|
Hi Oughtta Be Otters! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC) |
|
Hey, @CoreyBBaker, seeing if this works to ping you.
We were discussing getting a start on a page, even if you know you might have to leave it as a stub, or (alternately) how to write an intro paragraph.
1. Your first job is to prove that the topic of your page is notable. Really, the first sentence is the heavy-hitter on this task. 2. Imagine this is a fleshed out, high quality article. What do you think the section headings would be? You don't need to cover all of them, but think about important sections, such as audience, history, and geographic coverage (maybe?) in the topic we were discussing. 3. Figure out the big idea for each of those topics.
I think that would probably do justice as a starting article/intro paragraph. But excited to see what you come up with!
Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 00:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, Oughtta Be Otters, and welcome to Women in Red. It's always good to have more librarians as members, especially those introduced through Wiki Ed. Further to your ideas expressed above, when you feel ready to create a biography, you should look through our Ten Simple Rules and our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ipigott, Thank you for the warm welcome!
- I would not hate feedback on what I have done so far, so I can do better in the future, should you have some time.
- So far, I wrote Herschelle Sullivan Challenor from scratch, and have put in some significant work on Toni Stone and Xiaolan Bao. I struggle when (like with Ms. Bao) there is simply not a lot to be found, regardless of how I dig.
- Anyway, thanks for the welcome! Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 18:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- I see you've made a pretty good start on Herschelle Sullivan Challenor. I've added the template "authority control" (always useful for biographies as it automatically turns up useful links once they have been created) and added a couple of categories. Although you have listed a timeline of the main developments in her career, you have presented this as a list. It would be far better to present it as running text, as in
Toni Stone for example. Lists are acceptable for publications and in some cases for awards but sections on how a person's life has developed should be in normal prose. Have a go at adapting it yourself and let me know when you want me to take a new look.--
Ipigott (
talk) 10:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
-
Ipigott, Thank you for this excellent feedback. It is not terribly graceful, but now Dr. Callenor's career is in a narrative form. Next, I need to look back and figure out how I skipped so many footnotes, so more will be forthcoming.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 21:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- It's much better now but you should make sure there's at least one ref for each paragraph. In general, paragraphs should have three or more sentences. If you do this in the career section, you can simply include one ref at the end of each paragraph. Keep up the good work.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
Ipigott, Thank you for this excellent feedback. It is not terribly graceful, but now Dr. Callenor's career is in a narrative form. Next, I need to look back and figure out how I skipped so many footnotes, so more will be forthcoming.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 21:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- I see you've made a pretty good start on Herschelle Sullivan Challenor. I've added the template "authority control" (always useful for biographies as it automatically turns up useful links once they have been created) and added a couple of categories. Although you have listed a timeline of the main developments in her career, you have presented this as a list. It would be far better to present it as running text, as in
Toni Stone for example. Lists are acceptable for publications and in some cases for awards but sections on how a person's life has developed should be in normal prose. Have a go at adapting it yourself and let me know when you want me to take a new look.--
Ipigott (
talk) 10:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 ( talk) 17:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Westpac Outstanding Women Award for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Westpac_Outstanding_Women_Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DGG ( talk ) 11:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
As a caveat, I have limited on-line ability right now. My sister broke her hip over the weekend and I have been tending her, but I will respond...it just may be several days before I do. I am in need of this and this. The first one I have not really tried to find from a library yet. I did find a copy for sale, but the price is crazy and mail service to Mexico is terrible. The second, I have written to the Library of Congress (their copy is in a facility that is closed due to Covid), the University of Houston (cannot find it in their shelves), the University of Texas (can only provide copies to students or staff), and Tulane (haven't heard back from). I cannot find any copy for sale and Google says they cannot sell me a limited license. No worries if you cannot find them, but on the off chance that you might, I thought I'd ask. SusunW ( talk) 20:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- SusunW, My mind is pretty blown by what you are doing, and I would love to make this one of my projects. I might be able to find others who can help, as well, btw. I'll start asking around. And looking for the docs.
- I am terribly sorry to hear about your sister. I hope that both you and she remain healthy, safe, and on the mend!
