This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
I was looking at Centre for Education in Mathematics and Computing, an article which exclusively uses primary sources (and probably needs to be completely rewritten). I tried to perform a search through several pages of Google for this org. I found one probably SIGCOV source. I found several others though I do not think any can be counted toward GNG due to likely being self-published (first) or the coverage not being significant (the rest). I also think I can safely exclude this one as it's just a listing of competitions (which would fall under "products" if it is significant). Given the organization's history and assuming the sources don't qualify, would a {{ Notability}} tag be good on this page? I'm not confident starting an AfD for it because I am unsure if there are pre-Internet sources for it. ~ UN6892 t c 18:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Hello Novem! Could you please delete some copyright revisions from the World's Best (film) article? Thanks! 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 10:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
First time ever trying to nominate something for deletion so I was bound to mess it up. Thanks for the assist! DontKnowWhyIBother ( talk) 21:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
...that you'll be at Wikimania, too. Would be a pleasure to chat with you at some point, perhaps catch a refreshing beverage. Bring an umbrella; if you don't need it for the rain, you'll need it for the sun. See you there. Risker ( talk) 02:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I am messaging you because the thread in Template talk:Wikisource became too long to notify you. In the testcase, I have written code for merging Template:Wikisourcehas, Template:Wikisourcelang and Template:Wikisource-multi. It works fine and you can try it too. I think these four templates should be merged by the code in testcase. If you want to know about the parameters, please let me know. Sarangem ( talk) 13:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae, I'm posting here because you're listed as a recently active administrator. There's an active discussion at WP:ERRORS about the ethics of running a hook mentioning an online suicide forum – the Main Page has just changed over to display the hook, but the discussion hasn't reached a consensus yet despite quite a few editors expressing concern. Would you be willing to intervene and pull the hook until discussion can conclude? – Tera tix ₵ 00:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you for creating tools. I have used a GA promotion tool and an editor highlighter recently and they are great. I am sorry that I was an oppose at your RFA. I opposed because it is a lifetime appointment I am always concerned about the protection of content and content creators. I have always believed that an administrator would be more likely to protect both if they were a prolific content creator. In any event the administrator corps needs variety and you are probably a good addition. I hope you might also check my patrol log to see that I am doing well with that tool. Happy editing and thanks for your contributions to this great project. Lightburst ( talk) 16:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I'm the inverse of an expert when it comes to scripts. I've tried several approaches to troubleshooting the failure for the tool to load on Talk:Harold Kushner/GA1, including checking for the necessary templates, disabling and reenabling the tool, clearing cookies, and even swapping my editing from the 2010 skin to 2022 Vector (yes, I know that doesn't mean anything, but it made me feel better knowing that didn't work either). Do you mind taking a look at that review page and seeing what I'm doing wrong for the tool to not load? It worked just fine for me on another review I wrapped up a few days ago, so I must admit I'm befuddled.
Thank you for making this and other wonderful scripts; even if I can't use them to their full potential, it's wonderful to see what is done with them by the editors that know what they're doing! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 19:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
What do you think of the conversation at the NPP page? It is forking into one largely about my own editing style. I have had that previous egregious interaction with Scope Creep, and I witnessed them also targeting innumerous articles by Another Believer in an aggressive manner. Can you act on this? From my experiences, reaching out on AN/I always leads to the same sort of drama between editors we're witnessing on the NPP talk page, with no results. ɱ (talk) 16:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
You can read my complaints about the prior actions here, here, and finally where it was condemned and resolved here. ɱ (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
My recent plea to just be kind and ask nicely went unanswered, and now was removed. ɱ (talk) 17:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Novem! I was reading
Wikipedia:Tags and it doesn't give a process for requesting tag creations so I thought I'd just ask someone who can (seeing this is
usually how it's done, anyway). Would it be alright if you create a tag for
Deputy with
Special:Tags (preferrably with the tag name "Deputy")? This also means creating the
MediaWiki:Tag-Deputy page with the content [[Wikipedia:Deputy|Deputy]]
. It'd help a lot in pinpointing edits made by Deputy on Quarry (since searching by edit summary is starting to push the execution time to
over an hour). Thank you!
