Sorry, but your username is not acceptable, as it rather implies that you're here officially representing the game ' Path of Exile'. Regardless of whether this is the case, I formally ask that you post a request to have your username changed before you make any more edits.
Thanks, and I apologize for the inconvenience. DS ( talk) 21:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
PathOfExile, I have renamed you to "Iaritmioawp". This was after much consideration of your situation, I thought it worth giving you a chance. There's some conditions to giving you this chance though.
I've posted something similar on the Administator's Noticeboard. If you object to my suggestions, I'm sure we can take this back to the Administrators Noticeboard, but I doubt you'll get such a generous offer elsewhere. WormTT( talk) 11:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Law Commission logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 10:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An Imperial Affliction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Green. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
The original message was posted at WilyD's talk page
create Nyíregyháza metro thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levente 2 ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Network Aging Research may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi Iaritmioawp, thanks for helping me in guide to detect and fix mistake on my draft. If there's no mistake anymore, I'll resubmit the draft. Kingsho ( talk) 17:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Lixxx235 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Your efforts to improve Wikipedia, on-wiki as well as on IRC, have not gone unnoticed. Keep up the good work. Happy editing!
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Cheers, Thanks, L235- Talk Ping when replying 19:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
I hereby decline your invitation to be a contributing editor to Wikipedia. After experiencing how it is organised and how people operate as editors, I cannot in all good conscience engage with such. I will also not be contributing financially to Wikipedia forthwith. JoyDeValois ( talk) 01:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
You have misunderstood me in your message on my talk page, where I have replied. I actually think that you have also misunderstood the "alternatives to reverts" link that you provided. - Sitush ( talk) 00:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a " soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
That's what happened; all of it is in the logs and is indisputable. You most likely thought you were dealing with yet another clear-cut case of a new G11-deletable article getting moved out of the draft space by its creator, and you deleted it without thinking twice. You made a mistake. Not a big deal, it happens to the best of us. Time to let go. Playing the "you have less experience therefore you're wrong" card will not work here. I witnessed the entire event live from its very inception. I saw the article disappear as you deleted it. I was in the process of writing an undeletion request when it got restored, all the while having a conversation with the editor who carried out the initial move. I know exactly what occurred here, and in what sequence. If you'd like this discussion to continue, I will ask that you 1) present your version of the events in a level of detail similar to the one in my presentation, addressing the question of why you deleted the entire article and not just the problematic revisions; 2) request third-party input from any experienced editor of your choosing by pinging them from this page. I generally dislike having more than two people engaged in one conversation on my talk page, but I'm entirely prepared to allow an exception here as I believe you could benefit from it—I'd much prefer if we could just move on though. Iaritmioawp ( talk) 22:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
In regards to the speedy deletion notice you placed on the draft article ("Penal Bond") I had submitted for creation, I am the copyright holder of the piece you identified as problematic here: http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/MoralityOfPenalBonds. I did not transfer copyright when I posted my work concerning penal bonds on that site and I would now like to 'donate' my work concerning penal bonds appearing on that particular page to Wikipedia insofar as what appears on that page is mine to donate and insofar as the draft article might infringe upon it, this donation to be in line with the non-exclusive license policy outlined by Wikipedia in its policy statements. Jrp2177 ( talk) 20:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
(Note: Per wp:CANVASSING I am "non-biasedly" advertising a topic for discussion by posting a notice on the ten most recent users who commented on the page in question's talkpage and also the ten most recent users who edited the article in question.)
Commentators continue to reference/allege Card's piece involving a fictional, future Obama's coup d'état by way of urban guirillas as racist (eg see here in Slate, 2013; here, HuffPo, 2013; here, Wired, 2014). Should our article mention this aspect of controversy with regard to the piece here: " Orson Scott Card#Politics"?
(Also see a 2013 blogpost by M Aspan citing this from Card in 2000 rgding allegedly non-racist use of nigga'.)
See discussion here: Talk:Orson Scott Card#RfC: Subject of blp racist?
-- Hodgdon's secret garden ( talk) 21:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Super Granny (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gnomes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rhizobium Inoculants, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Haruth ( talk) 16:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Title says it all. You come to it intelligently and argue intelligently. I think that is what WP is about and I should award you a WP barnstar or something, but I don't know how to do that kind of thing.
