explain this to me? Volkan1881 ( talk) 13:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
delete it in two minutes; it was more like two and a half hours between your unredirection and my revert. Second, WP:IWORKEDSOHARD is not a valid argument. Third,
ı [sic] rules of editing fictional character pagesare to cite reliable sources, as I explained above. Wikipedia:Everything you need to know * Pppery * it has begun... 13:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm a little unhappy with what's going on at AfD with Michael Laski. You've closed the AfD, so I'm writing here, but this is probably also relevant to Scope creep, Hey man im josh and Laski22. I'm also going to ping Liz as a neutral admin heavily involved in AfD who might be able to shed light. What appears to have happened is
Thanks for adding you signature. We haven't asked for that yet because it's not final. I just changed it again. I don't want anyone to be upset because it changed after they signed... MB 04:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that shortdesc edit by me -- it was an edit conflict and I forgot to revert it once I saw the redirect move. Cheers, Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ ( talk / contribs) 02:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
I haven't the slightest idea what happened. [5] Thanks for reverting. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 23:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Dr vulpes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Indigenous science, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 19:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with the Indigenous science article, it was a lot of work to recover and fix that article. You've been a lot of help and really professional so thanks again. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 05:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC) |
Please don't delete ne pahe named ioE AI i will make change then publish it again. Bot786 ( talk) 21:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to reach out regarding recent edits to Velma Salabiye's wikipedia. I mean no disrespect. But are you the original author of her page? Perhaps a colleague of hers? A relative? I only ask as I am the significant other of Velma's niece, who had a very close relationship with her aunt. Upon finding the Wikipedia for Ms Salabiye, the family was excited and asked me to fill in specific information that was missing. I appreciate any reply. Lightfoot92 ( talk) 00:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I was having sn issue with trying to remove the expression error and couldn't find a way to do so. Also, almost all Wikipedia pages about people tend to add specific information (parents, family, DOB and Date of Death, etc.,.), which was mainly all I was adding. Thank you again for the feedback. Lightfoot92 ( talk) 04:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey did you ever get the ping in this discussion? If not, I think something is wrong with the ping system. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Here is a semihemidemibarnstar for For moving my mislisted request to delete a redirect |
Lineagegeek ( talk) 22:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my stub pages. BloxyColaSweet ( talk) 23:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
BloxyColaSweet has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
sorry about that, I think we edit conflicted. I think a G4 would have been declined but we'll see how the AfD shakes out. Star Mississippi 00:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
The article page will be a summary page of all conferences of the said tournament. Reconsider to revert/undo what you did. Volley000 ( talk) 08:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)