Chlod (
say hi!) 02:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Are you able to see the page curation tool for the recent AFC accepted article Sarvatra Technologies? Although I repeatedly reloaded the article, the toolbar is just not shown on this particular article. It is happening only on this article and I'm just curious as to why it was happening. Thilsebatti ( talk) 03:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae,
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.).
We wanted to invite you to join the study because you are both frequently active in discussions and also have a lot of experience with technical elements of Wikipedia tools. This is an ideal mix of background and we feel this study might be very relevant to your interests.
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Thank you for your consideration.
--- Jonathan at CornellNLP ( talk) 17:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae,
I noticed that an edit made in June on this page: List of suicide sites was revoked as it was a link to an external site. The link in question was a link to a page for global support lines for people feeling suicidal. https://www.suicidestop.com/call_a_hotline.html
Whilst I can see the page does link to the Wiki page for crisis support, at a point of crisis, it's important to make help as accessible as possible. Wikipedia guidelines do say that external links are permissible in certain circumstances. Could an exception be made in this instance?
Seema 77.101.61.53 ( talk) 09:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
You do know the bot is going to re-alphabetise this next time it runs the page, yes? Primefac ( talk) 12:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you revoke this IP's talk page access since i know that IP is an LTA. Notrealname1234 ( talk) 16:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this, I of course agree that the NPP tutorial needs guidance on draftification. The reason I removed the section was not to remove that guidance, but to try and integrate it with the preceding section on deletion. Or more specifically, to present draftification alongside other WP:ATDs, because that is ultimately what it is and where it has the strongest policy basis.
I like your rewritten section on draftification, but I still feel like there is something to be said for presenting all the ATDs together. I've observed that newer NPPers tend to lean heavily on draftification while overlooking other, less controversial ATDs. I wondered if that was because it was given so much greater prominence in the tutorial (and that damn flowchart). What do you think about an "Alternatives to deletion" section, instead of a "Draftification" section specifically?
In any case thanks for your help trimming the fat from that page. It's been something I've been wanted to do for ages. – Joe ( talk) 09:08, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello - Around 3 weeks ago, I qualified and received NPP rights. However, once I started to get into reviewing, I discovered I simply do not find it fun. Maybe I may re-apply at a later date, but since NPP is a high-risk permission in event of an account breach, I would like to let go of my NPP permissions. Thanks, Ca talk to me! 22:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem, there are problem of installation of Stubsort and Hotdefaultsort in my subpages, can you check and fix those problems ? Citadeol (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
importScript('User:SD0001/StubSorter.js'); // Backlink: [[User:SD0001/StubSorter.js]]
or similar.Hello Novem Linguae,
Backlog update: At the time of writing, there are 10,800 articles and 14,900 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October Backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October is starting soon! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not uninstalled in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can pass WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations, is likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you want to get a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
I posted at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) about an issue I am having with the OneClickArchiver userscript, please see the Talk page archive button/userscript section for a more complete explanation. Hoping maybe someone around here - like maybe you? - can explain what is going wrong to me and put me out or my confused misery. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 01:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you move Draft:Siddharth Sukhlal kushwaha to mainspace. It is eligible to exist as mainspace article in its current version as it fulfills WP:NPOL. Many stub articles exist on Wikipedia. This is in good condition compared to them. Admantine123 ( talk) 09:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Please protect, Kushwaha, Kachhwaha and Kushwaha (surname) until the discussion is finished about the user on WP:AN/I Admantine123 ( talk) 09:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem, you mentioned at VPR that NPP catches redirect expansions, and I was wondering if you could provide a bit more detail. My most recent interaction with NPP saw me apparently flagged as an article creator as I had created the redirect, rather than the editor who converted the redirect to an article, but I'm unsure what NPP picked up as the redirect and expansion happened in very quick succession. Is it catching one or both, or does it run at a certain time and catch changes since that time? I have also seen redirects used for abused for block evasion similar to the report which prompted the VPR discussion, eg. here, but I was unaware NPP picked this up until now. Best, CMD ( talk) 02:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem Linguae,