But sincerely I thank you. If I disagree with you, I hope I do so from the same kinda intelligent standpoint and that is OK, I think, and I have never seen you swear or lose your temper. An asset to Wikipedia. I hope I am the same. Sometimes I am wrong and sometimes I am bizarre, User:Lenticel is also very good at this that he sees my bizarrity and then suggests something better, so I sometimes just throw something out to suggest things that other people can see in a different way from me, and together we make the encyclopaedia better.
So I say thanks once again. As it grows bigger it gets harder, dunnit?!
S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonTrew ( talk • contribs) 06:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Iaritmioawp. It seems no one notified you at the time but there was a discussion recently about a question you often ask on RfAs, here. The consensus seems to be that your question presents a false dilemma, whereby the outcome "A or B" doesn't really apply because the 'correct' answer is really option C: 'Vote by backing up opinion B'. As such I'd like to request that you either don't ask this question anymore or phrase it in such a way that option C is a possibility. 'How do you proceed?' would be a better phrasing for the last sentence. Thanks, Sam Walton ( talk) 20:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you in my case : "own talk page against abusive editor with revert rights"!
Miraclexix (
talk) 00:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Miraclexix and harassment. Thank you. Weegeerunner ( talk) 20:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Iaritmioawp, would you like to adopt me? Cheers -- Miraclexix ( talk) 12:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Why did you redirect User:I really need that username to your own talk page? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ZigZag (2015 Video Game). Since you had some involvement with the ZigZag (2015 Video Game) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi ( ✉) 10:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ZigZag (2015 Video Game). Since you had some involvement with the ZigZag (2015 Video Game) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Law Commission logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have blocked you for one week for persistent socking with IPs. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
In April, the Arbitration Committee privately warned Bbb23 that his use of the CheckUser tool had been contrary to local and global policies prohibiting checking accounts where there is insufficient evidence to suspect abusive sockpuppetry ("fishing"). The committee additionally imposed specific restrictions on Bbb23's use of the CheckUser tool in ambiguous cases otherwise considered to be within the discretion of individual CheckUsers. Bbb23 has subsequently communicated to the committee that he is unwilling to comply with these restrictions, continued to run similar questionable checks, and refused to explain these checks on request. Accordingly, Bbb23's CheckUser access is revoked.
(copied from ARBN)
It's heartening that some semblance of accountability still exists even for our "superusers." Iaritmioawp ( talk) 15:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for adding the logo to the page as requested. Appreciate it. Hope this barnstar is adequate expression of my thanks and gratitude. MaskedSinger ( talk) 03:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. —— Serial # 09:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
you need to stop doing this. Please. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Iaritmioawp - I take potential misuse of my tools very seriously, so would like to ensure you are aware that I am open to recall. My recall criteria is available at Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria. I believe I acted in good faith in an attempt to help a fellow editor who was not doing amazingly. ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 02:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Please read this if you wish to add a commentI've now received three messages from confused editors [2] [3] [4] who seem to be under the mistaken impression that I might have edited as an IP while blocked on my main account. This is not what happened. If you wish to learn what did happen, you are welcome to examine the contribution histories of both my account and my IP range (which I made public last year in the interest of transparency) and draw your own conclusions. I dislike having to delete any messages from my talk page—I get so few of them!—but it's unfortunately become necessary here to avoid giving the blocking admin the impression that s/he doesn't need to answer my question. Thank you for your understanding; I'm looking forward to hearing from you again in the future. Iaritmioawp ( talk) 11:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC) |
You appear to have continued to edit logged out despite the clear consensus of the community when you brought this question to AN that you should not do so. You also appear to be actively editing in controversies on dynamic IPs without connecting them to this account. It appears that you are still doing so actively and consistently based on a look at the range ( Special:Contributions/78.28.44.111/19) associated with the IP that led that that thread. This appears to be in violation of the sockpuppetry policy in that it is avoiding community scrutiny for your comments on threads on various noticeboards and on disputes on user talk pages.
I would like to request that you stop this in line with the community consensus on this topic from the last block review. I would also like to note for the record that the CU tool was not used at all to determine this, and that the range above was based on the IP that you publicly disclosed in this thread that I mentioned above. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1991 establishments in the Czech Republic indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, but your username is not acceptable, as it rather implies that you're here officially representing the game ' Path of Exile'. Regardless of whether this is the case, I formally ask that you post a request to have your username changed before you make any more edits.
