ARCHIVES
DO NOT ENTER NEW ITEMS HERE--use User talk:DGG
Topical Archives:
Deletion & AfD,
Speedy & prod,
NPP & AfC,
COI & paid editors,
BLP,
Bilateral relations
Notability,
Universities & academic people,
Schools,
Academic journals,
Books & other publications
Sourcing,
Fiction,
In Popular Culture
Educational Program
Bias, intolerance, and prejudice
General Archives:
2006:
Sept-Dec
2007:
Jan-Feb ,
Mar-Apt ,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2008:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2009:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2010:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2011:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2012:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2013:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2014:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2015:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2016:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2017:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2018:
J,
F,
M ,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2019:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2020:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2021:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2022:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2023:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O
DO NOT ENTER NEW ITEMS HERE--use User talk:DGG
I am requesting for restoring the page because I believe notability is not an issue as the subject got references from highly renowned and reliable sites like New York Times, CBS News, Insider Inc and we can find several more online. I feel the only reason for deletion was maybe advertising/promotional tone which I can fix easily. Thanks Jamalahmadpk ( talk) 07:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Would you mind running your eyes over this article, please. It was moved recently to main space. I am wondering whether this topic carries inherent notability or whether it is published to enhance the reputation of the creating editor, who appears to be author of a paper on it. I have trouble determining the peer reviewed status (etc) of papers used in references, and this seems to be a skill you have at your disposal.
Separately, on Commons, I have questioned the licencing of all the pretty pictures. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Hope all is well. Please, excuse me, but if I recollect correctly, we started a discussion about the article on the physicist Lorenzo Iorio. Unfortunately, I did not find anymore that discussion. At which stage we are? Thank you for your help. LuanaTKD ( talk) 17:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)\ LuanaTK The material on Iorio seems at this moment to be a section of your user-talk page. The best thing to do would be to start it again as an AfC. Remember to include a list of the5 or 6 most cited peer reviewed publication, with citation counts form Google Scholar. .Let me know when ready. DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for the edits you made to [ Caroline Rose (Writer)]. Due to health issues I was unable to work on it for a long spell. But I'm back at it and am hoping to re-submit the page in the next few months. I would greatly appreciate any advice you can offer. Postsingular ( talk) 22:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Postsingular, I suggest
Hello. You recently reviewed my proposed article "Hogg Foundation for Mental Health" and determined that it was unsuitable for publication due to internal sourcing and an "advertisement" sort of tone. Full disclosure: I am absolutely not trying to "advertise" this organization; it is a grantmaking organization that does really nice things for the Texas community, and it is so big that I am surprised it does not have a Wikipedia page yet. Beyond removing all internal citations, what recommendations do you have for me in terms of changing the tone/approach to make this article publishable? Thank you so much for your feedback!
KatieEdwardsCapstone ( talk) 17:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
KatieEdwardsCapstone, notability of an organization in Wikipedia is determined not by the virtuous nature of its work, but by references, as specified in WP:NCORP, substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices , not limited to initial funding, or award of individual grants, or staff changes .Almost every reference in the articles is either from itself, or is a minor notice; the most substantial one is from a student newspaper, which is not a reliable source. Try to improve the sourcing, and resubmit; I will leave it to some other reviewer. DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
You just approved of my JRPR page and I was wondering if you would be able to tell me what extra I would need to do to get my Australasian Radiation Protection Society page published. Thank you for any help you can provide!