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 22:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've ignored the topic for years, but it is a huge obstacle on WP. People constantly want to categorize women by their nationality and I have to keep explaining they didn't have any. Most people do not understand the reason women had no civil or political rights was quite simply because they had no nationality, thus no jurisdiction to appeal to to demand their rights be protected. I finally decided to bite the bullet and try to work on it. It's daunting, as most sources that cover nationality don't cover the issue and researching every country is overwhelming. But, I am pretty tenacious when it comes to research and just never give up. Having helpers would be awesome and I would be most grateful.
SusunW (
talk) 23:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, They are at some libraries near to me, but they will all be closed due to COVID. Some may also be available to check out as ebooks. Do you happen to know what you need or what you are looking for, precisely?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for circling back to this OBO. To be absolutely honest, I don't know. Lots of books on constitutional history do not address the issue of nationality at all, and certainly not women's loss of nationality. On the Guyana book, since they used the Concept Plan of Redress from 1787 to 1928, it'd be helpful to know what it said about who was considered to be Guyanese. All I have been able to glean from other sources is that the plan was Dutch but the British kept it in place with modifications. Our article on the Constitution of Guyana, has absolutely no data on whether any constitution laid out rules for nationality, merely the political structure the constitution established. So pretty much anything that any constitution said about nationality?
- The other book by Vetancourt I know not only discusses nationality, but addresses the issue of women losing their nationality. I don't really know what he says about all of the countries, but for example, he specifically stated that while Ecuador's laws did not state specifics about married women losing their nationality, custom and implication denationalized married women. The chapter on Ecuador was reprinted in a Venezuelan journal, which is what made me realize the importance of the book for my purposes. I think it will be necessary to review his summary on each country. I heard back from Texas A & M today and was advised they have "removed this book from our collection". Honestly, I would buy a copy if I could find one, but so far, every library I have contacted does not have it even though world cat says they do. I even heard back from Google and they confirmed that they cannot sell me a single license for it due to copyright concerns. It's frustrating to say the least.
SusunW (
talk) 06:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, Sounds good -- I will see what I can do on this end. We shall see....
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh! question--If I have info on Papua New Guinea, do you have a model article that I can look at to see how you would like it covered?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. You can look at any of the sections I've written for South America. If there is a "Fooian nationality law" article, I think all the stuff for each country will just be able to move into a heading "History". I haven't posted anything in the law articles yet, as I realized that they were all borrowing codes from each other so it would be easier to do the whole group and make sure it is all covered. Basically we need to know when did married women lose nationality, when did they no longer lose it, if and when women could pass on their nationality to children, etc. It's a work in progress, so I'm open to suggestions.
SusunW (
talk) 23:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, and
this might help with PNG.
SusunW (
talk) 13:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- I know it's kind of hard to understand the concept, as it is still developing, but, today I moved
Argentina and summarized the data in the
chart. Perhaps that makes it easier to visualize?
SusunW (
talk) 16:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- SusunW, Slowly wrapping my mind around this concept! Question: a friend of mine at a large research institution was able to look through _A Constitutional History of British Guiana_ and found essentially three passages that could be helpful (cannot arrange a loan of the book, sadly). She sent me images of about a paragraph per passage. I would say they are a small enough portion of the work to be fair use to share with you, but I am not sure the best way to get you the three images? Can you please give me a sense of the best way to get the info to you? Sadly, she does not speak Spanish, with regard to the other book.
- Clementi, Cecil. A Constitutional History of British Guiana. London, England: Macmillan and Co, Limited, 1937. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 00:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- I know it's kind of hard to understand the concept, as it is still developing, but, today I moved
Argentina and summarized the data in the
chart. Perhaps that makes it easier to visualize?
SusunW (
talk) 16:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, and
this might help with PNG.
SusunW (
talk) 13:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. You can look at any of the sections I've written for South America. If there is a "Fooian nationality law" article, I think all the stuff for each country will just be able to move into a heading "History". I haven't posted anything in the law articles yet, as I realized that they were all borrowing codes from each other so it would be easier to do the whole group and make sure it is all covered. Basically we need to know when did married women lose nationality, when did they no longer lose it, if and when women could pass on their nationality to children, etc. It's a work in progress, so I'm open to suggestions.