Thanks, and I apologize for the inconvenience. DS ( talk) 21:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
PathOfExile, I have renamed you to "Iaritmioawp". This was after much consideration of your situation, I thought it worth giving you a chance. There's some conditions to giving you this chance though.
I've posted something similar on the Administator's Noticeboard. If you object to my suggestions, I'm sure we can take this back to the Administrators Noticeboard, but I doubt you'll get such a generous offer elsewhere. WormTT( talk) 11:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Law Commission logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 10:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An Imperial Affliction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Green. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
The original message was posted at WilyD's talk page
create Nyíregyháza metro thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levente 2 ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Network Aging Research may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi Iaritmioawp, thanks for helping me in guide to detect and fix mistake on my draft. If there's no mistake anymore, I'll resubmit the draft. Kingsho ( talk) 17:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Lixxx235 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Your efforts to improve Wikipedia, on-wiki as well as on IRC, have not gone unnoticed. Keep up the good work. Happy editing!
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Cheers, Thanks, L235- Talk Ping when replying 19:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
I hereby decline your invitation to be a contributing editor to Wikipedia. After experiencing how it is organised and how people operate as editors, I cannot in all good conscience engage with such. I will also not be contributing financially to Wikipedia forthwith. JoyDeValois ( talk) 01:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
You have misunderstood me in your message on my talk page, where I have replied. I actually think that you have also misunderstood the "alternatives to reverts" link that you provided. - Sitush ( talk) 00:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a " soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
That's what happened; all of it is in the logs and is indisputable. You most likely thought you were dealing with yet another clear-cut case of a new G11-deletable article getting moved out of the draft space by its creator, and you deleted it without thinking twice. You made a mistake. Not a big deal, it happens to the best of us. Time to let go. Playing the "you have less experience therefore you're wrong" card will not work here. I witnessed the entire event live from its very inception. I saw the article disappear as you deleted it. I was in the process of writing an undeletion request when it got restored, all the while having a conversation with the editor who carried out the initial move. I know exactly what occurred here, and in what sequence. If you'd like this discussion to continue, I will ask that you 1) present your version of the events in a level of detail similar to the one in my presentation, addressing the question of why you deleted the entire article and not just the problematic revisions; 2) request third-party input from any experienced editor of your choosing by pinging them from this page. I generally dislike having more than two people engaged in one conversation on my talk page, but I'm entirely prepared to allow an exception here as I believe you could benefit from it—I'd much prefer if we could just move on though. Iaritmioawp ( talk) 22:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
In regards to the speedy deletion notice you placed on the draft article ("Penal Bond") I had submitted for creation, I am the copyright holder of the piece you identified as problematic here: http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/MoralityOfPenalBonds. I did not transfer copyright when I posted my work concerning penal bonds on that site and I would now like to 'donate' my work concerning penal bonds appearing on that particular page to Wikipedia insofar as what appears on that page is mine to donate and insofar as the draft article might infringe upon it, this donation to be in line with the non-exclusive license policy outlined by Wikipedia in its policy statements. Jrp2177 ( talk) 20:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
(Note: Per wp:CANVASSING I am "non-biasedly" advertising a topic for discussion by posting a notice on the ten most recent users who commented on the page in question's talkpage and also the ten most recent users who edited the article in question.)
Commentators continue to reference/allege Card's piece involving a fictional, future Obama's coup d'état by way of urban guirillas as racist (eg see here in Slate, 2013; here, HuffPo, 2013; here, Wired, 2014). Should our article mention this aspect of controversy with regard to the piece here: " Orson Scott Card#Politics"?
(Also see a 2013 blogpost by M Aspan citing this from Card in 2000 rgding allegedly non-racist use of nigga'.)
See discussion here: Talk:Orson Scott Card#RfC: Subject of blp racist?
-- Hodgdon's secret garden ( talk) 21:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Super Granny (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gnomes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rhizobium Inoculants, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Haruth ( talk) 16:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Title says it all. You come to it intelligently and argue intelligently. I think that is what WP is about and I should award you a WP barnstar or something, but I don't know how to do that kind of thing.