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the
Researcher user group and
Checkusers who are not administrators can now access
Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (
T301928)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Salpassa
Hello, can you help me to give the proper format or to improve the article that I was preparing? It is a Spanish tradition, specifically Valencian, which is important to be documented. I don't know what the problem is that you have seen: the wikipedia article in Spanish was written by myself and I was inspired by it to write this one, but I don't know if that could be the problem, in any case, can you help me to improve it? did you end up posting it? Thanks — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Marta.866 (
talk •
contribs) 14:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello DGG, many thanks for your recent comments and advice with respect to my work. I would appreciate your assistance to preliminarily judge if, in your opinion, page Draft:Manuel Álvarez-Uría can be moved to mainspace without risking undesired disapproving tags. Your help here will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Neuralia ( talk) 21:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC) as you can see, it's been accepted
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Could you take a look at this draft? I provided him with links to sources from Forbes and the profile magazine. Валерий Пасько ( talk) 17:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Deepfriedokra suggested that you might be in a position to assist me. I'm an employee of the Alameda County Library system and we may be interested in utilizing the Wikipedian in residence program, as I have some previous experience on the 'pedia. How might we go about establishing that? Also, it's not entirely clear to me how the WiR program interacts with Disclosure in the sense of COI and PAID. Thanks for any insight you can offer. - Libraryguy1312 ( talk) 16:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Libraryguy1312 , please see your talk page for further explanation. DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
April 24, 2-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the barbecue area of Brooklyn's Fort Greene Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
-- Wikimedia New York City Team MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dr. SETI ® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Dr. SETI ® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I implemented your request. Could you, please, help me in continuing the publication process of this article? Thank you. LuanaTKD ( talk) 15:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Been a while since I came on an academic notability fishing trip :D Found Brummett in the backlog and I think she's notable based on citations as well (?) as having served as a distinguished professor. Am I right on this? I added some on her publications, two of which appear well cited enough. Thanks either way. Star Mississippi 18:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Star Mississippi , thanks for the rescue. I usually add all the books, and, ideally try to find reviews for them. But she is certainly notable and the article is good enough to stand up now. DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Greetings,
I do have a Draft:Re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia I wish it gets reverted back to earlier draft name Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia for conveying clear objective. this is the dif of previous move by your good selves
Since I am not looking for in the intended article some one praised or condemned conversion of Hagia Sophia that kind of list of reactions, but interested in taking encyclopedic note of proper intellectual discourse. I wish to approach related project talk pages and users for further expansion help I wish to retain earlier draft name as stated above.
May be after completion of the draft change of name can be given thought to but in stage of development I wish to retain full name Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia. Requesting your help in the same.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 13:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
At
WP:Requests for undeletion#Draft:Kristian G. Andersen you said and I have therefofre undeleted it.
however I see no action taken. Also, why do you need to restore deleted articles to look at them, and why does this require a gadget? As an admin, can't you directly go to the deleted article's history and view the content?
Jay
(talk) 10:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Really, this should not have been accepted in the state it was! Johnbod ( talk) 01:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
ARCHIVES
DO NOT ENTER NEW ITEMS HERE--use User talk:DGG
Topical Archives:
Deletion & AfD,
Speedy & prod,
NPP & AfC,
COI & paid editors,
BLP,
Bilateral relations
Notability,
Universities & academic people,
Schools,
Academic journals,
Books & other publications
Sourcing,
Fiction,
In Popular Culture
Educational Program
Bias, intolerance, and prejudice
General Archives:
2006:
Sept-Dec
2007:
Jan-Feb ,
Mar-Apt ,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2008:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2009:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2010:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2011:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2012:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2013:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2014:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2015:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2016:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2017:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2018:
J,
F,
M ,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2019:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2020:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2021:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2022:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O,
N,
D
2023:
J,
F,
M,
A,
M,
J,
J,
A,
S,
O
DO NOT ENTER NEW ITEMS HERE--use User talk:DGG
I am requesting for restoring the page because I believe notability is not an issue as the subject got references from highly renowned and reliable sites like New York Times, CBS News, Insider Inc and we can find several more online. I feel the only reason for deletion was maybe advertising/promotional tone which I can fix easily. Thanks Jamalahmadpk ( talk) 07:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Would you mind running your eyes over this article, please. It was moved recently to main space. I am wondering whether this topic carries inherent notability or whether it is published to enhance the reputation of the creating editor, who appears to be author of a paper on it. I have trouble determining the peer reviewed status (etc) of papers used in references, and this seems to be a skill you have at your disposal.
Separately, on Commons, I have questioned the licencing of all the pretty pictures. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Hope all is well. Please, excuse me, but if I recollect correctly, we started a discussion about the article on the physicist Lorenzo Iorio. Unfortunately, I did not find anymore that discussion. At which stage we are? Thank you for your help. LuanaTKD ( talk) 17:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)\ LuanaTK The material on Iorio seems at this moment to be a section of your user-talk page. The best thing to do would be to start it again as an AfC. Remember to include a list of the5 or 6 most cited peer reviewed publication, with citation counts form Google Scholar. .Let me know when ready. DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for the edits you made to [ Caroline Rose (Writer)]. Due to health issues I was unable to work on it for a long spell. But I'm back at it and am hoping to re-submit the page in the next few months. I would greatly appreciate any advice you can offer. Postsingular ( talk) 22:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Postsingular, I suggest
Hello. You recently reviewed my proposed article "Hogg Foundation for Mental Health" and determined that it was unsuitable for publication due to internal sourcing and an "advertisement" sort of tone. Full disclosure: I am absolutely not trying to "advertise" this organization; it is a grantmaking organization that does really nice things for the Texas community, and it is so big that I am surprised it does not have a Wikipedia page yet. Beyond removing all internal citations, what recommendations do you have for me in terms of changing the tone/approach to make this article publishable? Thank you so much for your feedback!
