This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Good day, sir! Thank you for the notice of deletion regarding my article. I will improve it as much as I can. Thank you for noticing my lack of references and the notability of my article. Good day. clai ( talk) 04:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC) |
Saturday, April 5 -
WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley - You are invited! | |
---|---|
The
University of California, Berkeley's
Berkeley Center for New Media is hosting our first edit-a-thon, facilitated by WikiWoman
Sarah Stierch, on April 5! This event, focused on engaging women to contribute to Wikipedia, will feature a brief Wikipedia policy and tips overview, followed by a fast-paced energetic edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend.
Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history! The event is April 5, from 1-5 PM, at the Berkeley Center for New Media Commons at Moffitt Library. You must RSVP here - see you there! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC) |
Hello Ironholds, Please do not delete this entry. I have removed the word proposed. This legislation has taken an important step in a huge issue. It represents a bi-partisan compromise merging several others pieces into one that will now move forward. It was voted out of committee; while the text is still "young", it is bi-partisan language that has been worked on over the past year.
I will continue to follow its actions & movement, and press, until it is ready for presidential signature. THanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yhtak2014 ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
I was tempted to send you the copyedit barnstar, but that might not be appropriate, so here's a beer instead! Nettrom ( talk) 18:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for the barnstar! Karrattul ( talk) 13:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi sir from last two days am trying to create a page of our radio fm named Malayali FM... internet radio station working from USA but many times the page got deleted basically dont know the reason they telling about copyright reasons but we hav all copyrights please help on this..thank you liju Lijuvj19 ( talk) 06:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for flagging the entry on Mihku Paul as not-neutral in tone. I have tried to clean up the language, adding an additional scholarly reference, and wonder if you'd be willing to take another look. Ssenier ( talk) 15:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
@ Ironholds: Hi, I see from the tea house that you have an interest in improving Dependency injection? Galhalee ( talk) 13:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for signing up for the WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon at Berkeley that is happening today. I look forward to seeing you! We have changed the on-campus venue due to the response we've had, via Wikipedia and Facebook. Please take a look at the event page. If you get this message too late, we'll have a sign on the door of the former location directing you to the new one, which is only a short walk. See you then! SarahStierch ( talk) 15:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Sir, Thanks for reviewing my page Maa Markama Temple. Hpsatapathy ( talk) 01:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for the review. Hpsatapathy ( talk) 01:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC) |
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Law for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 03:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:Ggg2251 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Whpq ( talk) 15:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
I was in hurry today, so I had thought of fixing URLs and create talk pages afterwards, only this page was left. I have fixed references now, check Kidnapping in the United Kingdom. OccultZone ( Talk) 18:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't know where to say my it, but I still want to say... you're welcome! I appreciate your gratitude! :) 001Jrm ( talk) 03:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For all your work, as documented at User:Ironholds/CP. Bearian ( talk) 15:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Ironholds, it's me again :) I just finished a new article, can you help me to check my grammars? I've tried better this time, and i also use some English references, i hope it will be much easier to check than the last Sanghyang Adi Buddha. Sorry for bother you :( but thank you very much for your attention :) My best regards Okkisafire ( talk) 09:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, hope you're well. Thanks for creating the page about William Sharp McKechnie a few months ago. :)
Interestingly, a counsel in Somerset v Stewart, William Davy SL, isn't on wiki yet, and I was wondering if you thought that he was worthy of notice. wikisource has 'Davy, William (d.1780) (DNB00)' , and I wonder if this will suffice to be copied wholesale.
Best, 66.225.161.37 ( talk) 06:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds,
I noticed you flagged the Louise Noun article for peacocking back in March of this year. I have rewritten most of the article to try to avoid this, but I'm still a little new to Wikipedia so I wasn't sure if I was able to remove the tag. If possible, could you take a look at the page and see if there is still evidence of peacocking? Any help would be much appreciated!
UIKaren ( talk) 19:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
After making a complaint at AnI that I was being harassed, I voluntarily agreed to seek an editor review of my contributions to Wikipedia a month ago. The review has been lengthy but now seems to have ground to a halt and I would like it to be closed, a request I made to Casliber here. He was involved in the review and we are looking for an uninvolved person to make a concluding statement and wind up the review.
So why I am approaching you? Well, you are a respected member of the Wikipedia community, are a content creator and are interested in the law and wildlife. I view the role of closing my review as one where the evidence is evaluated and a conclusion is reached. To this end, I created a section in the review called "Examining the evidence" where I attempted to sum up what had been stated during the review. One person (Fram) disputed one of my statements but otherwise nobody else has queried them. Would you be prepared to close the review? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi im new here can you tell me about writing articles on my talk page. please. thanks.