But sincerely I thank you. If I disagree with you, I hope I do so from the same kinda intelligent standpoint and that is OK, I think, and I have never seen you swear or lose your temper. An asset to Wikipedia. I hope I am the same. Sometimes I am wrong and sometimes I am bizarre, User:Lenticel is also very good at this that he sees my bizarrity and then suggests something better, so I sometimes just throw something out to suggest things that other people can see in a different way from me, and together we make the encyclopaedia better.
So I say thanks once again. As it grows bigger it gets harder, dunnit?!
S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonTrew ( talk • contribs) 06:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Iaritmioawp. It seems no one notified you at the time but there was a discussion recently about a question you often ask on RfAs, here. The consensus seems to be that your question presents a false dilemma, whereby the outcome "A or B" doesn't really apply because the 'correct' answer is really option C: 'Vote by backing up opinion B'. As such I'd like to request that you either don't ask this question anymore or phrase it in such a way that option C is a possibility. 'How do you proceed?' would be a better phrasing for the last sentence. Thanks, Sam Walton ( talk) 20:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you in my case : "own talk page against abusive editor with revert rights"!
Miraclexix (
talk) 00:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Miraclexix and harassment. Thank you. Weegeerunner ( talk) 20:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Iaritmioawp, would you like to adopt me? Cheers -- Miraclexix ( talk) 12:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Why did you redirect User:I really need that username to your own talk page? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ZigZag (2015 Video Game). Since you had some involvement with the ZigZag (2015 Video Game) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi ( ✉) 10:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ZigZag (2015 Video Game). Since you had some involvement with the ZigZag (2015 Video Game) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Law Commission logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have blocked you for one week for persistent socking with IPs. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
In April, the Arbitration Committee privately warned Bbb23 that his use of the CheckUser tool had been contrary to local and global policies prohibiting checking accounts where there is insufficient evidence to suspect abusive sockpuppetry ("fishing"). The committee additionally imposed specific restrictions on Bbb23's use of the CheckUser tool in ambiguous cases otherwise considered to be within the discretion of individual CheckUsers. Bbb23 has subsequently communicated to the committee that he is unwilling to comply with these restrictions, continued to run similar questionable checks, and refused to explain these checks on request. Accordingly, Bbb23's CheckUser access is revoked.
(copied from ARBN)
It's heartening that some semblance of accountability still exists even for our "superusers." Iaritmioawp ( talk) 15:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for adding the logo to the page as requested. Appreciate it. Hope this barnstar is adequate expression of my thanks and gratitude. MaskedSinger ( talk) 03:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. —— Serial # 09:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
you need to stop doing this. Please. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Iaritmioawp - I take potential misuse of my tools very seriously, so would like to ensure you are aware that I am open to recall. My recall criteria is available at Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria. I believe I acted in good faith in an attempt to help a fellow editor who was not doing amazingly. ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 02:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Please read this if you wish to add a commentI've now received three messages from confused editors [2] [3] [4] who seem to be under the mistaken impression that I might have edited as an IP while blocked on my main account. This is not what happened. If you wish to learn what did happen, you are welcome to examine the contribution histories of both my account and my IP range (which I made public last year in the interest of transparency) and draw your own conclusions. I dislike having to delete any messages from my talk page—I get so few of them!—but it's unfortunately become necessary here to avoid giving the blocking admin the impression that s/he doesn't need to answer my question. Thank you for your understanding; I'm looking forward to hearing from you again in the future. Iaritmioawp ( talk) 11:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC) |
You appear to have continued to edit logged out despite the clear consensus of the community when you brought this question to AN that you should not do so. You also appear to be actively editing in controversies on dynamic IPs without connecting them to this account. It appears that you are still doing so actively and consistently based on a look at the range ( Special:Contributions/78.28.44.111/19) associated with the IP that led that that thread. This appears to be in violation of the sockpuppetry policy in that it is avoiding community scrutiny for your comments on threads on various noticeboards and on disputes on user talk pages.
I would like to request that you stop this in line with the community consensus on this topic from the last block review. I would also like to note for the record that the CU tool was not used at all to determine this, and that the range above was based on the IP that you publicly disclosed in this thread that I mentioned above. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1991 establishments in the Czech Republic indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)