This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Errant, thanks for taking a look at the SAS Institute article.
I may cull over it again tomorrow, but I think I'm done with the restructuring/expansion and have pointed out the areas I should not edit directly on the Talk page in a Request Edit.
I would also be interested in your thoughts on the overall structure purely as an editorial question.
Thanks again. COIDave ( talk) 18:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
This talk archive is still at the old title. Missed in the page move? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SpamCop. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
ErrantX: the examples of mathematical trolling started with A.K.Nole (the first account) on Butcher group and minimal subtraction scheme. Ex-arbitrators, including Charles Matthews, YellowMonkey and Paul August, agreed with me that the contributions were superfical and amounted to trolling. That was just the start and that kind of incompetent trolling on articles has continued. The example from June 2012 with uniformly bounded representation is described on the RfAr page. As Denis Brown has said, it is hard for an administrator without mathematical training to determine when trolling is taking place in articles like this. In the two articles mentioned above, A.K.Nole copy-pasted content from the first unduly into the second. I think the correct place to discuss the issues concerning A.K.Nole/Echigo mole is when I have sufficiently recovered to prepare a preliminary LTA page. In fact I have hardly reverted any edits by Echigo mole recently. Spar-stangled was an obvious sock, acting as a smart-alec. It took a day or two for his trolling here to be removed and his account indef blocked. In the amendment prior to the review, 4 named sockpuppets interrupted the RfAm. Then there were the edits to Reginald of Durham (connected with articles on early saints) and the trolling on User talk:Malleus Fatuorum. There is no simple pattern here. Only when users can look at an LTA page can any reasonable discussion take place. Certainly sanctioning me is no way of solving the problem. As I have said, in the past often socks or ipsocks were blocked by just tipping off a checkuser discreetly. With the complications created by the DeviantArt editors taking advantage of Echigo mole's trolling, the banned user was given more air time than was his due. I prefer reports to be made behind the scenes so as not to feed the troll. None of this can be solved here. The use of tor nodes & open proxies was his latest little game. What is slightly clearer is that Mikemikev is in Korea teaching English. [1] He's done teaching in the Far East before, so he's no longer editing from IPs like this one at UCL (or at ICL). No arbcom sanctions can solve the problem of Echigo mole and it is misguided to suggest otherwise. Cheers, Mathsci (from UCLH) 195.194.4.65 ( talk) 17:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi ErrantX, I've brought Bertram up to DYK, and yes I have writer's cramp. I've drawn a map of the whole thing, which may make the situation a little clearer. I know you're in waist-deep getting Dudley Clarke up to FA, but as they say, when you need help, ask a busy person... Could you take a look at Bertram and give me a heads-up? many thanks Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing the Dr. Thomas Hinde article. If there are any other edits you need me to make please let me know. Thanks. Lawman4312 ( talk) 07:44, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I nominated Template:Did you know nominations/Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice nearly a month ago with the intention of having the review completed by the time Remembrance Day comes round this Sunday. Unfortunately that hasn't happened yet. I noticed that you've reviewed or contributed both of the other Remembrance Day-related articles currently listed in T:TDYK - might you be able to review my nomination as well? Prioryman ( talk) 01:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Resysoping of FCYTravis / Polarscribe and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
On 11 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Bevan (British Army officer), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Colonel John Bevan's contribution to military deception planning during World War II was kept secret until the 1970s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Bevan (British Army officer). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Love. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Meningitis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I am not sure why my image is set to delete. If I took it? I uploaded it? and I gave permission? I am club night Photographer and this is 2nd person wiki deleted saying copyright reasons, but I own and took the photo so, I am confused on how to handle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Photofanboy ( talk • contribs) 18:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Well actually I added the 2 photos of biship Dionysios that are the same with the Greek text (published on the Greek wiki) Μητροπολίτης Κορίνθου, Σικυώνος, Ζεμενού, Ταρσού και Πολυφέγγους Διονύσιος Μάνταλος where I had no problem 688dim ( talk) 21:09, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prometheus (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 23:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 01:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I've opened a second FAC for Natchez Massacre, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Natchez Massacre/archive2, so please comment if you have any thoughts on the article. Thanks. Jsayre64 (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Civility enforcement/Questionnaire Thank you for considering this request. My76Strat ( talk) 09:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Errant, thanks for taking a look at the SAS Institute article.
I may cull over it again tomorrow, but I think I'm done with the restructuring/expansion and have pointed out the areas I should not edit directly on the Talk page in a Request Edit.
I would also be interested in your thoughts on the overall structure purely as an editorial question.
Thanks again. COIDave ( talk) 18:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
This talk archive is still at the old title. Missed in the page move? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SpamCop. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
ErrantX: the examples of mathematical trolling started with A.K.Nole (the first account) on Butcher group and minimal subtraction scheme. Ex-arbitrators, including Charles Matthews, YellowMonkey and Paul August, agreed with me that the contributions were superfical and amounted to trolling. That was just the start and that kind of incompetent trolling on articles has continued. The example from June 2012 with uniformly bounded representation is described on the RfAr page. As Denis Brown has said, it is hard for an administrator without mathematical training to determine when trolling is taking place in articles like this. In the two articles mentioned above, A.K.Nole copy-pasted content from the first unduly into the second. I think the correct place to discuss the issues concerning A.K.Nole/Echigo mole is when I have sufficiently recovered to prepare a preliminary LTA page. In fact I have hardly reverted any edits by Echigo mole recently. Spar-stangled was an obvious sock, acting as a smart-alec. It took a day or two for his trolling here to be removed and his account indef blocked. In the amendment prior to the review, 4 named sockpuppets interrupted the RfAm. Then there were the edits to Reginald of Durham (connected with articles on early saints) and the trolling on User talk:Malleus Fatuorum. There is no simple pattern here. Only when users can look at an LTA page can any reasonable discussion take place. Certainly sanctioning me is no way of solving the problem. As I have said, in the past often socks or ipsocks were blocked by just tipping off a checkuser discreetly. With the complications created by the DeviantArt editors taking advantage of Echigo mole's trolling, the banned user was given more air time than was his due. I prefer reports to be made behind the scenes so as not to feed the troll. None of this can be solved here. The use of tor nodes & open proxies was his latest little game. What is slightly clearer is that Mikemikev is in Korea teaching English. [1] He's done teaching in the Far East before, so he's no longer editing from IPs like this one at UCL (or at ICL). No arbcom sanctions can solve the problem of Echigo mole and it is misguided to suggest otherwise. Cheers, Mathsci (from UCLH) 195.194.4.65 ( talk) 17:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi ErrantX, I've brought Bertram up to DYK, and yes I have writer's cramp. I've drawn a map of the whole thing, which may make the situation a little clearer. I know you're in waist-deep getting Dudley Clarke up to FA, but as they say, when you need help, ask a busy person... Could you take a look at Bertram and give me a heads-up? many thanks Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing the Dr. Thomas Hinde article. If there are any other edits you need me to make please let me know. Thanks. Lawman4312 ( talk) 07:44, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I nominated Template:Did you know nominations/Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice nearly a month ago with the intention of having the review completed by the time Remembrance Day comes round this Sunday. Unfortunately that hasn't happened yet. I noticed that you've reviewed or contributed both of the other Remembrance Day-related articles currently listed in T:TDYK - might you be able to review my nomination as well? Prioryman ( talk) 01:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Resysoping of FCYTravis / Polarscribe and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
On 11 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Bevan (British Army officer), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Colonel John Bevan's contribution to military deception planning during World War II was kept secret until the 1970s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Bevan (British Army officer). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Love. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Meningitis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I am not sure why my image is set to delete. If I took it? I uploaded it? and I gave permission? I am club night Photographer and this is 2nd person wiki deleted saying copyright reasons, but I own and took the photo so, I am confused on how to handle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Photofanboy ( talk • contribs) 18:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Well actually I added the 2 photos of biship Dionysios that are the same with the Greek text (published on the Greek wiki) Μητροπολίτης Κορίνθου, Σικυώνος, Ζεμενού, Ταρσού και Πολυφέγγους Διονύσιος Μάνταλος where I had no problem 688dim ( talk) 21:09, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prometheus (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 23:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 01:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I've opened a second FAC for Natchez Massacre, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Natchez Massacre/archive2, so please comment if you have any thoughts on the article. Thanks. Jsayre64 (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Civility enforcement/Questionnaire Thank you for considering this request. My76Strat ( talk) 09:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)