Ltrzeciak12 (
talk) 12:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey Mr. Keyes, I have a question and I don't know anybody else who might be able to answer. Is there a tool that would allow us to see articles which appear in a high number of different language Wikipedias, but not here on English Wikipedia? I just realized that there is no English version of the article about Polandball, and it got me thinking that maybe there are other topics out there which have articles in, like, twenty different languages but not in English. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 10:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I personally do not understand what the tag tries to say by please provide third party references while the notability tag say please provide secondary sources. Which ones should I provide? Plus, I think the user who placed the tag did it in error, like, don't we need to mention why they are notable? I relied on journals since the academics don't appear anywhere but there. And since when did the journals become sources that are too closely associated with the subject?-- Mishae ( talk) 22:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
meetings? Ironholds ( talk) 16:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
that's better. I'm still wary about the sheer size of the article, though; frankly I don't think there's inclusion-worthy information that would cover more than the lead paragraph. Extensive documentation of every paper he's ever written is unnecessary. Ironholds ( talk) 10:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
My tool bar is not showing Hison Here ( talk) 08:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, hope you are well. Thanks for your support in adding William Sharp McKechnie and William Davy (lawyer).
Do you think Charles Pinney see DNB00 entry is worthy? He was tried for failure to act in the Bristol Riots of 1831, and an interesting record exists in State Trials (New Series) vol 3.
Cheers!
66.185.200.1 ( talk) 16:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
see page on Fursey. 66.185.200.1 ( talk) 16:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Is there any chance that you could look over at least the part of the above article that deals with him being an English barrister? Since you seem to be the go to guy on historical usages of his era, I would mention that I am a bit worried about him receiving a patent of precedence, as opposed to becoming Q.C. other ways. I'd like the usage to be proper. Many thanks.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 14:14, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Jim Carter ( talk) 19:21, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Jim Carter ( talk) 07:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
FYI. I think this is actually a really good idea because getting practical usage and feedback on features from experienced editors before wide deployment was relatively well-executed back during the Curation Tool rollout, and has been missing IMHO from some recent feature development projects since then. VQuakr ( talk) 04:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, hope you are well. Thanks for your support to add William Sharp McKechnie and William Davy (lawyer)!
Do you think Charles Pinney (see DNB00 entry) is worthy? He was the Mayor of Bristol, and tried for failure to act in the Bristol Riots of 1831. An interesting record exists in State Trials (New Series) vol 3.
Cheers! 66.185.200.1 ( talk) 13:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi again Ironholds. Sorry to add to your workload, but do you think you might add a wiki for the Habeas Corpus Act 1816?
See here. As I understand it, the measure prevented penal ships and extraterritoriality such as that later used by the Americans in Guantanamo Bay.
Thanks much. 66.185.200.1 ( talk) 13:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
if they look interesting, sure! Ironholds ( talk) 04:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Someone suggested at the Village Pump that I boldly create Wikipedia:Extant Organizations/Noticeboard, a noticeboard to discuss articles about organizations that may be subject to non-neutral editing. Basically it's the corporate version of BLPN, where both adverts and attack pages can be brought to the community for broader scrutiny. Except this board does not currently relate to a specific policy like BLPN does, except NPOV, V, etc. (though it could refer to this essay I wrote or something). I noticed you participated in the prior village pump discussion that led to consensus for Template:COI editnotice, which is now widely used. Although this noticeboard is not COI-related, I thought you might have an interest in this as well, in whether the noticeboard should be kept and/or in participating in it generally. CorporateM ( Talk) 18:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Last August you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 21:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Could you please re-instate my rollback responsibilities? I don't know if you even remember, but about 2 years ago you removed them after I made a revert and referred to it as vandalism. I got the message and made apologies etc., and you invited me to re-apply for rollback the very next day. I just got around to doing that because I want to get back into anti-vandalism and half the scripts won't work without the rollback feature. I've been a Wikipedian going on eight years now, I've been working in account creation and trusted with personal information, so I hope you can find your way to trust me with rollback responsibilities. I promise that I won't make such an error again. Seriously. I've already pledged not even to use it unless I'm on vandal patrol anyway. Please? -- Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 22:12, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your comments Re:Rollbacker on my behalf. I really appreciate it. You Rock! Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC) |
Hi, I haven't talked to you for a long time, but now I need you the most. You see, one of the users in The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones article re inserted http parameters for archives, which the consensus have voted against of using per internet protocol. The discussion, which is more then couple of months old, I can't find, and in case of edit war I need to provide him it. I clearly remember that it was this year and that it was somewhere in April, but I didn't made a comment so it didn't saved. I also remember that the discussion was about whether we as Wikipedians should use http or https on sites like YouTube and Web Archive, and the result was that http parameters should go because the site will still direct you to either one. Can you help me find this discussion? I'm thanking you in advance.-- Mishae ( talk) 17:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
