http://freespirit1.wix.com/freespirit#!findus/c2414
--HXL's Roundtable and Record 00:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hallo HammerFilmFan,
I answered on the Libya's discussion Page. Anyway, thanks a lot for detecting two errors of mine! Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 14:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I do not believe that the picture on Susan Atkins page titled "mug shot of Atkins taken after her arrest" is a picture of Susan Atkins.I believe that the picture is of a person who portrayed Susan in issue 20 of Pop Smear magazine. The article recreated the killings in a photo journalist stle and participants were played by Maynard Keenan as Charles Manson as well as Dick Manitoba,Wayne Kramer,Arthur Kane,Texas Terri,Jeff Dahl. I notice that you had similar feelings about the pic. Can you help me with the next step please. Thanks Garwain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garwain ( talk • contribs) 18:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
http://freespirit1.wix.com/freespirit#!findus/c2414== MedCab ==
Hello, I have listed some comments on the case you have filed. You will find them on the case page. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 21:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
http://www.inlandiapress.com/index.php/2011/05/20/did-patrick-jane-really-kill-red-john-in-season-finale/. Quote by creator of the show saying he is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odoital25 ( talk • contribs) 04:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- and which we now know was either a lie, a mis-quote, or a misunderstanding - as Red John is "alive & well" in the show. HammerFilmFan ( talk) 01:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey HammerFilmFan, I saw you undid my edit over on the 2012 Aurora shooting. I'm curious why you did. I added the reference and removed the {{ citation needed}} template. Thanks. -- Luke (Talk) 17:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
If you look at the tool bar above the edit window, click cite, then the dropdown box you'll find a template for news articles, it isn't just a weblink. Guidelines say "Citations for newspaper articles typically include:: name of the newspaper in italics,date of publication, byline (author's name), if any, title of the article within quotation marks, city of publication, if not included in name of newspaper,page number(s) are optional. See WP:CTT and Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners with citation templates. I think the main thing about the foreign language sources other than we should use English sources where possible is that they didn't seem to pass our RS criteria. I'd still prefer a more mainstream publication than the Washington Times. Dougweller ( talk) 15:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Dougweller ( talk) 20:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
The Washington Post is one of the major papers of the United States, occupying a mindspace somewhat analogous to The Guardian in the United Kingdom (albeit not so far to the political left). The Washington Times is an obscure local paper, founded and owned by Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church (and whoever may be behind them), and with an editorial policy to the far-right even by U.S. standards. Do not confuse the two; and be very cautious about using anything from the Times as a source. -- Orange Mike | Talk 14:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Back Street Crawler ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Apparently the same user who was accused of archiving the conversations in the talk page, is the same one that just reverted your edition. As I read he was caught in several lies. It seems as you said that the conversation happened just a couple of months back. The dispute resolution managed the article as he wanted, mostly. I guess he tries to hide how he is in a severe conflict of interest ( Is that dispute a joke? as I read he is a trustee in the board of the Michael Servetus Institute). Can people archive a conversation that is not even 3 months old? In this case it is just biased. A clear try to hide, not protocol-- SchuhammerJes ( talk) 13:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Apparently this conflict of interest was dismissed by a dispute. But still, that does not mean the conversation has to vanish, or should be archived. It just adds more intriguing and ominous weight to the COI discussions.-- SchuhammerJes ( talk) 14:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, HammerFilmFan. I've restored the content you blanked from this talk page archive. Deleting talk page comments is allowed in only very limited circumstances. If you can explain which criterion covers your removal, I will remove the content that needs to go. If you blank, delete or alter talk page content, whether current or archived, without first discussing the matter you jeopardize your editing privilege. I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Regards Tide rolls 23:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on
User talk:Kazuba#November 2012, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it.
Especially when your
unsigned edit, coming immediately after mine, may make it seem that I did it!