I worked on the Draft:Stefan Raunser that was created by another editor. I improved it, taking in consideration the previous comments made by another wikipedia editor: DoubleGrazing, who declined the submission. Unfortunately, this reviewer does not re-review submissions that have been declined by them. I would therefore be great if you could re-review the draft and/or help me to improve the entry. Thanks in advance LA285306 LA285306 ( talk) 15:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem Linguae, Hope you are doing well. I think that you are expert in creating scripts here in Wikipedia. So, I want to inculde you in Talk:India at the 2022 Asian Games#Drop-down Issue. Please feel free to add your comments there. Thank you ! Fade258 ( talk) 10:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
You deleted my edit to gopnik article where I said how gopnik came from 'gop stop'. You said how you think it's unlikely a russian term will derive from non-russian one. What makes you think 'gop stop' is a non-russian term? The term is 100% russian. Karyev ( talk) 21:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Novem Linguae, thanks for adding the "like resume" tag to Shmuly Yanklowitz. Over the years, many IPs and more or less ephemeral accounts have been trying to promote the subject. I feel this contributions list is currently interesting, and have posted a COI template on the user's page. Bishonen | tålk 21:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC).
Hello Novem Linguae:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
For your many excellent nominations at EOTW. Your support for the project is appreciated. ― Buster7 ☎ 10:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem. I just replied you in my talk page. Sorry if arogance and overness that I showed there bothered you, it was for the bosses of yours not for you believe it. I forgot for a while that you're a volunteer user like many who are working for free in good cause, I value it. You definitely did a great job by reaching out to me. I know you saw my help seeking request somewhere in talk pages and found to to talk. I am glad for that because you put your intention and effort to find me. Yes I am at present highly depressed due to Wikipedia's harrasments to me but that's okay if I get clear direction for ahead. You may suggest me to do what will be good to me and to Wikipedia as per your understanding. I'm fine if I'm doing and I wasn't doing for long. I have no energy left to explain anything that drained my energy but I would put my best energy to do little good no matter how small.Thank you. 2409:4081:8790:B968:0:0:29EC:E8A1 ( talk) 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm curious about your objections to imprecise language for LL. For 'soft' social science topics, like the influences on group thinking, surely the kind of language in academia is imprecise. If we go all the way into the Arts then a statement like:
would be absolutely 'standard' knowledge that Wikipedia would carry as such. In the social sciences it's maybe not quite as soft but it's not precise hard science either, so academics will write stuff like
My point being that relaying scholarship can mean adopting the mode of writing about knowledge that the scholars use - 'having hallmarks' is both figurative and, if you, like 'imprecise'. Bon courage ( talk) 10:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your quiet words of advice and correction. I will bear them in mind with pleasure. Sometimes one does an incorrect thing for what appear to be entirely correct reasons at the time. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Is it possible to make DraftCleaner remove {{ AfC submission}} and {{ AfC comment}}? Lightoil ( talk) 20:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem Linguae! I thought I'd let you know that you might want to add a case for your script DraftCleaner so that it doesn't replace legitimate external links in infoboxes ( diff). No rush, of course; it's a small enough issue that it's nothing to worry about. Thanks, by the way, for making this script, as well as GANReviewTool and CiteHighlighter! — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 05:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Novem Linguae
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Creating Template:WikiProject Ghana/2023 GOIF Wikipedia Contest/Contest/entries, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 23 § Creating Template:WikiProject Ghana/2023 GOIF Wikipedia Contest/Contest/entries.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 03:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem! I came across an article that you previously G5'd in a mass deletion of a sock. The article has been recreated and I'd like to know if it's the same sock or not. Article is Boxing at the 2023 Pacific Games ― Blaze Wolf Talkblaze__wolf 17:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Would welcome some guidance on the edit. The Azores was factually the first archipeligo to be certified, it was endorsed by the Government. I edited this out to reflect just their Earthcheck certification. Its a government policy and something they publish publicly. Should I perhaps expand on it more and include their policy documents, action plans etc? Appreciate any guidance you can provide. 118.209.253.140 ( talk) 21:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
The Rescue Barnstar is awarded to editors who rescue articles from deletion. From the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron. This barnstar is awarded to Novem Linguae. Thank you for working so hard on drafts! God bless you and yours this season! Ikipedia2 ( talk) 13:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hello there, it's me again! Can you please delete the page Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination/List of users already invited. I'm trying something out; a more efficient way to add users to the list. I'll quickly let you know when it's done. ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Holidays | ||