For a while, I was archiving refs, but only now realized that I also need to add deadurl parameter to them. However, I don't see much change in the articles, which makes me wonder if its a good tool to use or not? If it is, what does it do? P.S. I have read the template:Cite web description of it, and I am still confused. nWould like you to elaborate on it. Thanks.-- Mishae ( talk) 14:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, its me again. I'm now in an edit war with an anonymous user. He partially revers my edits because he thinks that The Huffington Post is an RS and my spacing removals. I already edited three times and I even opened a discussion on the article's talkpage. I also, put a message on his talkpage with no response. As an editor who knows me for a long time here, can you please intervene! Like, I am feeling that I might get blocked. :( Here is his talkpage: User talk:109.76.254.114-- Mishae ( talk) 03:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
I saw in the review log you deleted quite a bit from the National Alliance on Mental Illness page suggesting it was spam. While I agree the page wasn't very good, I'd hate for my work to be deleted a year later. I'm a volunteer at NAMI, but I hate how hard it is to find any serious info about the organization itself so I wanted to help fix that. Could you take a quick look at the page and edits I've made to determine if they're wikipedia appropriate? I was just trying to make a good wikipage, but now am starting to question if someone else might view it as spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domdom8D ( talk • contribs) 22:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads ( talk) 21:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helen Calcutt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, we have not talked in about a month! So, I was wondering if you can check the above article's synopsis for cohesion and/or tone. I talked to another editor and he said that its fine, but I am just seeking a second opinion from an experienced copy editor (not that the other user was not). P.S. I'm surprised that neither you or the other user (OccultZone) are members of the Guild of Copy Editors team? It doesn't mean that I will trust someone less though, but it will be an honor if you will have a will to put your name on a list. Like, you deserve no less then anyone else.-- Mishae ( talk) 19:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, very interesting presentation! WRT to mobile feedback, the mobile team is not really providing easy feedback channels.
Frankly, the mobile team just doesn't give a shit about feedback, or about editors. -- Atlasowa ( talk) 16:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! TerryAlex ( talk) 13:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I need your opinion in regard to this discussion. Will you be kind to join? P.S. I already mention you there, and you seem to ignore it.-- Mishae ( talk) 01:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, do you have any material on Hugh Macmillan, Baron Macmillan? A list of cases like Denning's might be useful too. Cheers! 66.186.86.24 ( talk) 13:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, I notice that no page exists for Henry St Clair Feilden, author of the 1882 work "A short constitutional history of England". It might be interesting to note him in wiki for posterity. Do you have any reference material on him? 66.186.93.25 ( talk) 15:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
What's your opinion on using query based archiving? I have seen it on Tokyo ESP and decided to do the same with Chili Davis. Is it O.K. to do it? Like, I don't see it being practiced a lot which indicates it became obsolete. Plus, there was no discussion on the template's talkpage as of November 2013: {{ Query web archive}}.-- Mishae ( talk) 14:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
You are invited! →
Litquake Edit-a-thon → See you there! | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Edit-a-thon will occur in parallel with Litquake, the San Francisco Bay Area's annual literature festival. Writers from all over the Bay Area and the world will be in town during the nine day festival, so the timing is just right for us to meetup and create/translate/expand/improve articles about literature and writers. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. This event will include new editor training. RSVP →here←. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 03:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC) |
I give up. I really don't get it. I don't think I've ever seen an AN/I discussion be closed, re-opened, and rushed to be re-closed again in my life. This seriously makes me ill. Dusti *Let's talk!* 03:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, can you copy edit this article for me: Columbine High School protests. Note: the article was proposed for deletion because of three Denver Post refs at the time which implied on WP not news. I removed it, and expanded a bit, but I still need your help in making the article coherent. I hope nobody will object to the current version of the article with 2 refs from The Guardian and many other local to Denver news channels and newspapers.-- Mishae ( talk) 05:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Ironholds. I hope the City on the Bay is treating you well. You helped me a couple of years back by referring me to someone who was active in GA review. I have three newly nominated GAs (Catie Ball, Tracy Caulkins, Nicole Haislett) that are relatively clean and should require only a moderate amount of work to comply and be promoted. All three subjects are American swimmers who were Olympic gold medalists, so there also should be a certain commonality of subject matter and regarding potential GA comments. Know anyone who might be interested in taking on this little package-deal project? Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 06:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
yeah, that was a consideration; I don't know if I'm going to do a PhD (I seem to be publishing enough without one), but I'd like to be able to without relocating several thousand miles. Ironholds ( talk) 17:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Trial of Thomas Paine at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 18:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
