This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
On 7 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Herman (Swaiko), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
HotSauceFrenchFries ( talk · contribs · count) Not heeding anything, it seems. - FlightTime ( open channel) 22:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I would like to Let you know that this ip (2402:800:62CD:2C4C:30A2:68F3:3D1D:2CBC) is evading a block that you put on 2402:800:62CD:C3BD:1033:6D1C:50CB:9CFA 2600:8801:FB00:1FD:507B:D79B:F:400E ( talk) 20:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thanks for actioning AIV so quickly, vandal patrollers appreciate you! Mr.weedle ( talk) 03:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, I would like to ask you if you could give permanent protection status to the following two articles: The Intercontinental Derby (football) and Fenerbahçe S.K. (football), since they are vandalised on a regular basis unfortunately. Thank you in advance. Kind regards Akocsg ( talk) 16:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm happy to hear that you have evacuated out of harms way, and I pray that your home and community make it through the storm unscathed. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 21:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Hi. It seems my IP range has been blocked by yourself until 2023-4-21 for vandalism. After some effort (newbie at this) I've found a list of edits made from within this IP range and I can see that a lot of these edits were inappropriate, however this range covers a huge number of Vodafone and Lebara mobile internet customers in the UK and seems a bit disproportionate. Not a major issue for myself as I can of course make edits once logged in, but was wondering if there's any way you could target more specifically the actual IPs involved. Appreciate that you have a lot on your plate so will understand if you don't have the time. Glad you've weathered the storm relatively unscathed Padd13ear ( talk) 21:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your hard work and contributions as an admin. TBH, I can't count how many warnings and blocks you have posted. Sarrail ( talk) 00:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, Ad Orientem. The SNL troll, who you last blocked in 2020 for 1 year, is now evading the block at Special:Contributions/24.129.175.215. Thanks. -- Wikipedical Wikipedical ( talk) 22:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. The same user just vandalized SNL pages again, waiting out a 3-year block of yours on another IP address. Please take a look when you're able to, thanks. Glad to read your latest storm update that you're safe. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 16:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I’ve posted my request to the administrator who issued the discretionary sanction notice. In summary, where may I find the review of my edit that resulted in its censorship and subsequent chilling notice? PursuingTruthNotPolitics ( talk) 01:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Why was this category Category:Professional wrestling jobbers deleted when it strongly kept before, it makes no sense. Could you please supply me with the people who were on this list. Davidgoodheart ( talk) 20:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
I work with a lot of Cambodians, many of them older immigrants. To a person they all voted for Trump for the sole reason that he was the furthest from communism and socialism. One of the women and I were discussing unusual food we've eaten, and she said she had eaten crickets and worms because the Khmer Rouge stole most of her village's food, and would kill anyone that stockpiled food. She then related, as anyone would discuss a story from her childhood, how her father and uncle were executed in front of her. She still won't eat rabbit though. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
I sent you one :) Generalrelative ( talk) 03:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem! Can you help me remember something? You blocked this user in August as a sock (for which thank you!), but I can't recall his other username, which you don't seem to have mentioned in your block summary. Do you happen to remember it by any chance? Many thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 08:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey, so I just signed up for Wikipedia 2 days ago and tried to edit today and it says you blocked my ip address but I never disrupted anything. Sooners01alt ( talk) 01:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
When I try to edit it says u blocked my ip Sooners01alt ( talk) 21:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Okay. Sorry I thought that my ip was blocked because my brother got blocked by u I think Sooners01alt ( talk) 01:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
In the discussion at now closed discussion at WP:In the news/Candidates#(Closed) Mass bombing of Ukrainian cities you had responded to my comment that this attack was unprecedented with:
I am assuming you have a very limited knowledge of the history of war. This is all SOP for Russia and the USSR in its various military campaigns. Wars where international law is respected are the exception, not the rule. This is all fairly mild stuff compared to what went on in WWII.
