This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
Hello, Bradv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aydin Aghdashloo. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
I intend to have "Yee" reviewed. German Gamer 77 21:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
hello Bradv,
So this page exists on other countries wikipedia pages. Why is this being rejected for the usa when it has credible sources, links to publications and international album release reviews, the all music guide, Kerrang, metal hammer,etc.
What needs to be done to finally get this up for good? This is a group who have sold well, toured and had major album releases since 1988. Any help would be so appreciated. Dirkworld ( talk) 02:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Why did you reverse the Rojava-related articles that I moved? I thought I had followed the guidelines, I waited a week and there was pretty much consensus on the talk pages. The only one who opposed misunderstood the sources, which I explained to him but he didn't respond much to that. So I thought that according to the regulations regarding moves ("Consensus is determined not just by considering the preferences of the participants in a given discussion, but also by evaluating their arguments, assigning due weight accordingly..") that it would be valid for me to move them. AntonSamuel ( talk) 13:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Dear Bradv,
As suggested by you, changes has been made in the reference section. The blog references has been replaced with authentic book references.
This article is very important piece of history, which is missing now. Please check Wikipedia page on Battle of Chinhat for more reference on Barkat Ahmad.
Umair ( talk) 03:03, 6 December 2017 (IST)
According to the current draft of Wikipedia:Names of articles on recent events, first sentence, "There is no consensus" on article naming. We are keeping track of the results of RMs like this one to help establish consensus over time. Thus having a closure for or against based on the arguments would be helpful. Even if the close is "no consensus -> default to current name with date". -- Green C 02:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
Sorry to interrupt you but I found that my article was declined for the reason of liking an advertisement. However, I refer to some independent, reliable, published sources to write this. It's really confused. Would you mind to help me?
Thanks Enyce — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enycez99 ( talk • contribs) 02:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Have submitted the link where it defines notability and reason why award was given. Please see newly added link with details. As its been awarded in 2011 there are few archives available at this point and this is one of them, which defines notability. I also chatted on wiki and got it confirmed. Please recheck.
[1] — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Brutesin (
talk •
contribs) 06:28, February 21, 2017 (UTC)
References
Hi Bradv- I would love some assistance with the Liposarcoma Genome Project page. Liposarcoma is a rare cancer and thus not a great deal has been published about it. But how can people learn about rare cancers if the wikipedia page is denied due to insufficient sources. When the Director of the National Institute of Health posts an article about the lead liposarcoma genome project researcher at MGH/Harvard/Broad Institute, Bradley Bernstein,well what more evidence is needed to give this cancer credibility? I would like help please. Thank you. Ead345 ( talk) 01:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)EAD345
Hi Bradv- I am unclear why the liposarcoma genome project was denied. The articles listed were incredibly notable- the Director of the National Institute of Health just wrote an article about the project's lead researcher. The human genome project was new at one point in time before it became notable- so why wouldnt the liposarcoma genome project be credible? It is the same exact premise- basic research and an understanding of the epigentics of liposarcoma, an incredibly rare soft tissue cancer. It is an incredible shame that the wiki page was denied because how else are people going to be able to learn about this lifesaving research that is currently happening by some of the most brilliant minds in cancer research at MGH/Harvard/MIT/Broad Institute. How can we fix this?
Ead345 ( talk) 01:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. First of all, thanks for the review. It seems there is a huge pile of submissions and you do a great job reading all these drafts.
Secondly, thanks for understanding. It's frustrating indeed to have a draft declined.
You said I should find sources and provided some links to start with. As I know from communication with another reviewer it's okay if the sources belong to the same country as the subject of an article. So if the subject has the good coverage in Russian sources, it's enough. Is it correct?
Please comment on these sources.
Antonzaitsev ( talk) 20:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
"Topface: For championing a local, online dating scene."
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Thanks for reviewing my article on Nimble Commander! You rejected it for notability reasons. I respectfully disagree and here is my argumentation that I hope you find reasonable:
Wikipedia's notability guidelines state that "a computer program can usually be presumed to be notable if it is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field [...]".
Of the four sources I used, the first two ( Softpedia and MacTech) are well-known websites/journals in the Mac software domain that both have their own Wikipedia articles. The third is a well-known tech blog (lifehacker.ru). The fourth is a recommendation by the author of the golden standard file manager of the last two decades ( Total Commander).
Objectively, the quality of these sources is at least equivalent to the ones used in the acticles of Nimble Commander's direct competitors, all dual-pane file managers for macOS:
Please take 2 minutes and see for yourself. Take Fman for example: In its Reception section, it cites three sources. The first is Softpedia, like I did in my article. The only difference is that Fman was rated 3/5 and Nimble Commander received a 5/5 rating. The second source is a journal, comparable to MacTech which I cited. The third is ProductHunt, a product launch website where everybody can post their product without any peer-review.
Please help me understand in detail why you rejected the article - and please don't be like the last reviewer who ignored and deleted my post twice without an answer. Help me add a good article for a popular piece of software - thanks! :)
Abmnn ( talk) 14:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Why did you delete Angola at major beauty pageants? You know what delete also countries at major beauty pageants.
T4mb4y 22 ( talk) 00:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Outreach and Invitations:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.New Year New Page Review Drive
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Is there any chance you could please close the move discussion at Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in Austria and move the page per WP:SNOWBALL? Thanks. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 02:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure how you got a "no consensus" from Talk:Victoria (TV series)#Requested move 28 November 2017. There is clear consensus to move, with a couple of editors thinking that the discussion should be put on hold. However, they are in the minority. -- wooden superman 13:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I have to come by and say that your recent RM close at Cheryl (singer) is one of, if not the, finest and best written, well analyzed, and carefully explained closer statements I've seen here. Thank you. And you actually used a reading of the article itself in your consideration, which in my opinion should be done in most if not all RMs. I wish you had closed some of the ones I thought were incorrect, because a couple of crucial times the closer studied the issues involved, became familiar with the long statements and analysis offered up for evidentially purposes and then carefully debated in different styles by opposing good-faith editors, read some of the article itself, and then wrote and posted the close, all in less than two minutes. I will save and point to the wording of your Cheryl (singer) close as an example. Thanks again. Randy Kryn ( talk) 15:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Victoria (TV series). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. -- wooden superman 15:19, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
If I want to find an experienced editor who can speak Russian, what should I do first? Answering your question: it's all translated of course. If there was another independent source, I would cite it. Antonzaitsev ( talk) 08:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
Thank you for your review time. I was not sure whether I should have added any more information about Scandinavian Development Services (SDS) without sounding too subjective. However, in terms of notability, SDS is a leading scandinavian consultancy within life science industry in Scandinavia. SDS featured in "Dagens Industri" [1]. Dagens Industri is a financial newspaper in tabloid format published in Stockholm, Sweden [2]. Would this be enough source for notability?
Kind regards,
Nurgul B ( talk) 14:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Nurgul B
References
Hi there! Why did you delete my article for Angola at major beauty pageants? Well if that is the case delete all the Countries at major beauty pageant then...
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Reba McEntire. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm not necessarily requesting a re-review just yet, but I am getting ready to edit this further so I can submit again. Can you further elaborate on why the submission was denied in regard to the following, "...and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed." The sources I list do not come from the subject or the subject's company. All those I have listed are external sources. Do you have recommendations on how I could make this better? I apologize if I haven't used the talk page correctly. I've only created a couple articles and never really used the talk page before.
Thank you!
Abrobo819 (
talk) 19:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
Thank you for reviewing my article. I would really like some suggestions as to how to make this article better as I have been trying for a long time to find new references and improve it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Please revert your page move of "Annaea gens" to "Annaea". There was clearly no consensus in favour of this move. The proposal was to move the page to "Annaea (gens)", and there was no consensus for that. The proposal to move to a different title, "Annaea", was made less than three hours before the page was moved there. Nobody else agreed to that move; the only reply to it objected to that move. The move makes the page inconsistent with every other article about a Roman gens; since 2009 all new or updated articles on Roman gentes have used the same title format, with the only difference being whether "gens" is in parentheses. And as stated, had the issue of some editors moving pages to remove what they considered "unnecessary disambiguation" been known when the project began, none of them would have had parentheses; parentheses are unnecessary. However, "gens" is.
The reason is because all Roman women shared their names with the gentes to which they belonged. Every woman in the Julia gens was named "Julia", every woman in the Manlia gens was named "Manlia". Added to which, many gentes also shared their names with Roman tribes, wards, or towns. While not all of these currently have their own articles, the fact that every gens shares its name with at least one of these creates a distinct need for specificity and consistency. To say nothing of the fact that naturalists since the 18th century have borrowed the names of Roman gentes to describe spiders, butterflies, lizards, mushrooms, etc. The move was proposed by someone who is not a member of or apparently familiar with the conventions of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, and who did not obtain anything approaching consensus for the move. Therefore, I respectfully request that the page be returned to its previous title, or at least the original proposed title (which is where it was created in the first place). P Aculeius ( talk) 05:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''
. Also, from a consistency perspective, the
disambiguation guidelines would suggest that this article should actually be at
Annaea gens or
Annaea, but not at
Annaea (gens) as that is an unnecessary disambiguation. This would be more consistent with everything else on Wikipedia.
Brad
v 13:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Hi there,
Thanks for the quick review - I was expecting to have to wait a couple of months before hearing anything back :)
I can see the page was declined, I think due to lack of citations, correct? There are many other articles about Wrongworld that exist, but I checked through the list of gaming press websites that Wikipedia classes as important/usable, and I couldn't find the websites in question listed, so I left them out of the article.
Do I just need to wait until the game is noticed by some of the larger press sites, then add those citations to the article? Just want to make sure there isn't anything else that's causing a problem, and it's just the lack of coverage from large press sites that's the issue.
Thanks, Jamie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sludj ( talk • contribs) 05:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Bradv!
Prince Michael of Sealand has received a lot more attention and individual press since 2010. Not trying to be contrary or difficult. I also didn't realize there was an old AFD performed. But with the press he's gotten and the multiple times he's mentioned and written about on WP, I think rather than keeping a redirect the best way to go about getting rid of the article is an AFD if you don't agree with it. Interested to hear your thoughts. Hope you're well. -- Kbabej ( talk) 21:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, how do I see the article reviewed by a group of Wikipedians?-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article to submit it for review. Before you do that though, can you please explain the difference between this article and
Via Crucis to the Cruz del Campo? Why not contribute to that article instead?
Brad
v 04:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Are two different articles, one is about a stations of the cross I mean a pilgrimage route "that ends in the building of that article that I am creating", and the other article of the building itself, do you understand me?-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
it's as if you were saying that the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela should not have an article because the Camino de Santiago already exists-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
sorry, but now I have to wait more than 2 months for such an obvious thing, good thanks-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Bradv. Thanks for reviewing the article quoted on headline. The template you left calls for more sources; Could you please tell me what exactly needs to be sourced in the text? Thanks in advance. -- Morgoko ( talk) 13:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of UAE Arabian Gulf League. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Bijanii ( talk) 07:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017–18 Iranian protests. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
I joined UiPath Inc., several months ago and I have tried to submit our company for a page on Wikipedia. We are a $50 million revenue company with 600+ customers including GE, Pepsi, HP, Wells Fargo, the UK Home Office, NASA and so on. I have tried to simplify the submission but it sounds like there may be a history here where UiPath is "blacklisted" of sorts. Can you please help guide me?
Thank you. Bobby.patrick@uipath.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by T patrick VA ( talk • contribs) 13:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv. As recommended in your template, I've added several sources in the article quoted on headline, with more up-to-date info; if ok, please remove the template, otherwise kindly tell me what to do next to improve the content. Thanks in advance. -- Morgoko ( talk) 15:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv. I am writing about the draft biography on Jugnoo Rahi. Publication was declined because of inadequate notability of the subject. I understand that strict application of the guidelines might make the subject borderline for eligibility. However, I am very worried that these standards are being applied unevenly across the piece. There are many pages that show far less "significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Wikipedia appears unequal in its treatment of women compared to men. There are 29 women and 590 men in the category of Ophthalmologists. I do not believe that less than 5% of the notable ophthalmologists are women. The unfortunate effect of the current situation is that Wikipedia appears institutionally biassed against women, even though I am sure this is unintended. Timlev37 ( talk) 19:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Bradv. Thanks for reviewing my page. Can you tell me what you think I need to add in order to make the page publishable?
Thanks!
Seriouskind ( talk) 02:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The cite you restored is a gossip column, with a probable COI pesence on Wiki. Anmccaff ( talk) 04:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv! Still related to your recommendations, the second section of the article mentioned on headline has been improved ("Other GPLA Prizes"), with new sources and more fresh info, in addition to the changes I've done in my last edit (see my previous post on this page). Hope this will be enough to get your template removed, otherwise, kindly tell me what is still to be done to improve that page. Thanks in advance. -- Morgoko ( talk) 20:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pink tide. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 18:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bradv. I want to ask in what areas I should improve this article draft? I've read the notability guidelines and am convinced this person fits the criteria. Nikolas is Canada's most in-demand futurist, which is a very in-vogue profession that is helping businesses, thought leaders and politicians get to grips with technology and its future impact on society, work and culture. If it is citations where the submission is weak, I will attempt to redo and link to more respected links. Nikolas has appeared on many news stations recently (TV and radio) throughout Canada and I could link to these. He also created a '2018 Trends Report' that is being mentioned a lot in the media. I could also delete some of the history of Nikolas if this is less important? Before starting the rewrite, I would like a few more guidelines to help me. MrVanDigital ( talk) 19:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
About a year ago I submitted a draft on the West End actress Jill Martin (1938-2016).
The draft was not accepted for a number of reasons and I did not make any furter efforts to get it published on Wikipedia. But I was able to get her obituary published both at The Telegraph and The Times.
I today noticed that on the Italian Wikipedia there is actually a piece on Jill Martin, written in italian language. Would it be possible to get this piece published in english on the english wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joergen Dragesaet ( talk • contribs) 16:21, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with editing the article on Futurist, Nikolas Badminton. I've resubmitted after fixing issues you mentioned. I also had a question about citations I can't seem to find the answer for. Can you use websites like Meetup and Eventbrite as sources? Or does it depend on who organizes the meetup/event? Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrVanDigital ( talk • contribs) 18:48, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
Thank You | ||
Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 05:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |
I think you closed this discussion way too fast. There is I think no doubt that the current article name is wrong, and the discussion is simply slow. (There was only one response, which was not fully in disagreement.) We will never be able to complete a discussion this fast on a subject like this. Please advise whether we now need to restart? (But at this rate discussions will need to be restarted every week for several months before we get a decision!)-- Andrew Lancaster ( talk) 07:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James D. Zirin. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv,
I see you recently voted to delete my wiki entry "Brian Cliette" for lack on nobility ,I think this was a mistake as he has over 7 media mentions and interviews in top online outlets ( entrepreneur.com, The Huffington Post, Business.com, Influencive.com..etc) you can see the following google news results for "Brian Cliette" in the link below https://www.google.com/search?biw=2560&bih=1366&tbm=nws&ei=oLN2WoTDHbDs5gLmvpSIBA&q=%22brian+cliette%22
Please advise.
Thanks for your time and consideration,
Carla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writewords44 ( talk • contribs) 07:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
199.111.219.110 ( talk) 08:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shin Dong-hyuk. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv,
I've changed the first part of the "Michael Tojner"-Draft and would be glad if you could check it once more. Best whishes, Shipyardworker.18:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Shipyardworker ( talk)
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 12:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
Hello, Bradv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aydin Aghdashloo. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
I intend to have "Yee" reviewed. German Gamer 77 21:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
hello Bradv,
So this page exists on other countries wikipedia pages. Why is this being rejected for the usa when it has credible sources, links to publications and international album release reviews, the all music guide, Kerrang, metal hammer,etc.
What needs to be done to finally get this up for good? This is a group who have sold well, toured and had major album releases since 1988. Any help would be so appreciated. Dirkworld ( talk) 02:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Why did you reverse the Rojava-related articles that I moved? I thought I had followed the guidelines, I waited a week and there was pretty much consensus on the talk pages. The only one who opposed misunderstood the sources, which I explained to him but he didn't respond much to that. So I thought that according to the regulations regarding moves ("Consensus is determined not just by considering the preferences of the participants in a given discussion, but also by evaluating their arguments, assigning due weight accordingly..") that it would be valid for me to move them. AntonSamuel ( talk) 13:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Dear Bradv,
As suggested by you, changes has been made in the reference section. The blog references has been replaced with authentic book references.
This article is very important piece of history, which is missing now. Please check Wikipedia page on Battle of Chinhat for more reference on Barkat Ahmad.
Umair ( talk) 03:03, 6 December 2017 (IST)
According to the current draft of Wikipedia:Names of articles on recent events, first sentence, "There is no consensus" on article naming. We are keeping track of the results of RMs like this one to help establish consensus over time. Thus having a closure for or against based on the arguments would be helpful. Even if the close is "no consensus -> default to current name with date". -- Green C 02:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
Sorry to interrupt you but I found that my article was declined for the reason of liking an advertisement. However, I refer to some independent, reliable, published sources to write this. It's really confused. Would you mind to help me?
Thanks Enyce — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enycez99 ( talk • contribs) 02:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Have submitted the link where it defines notability and reason why award was given. Please see newly added link with details. As its been awarded in 2011 there are few archives available at this point and this is one of them, which defines notability. I also chatted on wiki and got it confirmed. Please recheck.
[1] — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Brutesin (
talk •
contribs) 06:28, February 21, 2017 (UTC)
References
Hi Bradv- I would love some assistance with the Liposarcoma Genome Project page. Liposarcoma is a rare cancer and thus not a great deal has been published about it. But how can people learn about rare cancers if the wikipedia page is denied due to insufficient sources. When the Director of the National Institute of Health posts an article about the lead liposarcoma genome project researcher at MGH/Harvard/Broad Institute, Bradley Bernstein,well what more evidence is needed to give this cancer credibility? I would like help please. Thank you. Ead345 ( talk) 01:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)EAD345
Hi Bradv- I am unclear why the liposarcoma genome project was denied. The articles listed were incredibly notable- the Director of the National Institute of Health just wrote an article about the project's lead researcher. The human genome project was new at one point in time before it became notable- so why wouldnt the liposarcoma genome project be credible? It is the same exact premise- basic research and an understanding of the epigentics of liposarcoma, an incredibly rare soft tissue cancer. It is an incredible shame that the wiki page was denied because how else are people going to be able to learn about this lifesaving research that is currently happening by some of the most brilliant minds in cancer research at MGH/Harvard/MIT/Broad Institute. How can we fix this?
Ead345 ( talk) 01:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. First of all, thanks for the review. It seems there is a huge pile of submissions and you do a great job reading all these drafts.
Secondly, thanks for understanding. It's frustrating indeed to have a draft declined.
You said I should find sources and provided some links to start with. As I know from communication with another reviewer it's okay if the sources belong to the same country as the subject of an article. So if the subject has the good coverage in Russian sources, it's enough. Is it correct?
Please comment on these sources.
Antonzaitsev ( talk) 20:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
"Topface: For championing a local, online dating scene."
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Thanks for reviewing my article on Nimble Commander! You rejected it for notability reasons. I respectfully disagree and here is my argumentation that I hope you find reasonable:
Wikipedia's notability guidelines state that "a computer program can usually be presumed to be notable if it is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field [...]".
Of the four sources I used, the first two ( Softpedia and MacTech) are well-known websites/journals in the Mac software domain that both have their own Wikipedia articles. The third is a well-known tech blog (lifehacker.ru). The fourth is a recommendation by the author of the golden standard file manager of the last two decades ( Total Commander).
Objectively, the quality of these sources is at least equivalent to the ones used in the acticles of Nimble Commander's direct competitors, all dual-pane file managers for macOS:
Please take 2 minutes and see for yourself. Take Fman for example: In its Reception section, it cites three sources. The first is Softpedia, like I did in my article. The only difference is that Fman was rated 3/5 and Nimble Commander received a 5/5 rating. The second source is a journal, comparable to MacTech which I cited. The third is ProductHunt, a product launch website where everybody can post their product without any peer-review.
Please help me understand in detail why you rejected the article - and please don't be like the last reviewer who ignored and deleted my post twice without an answer. Help me add a good article for a popular piece of software - thanks! :)
Abmnn ( talk) 14:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Why did you delete Angola at major beauty pageants? You know what delete also countries at major beauty pageants.
T4mb4y 22 ( talk) 00:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Outreach and Invitations:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.New Year New Page Review Drive
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Is there any chance you could please close the move discussion at Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in Austria and move the page per WP:SNOWBALL? Thanks. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 02:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure how you got a "no consensus" from Talk:Victoria (TV series)#Requested move 28 November 2017. There is clear consensus to move, with a couple of editors thinking that the discussion should be put on hold. However, they are in the minority. -- wooden superman 13:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I have to come by and say that your recent RM close at Cheryl (singer) is one of, if not the, finest and best written, well analyzed, and carefully explained closer statements I've seen here. Thank you. And you actually used a reading of the article itself in your consideration, which in my opinion should be done in most if not all RMs. I wish you had closed some of the ones I thought were incorrect, because a couple of crucial times the closer studied the issues involved, became familiar with the long statements and analysis offered up for evidentially purposes and then carefully debated in different styles by opposing good-faith editors, read some of the article itself, and then wrote and posted the close, all in less than two minutes. I will save and point to the wording of your Cheryl (singer) close as an example. Thanks again. Randy Kryn ( talk) 15:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Victoria (TV series). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. -- wooden superman 15:19, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
If I want to find an experienced editor who can speak Russian, what should I do first? Answering your question: it's all translated of course. If there was another independent source, I would cite it. Antonzaitsev ( talk) 08:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
Thank you for your review time. I was not sure whether I should have added any more information about Scandinavian Development Services (SDS) without sounding too subjective. However, in terms of notability, SDS is a leading scandinavian consultancy within life science industry in Scandinavia. SDS featured in "Dagens Industri" [1]. Dagens Industri is a financial newspaper in tabloid format published in Stockholm, Sweden [2]. Would this be enough source for notability?
Kind regards,
Nurgul B ( talk) 14:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Nurgul B
References
Hi there! Why did you delete my article for Angola at major beauty pageants? Well if that is the case delete all the Countries at major beauty pageant then...
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Reba McEntire. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm not necessarily requesting a re-review just yet, but I am getting ready to edit this further so I can submit again. Can you further elaborate on why the submission was denied in regard to the following, "...and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed." The sources I list do not come from the subject or the subject's company. All those I have listed are external sources. Do you have recommendations on how I could make this better? I apologize if I haven't used the talk page correctly. I've only created a couple articles and never really used the talk page before.
Thank you!
Abrobo819 (
talk) 19:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
Thank you for reviewing my article. I would really like some suggestions as to how to make this article better as I have been trying for a long time to find new references and improve it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Please revert your page move of "Annaea gens" to "Annaea". There was clearly no consensus in favour of this move. The proposal was to move the page to "Annaea (gens)", and there was no consensus for that. The proposal to move to a different title, "Annaea", was made less than three hours before the page was moved there. Nobody else agreed to that move; the only reply to it objected to that move. The move makes the page inconsistent with every other article about a Roman gens; since 2009 all new or updated articles on Roman gentes have used the same title format, with the only difference being whether "gens" is in parentheses. And as stated, had the issue of some editors moving pages to remove what they considered "unnecessary disambiguation" been known when the project began, none of them would have had parentheses; parentheses are unnecessary. However, "gens" is.
The reason is because all Roman women shared their names with the gentes to which they belonged. Every woman in the Julia gens was named "Julia", every woman in the Manlia gens was named "Manlia". Added to which, many gentes also shared their names with Roman tribes, wards, or towns. While not all of these currently have their own articles, the fact that every gens shares its name with at least one of these creates a distinct need for specificity and consistency. To say nothing of the fact that naturalists since the 18th century have borrowed the names of Roman gentes to describe spiders, butterflies, lizards, mushrooms, etc. The move was proposed by someone who is not a member of or apparently familiar with the conventions of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, and who did not obtain anything approaching consensus for the move. Therefore, I respectfully request that the page be returned to its previous title, or at least the original proposed title (which is where it was created in the first place). P Aculeius ( talk) 05:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''
. Also, from a consistency perspective, the
disambiguation guidelines would suggest that this article should actually be at
Annaea gens or
Annaea, but not at
Annaea (gens) as that is an unnecessary disambiguation. This would be more consistent with everything else on Wikipedia.
Brad
v 13:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Hi there,
Thanks for the quick review - I was expecting to have to wait a couple of months before hearing anything back :)
I can see the page was declined, I think due to lack of citations, correct? There are many other articles about Wrongworld that exist, but I checked through the list of gaming press websites that Wikipedia classes as important/usable, and I couldn't find the websites in question listed, so I left them out of the article.
Do I just need to wait until the game is noticed by some of the larger press sites, then add those citations to the article? Just want to make sure there isn't anything else that's causing a problem, and it's just the lack of coverage from large press sites that's the issue.
Thanks, Jamie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sludj ( talk • contribs) 05:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Bradv!
Prince Michael of Sealand has received a lot more attention and individual press since 2010. Not trying to be contrary or difficult. I also didn't realize there was an old AFD performed. But with the press he's gotten and the multiple times he's mentioned and written about on WP, I think rather than keeping a redirect the best way to go about getting rid of the article is an AFD if you don't agree with it. Interested to hear your thoughts. Hope you're well. -- Kbabej ( talk) 21:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, how do I see the article reviewed by a group of Wikipedians?-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article to submit it for review. Before you do that though, can you please explain the difference between this article and
Via Crucis to the Cruz del Campo? Why not contribute to that article instead?
Brad
v 04:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Are two different articles, one is about a stations of the cross I mean a pilgrimage route "that ends in the building of that article that I am creating", and the other article of the building itself, do you understand me?-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
it's as if you were saying that the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela should not have an article because the Camino de Santiago already exists-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
sorry, but now I have to wait more than 2 months for such an obvious thing, good thanks-- ILoveCaracas ( talk) 04:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Bradv. Thanks for reviewing the article quoted on headline. The template you left calls for more sources; Could you please tell me what exactly needs to be sourced in the text? Thanks in advance. -- Morgoko ( talk) 13:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of UAE Arabian Gulf League. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Bijanii ( talk) 07:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017–18 Iranian protests. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bradv,
I joined UiPath Inc., several months ago and I have tried to submit our company for a page on Wikipedia. We are a $50 million revenue company with 600+ customers including GE, Pepsi, HP, Wells Fargo, the UK Home Office, NASA and so on. I have tried to simplify the submission but it sounds like there may be a history here where UiPath is "blacklisted" of sorts. Can you please help guide me?