On 20 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trial of Thomas Paine, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after his speech in the trial of Thomas Paine, a crowd unhitched Thomas Erskine's horses and pulled his carriage home? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trial of Thomas Paine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 02:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Ironholds, after your (legitimate) revert I added a source and a citation. What's the problem with them? Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 14:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Since you know some foundation people, is it possible you know a human being with a subscription to the SF Chronicle? I'm trying to find 2 articles in their archives but they don't appear to syndicate them to Highbeam/Questia/whatever (I may be wrong about that) however subscribers can access archived articles for free. In a semi-ironic turn of events I know someone who has the November 1991 issue of Analog in their basement but not (yet) anyone who subscribes to the paper of record in a major US metropolitan area. Protonk ( talk) 22:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello!
I was directed to you with my request. Could you write, or at least start the article United States v. Nathan Rehlander?
Thank you for your rapt attention.
74.78.70.130 ( talk) 19:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
It's been bugging me; relevant topic, but low mobile views:
I'd feel more comfortable if I knew whether it was legit or not. Serendi pod ous 22:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, would you please consider running for arbcom?
Pros:
Cons:
You would only have roughly 48 hours to submit a candidacy at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2014/Candidates, although all you need is a basic statement, you can refine your candidacy later through all the questions and nonsense.
Thank you for your considerations! -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 23:51, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
But you asked at the GA review... Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/William of Wrotham and heading towards FAC after that. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:10, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trial of Thomas Paine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman ( talk) 01:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Trial of Thomas Paine you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Trial of Thomas Paine for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman ( talk) 16:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Trial of Thomas Paine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trial of Thomas Paine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman ( talk) 17:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
I am sorry that you feel that way. I have no intention of improving search engine rankings. I think adding that link is very relevant and will help new R users find their way around R quickly. I dont feel think is spamming. If you change your mind, let me know. Otherwise I have no problem not adding that piece of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selva.prabhakaran ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
If you are well versed in R programming, I will consider the debate on relevancy of the site. I will then value your opinion more. If there was a wiki policy to not add references to one's site, I apologise and I will respect it. You did mention search engine rankings on my usertalk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.23.217.109 ( talk) 17:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I have just written an article but was informed that I copy pasted the whole content from another site. Can you help me with close paraphrasing thing? I substituted the tag with {{ Under construction}} so that no one will delete it in a week. Many thanks in advance.-- Mishae ( talk) 07:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. This is a courtesy message to inform you that the autopatrolled right you accorded to this user has been removed. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 12:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy Holidays... | |
and may the coming year bring peaceful melody accompanied by joyous harmony. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 19:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. - Ealdgyth - Talk 15:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC) |
Ironholds,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Serendi
pod
ous 15:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
What I meant was that it wasn't by itself reason for "actual" speedy deletion, i.e. without the time delay for "speedy" deletions such as {{ orfud}}. This is basically an orfud situation — were it completely orphaned, rather than being used solely on a non-mainspace page, it wouldn't be deleted without a few days' wait, so its presence on another page didn't particularly seem relevant. I understand your point about the potential conflict of interest, but again, I don't see that as being relevant to criterion F7 or to any other criterion; it's not blatant enough for G11, I don't see any other criterion that would even come close to being relevant, and it's definitely not a situation for IAR. Nyttend ( talk) 19:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William of Wrotham/archive1 Ealdgyth - Talk 19:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:KnowledgeGraph.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
January 25 - Pollard Memorial Library and UMass Lowell Library Edit-a-Thon #2 - You're invited | |
---|---|
Yours, -- LibraryGurl ( talk) 18:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC) |
Military history reviewers' award | ||
For completing 1 review during October–December 2014, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Military history reviewers' award. Cheers,
Peacemaker67 (
crack... thump) 23:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Good day, sir! Thank you for the notice of deletion regarding my article. I will improve it as much as I can. Thank you for noticing my lack of references and the notability of my article. Good day. clai ( talk) 04:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC) |
Saturday, April 5 -
WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley - You are invited! | |
---|---|
The
University of California, Berkeley's
Berkeley Center for New Media is hosting our first edit-a-thon, facilitated by WikiWoman
Sarah Stierch, on April 5! This event, focused on engaging women to contribute to Wikipedia, will feature a brief Wikipedia policy and tips overview, followed by a fast-paced energetic edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend.
Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history! The event is April 5, from 1-5 PM, at the Berkeley Center for New Media Commons at Moffitt Library. You must RSVP here - see you there! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC) |
Hello Ironholds, Please do not delete this entry. I have removed the word proposed. This legislation has taken an important step in a huge issue. It represents a bi-partisan compromise merging several others pieces into one that will now move forward. It was voted out of committee; while the text is still "young", it is bi-partisan language that has been worked on over the past year.
I will continue to follow its actions & movement, and press, until it is ready for presidential signature. THanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yhtak2014 ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
I was tempted to send you the copyedit barnstar, but that might not be appropriate, so here's a beer instead! Nettrom ( talk) 18:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for the barnstar! Karrattul ( talk) 13:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi sir from last two days am trying to create a page of our radio fm named Malayali FM... internet radio station working from USA but many times the page got deleted basically dont know the reason they telling about copyright reasons but we hav all copyrights please help on this..thank you liju Lijuvj19 ( talk) 06:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for flagging the entry on Mihku Paul as not-neutral in tone. I have tried to clean up the language, adding an additional scholarly reference, and wonder if you'd be willing to take another look. Ssenier ( talk) 15:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
@ Ironholds: Hi, I see from the tea house that you have an interest in improving Dependency injection? Galhalee ( talk) 13:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for signing up for the WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon at Berkeley that is happening today. I look forward to seeing you! We have changed the on-campus venue due to the response we've had, via Wikipedia and Facebook. Please take a look at the event page. If you get this message too late, we'll have a sign on the door of the former location directing you to the new one, which is only a short walk. See you then! SarahStierch ( talk) 15:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Sir, Thanks for reviewing my page Maa Markama Temple. Hpsatapathy ( talk) 01:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for the review. Hpsatapathy ( talk) 01:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC) |
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Law for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 03:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:Ggg2251 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Whpq ( talk) 15:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
I was in hurry today, so I had thought of fixing URLs and create talk pages afterwards, only this page was left. I have fixed references now, check Kidnapping in the United Kingdom. OccultZone ( Talk) 18:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't know where to say my it, but I still want to say... you're welcome! I appreciate your gratitude! :) 001Jrm ( talk) 03:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For all your work, as documented at User:Ironholds/CP. Bearian ( talk) 15:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Ironholds, it's me again :) I just finished a new article, can you help me to check my grammars? I've tried better this time, and i also use some English references, i hope it will be much easier to check than the last Sanghyang Adi Buddha. Sorry for bother you :( but thank you very much for your attention :) My best regards Okkisafire ( talk) 09:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, hope you're well. Thanks for creating the page about William Sharp McKechnie a few months ago. :)
Interestingly, a counsel in Somerset v Stewart, William Davy SL, isn't on wiki yet, and I was wondering if you thought that he was worthy of notice. wikisource has 'Davy, William (d.1780) (DNB00)' , and I wonder if this will suffice to be copied wholesale.
Best, 66.225.161.37 ( talk) 06:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds,
I noticed you flagged the Louise Noun article for peacocking back in March of this year. I have rewritten most of the article to try to avoid this, but I'm still a little new to Wikipedia so I wasn't sure if I was able to remove the tag. If possible, could you take a look at the page and see if there is still evidence of peacocking? Any help would be much appreciated!
UIKaren ( talk) 19:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
After making a complaint at AnI that I was being harassed, I voluntarily agreed to seek an editor review of my contributions to Wikipedia a month ago. The review has been lengthy but now seems to have ground to a halt and I would like it to be closed, a request I made to Casliber here. He was involved in the review and we are looking for an uninvolved person to make a concluding statement and wind up the review.
So why I am approaching you? Well, you are a respected member of the Wikipedia community, are a content creator and are interested in the law and wildlife. I view the role of closing my review as one where the evidence is evaluated and a conclusion is reached. To this end, I created a section in the review called "Examining the evidence" where I attempted to sum up what had been stated during the review. One person (Fram) disputed one of my statements but otherwise nobody else has queried them. Would you be prepared to close the review? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi im new here can you tell me about writing articles on my talk page. please. thanks.