This comment seemed a bit condescending to me. I then asked:
Wow, that's unnecessarily pointy, User:Ad Orientem! Sure, worse horrors have happened in the history of warfare. But Russia isn't using artillery or aerial bombings here, where stuff misses, or aiming at a military target, and there's vast collateral damage. They are using very precise cruise missiles, such as the Kh-101 which is accurate within a few metres. As far as I know, the simultaneous use of 80+ precisely targeted cruise missiles, hitting civilian parks, city streets, office towers, and apartment buildings (and admittedly some power facilities), in a way to maximize civilian casualties, and then publicly admitting to having done it in revenge for attacks on a military supply line, is completely unprecedented. But as you must know more than I do about the use of such precise cruise missiles, User:Ad Orientem, perhaps you can remind me of what attack I have forgotten.
However the discussion was closed shortly afterwards before you had a chance to respond (or even see it I suspect).
My knowledge of war is pretty standard, but there must be something I'm ignorant of. To what previous event are you referring to, that I'm not aware of. Thanks, Nfitz ( talk) 20:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm one of maintainers of 5/3/2nm articles, and apparently editing of the 5 nm process article was disabled by you not long ago. Is it possible to either introduce exception for my IP range or re-enable editability, as by now the vandals might have moved on to other targets? After recent edits the article needs a bit of cleanup (remove duplicate ref etc). 188.66.32.155 ( talk) 10:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Ad Orientem. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 18:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Ad Orientem! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC) |
Look here to understand [1] and [2] 151.57.23.14 ( talk) 19:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey @ Ad Orientem hope you're well. I entirely reworked the Rita Ora discography article and brought it to a good standard, which I later nominated for a featured list status. The article is currently being reviewed and I assume that it will pass the nomination. Although edit warring has been going on over the article for a long time. Despite various warnings given on their talkpages and attempts to find a solution, @ Helptottt @ Jakubik.v are persistently removing well-sourced content and reverting without any plausible reasoning. Is it possible for you as an admin to intervene? Many thanks in advance. Iaof2017 ( talk) 19:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, but I hope you look into this issue in more detail. An editor (laof2017) has made a huge amount of questionable edits in the article and has, inexplicably, completely altered an already good article. Several other editors have pointed out the same thing in the revision history of the article and laof2017 has ignored it, undoing their edits each time. The editor in question, unfortunately, has a history of vindictive behavior towards other editors. Helptottt ( talk) 23:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi AO, hope you're doing well. As you blocked User:Myxxd a few years back, the Westlife-focused editor who routinely added paragraphs of unsourced material and expanded all their articles to a ridiculously overstuffed degree, I'm letting you know I think they've returned using both Johnnyrickes and Didimilk. They've attempted to re-format and expand Westlife discography. Not sure this suspicious behaviour is enough to block them both outright, but they have been exclusively focused since registering a short time ago, and that was Myxxd's entire focus (Johnnyrickes initially edited a few other pages then began focusing on Westlife topics). I think Didimilk is Johnnyrickes as they registered the day after Johnnyrickes stopped editing two weeks ago. Should the article be protected? Ss 112 12:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. You recently (20th October) blocked the IP user 119.94.169.84, who was systematically changing 'death' to 'assassination' on multiple articles, without references, etc. They're back now at a new IP, 119.94.166.70, and doing exactly the same. Have warned them. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 13:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hi. You banned this editor with a range block. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2A04:4A43:4D1F:E8DA:A10F:6729:ECA3:FC85 Not long afterwards, a new IP came back to one of their pages, with first edits that looks exactly like those of the banned IP. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.237.86 /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.233.101 /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.236.245
Then, not long after, a very similar IP indeed comes back again with a first edit, here:
/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.237.245
Seems like clear sockpuppetry. A new range block might be needed? Many thanks.