SusunW (
talk) 23:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh! question--If I have info on Papua New Guinea, do you have a model article that I can look at to see how you would like it covered?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, Sounds good -- I will see what I can do on this end. We shall see....
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, They are at some libraries near to me, but they will all be closed due to COVID. Some may also be available to check out as ebooks. Do you happen to know what you need or what you are looking for, precisely?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I've ignored the topic for years, but it is a huge obstacle on WP. People constantly want to categorize women by their nationality and I have to keep explaining they didn't have any. Most people do not understand the reason women had no civil or political rights was quite simply because they had no nationality, thus no jurisdiction to appeal to to demand their rights be protected. I finally decided to bite the bullet and try to work on it. It's daunting, as most sources that cover nationality don't cover the issue and researching every country is overwhelming. But, I am pretty tenacious when it comes to research and just never give up. Having helpers would be awesome and I would be most grateful.
SusunW (
talk) 23:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Oooh, that's fabulous. Thank you so much! On my page, you can e-mail me. Just look at the left hand task bar for "Email this user". I contacted a professor in Utah who has contacts in Venezuela and is looking for the Vetancourt book there. May not find it, but it's worth a shot. SusunW ( talk) 05:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- SusunW, Hmm, seems the email does not allow images, so I'll type up the text for you. Stay tuned, it may take a few days for me to find the time.
- Best Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 06:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Cookies! | |
|
CommanderWaterford has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}! |
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, I found your name on the list of members at WikiProject Women's History as you mentioned being interested in women in contemporary US society & US History, and I wanted to see if you would be able to help with a requested expansion of the Time's Up (movement) History. I've posted a request and link to the draft on the article Talk page. Although I posted notes at a couple WikiProjects there haven't been any replies yet. Would you be willing to look? Thanks for any help, Hope with Time's Up ( talk) 22:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters -- With the goal of helping to progress the WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) women’s rights-themed GA nomination goal for 2021, I’m proposing that WiG hold a special editathon event in the fall (maybe October/November?). I can assist with logistics, but I need to know how much interest/support there might be from WiG participants first. Please let me know what you think in the talk page conversation! All the best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 02:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in October 2021!
Running from 1 through 31 October 2021, WikiProject Women in Green is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women's rights. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing women's rights-related GA submissions during the event period, with resources and one-on-one support provided by experienced Women in Green GA reviewers. Participants have the opportunity to receive a barnstar.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 00:17, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Oughtta Be Otters ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 64.62.148.241. The IP range on our primary internet link is: 64.62.148.194 through 64.62.148.254; The IP range on our backup internet link is: 64.60.251.82 through 64.60.251.86. I am a frequent editor and in fact have done some counter vandalism training. I also oversee school projects on Simple English Wikipedia from this IP address in collaboration with SEW ambassadors and have been doing so for nine years. Looking at the blocked IP address, I do not see any record of vandalism - or any editing at all - from this address. I would be grateful to know the reason for the block and get help removing it. Thank you. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 19:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your IP is part of a pretty wide range that's been blocked. And unfortunately this sort of block is not one that we regular admins are allowed to just lift this way. What you need to do is go to WP:IPECPROXY and go through the process of getting approved for an IP block exemption. It looks like you have a pretty good track record as an editor so I think you have a pretty good chance. — Daniel Case ( talk) 20:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Thank you
Daniel Case (
talk. Yes, I had us exempted from this block a few years ago via Simple English Wikipedia. Thanks for pointing me to the right path, it is easier to understand on that property.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Daniel Case ( talk) 20:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you
Daniel Case (
talk. Yes, I had us exempted from this block a few years ago via Simple English Wikipedia. Thanks for pointing me to the right path, it is easier to understand on that property.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
 | Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Oughtta Be Otters,
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 ( talk) 15:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Oughtta Be Otters,
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 ( talk) 16:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Oughtta Be Otters
Thank you for creating Yuriko Kimura.
User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Once you get to 25 non-deleted articles, you self-nominate for the autopatrolled right.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ I dream of horses: thank you, I will keep that in mind! Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 21:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi! Thanks for creating the page on Sarah Haoda Todd, and for reaching out. After some thought I've changed the tags on the article. If I were to make one suggestion for improving the article, it would be to avoid flowery language and editorializing. For instance:
- "On December 14, 2012 their dream was realized with the formal launch of the Indigenous Business Council"
- "Haoda Todd recalls that she had to figure out many of the ins and outs of running a business as she got started. Many times she wanted to give up."