(
)-
220
of
Borg 02:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
On 11 November 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Xenoceratops, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Bongwarrior ( talk) 23:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
It would not be the first time I have tried to talk some sense into him, but sadly I didn't get far. If you think that his omission of edit summaries in that case was contrary to Wikipedia policies (in addition to the obvious disregard for the edit summary manual), you should ask an uninvolved administrator for help at WP:DRN or WP:ANI or WP:AE or similar forums. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I did that with valid reason. The deleted content is the academic garbage and that was just the small part of the junkyard. The article itself represents one sided view of the scientific community whose serbocroatistic blunderviews are obsolete, proved wrong and the time has run over such notions. I am not going to engage in any edit wars since it is pointless to fight against the moderator(s) whose been paid for the talibanic assault on this article. The article now is ordinary serbocroatistic onanism, rude ignoring of the reality, rude ignoring of Croatian science and Croatian speakers. Fortunately for me, in the meantime I was informed by my community about what encyclopedic violence was done here and warned about what might happen to me if I involve myself into editing and lose my time invain hopelessly trying to explain the basic things. I saw the talk page of the article Croatian language and the reverts been done on the article and I am 100% convinced that the expelled Croatian editors were right. The form of that article as it looks now was not formed with the editors' consensus, but by the rude misuse of the tools of an admin who was desysopped in the meantime and his gang. A decade long experience of mine from the forums tells me that there is a swarm of his sockpuppets and meatpuppets that is defending this article in all possible ways, reverting, sending warnings, creating false support to his view etc. The Wikipedia in English is rapidly losing its editors, with one of the highest rates of abandoning and it is obvious why. Rikovers ( talk) 22:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
What was your reason for this removal? Tide rolls 02:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for the drama. I was just trying to edit back in the two citations you'd removed, and add in a third one.
Bearian (
talk) 00:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
[1] Which part do you take offense to? It's all properly sourced. ChakaKong talk 16:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija , you may be blocked from editing. bobrayner ( talk) 11:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
The text you removed about the "widespread" viewing of DVDs is, indeed, highly dubious. Unfortunately, apologists have a history of making even more dubious attempts to paint a positive picture of life in North Korea. Cheers, TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 09:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Lighten up. :-) HammerFilmFan ( talk) 04:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
The Republic of Cyprus does not have de facto sovereignty over the whole island; it has de jure sovereignty over the whole island (with the exception of the British bases and other British sites), but de facto sovereignty only in the south. The TRNC has de facto sovereignty in the north. I've reverted your edit. Thanks, -- Lfdder ( talk) 23:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
You may have participated in a prior informal discussion on changing the title of 2013 Russian meteor event.
This discussion has been closed in favor of a formal Requested Move.
You are invited to comment on the formal discussion here.
Thank you. μηδείς ( talk) 19:00, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't think I've ever edited either your user page or your user talk page before, and I sure I wouldn't leave a message that just said "okay".
That said, I'm glad you've recovered from your surgery. DS ( talk) 10:54, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
re: [2]. You want the talk, not the old GA1 subpage, I think... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Timur#Who was .22Kurgan.22 .3F. Peaceray ( talk) 05:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
According to the Resolved template page itself, I used it correctly: the resolution applies to the section, not to specific comments within the section; and putting it at the top can save people from wasting time reading about an already-resolved issue. And I used the blockquote in accordance with how blockquotes had been used elsewhere on that same TP (and in accordance with how they are almost universally used). Also, if you're going to correct other people's posts on TPs, you should follow the rules yourself: you didn't sign your post. AudiblySilenced ✉ 20:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm not called "Doug". See the top of my userpage. -- Dweller ( talk) 19:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
That was a good move removing the anti-Israeli remark from Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Want to now work on removing every anti-Russian remark? HiLo48 ( talk) 12:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Want to report User: HammerFilmFan. Thank you. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 12:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
The page history is a great place to look to see who leaves unsigned comments and posts.
I have added the {{
unsigned}}
template to both posts of the IP that posted the edit request and the Original research noticeboard.—
cyberpower
ChatOnline 09:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
FYI, a move of 2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa has been formally requested. I'd invite you to submit your comments. -- Natural RX 17:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure what happened, but I'm sorry that we started off this way. Looking over your editing history, I'm not seeing any prior experience with editing articles with health claims, so this could be the very first time you ever encountered a WP:MEDRS-related dispute. I see you've worked on WP:BLP-related articles, so you know that we have policies and guidelines that go beyond WP:V and WP:RS. MEDRS is similar to BLP in that it requires better quality sources than what's mentioned in V and RS. However, MEDRS is far more specific than BLP. If a MEDRS dispute is not resolved through normal editing and discussions on the article talk page, then WP:RSN is the noticeboard to turn to for assistance, though talk pages for related WikiProjects like WikiProject Medicine are often used as an intermediate step in dispute resolution. Again, sorry that our first time working together went so badly. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you .... HammerFilmFan ( talk) 18:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
FYI, User:Taivo is now User:TaivoLinguist. Their original user page has been replaced by someone from another wiki. From your comments there, it looks like you were as confused as I was. — kwami ( talk) 20:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
NO
removed rubbish
Don't post that nonsense here!
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
http://freespirit1.wix.com/freespirit#!findus/c2414
--HXL's Roundtable and Record 00:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hallo HammerFilmFan,
I answered on the Libya's discussion Page. Anyway, thanks a lot for detecting two errors of mine! Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 14:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I do not believe that the picture on Susan Atkins page titled "mug shot of Atkins taken after her arrest" is a picture of Susan Atkins.I believe that the picture is of a person who portrayed Susan in issue 20 of Pop Smear magazine. The article recreated the killings in a photo journalist stle and participants were played by Maynard Keenan as Charles Manson as well as Dick Manitoba,Wayne Kramer,Arthur Kane,Texas Terri,Jeff Dahl. I notice that you had similar feelings about the pic. Can you help me with the next step please. Thanks Garwain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garwain ( talk • contribs) 18:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
http://freespirit1.wix.com/freespirit#!findus/c2414== MedCab ==
Hello, I have listed some comments on the case you have filed. You will find them on the case page. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 21:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
http://www.inlandiapress.com/index.php/2011/05/20/did-patrick-jane-really-kill-red-john-in-season-finale/. Quote by creator of the show saying he is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odoital25 ( talk • contribs) 04:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- and which we now know was either a lie, a mis-quote, or a misunderstanding - as Red John is "alive & well" in the show. HammerFilmFan ( talk) 01:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey HammerFilmFan, I saw you undid my edit over on the 2012 Aurora shooting. I'm curious why you did. I added the reference and removed the {{ citation needed}} template. Thanks. -- Luke (Talk) 17:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
If you look at the tool bar above the edit window, click cite, then the dropdown box you'll find a template for news articles, it isn't just a weblink. Guidelines say "Citations for newspaper articles typically include:: name of the newspaper in italics,date of publication, byline (author's name), if any, title of the article within quotation marks, city of publication, if not included in name of newspaper,page number(s) are optional. See WP:CTT and Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners with citation templates. I think the main thing about the foreign language sources other than we should use English sources where possible is that they didn't seem to pass our RS criteria. I'd still prefer a more mainstream publication than the Washington Times. Dougweller ( talk) 15:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Dougweller ( talk) 20:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
The Washington Post is one of the major papers of the United States, occupying a mindspace somewhat analogous to The Guardian in the United Kingdom (albeit not so far to the political left). The Washington Times is an obscure local paper, founded and owned by Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church (and whoever may be behind them), and with an editorial policy to the far-right even by U.S. standards. Do not confuse the two; and be very cautious about using anything from the Times as a source. -- Orange Mike | Talk 14:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Back Street Crawler ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Apparently the same user who was accused of archiving the conversations in the talk page, is the same one that just reverted your edition. As I read he was caught in several lies. It seems as you said that the conversation happened just a couple of months back. The dispute resolution managed the article as he wanted, mostly. I guess he tries to hide how he is in a severe conflict of interest ( Is that dispute a joke? as I read he is a trustee in the board of the Michael Servetus Institute). Can people archive a conversation that is not even 3 months old? In this case it is just biased. A clear try to hide, not protocol-- SchuhammerJes ( talk) 13:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Apparently this conflict of interest was dismissed by a dispute. But still, that does not mean the conversation has to vanish, or should be archived. It just adds more intriguing and ominous weight to the COI discussions.-- SchuhammerJes ( talk) 14:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, HammerFilmFan. I've restored the content you blanked from this talk page archive. Deleting talk page comments is allowed in only very limited circumstances. If you can explain which criterion covers your removal, I will remove the content that needs to go. If you blank, delete or alter talk page content, whether current or archived, without first discussing the matter you jeopardize your editing privilege. I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Regards Tide rolls 23:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on
User talk:Kazuba#November 2012, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it.
Especially when your
unsigned edit, coming immediately after mine, may make it seem that I did it!