EDIT: I notice that the user Bastun notified you about ( /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/185.152.218.211) also edits the same pages, such as here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Islamic_view_of_the_Bible&action=history
NEDOCHAN ( talk) 10:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Richard Morton Jack is the Nick Drake estate authorized biographer of Nick Drake. No one, I repeat no one, has more accurate information on Nick Drake. Yet his edits were rejected. Nick Drake’s sister — the source of most of the corrections (The are thirteen unambiguous errors in the Wiki entry.) has always been disappointed in the errors.
Morton Jack’s Nick Drake biography will be released in 2023. Hopefully it can then be used as a source to correct the errors.
Meanwhile, this is just one of those cases where the admin got it wrong.
Hey — sometimes following all the rules gets a bad result — it happens. 201.142.197.156 ( talk) 23:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
First off, thank you for the quick response at AIV! I just wanted to ask though, (not being familiar with range blocks), will the one year block you added for that range also include 92.40.191.69? Because it's still only showing the 1 week block by another admin. Thanks again - wolf 04:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I only added "suspended" to the Overland Airways as, in theory the airline hasn't operated the route in a long time
Tunisair had also suspended the Cotonou route and remains so.
I noticed that Camair-Co do not operate flights into Cotonou anymore. A quick check on Flightmapper, as well as FlightRadar24 confirms that the airlines operating the sector are Air Senegal & Rwandair.
I'm not sure why I was blocked for Vandalism? Maybe we just delete the Tunisair, Overland Airways and the Camair-Co entries then.
Thanks. 86.17.128.215 ( talk) 22:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I have a screenshot showing I was blocked by Ad Orientem. How can I show that to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.128.215 ( talk) 09:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Given your stated biases, something like this is not okay. Please do not do that again. jps ( talk) 03:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't know if you want to hear from me any longer or not, but there are two things that I think you misinterpreted here: 1) I think the problem with your close was that it argued that religious belief is not under the remit of WP:FTN. However, it is. It just is. The fact that this argument aligns with a theistic conceit is why it seemed to me that this was a biased move. Of course, I cannot know your intent, which is why I pointe out that it was the appearance of bias that I was concerned about. But... rather more concerning to me was 2) the later realization that you thought this was an admin action (it had not occurred to me that you had considered it such until you intimated it above). This is a fundamental misapprehension of what it means to be an admin on WP. It strikes me as being officious, to be honest. That actually concerns me somewhat more than (what I considered to be) a poorly considered close. Not sure if you care about this explanation, but there it is. jps ( talk) 03:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
BangJan1999 19:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks so much for helping me revert edits from that IP, it was a pretty big mess. So much so that my computer literally blue screened with a memory ran out error from the amount of articles I had opened that they fucked up which like never happens lmao. Thanks again! Zekerocks11 ( talk) 23:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Morning, I see you're currently active, could you please consider actioning this request ? Thanx, - FlightTime ( open channel) 18:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
Ad, I love you. I love looking at my Watchlist and seeing "Ad Orientem has blocked yadayada" every single time. You are the best. You constantly keep that page clear like its a baby or something I don't know anymore. P.S. I will continue to try and make my block requests funny but legit at the same time to try and get you guys to laugh or to get you to roll your eyes in annoyance, whichever comes first. You have earned this one. Keep up the good work and keep getting those bastards that aren't here to build this place. Best, Zeke ( talk) 03:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I was watching the discussion at ANI and wanted to ask for an advice related to your closure.
What's a correct course of action in a situation when:
Should this be interpreted as a lack of consensus for deletion or lack of consensus for inclusion? What's the best course of action for editor B if they still disagree with the deletion? PaulT2022 ( talk) 01:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Ad we could use your help with the backlog right now for AIV. Vandals are pretty busy tonight.