- "Haoda Todd has maintained an active and engaged civic life. Clearly, she has cultivated a voice of moral authority in her community."
Again, thank you for the work you've put into the article. – Ploni ( talk) 16:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in July 2022!
Running from July 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women and the environment. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works during the event period (with an emphasis on environmental links and topics). GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 13:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn ( talk) 23 September 2022
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Oughtta Be Otters! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Oughtta Be Otters ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 64.62.148.241. The IP range on our primary internet link is: 64.62.148.194 through 64.62.148.254; The IP range on our backup internet link is: 64.60.251.82 through 64.60.251.86. I am a frequent editor and in fact have done some counter vandalism training. I also oversee school projects on Simple English Wikipedia from this IP address in collaboration with SEW ambassadors and have been doing so for nine years. Looking at the blocked IP address, I do not see any record of vandalism - or any editing at all - from this address.
Last year I was also caught in this broad IP Range block and it seems that my exemption has expried.
I will go to WP:IPECPROXY and go through the process of getting approved for an IP block exemption, but since I can only post when at home, I thought I would start by checking here.
Thank you. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 13:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I have renewed your IP exemption for another year. Welcome back. PhilKnight ( talk) 18:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 13:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Oughtta Be Otters
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Angela Jackson (disambiguation), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
* Pppery * it has begun... 01:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @ Pppery: - thanks, I was not sure. I have a question, however: In the course of checking what was on Wikipedia about each of the two Angela Jacksons in question, I discovered there is another Angela Jackson who was referredto on a number of pages, so I am drafting a page for her, as well (she is a women's basketball coach, although -- in the course of researching her -- I came across a *fourth* Angela Jackson and am considering putting a page together for her, as well (another basketball coach, but of men's teams).
- So, if there are about to be 3-4 Angela Jacksons with pages, I am wondering if I should keep the disambiguation page? Or are the hatnotes that I made enough and should I just add more at the top of each page?
- I will admit that part of my thinking is that Angela Jackson is a very common name, and I suspect that there are actually quite a number of notable individuals by the name out there.
- So, I might have jumped the gun on making the disambiguation page...but not sure if it might not be necessary fairly soon?
- Thank you
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 04:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, with 3-4 entries listed then a disambiguation page becomes useful. The commonness of the name does not matter, only the number of people actually listed on the disambiguation page. And there's no need to try to predict the future by trying to keep the disambiguation page before adding more entries.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 05:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @
Pppery: OK, I'll post the page I was drafting today and add the third individual to the disambiguation page. It is already significantly longer than Women in Red's recommended starter page. Then, as I understand it, I should change the hatnote to a disambiguation link.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yep. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @
Pppery: OK, I'll post the page I was drafting today and add the third individual to the disambiguation page. It is already significantly longer than Women in Red's recommended starter page. Then, as I understand it, I should change the hatnote to a disambiguation link.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, with 3-4 entries listed then a disambiguation page becomes useful. The commonness of the name does not matter, only the number of people actually listed on the disambiguation page. And there's no need to try to predict the future by trying to keep the disambiguation page before adding more entries.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 05:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome Oughtta Be Otters!
I'm Jeffrey (Wiki Ed), one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the
3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
Jeffrey (Wiki Ed) (
talk) 15:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking for a period of 2 years. If you still need an IP block exemption after it expires please file a new request. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. DatGuy Talk Contribs 10:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am so grateful! It helps to be able to participate in my WikiScholars course while at work, as well as teaching my students editing skills when needed. Thank you. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 14:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 25 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iona Allen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iona Allen, "the only one to ever make a perfect pair of boots", constructed the pair worn by Neil Armstrong on the Moon out of thirteen layers of precisely fabricated material? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iona Allen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Iona Allen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 14,801 views (616.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2024 – nice work! |
GalliumBot ( talk • contribs) (he/ it) 03:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Oughtta Be Otters! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC) |
|
Hey, @CoreyBBaker, seeing if this works to ping you.
