This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Bibeyjj! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being " adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 16:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This may be notable, but the main issue is the sources, in that they should be WP:INDEPENDENT of the topic, and should be WP:RELIABLE (Wikipedia is not a reliable source)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ave Maria (Stopford) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{( spin me / revolutions)} 17:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Bibeyjj, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ave Maria (Stopford), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Bibeyjj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Ave Maria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 18:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Now You See Me (McGeorge novel). Thanks! Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs referenced summaries of reviews in WP:Reliable sources by professional critics. The reviews by the public are not permitted as content or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Now You See Me (McGeorge novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Now You See Me (McGeorge novel), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This doesn't seem to have received the needed coverage as far as I can tell, as I tried looking for sourcing. It's possible I could have missed something so I'm not completely rejecting it just in case. My recommendation for the time being is to look for coverage for the author as a whole (book reviews, news articles about him, etc) and see if there's enough to justify an article for the author. It's sadly fairly common for books to not receive enough coverage to pass NBOOK even when they're published through a mainstream publisher. The good news is that sometimes there can be enough total reviews and coverage for an author's work for there to justify an author article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Now You See Me (McGeorge novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Now You See Me (McGeorge novel), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CUBRIC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Elizabeth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St David's Catholic College, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Urban and AS-level.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of St. David's Catholic Sixth Form College, Cardiff.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metabotropic receptor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chemical messenger.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, here are a few relevant things:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages!

Tom (LT) (
talk) 22:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Looking forward to working with you on this GA nomination. David notMD ( talk) 13:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Milk allergy and Egg allergy were previously raised to GA. Given that Fish allergy was modeled after those when created and when proposed for GA, I intend to incorporate text and ref improvements achieved in Fish allergy back into the source articles. David notMD ( talk) 03:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ulnar styloid process, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radioulnar ligament.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crown (anatomy) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MeegsC -- MeegsC ( talk) 17:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Joseph's Church, Cardiff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi James: Just a quick note to say I appreciate all the efforts you've put into improving the crown (anatomy) article; you've been very easy to work with! I'll keep my eye open for any references I can find to help flesh out the non-human part of the article. MeegsC ( talk) 12:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Left colic artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ligation.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bibeyjj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Now You See Me".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Greetings,

Please do visit Draft:Irrational beliefs and help expand the same if you find interested in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku ( talk) 13:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Middle genicular artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lateral genicular artery.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Crown (anatomy) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Crown (anatomy) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MeegsC -- MeegsC ( talk) 12:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Crown (anatomy) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Crown (anatomy) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MeegsC -- MeegsC ( talk) 12:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Bibeyjj. Certainly! I removed the comma before "and is still one of the more preferred methods" because "is still one of the more preferred methods" is not an independent clause; it cannot stand alone as a sentence. JustAMuggle ( talk) 03:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Laddering (policing), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 17:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Dramas are not a factual reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laddering (policing) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laddering (policing), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 18:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bibeyjj! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic ( talk) 18:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dorsal scapular nerve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mosby.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uhthoff's phenomenon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

I just saw your edit-summary in Special:Diff/1025752531. About a week ago, I fixed the query the bot uses so it shouldn't untag pages at RfD anymore. Sorry about the annoying edits while the bug was active. Vahurzpu ( talk) 22:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for resolving this Vahurzpu! Bibeyjj ( talk) 08:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Catherine Ennis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy ( talk) 16:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

I very much appreciate your kind words supporting my run. Please support me further by letting me know if I'm making a mess. Or if you just need help. Thanks in any case. BusterD ( talk) 15:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan Rees (composer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bibeyjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laddering (policing), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Superior rectus muscle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intermuscular septum.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bibeyjj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Laddering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Choanal atresia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypoxia.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Primo Dorello, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Padavalam🌂  ►  15:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