Best, Zeke ( talk) 02:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Lmao dude they're Sandbox edits, like noone cares! 175.156.197.65 ( talk) 10:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Hi Brian K. Tyler, what is going on at the bottom of your talk page? I am posting this query here so as not to draw any attention from a certain IP who is probably watching your page. I can't figure out what they are up to. But what I am seeing feels like you are being trolled. If I am misreading this please let me know. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
On 7 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Herman (Swaiko), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
HotSauceFrenchFries ( talk · contribs · count) Not heeding anything, it seems. - FlightTime ( open channel) 22:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I would like to Let you know that this ip (2402:800:62CD:2C4C:30A2:68F3:3D1D:2CBC) is evading a block that you put on 2402:800:62CD:C3BD:1033:6D1C:50CB:9CFA 2600:8801:FB00:1FD:507B:D79B:F:400E ( talk) 20:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thanks for actioning AIV so quickly, vandal patrollers appreciate you! Mr.weedle ( talk) 03:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, I would like to ask you if you could give permanent protection status to the following two articles: The Intercontinental Derby (football) and Fenerbahçe S.K. (football), since they are vandalised on a regular basis unfortunately. Thank you in advance. Kind regards Akocsg ( talk) 16:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm happy to hear that you have evacuated out of harms way, and I pray that your home and community make it through the storm unscathed. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 21:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Hi. It seems my IP range has been blocked by yourself until 2023-4-21 for vandalism. After some effort (newbie at this) I've found a list of edits made from within this IP range and I can see that a lot of these edits were inappropriate, however this range covers a huge number of Vodafone and Lebara mobile internet customers in the UK and seems a bit disproportionate. Not a major issue for myself as I can of course make edits once logged in, but was wondering if there's any way you could target more specifically the actual IPs involved. Appreciate that you have a lot on your plate so will understand if you don't have the time. Glad you've weathered the storm relatively unscathed Padd13ear ( talk) 21:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your hard work and contributions as an admin. TBH, I can't count how many warnings and blocks you have posted. Sarrail ( talk) 00:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, Ad Orientem. The SNL troll, who you last blocked in 2020 for 1 year, is now evading the block at Special:Contributions/24.129.175.215. Thanks. -- Wikipedical Wikipedical ( talk) 22:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. The same user just vandalized SNL pages again, waiting out a 3-year block of yours on another IP address. Please take a look when you're able to, thanks. Glad to read your latest storm update that you're safe. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 16:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I’ve posted my request to the administrator who issued the discretionary sanction notice. In summary, where may I find the review of my edit that resulted in its censorship and subsequent chilling notice? PursuingTruthNotPolitics ( talk) 01:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Why was this category Category:Professional wrestling jobbers deleted when it strongly kept before, it makes no sense. Could you please supply me with the people who were on this list. Davidgoodheart ( talk) 20:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
I work with a lot of Cambodians, many of them older immigrants. To a person they all voted for Trump for the sole reason that he was the furthest from communism and socialism. One of the women and I were discussing unusual food we've eaten, and she said she had eaten crickets and worms because the Khmer Rouge stole most of her village's food, and would kill anyone that stockpiled food. She then related, as anyone would discuss a story from her childhood, how her father and uncle were executed in front of her. She still won't eat rabbit though. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
I sent you one :) Generalrelative ( talk) 03:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem! Can you help me remember something? You blocked this user in August as a sock (for which thank you!), but I can't recall his other username, which you don't seem to have mentioned in your block summary. Do you happen to remember it by any chance? Many thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 08:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey, so I just signed up for Wikipedia 2 days ago and tried to edit today and it says you blocked my ip address but I never disrupted anything. Sooners01alt ( talk) 01:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
When I try to edit it says u blocked my ip Sooners01alt ( talk) 21:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Okay. Sorry I thought that my ip was blocked because my brother got blocked by u I think Sooners01alt ( talk) 01:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
In the discussion at now closed discussion at WP:In the news/Candidates#(Closed) Mass bombing of Ukrainian cities you had responded to my comment that this attack was unprecedented with:
I am assuming you have a very limited knowledge of the history of war. This is all SOP for Russia and the USSR in its various military campaigns. Wars where international law is respected are the exception, not the rule. This is all fairly mild stuff compared to what went on in WWII.