KatieEdwardsCapstone ( talk) 17:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
KatieEdwardsCapstone, notability of an organization in Wikipedia is determined not by the virtuous nature of its work, but by references, as specified in WP:NCORP, substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices , not limited to initial funding, or award of individual grants, or staff changes .Almost every reference in the articles is either from itself, or is a minor notice; the most substantial one is from a student newspaper, which is not a reliable source. Try to improve the sourcing, and resubmit; I will leave it to some other reviewer. DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
You just approved of my JRPR page and I was wondering if you would be able to tell me what extra I would need to do to get my Australasian Radiation Protection Society page published. Thank you for any help you can provide!
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the
Researcher user group and
Checkusers who are not administrators can now access
Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (
T301928)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Salpassa
Hello, can you help me to give the proper format or to improve the article that I was preparing? It is a Spanish tradition, specifically Valencian, which is important to be documented. I don't know what the problem is that you have seen: the wikipedia article in Spanish was written by myself and I was inspired by it to write this one, but I don't know if that could be the problem, in any case, can you help me to improve it? did you end up posting it? Thanks — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Marta.866 (
talk •
contribs) 14:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello DGG, many thanks for your recent comments and advice with respect to my work. I would appreciate your assistance to preliminarily judge if, in your opinion, page Draft:Manuel Álvarez-Uría can be moved to mainspace without risking undesired disapproving tags. Your help here will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Neuralia ( talk) 21:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC) as you can see, it's been accepted
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Could you take a look at this draft? I provided him with links to sources from Forbes and the profile magazine. Валерий Пасько ( talk) 17:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Deepfriedokra suggested that you might be in a position to assist me. I'm an employee of the Alameda County Library system and we may be interested in utilizing the Wikipedian in residence program, as I have some previous experience on the 'pedia. How might we go about establishing that? Also, it's not entirely clear to me how the WiR program interacts with Disclosure in the sense of COI and PAID. Thanks for any insight you can offer. - Libraryguy1312 ( talk) 16:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Libraryguy1312 , please see your talk page for further explanation. DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
April 24, 2-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the barbecue area of Brooklyn's Fort Greene Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
-- Wikimedia New York City Team MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dr. SETI ® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Dr. SETI ® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I implemented your request. Could you, please, help me in continuing the publication process of this article? Thank you. LuanaTKD ( talk) 15:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Been a while since I came on an academic notability fishing trip :D Found Brummett in the backlog and I think she's notable based on citations as well (?) as having served as a distinguished professor. Am I right on this? I added some on her publications, two of which appear well cited enough. Thanks either way. Star Mississippi 18:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Star Mississippi , thanks for the rescue. I usually add all the books, and, ideally try to find reviews for them. But she is certainly notable and the article is good enough to stand up now. DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Greetings,
I do have a Draft:Re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia I wish it gets reverted back to earlier draft name Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia for conveying clear objective. this is the dif of previous move by your good selves
Since I am not looking for in the intended article some one praised or condemned conversion of Hagia Sophia that kind of list of reactions, but interested in taking encyclopedic note of proper intellectual discourse. I wish to approach related project talk pages and users for further expansion help I wish to retain earlier draft name as stated above.
May be after completion of the draft change of name can be given thought to but in stage of development I wish to retain full name Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia. Requesting your help in the same.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 13:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
At
WP:Requests for undeletion#Draft:Kristian G. Andersen you said and I have therefofre undeleted it.
however I see no action taken. Also, why do you need to restore deleted articles to look at them, and why does this require a gadget? As an admin, can't you directly go to the deleted article's history and view the content?
Jay
(talk) 10:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Really, this should not have been accepted in the state it was! Johnbod ( talk) 01:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)