Ltrzeciak12 (
talk) 12:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey Mr. Keyes, I have a question and I don't know anybody else who might be able to answer. Is there a tool that would allow us to see articles which appear in a high number of different language Wikipedias, but not here on English Wikipedia? I just realized that there is no English version of the article about Polandball, and it got me thinking that maybe there are other topics out there which have articles in, like, twenty different languages but not in English. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 10:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I personally do not understand what the tag tries to say by please provide third party references while the notability tag say please provide secondary sources. Which ones should I provide? Plus, I think the user who placed the tag did it in error, like, don't we need to mention why they are notable? I relied on journals since the academics don't appear anywhere but there. And since when did the journals become sources that are too closely associated with the subject?-- Mishae ( talk) 22:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
meetings? Ironholds ( talk) 16:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
that's better. I'm still wary about the sheer size of the article, though; frankly I don't think there's inclusion-worthy information that would cover more than the lead paragraph. Extensive documentation of every paper he's ever written is unnecessary. Ironholds ( talk) 10:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
My tool bar is not showing Hison Here ( talk) 08:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, hope you are well. Thanks for your support in adding William Sharp McKechnie and William Davy (lawyer).
Do you think Charles Pinney see DNB00 entry is worthy? He was tried for failure to act in the Bristol Riots of 1831, and an interesting record exists in State Trials (New Series) vol 3.
Cheers!
66.185.200.1 ( talk) 16:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
see page on Fursey. 66.185.200.1 ( talk) 16:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Is there any chance that you could look over at least the part of the above article that deals with him being an English barrister? Since you seem to be the go to guy on historical usages of his era, I would mention that I am a bit worried about him receiving a patent of precedence, as opposed to becoming Q.C. other ways. I'd like the usage to be proper. Many thanks.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 14:14, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Jim Carter ( talk) 19:21, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Jim Carter ( talk) 07:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
FYI. I think this is actually a really good idea because getting practical usage and feedback on features from experienced editors before wide deployment was relatively well-executed back during the Curation Tool rollout, and has been missing IMHO from some recent feature development projects since then. VQuakr ( talk) 04:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, hope you are well. Thanks for your support to add William Sharp McKechnie and William Davy (lawyer)!
Do you think Charles Pinney (see DNB00 entry) is worthy? He was the Mayor of Bristol, and tried for failure to act in the Bristol Riots of 1831. An interesting record exists in State Trials (New Series) vol 3.
Cheers! 66.185.200.1 ( talk) 13:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi again Ironholds. Sorry to add to your workload, but do you think you might add a wiki for the Habeas Corpus Act 1816?
See here. As I understand it, the measure prevented penal ships and extraterritoriality such as that later used by the Americans in Guantanamo Bay.
Thanks much. 66.185.200.1 ( talk) 13:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
if they look interesting, sure! Ironholds ( talk) 04:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Someone suggested at the Village Pump that I boldly create Wikipedia:Extant Organizations/Noticeboard, a noticeboard to discuss articles about organizations that may be subject to non-neutral editing. Basically it's the corporate version of BLPN, where both adverts and attack pages can be brought to the community for broader scrutiny. Except this board does not currently relate to a specific policy like BLPN does, except NPOV, V, etc. (though it could refer to this essay I wrote or something). I noticed you participated in the prior village pump discussion that led to consensus for Template:COI editnotice, which is now widely used. Although this noticeboard is not COI-related, I thought you might have an interest in this as well, in whether the noticeboard should be kept and/or in participating in it generally. CorporateM ( Talk) 18:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Last August you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 21:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Could you please re-instate my rollback responsibilities? I don't know if you even remember, but about 2 years ago you removed them after I made a revert and referred to it as vandalism. I got the message and made apologies etc., and you invited me to re-apply for rollback the very next day. I just got around to doing that because I want to get back into anti-vandalism and half the scripts won't work without the rollback feature. I've been a Wikipedian going on eight years now, I've been working in account creation and trusted with personal information, so I hope you can find your way to trust me with rollback responsibilities. I promise that I won't make such an error again. Seriously. I've already pledged not even to use it unless I'm on vandal patrol anyway. Please? -- Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 22:12, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your comments Re:Rollbacker on my behalf. I really appreciate it. You Rock! Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC) |
Hi, I haven't talked to you for a long time, but now I need you the most. You see, one of the users in The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones article re inserted http parameters for archives, which the consensus have voted against of using per internet protocol. The discussion, which is more then couple of months old, I can't find, and in case of edit war I need to provide him it. I clearly remember that it was this year and that it was somewhere in April, but I didn't made a comment so it didn't saved. I also remember that the discussion was about whether we as Wikipedians should use http or https on sites like YouTube and Web Archive, and the result was that http parameters should go because the site will still direct you to either one. Can you help me find this discussion? I'm thanking you in advance.-- Mishae ( talk) 17:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