This comment seemed a bit condescending to me. I then asked:
Wow, that's unnecessarily pointy, User:Ad Orientem! Sure, worse horrors have happened in the history of warfare. But Russia isn't using artillery or aerial bombings here, where stuff misses, or aiming at a military target, and there's vast collateral damage. They are using very precise cruise missiles, such as the Kh-101 which is accurate within a few metres. As far as I know, the simultaneous use of 80+ precisely targeted cruise missiles, hitting civilian parks, city streets, office towers, and apartment buildings (and admittedly some power facilities), in a way to maximize civilian casualties, and then publicly admitting to having done it in revenge for attacks on a military supply line, is completely unprecedented. But as you must know more than I do about the use of such precise cruise missiles, User:Ad Orientem, perhaps you can remind me of what attack I have forgotten.
However the discussion was closed shortly afterwards before you had a chance to respond (or even see it I suspect).
My knowledge of war is pretty standard, but there must be something I'm ignorant of. To what previous event are you referring to, that I'm not aware of. Thanks, Nfitz ( talk) 20:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm one of maintainers of 5/3/2nm articles, and apparently editing of the 5 nm process article was disabled by you not long ago. Is it possible to either introduce exception for my IP range or re-enable editability, as by now the vandals might have moved on to other targets? After recent edits the article needs a bit of cleanup (remove duplicate ref etc). 188.66.32.155 ( talk) 10:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Ad Orientem. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 18:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Ad Orientem! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC) |
Look here to understand [1] and [2] 151.57.23.14 ( talk) 19:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey @ Ad Orientem hope you're well. I entirely reworked the Rita Ora discography article and brought it to a good standard, which I later nominated for a featured list status. The article is currently being reviewed and I assume that it will pass the nomination. Although edit warring has been going on over the article for a long time. Despite various warnings given on their talkpages and attempts to find a solution, @ Helptottt @ Jakubik.v are persistently removing well-sourced content and reverting without any plausible reasoning. Is it possible for you as an admin to intervene? Many thanks in advance. Iaof2017 ( talk) 19:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, but I hope you look into this issue in more detail. An editor (laof2017) has made a huge amount of questionable edits in the article and has, inexplicably, completely altered an already good article. Several other editors have pointed out the same thing in the revision history of the article and laof2017 has ignored it, undoing their edits each time. The editor in question, unfortunately, has a history of vindictive behavior towards other editors. Helptottt ( talk) 23:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi AO, hope you're doing well. As you blocked User:Myxxd a few years back, the Westlife-focused editor who routinely added paragraphs of unsourced material and expanded all their articles to a ridiculously overstuffed degree, I'm letting you know I think they've returned using both Johnnyrickes and Didimilk. They've attempted to re-format and expand Westlife discography. Not sure this suspicious behaviour is enough to block them both outright, but they have been exclusively focused since registering a short time ago, and that was Myxxd's entire focus (Johnnyrickes initially edited a few other pages then began focusing on Westlife topics). I think Didimilk is Johnnyrickes as they registered the day after Johnnyrickes stopped editing two weeks ago. Should the article be protected? Ss 112 12:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. You recently (20th October) blocked the IP user 119.94.169.84, who was systematically changing 'death' to 'assassination' on multiple articles, without references, etc. They're back now at a new IP, 119.94.166.70, and doing exactly the same. Have warned them. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 13:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hi. You banned this editor with a range block. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2A04:4A43:4D1F:E8DA:A10F:6729:ECA3:FC85 Not long afterwards, a new IP came back to one of their pages, with first edits that looks exactly like those of the banned IP. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.237.86 /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.233.101 /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.236.245
Then, not long after, a very similar IP indeed comes back again with a first edit, here:
/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/86.187.237.245
Seems like clear sockpuppetry. A new range block might be needed? Many thanks.