Thank you. Bobby.patrick@uipath.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by T patrick VA ( talk • contribs) 13:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv. As recommended in your template, I've added several sources in the article quoted on headline, with more up-to-date info; if ok, please remove the template, otherwise kindly tell me what to do next to improve the content. Thanks in advance. -- Morgoko ( talk) 15:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv. I am writing about the draft biography on Jugnoo Rahi. Publication was declined because of inadequate notability of the subject. I understand that strict application of the guidelines might make the subject borderline for eligibility. However, I am very worried that these standards are being applied unevenly across the piece. There are many pages that show far less "significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Wikipedia appears unequal in its treatment of women compared to men. There are 29 women and 590 men in the category of Ophthalmologists. I do not believe that less than 5% of the notable ophthalmologists are women. The unfortunate effect of the current situation is that Wikipedia appears institutionally biassed against women, even though I am sure this is unintended. Timlev37 ( talk) 19:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Bradv. Thanks for reviewing my page. Can you tell me what you think I need to add in order to make the page publishable?
Thanks!
Seriouskind ( talk) 02:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The cite you restored is a gossip column, with a probable COI pesence on Wiki. Anmccaff ( talk) 04:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv! Still related to your recommendations, the second section of the article mentioned on headline has been improved ("Other GPLA Prizes"), with new sources and more fresh info, in addition to the changes I've done in my last edit (see my previous post on this page). Hope this will be enough to get your template removed, otherwise, kindly tell me what is still to be done to improve that page. Thanks in advance. -- Morgoko ( talk) 20:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pink tide. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 18:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bradv. I want to ask in what areas I should improve this article draft? I've read the notability guidelines and am convinced this person fits the criteria. Nikolas is Canada's most in-demand futurist, which is a very in-vogue profession that is helping businesses, thought leaders and politicians get to grips with technology and its future impact on society, work and culture. If it is citations where the submission is weak, I will attempt to redo and link to more respected links. Nikolas has appeared on many news stations recently (TV and radio) throughout Canada and I could link to these. He also created a '2018 Trends Report' that is being mentioned a lot in the media. I could also delete some of the history of Nikolas if this is less important? Before starting the rewrite, I would like a few more guidelines to help me. MrVanDigital ( talk) 19:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
About a year ago I submitted a draft on the West End actress Jill Martin (1938-2016).
The draft was not accepted for a number of reasons and I did not make any furter efforts to get it published on Wikipedia. But I was able to get her obituary published both at The Telegraph and The Times.
I today noticed that on the Italian Wikipedia there is actually a piece on Jill Martin, written in italian language. Would it be possible to get this piece published in english on the english wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joergen Dragesaet ( talk • contribs) 16:21, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with editing the article on Futurist, Nikolas Badminton. I've resubmitted after fixing issues you mentioned. I also had a question about citations I can't seem to find the answer for. Can you use websites like Meetup and Eventbrite as sources? Or does it depend on who organizes the meetup/event? Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrVanDigital ( talk • contribs) 18:48, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
Thank You | ||
Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 05:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |
I think you closed this discussion way too fast. There is I think no doubt that the current article name is wrong, and the discussion is simply slow. (There was only one response, which was not fully in disagreement.) We will never be able to complete a discussion this fast on a subject like this. Please advise whether we now need to restart? (But at this rate discussions will need to be restarted every week for several months before we get a decision!)-- Andrew Lancaster ( talk) 07:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James D. Zirin. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv,
I see you recently voted to delete my wiki entry "Brian Cliette" for lack on nobility ,I think this was a mistake as he has over 7 media mentions and interviews in top online outlets ( entrepreneur.com, The Huffington Post, Business.com, Influencive.com..etc) you can see the following google news results for "Brian Cliette" in the link below https://www.google.com/search?biw=2560&bih=1366&tbm=nws&ei=oLN2WoTDHbDs5gLmvpSIBA&q=%22brian+cliette%22
Please advise.
Thanks for your time and consideration,
Carla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writewords44 ( talk • contribs) 07:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
199.111.219.110 ( talk) 08:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shin Dong-hyuk. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Bradv,
I've changed the first part of the "Michael Tojner"-Draft and would be glad if you could check it once more. Best whishes, Shipyardworker.18:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Shipyardworker ( talk)
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 12:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.