For a while, I was archiving refs, but only now realized that I also need to add deadurl parameter to them. However, I don't see much change in the articles, which makes me wonder if its a good tool to use or not? If it is, what does it do? P.S. I have read the template:Cite web description of it, and I am still confused. nWould like you to elaborate on it. Thanks.-- Mishae ( talk) 14:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, its me again. I'm now in an edit war with an anonymous user. He partially revers my edits because he thinks that The Huffington Post is an RS and my spacing removals. I already edited three times and I even opened a discussion on the article's talkpage. I also, put a message on his talkpage with no response. As an editor who knows me for a long time here, can you please intervene! Like, I am feeling that I might get blocked. :( Here is his talkpage: User talk:109.76.254.114-- Mishae ( talk) 03:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
I saw in the review log you deleted quite a bit from the National Alliance on Mental Illness page suggesting it was spam. While I agree the page wasn't very good, I'd hate for my work to be deleted a year later. I'm a volunteer at NAMI, but I hate how hard it is to find any serious info about the organization itself so I wanted to help fix that. Could you take a quick look at the page and edits I've made to determine if they're wikipedia appropriate? I was just trying to make a good wikipage, but now am starting to question if someone else might view it as spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domdom8D ( talk • contribs) 22:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads ( talk) 21:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helen Calcutt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, we have not talked in about a month! So, I was wondering if you can check the above article's synopsis for cohesion and/or tone. I talked to another editor and he said that its fine, but I am just seeking a second opinion from an experienced copy editor (not that the other user was not). P.S. I'm surprised that neither you or the other user (OccultZone) are members of the Guild of Copy Editors team? It doesn't mean that I will trust someone less though, but it will be an honor if you will have a will to put your name on a list. Like, you deserve no less then anyone else.-- Mishae ( talk) 19:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, very interesting presentation! WRT to mobile feedback, the mobile team is not really providing easy feedback channels.
Frankly, the mobile team just doesn't give a shit about feedback, or about editors. -- Atlasowa ( talk) 16:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! TerryAlex ( talk) 13:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I need your opinion in regard to this discussion. Will you be kind to join? P.S. I already mention you there, and you seem to ignore it.-- Mishae ( talk) 01:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, do you have any material on Hugh Macmillan, Baron Macmillan? A list of cases like Denning's might be useful too. Cheers! 66.186.86.24 ( talk) 13:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ironholds, I notice that no page exists for Henry St Clair Feilden, author of the 1882 work "A short constitutional history of England". It might be interesting to note him in wiki for posterity. Do you have any reference material on him? 66.186.93.25 ( talk) 15:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
What's your opinion on using query based archiving? I have seen it on Tokyo ESP and decided to do the same with Chili Davis. Is it O.K. to do it? Like, I don't see it being practiced a lot which indicates it became obsolete. Plus, there was no discussion on the template's talkpage as of November 2013: {{ Query web archive}}.-- Mishae ( talk) 14:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
You are invited! →
Litquake Edit-a-thon → See you there! | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Edit-a-thon will occur in parallel with Litquake, the San Francisco Bay Area's annual literature festival. Writers from all over the Bay Area and the world will be in town during the nine day festival, so the timing is just right for us to meetup and create/translate/expand/improve articles about literature and writers. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. This event will include new editor training. RSVP →here←. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 03:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC) |
I give up. I really don't get it. I don't think I've ever seen an AN/I discussion be closed, re-opened, and rushed to be re-closed again in my life. This seriously makes me ill. Dusti *Let's talk!* 03:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, can you copy edit this article for me: Columbine High School protests. Note: the article was proposed for deletion because of three Denver Post refs at the time which implied on WP not news. I removed it, and expanded a bit, but I still need your help in making the article coherent. I hope nobody will object to the current version of the article with 2 refs from The Guardian and many other local to Denver news channels and newspapers.-- Mishae ( talk) 05:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Ironholds. I hope the City on the Bay is treating you well. You helped me a couple of years back by referring me to someone who was active in GA review. I have three newly nominated GAs (Catie Ball, Tracy Caulkins, Nicole Haislett) that are relatively clean and should require only a moderate amount of work to comply and be promoted. All three subjects are American swimmers who were Olympic gold medalists, so there also should be a certain commonality of subject matter and regarding potential GA comments. Know anyone who might be interested in taking on this little package-deal project? Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 06:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