EDIT: I notice that the user Bastun notified you about ( /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/185.152.218.211) also edits the same pages, such as here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Islamic_view_of_the_Bible&action=history
NEDOCHAN ( talk) 10:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Richard Morton Jack is the Nick Drake estate authorized biographer of Nick Drake. No one, I repeat no one, has more accurate information on Nick Drake. Yet his edits were rejected. Nick Drake’s sister — the source of most of the corrections (The are thirteen unambiguous errors in the Wiki entry.) has always been disappointed in the errors.
Morton Jack’s Nick Drake biography will be released in 2023. Hopefully it can then be used as a source to correct the errors.
Meanwhile, this is just one of those cases where the admin got it wrong.
Hey — sometimes following all the rules gets a bad result — it happens. 201.142.197.156 ( talk) 23:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
First off, thank you for the quick response at AIV! I just wanted to ask though, (not being familiar with range blocks), will the one year block you added for that range also include 92.40.191.69? Because it's still only showing the 1 week block by another admin. Thanks again - wolf 04:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I only added "suspended" to the Overland Airways as, in theory the airline hasn't operated the route in a long time
Tunisair had also suspended the Cotonou route and remains so.
I noticed that Camair-Co do not operate flights into Cotonou anymore. A quick check on Flightmapper, as well as FlightRadar24 confirms that the airlines operating the sector are Air Senegal & Rwandair.
I'm not sure why I was blocked for Vandalism? Maybe we just delete the Tunisair, Overland Airways and the Camair-Co entries then.
Thanks. 86.17.128.215 ( talk) 22:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I have a screenshot showing I was blocked by Ad Orientem. How can I show that to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.128.215 ( talk) 09:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Given your stated biases, something like this is not okay. Please do not do that again. jps ( talk) 03:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't know if you want to hear from me any longer or not, but there are two things that I think you misinterpreted here: 1) I think the problem with your close was that it argued that religious belief is not under the remit of WP:FTN. However, it is. It just is. The fact that this argument aligns with a theistic conceit is why it seemed to me that this was a biased move. Of course, I cannot know your intent, which is why I pointe out that it was the appearance of bias that I was concerned about. But... rather more concerning to me was 2) the later realization that you thought this was an admin action (it had not occurred to me that you had considered it such until you intimated it above). This is a fundamental misapprehension of what it means to be an admin on WP. It strikes me as being officious, to be honest. That actually concerns me somewhat more than (what I considered to be) a poorly considered close. Not sure if you care about this explanation, but there it is. jps ( talk) 03:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
BangJan1999 19:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks so much for helping me revert edits from that IP, it was a pretty big mess. So much so that my computer literally blue screened with a memory ran out error from the amount of articles I had opened that they fucked up which like never happens lmao. Thanks again! Zekerocks11 ( talk) 23:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Morning, I see you're currently active, could you please consider actioning this request ? Thanx, - FlightTime ( open channel) 18:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
Ad, I love you. I love looking at my Watchlist and seeing "Ad Orientem has blocked yadayada" every single time. You are the best. You constantly keep that page clear like its a baby or something I don't know anymore. P.S. I will continue to try and make my block requests funny but legit at the same time to try and get you guys to laugh or to get you to roll your eyes in annoyance, whichever comes first. You have earned this one. Keep up the good work and keep getting those bastards that aren't here to build this place. Best, Zeke ( talk) 03:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I was watching the discussion at ANI and wanted to ask for an advice related to your closure.
What's a correct course of action in a situation when:
Should this be interpreted as a lack of consensus for deletion or lack of consensus for inclusion? What's the best course of action for editor B if they still disagree with the deletion? PaulT2022 ( talk) 01:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Ad we could use your help with the backlog right now for AIV. Vandals are pretty busy tonight.
Best, Zeke ( talk) 02:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Lmao dude they're Sandbox edits, like noone cares! 175.156.197.65 ( talk) 10:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Hi Brian K. Tyler, what is going on at the bottom of your talk page? I am posting this query here so as not to draw any attention from a certain IP who is probably watching your page. I can't figure out what they are up to. But what I am seeing feels like you are being trolled. If I am misreading this please let me know. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)