We were discussing getting a start on a page, even if you know you might have to leave it as a stub, or (alternately) how to write an intro paragraph.
1. Your first job is to prove that the topic of your page is notable. Really, the first sentence is the heavy-hitter on this task. 2. Imagine this is a fleshed out, high quality article. What do you think the section headings would be? You don't need to cover all of them, but think about important sections, such as audience, history, and geographic coverage (maybe?) in the topic we were discussing. 3. Figure out the big idea for each of those topics.
I think that would probably do justice as a starting article/intro paragraph. But excited to see what you come up with!
Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 00:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, Oughtta Be Otters, and welcome to Women in Red. It's always good to have more librarians as members, especially those introduced through Wiki Ed. Further to your ideas expressed above, when you feel ready to create a biography, you should look through our Ten Simple Rules and our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ipigott, Thank you for the warm welcome!
- I would not hate feedback on what I have done so far, so I can do better in the future, should you have some time.
- So far, I wrote Herschelle Sullivan Challenor from scratch, and have put in some significant work on Toni Stone and Xiaolan Bao. I struggle when (like with Ms. Bao) there is simply not a lot to be found, regardless of how I dig.
- Anyway, thanks for the welcome! Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 18:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- I see you've made a pretty good start on Herschelle Sullivan Challenor. I've added the template "authority control" (always useful for biographies as it automatically turns up useful links once they have been created) and added a couple of categories. Although you have listed a timeline of the main developments in her career, you have presented this as a list. It would be far better to present it as running text, as in
Toni Stone for example. Lists are acceptable for publications and in some cases for awards but sections on how a person's life has developed should be in normal prose. Have a go at adapting it yourself and let me know when you want me to take a new look.--
Ipigott (
talk) 10:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
-
Ipigott, Thank you for this excellent feedback. It is not terribly graceful, but now Dr. Callenor's career is in a narrative form. Next, I need to look back and figure out how I skipped so many footnotes, so more will be forthcoming.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 21:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- It's much better now but you should make sure there's at least one ref for each paragraph. In general, paragraphs should have three or more sentences. If you do this in the career section, you can simply include one ref at the end of each paragraph. Keep up the good work.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
Ipigott, Thank you for this excellent feedback. It is not terribly graceful, but now Dr. Callenor's career is in a narrative form. Next, I need to look back and figure out how I skipped so many footnotes, so more will be forthcoming.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 21:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- I see you've made a pretty good start on Herschelle Sullivan Challenor. I've added the template "authority control" (always useful for biographies as it automatically turns up useful links once they have been created) and added a couple of categories. Although you have listed a timeline of the main developments in her career, you have presented this as a list. It would be far better to present it as running text, as in
Toni Stone for example. Lists are acceptable for publications and in some cases for awards but sections on how a person's life has developed should be in normal prose. Have a go at adapting it yourself and let me know when you want me to take a new look.--
Ipigott (
talk) 10:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 ( talk) 17:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Westpac Outstanding Women Award for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Westpac_Outstanding_Women_Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DGG ( talk ) 11:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
As a caveat, I have limited on-line ability right now. My sister broke her hip over the weekend and I have been tending her, but I will respond...it just may be several days before I do. I am in need of this and this. The first one I have not really tried to find from a library yet. I did find a copy for sale, but the price is crazy and mail service to Mexico is terrible. The second, I have written to the Library of Congress (their copy is in a facility that is closed due to Covid), the University of Houston (cannot find it in their shelves), the University of Texas (can only provide copies to students or staff), and Tulane (haven't heard back from). I cannot find any copy for sale and Google says they cannot sell me a limited license. No worries if you cannot find them, but on the off chance that you might, I thought I'd ask. SusunW ( talk) 20:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- SusunW, My mind is pretty blown by what you are doing, and I would love to make this one of my projects. I might be able to find others who can help, as well, btw. I'll start asking around. And looking for the docs.
- I am terribly sorry to hear about your sister. I hope that both you and she remain healthy, safe, and on the mend!
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 22:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've ignored the topic for years, but it is a huge obstacle on WP. People constantly want to categorize women by their nationality and I have to keep explaining they didn't have any. Most people do not understand the reason women had no civil or political rights was quite simply because they had no nationality, thus no jurisdiction to appeal to to demand their rights be protected. I finally decided to bite the bullet and try to work on it. It's daunting, as most sources that cover nationality don't cover the issue and researching every country is overwhelming. But, I am pretty tenacious when it comes to research and just never give up. Having helpers would be awesome and I would be most grateful.
SusunW (
talk) 23:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, They are at some libraries near to me, but they will all be closed due to COVID. Some may also be available to check out as ebooks. Do you happen to know what you need or what you are looking for, precisely?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for circling back to this OBO. To be absolutely honest, I don't know. Lots of books on constitutional history do not address the issue of nationality at all, and certainly not women's loss of nationality. On the Guyana book, since they used the Concept Plan of Redress from 1787 to 1928, it'd be helpful to know what it said about who was considered to be Guyanese. All I have been able to glean from other sources is that the plan was Dutch but the British kept it in place with modifications. Our article on the Constitution of Guyana, has absolutely no data on whether any constitution laid out rules for nationality, merely the political structure the constitution established. So pretty much anything that any constitution said about nationality?
- The other book by Vetancourt I know not only discusses nationality, but addresses the issue of women losing their nationality. I don't really know what he says about all of the countries, but for example, he specifically stated that while Ecuador's laws did not state specifics about married women losing their nationality, custom and implication denationalized married women. The chapter on Ecuador was reprinted in a Venezuelan journal, which is what made me realize the importance of the book for my purposes. I think it will be necessary to review his summary on each country. I heard back from Texas A & M today and was advised they have "removed this book from our collection". Honestly, I would buy a copy if I could find one, but so far, every library I have contacted does not have it even though world cat says they do. I even heard back from Google and they confirmed that they cannot sell me a single license for it due to copyright concerns. It's frustrating to say the least.
SusunW (
talk) 06:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, Sounds good -- I will see what I can do on this end. We shall see....
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh! question--If I have info on Papua New Guinea, do you have a model article that I can look at to see how you would like it covered?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. You can look at any of the sections I've written for South America. If there is a "Fooian nationality law" article, I think all the stuff for each country will just be able to move into a heading "History". I haven't posted anything in the law articles yet, as I realized that they were all borrowing codes from each other so it would be easier to do the whole group and make sure it is all covered. Basically we need to know when did married women lose nationality, when did they no longer lose it, if and when women could pass on their nationality to children, etc. It's a work in progress, so I'm open to suggestions.
SusunW (
talk) 23:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, and
this might help with PNG.
SusunW (
talk) 13:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- I know it's kind of hard to understand the concept, as it is still developing, but, today I moved
Argentina and summarized the data in the
chart. Perhaps that makes it easier to visualize?
SusunW (
talk) 16:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- SusunW, Slowly wrapping my mind around this concept! Question: a friend of mine at a large research institution was able to look through _A Constitutional History of British Guiana_ and found essentially three passages that could be helpful (cannot arrange a loan of the book, sadly). She sent me images of about a paragraph per passage. I would say they are a small enough portion of the work to be fair use to share with you, but I am not sure the best way to get you the three images? Can you please give me a sense of the best way to get the info to you? Sadly, she does not speak Spanish, with regard to the other book.
- Clementi, Cecil. A Constitutional History of British Guiana. London, England: Macmillan and Co, Limited, 1937. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 00:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- I know it's kind of hard to understand the concept, as it is still developing, but, today I moved
Argentina and summarized the data in the
chart. Perhaps that makes it easier to visualize?
SusunW (
talk) 16:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, and
this might help with PNG.
SusunW (
talk) 13:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. You can look at any of the sections I've written for South America. If there is a "Fooian nationality law" article, I think all the stuff for each country will just be able to move into a heading "History". I haven't posted anything in the law articles yet, as I realized that they were all borrowing codes from each other so it would be easier to do the whole group and make sure it is all covered. Basically we need to know when did married women lose nationality, when did they no longer lose it, if and when women could pass on their nationality to children, etc. It's a work in progress, so I'm open to suggestions.