yeah, that was a consideration; I don't know if I'm going to do a PhD (I seem to be publishing enough without one), but I'd like to be able to without relocating several thousand miles. Ironholds ( talk) 17:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Trial of Thomas Paine at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 18:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
On 20 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trial of Thomas Paine, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after his speech in the trial of Thomas Paine, a crowd unhitched Thomas Erskine's horses and pulled his carriage home? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trial of Thomas Paine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 02:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Ironholds, after your (legitimate) revert I added a source and a citation. What's the problem with them? Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 14:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Since you know some foundation people, is it possible you know a human being with a subscription to the SF Chronicle? I'm trying to find 2 articles in their archives but they don't appear to syndicate them to Highbeam/Questia/whatever (I may be wrong about that) however subscribers can access archived articles for free. In a semi-ironic turn of events I know someone who has the November 1991 issue of Analog in their basement but not (yet) anyone who subscribes to the paper of record in a major US metropolitan area. Protonk ( talk) 22:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello!
I was directed to you with my request. Could you write, or at least start the article United States v. Nathan Rehlander?
Thank you for your rapt attention.
74.78.70.130 ( talk) 19:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
It's been bugging me; relevant topic, but low mobile views:
I'd feel more comfortable if I knew whether it was legit or not. Serendi pod ous 22:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, would you please consider running for arbcom?
Pros:
Cons:
You would only have roughly 48 hours to submit a candidacy at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2014/Candidates, although all you need is a basic statement, you can refine your candidacy later through all the questions and nonsense.
Thank you for your considerations! -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 23:51, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
But you asked at the GA review... Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/William of Wrotham and heading towards FAC after that. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:10, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trial of Thomas Paine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman ( talk) 01:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Trial of Thomas Paine you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Trial of Thomas Paine for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman ( talk) 16:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Trial of Thomas Paine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trial of Thomas Paine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman ( talk) 17:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
I am sorry that you feel that way. I have no intention of improving search engine rankings. I think adding that link is very relevant and will help new R users find their way around R quickly. I dont feel think is spamming. If you change your mind, let me know. Otherwise I have no problem not adding that piece of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selva.prabhakaran ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
If you are well versed in R programming, I will consider the debate on relevancy of the site. I will then value your opinion more. If there was a wiki policy to not add references to one's site, I apologise and I will respect it. You did mention search engine rankings on my usertalk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.23.217.109 ( talk) 17:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I have just written an article but was informed that I copy pasted the whole content from another site. Can you help me with close paraphrasing thing? I substituted the tag with {{ Under construction}} so that no one will delete it in a week. Many thanks in advance.-- Mishae ( talk) 07:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. This is a courtesy message to inform you that the autopatrolled right you accorded to this user has been removed. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 12:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy Holidays... | |
and may the coming year bring peaceful melody accompanied by joyous harmony. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 19:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. - Ealdgyth - Talk 15:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC) |
Ironholds,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Serendi
pod
ous 15:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
What I meant was that it wasn't by itself reason for "actual" speedy deletion, i.e. without the time delay for "speedy" deletions such as {{ orfud}}. This is basically an orfud situation — were it completely orphaned, rather than being used solely on a non-mainspace page, it wouldn't be deleted without a few days' wait, so its presence on another page didn't particularly seem relevant. I understand your point about the potential conflict of interest, but again, I don't see that as being relevant to criterion F7 or to any other criterion; it's not blatant enough for G11, I don't see any other criterion that would even come close to being relevant, and it's definitely not a situation for IAR. Nyttend ( talk) 19:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William of Wrotham/archive1 Ealdgyth - Talk 19:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:KnowledgeGraph.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
January 25 - Pollard Memorial Library and UMass Lowell Library Edit-a-Thon #2 - You're invited | |
---|---|
Yours, -- LibraryGurl ( talk) 18:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC) |
Military history reviewers' award | ||
For completing 1 review during October–December 2014, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Military history reviewers' award. Cheers,
Peacemaker67 (
crack... thump) 23:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |