This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah ( talk) 15:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarTrek Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — fourthords | =Λ= | 21:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anya's Ghost, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coloring and Well. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Humayun Khan (soldier), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bystander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kewaunee Fabrications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. for (;;) (talk) 12:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I've nominated the article about the episode " Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?" for Featured Article consideration. I would really appreciate any comments or feedback on this nomination. I know you have done only minor edits the article, but I would greatly appreciate your input. It is completely okay if you are too busy or would not like to do this as I know this is outside of your area of interest. I apologize for any inconvenience. The link is here if you are interested: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?/archive1. Aoba47 ( talk) 03:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, would you be able to take a look at Talk:Spock#Structure and content of this article and give your opinion? I'd like to see if we can do some tidy up work to the article prior to the 50th next month. Miyagawa ( talk) 16:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
The copyright holder is "Unknown" (or possibly anonymous). The video is managed and distributed by viralhog.com .. viralhog.com is a service which allows copyright holders to retain the rights to a work but release it anonymously. viralhog.com manages it for you. Thus, if you have a viral image and want to get paid for it, but don't want your home phone crushed with requests from news agencies, you hand it off to viralhog as an agent and they handle it for you, for a fee. -- Green C 03:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
On 8 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ishka, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that prior to casting Andrea Martin as the female Ferengi Ishka on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, David Livingston suggested Wallace Shawn in drag? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ishka. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ishka), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 08:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22 | No One Mourns the Wicked ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
307 | You Me Her ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
246 | Tattoo ink ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
94 | Headcrab ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
58 | Francis E. Meloy, Jr. ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
8 | Cybils Award ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
6,341 | Mike Pence ( talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
78 | Alyx Vance ( talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
389 | Son (novel) ( talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
146 | Area density ( talk) | Expand | ||||||
42,741 | United States ( talk) | Expand | ||||||
191 | NES Zapper ( talk) | Expand | ||||||
63 | Dennis Fong ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
17,794 | Ronald Reagan ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
13,612 | Star Trek: The Original Series ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
249 | Temporary tattoo ( talk) | Merge | ||||||
6 | HPCC Systems ( talk) | Merge | ||||||
248 | Good Sam Enterprises ( talk) | Merge | ||||||
9,697 | Batman ( talk) | Wikify | ||||||
327 | Andrés Muschietti ( talk) | Wikify | ||||||
6 | See You Around, Sam! ( talk) | Wikify | ||||||
4 | Aligh n'targa ( talk) | Orphan | ||||||
3 | Aleksei Germashov ( talk) | Orphan | ||||||
2 | Alfred William Buxton ( talk) | Orphan | ||||||
214 | Ellen McLain ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
23 | I'm Not that Girl (song) ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
122 | Body suit (tattoo) ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
24 | General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
5 | WLKT-TV ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
398 | Don Matheson ( talk) | Stub |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 20:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Flanegin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I thought there was a bot that informed nominators, but I guess not. I've begun a review of Anya's Ghost at Talk:Anya's Ghost/GA1. Curly "the jerk" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Fourthords, I just updated Bo Burnham youtube hit count (by creating a brand new wayback archive snapshot as of today) and wonder why you (or someone else, I did not check who first made such edit) set the deadurl=yes. I kept that as it was, but I wonder why it was set to deadurl=yes. I asked this question on Talk:Bo_Burnham#View_counts, so please do answer there. -- Rava77 ( talk) 15:15, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Fourthords, for all your contributions and especially for your help categorizing redirects! I notice that you used the deprecated template {{ This is a redirect}} to tag this redirect shortcut. That has been replaced by the {{ Redirect category shell}} template. So if you tag redirects with...