Hello, I wanted to be the |
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Edward-Woodrow submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Buster7 ( talk) 12:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem, I hope you're well. Jupiter is being promoted to a Featured topic (having been one in the past). Does the bot work for this "re-promotion" or should I do it manually? Best – Aza24 (talk) 02:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
|action16 = FTC
|action16date = 05:12, 6 December 2023
|action16link = Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Jupiter/archive1
|action16result = promoted
|action16oldid = 1188421513
|ft2name = Jupiter
|ft2main = yes
|action6 = FTC
|action6date = 05:12, 6 December 2023
|action6link = Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Jupiter/archive1
|action6result = promoted
|action6oldid = 1187879552
|ftname = Jupiter
|ftmain = no
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrate
Christmas,
Hanukkah,
Kwanzaa,
Hogmanay,
Festivus or your hemisphere's
Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here.
Cremastra (
talk) 22:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
Cremastra ( talk) 22:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae,
I just wanted to thank you for your work on Faria Abdullah. Yours, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thanks v much for developing. I'd recommend it didn't search in the references pls? as reliable sources often use promo words. e.g. my bold "Experts say Hamas and Israel are committing war crimes in their fight" AP News. AP news is on the very reliable source list. This happens a lot and so the tool generates a lot of false positives. thanks again, Tom B ( talk) 23:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
I was looking at Centre for Education in Mathematics and Computing, an article which exclusively uses primary sources (and probably needs to be completely rewritten). I tried to perform a search through several pages of Google for this org. I found one probably SIGCOV source. I found several others though I do not think any can be counted toward GNG due to likely being self-published (first) or the coverage not being significant (the rest). I also think I can safely exclude this one as it's just a listing of competitions (which would fall under "products" if it is significant). Given the organization's history and assuming the sources don't qualify, would a {{ Notability}} tag be good on this page? I'm not confident starting an AfD for it because I am unsure if there are pre-Internet sources for it. ~ UN6892 t c 18:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Hello Novem! Could you please delete some copyright revisions from the World's Best (film) article? Thanks! 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 10:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
First time ever trying to nominate something for deletion so I was bound to mess it up. Thanks for the assist! DontKnowWhyIBother ( talk) 21:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
...that you'll be at Wikimania, too. Would be a pleasure to chat with you at some point, perhaps catch a refreshing beverage. Bring an umbrella; if you don't need it for the rain, you'll need it for the sun. See you there. Risker ( talk) 02:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I am messaging you because the thread in Template talk:Wikisource became too long to notify you. In the testcase, I have written code for merging Template:Wikisourcehas, Template:Wikisourcelang and Template:Wikisource-multi. It works fine and you can try it too. I think these four templates should be merged by the code in testcase. If you want to know about the parameters, please let me know. Sarangem ( talk) 13:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae, I'm posting here because you're listed as a recently active administrator. There's an active discussion at WP:ERRORS about the ethics of running a hook mentioning an online suicide forum – the Main Page has just changed over to display the hook, but the discussion hasn't reached a consensus yet despite quite a few editors expressing concern. Would you be willing to intervene and pull the hook until discussion can conclude? – Tera tix ₵ 00:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you for creating tools. I have used a GA promotion tool and an editor highlighter recently and they are great. I am sorry that I was an oppose at your RFA. I opposed because it is a lifetime appointment I am always concerned about the protection of content and content creators. I have always believed that an administrator would be more likely to protect both if they were a prolific content creator. In any event the administrator corps needs variety and you are probably a good addition. I hope you might also check my patrol log to see that I am doing well with that tool. Happy editing and thanks for your contributions to this great project. Lightburst ( talk) 16:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I'm the inverse of an expert when it comes to scripts. I've tried several approaches to troubleshooting the failure for the tool to load on Talk:Harold Kushner/GA1, including checking for the necessary templates, disabling and reenabling the tool, clearing cookies, and even swapping my editing from the 2010 skin to 2022 Vector (yes, I know that doesn't mean anything, but it made me feel better knowing that didn't work either). Do you mind taking a look at that review page and seeing what I'm doing wrong for the tool to not load? It worked just fine for me on another review I wrapped up a few days ago, so I must admit I'm befuddled.