In this edit: (a) there seems no point in suggesting she should sort on any different name from the one used in the article, and (b) why do you think she doesn't need a discography? (Compare the German version - or in fact the text of the deleted article, from which I intend to reconstruct her extensive discography). Pam D 13:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi PamD! In general, I include middle names, but this is not required and can be removed if felt appropriate. Especially with an uncommon surname such as "Parker-Smith", it is just a minor detail to include middle names for categorisation only (and not for the article name). Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment doesn't actually give any guidance on the "discography" parameter, and my interpretation has been that it means "a recording of the musician or piece included in the article". I may be wrong there. As such, I completely agree that a list of discography would be good, but simply meant that a recording of such discography is likely not appropriate (or legal considering how recently she died). Thanks! Bibeyjj ( talk) 13:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Surely a discography is a listing of her recordings, like a filmography is a list of her films or a bibliography a list of her publications (except that we use "Selected publications" instead to avoid confusion with the list of sources). Nothing to do with copyright. I don't think a "discography" is a recording. Pam D 13:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines#Discography_section. Pam D 13:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi PamD! You're correct on the use of "discography" in Template:WikiProject Biography as defined by Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines#Discography_section. I will consider it in future. Perhaps I should ask for clarification of language on Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment, as I only applied the "discography" assessment to Template:WikiProject Biography. Bibeyjj ( talk) 13:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

See also MOS:BIB, if you're suggesting that this usage is distinctive to one Wikiproject. Pam D 13:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bibeyjj! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Hematemesis that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham ( talk) 23:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kj cheetham! Thanks for letting me know. Surprised I've gone this far in Wikipedia without really knowing what a minor edit is! I'll watch out for this in future. Thanks. Bibeyjj ( talk) 08:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

		The Surreal Barnstar
		I just noticed that you answered a request that I made... THIRTEEN YEARS LATER. That's amazing! ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_PipeOrgan#Aeolian-Skinner) -Philippe ( talk) 18:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

-Philippe ( talk) 18:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For being nice to others. دَستخَط، اِفلاق (کَتھ باتھ) 14:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating the article Myostation inhibitors for deletion. I was not familiar on how to delete that page since it was a typo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabbobler ( talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your userpage claims that you are employed by the Wikimedia Foundation, but I don't find your name on the official staff list. Maybe an error when you updated the template? WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi WhatamIdoing! Thanks for pointing this out - I can't remember if it added that automatically or if the template suggested that it be added, but you are absolutely right that I don't work for the Wikimedia Foundation so it was placed incorrectly. I've just fixed this. Thanks! Bibeyjj ( talk) 21:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

It looks like you still have this bit: "Disclaimer: I provide services to the Wikimedia Foundation. The Foundation does not vet all of my activities, edits, statements, or other contributions. These views may not reflect the views of the Foundation." WhatamIdoing ( talk) 00:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Does anyone know how to get this corrected? 2600:387:F:4411:0:0:0:B ( talk) 14:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Calgary-Cambridge model, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend ( talk) 11:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Price-Jones curve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—  The Most Comfortable  Chair 20:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. ( t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Bibeyjj

Thank you for creating Price-Jones curve.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Bibeyjj,

Thank you for the application to join WikiJournal of Medicine as an associate editor. I am sorry we've been very busy with submissions and other journal administration that we haven't had the time to look at applications for some time. On the other hand, it shows that we do need assistance with this project, and as it seems from votes so far we'd be happy to have you join us. Are you still interested? Also, if elected, would you be willing to help out for instance in finding peer reviewers for article submissions to the journal?

Best regards,

Mikael Häggström ( talk) 15:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Editor-in-chief, WikiJournal of Medicine

I have nominated Acute myeloid leukemia for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 04:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Bibeyjj. When you have a chance, if you could weigh in at Talk:Anxiolytic#Merging_from_Anti-anxiety_medication, I would appreciate it. Thanks! Doctormatt ( talk) 19:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of St. David's Catholic Sixth Form College, Cardiff.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)