SusunW (
talk) 23:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh! question--If I have info on Papua New Guinea, do you have a model article that I can look at to see how you would like it covered?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, Sounds good -- I will see what I can do on this end. We shall see....
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
-
SusunW, They are at some libraries near to me, but they will all be closed due to COVID. Some may also be available to check out as ebooks. Do you happen to know what you need or what you are looking for, precisely?
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I've ignored the topic for years, but it is a huge obstacle on WP. People constantly want to categorize women by their nationality and I have to keep explaining they didn't have any. Most people do not understand the reason women had no civil or political rights was quite simply because they had no nationality, thus no jurisdiction to appeal to to demand their rights be protected. I finally decided to bite the bullet and try to work on it. It's daunting, as most sources that cover nationality don't cover the issue and researching every country is overwhelming. But, I am pretty tenacious when it comes to research and just never give up. Having helpers would be awesome and I would be most grateful.
SusunW (
talk) 23:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Oooh, that's fabulous. Thank you so much! On my page, you can e-mail me. Just look at the left hand task bar for "Email this user". I contacted a professor in Utah who has contacts in Venezuela and is looking for the Vetancourt book there. May not find it, but it's worth a shot. SusunW ( talk) 05:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- SusunW, Hmm, seems the email does not allow images, so I'll type up the text for you. Stay tuned, it may take a few days for me to find the time.
- Best Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 06:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Cookies! | |
|
CommanderWaterford has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}! |
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, I found your name on the list of members at WikiProject Women's History as you mentioned being interested in women in contemporary US society & US History, and I wanted to see if you would be able to help with a requested expansion of the Time's Up (movement) History. I've posted a request and link to the draft on the article Talk page. Although I posted notes at a couple WikiProjects there haven't been any replies yet. Would you be willing to look? Thanks for any help, Hope with Time's Up ( talk) 22:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters -- With the goal of helping to progress the WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) women’s rights-themed GA nomination goal for 2021, I’m proposing that WiG hold a special editathon event in the fall (maybe October/November?). I can assist with logistics, but I need to know how much interest/support there might be from WiG participants first. Please let me know what you think in the talk page conversation! All the best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 02:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in October 2021!
Running from 1 through 31 October 2021, WikiProject Women in Green is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women's rights. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing women's rights-related GA submissions during the event period, with resources and one-on-one support provided by experienced Women in Green GA reviewers. Participants have the opportunity to receive a barnstar.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 00:17, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Oughtta Be Otters ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 64.62.148.241. The IP range on our primary internet link is: 64.62.148.194 through 64.62.148.254; The IP range on our backup internet link is: 64.60.251.82 through 64.60.251.86. I am a frequent editor and in fact have done some counter vandalism training. I also oversee school projects on Simple English Wikipedia from this IP address in collaboration with SEW ambassadors and have been doing so for nine years. Looking at the blocked IP address, I do not see any record of vandalism - or any editing at all - from this address. I would be grateful to know the reason for the block and get help removing it. Thank you. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 19:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your IP is part of a pretty wide range that's been blocked. And unfortunately this sort of block is not one that we regular admins are allowed to just lift this way. What you need to do is go to WP:IPECPROXY and go through the process of getting approved for an IP block exemption. It looks like you have a pretty good track record as an editor so I think you have a pretty good chance. — Daniel Case ( talk) 20:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Thank you
Daniel Case (
talk. Yes, I had us exempted from this block a few years ago via Simple English Wikipedia. Thanks for pointing me to the right path, it is easier to understand on that property.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Daniel Case ( talk) 20:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you
Daniel Case (
talk. Yes, I had us exempted from this block a few years ago via Simple English Wikipedia. Thanks for pointing me to the right path, it is easier to understand on that property.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 20:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Oughtta Be Otters,
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 ( talk) 15:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Oughtta Be Otters,
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 ( talk) 16:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Oughtta Be Otters
Thank you for creating Yuriko Kimura.
User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Once you get to 25 non-deleted articles, you self-nominate for the autopatrolled right.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ I dream of horses: thank you, I will keep that in mind! Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 21:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi! Thanks for creating the page on Sarah Haoda Todd, and for reaching out. After some thought I've changed the tags on the article. If I were to make one suggestion for improving the article, it would be to avoid flowery language and editorializing. For instance:
- "On December 14, 2012 their dream was realized with the formal launch of the Indigenous Business Council"
- "Haoda Todd recalls that she had to figure out many of the ins and outs of running a business as she got started. Many times she wanted to give up."