Thank you for making this and other wonderful scripts; even if I can't use them to their full potential, it's wonderful to see what is done with them by the editors that know what they're doing! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 19:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
What do you think of the conversation at the NPP page? It is forking into one largely about my own editing style. I have had that previous egregious interaction with Scope Creep, and I witnessed them also targeting innumerous articles by Another Believer in an aggressive manner. Can you act on this? From my experiences, reaching out on AN/I always leads to the same sort of drama between editors we're witnessing on the NPP talk page, with no results. ɱ (talk) 16:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
You can read my complaints about the prior actions here, here, and finally where it was condemned and resolved here. ɱ (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
My recent plea to just be kind and ask nicely went unanswered, and now was removed. ɱ (talk) 17:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Novem! I was reading
Wikipedia:Tags and it doesn't give a process for requesting tag creations so I thought I'd just ask someone who can (seeing this is
usually how it's done, anyway). Would it be alright if you create a tag for
Deputy with
Special:Tags (preferrably with the tag name "Deputy")? This also means creating the
MediaWiki:Tag-Deputy page with the content [[Wikipedia:Deputy|Deputy]]
. It'd help a lot in pinpointing edits made by Deputy on Quarry (since searching by edit summary is starting to push the execution time to
over an hour). Thank you!
Chlod (
say hi!) 02:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Are you able to see the page curation tool for the recent AFC accepted article Sarvatra Technologies? Although I repeatedly reloaded the article, the toolbar is just not shown on this particular article. It is happening only on this article and I'm just curious as to why it was happening. Thilsebatti ( talk) 03:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae,
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.).
We wanted to invite you to join the study because you are both frequently active in discussions and also have a lot of experience with technical elements of Wikipedia tools. This is an ideal mix of background and we feel this study might be very relevant to your interests.
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Thank you for your consideration.
--- Jonathan at CornellNLP ( talk) 17:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae,
I noticed that an edit made in June on this page: List of suicide sites was revoked as it was a link to an external site. The link in question was a link to a page for global support lines for people feeling suicidal. https://www.suicidestop.com/call_a_hotline.html
Whilst I can see the page does link to the Wiki page for crisis support, at a point of crisis, it's important to make help as accessible as possible. Wikipedia guidelines do say that external links are permissible in certain circumstances. Could an exception be made in this instance?
Seema 77.101.61.53 ( talk) 09:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
You do know the bot is going to re-alphabetise this next time it runs the page, yes? Primefac ( talk) 12:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you revoke this IP's talk page access since i know that IP is an LTA. Notrealname1234 ( talk) 16:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this, I of course agree that the NPP tutorial needs guidance on draftification. The reason I removed the section was not to remove that guidance, but to try and integrate it with the preceding section on deletion. Or more specifically, to present draftification alongside other WP:ATDs, because that is ultimately what it is and where it has the strongest policy basis.
I like your rewritten section on draftification, but I still feel like there is something to be said for presenting all the ATDs together. I've observed that newer NPPers tend to lean heavily on draftification while overlooking other, less controversial ATDs. I wondered if that was because it was given so much greater prominence in the tutorial (and that damn flowchart). What do you think about an "Alternatives to deletion" section, instead of a "Draftification" section specifically?