(
)-
220
of
Borg 02:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
On 11 November 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Xenoceratops, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Bongwarrior ( talk) 23:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
It would not be the first time I have tried to talk some sense into him, but sadly I didn't get far. If you think that his omission of edit summaries in that case was contrary to Wikipedia policies (in addition to the obvious disregard for the edit summary manual), you should ask an uninvolved administrator for help at WP:DRN or WP:ANI or WP:AE or similar forums. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I did that with valid reason. The deleted content is the academic garbage and that was just the small part of the junkyard. The article itself represents one sided view of the scientific community whose serbocroatistic blunderviews are obsolete, proved wrong and the time has run over such notions. I am not going to engage in any edit wars since it is pointless to fight against the moderator(s) whose been paid for the talibanic assault on this article. The article now is ordinary serbocroatistic onanism, rude ignoring of the reality, rude ignoring of Croatian science and Croatian speakers. Fortunately for me, in the meantime I was informed by my community about what encyclopedic violence was done here and warned about what might happen to me if I involve myself into editing and lose my time invain hopelessly trying to explain the basic things. I saw the talk page of the article Croatian language and the reverts been done on the article and I am 100% convinced that the expelled Croatian editors were right. The form of that article as it looks now was not formed with the editors' consensus, but by the rude misuse of the tools of an admin who was desysopped in the meantime and his gang. A decade long experience of mine from the forums tells me that there is a swarm of his sockpuppets and meatpuppets that is defending this article in all possible ways, reverting, sending warnings, creating false support to his view etc. The Wikipedia in English is rapidly losing its editors, with one of the highest rates of abandoning and it is obvious why. Rikovers ( talk) 22:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
What was your reason for this removal? Tide rolls 02:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for the drama. I was just trying to edit back in the two citations you'd removed, and add in a third one.
Bearian (
talk) 00:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
[1] Which part do you take offense to? It's all properly sourced. ChakaKong talk 16:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija , you may be blocked from editing. bobrayner ( talk) 11:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
The text you removed about the "widespread" viewing of DVDs is, indeed, highly dubious. Unfortunately, apologists have a history of making even more dubious attempts to paint a positive picture of life in North Korea. Cheers, TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 09:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Lighten up. :-) HammerFilmFan ( talk) 04:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
The Republic of Cyprus does not have de facto sovereignty over the whole island; it has de jure sovereignty over the whole island (with the exception of the British bases and other British sites), but de facto sovereignty only in the south. The TRNC has de facto sovereignty in the north. I've reverted your edit. Thanks, -- Lfdder ( talk) 23:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
You may have participated in a prior informal discussion on changing the title of 2013 Russian meteor event.
This discussion has been closed in favor of a formal Requested Move.
You are invited to comment on the formal discussion here.
Thank you. μηδείς ( talk) 19:00, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't think I've ever edited either your user page or your user talk page before, and I sure I wouldn't leave a message that just said "okay".
That said, I'm glad you've recovered from your surgery. DS ( talk) 10:54, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
re: [2]. You want the talk, not the old GA1 subpage, I think... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Timur#Who was .22Kurgan.22 .3F. Peaceray ( talk) 05:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
According to the Resolved template page itself, I used it correctly: the resolution applies to the section, not to specific comments within the section; and putting it at the top can save people from wasting time reading about an already-resolved issue. And I used the blockquote in accordance with how blockquotes had been used elsewhere on that same TP (and in accordance with how they are almost universally used). Also, if you're going to correct other people's posts on TPs, you should follow the rules yourself: you didn't sign your post. AudiblySilenced ✉ 20:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm not called "Doug". See the top of my userpage. -- Dweller ( talk) 19:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
That was a good move removing the anti-Israeli remark from Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Want to now work on removing every anti-Russian remark? HiLo48 ( talk) 12:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Want to report User: HammerFilmFan. Thank you. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 12:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
The page history is a great place to look to see who leaves unsigned comments and posts.
I have added the {{
unsigned}}
template to both posts of the IP that posted the edit request and the Original research noticeboard.—
cyberpower
ChatOnline 09:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
FYI, a move of 2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa has been formally requested. I'd invite you to submit your comments. -- Natural RX 17:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure what happened, but I'm sorry that we started off this way. Looking over your editing history, I'm not seeing any prior experience with editing articles with health claims, so this could be the very first time you ever encountered a WP:MEDRS-related dispute. I see you've worked on WP:BLP-related articles, so you know that we have policies and guidelines that go beyond WP:V and WP:RS. MEDRS is similar to BLP in that it requires better quality sources than what's mentioned in V and RS. However, MEDRS is far more specific than BLP. If a MEDRS dispute is not resolved through normal editing and discussions on the article talk page, then WP:RSN is the noticeboard to turn to for assistance, though talk pages for related WikiProjects like WikiProject Medicine are often used as an intermediate step in dispute resolution. Again, sorry that our first time working together went so badly. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you .... HammerFilmFan ( talk) 18:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
FYI, User:Taivo is now User:TaivoLinguist. Their original user page has been replaced by someone from another wiki. From your comments there, it looks like you were as confused as I was. — kwami ( talk) 20:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
NO
removed rubbish
Don't post that nonsense here!
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)