#REDIRECT [[(target title)]] {{Redirect category shell}}
...that will do the same thing as the This is a redirect template and place the redirect in Category:Miscellaneous redirects. Again, thanks and Best of Everything to You and Yours! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 10:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The interview was linked to from Billy's Joel's official site - https://www.billyjoel.com/news/girl-video-we-didnt-start-fire-marc-tyler-nobleman/ Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 20:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Fourthords. Based upon on discussion about non-free images and fictional characters at WT:NFCC, I'm wondering what you think about File:Dr Loveless beaker.jpg. The article Dr. Loveless is basically only citing IMDb, and there actually appears to be a freely licensed photo in the character being used in the article. This is, however, a slightly different situation than being discussed at WT:NFCC because it might be argued that there is something more than the actor's real world appearance being depicted. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Then there's File:Dr Loveless beaker.jpg. You're absolutely right, there's nothing reliably-sourced in the article to warrant using non-free content, ESPECIALLY since we HAVE a libre image to use in its place! I'd remove it from the article, tag it with {{ di-orphaned fair use}}, and let nature run its course.
Then there's the article Dr. Loveless itself. It cites the IMDb, but in none of the "Appropriate uses" at Wikipedia:Citing IMDb, so it has effectively been wholly unsourced for it's entire 10+ year history. My off-the-cuff inclination is to redirect it to The Wild Wild West#Villains until such time as sufficient sources arise to create either this article again, or at least a list of The Wild Wild West characters. However, nothing at the parent article about Loveless is sourced either, so it's kinda six-of-one, half-a-dozen of the other. /shrug
I hope some of this has been at least marginally helpful. I tend to be verbose, and I'm not 100% certain I answered your question, so please (PLEASE!) get back to me here if I was unclear or, you know, wrong. :^) — fourthords | =Λ= | 15:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Re your revert, the reason I added Category:Military enlisted ranks of the United States is because I noticed this cat already includes Airman and Senior airman. Should we delete this parent cat from those two pages also? I was just trying to give consistent treatment to all three USAF ranks. Thanks for your service to Wikipedia. Eagle4000 ( talk) 02:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I think of it as a hierarchy: airman basic is the… well, Airman. Their immediate supervisor is Category:Enlisted ranks of the United States Air Force; that's "the most specific categor[y] to which it logically belongs." Now, Category:Enlisted ranks of the United States Air Force's immediate supervisor is Category:United States military enlisted ranks, as it's the "the most specific categor[y] to which it logically belongs." Now we're looking at a three-'person' chain-of-command, and just because the highest category isn't the article's immediate supervisor, the article is still subordinate to the highest category. Does that make any sense? — fourthords | =Λ= | 20:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
P.S. I added a colon to your original comment; without it, you're not so much linking to the category (which I assume was your intension), but instead categorizing my user talk page. Please take no offense to my edit to your comment.
I have read through your links and still do not understand why this logo is not allowed to be displayed in the Disney Junior Canada article?! Care to explain this Wikipedia rules BS in plain English for me as I don't speak legalese?! Do I have to upload a separate image for that article or will that be deleted as well?! The GateKeeper07 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:06, 9 June 2017
The page Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:NFC) is a content guideline; it is essentially an elaboration of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria (WP:NFCC), which is "a Wikipedia policy with legal considerations." A consensus interpretation of policy led to a list of 19 examples of unacceptable uses for images; the 19th of which says, "The logo of an entity used for identification of one of its child entities, when the child entity lacks their own branding. Specific child entity logos remain acceptable." In this instance, Disney Junior is the parent entity, and its different regional and national variants are the child entities, meaning that the Disney Junior logo may only be used for the parent article and not for the others. A public discussion about this file took place for three months between a half-dozen contributors ( Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 3#File:Disney Junior Logo.png); as of its administrative closure five months ago, consensus remained unchanged and the result of the discussion was "keep in Disney Junior, remove all other instances."
If you disagree with the recent administrative decision, you might want to ask about it at Explicit's talk page, much as you did here. However, if you want to dispute the guideline's interpretation of the policy, you should start a new discussion at NFC's talk page. I hope this all makes sense; let me know if you have any other questions! — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:25, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Fourthords, very much for saying that my efforts to improve and expand the article Elijah Daniel successfully demonstrate that it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. DIFF.
Especially during this trying period of time, I really appreciate your being so willing and kind to acknowledge the hours upon hours of research and writing that I've recently put into this.
Thank you. Sagecandor ( talk) 00:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Now that you've called my attention to it: not only have you massively improved it since I last looked, but all your efforts since 01:32, 6 July 2017 (a 420% expansion of content) are very impressive and very welcome. Thank you for your efforts. — fourthords | =Λ= | 02:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Why does the article on Matthew Fenton have your username behind its title? This could have misled Wikipedia readers into thinking it is a userpage, which probably explains why the page does not have any categories. Vorbee ( talk) 17:55, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
As for what you saw: I wrote an article at Matthew Fenton sometime over ten years ago. In April 2007, 203.10.224.58 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) nominated the article for deletion. I did not participate in the discussion, and in the end, Eastmain ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) decided that the consensus was to delete the article—essentially under the policy at WP:NOTAMEMORIAL. About two years later, I wanted some of the code I'd once used in that article. I found a mirrored copy elsewhere, copied the code, and pasted it at User:Fourthords/Matthew Fenton, where it has sat since.
It is not categorized because " user subpages that are draft versions of articles should be kept out of content categories". — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Kewaunee Fabrications".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 17:22, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Please don't use the {{ Stub}} tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort when you can. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 09:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Can you give Disappearance of Sheila Fox a proofread/grammar check, please. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 08:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you tagged my image for File:Disney Junior.svg for deletion. I am trying to understand what I did wrong, as I specified that it was a logo covered by fair use, so if you have time, I would appreciate if you would get back to me. Thank you and have a good night. JE98 ( talk) 01:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
You might consider asking the administrator who deleted the superseded PNG-version of the logo— Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)—for the rationale that was used on that old file; that might save you time and effort. — fourthords | =Λ= | 10:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk • contribs) 03:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
I changed the license on File:Disney Junior.svg, and didn't notice it had been subject to discussion. Sorry for not checking. In essence, all of the components which make up said logo can be found here, because they don't pass the threshold of originality. I don't understand why this one should be any different. Thank you -- Ben Stone 20:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
You're right, of course: copyrightability (and compliance with the non-free content criteria) isn't subject to consensus. However, in the discussion to which I linked previously, Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) noted that (a) the United States Copyright Office registered the copyright of the Disney Junior logo for Disney Enterprises, Inc. on 15 October 2010 (registration number VAu001043271), and (b) the Wikimedia Commons specifically lists the Disney Junior logo as " above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection." Could these be argued against? Certainly, though I don't know how much traction you'll get on the matter. If you decide to though, please let me know!
As for the {{ ping}} template, I am aware of it, but decry its existence as obnoxious and a social-mediafication of the encyclopedia to which I contribute. If, for this discussion, you'd prefer I use it rather than watching this page, I've no problem obliging such: @ Benstown:. — fourthords | =Λ= | 20:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Can you edit/expand/copyedit Murder of Heather Rich, please? Or add it to your watchlist? Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 14:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Ostrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
People keep trying to put copyvio photos of O'Rourke into the infobox. Maybe your idea of a photo from Poltergeist III wasn't such s bad idea... Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 05:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
I didn't mean to cause this mess. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 03:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Bridgette Andersen might use some of your good attention, please. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 17:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
There are no restrictions on accessibility in draftspace; if a merge is intended, that can just as well be done using draft sources as mainspace sources. And we can't have two versions of the same article live at the same time, one with a weird "/draft" rider. Please leave in draftspace. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
I am puzzled by some of the edits you made to my copy edit of the article Bridgette Andersen. The Findagrave citation provided the exact date of birth and death. Apparently The Havre News citation is incomplete at best and may be a dead link. What's the problem with accurate detail? It's normal practice to provide dob and dod whenever possible.
It's pretty obvious from reading the text why the "Clarify" tag was added. I hope you'll agree with my amended tag. I had already advised the individual who requested the copy edit of the issue on their talk page when I finished the copy edit.
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:44, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
The citation to Havre Daily News gives the source, date, and page of a newspaper. It's not a dead link because it doesn't link to a website. Your duplicate citation linked to a third-party site that charges for access to the periodical, which doesn't lend any further credibility to the source than not. There's nothing wrong with accurate detail, of course, but it must be accompanied by citations to reliable sources.
As to your {{ clarify}} tag, I'm concerned you're only reading the article through code and missing how it's actually written. If we delete the citations from the sentence in question, it reads, "Writer and co-star Mark Miller was inspired by—and wrote the part for—his daughter, Savannah Miller." Does that read correctly for you? Mr. Miller was (a) inspired by and (b) wrote the part for: Savannah Miller, his daughter. Does that need further clarification? — fourthords | =Λ= | 23:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
P.S. This might have been more appropriate at Talk:Bridgette Andersen; I'm going to leave a pointer there.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benihana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 56th Street ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick Dantzler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Coalition ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Court-martial of Terry Lakin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cohen ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Fourthords,
I see you changed my Discover edit from today. I'd like to understand your reasoning. I had added DIS and DISCO, as both are in wide use, I think the list should reflect all current abb used for the show.
What do you think? Glad someone else is passionate about Star Trek. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamschellenberg ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Just letting you know that Diana Serra Cary needs your tender loving care. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 11:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:62 AW English.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy1018 ( talk) 14:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Bridgette's fan club seems to be targeting the article. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 14:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Just bringing Murder of Rachael Runyan to your attention for your expert work. My dear friend. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 00:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Fourthords. In accordance with the template message's wording, I just removed it from the above article. Please feel free to replace it if needed.
PS: I can't help but "sense" that Witt may be a triple agent. Thoughts? Also, that august publication, the Daily Mail, gave a motivation for her defection as being her disgust at the pervasive sexual harrassment of women by men in the Air Force. Did you read any hints of this in other sources?-- Quisqualis ( talk) 16:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Fourthords. This is the third mass revert ( 1 2 3) on Monica Witt. While some of the things that you reverted were correct, in all of them you removed good edits. -- Guerillero | Parlez Moi 05:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I just felt 2010 was 9 years ago (and thus an outdated conversion). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Electricmaster ( talk • contribs) 18:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah ( talk) 15:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarTrek Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — fourthords | =Λ= | 21:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anya's Ghost, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coloring and Well. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Humayun Khan (soldier), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bystander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kewaunee Fabrications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. for (;;) (talk) 12:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I've nominated the article about the episode " Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?" for Featured Article consideration. I would really appreciate any comments or feedback on this nomination. I know you have done only minor edits the article, but I would greatly appreciate your input. It is completely okay if you are too busy or would not like to do this as I know this is outside of your area of interest. I apologize for any inconvenience. The link is here if you are interested: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?/archive1. Aoba47 ( talk) 03:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, would you be able to take a look at Talk:Spock#Structure and content of this article and give your opinion? I'd like to see if we can do some tidy up work to the article prior to the 50th next month. Miyagawa ( talk) 16:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
The copyright holder is "Unknown" (or possibly anonymous). The video is managed and distributed by viralhog.com .. viralhog.com is a service which allows copyright holders to retain the rights to a work but release it anonymously. viralhog.com manages it for you. Thus, if you have a viral image and want to get paid for it, but don't want your home phone crushed with requests from news agencies, you hand it off to viralhog as an agent and they handle it for you, for a fee. -- Green C 03:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
On 8 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ishka, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that prior to casting Andrea Martin as the female Ferengi Ishka on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, David Livingston suggested Wallace Shawn in drag? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ishka. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ishka), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 08:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22 | No One Mourns the Wicked ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
307 | You Me Her ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
246 | Tattoo ink ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
94 | Headcrab ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
58 | Francis E. Meloy, Jr. ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
8 | Cybils Award ( talk) | Add sources | ||||||
6,341 | Mike Pence ( talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
78 | Alyx Vance ( talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
389 | Son (novel) ( talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
146 | Area density ( talk) | Expand | ||||||
42,741 | United States ( talk) | Expand | ||||||
191 | NES Zapper ( talk) | Expand | ||||||
63 | Dennis Fong ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
17,794 | Ronald Reagan ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
13,612 | Star Trek: The Original Series ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
249 | Temporary tattoo ( talk) | Merge | ||||||
6 | HPCC Systems ( talk) | Merge | ||||||
248 | Good Sam Enterprises ( talk) | Merge | ||||||
9,697 | Batman ( talk) | Wikify | ||||||
327 | Andrés Muschietti ( talk) | Wikify | ||||||
6 | See You Around, Sam! ( talk) | Wikify | ||||||
4 | Aligh n'targa ( talk) | Orphan | ||||||
3 | Aleksei Germashov ( talk) | Orphan | ||||||
2 | Alfred William Buxton ( talk) | Orphan | ||||||
214 | Ellen McLain ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
23 | I'm Not that Girl (song) ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
122 | Body suit (tattoo) ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
24 | General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
5 | WLKT-TV ( talk) | Stub | ||||||
398 | Don Matheson ( talk) | Stub |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 20:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Flanegin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I thought there was a bot that informed nominators, but I guess not. I've begun a review of Anya's Ghost at Talk:Anya's Ghost/GA1. Curly "the jerk" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Fourthords, I just updated Bo Burnham youtube hit count (by creating a brand new wayback archive snapshot as of today) and wonder why you (or someone else, I did not check who first made such edit) set the deadurl=yes. I kept that as it was, but I wonder why it was set to deadurl=yes. I asked this question on Talk:Bo_Burnham#View_counts, so please do answer there. -- Rava77 ( talk) 15:15, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Fourthords, for all your contributions and especially for your help categorizing redirects! I notice that you used the deprecated template {{ This is a redirect}} to tag this redirect shortcut. That has been replaced by the {{ Redirect category shell}} template. So if you tag redirects with...
#REDIRECT [[(target title)]] {{Redirect category shell}}
...that will do the same thing as the This is a redirect template and place the redirect in Category:Miscellaneous redirects. Again, thanks and Best of Everything to You and Yours! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 10:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The interview was linked to from Billy's Joel's official site - https://www.billyjoel.com/news/girl-video-we-didnt-start-fire-marc-tyler-nobleman/ Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 20:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Fourthords. Based upon on discussion about non-free images and fictional characters at WT:NFCC, I'm wondering what you think about File:Dr Loveless beaker.jpg. The article Dr. Loveless is basically only citing IMDb, and there actually appears to be a freely licensed photo in the character being used in the article. This is, however, a slightly different situation than being discussed at WT:NFCC because it might be argued that there is something more than the actor's real world appearance being depicted. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Then there's File:Dr Loveless beaker.jpg. You're absolutely right, there's nothing reliably-sourced in the article to warrant using non-free content, ESPECIALLY since we HAVE a libre image to use in its place! I'd remove it from the article, tag it with {{ di-orphaned fair use}}, and let nature run its course.
Then there's the article Dr. Loveless itself. It cites the IMDb, but in none of the "Appropriate uses" at Wikipedia:Citing IMDb, so it has effectively been wholly unsourced for it's entire 10+ year history. My off-the-cuff inclination is to redirect it to The Wild Wild West#Villains until such time as sufficient sources arise to create either this article again, or at least a list of The Wild Wild West characters. However, nothing at the parent article about Loveless is sourced either, so it's kinda six-of-one, half-a-dozen of the other. /shrug
I hope some of this has been at least marginally helpful. I tend to be verbose, and I'm not 100% certain I answered your question, so please (PLEASE!) get back to me here if I was unclear or, you know, wrong. :^) — fourthords | =Λ= | 15:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Re your revert, the reason I added Category:Military enlisted ranks of the United States is because I noticed this cat already includes Airman and Senior airman. Should we delete this parent cat from those two pages also? I was just trying to give consistent treatment to all three USAF ranks. Thanks for your service to Wikipedia. Eagle4000 ( talk) 02:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I think of it as a hierarchy: airman basic is the… well, Airman. Their immediate supervisor is Category:Enlisted ranks of the United States Air Force; that's "the most specific categor[y] to which it logically belongs." Now, Category:Enlisted ranks of the United States Air Force's immediate supervisor is Category:United States military enlisted ranks, as it's the "the most specific categor[y] to which it logically belongs." Now we're looking at a three-'person' chain-of-command, and just because the highest category isn't the article's immediate supervisor, the article is still subordinate to the highest category. Does that make any sense? — fourthords | =Λ= | 20:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
P.S. I added a colon to your original comment; without it, you're not so much linking to the category (which I assume was your intension), but instead categorizing my user talk page. Please take no offense to my edit to your comment.
I have read through your links and still do not understand why this logo is not allowed to be displayed in the Disney Junior Canada article?! Care to explain this Wikipedia rules BS in plain English for me as I don't speak legalese?! Do I have to upload a separate image for that article or will that be deleted as well?! The GateKeeper07 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:06, 9 June 2017
The page Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:NFC) is a content guideline; it is essentially an elaboration of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria (WP:NFCC), which is "a Wikipedia policy with legal considerations." A consensus interpretation of policy led to a list of 19 examples of unacceptable uses for images; the 19th of which says, "The logo of an entity used for identification of one of its child entities, when the child entity lacks their own branding. Specific child entity logos remain acceptable." In this instance, Disney Junior is the parent entity, and its different regional and national variants are the child entities, meaning that the Disney Junior logo may only be used for the parent article and not for the others. A public discussion about this file took place for three months between a half-dozen contributors ( Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 3#File:Disney Junior Logo.png); as of its administrative closure five months ago, consensus remained unchanged and the result of the discussion was "keep in Disney Junior, remove all other instances."
If you disagree with the recent administrative decision, you might want to ask about it at Explicit's talk page, much as you did here. However, if you want to dispute the guideline's interpretation of the policy, you should start a new discussion at NFC's talk page. I hope this all makes sense; let me know if you have any other questions! — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:25, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Fourthords, very much for saying that my efforts to improve and expand the article Elijah Daniel successfully demonstrate that it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. DIFF.
Especially during this trying period of time, I really appreciate your being so willing and kind to acknowledge the hours upon hours of research and writing that I've recently put into this.
Thank you. Sagecandor ( talk) 00:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Now that you've called my attention to it: not only have you massively improved it since I last looked, but all your efforts since 01:32, 6 July 2017 (a 420% expansion of content) are very impressive and very welcome. Thank you for your efforts. — fourthords | =Λ= | 02:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Why does the article on Matthew Fenton have your username behind its title? This could have misled Wikipedia readers into thinking it is a userpage, which probably explains why the page does not have any categories. Vorbee ( talk) 17:55, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
As for what you saw: I wrote an article at Matthew Fenton sometime over ten years ago. In April 2007, 203.10.224.58 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) nominated the article for deletion. I did not participate in the discussion, and in the end, Eastmain ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) decided that the consensus was to delete the article—essentially under the policy at WP:NOTAMEMORIAL. About two years later, I wanted some of the code I'd once used in that article. I found a mirrored copy elsewhere, copied the code, and pasted it at User:Fourthords/Matthew Fenton, where it has sat since.
It is not categorized because " user subpages that are draft versions of articles should be kept out of content categories". — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Kewaunee Fabrications".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 17:22, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Please don't use the {{ Stub}} tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort when you can. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 09:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Can you give Disappearance of Sheila Fox a proofread/grammar check, please. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 08:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you tagged my image for File:Disney Junior.svg for deletion. I am trying to understand what I did wrong, as I specified that it was a logo covered by fair use, so if you have time, I would appreciate if you would get back to me. Thank you and have a good night. JE98 ( talk) 01:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
You might consider asking the administrator who deleted the superseded PNG-version of the logo— Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)—for the rationale that was used on that old file; that might save you time and effort. — fourthords | =Λ= | 10:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk • contribs) 03:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
I changed the license on File:Disney Junior.svg, and didn't notice it had been subject to discussion. Sorry for not checking. In essence, all of the components which make up said logo can be found here, because they don't pass the threshold of originality. I don't understand why this one should be any different. Thank you -- Ben Stone 20:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
You're right, of course: copyrightability (and compliance with the non-free content criteria) isn't subject to consensus. However, in the discussion to which I linked previously, Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) noted that (a) the United States Copyright Office registered the copyright of the Disney Junior logo for Disney Enterprises, Inc. on 15 October 2010 (registration number VAu001043271), and (b) the Wikimedia Commons specifically lists the Disney Junior logo as " above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection." Could these be argued against? Certainly, though I don't know how much traction you'll get on the matter. If you decide to though, please let me know!
As for the {{ ping}} template, I am aware of it, but decry its existence as obnoxious and a social-mediafication of the encyclopedia to which I contribute. If, for this discussion, you'd prefer I use it rather than watching this page, I've no problem obliging such: @ Benstown:. — fourthords | =Λ= | 20:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Can you edit/expand/copyedit Murder of Heather Rich, please? Or add it to your watchlist? Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 14:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Ostrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
People keep trying to put copyvio photos of O'Rourke into the infobox. Maybe your idea of a photo from Poltergeist III wasn't such s bad idea... Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 05:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
I didn't mean to cause this mess. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 03:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Bridgette Andersen might use some of your good attention, please. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 17:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
There are no restrictions on accessibility in draftspace; if a merge is intended, that can just as well be done using draft sources as mainspace sources. And we can't have two versions of the same article live at the same time, one with a weird "/draft" rider. Please leave in draftspace. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
I am puzzled by some of the edits you made to my copy edit of the article Bridgette Andersen. The Findagrave citation provided the exact date of birth and death. Apparently The Havre News citation is incomplete at best and may be a dead link. What's the problem with accurate detail? It's normal practice to provide dob and dod whenever possible.
It's pretty obvious from reading the text why the "Clarify" tag was added. I hope you'll agree with my amended tag. I had already advised the individual who requested the copy edit of the issue on their talk page when I finished the copy edit.
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:44, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
The citation to Havre Daily News gives the source, date, and page of a newspaper. It's not a dead link because it doesn't link to a website. Your duplicate citation linked to a third-party site that charges for access to the periodical, which doesn't lend any further credibility to the source than not. There's nothing wrong with accurate detail, of course, but it must be accompanied by citations to reliable sources.
As to your {{ clarify}} tag, I'm concerned you're only reading the article through code and missing how it's actually written. If we delete the citations from the sentence in question, it reads, "Writer and co-star Mark Miller was inspired by—and wrote the part for—his daughter, Savannah Miller." Does that read correctly for you? Mr. Miller was (a) inspired by and (b) wrote the part for: Savannah Miller, his daughter. Does that need further clarification? — fourthords | =Λ= | 23:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
P.S. This might have been more appropriate at Talk:Bridgette Andersen; I'm going to leave a pointer there.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benihana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 56th Street ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick Dantzler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Coalition ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Court-martial of Terry Lakin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cohen ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Fourthords,
I see you changed my Discover edit from today. I'd like to understand your reasoning. I had added DIS and DISCO, as both are in wide use, I think the list should reflect all current abb used for the show.
What do you think? Glad someone else is passionate about Star Trek. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamschellenberg ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Just letting you know that Diana Serra Cary needs your tender loving care. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 11:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Fourthords. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:62 AW English.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy1018 ( talk) 14:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Bridgette's fan club seems to be targeting the article. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 14:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Just bringing Murder of Rachael Runyan to your attention for your expert work. My dear friend. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 00:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Fourthords. In accordance with the template message's wording, I just removed it from the above article. Please feel free to replace it if needed.
PS: I can't help but "sense" that Witt may be a triple agent. Thoughts? Also, that august publication, the Daily Mail, gave a motivation for her defection as being her disgust at the pervasive sexual harrassment of women by men in the Air Force. Did you read any hints of this in other sources?-- Quisqualis ( talk) 16:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Fourthords. This is the third mass revert ( 1 2 3) on Monica Witt. While some of the things that you reverted were correct, in all of them you removed good edits. -- Guerillero | Parlez Moi 05:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I just felt 2010 was 9 years ago (and thus an outdated conversion). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Electricmaster ( talk • contribs) 18:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)