In any case thanks for your help trimming the fat from that page. It's been something I've been wanted to do for ages. – Joe ( talk) 09:08, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello - Around 3 weeks ago, I qualified and received NPP rights. However, once I started to get into reviewing, I discovered I simply do not find it fun. Maybe I may re-apply at a later date, but since NPP is a high-risk permission in event of an account breach, I would like to let go of my NPP permissions. Thanks, Ca talk to me! 22:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem, there are problem of installation of Stubsort and Hotdefaultsort in my subpages, can you check and fix those problems ? Citadeol (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
importScript('User:SD0001/StubSorter.js'); // Backlink: [[User:SD0001/StubSorter.js]]
or similar.Hello Novem Linguae,
Backlog update: At the time of writing, there are 10,800 articles and 14,900 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October Backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October is starting soon! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not uninstalled in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can pass WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations, is likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you want to get a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
I posted at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) about an issue I am having with the OneClickArchiver userscript, please see the Talk page archive button/userscript section for a more complete explanation. Hoping maybe someone around here - like maybe you? - can explain what is going wrong to me and put me out or my confused misery. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 01:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you move Draft:Siddharth Sukhlal kushwaha to mainspace. It is eligible to exist as mainspace article in its current version as it fulfills WP:NPOL. Many stub articles exist on Wikipedia. This is in good condition compared to them. Admantine123 ( talk) 09:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Please protect, Kushwaha, Kachhwaha and Kushwaha (surname) until the discussion is finished about the user on WP:AN/I Admantine123 ( talk) 09:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem, you mentioned at VPR that NPP catches redirect expansions, and I was wondering if you could provide a bit more detail. My most recent interaction with NPP saw me apparently flagged as an article creator as I had created the redirect, rather than the editor who converted the redirect to an article, but I'm unsure what NPP picked up as the redirect and expansion happened in very quick succession. Is it catching one or both, or does it run at a certain time and catch changes since that time? I have also seen redirects used for abused for block evasion similar to the report which prompted the VPR discussion, eg. here, but I was unaware NPP picked this up until now. Best, CMD ( talk) 02:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem Linguae,
I worked on the Draft:Stefan Raunser that was created by another editor. I improved it, taking in consideration the previous comments made by another wikipedia editor: DoubleGrazing, who declined the submission. Unfortunately, this reviewer does not re-review submissions that have been declined by them. I would therefore be great if you could re-review the draft and/or help me to improve the entry. Thanks in advance LA285306 LA285306 ( talk) 15:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem Linguae, Hope you are doing well. I think that you are expert in creating scripts here in Wikipedia. So, I want to inculde you in Talk:India at the 2022 Asian Games#Drop-down Issue. Please feel free to add your comments there. Thank you ! Fade258 ( talk) 10:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
You deleted my edit to gopnik article where I said how gopnik came from 'gop stop'. You said how you think it's unlikely a russian term will derive from non-russian one. What makes you think 'gop stop' is a non-russian term? The term is 100% russian. Karyev ( talk) 21:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Novem Linguae, thanks for adding the "like resume" tag to Shmuly Yanklowitz. Over the years, many IPs and more or less ephemeral accounts have been trying to promote the subject. I feel this contributions list is currently interesting, and have posted a COI template on the user's page. Bishonen | tålk 21:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC).