- "Haoda Todd has maintained an active and engaged civic life. Clearly, she has cultivated a voice of moral authority in her community."
Again, thank you for the work you've put into the article. – Ploni ( talk) 16:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in July 2022!
Running from July 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women and the environment. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works during the event period (with an emphasis on environmental links and topics). GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 13:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn ( talk) 23 September 2022
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Oughtta Be Otters! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Oughtta Be Otters ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 64.62.148.241. The IP range on our primary internet link is: 64.62.148.194 through 64.62.148.254; The IP range on our backup internet link is: 64.60.251.82 through 64.60.251.86. I am a frequent editor and in fact have done some counter vandalism training. I also oversee school projects on Simple English Wikipedia from this IP address in collaboration with SEW ambassadors and have been doing so for nine years. Looking at the blocked IP address, I do not see any record of vandalism - or any editing at all - from this address.
Last year I was also caught in this broad IP Range block and it seems that my exemption has expried.
I will go to WP:IPECPROXY and go through the process of getting approved for an IP block exemption, but since I can only post when at home, I thought I would start by checking here.
Thank you. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 13:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I have renewed your IP exemption for another year. Welcome back. PhilKnight ( talk) 18:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 13:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Oughtta Be Otters
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Angela Jackson (disambiguation), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
* Pppery * it has begun... 01:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @ Pppery: - thanks, I was not sure. I have a question, however: In the course of checking what was on Wikipedia about each of the two Angela Jacksons in question, I discovered there is another Angela Jackson who was referredto on a number of pages, so I am drafting a page for her, as well (she is a women's basketball coach, although -- in the course of researching her -- I came across a *fourth* Angela Jackson and am considering putting a page together for her, as well (another basketball coach, but of men's teams).
- So, if there are about to be 3-4 Angela Jacksons with pages, I am wondering if I should keep the disambiguation page? Or are the hatnotes that I made enough and should I just add more at the top of each page?
- I will admit that part of my thinking is that Angela Jackson is a very common name, and I suspect that there are actually quite a number of notable individuals by the name out there.
- So, I might have jumped the gun on making the disambiguation page...but not sure if it might not be necessary fairly soon?
- Thank you
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 04:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, with 3-4 entries listed then a disambiguation page becomes useful. The commonness of the name does not matter, only the number of people actually listed on the disambiguation page. And there's no need to try to predict the future by trying to keep the disambiguation page before adding more entries.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 05:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @
Pppery: OK, I'll post the page I was drafting today and add the third individual to the disambiguation page. It is already significantly longer than Women in Red's recommended starter page. Then, as I understand it, I should change the hatnote to a disambiguation link.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yep. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @
Pppery: OK, I'll post the page I was drafting today and add the third individual to the disambiguation page. It is already significantly longer than Women in Red's recommended starter page. Then, as I understand it, I should change the hatnote to a disambiguation link.
Oughtta Be Otters (
talk) 05:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, with 3-4 entries listed then a disambiguation page becomes useful. The commonness of the name does not matter, only the number of people actually listed on the disambiguation page. And there's no need to try to predict the future by trying to keep the disambiguation page before adding more entries.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 05:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Oughtta Be Otters:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome Oughtta Be Otters!
I'm Jeffrey (Wiki Ed), one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the
3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
Jeffrey (Wiki Ed) (
talk) 15:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking for a period of 2 years. If you still need an IP block exemption after it expires please file a new request. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. DatGuy Talk Contribs 10:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am so grateful! It helps to be able to participate in my WikiScholars course while at work, as well as teaching my students editing skills when needed. Thank you. Oughtta Be Otters ( talk) 14:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 25 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iona Allen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iona Allen, "the only one to ever make a perfect pair of boots", constructed the pair worn by Neil Armstrong on the Moon out of thirteen layers of precisely fabricated material? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iona Allen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Iona Allen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 14,801 views (616.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2024 – nice work! |
GalliumBot ( talk • contribs) (he/ it) 03:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)