Hello Novem Linguae:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
For your many excellent nominations at EOTW. Your support for the project is appreciated. ― Buster7 ☎ 10:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem. I just replied you in my talk page. Sorry if arogance and overness that I showed there bothered you, it was for the bosses of yours not for you believe it. I forgot for a while that you're a volunteer user like many who are working for free in good cause, I value it. You definitely did a great job by reaching out to me. I know you saw my help seeking request somewhere in talk pages and found to to talk. I am glad for that because you put your intention and effort to find me. Yes I am at present highly depressed due to Wikipedia's harrasments to me but that's okay if I get clear direction for ahead. You may suggest me to do what will be good to me and to Wikipedia as per your understanding. I'm fine if I'm doing and I wasn't doing for long. I have no energy left to explain anything that drained my energy but I would put my best energy to do little good no matter how small.Thank you. 2409:4081:8790:B968:0:0:29EC:E8A1 ( talk) 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm curious about your objections to imprecise language for LL. For 'soft' social science topics, like the influences on group thinking, surely the kind of language in academia is imprecise. If we go all the way into the Arts then a statement like:
would be absolutely 'standard' knowledge that Wikipedia would carry as such. In the social sciences it's maybe not quite as soft but it's not precise hard science either, so academics will write stuff like
My point being that relaying scholarship can mean adopting the mode of writing about knowledge that the scholars use - 'having hallmarks' is both figurative and, if you, like 'imprecise'. Bon courage ( talk) 10:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your quiet words of advice and correction. I will bear them in mind with pleasure. Sometimes one does an incorrect thing for what appear to be entirely correct reasons at the time. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Is it possible to make DraftCleaner remove {{ AfC submission}} and {{ AfC comment}}? Lightoil ( talk) 20:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem Linguae! I thought I'd let you know that you might want to add a case for your script DraftCleaner so that it doesn't replace legitimate external links in infoboxes ( diff). No rush, of course; it's a small enough issue that it's nothing to worry about. Thanks, by the way, for making this script, as well as GANReviewTool and CiteHighlighter! — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 05:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Novem Linguae
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Creating Template:WikiProject Ghana/2023 GOIF Wikipedia Contest/Contest/entries, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 23 § Creating Template:WikiProject Ghana/2023 GOIF Wikipedia Contest/Contest/entries.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 03:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Novem :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem! I came across an article that you previously G5'd in a mass deletion of a sock. The article has been recreated and I'd like to know if it's the same sock or not. Article is Boxing at the 2023 Pacific Games ― Blaze Wolf Talkblaze__wolf 17:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Would welcome some guidance on the edit. The Azores was factually the first archipeligo to be certified, it was endorsed by the Government. I edited this out to reflect just their Earthcheck certification. Its a government policy and something they publish publicly. Should I perhaps expand on it more and include their policy documents, action plans etc? Appreciate any guidance you can provide. 118.209.253.140 ( talk) 21:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
The Rescue Barnstar is awarded to editors who rescue articles from deletion. From the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron. This barnstar is awarded to Novem Linguae. Thank you for working so hard on drafts! God bless you and yours this season! Ikipedia2 ( talk) 13:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hello there, it's me again! Can you please delete the page Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination/List of users already invited. I'm trying something out; a more efficient way to add users to the list. I'll quickly let you know when it's done. ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Holidays | ||
Hello, I wanted to be the |
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Edward-Woodrow submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Buster7 ( talk) 12:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem, I hope you're well. Jupiter is being promoted to a Featured topic (having been one in the past). Does the bot work for this "re-promotion" or should I do it manually? Best – Aza24 (talk) 02:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
|action16 = FTC
|action16date = 05:12, 6 December 2023
|action16link = Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Jupiter/archive1
|action16result = promoted
|action16oldid = 1188421513
|ft2name = Jupiter
|ft2main = yes
|action6 = FTC
|action6date = 05:12, 6 December 2023
|action6link = Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Jupiter/archive1
|action6result = promoted
|action6oldid = 1187879552
|ftname = Jupiter
|ftmain = no
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrate
Christmas,
Hanukkah,
Kwanzaa,
Hogmanay,
Festivus or your hemisphere's
Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here.
Cremastra (
talk) 22:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
Cremastra ( talk) 22:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, Novem Linguae. You are receiving this notification because
you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by
the process outlined at
Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated
endearing title: | |
|
Tol Bot ( talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Novem Linguae,
I just wanted to thank you for your work on Faria Abdullah. Yours, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thanks v much for developing. I'd recommend it didn't search in the references pls? as reliable sources often use promo words. e.g. my bold "Experts say Hamas and Israel are committing war crimes in their fight" AP News. AP news is on the very reliable source list. This happens a lot and so the tool generates a lot of false positives. thanks again, Tom B ( talk) 23:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)